14 Year Old Responds To Billionaire Who Claims Monsanto Is A Hero



reachel parentKevin O’leary was recently challenged by a 14 year old GMO activist, Rachel Parent. She is the founder of gmo-news.com. She would like an opportunity to speak with him on the CBC show “The Lang and O’leary Exchange,” but I doubt she will get it.

It’s a show watched by many in Canada, placing a person of high wealth and influence in a position to speak and easily influence the minds of many without any evidence. It’s simple, someone with a voice on a major mainstream media network (who has a main anchor as a bilderberg attendee) simply speaks, and is believed by those who watch. Meanwhile, the observers never do their own research, if they did they would turn off their television right away. They call it television programming for a reason. One can easily get caught up in the program, and actually believe this subject is up for debate simply because somebody on their television is engaging the subject in a debate-like manner (monkey see monkey do). If one would really like information on GMOs, all they have to do is research it and make further connections that will provide a very large wake up call.

Putting our source of information in the hands of media corporations owned by a small group of multinational corporations (who are owned by major financial institutions) isn’t too smart, is it? Shouldn’t we be questioning what we are told instad of blindly believing things on a daily basis while unaware of the evidence that challenges their claims?

Young children all over the world should be a lesson for the older generations. As we move forward, the generations coming in are wired differently, they are able to see through the veil with ease and have a burning desire to change the planet. I think we should help them, encourage them, and let them light the way on the road to planetary change instead of forcing them into a system that does not resonate with them.

For more information about GMOs, visit Rachel’s website. That’s gmo-news.com. She is 14 year’s old and easily takes down Kevin O’leary. Collective Evolution has also covered  GMOs and Monsanto in depth. Browse through our website or use our search bar with key words like “GMO” and “Monsanto” for more information. All articles are sourced, so feel free to take a look!

Monsanto Should be held up as a hero because they’ve developed technologies that help under developed countries increase productivity by 5 and 10 times. You’re an ignorant and stupid  person if you say what Monsanto does is bad for human beings – Kevin O’leary

Here is a link to Mr. O’leary’s rant:

http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/TV+Shows/Lang+%26+O%27Leary+Exchange/ID/2387888169/

More From 'Multimedia'

CE provides a space for free thinkers to explore and discuss new, alternative information and ideas. The goal? Question everything, think differently, spread love and live a joy filled life.

89 comments on “14 Year Old Responds To Billionaire Who Claims Monsanto Is A Hero

  1. joe

    Every single person citing a source website is linking to obviously biased material… way to get your point across…..not

    • When it comes to the future of our planet and our collective and environmental health, everyone is biased. E.v.e.r.y.o.n.e.. If they don’t have a personal opinion, they’re either dead or they’ve been asleep for several decades…

  2. puke

    It does not matter what you pro gmo zombies say. You are defending a lost cause nobody belives your lies http://www.activistpost.com/2014/05/genetic-engineers-agree-gmos-neither.html

  3. Sol

    Dear Priest Nicolai and likes, I suggest you all join in a beta test – as the GMO exposed team members together with all GMO producing and financing corporate members(they should be aytomatically included)-you guys on a probono basis.Me and all others on the placebo sample.This is a good idea to be adopted as National legislation worldwide.Then after lets say 30 years-a generation- or earlier need the results point to any health risks appearing amongst you,we may compare longevity etc and make a decision on GMOs as part of the general trend existing now of testing everything first among the general population for free ,while corporate members enjoy their organic only meals from a distance

  4. Maria

    Look, I am just asking for labels so I have the option of protecting my daughter. She has an intolerance to GMO Soy. I thought originally it was to all Soy products, then one day she accidently drank GMO free soy milk from Costco and was completely fine. Since then a battle for me to sort through it all and make sure she doesn’t get sick. Personally, I can’t stand GMO products. When you have a child that can’t tolerate it, you will understand.

  5. s

    Yeah I’m sure this random 14 year old understands what GMOs are and how they work. I don’t think anyone who criticizes GMOs could even tell you what they are, let alone be in a position to tell you that they are dangerous.

    • Napercussion

      The fact is that she HAS done the research and DOES know what she is talking about. The people who make negative comments about her assertions are the ones who are not in a position to criticize her. If they had done the same amount of research she has done they would not be discounting her position.

      • Searching Google and reading Naturalnews is not research. This girl repeats long debunked “facts” and only has a voice because she’s a gimmick. What 14 year old can really assess the content of a scientific study? What 14 year old understands the different between transgenics and chemical mutagenesis? What 14 year old even knows what the word “fascist” means? Certainly not this one. She really is not in a position of authority on the matter. She’s simply parroting the nonsense anti-science philosophy of the big Organic lobby. She’s being used, and doesn’t even know it.

        • steph

          are you for GMOs?? Maybe some research is in order!!

          • Yes, I am for GMOs because the scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the fact that they are safe to eat. I’ve probably done far more research than you have, I’m sure.

        • What anti-GMOer knows how to read a scientific study regardless of age?
          Just a bunch of dumbasses parroting garbage.

        • Agust

          There is already a thorough research out there wich Seralini did and it is the only study that is reliable. gmo kills you from the inside out it´s a fact i wouldn feed my pet with it. Plus there are hundreds of scientist outraged by the retraction of it for corporate interest but thats just another day at the office for you killers of the earth and humanity. These frankenstein crops are not better than wich nature grows. http://sustainablepulse.com/2014/03/04/150-global-scientists-condemn-retraction-seralini-gmo-study/+

        • Not every kid in america is dumb haha and a lot of 14 yr old kids know what fascism is from reading brave new world or 1984. ‘the big organic lobby’ hahaaha oh no! not organic food! What is anti-science about asking Obama to keep and act upon his 2007 promise to label GM foods? Fck Monsanto, how can you state you’re mission is to feed the world and yet sell terminator seeds that don’t yield any new seeds so the farmer has to buy more? If you want to feed the world make seeds that yield 3x the seeds not no seeds

      • Chris

        I have done the research, I know and work in the field…I’m sure this girl knows a lot about advanced genetics and chemistry

        • It's what you don't feel

          Do you have to wear protective gear when you work in the field, Chris? And this Priest obviously didn’t research shit because if he did, he wouldn’t be so willing to support something that has PROVEN TO CAUSE HARM IN ORGAN TISSUE!

          • Chris

            No I do not, when they spray we don’t go in…normally the chemical evaporate in hrs, at most a day. Did you know that organic farmers use more chemicals that have been proven to cause more health issues??

          • It's what you don't feel

            The chemical may evaporate but there is still a layer of the pesticide covering the entire crop. The fact that no one can go in there should be a sign that mass farming is a terrible idea. And don’t tell me what’s good about organic farming as I’ve worked on organic farms of all fruits and vegetables for all my life and we never had to spray a ton of pesticides. One of the conditions necessary to label your food organic is by not using pesticides. We use natural substances made from root extracts to ward off pests. If everyone just grew a garden, none of this need to halt world hunger would exist. How about we teach people how to take care of themselves instead of how to get a mindless job to pay someone else to possibly take care of them?

          • That is not proven. Do some ACTUAL research from a site that doesn’t have advertisements for bug-out kits and articles about aliens controlling the world.

    • Obviously you didn’t take the time to follow your own advice and research who she is and what’s she done before making your comment. The reason this guy most likely won’t debate her is because the last Monsanto advocate that did got his @$$ handed to him on TV and she was 12. The videos are all over youTube. Now go educate yourself and quit trying to belittle the efforts of someone who is trying to make a positive change in the world.

      • That video was full of her spouting “facts” that have long been debunked. Many were debunked before she even before she appeared on that show. Thousands of scientific studies say she’s wrong in believing GMOs to be harmful. And dozens of international health and science organizations agree that there is no harm or need to label GM products. Being anti-GM is as dumb as being a climate change denier.

        • dinobb

          We don’t want GMO. And we will eat what we want to eat. At least for this simple reason, label GMO now.

        • Miss Jones

          What about all the countries that banned monsanto? Why would they do that if it wasn’t harmful?

      • It's what you don't feel

        Thank you!

        • It's what you don't feel

          Thank you Marty Bowman, not the person who’s job it is to brainwash people.

    • a

      she explained it clearly int he video….anyone who criticizes the girl should probably watch the video first.

  6. The Billionaire should stop eating, if that’s his answer..oh, before he goes he should leave me a few hundred million.

  7. Pingback: Health Freedom Alliance » Monsanto Buys Weather Climate Corporation For 1 Billion

  8. John

    What I’d ask O’Leary is if he chooses to eat GMO’s I’m sure that would tell you a lot about what he secretly thinks about them he could be an avid supporter like he claims but chances are he knows better then to eat it so he is just a hypocrite.

  9. Michael

    Kevin O’Leary is an ignorant and Stupid man. I don’t care how rich someone is that does not necessarily make you smarter. I used to watch Dragon’s Den all the time and I just cannot watch it anymore as this asinine person is on this show. The way he treat’s people is disgusting. I would love for him to wake up tomorrow and be broke. Hey Kevin, watch a little interview with David Suzuki on the network that you are also on. He can explain it to you in quite shocking details the effect’s of Genetic Modification. If your not a scientist, you should keep your mouth shut tight!

  10. Well, actually…

    … Kevin O’leary IS right about one thing he said: GMO crop “has helped under-developed countries increase productivity by 5 and 10 times.”

    That’s true, about the “productivity part.”

    What he FAILED to mention, though, and following through with, is: Many of these GMO “beneficiaries” later get very sick, develop all kinds of diseases, metabolic dysfunctions, and malnourishment disorders … and then, in turn … help make a lot of money for starch-agriculture’s REAL beneficiaries: Big Pharma.

    Yep. That’s “productivity”, alright. The ‘Big Food’ keeps the masses alive long enough, so that they can then be handed off to ‘Big Pharma’, to patch them up, and then hand them back off to ‘Big Food’ for yet another round.

    Which also highlights let ANOTHER myth: That humans are living “healthier” lives, today, based on “evidence of living longer.”

    However, you can be MEDICALLY-INDUCED to live longer … but that doesn’t mean that the final 8 to 12 years of your life is QUALITY life. That doesn’t mean that “just getting by” is the same as really living vibrantly, productively, and independently.

    If you are a miserable, sickly, bed-ridden person … then “living a long life” in that state doesn’t prove that you are a healthy (or happy) specimen. It just means that you are being medically-induced and FORCED to stay alive longer. But what does that truly amount to, if your medically-prolonged life-span is an undignified, unfulfilling and depressing existence?

    Hence, this is how the ‘Big Food’ and ‘Big Pharma’ industries work, back to back. They scratch each other’s backs, by playing “hot potato” with the population. First, the ‘Big Food’ industry contributes to feeding into a disease-stricken nation (by growing cheaply-produced, low-perishability, low-quality foods as “staple.”). Then, the sickly person is in turn passed on to ‘Big Pharma’, to put a temporary “band-aid” on the ailing person, so that they can be pressed back into the consumer cycle for yet another round of a life-style of poor-quality food.

    Then, they get sicker, still, and once again … get passed back to ‘Big Pharma’ for another temporary “patch.” And back and forth, on and on, the wheel spins. It’s the “cash cow” merry-go-round, if you will. Both of these mafias (“Big Food’ and ‘Big Pharma’) have one primary goal: To squeeze as much disposable income out of the individual as possible, by keeping them alive longer, only so that they stay diseased longer, and dependent on them longer.

    Round and round, the human “cash cow” goes. Where it finally drops (dead), no one knows. (But, let us all gloss over falsified and duplicitous medical “statistics” which “prove” that “humans are living longer lives than ever.” Sure they are, but in the form of sickly, lethargic, drugged-up and numbed-down, zombie cash cows).

    “Beneficiaries”, these large companies are, Kevin O’leary? Sure, they are. They try to squeeze out as much from their human “cash cows” as possible, for as LONG as possible, so that it benefits their maximum profit. That’s truly “productivity.” Just not in the interest of the citizen, at large.

    • It's what you don't feel

      I wish I could like your comment.

      • Mike W.

        I had to copy and paste it to my FB acct so I can refer back to it at any time.

    • Christian

      Many countries have banned and continue to ban for scientific reason, genetically modified organism due to their environmental harm and human health issues. I’m replying because they do not actually make a country more productive food-wise. The energy inputs are higher than organic (pesticides, machine use, etc.) – the trick is that they are bigger and more colorful and so therefore ‘look’ like they are better. They are actually less nutritious and people have claimed they can taste the difference.
      This is all aside from the oppressive nature of patenting life forms.

  11. Pingback: Monsanto Drops Bid To Approve GMO Crops In Europe | Collective-Evolution

  12. Sarrah

    O’leary must own large shares in GMO ! He wasn’t even paying attention to what she was saying! Only thing I wish she would had said about feeding the starving is ” does giving the starving a full belly out way the magnitude of health issues they will face and can’t afford to get medical help? So they die from horrible illnesses????

    • Chris

      What in the world would anyone care about the opinion of a 14 year old girl?? I am sure her educational background of science fair projects, and the science club has made her an expert on the subject, but I find this absolutely ridiculous. I applaud you Monsanto for ignoring this childish attempt to attack your image. The anti-GMO movement has really stooped to a new low with this one. With all the credible evidence there is out there for the benefits of GMO’s this is what makes headlines….I myself am disgusted over this, and view it as just another scare tactic and disinformation propaganda to keep people from knowing the true facts about GMO’s and the benefits they can have for the world and mankind.

      • It's what you don't feel

        Chris, There are NO benefits to GMO, not even nutritiously. Also, if they succeeded in putting a halt to world hunger, then why are there so many homeless and starving still? The evidence against GMO’s is much more plentiful then the lack of evidence that supports GMO. I hope your bowels rot out the same as mine have been. Apparently, food is supposed to make your anus leak blood and mucous and the age of 23. USE COMMON SENSE, idiot. Introducing foreign bacteria and chemicals into the system WILL alter your genetics and in turn, cause many disorders.

        • Chris

          Really and your health issues have been undeniably linked to GMO’s? Or is this just something you believe is the cause for your sickness? Because if they had been undeniably linked to your sickness I’m sure I would have heard about it, along with the rest of the world. There has not been one study that hasn’t be debunked or countered that prove GMO’s are harmful. What has been proven (by numerous studies and by numorious agencies) is that GMO’s are perfectly fine. The organic lobbiest would love for you to believe differently though, as they would like to see their profits continually rise for their “specialty” foods. What they do not want you to know is most of the herbicides/pesticides/insecticides that they use are harmful, and that actually process of “organic farming” is more harmful to the land. Also giving it a shorter quality producing period.

          • It's what you don't feel

            Considering the fact that I ate organic all the way up until my college years, and am only now experiencing any medical conditions related to both my digestive and reproductive systems (the same organ systems that have been SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN to be most affected by GMO’s) then yes I would definitely link it to the shit I’ve been eating. If GMO’s weren’t so bad then why are they banned in more countries than not? Why have the countries that have banned GMO’s seen a significant decrease in health issues? Why is Monsanto so reluctant to label their science experiments when organic products are labeled allover? How is it that I know people who have reversed their cancer and gastrointestinal diseases just by changing their diet, no chemo? You talk about “organic lobbyist” even though Monsanto lobbyists are the ones that dictate most congressional decisions regarding both food and pharmaceuticals. You probably read experiments put out by Monsanto’s scientists. Your ignorance is sickening. It’s people like you that prevent the majority from moving forward. Monsanto is trying to control the food supply as seen by the continuous attempts to prevent home gardening, lack of GMO labeling, and forcing contracted farmers to continue to buy new seeds every year. (this is because the plants reproductive systems are destroyed so the plants cannot be reproduced.) It is proven that BT crops produce poison within their cells and GMO pollen changes the DNA of all other plants surrounding the crops. You talk about all of this debunking but I can’t seem to find a credible source that debunks anything about GMO’s. Seriously, where do you get your information from, Fox news?

Leave a Reply