The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal

artificial sugarDid you know that Aspartame was banned by the FDA twice? How is this product legal now?

The bittersweet argument over whether Aspartame is safe or not has been going on for a long time. On one side we have medical evidence that suggests we should avoid using it and on the other side we lean on the FDA’s approval that suggests it is safe. Since generally that seems to be the factor that many continue to hold trust based upon, I thought we could look into the Aspartame story to find out how it came to be accepted as safe by the FDA. You would think that something so widely used and so well accepted would have quite the pristine story leading to its acceptance. I imagine one will discover otherwise after reading this post.

It all starts in the mid 1960′s with a company called G.D. Searle. One of their chemists accidentally creates aspartame while trying to create a cure for stomach ulcers. Searle decides to put aspartame through a testing process which eventually leads to its approval by the FDA. Not long after, serious health effects begin to arise and G.D. Searle comes under fire for their testing practices. It is revealed that the testing process of Aspartame was among the worst the investigators had ever seen and that in fact the product was unsafe for use. Aspartame triggers the first criminal investigation of a manufacturer put into place by the FDA in 1977. By 1980 the FDA bans aspartame from use after having 3 independent scientists study the sweetener. It was determined that one main health effects was that it had a high chance of inducing brain tumors. At this point it was clear that aspartame was not fit to be used in foods and banned is where it stayed, but not for long.

Early in 1981 Searle Chairman Donald Rumsfeld (who is a former Secretary of Defense.. surprise surprise) vowed to “call in his markers,” to get it approved. January 21, 1981, the day after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration, Searle took the steps to re-apply aspartame’s approval for use by the FDA. Ronald Reagans’ new FDA commissioner Arthur Hayes Hull, Jr., appointed a 5-person Scientific Commission to review the board of inquiry’s decision. It did not take long for the panel to decide 3-2 in favor of maintaining the ban of aspartame. Hull then decided to appoint a 6th member to the board, which created a tie in the voting, 3-3. Hull then decided to personally break the tie and approve aspartame for use. Hull later left the FDA under allegations of impropriety, served briefly as Provost at New York Medical College, and then took a position with Burston-Marsteller. Burstone-Marstella is the chief public relations firm for both Monsanto and GD Searle. Since that time he has never spoken publicly about aspartame.

It is clear to this point that if anything the safety of aspartame is incredibly shaky.  It has already been through a process of being banned and without the illegitimate un-banning of the product, it would not be being used today. Makes you wonder how much corruption and money was involved with names like Rumsfeld, Reagan and Hull involved so heavily. In 1985, Monsanto decides to purchase the aspartame patent from G.D. Searle. Remember that Arthur Hull now had the connection to Monsanto. Monsanto did not seem too concerned with the past challenges and ugly image aspartame had based on its past. I personally find this comical as Monsanto’s products are banned in many countries and of all companies to buy the product they seem to fit best as they are champions of producing incredibly unsafe and untested products and making sure they stay in the market place.

Since then, aspartame has been under a lot of attack by scientists, doctors, chemists and consumers about it’s safety and neurotoxic properties. Piles of comprehensive studies have been completed that show aspartame is a cause for over 90 serious health problems such as cancer, leukemia, headaches, seizures, fibromyalgia, and epilepsy just to name a few. We have written several articles discussing various affects of aspartame. Aspartame Leukemia Link. Aspartame and Brain Damage.

For a full timeline on aspartame’s legal and safety battles, expand the box below.

Timeline

December 1965– While working on an ulcer drug, James Schlatter, a chemist at G.D. Searle, accidentally discovers aspartame, a substance that is 180 times sweeter than sugar yet has no calories.

Spring 1967– Searle begins the safety tests on aspartame that are necessary for applying for FDA approval of food additives.

Fall 1967– Dr. Harold Waisman, a biochemist at the University of Wisconsin, conducts aspartame safety tests on infant monkeys on behalf of the Searle Company. Of the seven monkeys that were being fed aspartame mixed with milk, one dies and five others have grand mal seizures.

November 1970– Cyclamate, the reigning low-calorie artificial sweetener — is pulled off the market after some scientists associate it with cancer. Questions are also raised about safety of saccharin, the only other artificial sweetener on the market, leaving the field wide open for aspartame.

December 18, 1970– Searle Company executives lay out a “Food and Drug Sweetener Strategy’ that they feel will put the FDA into a positive frame of mind about aspartame. An internal policy memo describes psychological tactics the company should use to bring the FDA into a subconscious spirit of participation” with them on aspartame and get FDA regulators into the “habit of saying, “Yes”.”

Spring 1971– Neuroscientist Dr. John Olney (whose pioneering work with monosodium glutamate was responsible for having it removed from baby foods) informs Searle that his studies show that aspartic acid (one of the ingredients of aspartame) caused holes in the brains of infant mice. One of Searle’s own researchers confirmed Dr. Olney’s findings in a similar study.

February 1973– After spending tens of millions of dollars conducting safety tests, the G.D. Searle Company applies for FDA approval and submits over 100 studies they claim support aspartame’s safety.

March 5, 1973– One of the first FDA scientists to review the aspartame safety data states that “the information provided (by Searle) is inadequate to permit an evaluation of the potential toxicity of aspartame”. She says in her report that in order to be certain that aspartame is safe, further clinical tests are needed.

May 1974– Attorney, Jim Turner (consumer advocate who was instrumental in getting cyclamate taken off the market) meets with Searle representatives to discuss Dr. Olney’s 1971 study which showed that aspartic acid caused holes in the brains of infant mice.

July 26, 1974– The FDA grants aspartame its first approval for restricted use in dry foods.

August 1974– Jim Turner and Dr. John Olney file the first objections against aspartame’s approval.

March 24, 1976– Turner and Olney’s petition triggers an FDA investigation of the laboratory practices of aspartame’s manufacturer, G.D. Searle. The investigation finds Searle’s testing procedures shoddy, full of inaccuracies and “manipulated” test data. The investigators report they “had never seen anything as bad as Searle’s testing.”

January 10, 1977– The FDA formally requests the U.S. Attorney’s office to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and “concealing material facts and making false statements” in aspartame safety tests. This is the first time in the FDA’s history that they request a criminal investigation of a manufacturer.

January 26, 1977– While the grand jury probe is underway, Sidley & Austin, the law firm representing Searle, begins job negotiations with the U.S. Attorney in charge of the investigation, Samuel Skinner.

March 8, 1977– G. D. Searle hires prominent Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld as the new CEO to try to turn the beleaguered company around. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld brings in several of his Washington cronies as top management.

July 1, 1977– Samuel Skinner leaves the U.S. Attorney’s office and takes a job with Searle’s law firm. (see Jan. 26th)

August 1, 1977– The Bressler Report, compiled by FDA investigators and headed by Jerome Bressler, is released. The report finds that 98 of the 196 animals died during one of Searle’s studies and weren’t autopsied until later dates, in some cases over one year after death. Many other errors and inconsistencies are noted. For example, a rat was reported alive, then dead, then alive, then dead again; a mass, a uterine polyp, and ovarian neoplasms were found in animals but not reported or diagnosed in Searle’s reports.

December 8, 1977– U.S. Attorney Skinner’s withdrawal and resignation stalls the Searle grand jury investigation for so long that the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges runs out. The grand jury investigation is dropped.

June 1, 1979– The FDA established a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) to rule on safety issues surrounding NutraSweet.

September 30, 1980– The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it “has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive.”

January 1981– Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, states in a sales meeting that he is going to make a big push to get aspartame approved within the year. Rumsfeld says he will use his political pull in Washington, rather than scientific means, to make sure it gets approved.

January 21, 1981– Ronald Reagan is sworn in as President of the United States. Reagan’s transition team, which includes Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle, hand picks Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner.

March, 1981– An FDA commissioner’s panel is established to review issues raised by the Public Board of Inquiry.

May 19, 1981– Three of six in-house FDA scientists who were responsible for reviewing the brain tumor issues, Dr. Robert Condon, Dr. Satya Dubey, and Dr. Douglas Park, advise against approval of NutraSweet, stating on the record that the Searle tests are unreliable and not adequate to determine the safety of aspartame.

July 15, 1981– In one of his first official acts, Dr. Arthur Hayes Jr., the new FDA commissioner, overrules the Public Board of Inquiry, ignores the recommendations of his own internal FDA team and approves NutraSweet for dry products. Hayes says that aspartame has been shown to be safe for its’ proposed uses and says few compounds have withstood such detailed testing and repeated close scrutiny.

October 15, 1982– The FDA announces that Searle has filed a petition that aspartame be approved as a sweetener in carbonated beverages and other liquids.

July 1, 1983– The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) urges the FDA to delay approval of aspartame for carbonated beverages pending further testing because aspartame is very unstable in liquid form. When liquid aspartame is stored in temperatures above 85 degrees Fahrenheit, it breaks down into DKP and formaldehyde, both of which are known toxins.

July 8, 1983– The National Soft Drink Association drafts an objection to the final ruling which permits the use of aspartame in carbonated beverages and syrup bases and requests a hearing on the objections. The association says that Searle has not provided responsible certainty that aspartame and its’ degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks.

August 8, 1983– Consumer Attorney, Jim Turner of the Community Nutrition Institute and Dr. Woodrow Monte, Arizona State University’s Director of Food Science and Nutritional Laboratories, file suit with the FDA objecting to aspartame approval based on unresolved safety issues.

September, 1983– FDA Commissioner Hayes resigns under a cloud of controversy about his taking unauthorized rides aboard a General Foods jet. (General foods is a major customer of NutraSweet) Burson-Marsteller, Searle’s public relation firm (which also represented several of NutraSweet’s major users), immediately hires Hayes as senior scientific consultant.

Fall 1983– The first carbonated beverages containing aspartame are sold for public consumption.

November 1984– Center for Disease Control (CDC) “Evaluation of consumer complaints related to aspartame use.” (summary by B. Mullarkey)

November 3, 1987– U.S. hearing, “NutraSweet: Health and Safety Concerns,” Committee on Labor and Human Resources, Senator Howard Metzenbaum, chairman.

Sources:

http://www.sweetpoison.com/aspartame-side-effects.html

http://rense.com/general33/legal.htm

http://dorway.com/

Related Posts

147 comments on “The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal

  1. be healthy

    Great article and info here. I know there can be a lot of argument about aspartame out there but i think if people knew this it would make it a lot harder to continue to defend something that really makes no sense to be consuming.
    thx!

  2. Julane

    The information here is excellent and I have read about this myself in past years. However, the grammar problems may detract credibility from the content.

    • WRS71

      Agreed. I’ll have less difficulty taking the information seriously if it’s presented without spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors. Please take this into consideration when proofreading your work before publishing it.

      • Mr. Mark

        Are you serious???? Have a diet soda. Maybe that’ll clear things up for you…

        • haley

          Yes, Mr. Mark, we’re serious. Grammar matters if you want to come off as legitimate.

        • R

          our son has been a diabetic since he was 4 all our health care providers recomended products containing artificial sweeteners. When he first began having seizures in his late teens, first question asked? is he diabetic. Drs. are hesitant to relate his seizures to aspartame. Why I wonder

      • haley

        Completely agree. If you’re publishing anything to the internet beyond your personal blog, you should have enough respect for language as a whole to proofread your articles. Unless you want us to “collectively evolve” backward into illiteracy.

    • Lori

      Also when bringing in political bias – especially when the liberals have the most corrupt, lying government in history presently in power – also leaves a bad aspartame like taste in ones mouth. Even forgiving the bad grammar, I would have accepted your report more easily if presented without the petty digs to further a personal agenda.

      • cindy

        It is petty for people to be offended because of the political names involved. If they are involved it is NOT a politically biased to bring it to light. That is how corruption in government goes unchecked – when people are soooo biased to their own political agenda they ignore what “their” favorite politicians do as if they were not involved. Face the fact that it was those who used their political power to influence FDA policies in the wrong way.

        • I would not say that is petty, unless there is no merit in what one is saying, but Lori is right. It is NOT petty to call shenanigans when they are so blatantly obvious. As this article is, the truth is stretched a lot to make Reagan’s role seem more front-line in this. He was merely elected president at this time, and appointed someone to the head of the FDA. The author makes it seem like Reagan was involved in conspiring to force feed aspartame into people’s mouths.

          “Makes you wonder how much corruption and money was involved with names like Rumsfeld, Reagan and Hull involved so heavily.” –that is just a line of BS. Reagan may not have known Hull’s corruption or connection to aspartame. Reagan had a problem with departments like the FDA, and ideologically opposed their existence, as they are an abuse of government, and Reagan was constantly fighting the liberal congress about government stretching its greedy paws too far. In all likelihood, Reagan was probably lied to about the studies and the process, showing the too far reaching hand of government within the FDA, banning substances and restricting businesses in a corrupt and tyrannical way -which is correct.

          The story above is not complete anyway, there are more people and events involved behind aspartame and how it was approved. First off, it was not accidentally made, it was made on purpose -it was accidentally tasted, and believed to be non-toxic. They had to get rid of the popular alternative sweetener of the time first by propaganda. I believe that was cyclamate, and is one case of corruption where a substance is banned by an overreaching government because they had better corporate interests and backroom deals with GD Searle -not because of alleged connections with the GOP.

          Ephedrine is another substance banned by the FDA because of the dangers of ridiculous use and excessive consumption, but used normally can eliminate the need for inhalers -the FDA has better corporate interests in Big Pharmacy to keep those inhalers rolling off the line. It’s always ban one thing to make way for another. When companies get into this kind of relationship with a government branch -especially one that was created to inherit powers from congress and yet avoid all the checks and balances congress itself must endure- the problem we have there is not political ideology, it is corporatism. Corporatism has nothing to do with free market principles, conservatism, or the GOP, but everything to do with greedy politicians and too big government -the thing caused by progressives/liberals/socialists. Reagan, in fighting government growth, may not have known he was helping to clear the way for a substance that was bad for people, so saying he was heavily involved is more than speculation or conjecture; it is a lie. And it is petty.

      • Michele

        Sweetheart it was a republican president that approved it. Liberals are fighting to get it banned!! Spelling isn’t the issue..its the fact that its causing huge health issues..focus people.

        • Jerrith

          I swear every article I read nowadays there are people who love to comment and draw that line in the sand over which party did what. When will you learn that neither side is good for us Americans. It’s time we stop support them all together and start thinking for all of us a whole. This stuff causes so many issues, I’m glad I was keen on what it does and cut it out years ago.

          • red

            Agreed.Political parties are more dangerous than any artificial sweetener.

            I do have a question,though, If aspartame is as poisonous as claimed,and it’s in hundreds of products used by millions of people every day,shouldn’t we be dropping off like flies? Not trying to be argumentative,I’m just a skeptic of claims made by anyone. We can see direct correlations between smoking and lung cancer, or alcohol and cirrhosis. Where is the direct correlation between aspartame and fatality other than claims that it’s bad for you?

      • RaNae

        Bottom line…The names mentioned were involved, can’t take it back now like it or not. The sweetner is not good to consume on any level period.

      • angie

        Great to know others have reacted terribly to that taste of poison on a stick ( that’s the only way I can describe it ) It is revolting. Also Thank you for the information so well presented and outlined. However I am HAPPY to proof-read your work for you anytime !

      • b

        The worst ever? You don’t find it strange that Rumsfeld gets these positions, and has been apart of it all for over 40 years? You must be a stay at home mom, who follows fox news very well, get lost useless!!!

    • reza ray

      so many scientists whose second language is english and are not fluent in language but expert in their fields of study . if you have problem with their grammar , you have bigger problems . see a Dr.

  3. Penny

    Why am I not surprised that the FDA approves this stuff. When you look at the other nonsense they approve, one can’t be too shocked. Thanks for the info on this one.
    As for grammar, didn’t notice too much but in the end so long as the message is understood and we keep an open mind, it shouldn’t matter :)

  4. Victoria

    Absolutely, Julane.

  5. teresa reilly

    Thank you for this information, I have never trusted these people and their so called tests as the result is to serve the purpose ofin lining their pockets.

  6. Bernadette

    It’s all about the money if they can make money they sell it

  7. Pingback: AnimalFarm.org » The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal http://t.co/Hi2hhBmP #uspoli #p1 #health #cancer #FDA #USA #p2 #cdnpoli #auspol #ows #nwo

  8. I never understand why people get so worked up over things like Aspartame. Listen, the information about the pros and cons is out there so for those who want to make educated decisions can. Nobody is forcing you to drink diet soda or other items with Aspartame. People need to take accountability for what they put in their body and stop assuming the government is giving them all the answers. Stop living in the dark and do something for yourself and stop complaining.

    • Jason

      Totally disagree. The lone person does not have the expertise, knowledge, funding, etc. to study whether or not a drug or food product is harmful to their health. Even with the FDA out there testing products, a person is up against a huge arsenal of weapons a company can use to create misinformation. They can hire their own scientists to ‘study’ their products and release incomplete or very tainted studies that show their product is real. Often these studies are published without mentioning who funded them. For consumers to protect ourselves, we have to pool our resources and fund organizations and agencies like the FDA to be non-biased in their regulatory approach. They need a mandate to ban harmful substances precisely because of the potential misinformation food and drug companies can release. F&D companies will spend countless dollars on advertising to promote their potentially harmful products, and a regulator without the power to ban substances would not have the funding the combat every F&D company’s wrong assertion in the media.

      That being said, it is a shame that we can’t always trust our regulators to be non-biased. However, I would challenge you to find a better solution that doesn’t involve you checking the label of every product you buy, googling its ingredients, and reading ‘both sides of the story’.

      • Dave

        As a person who tries to live their life with common sense as much as possible …i have consumed products with Aspartame, and have gotten headaches each time… on a more basic note…. Aspartame IS NOT a natural substance it IS a chemical, and therefore is not good for us period…. why does the argument need to go beyond that?
        Someone is making money and someone else is making money from that person to keep this product in the marketplace…period…. lets get real its how the system works PERIOD..!!!!

        • james kite

          Chemicals are natural.

          Natural does not mean safe.

          How any chemical interacts with its environment is what is of concern and what the chances of a negative reaction are likely to be in any given environment.

    • So, you think it’s okay for the Government to knowingly allow an unsafe, and possibly deadly, chemical to be added to our food and beverages? People need to take accountability for the ingredients in the foods they eat?
      I hope you aren’t as big an idiot as this post would infer.
      I would bet that you are ALL FOR Government gun control…

      • Government allows cigarettes and hell, a host of all things that may or may not be bad for an individual. Certain chemicals affect certain people in a particularly BAD way. Bees don’t bother me, but may kill someone who is allergic to them..does not mean we need to kill all the bees. Point is that we live in a free society where you can do whatever you want to yourself. Yes, aspartame may not agree with you, but others it may be ok. REMEMBER, aspartame is a SUGAR substitute and SUGAR is BAD. Not like we did not know that but there are studies that will tell you that SUGAR will kill you, make you fat, add to heart disease, etc. SO, aspartame may actually save some folks by becoming lean. As someone else said here, if your ingesting something, its your responsibility to know what it is and how it may affect you. If not, go see a dietician, a specialist, your family doctor, or GOD FORBID, google it and read pros and cons before you ingest anything that is not natural or organic.

        • debi

          i would be interested to see the evidence correlating ‘diet’ drinks and foods with weight loss. Removing fats from our food and replacing it with sugar or fake sugar substitutes means that the hormonal functions of the body do not have the necessary fats to function, which leads to many diseases. if there is evidence, i will gladly review this. unfortunately it is not only the diet drinks which contain this poison, and it takes an education to learn how to decipher the ingredients on food packaging, not to mention the little loopholes such as ‘natural flavouring’. if aspartame was so innocent why is not marketed as sucralose. and while i am on this rant, why have they combined stevia with aspartame and called it truvia. Stevia is a natural sweetener, plant based sweetener, which helps balance blood glucose levels. if the creation of lean people was the aim, surely this would be more appropriate.

    • John

      Remember, lots and lots of people do not have a computer, nor do they have internet access or watch TV…millions of Americans rely on the government to make the right choices simply because they them self have no way to get informed.

      • And look at the recent controversy around energy drinks… news media actually reported people having heart attacks from drinking just a few of them in a day… They are banned from being sold in parts of the UAE

        When your kids are out with their friends buying something that could give them a heart attack dont you think there is a problem here? Young people arent sitting there researching health info on their computers so we have no choice but to put faith in food companies to not give us products that poison us.

    • Tijana

      GPS Tracker – actually your assumption is incorrect. The dairy industry is lobbying the FDA to allow them to add aspartame to milk without including it on the label (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/26/aspartame-milk_n_2764729.html). If they are successful (which wouldn’t surprise me in the least given the FDA’s corruption and the amount of money big dairy can throw at the issue) then people would be consuming aspartame unknowingly. I’m all for personal responsibility but the FDA is a government agency whose role is supposed to be to keep corporate greed at the expense of the health of the people in check – instead they have become shills for the greediest of the greedy companies. This is beyond personal responsibility, it is corruption at the highest level and control of the food supply by those who would poison the people for a quick buck.

  9. Deb

    GPS…that should also apply to vaccinations as well!

    • Chriggle

      I agree totally, and medications.

  10. DD

    With all the spelling and grammatical errors, this article loses its credibility. Shame.

    • I spotted one possible grammatical error only. And didn’t see any spelling errors. Anyway, in this era only a pedant would be so offended that they would miss what is being said due to a snit over dicey sentence construction. Some authors actually strive to “burn” their sentences like that. As long as one gets the message, who cares? This content is very important and easily transcends any grammarian school marm critique.

  11. The Dean Bean(DD) ;) I don’t see any spelling or grammatical errors, either or it still doesn’t lose it’s credibility.

    • Randy

      You made one of the same mistakes as the author. Possessive of “it” is “its”. “It’s” means “it is”.

      • John

        Who the hell cares?

        • John – You should not end a sentence with a preposition. Also, hell is not descriptive of “who”. Hence, you are fragmenting your sentence with just the first three words and by utilizing “cares” at the end of your statement it makes the reader believe that you are replying “who” “cares” yet have taken the time out to ASK “who cares”? Sounds like you do. Just sayin’.

          • rrr555

            grammar police idiot is you. cannot you get meaning in that you read for the words get in the way.

  12. Chriggle

    What irritates me is that artificial sweeteners are hidden in so many foods and drinks/medicines that you wouldn’t expect to find them in. I read almost every label in the supermarket now, just to be sure.
    I have avoided artificial sweeteners as far as I can for over 3 years now, based on another article I read back then about the neurological effects of sweeteners on the brain in fibromyalgia and myalgic encephomylitis sufferers. I have noticed a great improvement in my conditions (my medical history is complicated) and as such will not knowingly consume artificial sweeteners of any kind if at all possible. Yes, I have to be careful about my eating habits, but I choose high juice squash, water etc rather than diet drinks.

    • Meghan

      Absolutely. When it’s hidden, we can’t knowingly avoid it can we.
      This is why it should be banned and illegal to repackage the stuff under some other name. The name game is how they get away with hiding this and several other evil chemical concoctions they push down our throats. It isn’t right…

  13. I was pregnant when I realized I had a problem with aspertame. I started to lose my equalibrium and I started to fall down. I stopped drinking anything with artificial sweetners and the symptoms went away. This was 28 years ago.
    I started to check into this chemical and I found out that if your baby has an aversion to this chemical the chances of the baby being born with Down Syndrom goes way up. Luckily she did not have that problem. I have to read lables now, it is difficult to find chewing gum, Alka Seltzer, Airborne, or other fizzie concotions without this stuff in it. If by chance I consume it I get whats called a painless maigraine. I feel like I am under water, and my equilabrium is affected.
    I just found out that aspertame is a by product of formeldehyde. Ummm. formeldehyde poop.

  14. Tom

    For some more recent science (2002), try: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230002915424
    This summary of the safety research that has been conducted on aspertame since its approval concludes that the research is extensive, and the additive is no health threat. To quote the summary: “The safety testing of aspartame has gone well beyond that required to evaluate the safety of a food additive. When all the research on aspartame, including evaluations in both the premarketing and postmarketing periods, is examined as a whole, it is clear that aspartame is safe, and there are no unresolved questions regarding its safety under conditions of intended use.”

    • John

      And you believe Monsanto doesn’t pay off those people to publish this? Really? Wow how gullible.

      • Brad

        Oh Jesus, John… You hippies need to lay off the furtive fallacy. No, Monsanto is not paying off our scientific institutions. The logistics of paying off ALL the requisite parties makes it VASTLY cheaper for them to just not use harmful chemicals… which they don’t, because Aspartame has been tested to be safe.

        Seriously, when you accuse thousands of scientists and educators world-wide of simply being bought off by Monsanto, you’re assuming a moral superiority over people you’ve never met, who generally don’t get into such fields to make profits in the first place.

        I have just one question when you make such a claim: how much would it cost for Monsanto to buy your silence? How much money would you require to willfully remain silent while millions are poisoned? If your answer is “no amount in the world”, the same can probably be said about these people as well.

        I mean, seriously “And you believe Monsanto doesn’t pay off those people to publish this?”–what a fucking arrogant statement.

        • sue me

          by the way …. not many people know about this – but there were more Nova Scotians trampled by gay giraffes on Easter Sunday …. than people ever killed by aspartame…..ever

  15. Pingback: The Controversial Story Of How Aspertame Became Legal « The Informist

  16. Scott

    I checked up on this through http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp and am wondering about the turth of this article.

    • Suzanne Camarillo

      From all my research, the negatives of aspartame are enough for me to choose to avoid it completely. I have read that it is the feces of E. coli bacteria produced under lab conditions. That’s more than enough for me.
      http://www.politics.ie/forum/health-social-affairs/123498-aspartame-fecal-matter-ecoli-bacteria.html

    • Enola

      Scott, this is one issue with which I do not trust the opinion of the usually-reputable Snopes. Their basis for the debunking is an email sent to them from somebody who works for the FDA. Of course the FDA is going to defend the product that they chose to make legal for public use. They can’t really be trusted anymore since they are continuously bought out by the companies who want to continue using their potentially harmful products.

      • I agree 100%, Enola..

        • Brad

          Too bad the actual science doesn’t.

      • sue me

        Enola, please give some examples of the companies that continuously buy out the FDA so that they can continue using harmful products. be specific. who is doing it – and why are you not reporting them?

  17. Pingback: RETREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | sondasmcschatter

  18. Dwight

    If Donald Rumsfeld supported it, then it has to alright, right??? :o )

  19. Nathalie

    I’m sorry but I have no link to back up what I’m about to say as it is seond hand information from my boyfriend. However he recently (within the last week) read an article about a study linking depression and other mental health problems with the consumption of artificial sweetners, there was around a 30% higher probability of people who consumed sweetners reporting symptoms of mental health problems than those who didn’t. I expect a quick google would find the article if anyone is interested in finding out more.
    I for one prefer to cook from scratch as far as possible, and mainly drink fruit juice and water, with the occasional squash and fizzy drink and tea as a treat. Everything in moderation, right!

    • Nathalie, the study would have had to have been structured to rule out the possibility that people who choose artificially sweetened products are more likely to have mental instability to begin with. At the very least, many who use them are obsessive about calorie intake, overly concerned with physical appearance, or delusional in thinking that drinking a diet soda cancels out the extra-large order of fries!

    • P.S. – I, too, believe in healthy eating/drinking rather than substituting additives and artificial replacements.

      • Agree, moderation! I drank 3 liters of coke in a 24-hour period once and ended up sick as a dog. My lawyer stated that there should be a disclaimer on the coke liter bottles that states you should not consume that much in 24 hour period. WHAT A SHAM!, he said. After I gave him my money, he said he would push the case forward ASAP. I have not heard from him since. It has left a bad taste in my mouth.

  20. Daniel

    Donald Rumsfeld is NOT our current Secretary of Defense.He resigned over 6 years ago before the Bush administration even finished its second term. He’s done nothing but write books and give endorsements since resigning. Still a good article.

  21. Cath

    When heated, it turns to formaldehyde . That’s why you cannot cook with it. It is poison!

    • aspartame converts to formaldehyde i the body..body temp i high enough 86deg or something,
      to convert it, so if you eat that crap..you may as well be drinking formaldehyde!

  22. Regardless of your political persuasion (I am a Republican…and conservative), Aspartame is POISON and I have NEVER used it and never will. It is a wood alcohol which turns to formaldehyde in the body.

  23. Mae

    Great article. Thank you. I know aspartame is in light yogurts, diet soda, gums, but would love if this article listed more food items to watch for and also other names aspertame might be listed under (in disguise).

  24. Sara

    I’ve never been able to get an answer on how much aspartame is dangerous – often these studdies use huge amounts of chemicals to produce negative affects…larger amounts than anyone could consume. Is anything known on that front?

  25. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | Truth Is Scary

  26. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | The Illuminati

  27. I notice they do not mention hwo the benefits outweigh the risks for some people like diabetics and transplants patients that use aspartame as they cannot use sugar.
    I know of several that have been consuming it daily for nearly 20 yrs. and no side effects.
    The FDA has not approved a ton of things that would benefit people. For instance it took them yrs. to okay EPO for cancer patients, which has saved lives.

    • Melissa

      Perhaps they should look into a natural sweetener, like Stevia. Aspartame is not natural – it is genetically altered. You can consume it for over 20 years & not see any side effects (or you simply don’t recognize that the symptoms you’re having are actually caused by Aspartame – it can mimic so many other health issues). It breaks down into formaldehyde in your body – your body can only process so much formaldehyde at a time – so each time you drink your diet soda you are building up that formaldehyde in your body – which will eventually cause side effects. I drank diet pepsi for over 20 years & scoffed at people that said the sweetener was harmful. I figured it was like an allergic reaction & didn’t realize it built up in your system. Out of the blue I started getting migraines every day (never had one before) – doctors could not figure out why. A couple of years later the seizures started – again, the doctors do not know why. My husband convinced me to give up my diet pepsi for 30 days just to see if it made any difference – I thought it was silly, but was willing to try just about anything. I quit drinking diet pepsi & the seizures stopped!!
      Remember that the FDA also approved saccharine & it was in all diet products for a while before they had to change it because it was causing cancer!

  28. Jess

    You lost me at “health affects.” Shudder.

  29. Sherry

    Very good article! To bad there are so many dolts out there, whose only purpose is to deflect attention from the content. Dummy up and join in the fight against the poisoning of our people and get over silly things as pointing out grammar issues. Who really cares how uptight you are. Ugh!!!

  30. Barbara

    Back in the 90s I started getting severe asthma attacks…and couldn’t figure out why. Then my boss noticed they got really bad every time i drank a diet soda…three guesses, yes it was aspartame, or nutrasweet as they call it. I did a lot of research at that time online and there was no information at all. I wrote all manufacturers that had products I liked that had it and said I can not eat your product because I am allergic and no one ever cared or responded. I read labels religiously now.

  31. jay

    Tons of proof they want to kill us and what do we do? Vote for them, good job sheep.

  32. I am one of many people who have had extreme negative reactions to this artificial sweetener.As a borderline diabetic I used to drink only diet sodas and sweetened products.After one particular day of ingesting to many sodas I found myself unable to think clearly ,had a horrible headache and difficulty speaking…I thought I might be having a stroke.I wasn’t it ended up being the diet products.I quit using all of the ones I knew about.Aspartame is most certainly a poison.Today I drink water mostly but if I feel like a sweet drink is what I want I have a regular soda ,with my doctors permission. I am amazed at how many things contain this and other artificial sweeteners .As far as the remark that was posted earlier about taking responsibility for ourselves and not blaming others …I feel that it is unfortunate we cannot trust agencies such as the FDA that are supposed to be making sure what we have available is safe.The dollar in the end is far to often the decision maker. A ban on aspartame should still be in effect.

  33. as long as the message gets across does the grammar really matter

  34. Enlightened Soul

    I suppose the other 90+ countries that approved it were all in the pockets of the secret conspiracy too, along with the National Cancer Institute and many other organizations that have studied the hell out of aspartame and found no links to anything dangerous unless you have phenylketonuria.

  35. Jeff

    It’s hard to take this too seriously, when its main source is a propaganda site. Are we buying into the anti-vaxxer hype, too? (Don’t even start. There’s no legitimate scientific evidence linking vaccines to autism. Just fearmongering and bad logic.)

    • Peace

      You and Unenlightened Soul up there oh let us not forget the grammar police up there too are the only 3 of 20 comments apposing, yeah you’re full of logic, you’re full of sh-t more like it. There are strait-up facts in this article you just blatantly sweep under the rug cus of what? Cus you said, who said? Oh it was you, you who? Exactly a Nobody said “there is no legitimate scientific evidence”.

  36. Pingback: Home Consciousness Health Science & Tech Alternative News Blog Multimedia CE Radio The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | Other News of Interest

  37. Carla Stroh

    If you have a reaction to something, you don’t need a scientific study to tell you there is a problem.

  38. wastedwrath

    This is an absolutely terrible article. You have three sources, one from a doctor who sells her Aspartame Detox program to people. Another from a site that is covered in ad space, tips on how to survive the coming collapse of society and sells negative polarity sleeping pads (read: power balance) and another that’s very similar to this site in terms of unproven nonsense…

  39. Unbelievable how products like this (and Aspartame certainly isn’t the only one) are legally used, and in massive quantities, expect when you take the finances into consideration. It’s a MASSIVE industry. On the one hand you have the FDA describing it as “one of the most thoroughly tested and studied food additives the agency has ever approved” and its safety as “clear cut” and on the other you have evidence from multiple sources linking it to all sorts of health problems.

    I certainly avoid it when I can (I never buy “diet” dinks, or cheap ice cream etc. but it’s not always avoidable because it’s in so much, and some of the alternatives aren’t much better anyway.

  40. ThisGuy

    This is so thoroughly debunked it made it on snopes.com and also wikipedia. The fearmongering over aspartame has come and gone countless times, but in a pop culture with such a short memory, it is constantly recycled, i mean it creates intriguing articles doesn’t it? But oh well who am I even talking to? I mean this site if filled with conspiracies to the brim, I feel like I’ve just walked into a church and said god isn’t real…

    • John

      Well, god certainly is not real, but the side effects of aspartame are ……

    • Yeah, Snopes and Wikipedia–where the truth gets assassinated daily. — the Postman (http://islandearth.strangled.net)

  41. Andy

    The Aspartame conspiracy has been doing the rounds for years, just do a little research, it took me minutes to find multiple credible sources, backed up with evidence proving Aspartame is safe. The only ‘evidence’ this article gives is more conspiracy articles and sites which are making money from the fear of Aspartame.

    • David Grotjohann

      Yeah right , Put an conspiricy on it and dont think. A fact is simple “how was it aproved by FDA”? by corruption. And i hope you learned in school that against facts they are no arguments. Thanks

  42. Note: Tonic from sainsbury’s they have their own with no aspartame in FYI

  43. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | skjaldmarr's valley

  44. One of the most toxic substances you can ‘legally’ put into your body. I personally will buy nothing that has this vile chemical in it

  45. marco

    Claro nadie te impone a consumir aspartame. Pero de ahi a que con el tiempo te quieran obligar a consumirlo hay un paso

  46. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal « THE INTERNET POST

  47. i do not like david for his “reptiles” but i love this article!!!
    gona share!

  48. Piles of comprehensive studies have been completed that show aspartame is a cause for over 90 serious health problems
    Jct: And yet, the hidden powers keep poisoning the population! Just like fluoride, mercury, everyone is bewailing how we’re being poisoned and yet no one seems able to stop it! Har har har. That’s because people can’t believe the owners want their debt slaves to sickly to have time to think of resistance. Straignt from the slave-owners manual, keep them drunk, broke, sick and in trouble.

  49. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal w/timeline « Stuff Ain't Right

  50. Pingback: Quiklinx for the week of 2/4 (see Quicklinx Page above for previous) «

  51. Pingback: One Very Easy Persuasion Technique | Poch Peralta

  52. Pingback: Collective-Evolution – The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | the Mahoney

  53. Be careful what you give your kids….Aspartame is the main Sweetner in FLINSTONES Kids Vitamins….Check out My line of Childrens Vitamins and supplements All natural and all Veggie Based. http://vita-shop.myshopify.com/collections/childrens-health

  54. David Beaumont

    It’s quite a coincidence that all the diseases listed as being caused by Aspartame happen to be the very diseases that are most mysterious–that is they all have long long histories (longer than the existance of Aspartame) of no one knowing for sure what causes them. I know you think you know what causes cancer but really in most cases of most cancers there isn’t one particular cause that can be blamed. Leukemia, headaches, seizures, and epilepsy have been around a long time and are famously of murky origin. And Fibromyalgia is newer than Aspartame but that is the most mysterious disease ever. So much so that some people dispute that it’s even a particular thing.

    If that isn’t enough, the list of “connections” between the companies and the officials in government only gives one side. I don’t know any of the connections but I find it hard to believe that the people in the FDA that voted against Apartame are uncorruptable pillars of honesty. For all I know they are hooked up with the Saccarhine people. Or Big Sugar. Who knows? The article doesn’t mention anything about it. What is being left out of this story?

    This article has done nothing but make me realize that there is nothing to worry about with regard to Aspartame. Thank goodness.

  55. Pingback: Gates of Vienna News Feed 2/9/2013 | Gates of Vienna

  56. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal « STARVEBITCHITSHOLLYWOOD

  57. Rene

    Good article thanks for the info. Why is it that whenever I read a story about bad food decisions Monsanto is always the name that is associated with it. Would it not be prudent to perhaps really look into this company and what impact they have had as a whole on the health of people who use there products ? Dead people do not continue to be customers. After all a company that makes Round-up and Agent Orange really does not inspire me to want to eat anything ever again.

  58. Pingback: Zoetstof en aspartaam!!! | AnGeLWinGsAnGeLWinGs

  59. FDA approval suggests something is safe? Are you on crack cocaine or what?

  60. Dr. Russell L. Blaylock — Excitotoxins [MSG, Aspartame]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEh3_JBDErw

  61. Pingback: Aspartame, A Short History | Know Your Enemy

  62. Anarcho-Capitalist

    FDA = eugenics.

  63. Look are you people stupid ? Anything that has Monsanto on it is highly questionable they are by far the most evil corporation ever. Then include Donald Rumsfeld and Saint Ronny Raygun and you have appetite for death and destruction. Plus it was banned by the most corrupt regulatory group in the history of mankind. You idiots that pick out grammar errors to forsake the info are just that IQ of 20. Wake up you morons a box of hair has more brains.

  64. Ed

    Interesting article but dreadfully written. It reads like a high schoolers essay.
    If you are going to write about science then at least mention some of the relevant studies.

    I agree with the content, but the presentation just makes it feel like a conspiracy theory rather than a fact.

  65. Pingback: How Aspertame Became Legal | A Sheep No More

  66. P. Hall

    The time for being naive is gone. There is 1 simple thread that holds all of the parts together & provides an explanation. The U.N. is being run by the most tyrannical of the tyrants. And what is the dream of ALL TYRANTS? Absolute control over the populace. Food & drugs provide them the perfect tool by using the distorted propaganda of SAFETY. Their unending cry is SAFETY, SAFETY & MORE SAFETY in these areas. They have created a façades of disastrous proportions in order to gain strongholds on the people to further their unyielding and unending dream of controlling the masses to steal their wealth for themselves. In other words, U.N. directives are trumping the United States Constitutional law by bending it towards their sick desires of being despots. And our elected officials refuse to help us. In fact they further the goal of the destruction of our guaranteed freedoms.

  67. It is’t we the peope any more. It’s now theGoverment telling the people what they should do and not do.. One life is not worth lossing to any of theses drugs. I was told by Doctors I had to loss weight and to start drinking Diet pop instead of regular pop. I was useing sweet in low for years a long with the Diet Pop and all other Diet Products. Yes I lost 187 pounds, but now I’m suffering from Fibromyalgia. I trusted my Doctor and the Product’s to help keep me healthy, I’ve under gone Cancer Surgry in July and I now no longer drink or eat diet any thing! I thought I was doing the SAFE way of getting healthy. When your Doctor tells you your doing everything right and how glad they are that your doing such a wonderful job. What else is one to do. We trust our doctors right! That’s way we go to them for the help!!! I didn’t know I was walking to a “DEATH TRAP” With a life long health proplems and so much surrering. To learn that it could of been taken care of years ago just added to the suffering. SHAME SHAME SHAME. I pray they do something to stop this as our furture childeren are at risk. I wouldn’t want one of my grandchilderen to suffer as I am now. PLEASE PLEASE STOP THIS MADNESS NOW!!!!!!

  68. Pierre Paul

    The sugar industry and its role in attempting to halt the production of aspartame is never mentioned in this article.

  69. Zen

    Dr. Russel Blaylock has a detox from Excitotoxins. Eliminate Aspartame/MSG and “Natural flavors” from diet wwwdorway.com http://www.CARightToKnow.org Eat alkaline, organic food and drink alkaline/Spring water.

  70. Cathy Schenk

    A very enlightening book to read is called “The Slow Poisoning of America” …. table of contents: Fluoride,food additives,MSG,Aspartame,Stevia,Melatonin…etc. Betcha can’t put this book down! by Paladins Press http://www.spofamerica.com

  71. Cathy Schenk

    The Slow Poisoning of America By John E. Erb and T. Michelle Erb

  72. cindy

    Seriously? People would rather have a political debate and criticize grammar than take in the facts? I think exposing political associations was an integral part of educating people as to intent regarding the public’s health. If it exposed your favourite politician as a bankster out for monetary gain facilitating big pharmaceutical profits despite the health risks involved, that is YOUR disappointment. It doesn’t change the fact that aspartame is poison.

  73. cindy

    Simple. IF IT WAS NOT FOOD 100 YEARS AGO, IT IS NOT FOOD NOW. Nothing made in a lab is fit for human consumption. Lab created ‘food’ will only cause illness leading to lab created pharmaceutical drugs as their recommended treatment. It’s a cycle for profit and people are afraid and bewildered that governments would allow such poisoning of society. The FDA is for hire and their ‘approval’ means nothing sadly. I’m pretty sure every member of the FDA has HUGE investments in pharmaceutical drugs in the stock market. Look at the fortune they would lose in revenue if they put out a cure for the common cold. Wait until they win the right to not label GMO foods. The illnesses caused by that will bring in rediculous profit for the shareholders of big pharma drug companies. Anyone who doesn’t see these terrifying facts is fooling themselves. Fear of the truth kills.

  74. C Gal

    PLEASE GOOGLE “SWEET POISON” IT IS THE REAL STORY, AND ALL OF THE DISEASES AND DISORDERS AFFILIATED WITH IT S CONSUMPTION.

  75. Pingback: Collective-Evolution – The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | Logan's Week

  76. Pingback: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | Naturally Nourishing

  77. Jason

    This article is completely made up. The FDA has never banned aspartame. I have seen the peer reviewed article in a journal directly from the FDA stating they studied it 3 times to put this rumour to rest. It is completely safe.

    • Collective Evolution

      I would check into sources and the true story before making claims like this. It’s a well known fact that Aspartame has been banned a few times and that peer reviewed studies were mainly conducted by benefiting companies. In studies by un bias companies, damaging side effects were found in each.

  78. Theresa

    I used to get the full blown EPILEPSY the kind that usually made me faint to start with, and the convuisions with all the symptoms continued without anything or anyone being able to stop it; the one is called: “THE GRAND MAL” If the convulsions starts this has to be allowed to continue as long as someone gets to be present and aids the person by holding his/her head and waits for convulsions to slows down and eventually stops. While being at home or even attending school I was not allowed to be alone because of the fear of the convulsions along with the fainting it was considered fatal because when the convulsions started I got to be unconscious and shaking or convulsions continued then falling to the floor was next and always I coincided being too close to a wall or furniture, I ended up hiiting my head and in instant, lying on the floor my entire body and head hitting the floor again it is considered a triple blow combined with the convulsions. And no one is allowed to wake up the person at the moments the convulsions are running, the symptom has to follow its course until the tremble inside the brain stops then recovery moment is not instant either it has to take its course too until the person gets to wake up and there are additional symptoms that has to be watched for because person feels like getting high fever even thought there might not be any; person has an urgency in going to the bathroom because all abdominal muscles gets relaxed and loose; person will end up feeling very tired and sleepy so the person has to be allowed to sleep, the person might sleep for few minutes or even or at least a long hour . Now the many symptoms I get I can not control because there is not a cure; my hands my body, the entire spinal cord, the base of my neck, back of my head., along with legs, feet, arms, I always get a constant uncontrolable narrow tremble that feels like if some one is shaking or pulling the string of a guitar . I never knew why did I got the EPILEPSY or what produced. Now, the Epilepsy is under control; but I have to face the fact that I will never recover because there is not cure, I do get the seizures once in a while even taking a medicin prescribed by a neurologist. Very often I do get constant remainders of the convulsions because is now, daily that my body trembles badly; Now I do not need anyone to watch over me, it used to be my mother because she was the first person who saw me getting the convulsions everyday, sometimes two or three convulsions per day and for four years continously; my school years were interrupted for days because my parents always had a fear what else could happen when I attended school. When the convulsions started I was 12 years old when this ended up being under better control I was about 17 years old; now I am in my 50′s and I will never going to see a cure. Since long time ago when I started taking the medicine that controls my seizures, I need to swallow the prescription with food; and the amount I need to take is either twice a day or even three times a day depending on the symptoms; because I need to take a portion in the morning and another portion in the evening. I got accostumed to swallow the prescription while I eat my breakfast and my meals. if I do get to drink milk while eating my breakfast then I do perform well my tasks at home or my job. Now I found that Federal Drug Administration FDA is considering mixing “??? ASPARTME WITH MILK ???” which it is considered FATAL AND THE CONGRESS IS CONSIDERING Its APPROVAL OF THIS MIXTURE ” which is considered the biggest mistake the F.D.A. Has ever done. i will ended getting the full blown EPILEPSY all over again “THE GRAND MAL” if F.D.A. Food Drug Administration approves this mixture is like drinking lead and I will never be able to drink milk ever again. The legacy of the F.D.A. will never be the same is like mixing fire with fire which it will be fatal for innocent people, I happened to be doing the search on line and I google: “famous antique milk glass bottles that were used long time ago to transport milk before using the now plastic containers.” What i encountered with this information that someone else knew of the erroneus, ugliest, decision of the F.D.A. Is planning to approve which is mixing ASPARTME with MILK, I just can not perceive the idea whose twisted mind ever has to think of this crime, I consider this crime and that person or group must be dissmissed inmediatelly without pay. ASPARTAME iis a poison if it is OK for the person or group of people to drink such a poison they drink it in their own milk and do not make every one else suffer because of your erroneous ideas. I SUFFER FROM SEIZURES AT THIS PRESENT MOMENT AND I HAVE BEEN SUFFERING FOR MANY YEARS YEARS AND YOU “Federal Drug Administrtion and the GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF TAKING CARE OF MORE IMPORTANT DETAILS HAPPENING AROUND THE COUNTRY OR AROUND YOUR CORNER YOU THE F.D.A. ALREADY PLANNING TO POISON INNOCENT PEOPLE ALL BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU INVENTED SOMETHING THAT YOU THINK IS GOING TO BE FENEFICIAL FOR EVERYONE? YOU SHOULD BE FEEL ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES ONE SINGLE PERSON THAT WILL END UP SUUFERING BECAUSE OF YOUR OBNOXIOUS IDEAS,

  79. Pingback: Article: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal | CLIPPINGS

  80. Pingback: RLM News Show Blog - 2013-03-14 | Real Liberty Media

  81. Derek

    Conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy … there is sooo much mis-inforamtion going around it’s not funny. Virtually everyone commenting here is biased … information that suits your point of view is much more easily believed, information that doesn’t support your point of view is instantly dismissed for one reason or another … it’s rediculous …

    All you need is the slightest bit of common sense …

    “IF IT WAS NOT FOOD 100 YEARS AGO, IT IS NOT FOOD NOW”
    Yeah, and 100 years ago the average life expectancy was 30 years LESS than today … so are we really killing ourselves these days?

    “Yes I lost 187 pounds, but now I’m suffering from Fibromyalgia. I trusted my Doctor and the Product’s to help keep me healthy …”
    Go back to being 187 pounds heavier and come back and tell us how “healthy” your are and how many conditions you “won’t” be suffering from … simply put your life has been saved, be thankful!

    To all those suffer some disease or another, I truly do feel for you and I am glad you have found something that helps alleviate your condition or symptoms … unfortunately you represent such a small proportion of the sufferes of these and many other conditions that what you do to help yourself probably won’t help others … for every person who gets headaches or migraines from these sweetners there is probably 1,000 or 10,000 or more who don’t … I’m sorry, it’s fact, or simply put, everyone else would not be taking them, people would have worked out themselves (like all of you did, unless you are all super-intelligient or something) that this “chemical” does not work for them.

    Simply, we are living longer than we ever have. If you really want to make changes, then look to things like smoking and obesity these are the real killers in America …

    • Melissa

      It sounds to me like you are the one that needs to educate yourself. Don’t believe what anyone says in the comments – actually do some research for yourself! That’s what I did & was shocked by what I found.
      I was momentarily impressed that you said people just need to use common sense and “if it wasn’t food 100 years ago, it’s not food now”. No truer statement could be made. But then you blew it by implying that genetically altered food is good to go – after all, we’re living longer now, right?
      The reason life expectancy has improved is due to advancements in medicine… The BIGGEST reason people live longer now is the “invention” of running water. That did more to lower the death rate than any other medical invention ever.
      More people have issues caused by aspartame poisoning than you can possibly comprehend. There are even more people that have health issues that they don’t even realize is caused by aspartame! (it can mimic diabetes, MS, etc, etc, etc). Not long ago the FDA said they receive more complaints about aspartame than any other product! So to say that these people are in the minority is another uneducated comment.
      But it’s all a big conspiracy theory, right? The government/FDA would never do something that would be detrimental to the health of the citizens of the US, right? Remember Saccharin? It was FDA approved & was in nearly all sugar-free products – until it got pulled because it causes cancer. Do you see all those commercials on TV saying if you or a loved one took a particular medication & suffered life-threatening side effects that you may be entitled to compensation? Guess what – all of those drugs were FDA approved too.

  82. Larry Robichaud

    Sugar is real from nature, learn and teach about it’s use in moderation and don’t use products or support companies that use to much sugar, or any chemicals that are dangerous.Come on people we all know what is good for us and what isn’t, pick the fruits of the living bush , use the products that Nature gives us.grow what you can where you can, smarten up and help to save our world from the greed machine.

  83. Derek, I don’t think you can see past your own face…They want you that way… Looks like you’ve had enough fluoride to remain a sheep… Well done, you’re a mushroom…

  84. I myself have almost died from this evil chemical, but to the ones who don’t care about this poison & use it are most likely using drugs & other offensive things to their well being. I do everything possible & only go to a Homeopathic Dr. Splenda I might add is also evil. It starts off with onions & potato sugars but then infuse it with massive amounts of chlorine & flouride which give it the sweet taste. If people would only research what they put in their bodies. Yellow dye #5 & #6 comes from gasoline. UGH, why bother nobody cares right?

  85. Jamal

    How small minded do you have to be to get hung up on the grammar of this article?

  86. Nate

    I think you’re all a bunch of idiots! We live to die. Have fun while doing it!

  87. Melissa

    Aspartame is genetically altered – nothing natural about it. You can consume it for over 20 years & not see any side effects (or you simply don’t recognize that the symptoms you’re having are actually caused by Aspartame – it can mimic so many other health issues). It breaks down into formaldehyde in your body – your body can only process so much formaldehyde at a time – so each time you drink your diet soda you are building up that formaldehyde in your body – which will eventually cause side effects. I drank diet pepsi for over 20 years & scoffed at people that said the sweetener was harmful. I figured it was like an allergic reaction & didn’t realize it was cumulative. Out of the blue I started getting migraines every day (never had one before) – doctors could not figure out why. A couple of years later the seizures started – again, the doctors do not know why. My husband convinced me to give up my diet pepsi for 30 days just to see if it made any difference – I thought it was silly, but was willing to try just about anything. I quit drinking diet pepsi & the seizures stopped!!

    Remember that the FDA also approved saccharine & it was in all diet products for a while before they had to change it because it was causing cancer!

    • I almost died from this poison 2 yrs. ago. As our bodies change so does the way our body reactions to foods that never bothered us before. It took 10 days for it to get out of my system. I thought I was going to die. Our government doesn’t care about us at all. It keeps alot of different companies in business. I am not proud to live in the US anymore. I think I’ll move out of this God forsaken country.

  88. I have been using about 8 Sweet’nLow packets in coffee and cereal every day for about 20 years and never had a problem or developed any medical problems. Maybe I am just one of the lucky ones.

  89. mmmisha
  90. Deedee

    Err…where on earth did you get this info? I see your ‘credible’ sources are other blogs, not actual research. I’m not for aspartame and there’s a lot of research out there to cause enough doubt about whether it’s safe, but putting biased, and quite possibly made-up, info like this out there hurts the argument. It’s the reason why people side with the FDA – a lot of other people just look like hippie doomsday-sayers.

  91. Pingback: The Things They Put in Our Food - K. L. Neidecker: The Blaagh

  92. Pingback: Drinking to death? | Bees are not our slaves

  93. Pingback: You can clean your teeth…. | weaselbabble

Leave a Reply

CE Magazine

Subscribe to CE Magazine Monthly For Exclusive Content!

Watch SIRIUS!

Yekra Player

Yekra is a revolutionary new distribution network for feature films.

Sirius

“Sirius” is a feature length documentary that follows Dr. Steven Greer – an Emergency Medicine doctor turned UFO/ New Energy researcher – as he struggles to disclose top secret information about classified energy & propulsion techniques. Along the way, Dr. Greer investigates new technology and sheds light on criminal suppression. He accumulates over 100 Government, Military, and Intelligence Community witnesses who testify on record about their first-hand experiences with UFOs and with the cover-up.

In the course of his research Dr. Greer is asked to look at an amazing find: a humanoid specimen, 6 inches long from the Atacama Desert. Not until 2012 was he given permission to take bone samples and DNA from the specimen. At that same time a pre-eminent geneticist, hearing of this find, offered to do DNA testing. He enlisted an MD from the same university,- world renowned for his work with skeletal anomalies, to view the x-rays and CT scans. Their expertise along with Dr. Greer’s expansive knowledge of the subject bring more questions than answers. Where did this “Atacama Humanoid” come from? Are there others like it? What does it say about the origin of the human species?

While on this odyssey, the audience gains a whole new perspective on technology, human evolution, and clandestine organizations who have manipulated and controlled the public for centuries.

Watch Our Documentaries!

The Collective Evolution The Collective Evolution II

CE Radio

Listen to internet radio with CE Radio on Blog Talk Radio

We Recommend

www.truththeory.com www.consciouslifenews.com
  Love us on Facebook to keep up-to-date with our latest insights, content, and quotes. Join the discussion and share your thoughts with our like-minded community! Click here to subscribe to the CE Magazine for exclusive content! CE Mag is digital so it's eco-friendly.