Undeniable Evidence Proves Global Warming is Not Manmade

Global warming and climate change has been a hot topic for quite a few years now and has gained a lot of attention on both sides of the fence. Some say it is a real threat humans are responsible for causing while others claim this is all a hoax made up by governments to impose new taxes and make more money. Let’s find out who’s on track with this one.

“It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed and appalled and highly and offended by it. Global Warming; it is a scam.” -Founder of The Weather Channel John Coleman.

As stated in a key document by the founder member of the Club of Rome which is a known key sector of Elite manipulation:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” -Aurelio Peccei, Founder of The Club of Rome

Another member of The Club of Rome is known as the face of global warming, Al Gore. Gore promotes the fact that global warming is in large part a problem caused by CO2 emissions by humans. Claims like this have triggered international law and taxation plans to begin to charge everyone for their part of CO2 emissions. The release of his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth has given him a Nobel Piece prize as well as an Oscar. We are about to find out why he received these awards.

The argument made by those who claim man is responsible for climate change is through the production of various materials as well as fossil fuel emissions we are creating a huge “carbon footprint” as they call it. Natural gas is said to be one of the highest producers of CO2 according to the EPA. The very act of breathing is also creating CO2 and thus overpopulation is said to be a cause of global warming because of our breathing. If we aren’t beginning to see how ridiculous this is yet, lets start to go to the facts.

Something that the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is in large part a big contributor in research to the side of man causing global warming.  One aspect of their research that is often not shared is exactly how little of an effect CO2 has in making up greenhouse gases and even further, of that tiny amount, how much of it is actually created by man. The graph below shows us what makes up the greenhouse gases said to be causing global warming. As you can see, CO2 is only a tiny sliver of that delicious looking pie.

This graph below shows how much of the CO2 in the graph above is actually made by humans. As you can plainly see, nature itself is a cause for the majority of CO2 emissions.

This is because temperature controls CO2, not the other way around, as climate gurus would have you believe. The fact is, humans only contribute 3% of all CO2 emissions, the rest is nature itself! So how can our measly 3% be the cause of all this warming? It isn’t the cause. In fact, CO2 isn’t the cause of global warming at all. Man is not responsible for global warming! Let me throw in a disclaimer here, I am not one for supporting pollution. I do not feel the burning of fossil fuels, dumping of toxic waste or littering of massive amounts of wasteful garbage is good for our planet. I would love to see it all change as much as the next person. In fact, I know we already have ALL the technology available to completely eliminate fossil fuels and toxic waste, but this is another topic.

Another key factor we must look at in the global warming debate is that Earth is not the only planet heating up. It has been recorded and noted that other planets in our solar system have also been warming up over the years. This suggests that there must be some other factor at play given that earth is not the only planet being affected. A more light hearted way of looking at it might be that either all of the beings on these other planets are still using fossil fuels and breathing out CO2 giving us an argument that CO2 emission’s may actually affect the global warming or it’s the sun. Since the sun is a source of heat to not only our planet but also the other planets in our solar system, it seems more likely that this be the cause.

“I don’t believe in man-made climate change because there is no evidence for it. In fact, carbon dioxide is controlled by world temperatures rather than the other way around,” he told RT. “Climate change is going on, and the key aspects of the big, very extreme events that happened in the last 18 months were predicted by us, the Weather Action, using solar activity.

“Carbon dioxide has zero effect, I repeat: zero effect, no effect whatsoever.” -Piers Corbyn, Founder of Weather Action Foundation

It seems that Mr. Corbyn is correct as shown above in the graph. To reiterate a few more stats to further show this, CO2 accounts for a tiny portion of actual gases that affect the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases form about 3 % of the atmosphere by volume. They consist of varying amounts, (about 97%) of water vapour and clouds, with the remainder being gases like CO2, CH4, Ozone and N2O, of which carbon dioxide is the largest amount. Hence, CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere.

There is another interesting fact we must look at when thinking about how man made global warming generated so much attention in the first place. The IPCC has been reporting the effects of C02 on the planet as the main cause for warming for years. They report that the C02 from humans is the biggest threat and therefore our actions are the main cause of the warming. While many had a lot of skepticism towards this group due to the financial and political interests they had towards the subject, the cat was completely let out of the bag when their systems were hacked and emails were found. The emails contained information that proved beyond a doubt that the IPCC was creating false data to prove that man was responsible for climate change and that climate change is much worse than we think.

Below is one of the emails found:
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@virginia.edu, mhughes@ltrr.arizona.edu
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@uea.ac.uk,t.osborn@uea.ac.uk

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.

Cheers
Phil

Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone               +44 (0) 1603 592090         +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk

As we can see in this email, scientists have been purposely manipulating data to make it seem like climate change is a real threat. This news story which ended up making its way all the way to mainstream news unfortunately did nothing to squash the hoax of man made global warming. This also shows the greater power that the IPCC has in manipulating others to believe their data. Much of this manipulation comes through attacking the emotional side of people to get them to agree to ideas without even having any data to back anything up. This same technique is used when we look at other things like 9/11 or illness. Facts are brought that disprove official stories but are squashed with simple statements that play on the emotional responses of society. An example would be when 9/11 facts are brought forth and Ex-President Clinton responded. “How dare you insult families?” This classic approach is often used to dodge questions on global stages such as the one Clinton was on.

Not too long after the release of the emails it was revealed that a scientist from the IPCC had finally admitted outright that the data was false and purposely skewed to initiate legal action. Legal action we all know would make certain people a lot of money.

“The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders.”

It’s funny, seems Nobel Peace Prizes seem to be going towards people and reports that are soon after revealed a fraud. I wonder why, could be because they are handed out by the same people pushing the agenda?

Dr. Lal states in an interview:

‘It related to several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action.

‘It had importance for the region, so we thought we should put it in.’

‘We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was “grey literature” [material not published in a peer-reviewed journal]. But it was never picked up by any of the authors in our working group, nor by any of the more than 500 external reviewers, by the governments to which it was sent, or by the final IPCC review editors.’

But even with that formal admission to the hoax we still see today a push from politicians and the IPCC to reduce carbon emissions and create global taxes. It seems that no matter what comes forward in the form of truth behind manmade global warming and even global warming itself, the IPCC and climate scientists seem to be able to continue getting money for what they do, which is essentially lie to the public about global warming and get paid doing it.

The simple truth about climate temperatures heating up relates to simple cycles the sun goes through. There is an 11 year cycle the sun goes through where its radiation becomes more extreme and then less extreme. This cycle directly relates to the slight changes in earth heating and cooling as well as the heating and cooling of other planets. The sun, which provides the life-giving energy needed for our planet is not a steady-state energy producer.  The current sunspot cycle is expected to peak in 2013 and, consequently, that is expected to be a turbulent year.

“More importantly, the Sun is now changing from its Solar Grand Maximum to its Solar Grand Minimum. The Earth heats up after a Solar Grand Maximum, lagging a bit after the peak. With a Solar Grand Minimum now on its way, a “global cooling” may be on the horizon–a natural oscillation occurring in much longer solar cycles.

Latest science reveals that sharp increases in global warming “precede” sharp increases in CO2–not the other way around. Global warming causes more CO2 to be released form the oceans. Current research also shows that Earth’s oceans are now beginning to cool. It is also now clear that temperatures over the last century correlate far better with cycles in oceans than they do with carbon dioxide; and, the temperature cycles in oceans are caused by cycles of the sun.”

Not only is man made global warming a hoax but global warming itself is not exactly what we think it is. It is simply a cycle the earth goes through, as well as the entire solar system, as it relates to the sun. It is always good to follow the money, the agenda and of course who is looking for the power when looking into these myths. Almost always it comes down to certain people wanting to have power over others, this is why things are manipulated so much.

Finally, below is some data that shows cooling is taking place on earth and that the ice caps are growing.

“We can clearly gather from this data that what we have been sold by mass media and fraud organizations like Al Gore and Greenpeace is not the truth.  To think we are about to be taxed on something that is a complete fraud.”

“According to NOAA GISS data winter temperatures in the Antarctic has actually fallen by 1°F since 1957, with the coldest year being 2004. All the while global CO2 levels have gone up..”

So the ice caps are diminishing to a degree in areas and water levels are rising. We now know this is not the cause of humans and we do know there is a direct link between the suns natural cycles and warming. However, we can take things even deeper when we look at the direct correlation between a rise in C02 levels after solar flares. This shows us that the increase in C02 and temperatures is again related to the suns natural workings and not what we are doing as humans.

For example earlier in 2012, the sunspot group causing the flares named AR1515 was quite active. This group stretches across 118,681 miles (191,000km) of the sun’s surface. It’s increased activity has dramatically increased the amount of energy being released by the sun. As that energy radiates away from the sun, some of it will impact the earth causing more energy to be deposited on our doorstep as heat.  This will increase our planet’s temperatures, and some areas may experience record-level temperatures. Once again we see that its not that humans start breathing more or that we were driving our cars more, it’s common sense natural cycles that are causing the warming.

 

Let’s be clear that the pollution we are causing to the planet is not a good thing. The burning of fossil fuels, the wasting of products in the ways that we do and the releasing of chemicals and toxins into our air that destroy our environment is not being helped by exposing manmade global warming as a hoax. This is a whole different issue on its own, the purpose of this article is simply to show that what we are told about global warming on a mass scale is incorrect and that not many efforts to fix the real problem are even being made. Mainly because reducing pollution would reduce profits.

Sources:

http://rt.com/news/carbon-canada-effect-kyoto-773/

http://www.livescience.com/1349-sun-blamed-warming-earth-worlds.html

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=10666569

http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_briefing_room/2009/11/ipcc-scientists-hacked-emails-leaked-damning.html

More From 'Alternative News'

CE provides a space for free thinkers to explore and discuss new, alternative information and ideas. The goal? Question everything, think differently, spread love and live a joy filled life.

79 comments on “Undeniable Evidence Proves Global Warming is Not Manmade

  1. Pingback: Only 36% of geoscientists and engineers believe in AGW - Page 3 (politics)

  2. Your research seems…flawed…If one truly understands the volatility of our planet’s eco system, it really should be no surprise that even the tiniest changes made by man have devastating effects. Just look at our track record for destroying animal populations and trying to fix them on our own. 3% us small to the layman but to the scientist, every number is important.

    I wonder, did you research those ” hoax” emails at all when you wrote this article? If you had you might have been informed that 3 intergovernmental panels went over all of those emails and found no evidence of fraud. The ‘ hoax’ idea was just a lie perpetuated by the people trying to trick the world into thinking that man has no large effect on the earth’s systems.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/14/AR2010041404001.html?wprss=rss_nation

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/07/third-enquiry-clears-climategate-scientists-of-serious-wrongdoing.html

    • I have heard of those claims as well and understand that they were cleared however I don’t completely buy the story only because there is a lot at stake here and it’s easy to see how things could have been tweaked either way to clear people involved. Some of that info is from 2010 as well, at the time they will still pushing quite hard at the man-made global warming agenda. While I think we have climate changes happening, I don’t think we fully understand them nor man’s impact. In fact I think it has become evidently clear in the past couple of years that we are more so polluting and destroying our ecosystem. the man made warming seems not existent as temperatures are cyclical in nature and regardless of our actions are actually dropping right now. Projections set out by these institutions have been proven massively incorrect and it has sent the climate science world into a bit of confusion.

  3. Man needs religon, but men are too arrogant, and ignorant to believe in an unproveable God, so they invented after many false starts , the unproveable globbal warming god, who got eaten by the Climate change God, father of the great moving goal post diety.

    Humans offer sacrifices to these gods in petrol stations all over the Uk, where much of the sacrifice, is nicked spent on duck houses and bombing muslims, who dont worship the climate change god.

    Also big shrines are built to the climate change god, called turbines, to save theclimate the high priests of the moving goal post sect, fly all round the world in jets having conferences or worship events in the caribean, with wives all blowing more hot air and collecting air miles, which replaced bread in mass , air miles are the body of christ. The position of Turbines in berkshire need to be decided in conferences in the caribean, by scientist high priests, god knows why

  4. Brendan

    Climate change is a very complex issue relating to natural warming/cooling cycles, sun-spot activity, extrasolar radiation and (yes, I blaspheme here) HUMAN EMISSIONS.

    Has anybody heard of the carbon isotope ratio? If any of you know about carbon dating, then you should know that fossil fuels stored underground for millions of years will have much lower C13/C12 ratios than the systems which are in flux with the atmosphere.

    If human emissions are altering the composition of the atmosphere, it should be detectable in the C13/C12 ratio of CO2 in the atmosphere. This is the case:

    http://www.bgc.mpg.de/service/iso_gas_lab/publications/PG_WB_IJMS.pdf

    Claiming that “only 3%” isn’t enough to make a difference is just that; a claim. A baseless claim. Not to mention and inaccurate claim when you look at CO2 levels in the atmosphere; the part which actually counts:

    http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/last_400k_yrs.html

    Now, I understand that CO2 levels will vary over time, and they have been higher in the past. But use your brain for a moment; atmospheric CO2 levels start rising at the beginning of the industrial revolution and are now higher than they have been in hundreds of thousands of years (approaching double the average); since before we were even human! If you’re going to say natural processes are doing this, well, that’s one hell of a coincidence…

    But hey; don’t take my word for it. I bet everybody here wants a cleaner atmosphere, and that’s what it’s really all about. I’m a results man; as long as we stop polluting people can believe whatever they want about the cause. If we’re doing it, it will stop. If we’re not, then it’s controlled my forces larger than we can deal with.

  5. Tom

    Where did all the WATER go? Conversion of mass & energy balanced chemical equations should at a minimum show twice the tonnage of water to CO2. The last time there was that much water; Noah built an arc.

  6. Pingback: Scientists Baffled as Report Proves Global Warming Has Stopped | Stuff Ain't Right

  7. Pingback: Scientists May Have To Recalculate Global Warming | RUM ONLINE

  8. Pingback: Scientists Baffled as Report Proves Global Warming Has Stopped | Collective-Evolution

  9. Fredrik

    “We have all decided Global Warming is a scientific fact, don’t you come and question it!”

    Please, any real science must accept people throwing ideas or alternative hypotheses up in the air. If it’s untrue shoot it down with proof. The fact of the matter is that most of these so called sciences are riddled with methodology errors that makes it next to impossible to say what is true and more importantly what’s causing it. Add to that economical interests and other agendas and you have a less than optimal environment for finding the truth (if someone was even interested in that in the first place).

  10. Just like to Add , We have not really been observing the oceans long enough to know what changes it goes through. its not been that long from when we fist jumped into the sea with breathing apparatus. May be 50-60 yeas has man really taken note of what lies in the reefs and the abyss.

  11. What happens now, and in the next 10 years, is going to shock us all. As we are the biggest cancer of the earth, Global warming is just a part of the earths scheduled cycle. As to is the earth magnetic change, And effects from all the universe, However , This has been disrupted from man messing with nature, un balancing what nature goes through for a reason. like a forrest can have a fire to make new growth. Sadly we cut and kill everything. no growth, Be choke the lungs of the soil, we used to love. we choke it all, with roads and city blocks. me explode nukes and put aviation fumes into the clouds. polluting everything from car fumes car tires. trash from homes, Just look at my FB with the http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.138142296882.119812.639661882&type=3 Yep! its bad. Read the fact ,see the facts. whiteness it for your self. Step away from the commercial resorts. See what lay behind the scenes, What humans are doing to the planet. We are just making the change a hard one for the planet to recover. But we have nothing to do with earth quakes and volcanoes. Or do we? by keep sucking the life out of the planet for oil and gas. What we take out, Something has to re fill the hole. Right? Something has to give!
    Coral bleaching , is it due to global warming? i think not, As i have seen this change came and go. its more likely to be like the change in the planet its self. A re vitalisation or resting period. What Do we all have to take things for granted, Why do we all have to think life and creation works like we think it should? We are not god! All living things go through a rest or need one.

  12. JPH

    It is the terminology that is incorrect, we wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for climate change.

  13. mrk

    Joe Martino, thank you for taking the time to write this article and especially and for answering most of the comments. you definitely have more patients than me and i respect you for trying to present information so people can make an informed decision. unfortunately some people did not read the article as i did and persist in arguing about things that you have been clearly stated in your article ie. we have the technology to change our dependents on dirty energy but these have been suppressed by the people that stand to lose money and power.

    Im not a scientist and i don’t pretend to be so i have a question for these experts on here. If we are the cause of global warming, were we the cause of the end of the ice age??? caus i must of had a bad history teacher!

    Like you said SEVERAL times in your article, im all for cutting pollution and our dependence on fossil fuels but taxing carbon will do very little to produce clean energy and save the planet. it will make the rich richer and the poor poorer, meanwhile taking valuable resources away from renewable energy and cutting pollution. Thanks again for your efforts and would love to read your next article if u could post a link.

    • Collective Evolution

      Thanks for the support and kind words. One must really have control over the ego in this public arena or else things can get ugly quickly lol

      That is how my journey started as well, questioning things that didn’t seem to make sense to me and gave me a weird feeling. It really wasn’t long before you see the big inconsistencies and when the debunking material comes out, it is always unbelievably flawed. I am working on an article right now that will put this entire debate to rest completely. The fact is, it is a 100% fact, no room for debate, that global warming is not man-made and not caused by CO2. There is only a few reasons why the debate continues, money, ignorance and politics. The science is all there, it proves everything. Certain scientists who are still behind in thinking that it is man-made simply have not exposed themselves to the data that throws their beliefs and accomplishments out the window. This is the true challenge to this debate, science has become a belief system. We have trouble moving aside things we have identified with even when they are proven wrong.

      New articles should be up shortly.

      • Collective Evolution, you failed repeatedly to answer my questions:

        1) If we are not taxed by measurement of CO2, we should be taxed and put price tags on the lost balance of our eco diversity that is vital to all circle of lives.

        2) Are you going to deny dust bowls, the history of man made natural disaster?

        3) What difference does it make if our climate change is not caused by human, so that we could keep on doing business as usual?

        You are obviously dodging crucial challenges to your articles. I’m presenting my point of debates in a raw fashion, not for the interest of any personal gains or victory, but for the greater cause and survival of all life on earth. Just to make it clear I don’t get personal here, I have no interest of attacking anyone to make myself to appear to be a better being. Peace! :)

  14. Documentary by PBS/Frontline:
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/climate-of-doubt/
    Documentary by PBS/Independent Lens:
    http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/park-avenue/

  15. 1) I wonder what would have happened if Dust Bowl was won over by the deniers?

    2) To me, pollution or man-made global warming, the debate between the two are almost futile and irrelevant, either way we ALL have to pay, either with money or our health and lives. You get to pick and choose.

    3) The GOP and other special interest groups including oil companies, over the years have tried hard and successfully convinced public opinions that human activities have not contributed to our climate change. The saddest thing about this polarized opinions and fights is who’s right who’s wrong, so on one wants to pay any price on this issue. Fix the god damn environmental problems first instead of arguing if it’s manmade or not.
    Sometimes it is good to have ‘different and provocative opinions’, but this issue is not about ‘opinions’, it is about ‘the overwhelming facts’ that’s been again and again presented and exhausted to be proved logically and scientifically. I for one, started out as a doubter, I have also swayed back and forth and constantly keeping up with this issue, I’m determined to make conscious and reasonable choices to eliminate pollutions and ready to pay for the cause. There are so many creative ways to do about tax distributions, and I’m sure we are paying some stupid taxes right now that we don’t even agree with when they were first implemented.

    4) The title of your article is simply irresponsible and arrogant.

    5) Sources in questioning your conclusions in your article:
    From Wikipedia –
    *** Solar activity –
    Solar variations causing changes in solar radiation energy reaching the Earth have been the cause of past climate changes.[88][89] The effect of changes in solar forcing in recent decades is uncertain, but small, with some studies showing a slight cooling effect,[90][91] while others studies suggest a slight warming effect.[50][92][93][94]
    Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere.[50] Radiosonde (weather balloon) data show the stratosphere has cooled over the period since observations began (1958), though there is greater uncertainty in the early radiosonde record. Satellite observations, which have been available since 1979, also show cooling.[95]
    A related hypothesis, proposed by Henrik Svensmark, is that magnetic activity of the sun deflects cosmic rays that may influence the generation of cloud condensation nuclei and thereby affect the climate.[96] Other research has found no relation between warming in recent decades and cosmic rays.[97][98] The influence of cosmic rays on cloud cover is about a factor of 100 lower than needed to explain the observed changes in clouds or to be a significant contributor to present-day climate change.[99]
    The fact we still see a positive imbalance despite the prolonged solar minimum isn’t a surprise given what we’ve learned about the climate system…But it’s worth noting, because this provides unequivocal evidence that the sun is not the dominant driver of global warming.[100]
    “”
    In line with other details mentioned above, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies James Hansen says that the sun is not nearly the biggest factor in global warming. Discussing the fact that low amounts of solar activity between 2005 and 2010 had hardly any effect on global warming,[101] Hansen says it is more evidence that greenhouse gases are the largest culprit; that is, he supports the theory advanced by “nearly all climate scientists” including the IPCC.[100] ***

  16. 1) I wonder what would have happened if Dust Bowl was won over by the deniers?

    2) To me, pollution or man-made global warming, the debate between the two are almost futile and irrelevant, either way we ALL have to pay, either with money or our health and lives. You get to pick and choose.

    3) The GOP and other special interest groups including oil companies, over the years have tried hard and successfully convinced public opinions that human activities have not contributed to our climate change. The saddest thing about this polarized opinions and fights is who’s right who’s wrong, so on one wants to pay any price on this issue. Fix the god damn environmental problems first instead of arguing if it’s manmade or not.

    Sometimes it is good to have ‘different and provocative opinions’, but this issue is not about ‘opinions’, it is about ‘the overwhelming facts’ that’s been again and again presented and exhausted to be proved logically and scientifically. I for one, started out as a doubter, I have also swayed back and forth and constantly keeping up with this issue, I’m determined to make conscious and reasonable choices to eliminate pollutions and ready to pay for the cause. There are so many creative ways to do about tax distributions, and I’m sure we are paying some stupid taxes right now that we don’t even agree with when they were first implemented.

    4) The title of your article is simply irresponsible and arrogant.

    5) Sources in questioning your conclusions in your article:

    From Wikipedia –
    *** Solar activity –
    Solar variations causing changes in solar radiation energy reaching the Earth have been the cause of past climate changes.[88][89] The effect of changes in solar forcing in recent decades is uncertain, but small, with some studies showing a slight cooling effect,[90][91] while others studies suggest a slight warming effect.[50][92][93][94]
    Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere.[50] Radiosonde (weather balloon) data show the stratosphere has cooled over the period since observations began (1958), though there is greater uncertainty in the early radiosonde record. Satellite observations, which have been available since 1979, also show cooling.[95]
    A related hypothesis, proposed by Henrik Svensmark, is that magnetic activity of the sun deflects cosmic rays that may influence the generation of cloud condensation nuclei and thereby affect the climate.[96] Other research has found no relation between warming in recent decades and cosmic rays.[97][98] The influence of cosmic rays on cloud cover is about a factor of 100 lower than needed to explain the observed changes in clouds or to be a significant contributor to present-day climate change.[99]
    The fact we still see a positive imbalance despite the prolonged solar minimum isn’t a surprise given what we’ve learned about the climate system…But it’s worth noting, because this provides unequivocal evidence that the sun is not the dominant driver of global warming.[100]
    “”
    In line with other details mentioned above, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies James Hansen says that the sun is not nearly the biggest factor in global warming. Discussing the fact that low amounts of solar activity between 2005 and 2010 had hardly any effect on global warming,[101] Hansen says it is more evidence that greenhouse gases are the largest culprit; that is, he supports the theory advanced by “nearly all climate scientists” including the IPCC.[100] ***

    Documentary by PBS/Frontline:
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/climate-of-doubt/

    Documentary by PBS/Independent Lens:
    http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/park-avenue/

  17. Juergen

    Brother Joe, glad we agree on the key importance of awareness, consciousness and self-responsibility.
    Quite interesting, you are pointing to their insane focus, I am pointing to your focus ;)
    I believe the power lies within US, i.e. you, me, we… not them. Not the governments, the corporates, the conspirators, the Jews, the Rothshilds, the reptilians, the aliens, the chemtrails etc. All these might be parts of the problem and it’s correct to call them out but they are not the core of problem nor solution. They are more symptoms rather the root cause.
    I have worked for corporations and with governments, they are full of people like you and me. These people have certain desires, fears etc. but are striving in the same direction as us (i.e. the soul making experiences, hence learning and expanding consciousness).
    The “us vs. them” attitude does not make sense if we want to overcome separateness towards the realization of oneness. There are no great conspiracies nor hoaxes we can externalize our own issues onto for long.
    All these externals are mirrors of our internals.The solution is our inner work which manifests in our outer work and environment. As long as we project and externalize issues, we are missing the focus on our own power and response-ability.
    All the best, Juergen

  18. Juergen

    Joe Martino, your argument is grossly diverting from the real issue. To downplay human triggered climate change does not help the cause to fight pollution.

    Isnt’t CE about raising awareness and expanding consciousness? If so, what about spiritual wisdom and the universal law that “as is inside so is outside”? This means that our inner side (soul, consciousness whatever called) is creating/attracting/manifesting the outside, material world.

    From this holistic perspective, externalizing challenges and claiming hoaxes etc. is really putting the attention onto symptoms, not the root cause. Imagine if we clean and heal our inner issues, then we will create the cleaner world we all are wishing for.

    • Brother im truly not here to argue and I do agree very much with what you shared in your second paragraph. The key focus of the article to to pull attention off of what the problem is not and more so focus it to what the problem is which is the pollution and degradation of our environment, air quality all by means of fossil fuels.

      I do think it is 100% more important that we clean up ourselves before we go out and try to do the external without fully knowing what we are creating. At the end of the day, there is a TON of government focus and corporation focus put on man made climate change and very very small amounts put on the pollution and fossil fuel front. The reason is because they are diverting us with a less serious issue and trying to profit off of it vs pointing out the true issue which is the pollution that our system and means of doing things is most responsible for. To me their insane focus on it raises a huge red flag.

  19. Madrid

    Joe Martino, there is no way you would actually believe what you wrote in this article had you done ANY basic research on the atmosphere, the greenhouse effect and the natural carbon cycle. This is elementary science. Your article is an epic fail!

    • This stuff is very well researched. Beyond the often believed to be true yet incorrect belief that humanity is creating the excess c02. In fact, the science is quite elementary in the basic cycles of c02 inflation. I feel we all need to be much more open to new findings vs ones we thought we once understood.

      • Madrid

        New findings? Don’t make me laugh!

        The CO2 we exhale is part of the natural carbon cycle and is taken into account when measuring the rising PPM of CO2. However tiny the amount we have released might seem to people like you, the additional concentration resulting from the burning of fossil fuels disrupts the natural carbon cycle, causing more molecules to be trapped in the atmosphere and holding in more heat as a result —- see the greenhouse effect. That CO2 causes warming is well established by physics theory. It’s not rocket science and it’s not some hidden scientific finding. It is easy-to-obtain common knowledge… something those paying attention in science class should know and, at your age, should understand. Are you going to change the entire body of knowledge and scientific understanding to prove the false claims by those denying the correlation between CO2 and warming you are happily regurgitating? Because that’s what it will take.

        However small your influence, there are people relying on you for factual information…. and you have sadly failed them. You should be ashamed of yourself, really.

        PS
        The only thing proven by the email you used as further evidence of “the hoax” is that it is very easy to present things out of context and have total fools believe without questioning what is being presented.

        • We appreciate the sharing of this info for others to have something to look at, but at the end of the day its whether one chooses to believe the info you mentioned above as based on my research it has long been proven to be a very small and minuscule cause in the atmosphere. It is another scheme by Gore and his elite buddies to trick people into thinking it is a good idea to begin taxing and blaming humanity for the c02 issues which diverts anyone from the REAL issue. POLLUTION. When people of power spend a great deal of time really pointing out something in particular, like they have with man made global warming, there is something they are diverting you from. I think it is important we remember to think of it this way when look at the “science.”

          • Madrid

            The sources you used to do your research are erroneous and were put out there to serve one purpose: to distract from truth.

            —–
            Global warming and climate change are more popular subjects –in relation to other pollution subjects– because it is the greatest existential threat humankind has ever faced… there is no known way to remove the excess CO2 type that comes from the burning of fossil fuels from the atmosphere and stop the constantly increasing warming effect. The only way is to ride it out…. but the more of this CO2 we add, the worse the ride becomes and could cause the extinction of a very significant number of life forms, including humans, in just about 200-400 years. We are already experiencing the effects and are beyond the point of no return with relation to how the warming will affect our climate and the biosphere, but the constant attacks from people denying this very real threat are causing a delay in the direct action required to peak and rapidly decrease the use of fossil fuels on a global scale, while seeking and developing alternative technologies. It is not about those of us who are alive today, as we will be affected very little by climate change in contrast with what’s to come. It is about being the generation who have the technology and knowledge at hand to STOP adding to the problem, yet we are not doing enough due to distractions, confusion, deceit, self-interest, ignorance, and pure irresponsibility.

            —-

            Going back to your article… The points you raised can be refuted using easy-to-find, common scientific knowledge and logic. The Climategate part is also an invalid point, as it was shown that the emails had been taken out of context to cause further delay and confusion. In other words, your points are not valid to support the title of your article: “Undeniable Evidence Proves Global Warming is Not Manmade”. When analyzing the CO2 in the atmosphere, you find that the excess CO2 has more mass. This means that it can only be coming from one source/carbon reservoir, and that type of CO2 can only be released in such quantities by us.

            —-
            How some people can take this very real threat to gain financially from it could be a better topic of discussion, if you are tired of the same old global warming/climate change talk and are more into conspiracies. Or how about talking about the $20+ trillion dollars the petroleum companies stand to lose as a result of the collective effort to develop alternatives to their products? Wouldn’t they make up all kinds of lies and pay off all kinds of people to spread those lies just take protect their financial interests? Or how about writing about the other sources of pollution you say we are being distracted from and offer possible solutions….?

  20. The level of intelligence on display from the advocates of the Anthropromorphic Global Warming theory is shockingly low. I feel like I’m reading a Fox News or Yahoo News comments board. I feel like most of them have copied and pasted a canned response, without even having read the article.

  21. Juergen

    Hallo CE, do you have any quality control for your articles? Falling into the conspiracy trap and externalizing our own responsibility? I am leaving CE, sorry cant spend my time with bad, flawed articles. The sources in this article are incredible weak, there are thousand of independent and credible research papers but you are showing an 12 year old email and dodgy graphs without reliable source? CE you better stick to what you are good at. Byebye.

  22. Pingback: The Global Warming Myth: Humanity causes global warming « Amsterdam Prepper

  23. Jackie

    I believe that there is a natural “climate change” taking place…however we’d be a little silly to think we can go about carelessly destryoing our planet and NOT have any reprocussions. Gas and oil alone….we’re sucking the blood out of the Earth.

  24. Jane

    The two graphs, Greenhouse Gases in the Atmosphere and Atmospheric CO2 Sources both come from a website with a right-wing agenda. The website cites itself as the source of the graphs. Where’s the science to back them up?

Leave a Reply

Nikola Tesla Secret
https://www.facebook.com/HTCTW.book
Subscribe to CE Magazine Monthly For Exclusive Content!

We Recommend

www.truththeory.com