Water Powered Car – It Doesn’t Matter If It’s From Your Tap, Bottled or Lake


advertisement - learn more

UPDATED NEWS: Saltwater Powered Car Was Just Approved In Europe

Everyday the world becomes aware of technologies that have the potential to halt the unnecessary damage we continue to create using fossil fuels. We’ve been talking about it for years, transitioning our way of  life to be more harmonious with the planet and its natural systems. I’m not talking about solar or wind power (although great), I’m talking about clean and green technology that  render fossil fuel burning technologies inferior and obsolete.

One of these “new” technologies is a water fuelled car, and it has been unveiled on a number of occasions. It’s an automobile that derives its energy directly from water, and water alone. It is not hard to see why it’s not available to the masses. An engine powered by water would wipe out a large chunk of the fossil fuel industry and change the way these companies do business all together. The oil and gas corporations combine to bring in trillions of dollars every year. Inventions like these are a direct threat to the industry.

JAPANESE COMPANY UNVEILS WATER POWERED CAR

A Japanese company called Genepax unveiled their water powered car in 2008 in Osaka, Japan(1). It doesn’t matter if it’s tap, bottled, or lake water, any type of water can make this car run. An energy generator splits the water molecules to produce hydrogen and this is used to power the car. They use a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) to split the Hydrogen from the Oxygen through a chemical reaction. The cell needs only water and air, eliminating the need for a hydrogen reformer and high pressure hydrogen tank.

This isn’t a conspiracy! The reality of this device has been verified by patent offices all over the world. To search a Japanese patent, you have to go through the Industrial Property Digital Library (IPDL). This organization makes patents available to the intellectual property department of the Japan Patent Office. The IDPL provides over 60 million documents and their relevant information as published since the end of the 19th century. The fact that these are even published for patent pending says a lot.

Click HERE to view the water energy system patent. You can also visit  the Industrial Property Digital Library itself, do a “PAJ” search. Type in the publication number **2006-244714**. Documents are also on file with the European Patent Office, you can view them HERE. Reuters also did a brief report on the vehicle as you can see in the video below.

So what happened to Genepax? Approximately a year after revealing their device, the company shut down. They stopped displaying their device as well as promoting it. The only explanation given was a lack of monetary funds.

STANLEY MEYER’S WATER FUEL CELL

Genepax isn’t the only group to have come forward demonstrating that we can turn water into hydrogen fuel and use it to power cars. Stanely Allen Meyer is another one who invented a water powered car and it received very little attention when it came to making the news available to the masses. Today, it’s a fairly well known story due to the mass awareness that has been created around the story. Stan’s invention was picked up very briefly by a local news station in Ohio. You can view his patent HERE, it also describes the whole process. You can view the entire collective of his documents here

Here is another brief clip of Stan as he demonstrates his technology. Water contains a lot of hydrogen, as we know, which is a very efficient type of fuel. Converting water into hydrogen is 100 percent clean!

So what happened to Stanley Meyer? He was sued by potential investors, it was determined that his device was nothing revolutionary and simply uses the process of electrolyses. His claims were determined fraudulent, and  his technology was under investigation by a number of investors, the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Defense. It was patent pending, all of a sudden Stan Meyer died suddenly in 1998 after dining at a restaurant. Many close to him, including his twin brother, believe Stan was intentionally poisoned. Stan claimed,, just before he died in  he restaurant parking lot, that he was poisoned.

USING WATER AS FUEL

Water makes the perfect fuel source. It’s comprised of two hydrogen atoms and one atom of oxygen. When the water molecule is separated into its two component atoms and oxidized as fuel, the result is equivalent to an energy output that is two and one half times more powerful than gasoline. The byproduct of the combustion is water vapour, totally pollution free, returning water back into the atmosphere. The process used is known as electrolysis, which is a method of separating elements by pushing an electric current through a compound. Various techniques for water splitting have been issued in water splitting patents all over the world. You can click here to look at a few from the United States.

Not to long ago, researchers at Virginia Tech extracted hydrogen energy from water. They discovered that the energy stored in xylose splits water molecules as-well, yielding high purity hydrogen. You can read more about that here. There are multiple examples of creating hydrogen by splitting the water molecule (2).

Another existing technology that can replace that entire industry is the Free Energy Device. Implementation of these two technologies alone would create one of the biggest technological changes in human history. The same group of people that own the big oil companies also own the mainstream media, so it’s not surprising that we don’t hear about these technologies. Scientists have been murdered, labs have been burnt down, and prototypes have been taken.

Alternative technologies are great, and obviously have tremendous implications. We must remember that the human race cannot create from the same level of consciousness that created this system in the first place. A change for planet Earth coincides with the change of heart more people are experiencing everyday. The key to move forward and enter into a new paradigm is simple, it’s love. With love, we’d already have these technologies implemented Because of greed, hate, fear and ego, they remain suppressed, but only for now.

Hopefully this article inspires more to further their research on water powered cars. There are multiple stories with very similar endings for the parties who came forward with this ground breaking technology. Why do we continue to speak about change when we already have the technologies to implement change? One reason is because a large majority of people have yet to become aware of these alternative technologies. They are not marketed, publicized or given much attention. It can be hard to accept that there are people on the planet actually engaged in the suppression of such information, but unfortunately it’s a reality. We are living in the age of transparency, many of us are waking up to thoughts and ideas we never thought we would ponder. In some cases revealing these technologies can cost you your life, that’s how much opposition exists against it -for now. When a new technology becomes so evidently clear,  the implications are far reaching and can threaten multiple corporate interests.

Sources

(1)http://www.reuters.com/video/2008/06/13/water-fuel-car-unveiled-in-japan?videoId=84561

http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=JP&NR=2006244714&KC=&FT=E

http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/cgi-bin/PA1DETAIL

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130403104104.htm

(2)http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&p=1&f=S&l=50&Query=ttl%2F%22water+splitting%22%0D%0A&d=PTXT

http://www.waterfuelcell.org


Take The 30 Days of YOU Challenge!

Take the free 30 Days of You Challenge and discover more about your heart, mind and soul.

There are powerful benefits associated with taking time to relax, meditate, do something you love, journal, reflect or get started on a new hobby, but that means dedicating YOU time for it.

This challenge will help you set out on a journey to getting powerful habits started that can transform your life.

Join the free challenge and get the full guidelines on how to do it as well as support throughout the challenge.

Click Here!

advertisement - learn more

More From 'Energy'

CE provides a space for free thinkers to explore and discuss new, alternative information and ideas. The goal? Question everything, think differently, spread love and live a joy filled life.

  1. H8

    How much can we hate those kind of corporations and government, who kill, shut down projects and rule from the point of greed.

    Reply
    • We should not hate them at all. We should show them the compassion every human being deserves; without workers a corporation is just an idea – it requires minds to live inside, and grow with. If we help revert those individuals to love, the world will change quicker and better than if we keep hating our enemies.

      These are the teachings of Jesus, over two-thousand years ago. Peace, justice, and love are not of this world; and won’t be for some time – but they will endure and grow within the lives and hearts of the followers of God, Peace, and Love.

      Reply
  2. otisbright

    my question is what does it do to the water? we are already facing water shortages, if we start burning it as fuel, what will we have to drink? there is a finite supply of water on earth, and if you can’t drink it after it is used for fuel (water becomes not water, used up) what good is the technology? if it doesn’t interrupt the water cycle not bad, but if it removes water from the cycle, very, very bad. can’t imagine it being water if it removes hydrogen from it in the process of it being used as fuel.

    Reply
    • Jeff

      Water is being added to the system all the time in the form of ice from space. Also, no combustion system is perfect, so any unburned hydrogen will rebond with unburned oxygen, resulting in water vapor.

      Reply
    • that was my questions as well. Aquifers are drying up right and left, here in Co water is going to subdivisions rather than Farmers. In Japan it will be run by radiation!

      Reply
    • You do realize 75% of this earth is water right? What shortages are you speaking of….LOL

      Reply
      • Joshua Ricci

        Only 20% of it is drinkable the rest is salt water

        Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      This is a great question. Basically water that is used for fuel can be water that is dirty or not clean. The process of electrolyses actually cleans the water as it is split into hydrogen. Out of the tail pipe would be a few drops of water and steam or condensation. Essentially, using water as fuel never destroys the existence of any water. It just returns it back to the water cycle and in a cleaner form. For example, if you had a very dirty lake, you could use that water to power cars and in turn you would be cleaning up the lake as the water being returned back would be cleaner through the natural cycle water goes through.

      • ThereWillBeATest

        I asked this question in another part of this comment section, but I think it would be more appropriate to ask it here.

        Since the car runs on water, and the exhaust is also water, why do you need to refill the car? Couldn’t you just condense the steam exhaust back into the fuel tank?

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          Great point. Some designs do include grabbing some of the condensation and re-adding it back into the device. I have not seen one in person that does this, but I know people have theoretically spoke about it for sure.

      • Zane

        What happens if you use ocean water? During the process where does the salt go? Is it essential that the water be desalinated before using because of salt contamination in cities? From what I understood the byproduct evaporates but I didn’t think salt evaporated.

        Reply
  3. welly

    Entirely agree with the enormous benefits of clean fuel and the deviousness of big bussines, the tragedy of pollution, climate change etc. Do not understand how a water powered energy source is possible, converting water into hydrogen and oxygen must require the same amount of energy as that created when re-combining the 2 elements. This is afundamental law of nature. Anyone understand how energy is apparently being created?

    Reply
    • ThereWillBeATest

      Energy can not be created nor destroyed, only moved or changed into different forms. In this case, the car is powered by an unspecified “energy generator” that cracks hydrogen from the water to run a fuel cell. Personally, I’m wondering what the purpose the fuel cell is used for. Couldn’t that “energy generator” be used to power the car directly and cut out middleman?

      Reply
  4. Arjun, class job on putting everything together, this is exactly what’s needed to be able to convince people of the truth, and start questioning.
    Would love to be part of this collective evolution site, if you have room for another person, please drop me a message and i can show you what i’ve been up to on the reporting side of things.
    Thanks in advance and keep up the inspiring work your doing

    Reply
  5. Robert Cheetham

    What do you use to split water into hydrogen and oxygen? This requires energy, where does the energy come from?

    Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      From the devices I have been researching and seeing first hand, most people are able to do it using the car battery as they are able to generate enough power that. In some other cases I have seen people put a secondary battery in the trunk. If you are able to push the molecules to a higher frequency before splitting, less power is required. This requires an electronic device though.

      • What happens when the battery runs out? You stop producing hydrogen? We already know you can’t burn hydrogen to produce enough energy to use to split enough water to replace the hydrogen you’ve burned.

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          From what I have seen, the battery regens on the alternator.

          • ThereWillBeATest

            If the battery is recharged by the alternator, why do you need to fill the car up with water? Couldn’t you just re-use the water from the exhaust?

            Reply
  6. Miguel LL

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVhXrvCCILw

    there is also a filipino who made one himself

    Reply
  7. John

    “An energy generator splits the water molecules to produce hydrogen and this is used to power the car.” Did you fail to see this – an electrical system needed to split water into Hydrogen/Oxygen needs more power than you would get burning the hydrogen. This is a fairy tale.

    Reply
    • Lynette

      John….”an electrical system needed to split water into Hydrogen/Oxygen needs more power than you would get burning the hydrogen” ……please post your proof and sources for this statement you made. I’m sure others besides me would love to read them. Sounds like smoke blown out your arse to me.

      Reply
      • “please post your proof and sources for this statement you made”:

        These should be enough to get you started. There are more if you need them.

        Ball, Philip (September 14, 2007). “Burning water and other myths”, . Nature News. doi:10.1038/news070910-13

        Schadewald, Robert J. (2008). Worlds of Their Own – A Brief History of Misguided Id
        eas: Creationism, Flat-Earthism, Energy Scams, and the Velikovsky Affair. Xlibris. ISBN 978-1-4363-0435-1.

        Edwards, Tony (December 1, 1996). “End of road for car that ran on Water” The Sunday Times (Times Newspapers Limited). p. Features 12. Retrieved May 16, 2007.

        “The Truth About Water-Powered Cars: Mechanic’s Diary”Popular Mechanics. July 3, 2008. Retrieved July 21, 2008.

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          lol. Of course these technologies have been subject to misinformation! But when you have nasa astronauts, professors, research and actual devices in the public domain….it’s easy to see how real it is 😉

    • GBD

      You realize a car battery is required for a gasoline combustion engine too right? Or is that a fairy tale as well? Once fired an alternator restores power to the battery.

      Reply
      • And actually a battery is not required for a gasoline combustion engine. Check out most lawn mowers, or gas powered weed whackers.

        Reply
      • Do you think you can hook up a battery to an alternator (assuming the proper circuitry) and expect it to run forever?

        An alternator uses more mechanical energy than it produces in electrical energy. That’s why you don’t see cars driving around with just a battery/alternator circuit, and it’s also why you can’t run a car on just water alone.

        Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      That’s not true, people are getting these results off the same power used to power a car stereo… I’ve sat with these people. I watched their devices work. I’ve asked them many questions. I can promise you this is much more real than people like to think. It’s very basic science.

      • Really, do you think that if we could make a device that produces more energy that it consumes using water only that nobody would be building it? In any country on the planet? Or is it more likely that this company was one of many that promised more than it could deliver and this fellow died like many others in a public place.

        Reply
        • DylanJB

          Why is it so difficult for you to believe that the heads of the global corporations who are making obscene amounts of money with the ‘business as usual’ scenario wouldn’t do absolutely anything to make sure no threats to their position see the light of day?

          Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          Considering I know someone currently driving a car completely powered by water. Considering I have visited several people working with the technology, I strongly believe we are not given this information and technology on a large scale due to what it would mean to the businesses that this invention would destroy.It’s child’s play technology. Go to the toy store, look for a car that runs on water. You will find mini models where children can build a model car and run it off water. People have upscaled this and it works.

          • Dan G

            Why don’t you research Genepax. They were shut down four years ago. This is an unresearched article.

            Reply
            • - Collective Evolution

              The article states that they were shut down. The article explores why they were shut down a bit. They are not the first revolutionary energy company to be shut down regardless of having working products.

          • If I said to you that I knew people who drove cars that sucked in Carbon monoxide and produced gasoline, would you have to meet them to know I was mistaken, or been had? No you wouldn’t, because such a thing is physically impossible. The car that runs on water is also physically impossible for exactly the same reasons. It simply doesn’t exist. If someone has managed to convince you that this impossible device exists, then you’ve been had. It’s just that simple.

            Cars that run only on water cannot exist, it’s just that simple.

            Reply
          • I’m sorry Joe, but there’s no such thing as a car completely powered by water. If you really believe you know someone driving such a vehicle, I hate to say it, but you’ve been had.

            Reply
            • - Collective Evolution

              Yes it exists lol I promise you. How could you say I’ve been had when I know the people and you do not? Thats kind of absurd.

  8. Unfortunately this is not real. It’s nothing more than another “Free Energy” investment scam. Genepax shut down because they had nothing.

    Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      It’s not a new idea. This has been done for a long time, the proof is in the article, you can even view the patents. Genepax isn’t the only example, there are multiple examples. If you examine all of the evidence, for and against, it’s hard to see how this isn’t real.

      • If I said to you that I knew people who drove cars that sucked in Carbon monoxide and produced gasoline, would you have to meet them to know I was mistaken, or been had? No you wouldn’t, because such a thing is physically impossible. The car that runs on water is also physically impossible for exactly the same reasons. It simply doesn’t exist. If someone has managed to convince you that this impossible device exists, then you’ve been had. It’s just that simple.

        Cars that run only on water cannot exist, it’s just that simple.

        Reply
      • Zane

        Some people can’t believe, they’re hardwired for survival.
        I however witnessed one of these vehicles on the news when I was younger. I also remember the oil companies bought the patent for it for a very expensive price. Does anyone else remember that? It seems like I can’t find anyone who does and I have a hard time finding the story.

        Reply
        • It’s not a question of believing, it’s a question of physics. You can’t get more energy out than you put in. That’s why none of these “free energy” machines ever work, they contradict the fundamental laws of the universe.

          And I’m very sorry but the idea that the oil companies suppress these is just not in the realm of reality. Oil companies are run by rich men who want to be richer. The oil companies right now are in a stalemate with each other where there’s nothing that would let one of them rise over the other. If this technology were actually feasible, the person who owned it would immediately become the richest person in the history of the world, and able to knock the competition out of the game and literally own the world.. If it existed, the oil companies wouldn’t be hiding it, they’d be killing each other to buy it, own it, and use it to make more money.

          Reply
          • - Collective Evolution

            many new technologies work against our laws of physics, I think it’s safe to say that the human race has more learning to do! These free energy generators have been proven in hundreds of laboratories across the world…

            Of course suppressing information is in the realm of reality, especially oil companies.

          • DylanJB

            So when the oil companies get rich by owning and selling the fuel, please explain how they maintain that kind of monopoly and level of wealth creation when they no longer own the fuel? It’s not as if they’re going to own the water, so how?

            Reply
      • It’s not physically possible. It takes energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. If you burn the same hydrogen and oxygen you get less energy back, because some of that energy gets stored in the chemical bonds. Even if you could get 100% efficiency, which you can’t, it still won’t work. If it was physically possible, then the reaction would be spontaneous, and water wouldn’t be able to exist. It’s that energy barrier that allows water to exist, that precludes this from working.

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          I’m not sure about that daniel, water molecules have been split before. There are sources for that in the article as well as at the bottom of it…..It’s clear that it is physically possible, its been done for years.

  9. welly

    Ok, now waded through the patent literature. Basically, this IS a clean means to power a car. However, the energy required to produce hydrogen is more than the energy obtained when re-combining hydrogen with oxygen to power the car -because the conversion process is less than 100% efficient. That is why this idea has not been commercialised. Hydrogen fuel cells are pretty good but still require extra energy from somewhere to split the water molecules. Shame :(

    Reply
    • Spectre

      You do not recombine the hydrogen and oxygen to power the car. The hydrogen burns along with some of the oxygen and the bi product is water. The energy to run the separator comes from the cars alternator. The military are using units like these in several of their vehicles.

      Reply
      • welly

        Water is 2 molecules of hydrogen + 1 of oxygen. To split water into ihydrogen and oxygen requires the same amount of power as that produced by hydrogen reacting (burning) with oxygen to also produce water. So, no net energy is generated. Now, if you have a battery to allow electrolysis to produce hydrogen to power the car, then the motive power is actually coming frm the battery which has to be recharged by some other power source. The car alternator helps conserve energy by regenerative brakin.
        The fact is that energy cannot be created or destryed, fundamental law of nature.

        Reply
      • If you burn hydrogen that you have obtained from splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, you are combining oxygen and hydrogen to produce water… that is exactly recombining. The alternator needs energy to produce electricity. If you’re burning hydrogen to run an engine to turn an alternator to split water to produce hydrogen, you’re still going to end up with an energy deficit, because the energy you produce burning the hydrogen is always going to be less than the energy needed to produce it, and that’s even assuming 100% efficiency and Zero friction, which can’t be done. That’s physics.

        And no, I’m sorry but the military are not using this in any of their vehicles.

        Reply
  10. Hey-zeus

    I am by no means an expert on this subject but I’m skeptical that this technology is as developed as you present it as. I read (what appears to be) a fairly academic article on the subject that seemed to indicate that we are not nearly as far along with this technology as you seem to think.

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/electrol.html

    Reply
    • Lynette

      Gee……maybe it’s because people are murdered before they can get any further along with their technology…….or maybe just downright concerned about GETTING murdered. Ever considered that? Maybe they’re just a little concered about their family’s safety, too. But that couldn’t possibly be the case, because we know the big corps and our government would NEVER threaten our imtimidate us, right???????

      Reply
      • Why would a big corporation murder anyone when the smart thing for them to do would be to buy it and put all the competition out of business, and rule the world? Sorry but the oil company hides it conspiracy idea just doesn’t hold water.

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          This can be the challenge in realize the true nature of these techs. Anytime we are unable to connect the dots or willing to see the truth about the suppression of technology, it is almost certain we cannot be open to alternate possibilities not currently in the mainstream.

  11. waltinseattle

    The catalysis must consume a sufficiently lower energy amount than can be captured. Atalysis means that this is true, except for the “sufficiently” part. It must be PRACTICAL. Then there are the unmentioned storage issues which bring the cost of hydrogen fuel up to the impractical point.

    Reply
    • Vlad rhe impaler

      That was considered years ago, safe storage for H2. One of the methods solving this was adsorption onto various substrates like zirconium as I recall.

      Reply
    • Mike in AL

      Gotta change your thinking, man :) A) If the Hydrogen can be produced on demand, no need for pressurized storage ( I don’t know about the specs for this car, though); B) If you’re stuck with Maxwell’s or Faraday’s equations, you’re on the wrong path because their mathematics were incorrect, for the same reasons the Einstein’s famous equation is incorrect.

      Reply
  12. Lynette

    ” If we help revert those individuals to love, the world will change quicker and better than if we keep hating our enemies.” “Peace, justice, and love are not of this world; and won’t be for some time “……Now I’m REALLY confused…which is it???

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Collective Evolution welcomes differing viewpoints and thought-provoking opinions that add value to the discussion, but comments may be moderated to remove profanity or remarks that detract from a healthy conversation. For the best interest of the community, please refrain from posting vulgar comments, profanity, or personal attacks. Comments submitted may automatically be flagged for review by our moderation team before appearing on the website.

Featured TEDx Talk

TEDx - Agents of Change

Free Exclusive Film Screening!

Free Film Screening
advertisement - learn more

CETV - What's On

Published: May 7, 2015

Subscribe:
Connect, Inspire, Chat & Share!
CE Radio - Listen now!
advertisement - learn more
Amazers
Subscribe to CE Magazine Monthly For Exclusive Content!
The Mind Unleashed

We Recommend

www.truththeory.com

Trending Now

rat

What Would A Rat Do: Rescue And Save Another Or Go For The Food?

Researchers at the Kwansei Gakuin University in Japan found that when rats were put in a situation where they could drown they will, indeed, rescue their distressed pals from danger—even when they’re offered chocolate instead.