Note: Nothing is more important to us than presenting this story accurately, if you have information that can accurately answer these questions and clear things up, please send us info right away as we would be happy to set this story straight once and for all.
Since the very first day of the Sandy Hook shooting there have been a lot of questions that were left unanswered by the mainstream media and since then, more and more in-congruencies are raised with still no official answer. One thing we can be certain of before getting into this article is that the official story is not factual. That being said, another key thing that must become clear before continuing, this is not an attempt to explain what happened nor be inconsiderate to any of the alleged victims etc. Please do not bother commenting that this is insensitive if you have not asked these questions for yourself. The whole purpose of this article is to share the facts surrounding this event and how the official story is not true. We are being deceived to a degree and we simply need to ask why.
Again I feel the need to reiterate as I am sure this will raise a lot of reaction from people reading this immediately, be sure to think about this stuff without emotions taking over and running away with the idea that we are not allowed to question anything the media tells us. This very idea comes from the media themselves who spend hours on air telling you that anyone who questions anything are crazy, conspiracy theorists, wack jobs, pyschos, don’t make any sense, are insulting the families, etc. This is a very obvious ploy to make anyone who questions anything seem like they are incorrect. Meanwhile, the story being told by the media themselves is at best very flawed.
“Not asking questions is the ultimate insult to the victims.”
If you are unaware of the Sandy Hook shooting that took place on December 14th 2012, the official story is such: On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot twenty children and six adult staff members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in the village of Sandy Hook in Newtown, Connecticut. Before driving to the school, Lanza had shot and killed his mother, Nancy, at their Newtown home. As first responders arrived, he committed suicide by shooting himself in the head.
The Key Points
The media claims that 3 hand guns and a rifle were used in the shooting. It was stated on several occasions by the medical examiner involved that the rifle was the main weapon used and he drew these conclusions based on his examination of the shot wounds of the victims. The issue here is, the cops retrieved the long rifle from the trunk of the car after all the shooting was done by Adam. According to the official story, Adam killed himself in the school and never came out. How is it possible to find the rifle locked in the trunk if it was the weapon used inside?
Source: See video clip at bottom for live video of police finding rifle in trunk. You also here reporters attempt to debunk the medical examiner during questions in which he dodges the question.
The media claims there was only 1 shooter, Adam Lanza, but if you look closely at all the details revealed by the media, we see that there was actually a 2nd and possibly third shooter. Children told the media that the cops had arrested someone on the ground in front of the school. And video, as well as audio, shows the police chasing down a man wearing cammo pants into the nearby forest where they apprehended him. We have to ask why these questions are not being explored and answered? These are big inconsistencies and they have to be taken seriously and looked at.
Source: See video clip at the bottom. It outlines all of the video evidence involved.
The media and investigators initially claimed the mother was a kindergarten teacher. As you examine the facts, you find out the mother was not a kindergarten teacher or a teacher at all. This means there is no real link between Adam Lanza and that school as claimed by the media. The media story was, he drove to his mothers school, killed her, then shot the 20 victims. Then it was, he drove to the home, shot the mother, then went to the school. What is interesting is that the media claimed it received the information about the mother being a teacher from the school nurse. As people began looking into the school nurse, they discovered the nurse the media claims told them the story, doesn’t even exist in records or work at the school.
Source: See the video clip at the bottom. Outlines all details including database of nurses.
Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker who was allegedly shot, there is a video of him prior to the interview he does with the media where he is seen laughing and having a great time right before the interview. Literally seconds before he goes on air, he gets in character and begins hyperventilating to bring on his sadness. He even asks as he is moving up to the mic, as if it’s a real set, “Are we ready to start?” While some suggest that everyone deals with death differently and Robbie may be dealing with it in his own way, why would he purposely change character and appear extremely sad just in time for the interview? Why not stay “normal?”
Source: See the video clip at the bottom. Real media clip is shown.
Another note on the Robbie Parker story is the fact that the Parker family had created a Facebook donation page the morning of the shooting before anything had happened. They speak of the loss of their daughter and then hours later talk about how the school is in lockdown and they don’t know if Emilie is safe or not.
Source: See video clip for details. Screen shots of the FB page are shown as well as the creation date and the claims made by the family about their daughter with the time stamp.
The McDonald family is another family that allegedly lost a 7 year old child that day. In a CNN interview not long after the shooting, they are seen in character with very jovial and up beat attitudes that very likely would not reflect that they had just lost a child. While we can’t ever suggest how someone should or shouldn’t act, you be the judge, does this resonate with you as being two people who have just lost their child? Once again, in this case we realize this cannot be a factual point, however it is important to note.
Source: See videoclip at the bottom for CNN interview.
One of the most interesting pieces that cannot be denied is that fact that not only was the Facebook page commemorating Victoria Soto’s death created 4 days before the shooting, but so was the website the page was promoting to help fund victims. The Sandy Hook victims fund website was also created 3 days before the shooting happened.
Source: See videoclip at the bottom as it outlines all of the details regarding the time stamps and page creations.
The Arlington Devils website released the “How to talk to your kids about the Sandy Hook shooting” manual 4 days before the shooting happened. After word of this got out they later changed the date on the article but still did it wrong and changed it from Dec 10th to Dec 13th, which is still 1 day prior to the shooting. This type of manual would likely be something that comes out weeks after the shooting, not before or right after.
There are numerous other pages, websites, funding campaigns and donation pages set up for the Sandy Hook victims that are all dated BEFORE the actual event occurred.
Source: See second video clip at the bottom for details on this.
The media aired video of the Sandy Hook school and shooting but used video that was not of Sandy Hook School.We also have to question the fact that there is not a single picture or video clip of students being evacuated, being outside the school or anything. Is this truly possible when there would be media everywhere and these days virtually everyone has access to cameras on their phone. No children, and not even any ambulances or emergency crew there at the scene to help anyone out. Just cops and pedestrians.
Source: See all media footage including videoclip below labelled part 2. All is explained.
I am going to stop here as I believe this is enough to make a solid point. There are literally hundreds of videos, key facts,and articles out there that describe what’s going on here. Upon first hearing about this shooting, within hours I began noticing first hand that the media had their stories crossed and there was a great deal of inconsistencies. That is before I even began looking at the “crazy conspiracies” as the media calls them, that exist all over the place. Yes, it does not feel good to have to realize this whole thing contains many many lies but these questions have to be asked and we need to be mature about it. It does us no good to simply lash out and go wild denying this stuff yet believe what is obviously not truth coming from the media, government and the president.
Some may ask, who is to benefit? Why would they pull something like this off? What seems to be the biggest reason is gun control. Right now in the US there has been a lot of focus put on removing guns from the public in order to keep them from being able to defend themselves. While I don’t feel anyone should have guns, including police and military. I feel this is obviously what is happening here as anytime you create a lot of emotional noise around an issue and repeat it over and over again it becomes clear that you can justify something to the public very easily so long as the previous actions have taken place to warrant decisions. We saw this with 9/11 when the PATRIOT act was put in place which essentially removed most rights citizens have. Not to mention the PATRIOT act was written before 9/11 occurred, this should raise a big question right away.
All in all I want to say that for those who did have victims, we feel for you and this type of thing is never easy. But questions do need to be asked and we need to begin questioning why this is all happening and why we choose to turn a blind eye all of the time.
Note on the sources: If you choose to debunk them prior to watching them because they are “YouTube” videos, then that is your discretion. But these videos contain nothing but REAL video, audio and images surrounding the event.