Scientists Identify 27 Genes Associated With Asperger’s Syndrome: What Does This Mean?

asbergerAsperger’s syndrome is an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and is part of a distinct group of neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by communication difficulties, social impairment, restrictive, sterotypical and repetitive patterns of behavior. Abnormalities in social interaction may include isolation, and a lack of ability to pick up on non-verbal forms of communication. It’s also characterized by clumsiness and poor communication skills.

It is labelled as a disorder simply because there are observable differences with social interaction and behavior in social settings. Does that not seem highly questionable to you? So what if there are observable differences in behavior? Differences does not equal disorder, they are simply differences that are unique to the individual and require no cure.  When it comes to differences in brain functioning, the American Medical Association has a tendency to label them as disorders without sufficient evidence. When one reads a description of the ‘disorder’ the readers usually believe it without asking critical questions and making critical connections. If we are going to label something as a disorder without evidence, it is equally plausible to label them as an advantage. Truth is, we are made up of the same thing, we all bring our unique individuality to the whole.

Scientists have long suspected that there are genetic components to Asperger’s syndrome and other Autism Spectrum Disorders, but no specific gene has ever been identified. Instead, the most recent evidence indicates  a common group of genes whose variations make an individual more vulnerable to developing ASD. Scientists from the University of Cambridge have identified 27 genes that are associated with autistic traits and/or Asperger Syndrome. They looked at genes that are linked to the observable characteristics and qualities within a human being that are different than the “norm.” Genes identified were associated with empathy, judgement, decision making, social/emotional sensitivity and more. They chose these genes because these children show observable differences from the norm in these areas. For example, a child diagnosed with ASD or Asperger syndrome might look like they lack empathy or social and emotional sensitivity. I do not think we should judge a book by it’s cover, and I do not think differences in the genetic makeup responsible for empathy and emotional sensitivity should be labelled as a disorder. The research is published in the journal ‘Autism Research’ and this is the first candidate gene study of its kind.

The research found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 27 out of the 68 genes studied were nominally associated with either AS and/or with autistic traits/empathy. A single nucleotide polymorphism is a DNA sequence variation occurring when a single nucleotide in the genome differs between members of a biological species or paired chromosomes in a human. Nucleotides are molecules that form the building blocks of DNA. Therefore, the genetic structure of a child or adult with Asperger’s syndrome differs from the genetic structure of the mass population, different DNA. The cause of this is still unknown.

Observable differences here do not suggest a disorder, they simply mean exactly what the study finds, differences in DNA sequencing, that’s all. How do we know that evolution isn’t taking place? After all, single nucleotide polymorphisms are the most common type of genetic variation among people. Just because there are observable social and behavioral differences, coupled with observable differences in DNA/genetics does not give us the right to label, define and categorize children into a category of disorder. This can prevent them from achieving their full potential. Children often diagnosed with these labels usually show a number of remarkable qualities and characteristics. Medical associations and big pharmaceutical companies like to persuade professional opinion through academic literature, and they do it in a very clever way.

Sources:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089662730000115X

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/157802.php

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/genomicresearch/snp

Related Posts

36 comments on “Scientists Identify 27 Genes Associated With Asperger’s Syndrome: What Does This Mean?

  1. I have one kind of these so called “disorders”, not Aspergers, but Squizoid. As Autistic Spectrum “disorders” imply that they require a treatment, this designation IMHO allows for institutionalized health to take control over the life of “sufferers”. I happen to know that most people with this gift (I call it gift because its how I understand it is) are prone to see right through the lies of society and the mind controlling mass manipulation, so, we are a threat to the stablished powers. Hence, the need to label us, and make us seem a threat to “normal” people. The Sandy Hook shooter (alleged) had to be Aspergers, ain’t it?

  2. I do agree with the previous commentor, that people with those disorders really do see through what the surface of our society is. But when a child is totally unhappy and you would know this because the child would tell you, when they want to make friends but cant be cause theyre social skills are very for lack of a better word bad, when they try really hard to fit in when in truth they cant fit in, you want to help that child develop his unique abilities and you want them to make the friends they want so bad. Well labeling as you call it would be saying this one child is clumsy and this other child is stupid. Or using they’re uniqueness as a way to define who they are. But identifying where their problems start and where they come from you are able to find the individual intervention to bring to this child and help them be who they want to be. Disorders do exist but they are not labels. If you use them as a label you are not doing your job. Now I am not saying that every child diagnosed is actualy taken care of in the proper way because in every area of expertise they are idiots and good ones. Some just label and medicate. Others observe, talk to, listen to, learn from, gets to know the child and identifies as corectly as possible then tripple quadruple checks his findings then trys a bunch of methods before even considering medication. But to say these arent real and are just excuses to toss the different aside is wrong. The commentor before probably delt with people who did not have his best interest at heart, but theres people like me who work with kids and want to specialise in the ones with disorders because I know their true uniqueness and talents. I want them to bloom and be the best versions of themselves as they possibly can be just like the “normal” kids get to do. Some of us dont want to toss them aside, some of us want to learn from them and help the ones that need and want help. Not everything is as negetive as you made it out to be.
    Please excuse my horrible spelling, I am french and have bad english grammar. :)

    • Max Born

      A great letter Louise, and I agree with everything you say. But my main point is to congratulate you on your wonderful English, spelling, grammar and expression, all outstanding and better than 90% of my fellow English speakers. I couldn´t find a single mistake, or anything to criticize, and I also dig your modesty. Well done you!

  3. Oh and one last thing : by doing what I am doing I am letting these people become the world changers they could be. Be cause believe me, they will change the world.

  4. Well Louise, thanks for your input. Perhaps the main difference between my “disorder” and Aspergers is that I don’t ever feel the need to fit into society, and perhaps that saved me of ever suffering any discrimination or labelling as a child. I discovered this as an adult, and it only helped me to finally understand why I was so different and uninterested in what others called “normal”. As I said, for me is a gift, But I do see childs of friends with the Asperger being labelled and treated with medication, and that’s what I dread, the need to treat something perfectly natural as a disease. I commend you for your efforts of helping these childs to be happy and grow to their full potential without the intervention of the society that wants them “normal”. And I really hope this knowledge become widespread instead of trying to medicate the “normalcy” into these blessed kids.

  5. Chanda

    I always thought that I was a curse and I was recommended to be admitted in an asylum on 7 different occasions by 5 counselors and 2 psychiatrists. I hid myself for 15+ years. Just now I’m starting to come out and the right type of people are finding me very fascinating and they love me and my gift. They tell me to embrace myself and they acknowledge my unusually strong spirit. I begin to understand why I belong in an asylum because I’m too smart and too strong for my own good. I was a nihilist, but now probably an ascetic.

  6. Leslie

    Louise has a good point but an important thing to realize is that children won’t always tell you when they’re unhappy and sadly that is part of the growing rate of suicide in teens and even pre-teens. Parents have to be aware without being told and also have to DO something about their concerns instead of ignoring specific behaviors because they don’t want to believe something may be wrong or because they figure it will “go away” or the child will “simply outgrow” it. Having dealt with this “syndrom” with one of my own children I can solidly say that an important part of the process is tons of patience, another is acceptance and most importantly never “underestimate” the power of a child’s mind. These kids have plenty of empathy they just show it in different ways or are sometimes unsure of how to show it.

  7. Dean P.

    It is not always practical to give a 500 word essay whenever something needs to be described. As a result terms like ‘disorder’ are used to describe conditions that are atypical to the population .

  8. Mike K

    You wouldn’t give someone autism or aspergers and call it a gift. Its evasive of the issue.

  9. It is a gift when these kids have access to people like themselves and support to be themselves not simply conform, conformity and autism are polar opposites. People with autism don’t want to see the world like those without, why would you trade a rich experience for one less colourful? It is regular people who don’t understand other ways of thinking not people with autism, they are painfully aware of difference and put through pain often on purpose to make them normal.The way to make people with autism socially comfortable is to offer them a society of people like themselves to fit into. When non autistic people say they should learn to be like everyone else it shows the most profound lack of understanding and empathy, like everyone should be the same because sheep aspire to be sheep, what other animals are there? Why would you choose a black and white world over extreme colour? It is the people who think differently who change the world, not those who think the same. Autism is important for the survival of the human race IMHO.

  10. Interesting article and interesting comments above. My son has aspergers and so do I. I have a blog called Everyday Aspergers that shares the female with Aspergers experience. I agree with some of the comments listed about being able to see through the surface games of society and manipulation and such. And I am finding more and more women who share Aspergers traits, hundreds in fact. It seems to becoming more of a typical experience or “norm” for some reason. I believe it is a gift, but also filled with huge challenges in thought, behavior, action, and processing, and especially in finding a way to “fit in” and feel safe in a world that is ever changing and unpredictable. I also, in my experience, find women with ASD to have not only grand empathy, but extreme compassion and depth. My hope is that our differences and authentic uniqueness are accepted by society as a whole.

  11. spectrum…a range but we are still thinking one gene, one protein..and we still fall for one gene, one trait. ain’t so. so we go from genes to spectrum of some 27 genes interacting with the total developmental environment and why would anyone to expect similar outcomes? why expect similarity on some scale at the expense ofbpolar opposites? thus some are blessed and some curssed by the “same” “condition.” this should not be any surprise.v except to preconceptions.

  12. Mickey

    Aspbergers is still a disorder though….

    • Technically the ability to walk upright, speak and think were once disorders, If a disorder just means different from the range of behaviours considered normal for a species. People with AS tend not to conform to societal expectations of normality, why should this be considered a bad thing? If it is really harmful to the individual it will die out naturally. I would hate for anyone to find a cure, I would hate to be like a normal person. Sure having AS sucks sometimes but that is usually because of pressure to fit in, not anything to do with AS traits themselves.

  13. Mickey

    And on the whole collective “we need autism to survive” are you stupid? By believing everything in this post as if a scientist who knows everything posted it, You are exactly what you are calling everyone else, a fucking sheep. Want to know how animals evolve and continue on? They kill off their kin wtih undesirable traits, and keep those with the traits that show the most strength and survivability. Because the spread of undesirable traits means the population of that species will degrade and eventually die out. Thats what evolution is, and personally im all for finding a way to cure aspbergers, and other autistic disorders mainly because these aren’t normal, they are mutations, just because every genome is unique doesnt mean that makes every genome normal. Mutations are real and should be dealt with as such

    • Jack

      Every child is a mutation of their parents. Exact copies don’t exist except in cloning.

  14. waltinseattle

    spectrum….a range, and not necessarily just to one pole. as stated in post, some asd “sufferers” cant read emotion, can’t read body language. is it just that they like to get conned? dont care about being used? do they accept this because they dont care to be normative? some “gift!” the other end of the spectrum is perhaps the hyper sensitivity of squizoid which Curbina describes. one trait and a spectrum from debilitating to spectacular. and this before other traits, before forming self image and sense of self esteem in response to others who ridicule stigmaize medicate or love coddle protect from “reality out there.”

    note that asd is increasingly diagnosed and more prevalent among higher income parents. we also note thst many brag of the childrens’ diagnosis as if it is unquestionably a positive. high i.q. special. better.

    or maybe too much is sometimes not good. perhaps not too much not too little but just enough. ..just right…as goldilocks realized.

    once upon the pliestocene we had good vision…or died off.now we have prosthsis- glases. and the dusorder floyrishes. perhaps we no longer have a harsh darwinian selection for asd also. and successful parents can afford children who set locked in private worlds and repetitive ritusluzed jestures. or afford the less disabled who play with numbers in private associal musings and might someday be great coders. all i know is that such genius makes terrible customer service and drives me mad by not understanding ” does not work, is unstable, prints at a place other than where the cursor appears…” and demands to see each problem because words mean nothing there only understanding coming from direct manipulation snd personsl confrontation with the problem.. ” oh that” “yes, that…just what i SAID” Then walks away snd does nothing except stay disengaged. a normative person understsnds words as well as direct experience and csn “cope” with people. some ads are not so “gifted” that way. and asd is no guarantee or prerequisite for scientific accomplishment. it does seems to favor the repetitive, recursive nature of coding. it does poorly at the overall program designing.

    but that is just one dimension and one end of the spectrum. …was tesla asd? einstien, plato? planke? helmholtz?

    • Pridewithoutprejudice

      @Waltinseattle what disturbing ravings of jealousy and prejudice, I hope you are being treated for narcissism and borderline personality issues as well as basic literacy issues. I hope you get the help you require. ‘asds’ are people, something I hope you will turn into, a person, with some serious help. Also, ever heard of addressing the topic in hand, and yes, Einstein was on the spectrum, and also dyslexic. Einstein literally saw the world differently and changed it…I am sorry you can’t understand what the article was saying and missed the point. I am too tired of your type to explain it, but shall say it is hard to hear a lecture on people skills with your evident lack of said skills.

  15. waltinseattle

    @ pride & prejudice. i stand behind my ideas and apologize for the dumbphone which makes editing a monumental pain. i have experience to back up all my inflamatory non p.c. stances. you think my calling it like i see it means i have no empathy? that is your issue not mine. want to discuss the issues or just rise to a false “offense.”? signed…a rather manic…with more in the family still surviving. you know squat my personal situation…but if you care…comeback…

  16. Pingback: Aspergers as Evolution | Being Bipolar Podcast

  17. riane21c

    My ex partner is an Asperger’s guy and it was never a problem to me as I actually admired his intelligence greatly and saw his Aspi quirks as quite delightful really. Luckily I am a secure and not emotionally needy person, so the fact he was not in touch with such things very deeply didn’t cause any problems at all. I like Aspi people..a lot :)

  18. forgot to mention. I also realised Aspergers people now and throughout history have used their amazing genius to add so much to the advancement and major changes in this world. Bill Gates for example.

  19. PonFarr

    Here is a clip from an artical I hope can or will help others with proper understanding of evolution.
    “When making decisions, these physiological signals (or ‘somatic markers’) and their evoked emotion are consciously or unconsciously associated with their past outcomes and bias decision-making towards certain behaviors while avoiding others.[16] For instance, when a somatic marker associated with a positive outcome is perceived, the person may feel happy and motivated to pursue that behavior. When a somatic marker associated with the negative outcome is perceived, the person may feel sad and the emotion may act as an internal alarm to warn the individual to avoid a course of action. These situation-specific somatic states based on, and reinforced by, past experiences help to guide behavior in favor of more advantageous choices and therefore are adaptive. “

  20. stephen

    The Autism spectrum, by definition encompasses all people with what society calls ‘dysfunctional.’

    At one end of the spectrum we have severely socially handicapped individuals, that will never integrate fully into so-called normal society,
    But I’m assuming here we are discussing higher functioning autism, e.g.- Albert Einstein,- Steve jobs,- Plato, Leonardo da Vinci,- Copernicus, etc etc, in fact a plethora of geniuses, that were classified to be in the higher functioning autism spectrum, only with new techniques of diagnosis can we be certain now that these great people were indeed so-called inflicted with the genes responsible for autism, that simply had different thought patterns to the rest of society, perhaps these individuals are ultimately responsible for how mainstream society functions today, and the so-called ‘normal sections of society’ (the sheep) simply follow alternative thinkers like these!

    these realisations in recent years, has led to the discovery that more and more children and adults are now being diagnosed with some form of spectrum disorder, under various different names. whether mainstream society finds this offensive or simply a gift to humanity, is open conjecture.

    Take for instance ‘aspergers syndrome’ they do find it hard to integrate into so-called normal society, this is because they cannot relate to a society which finds every day trivia, that so-called normal people find interesting and stimulating? interesting at all!

    Unfortunately the parents and professionally academically indoctrinated, in our society, that simply aren’t part of the spectrum, seem to have the idea that these individuals want to be part of THEIR society, when nothing could be further from the truth, and tend to simply make their autistic children unhappy, by suggesting they are failures by not simply wanting to integrate with people they cannot relate to, and they them! perhaps mainstream society now should accommodate the ever-growing army of individuals that simply find assimilating into a society where the majority think all alike rather uncomfortable and should now be accepted as simply individuals with individual ideas and dreams,

    Perhaps if there’s enough of them they may be our saviours, considering today’s normal society is in such a state of disarray can they really point the finger of disapproval when just look at what so-called normal people are doing today to our world!

    They tend to seek like-minded individuals to interact with, to share their experiences, and their view of the world, and in my opinion are not apathetic, or disconnected at all, quite the contrary, but interact on a altogether completely different level from what Nero typical sections of society find so socially imperative?

  21. stephen

    A interesting piece that may indirectly link with autism or perceived autism, and especially since the above article has indicated a gene difference in high functioning autism.
    or perhaps it is merely pseudoscience, or wishful thinking I’m not sure? or perhaps not connected at all….. I leave it to the readers to decide, but interesting all the same;

    http://www.psyking.net/id218.htm

  22. The reason why it gets labeled as a disorder is because individuals within this spectrum find it incredibly difficult to form emotional relationships, especial the kind that leads to procreation. in a sense these individuals as wonderful as they might be on a one to one level are genetically doomed. Even if they have children they often do not have the capacity to raise their own children without the intervention of outside resources.

  23. Nicely put FlashInfo. It is a spectrum and it runs from highly messed up to highly gifted. We do have to ask if it is a new situation or if it is an old genetic state now getting noticed. I favor the second, and believe these minds did Maya Calendar, Navigation maps etc in far distant times. The severe ones were somehow integrated or disposed. The genes survived through the utility of the high achievers. Thus no “next evolutionary steps” are forthcoming except perhaps (and still this is very significant) through social, not genetic selections.. They will continue advances vis polymath minds. They will prosper. Darwins Dangerous Idea will survive and we need no tlelelogical intervention from Gaia or God whom is/are prescient and “guiding” our destiny. and NO SKY HOOKS REQUIRED!

  24. I think people tend to get too emotional about such things. Asperges or Autism might require special care, special classrooms, teachers and carers, who are provided but the State. If it were not so, parents would not be able to pay all the bills.
    I strongly disagree with the idea that this wide group of people would be “the ones”, as much as I disapprove of any prejudice against them.
    Gifted people exist in all shapes, sizes and societies and some of them show their talents quite early. Mozart was gifted, to mention one nobody can disagree. He also was the son of a musician. There might have been some genetical inheritance, and there certainly was the opportunity to learn and play an instrument. There are some gifted children who are extremely poor and don’t have the medium they need to produce. Special, gifted people are those who make it possible as well.
    Special and gifted people are currently researching ways to deal, help and integrate us all, because no matter how you feel about it, men are social animals and don’t thrive by themselves in nature.

  25. Michael Jacobs

    ‘[...] the most recent evidence indicates a common group of genes whose variations make an individual more vulnerable to developing ASD’. Almost a century has passed since Heisenberg discovered the existence of a direct link between the observer and the experience of the observer. Yet, in a profit-driven effort to objectify and control the physical world, government-sponsored scientists still make statements like the above. Taking into account that Human Beings create their own reality, it must be reversed a full 180 degrees: ‘people who behave with what is known as ASD seem to have developed a certain common group of genes’.

  26. waltinseattle

    that last whopper sounds like Lysenko-ism does it not! the autists created the genes. nature follows human intent..genes fulfill desire. wowsers

  27. Jack

    In response to the article:

    Life occupies all the possible space that it can in the most efficient way that it can. Birds inhabit the sky only because of the speed of flight that allows them to travel further to find food and escape predators. There is a bell curve scale for every possible combination and condition of life. The condition of “humanity” is genetic and not restricted to homo-sapiens.
    Most species exist only in relationship with other species. Some as predator/prey, some as symbiotic and some both. Homo-sapiens that genetically can no longer nurture themselves as adults will either cease to exist or become part of a symbiotic relationship. They must satisfy some need that other homo-sapiens have, whether it be purely humanitarian, for companionship or for an extra ability that others do not posses.
    In a similar way those that occupy the extreme end of the field of aggression find themselves contained in gaol systems or die in gang or crime violence, or become needed by society on the battlefields fighting other aggressors from other countries.
    Just as those that inhabit the extreme ends of the physical spectrum have been subject to many different pressures throughout history, those at the extreme ends of the mental spectrum have mostly been passed over by natural selection.
    However time and pressure can do strange and wonderful things. There is no limit to the possibilities of evolution. To think of an albatross gliding over the southern ocean is to see the possibility of a flying dragon, although maybe not a fire breathing one. It is very possible that mentally diverse groups could evolve into a range of other species. Can you imagine what the class system in India would look like in ten million years if it had continued to diversify? Or even the diversification in a modern western city over the same period? A sub species of tax collectors for example. Of course at the moment that seems impossible because a modern city is far too unstable and evidence suggests that homo-sapiens breeding habits tend not to be confined to groups. But it is possible!
    Those mentally extreme individuals that “code” posses the ability to focus intensely. Maybe others have or will develop the ability to navigate just as the birds do and lead us into space exploration. It appears that diversification is definitely happening in some fields but at the same time unification in others. Both evolution and dis-evolution.
    In this recent four hundred year period of extreme homo-sapiens population explosion might we consider that those individuals that feel the natural desire to procreate past the pigeon pair as being more disordered due to the burden that they place on other homo-sapiens, other species and to the planet as a whole. In two hundred years time how will this group be viewed? Ultimately it will be the environment that shapes whether the homo-sapiens species will diversify or unify because it has not yet learned to limit the space that it occupies.

    • waltinseattle

      Jack…have you read the wonderfull book ” Darwins Dangerous Idea” ? you describe rvolution very nicrly, if somewhat in a condensed way.

      what bothers me in new age circles is the acceptance of teleological actions. destiny by evolutionary “goals” is religious destiny with gaia replacing jehovah. and no more acceptable.

      and filling any availsble new niche is how this blind process has “evolved” to where we can trade ideas via silicon wafers and electric currents. this ability has no bearing on some imagined next step of doing it without the devices. nor did toolmaking prefigure growing fang nor hoe .

      • Jack

        Thank you for the recommendation, I shall endeavor.
        So what is acceptable?
        The fleas have out grown the dog and there’s no other dog just yet. This space ship is currently the only one we have. World fish stocks are estimated to be in decline since 1988 and I believe this not because it is from some media source but because I spend a lot of time on the ocean and have observed it first hand over a 40 year period. Did the Easter Islanders know their world would radically change five years before the event? I’m pretty sure some of them did, but not the majority.
        I sometimes wonder that we call ourselves intelligent at all. Consciousness is like a locomotive, once it is built it has to go somewhere. No good sitting idle, it will just fade away.
        Looking forward down that line for it’s own reason, no other.
        Consciousness is a tool for survival, nothing more. It has nothing to do with actual living. A bunch of cells self replicating and existing harmoniously together is what living is and the corals of the ocean do that just as well as what we do. Consciousness is an equation, x circumstances in the past equals y circumstances in the future. Reflection and projection for the self fulfilled need of survival. Stepping off this gravy train removes the genetic code that would reduce the urgency of survival in each generation.
        That life is now exploring what consciousness is, is logical. Homo-sapiens have built a world for themselves. The limestone structure that houses the corals evolved to become internal in ourselves, and now we mimmic that ancient shelter on land building house and the rest of infrastructure. This safe environment is now ripe for diversity within. So we get crack houses and nasa scientists, ASDs that endlessly search for the slightest chance for survival and big brother reality shows where the mindless aspire to be the perfect homo-sapien. The list goes on and on. And we are sold the idea of happiness like a carrot leading the donkey. Is coral happy? Living in bliss? No it’s just living, at peace, or in stress or somewhere in between. Stress is the ultimate driver of all action. How much time is left before the individual will not be able to prosper without the latest iphone.
        ASD is not a disorder, it’s the norm in a crazy world. Just as normal as drug addiction, rocket science, war between corals and a moth that disguises itself as a thorn in the Amazon rain forest. We all have a chemical floating around in our system that creates a desire to survive and procreate. You either achieve that goal or you don’t. ASDs just like everybody else are searching for a way to achieve these desires. They live with a very short fuse and extreme levels of stress. They will direct all their attention to the very one thing that they believe will secure their future. If this one thing is disrupted to them it feels like death itself. Catatonia results when there is no belief in survival and the chemical responsible for those desires ceases to flow. Well that’s my best guess.

        • Jack: “Reflection and projection for the self fulfilled need of survival”….” Stress is the ultimate driver of all action.” Pretty much my view except maybe our definitions of stress. I see consciousness as a grand way to survive. That is all the brain really is good for. The rest is stress relief. The sort of stress you refer to I think. But hunger, need for companionship thirst…these are “stresses also, and in a hierarchy. I think some over stressed folk get the hierarchy all wrong. Druggies certainly do. Improper communication with those neurohormones- (oxytocin,) and the reward transmitter chemicals. The Taoists ratwe the way natural “dumb” life is. They merely accept conditions and do what they can to lessen the stress, assure survival. we, with thoughts of the future are different. We worry about the lion tomorrow, the possible lack of food next week. If we could get over these fears and just deal with what is…not bliss but equanimity, the present…as good as it can get.

          The catatonia observation is good too. My eldest had some issues, undiagnosed. long term plans did not happen though he was normal in the moment to moment category. More manic depressive. He did not choose catatonia but did shoot himself after a disasterous manic episode that took 5 others to their graves. Anger, will to live? who could ever reconstruct it. But as we get farther from the old world, there will definately be more room for those not so average.

          Easter Island. I have this picture of perfect employment as every man woman and child was looking for food. and some were still saying : “look, no unemployment, don’t worry, with everybody out there food will be found, it always has..” some don’t ever get the big picture or the long term perspective I think my son had both in excess..between seeing down the road and his own issues, it was not a journey he was ready to keep making.

          So we really do need to keep an open mind. It was not a simpleton brain, it was a polymath…who figured out the calendars we still are amazed by. Guys were probably lousy hunters anyway. maybe they went into inventing things like atl atl and the bow?

  28. Pingback: Autism Advocacy and Awareness: Part II | Sprocket Ink

  29. Robert

    Sorry, but I will not subscribe to any theory that suggests an autism disorder is an advantageous trait. If everyone was autistic homo sapiens would cease to exist. The magical thing about our species is that most individuals born with maladaptive traits are nurtured. Autism in any other species would not survive. We are a very special species and because we love our children and want them to succeed, we assist those born with maladaptive traits to reach their full potential. The interesting thing is that likely because autism causes such widespread havoc in certain areas of the brain, other parts of the brain compensate with specialized growth. One day we might see an autistic person with a very specialized skill develop a way to reach other habitable planets or cure death. But that would happen only when that person is provided with a tremendous amount of support in their early critical years of growth. Sorry, but the bottom line is that autism is maladaptive and survival cannot happen without drawing a more substantial amount of resources than the average individual.

Leave a Reply

CE Magazine

Subscribe to CE Magazine Monthly For Exclusive Content!

Watch SIRIUS!

Yekra Player

Yekra is a revolutionary new distribution network for feature films.

Sirius

“Sirius” is a feature length documentary that follows Dr. Steven Greer – an Emergency Medicine doctor turned UFO/ New Energy researcher – as he struggles to disclose top secret information about classified energy & propulsion techniques. Along the way, Dr. Greer investigates new technology and sheds light on criminal suppression. He accumulates over 100 Government, Military, and Intelligence Community witnesses who testify on record about their first-hand experiences with UFOs and with the cover-up.

In the course of his research Dr. Greer is asked to look at an amazing find: a humanoid specimen, 6 inches long from the Atacama Desert. Not until 2012 was he given permission to take bone samples and DNA from the specimen. At that same time a pre-eminent geneticist, hearing of this find, offered to do DNA testing. He enlisted an MD from the same university,- world renowned for his work with skeletal anomalies, to view the x-rays and CT scans. Their expertise along with Dr. Greer’s expansive knowledge of the subject bring more questions than answers. Where did this “Atacama Humanoid” come from? Are there others like it? What does it say about the origin of the human species?

While on this odyssey, the audience gains a whole new perspective on technology, human evolution, and clandestine organizations who have manipulated and controlled the public for centuries.

Watch Our Documentaries!

The Collective Evolution The Collective Evolution II

CE Radio

Listen to internet radio with CE Radio on Blog Talk Radio

We Recommend

www.truththeory.com www.consciouslifenews.com
  Love us on Facebook to keep up-to-date with our latest insights, content, and quotes. Join the discussion and share your thoughts with our like-minded community! Click here to subscribe to the CE Magazine for exclusive content! CE Mag is digital so it's eco-friendly.