Depression is one of the most commonly diagnosed “mood and psychiatric” disorders. A large portion of humanity has been convinced that depression is a disorder that’s out of ones control, you can read more about that here. More than 120 million people on the planet are said to suffer from depression. The medical research that gives way to the assumptions, definitions and characteristics of this “disorder” is funded by the same pharmaceutical companies that generate billions of dollars from it. Fortunately, more mainstream science and the professionals within it are slowly waking up and questioning the information they are required to believe.
It’s quite shocking that pregnant women are sometimes encouraged to take vaccines and prescription drugs. New scientific studies show that antidepressant drugs used during pregnancy is causing babies to be born with physical defects, some are not born at all. Senior doctors suggest that study after study indicated that the most commonly used anti-depressant medication, also known as seratonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), causes pregnancy complications like premature birth and pre-eclampsia.
Published in the journal Human Reproduction, by obstetrician and chairman of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at MetroWest Medical Centre, Dr Adam Urato and Dr. Alice Domar, a psychologist and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School; the study shows an exponential increase in rates of birth defects in children who are exposed to antidepressant drugs while in the womb. This goes along with the skyrocketing miscarriage risks as well.
The situation amounts to a large scale human experiment. Drug firms were overstating the benefits and underplaying the risks for the sake of profit. Family doctors were failing to grasp the true dangers and tell pregnant patients of them. – Dr. Adam Urato
Over 40 studies have shown a link between antidepressants and pregnancy dangers. Included in those risks is pre-eclampsia, a type of pregnancy related to high blood pressure that can lead to serious complications like live, stroke and stillbirth issues.
Emerging research is also suggesting that antidepressants can double the rate of autism in children and increase the risk of lung and bowel diseases. Pharmaceutical companies have no reason to display the risks and mainstream media does not touch upon them. Do you think it’s a coincidence that the mainstream media networks are also controlled and owned by the same group of people and corporations that control the pharmaceutical/medical industry?
It stands to reason to me that the drug makers would rather that the risks of these agents in pregnancy not receive widespread attention as that would be a reason for many women to not take the drugs in the first place or to stop taking them – both of which are not good for sales of the product – Dr Alice Domar, psychologist and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School
In Britain alone, it is estimated that 20,000 pregnant women take SSRIs every year. A spokesman for the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) said that treatment decisions were for doctors to take up in discussion with their patients. But how true is this? If the medical research that the doctors study is funded by the pharmaceutical companies that make the product, isn’t there a possibility for false information? A conflict of interest? Or at least information emphasis of potential benefits rather than potential dangers?
Below you can see a CNN video presenting this information in a very bias manner. They suggest that taking antidepressants during pregnancy is a viable option and should be carefully considered as one. They also mention a few potential dangers, but they are very clever in their power of persuasion. Anybody can watch this and easily feel safe and justified in administering or taking this medication during pregnancy. That’s how easy the mainstream media can distort our consciousness and persuade our truths.
Time Warner owns CNN and Time Warners CEO Jeff Bewkes is a member of the Rockefellers Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)(3). Frances D Fergusson is on the board of directors for Pfizer, who often comes together with Time Warner to promote similar ideologies. Frances D Ferguson has been the director at major energy corporations, like Central Hudson Gas and Energy Corp, and is heavily involved with the Ford foundation. The Ford foundation is heavily linked to clean energy suppression. Ferguson has also been the director of major banking institutions like HSBC(2)(4). Pfizer’s recent CEO Jeffrey B Kindler is also a member of the CFR and has recently been appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Directors in New York City(1). There are hundreds of connections that all seem very questionable and it’s clear that the same group of individuals all operate the major industries that surround human beings. These industries are becoming more transparent by the day. I could make thousands of connections that should make one scratch their head, but it would take a lot of time. I encourage you to do your own research. If you simply look at the board of directors, CEO’s and other individuals put in place of major multinational energy, pharmaceutical, education, and food corporations, you will see they are all members of the same groups that are headed by a few families that hide behind them.
Having trouble losing excess weight? This could be one of the biggest reasons why.
We know so much about food now yet much of the population is overweight and unhealthy because of the quality of our food and our perception about food.
Luckily there's a quiz that you can take to find out where you stand on food addiction. You can take it here.
After you will get results and specific information based on your score. Try the quiz!