Global warming and climate change has been a hot topic for quite a few years now and has gained a lot of attention on both sides of the fence. Some say it is a real threat humans are responsible for causing while others claim this is all a hoax made up by governments to impose new taxes and make more money. Let’s find out who’s on track with this one.

“It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed and appalled and highly and offended by it. Global Warming; it is a scam.” -Founder of The Weather Channel John Coleman.

As stated in a key document by the founder member of the Club of Rome which is a known key sector of Elite manipulation:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” -Aurelio Peccei, Founder of The Club of Rome

Another member of The Club of Rome is known as the face of global warming, Al Gore. Gore promotes the fact that global warming is in large part a problem caused by CO2 emissions by humans. Claims like this have triggered international law and taxation plans to begin to charge everyone for their part of CO2 emissions. The release of his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth has given him a Nobel Piece prize as well as an Oscar. We are about to find out why he received these awards.

The argument made by those who claim man is responsible for climate change is through the production of various materials as well as fossil fuel emissions we are creating a huge “carbon footprint” as they call it. Natural gas is said to be one of the highest producers of CO2 according to the EPA. The very act of breathing is also creating CO2 and thus overpopulation is said to be a cause of global warming because of our breathing. If we aren’t beginning to see how ridiculous this is yet, lets start to go to the facts.

Something that the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is in large part a big contributor in research to the side of man causing global warming.  One aspect of their research that is often not shared is exactly how little of an effect CO2 has in making up greenhouse gases and even further, of that tiny amount, how much of it is actually created by man. The graph below shows us what makes up the greenhouse gases said to be causing global warming. As you can see, CO2 is only a tiny sliver of that delicious looking pie.

This graph below shows how much of the CO2 in the graph above is actually made by humans. As you can plainly see, nature itself is a cause for the majority of CO2 emissions.

This is because temperature controls CO2, not the other way around, as climate gurus would have you believe. The fact is, humans only contribute 3% of all CO2 emissions, the rest is nature itself! So how can our measly 3% be the cause of all this warming? It isn’t the cause. In fact, CO2 isn’t the cause of global warming at all. Man is not responsible for global warming! Let me throw in a disclaimer here, I am not one for supporting pollution. I do not feel the burning of fossil fuels, dumping of toxic waste or littering of massive amounts of wasteful garbage is good for our planet. I would love to see it all change as much as the next person. In fact, I know we already have ALL the technology available to completely eliminate fossil fuels and toxic waste, but this is another topic.

Another key factor we must look at in the global warming debate is that Earth is not the only planet heating up. It has been recorded and noted that other planets in our solar system have also been warming up over the years. This suggests that there must be some other factor at play given that earth is not the only planet being affected. A more light hearted way of looking at it might be that either all of the beings on these other planets are still using fossil fuels and breathing out CO2 giving us an argument that CO2 emission’s may actually affect the global warming or it’s the sun. Since the sun is a source of heat to not only our planet but also the other planets in our solar system, it seems more likely that this be the cause.

“I don’t believe in man-made climate change because there is no evidence for it. In fact, carbon dioxide is controlled by world temperatures rather than the other way around,” he told RT. “Climate change is going on, and the key aspects of the big, very extreme events that happened in the last 18 months were predicted by us, the Weather Action, using solar activity.

“Carbon dioxide has zero effect, I repeat: zero effect, no effect whatsoever.” -Piers Corbyn, Founder of Weather Action Foundation

It seems that Mr. Corbyn is correct as shown above in the graph. To reiterate a few more stats to further show this, CO2 accounts for a tiny portion of actual gases that affect the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere.

There is another interesting fact we must look at when thinking about how man made global warming generated so much attention in the first place. The IPCC has been reporting the effects of C02 on the planet as the main cause for warming for years. They report that the C02 from humans is the biggest threat and therefore our actions are the main cause of the warming. While many had a lot of skepticism towards this group due to the financial and political interests they had towards the subject, the cat was completely let out of the bag when their systems were hacked and emails were found. The emails contained information that proved beyond a doubt that the IPCC was creating false data to prove that man was responsible for climate change and that climate change is much worse than we think.

Below is one of the emails found:
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@virginia.edu, mhughes@ltrr.arizona.edu
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@uea.ac.uk,t.osborn@uea.ac.uk

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.

Cheers
Phil

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone               +44 (0) 1603 592090         +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk

As we can see in this email, scientists have been purposely manipulating data to make it seem like climate change is a real threat. This news story which ended up making its way all the way to mainstream news unfortunately did nothing to squash the hoax of man made global warming. This also shows the greater power that the IPCC has in manipulating others to believe their data. Much of this manipulation comes through attacking the emotional side of people to get them to agree to ideas without even having any data to back anything up. This same technique is used when we look at other things like 9/11 or illness. Facts are brought that disprove official stories but are squashed with simple statements that play on the emotional responses of society. An example would be when 9/11 facts are brought forth and Ex-President Clinton responded. “How dare you insult families?” This classic approach is often used to dodge questions on global stages such as the one Clinton was on.

Not too long after the release of the emails it was revealed that a scientist from the IPCC had finally admitted outright that the data was false and purposely skewed to initiate legal action. Legal action we all know would make certain people a lot of money.

“The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.”

It’s funny, seems Nobel Peace Prizes seem to be going towards people and reports that are soon after revealed a fraud. I wonder why, could be because they are handed out by the same people pushing the agenda?

Dr. Lal states in an interview:

‘It related to several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action.

‘It had importance for the region, so we thought we should put it in.’

‘We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was “grey literature” [material not published in a peer-reviewed journal]. But it was never picked up by any of the authors in our working group, nor by any of the more than 500 external reviewers, by the governments to which it was sent, or by the final IPCC review editors.’

But even with that formal admission to the hoax we still see today a push from politicians and the IPCC to reduce carbon emissions and create global taxes. It seems that no matter what comes forward in the form of truth behind manmade global warming and even global warming itself, the IPCC and climate scientists seem to be able to continue getting money for what they do, which is essentially lie to the public about global warming and get paid doing it.

The simple truth about climate temperatures heating up relates to simple cycles the sun goes through. There is an 11 year cycle the sun goes through where its radiation becomes more extreme and then less extreme. This cycle directly relates to the slight changes in earth heating and cooling as well as the heating and cooling of other planets. The sun, which provides the life-giving energy needed for our planet is not a steady-state energy producer.  The current sunspot cycle is expected to peak in 2013 and, consequently, that is expected to be a turbulent year.

“More importantly, the Sun is now changing from its Solar Grand Maximum to its Solar Grand Minimum. The Earth heats up after a Solar Grand Maximum, lagging a bit after the peak. With a Solar Grand Minimum now on its way, a “global cooling” may be on the horizon–a natural oscillation occurring in much longer solar cycles.

Latest science reveals that sharp increases in global warming “precede” sharp increases in CO2–not the other way around. Global warming causes more CO2 to be released form the oceans. Current research also shows that Earth’s oceans are now beginning to cool. It is also now clear that temperatures over the last century correlate far better with cycles in oceans than they do with carbon dioxide; and, the temperature cycles in oceans are caused by cycles of the sun.”

Not only is man made global warming a hoax but global warming itself is not exactly what we think it is. It is simply a cycle the earth goes through, as well as the entire solar system, as it relates to the sun. It is always good to follow the money, the agenda and of course who is looking for the power when looking into these myths. Almost always it comes down to certain people wanting to have power over others, this is why things are manipulated so much.

Finally, below is some data that shows cooling is taking place on earth and that the ice caps are growing.

“We can clearly gather from this data that what we have been sold by mass media and fraud organizations like Al Gore and Greenpeace is not the truth.  To think we are about to be taxed on something that is a complete fraud.”

“According to NOAA GISS data winter temperatures in the Antarctic has actually fallen by 1°F since 1957, with the coldest year being 2004. All the while global CO2 levels have gone up..”

So the ice caps are diminishing to a degree in areas and water levels are rising. We now know this is not the cause of humans and we do know there is a direct link between the suns natural cycles and warming. However, we can take things even deeper when we look at the direct correlation between a rise in C02 levels after solar flares. This shows us that the increase in C02 and temperatures is again related to the suns natural workings and not what we are doing as humans.

For example earlier in 2012, the sunspot group causing the flares named AR1515 was quite active. This group stretches across 118,681 miles (191,000km) of the sun’s surface. It’s increased activity has dramatically increased the amount of energy being released by the sun. As that energy radiates away from the sun, some of it will impact the earth causing more energy to be deposited on our doorstep as heat.  This will increase our planet’s temperatures, and some areas may experience record-level temperatures. Once again we see that its not that humans start breathing more or that we were driving our cars more, it’s common sense natural cycles that are causing the warming.

 

Let’s be clear that the pollution we are causing to the planet is not a good thing. The burning of fossil fuels, the wasting of products in the ways that we do and the releasing of chemicals and toxins into our air that destroy our environment is not being helped by exposing manmade global warming as a hoax. This is a whole different issue on its own, the purpose of this article is simply to show that what we are told about global warming on a mass scale is incorrect and that not many efforts to fix the real problem are even being made. Mainly because reducing pollution would reduce profits.

Sources:

http://rt.com/news/carbon-canada-effect-kyoto-773/

http://www.livescience.com/1349-sun-blamed-warming-earth-worlds.html

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=10666569

http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/11/ipcc-scientists-hacked-emails-leaked-damning.html