Scientific Evidence Suggests The Vaccine-Autism Link Can No Longer Be Ignored


advertisement - learn more

Vaccine-childConcerns regarding vaccinations continue to increase exponentially in light of all of the information and documentation that has surfaced over the past few years. As a result, corporate media has responded to alternative media, stating that the increase of persons who are choosing to opt out of vaccines and the recommended vaccine schedule is a result of ‘fear mongering.’ This may not be too surprising as the corporate media is owned by the major vaccine manufacturers, and the major vaccine manufacturers are owned by corporate media(1)(2)(3)(4). Given this fact, it’s easy to fathom the possibility that these institutions are desperately trying to protect the reputation of their product.

For example, if we take a look at GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer, they are owned by the same financial institutions and groups that own Time Warner (CNN, HBO etc.) and General Electric (NBC, Comcast, Universal Pictures etc.).(1)(2)(3)(4) This is seen throughout all of the major vaccine manufacturers and all of the 6 corporations that control our mainstream media. Keep in mind that these are the major funders of all ‘medical research’ that’s used to administer drugs and vaccinations. Despite these connections, medical research and documentation exists to show that vaccines might indeed be a cause for concern.

Vaccines and Autism, Both Sides of The Coin

Here we will simply present information from both sides of the coin because many are not even aware that two sides exist. We’ve presented multiple studies, citing multiple research papers and published research conducted by doctors and Universities from all across the world.  Here is an example of a paper that describes how vaccine manufactures and medical ‘experts’ with drug industry connections have been aware of the multiple dangers associated with vaccinations for over 30 years. We’d also like to present medical research that indicates the many dangers associated with vaccines, and have done this on multiple occasions. We do this because the safety of vaccinations is commonly pushed by the mainstream media, without ever mentioning or citing the abundant medical research that should also be taken into consideration when discussing vaccinations. Please keep in mind that there is evidence on both sides. At the same time, some of the evidence on the side that negates a positive outlook on vaccination has been labelled fraudulent, but then again many haven’t.

The vaccine-autism debate has been going on for years. It has been a tale of shifting beliefs as child vaccination rates remain high. On February 1998, Andrew Wakefield, a British gastroenterologist and his colleagues published a paper that supposedly linked Autism to Vaccines(5). More specifically, he claimed that the MMR vaccine was responsible for intestinal inflammation that led to translocation of usually non-permeable peptides to the bloodstream and, subsequently, to the brain, where they affected development(5). His work was unpublished, and he lost his medical license despite the fact multiple studies seem to support Andrew Wakefield’s work (here is one example, and here is another.) He has been labelled a fraud by the mainstream medical world, some experts claim that his research and methods are weak and based on very little evidence. Dr Wakefield’s research will NOT be used in this article.

At the same time I must mention that multiple studies from around the world have concluded that there is no link between Autism and the MMR Vaccine(5). It can become quite a confusing subject given that we have multiple medical studies contradicting each other. Was Dr. Wakefield exposing something that the medical industry did not want you to know? It is known that vaccine manufacturers suppress harmful data regarding their product, as mentioned and illustrated earlier in the article. Regardless of the MMR vaccine and autism debate, there are still a number of studies that link vaccines to a possible autism connection. Please keep in mind that multiple courts worldwide have ruled in favour of vaccines causing autism, brain damage and other complications (6)(7), that include the MMR vaccine.

Here is a great video narrated by Rob Schneider outlining the vaccine-autsim link. Below that you will find a list of 22 medical studies that show possible connections to vaccines and autism. Please keep in mind that we’ve only presented 22 studies here, there are many more published papers that document the link. Hopefully this inspires you to further your research on the subject. Also keep in mind that Autism is only one of the multiple shown consequences of vaccine administration, as they have been linked to a number of other ailments. 

 1. A study published in the Journal Annals of Epidemiology has shown that giving the Hepatitis B vaccine to newborn baby boys could triple the risk of developing an autism spectrum disorder compared to boys who were not vaccinated as neonates. The  research was conducted at Stony Brook University Medical Centre, NY.

2. A study published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry  by researchers at the Neural Dynamics Group, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia determined that Aluminum, a highly neurotoxic metal and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant may be a significant contributing factor to the rising prevalence of ASD in the Western World.  They showed that the correlation between ASD prevalence and the Aluminum adjuvant exposure appears to be the highest at 3-4 months of age. The studies also show that children from countries with the highest ASD appear to have a much higher exposure to Aluminum from vaccines. The study points out that several prominent milestones of brain development coincide with major vaccination periods for infants. These include the onset of synaptogenesis (birth), maximal growth velocity of the hippocampus and the onset of amygdala maturation. Furthermore, major developmental transition in many bio-behavioural symptoms such as sleep, temperature regulation, respiration and brain wave patterns, all of which are regulated by the neuroendocrine network. Many of these aspects of brain function are known to be impaired in autism, such as sleeping and brain wave patterns.

According to the FDA, vaccines represent a special category of drugs as they are generally given to healthy individuals. Further according to the FDA, “this places significant emphasis on their vaccine safety”. While the FDA does set an upper limit for Aluminum in vaccines at no more that 850/mg/dose, it is important to note that this amount was selected empirically from data showing that Aluminum in such amounts enhanced the antigenicity of the vaccine, rather than from existing safety. Given that the scientific evidence appears to indicate that vaccine safety is not as firmly established as often believed, it would seem ill advised to exclude paediatric vaccinations as a possible cause of adverse long-term neurodevelopment outcomes , including those associated with autism.

3. A study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues by the Department of Economics and Finance at the University of New York shows how researchers suspect one or more environmental triggers are needed to develop autism, regardless of whether individuals have a genetic predisposition or not. They determined that one of those triggers might be the “battery of vaccinations that young children receive.” Researchers found a positive and statistically significant relationship between autism and vaccinations. They determined that the higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher the prevalence of autism. A 1 % increase in vaccination was associated with an additional 680 children having autism. The results suggest that vaccines may be linked to autism and encourages more in depth study before continually administering these vaccines.

4. A study published in the Journal of Toxicology by the Department of Neurosurgery at The Methodist Neurological Institute in Houston has shown that ASD is a disorder caused by a problem in brain development. They looked at B-cells and their sensitivity levels to thimerosal, a commonly used additive in many vaccines. They determined that ASD patients have a heightened sensitivity to thimerosal which would restrict cell proliferation that is typically found after vaccination. The research shows that individuals who have this hypersensitivity to thimerosal could make them highly susceptible to toxins like thimerosal, and that individuals with a mild mitochondrial defect may be affected by thimerosal. The fact that ASD patients’ B cells exhibit hypersensitivity to thimerosal tells us something.

5. A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences determined that the autoimmunity to the central nervous system may play a causal role in autism. Researchers discovered that because many autistic children harbour elevated levels of measles antibodies, they should conduct a serological study of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and myelin basic protein (MBP) autoantibodies. They used serum samples of 125 autistic children and 92 controlled children. Their analysis showed a significant increase in the level of MMR antibodies in autistic children. The study concludes that the autistic children had an inappropriate or abnormal antibody response to MMR. The study determined that autism could be a result from an atypical measles infection that produces neurological symptoms in some children. The source of this virus could be a variant of MV, or it could be the MMR vaccine.

6. Study published in the Annals of Clinical Psychiatry  suggests that Autism is likely triggered by a virus, and that measles virus (MV and/or MMR vaccine) might be a very good candidate. It supports the hypothesis that a virus-dincued autoimmune response may play a causal role in autism.

7. A study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition determined that an increased vulnerability to oxidative stress and decreased capacity for methylation may contribute to the development and clinical manifestation of autism. It’s well known that viral infections cause increased oxidative stress. Research suggests that metals, including those found in many vaccines are directly involved in increasing oxidative stress.

8A study published by the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Northeastern University, Boston determined that a novel growth factor signalling pathway that regulates methionine synthase(MS) activity and thereby modulates methylation reactions. The potent inhibition of this pathway by ethanol, lead, mercury, aluminum and thimerosal suggests that it may be an important target of neurodevelopmental toxins. You can read more about this here, and here.  You can read more about the MS/autism link here

9A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology examined the question of what is leading to the apparent increase in autism. They expressed  that if there is any link between autism and mercury, it is crucial that the first reports of the question are not falsely stating that no link occurs. Researchers determined that a significant relation does exist between the blood levels of mercury and the diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.

10. A study published in the Journal of Child Neurology noted that autistic spectrum disorders can be associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Researchers determined that children who have mitochondrial-related dysfunctional cellular energy metabolism might be more prone to undergo autistic regression between 18 and 30 months of age if they also have infections or immunizations at the same time.

11. A study conducted by Massachusetts General Hospital at the Centre for Morphometric Analysis by the department of Paediatric Neurology illustrates how autistic brains have a growth spurt shortly after birth and then slow in growth a few short years later. Researchers have determined that neuroinflammation appears to be present in autistic brain tissue from childhood through adulthood. The study excerpt reads:

Oxidative stress, brain inflammation and microgliosis have been much documented in association with toxic exposures including various heavy metals. The awareness that the brain as well as medical conditions of children with autism may be conditioned by chronic biomedical abnormalities such as inflammation opens the possibility that meaningful biomedical interventions may be possible well past the window of maximal neuroplasticity in early childhood because the basis for assuming that all deficits can be attributed to fixed early developmental alterations in net

12, A study conducted by the Department of Paediatrics at the University of Arkansas determined that thimerosal-induced cytotoxicity was associated with the depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH) in both cell lines.  The study outlines how many vaccines have been neurotoxic, especially to the developing brain. Depletion of GSH is commonly associated with autism. Although thimerosal has been removed from most children’s vaccines, it is still present in flu vaccines given to pregnant women, the elderly and to children in developing countries.

13. A study published in the Public Library of Science (PLOS)  determined that elevation in peripheral oxidative stress is consistent with, and may contribute to more severe functional impairments in the ASD group. We know that oxidative stress is triggered by heavy metals, like the ones contained in multiple vaccines.

14. A study conducted by the University of Texas Health Science Centre by the Department of Family and Community Medicine determined that for each 1,000 Ib of environmentally released mercury, there was a 43% increase in the rate of special education services and a 61% increase in the rate of autism. Researchers emphasized that further research was needed regarding the association between environmentally released mercury and developmental disorders such as autism.

15. A study published in the International Journal of Toxicology determined that in light of the biological plausibility of mercury’s role in neurodevelopment disorders, the present study provides further insight into one possible mechanism by which early mercury exposures could increase the risk of autism.

16. A study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health determined that mercury exposure can induce immune, sensory, neurological, motor and behavioural dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with ASDs. Based upon differential diagnoses, 8 of 9 patients examined were exposed to significant mercury from Thimerosal-containing vaccine preparations during their fetal/infant developmental periods. These previously normal developing children suffered mercury encephalopathies that manifested with clinical symptoms consistent with regressive ASDs. Evidence for mercury intoxication should be considered in the differential diagnosis as contributing to some regressive ASDs.

 17. A study published by the US National Library of Medicine conducted by the University of Texas Health Science Centre suspected that persistent low-dose exposures to various environmental toxicants including mercury, that occur during critical windows of neural development among genetically susceptible children, may increase the risk for developmental disorders such as autism.

18. A study conducted by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine showed that Macaques are commonly used in pre-clinical vaccine safety testing. Collective Evolution does not support animals testing, we feel there is a large amount of evidence and research that already indicated the links to vaccines in which some animals have been used to illustrate. The objective of this study was to compare early infant cognition and behaviour with amygdala size and opioid binding in rhesus macaques receiving the recommended childhood vaccines. The animal model, which examines for the first time, behavioural, functional and neuromorphometric consequences of the childhood vaccine regimen, mimics certain neurological abnormalities of autism. These findings raise important safety issues while providing a potential model for examining aspects of causation and disease pathogenesis in acquired disorders of behaviour and development.

19. A study conducted by The George Washington University School of Public Health from the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics determined that significantly increased rate ratios were observed for autism and autism spectrum disorders as a result of exposure to mercury from Thimerosal-containing vaccines.

20. A study published in the Journal Cell Biology and Toxicology by Kinki University in Osaka, Japan determined that in combination with the brain pathology observed in patients diagnosed with autism, the present study helps to support the possible biological plausability for how low-dose exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines may be associated with autism.

21.  A study published by the Journal Lab Medicine determined that vaccinations may be one of the triggers for autism. Researchers discovered that substantial data demonstrates immune abnormality in many autistic children consistent with impaired resistance to infection, activation of inflammatory responses and autoimmunity. Impaired resistance may predispose to vaccine injury in autism.

22A study published in the Journal Neurochemical Research determined that since excessive accumulation of extracellular glutamate is linked with excitotoxicity, data implies that neonatal exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines might induce excitotoxic brain injuries, leading to neurodevelopmental disorders.

Sources:

All sources not listed below are listed throughout the article and highlighted. To view them, please click on them.

(1)http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=GSK

(2)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=twx+Major+Holders

(3)http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=ge+Major+Holders

(4) http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=pfe+Major+Holders

(5)http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/456.full

(6) http://www.ebcala.org/unanswered-questions

(7)http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/07/07/courts-rule-mmr-thimerosal-containing-vaccines-caused-autism-brain-damage/


Free Happiness Training!

Do you want to bring more happiness into your life?

Happify's activities and games are based on a decade's worth of cutting-edge research by psychologists and neuroscientists from leading academic institutions around the world.

Happify's exercises are personalized directly for you based on your unique goals.

If you are looking to bring more peace and joy into your life this year Start out with Happify for FREE!

Follow CE on Instagram!

Follow us for daily inspirations, heartwarming content, and more! @collective_evolution

×
advertisement - learn more

More From 'Awareness'

CE provides a space for free thinkers to explore and discuss new, alternative information and ideas. The goal? Question everything, think differently, spread love and live a joy filled life.

  1. There are hundreds and thousands of medical studies in process each day and they all have one thing in common, none of them ever lead to any reasonable termination of any disease, condition or illness nor do they prevent any of them. What’s that tell us?

    The answer isn’t pretty. It’s down right ugly and because of all the credentials and respect for those who do the studies the likelihood of the masses ever becoming aware of why diseases are not prevented or cured will always elude the masses.

    Blaming vaccinations for Autism cannot be taken seriously because if they were actually the cause there would no commercial research on the subject and the idea would be highly censored.

    There is no logical reason to be vaccinated and they probably are much more harmful than good but society needs to be aware of how disease continue to remain incurable and that is by pushing the blame onto something that is not the actual cause. If commercial science is willing to investigate vaccinations as being a cause for autism you can pretty much bet that it is get society to think it is caused by vaccinations and the real cause is kept secret. The real cause in my opinion is the fact that humans are devolving at a rapid rate because we are all too unaware of what is really wrong with us.

    That’s my two cents.

    Reply
    • Jonathan Phillips

      I’m struggling to understand your point of view, so I’m going to be hypocritical and ask ‘what evidence would it take for your to change your mind?’

      It feels hypocritical because I’ve not really thought about what evidence it would take for me to change my mind, and because I expect it would take a HUGE amount of evidence. I disagree quite strongly with you, I think that if everybody was making the evidence up, and everybody knew about it, there would be a few more whistles blown, and I’d have heard a lot more about it by now.
      I’ve heard a lot about some data being hidden, but little about data being made up. To change my mind, I suppose I’d have to hear about a large number of made up clinical trials: not all done by the same person or group of people or even done in the same company, and I’d also want to hear a good few people saying that ‘yes, everybody knows it’s going on’.

      I also disagree with your logic on a couple of the points, but that’s irrelevant.

      So where does your perspective come from?

      Reply
      • David Flowers: “There are hundreds and thousands of medical studies in process each day and they all have one thing in common, none of them ever lead to any reasonable termination of any disease, condition or illness nor do they prevent any of them. What’s that tell us? The answer isn’t pretty. It’s down right ugly and”

        Jonathan Phillips: “I’m struggling to understand your point of view, so I’m going to be hypocritical and ask ‘what evidence would it take for your to change your mind?’

        It feels hypocritical because I’ve not really thought about what evidence it would take for me to change my mind, and because I expect it would take a HUGE amount of evidence. I disagree quite strongly with you, I think that if everybody was making the evidence up, and everybody knew about it, there would be a few more whistles blown, and I’d have heard a lot more about it by now.
        I’ve heard a lot about some data being hidden, but little about data being made up. To change my mind, I suppose I’d have to hear about a large number of made up clinical trials: not all done by the same person or group of people or even done in the same company, and I’d also want to hear a good few people saying that ‘yes, everybody knows it’s going on’.

        I also disagree with your logic on a couple of the points, but that’s irrelevant.

        So where does your perspective come from?”

        Jonathan my perspective comes from consistently witnessing the human immune system curing, through the use of immunity, diseases “BELIEVED” to be incurable. I am also aware of drugs already on the market that do cure many different diseases that are not used or marketed to cure the diseases.

        There is only one “evidence” or “proof”, either you are cured or you are not. The how’s and why’s will always be speculation but whether you are cured or not is factual. There is no other proof or evidence, just a lot of hearsay and talk.

        As you can see my point of view is an extremely rare and unheard of point of view which is why I harp on the fact that there are no “medical studies” being done on the capacity for human immunity. You have the capacity to be immune to all disease and I am the first to tell you and I will likely be the last.

        Immunity to disease does not mean you cannot get sick, it means you cannot become diseased. There is no way to prevent short term illness in our stressful lifestyles but immunity to disease is easily achievable but not from today’s current mainstream medicine or science and that goes for natural medicine as well.

        20 or more years ago natural medicine was advancing then modern science stepped in and derailed natural healing now all natural medicine is, is a shopping cart full of products.

        I’m sure this creates conflict with you, but it boils down to ONE thing, do you have an immune system and just how much power does it have? I maintain you have the power to be completely immune to disease.

        Reply
        • vapoureyes

          “As you can see my point of view is an extremely rare and unheard of point of view which is why I harp on the fact that there are no “medical studies” being done on the capacity for human immunity. You have the capacity to be immune to all disease and I am the first to tell you and I will likely be the last.”
          Traditional homoeopathy also believes that it is only the immune system (via a dynamic second entity), that cures disease. Homoeopathic remedies sort of act as signalling agents for the healing work to begin….much like acupuncture and other allied therapies.

          Reply
        • Jonathan Phillips

          You know what’s funny. After I posted my question, you posted:
          “either today’s medical industry is too naive, inexperienced, ignorant and or stupid to come up with any real breakthrough cure or prevention or it is all a complete fraud. It has to be one or the other and nothing about health care will change if we do not accept the two only possibilities for the COMPLETE failure of today’s medicine and medical science.”
          And I thought I was beginning to understand where you were coming from. (I disagreed of course. I’d be very surprised if either of us changed our view, but I thought I was beginning to understand you.) Then you posted your reply to me, and I’m even more confused.

          First, you said
          “There is only one “evidence” or “proof”, either you are cured or you are not. The hows and whys will always be speculation but whether you are cured or not is factual. There is no other proof or evidence, just a lot of hearsay and talk.”
          And with that I can partially agree. If all you know is that one person got better, you can’t really say why. You can guess. You can test whether your guess makes other people better, but you can’t be certain why that person got better. That’s why people do clinical trials.

          But then you say stuff I don’t understand:
          “there are no “medical studies” being done on the capacity for human immunity”
          How would you study the capacity for human immunity? I imagine it could mean a number of things – what exactly do you mean?

          I suppose my biggest frustration is that you say:
          “You have the capacity to be immune to all disease and I am the first to tell you and I will likely be the last.”
          Whether that’s true or not, surely what matters is the how? Questions I’m interested in are: Will taking this drug or having that vaccination make you less likely to die of disease? Will eating less red meat mean you live longer? What about drinking tea?
          Telling people that ‘we have the capacity to cure malaria’ is nearly useless. Saying ‘taking this drug for this length of time means that a certain proportion of people with malaria see their symptoms disappear and the symptoms don’t come back in the next three years’ is much more useful. So.

          Are you saying that you have a method that makes people immune to disease?

          Also, you say “Immunity to disease does not mean you cannot get sick, it means you cannot become diseased.”
          Do you mean that ‘you might vomit occasionally but you will never have to go to a doctor’ or do you mean something else?

          Reply
          • Jonathan ASKED “How would you study the capacity for human immunity? I imagine it could mean a number of things – what exactly do you mean? I suppose my biggest frustration is that you say:
            “You have the capacity to be immune to all disease and I am the first to tell you and I will likely be the last.”
            Whether that’s true or not, surely what matters is the how?”

            There is the fly in the ointment Jonathan, having proper and full immunity to disease is not nearly as important as the HOW. You drive a car and use your computer and you don’t care how, you just do it. When it comes to immunity, it should be the same but naturally it isn’t because you have to know how or it simply cannot be something that is possible to obtain. I understand this all too well.

            When it comes to the study of the capacity for human immunity and you understanding what exactly it is I mean. I mean there is no research or study as to why some people are immune and others are not, there is no research or study about how one could help the weaker person become stronger. There is no study or research as to what really truly takes place when someone is contaminated with a pathogen and no ill effects. There is no understanding of what makes an immune system work or fail. Now you see and read information like HIV but again every word written about HIV is pure fiction and I understand I cannot prove that statement but neither can you disprove it. I can simply tell you that you are designed just like me, and like myself you can be immune to disease because you have the glands, organs and various systems that are designed to give you immunity over inferior pathogens. You are superior but of course no one tells you that, I am and I will be the last unless you start to tell yourself.

            When a person becomes diseased it is due to the simplest of malfunctions, their body simply fails to eradicate the pathogen before it takes hold and puts too much stress on the body for the body to ever get the upper hand again. It’s really as simple as that. More diseases would be cured if the diseased persons where to discontinue using antiperspirants and deodorants while getting 8 to 10 hours of quality sleep and while drinking clean water for fluids instead of coffee, tea, alcohol or other fluids.

            The science behind the immune system that could be studied if anyone other than myself studied would be the benefit of water, sleep and the POWER of the lymphatic system. The problem is, the study of the immune system would lead to full immunity and that is why no one cares to study it. That is why just the idea of having immunity strikes you odd and confuses you.

            Jonathan ASKED, “Questions I’m interested in are: Will taking this drug or having that vaccination make you less likely to die of disease? Will eating less red meat mean you live longer? What about drinking tea?”

            Drugs and vaccinations will not make you less likely to die from disease. The only thing that will save a person from death by what is known as “cancer” is an accident, heart attack or something that kills a person before they get a chance to be diagnosed with cancer. The masses use drugs and get vaccinated yet the masses die from disease so no they do not help.

            Eating more red meat will be healthier because red meat does not weaken the immune system at all, not even in the slightest however carbs and sugars feed fungus and fungus is a pathogen and fungus destroys everything, crops, wildlife and humans. Some Oncologist (cancer doctors) know “cancer” is fungus. They are hated for that particular knowledge and attacked without mercy. It doesn’t matter what “cancer” is if you are immune to it, but like you said, knowing is more important than having immunity. I understand, though I disagree.

            Tea has no health benefit at all. Matter of fact if it is caffeinated or has other natural chemicals in it, it will be a health hazard. Green tea, like coffee tax the lymphatic system to the brink. If your lymphatic system is removing the components of green tea instead of whatever pathogens you can kill, you are clearly using your tools for something they shouldn’t be forced to do. Everything about health and healing today is about selling something, that’s it. You have the capacity to be immune to disease without buying a thing and that is why the prospects of being immune is so hard to even imagine. BUY BUY BUY, that’s medicine, western and natural and nothing you buy will save you from disease.

            Jonathan ASKED, “Are you saying that you have a method that makes people immune to disease?”

            I don’t know how I drive a car Jonathan, I don’t know how I am typing this comment to you, I just know I send signals from brain to body and low and behold I drive or type. Immune failure is nothing but over stress and failure to send proper signals, nothing more. You learned to drive and type because you could physically watch and see that your signals were sent and received properly. However with immunity there is no physical confirmation that can be seen instantly or almost instantly. Because you cannot see or confirm when you make a proper immune communication you never attempt it. That is the science I am involved with and what I have perfected. I have set my body back to factory default immune settings through years of study, research and work. I’m not bullet proof but I can handle my immune system the same as I can handle a car or play golf. The reason I can is because I wanted to so I did. Because full immunity is unimaginable today nobody wants it.

            I figured out why placebos once worked, they no longer work today because mainstream science convinced consumers that it was bad to cure diseases with placebos that and the medical industry took over natural medicine and now set the curriculum for training. Make no mistake, a placebo is just a product that helps a person send a proper immune signal. It’s just a learning or training aid. I can produce and reproduce the needed signals that create proper immunity.

            Jonathan ASKED, “Also, you say “Immunity to disease does not mean you cannot get sick, it means you cannot become diseased.” Do you mean that ‘you might vomit occasionally but you will never have to go to a doctor’ or do you mean something else?

            Outside of trauma I will be unlikely that I need to go to a doctor. If you are out in the population in the middle of nasty seasons where so many people are sick you are taking in pathogens with every breath you take. When you are well rested and relaxed you kill the pathogens without any signs or symptoms from them. If I skip a night’s sleep to say, salmon fish all night my immune system will be weak and if the salmon fisherman right next to me is hacking and coughing I might start hacking and coughing before I can catch up on the sleep I missed, I would be sick but if I use wisdom and take myself right to bed when I am done and if I send the proper signals to reboot my immune system I could be back in action after a 10 or 12 hour sleep and lots of water. If I ingest something that is nasty my immune system’s first response is to eject through vomit or diarrhea so I will vomit or get diarrhea though it is very very rare.

            I’m going to keep getting old and I am going to die and maybe if I live to be 110 without falling off a cliff my immune system might fail out of old age and a disease might kill be, but it will be in very old age and it will be fast, it will be dying of old age. Immunity is just like driving a car just without the physical confirmation and if anyone cared to study it they would surely give you a juicy explanation but the last thing anyone in science or medicine wants to see is you being immune to disease. Immunity means no more medicine, no more medical industry. Wisdom and immunity go hand and hand. I’m not gloating, just saying immunity changes everything.

            Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      I don’t understand what you mean, there are a number of studies that link vaccines to possible autism causation. There is no blame in this article..:) It’s not all about ‘commercial studies’ and given the fact that our mainstream media promotes many vaccinations and controls the perception of a large mass of humanity, I doubt they are trying to scare people into not taking a vaccine.It seems like they try to scare people into taking it! lol

      Thanks for sharing :)

      • “22 Medical Studies That Show Vaccines Can Cause Autism”

        I have to be honest, I based my comment off of the title. The title is a statement that many people are accepting as truth these days.

        “Medical Studies” is the red flag. Today’s and most of yesterday’s medical studies are done for one purpose, to maintain the industry of disease, suffering and conditions such as Autism.

        “Medical studies” will never reveal the true cause of Autism because the second that is done, Autism is no longer a viable industry. There simply isn’t enough truth about any disease or condition for any “medical study” to hold water or be valid which is why the “medical studies” are nothing more than studies, they never amount to anything more than studies. They receive ungodly amounts of money to do studies and they never ever have to show a cure or prevention.

        It was your article about cancer science being a fraud that brought me to CE, that was brilliant but now it has no sting because people think it is an isolated case. All “medical science” today is a fraud. I know many reading this now are stepping back and thinking to themselves that my cheese has slid off of my cracker but there can only be one truth, either today’s medical industry is too naive, inexperienced, ignorant and or stupid to come up with any real breakthrough cure or prevention or it is all a complete fraud. It has to be one or the other and nothing about health care will change if we do not accept the two only possibilities for the COMPLETE failure of today’s medicine and medical science.

        With today’s technology and all the unlimited resources it can only mean ONE thing in my opinion and that is that all 22 “Medical Studies” That Show Vaccines Can Cause Autism are fraudulent just like every medical study. God bless trauma medicine because it has merit, we can’t buy a lifetime of drugs if we die in a car accident.

        If we want to prevent Autism or cure it we the people will have to find the cause of it or improve ourselves through proper evolution so we are no longer subject to such conditions. It is our responsibility, not medical science’s responsibility. Autism is already preventable but to offer such prevention to the public will devastate the economy because preventing Autism will prevent hundreds of other conditions. It is almost impossible to prevent one disease without preventing another dozen or more. That is why medical science intentionally fails.

        It’s UGLY and for economic purposes it all makes perfect sense.

        Reply
        • - Collective Evolution

          I disagree, I think there is validity in many medical studies, as well as flaws. Many don’t receive ‘ungodly’ amounts of money, and many are actually publicly funded due to the fact that the medical industry does not want to fund them! It’s clear that many ‘medical’ studies do show industry bias. I think we have identified a possible cause for Autism here, I also don’t think every single medical study is scientific fraud, but I do agree some of them are.

          • It’s OK to disagree about validity of medical studies as long as we agree on the overall lack of effectiveness of medicine. If you believe in medical studies you almost have to believe that science is not capable of curing disease, meaning scientist today are simply not able to get the job done in other words they are ineffective. Even public funded science is extremely profitable, maybe more profitable.

            People have been screaming “vaccines cause Autism” for more than 20 years, it is not new information. Your article here will hopefully create enough doubt in vaccinations so that some may decide to give the human immune system the benefit of the doubt, after all that is what we are dealing with.

            People use vaccines because they have no faith in their own immune system. Science and “medical studies” teach and sway people to believe they are too fragile to be healthy without today’s medicine. Again, there are no medical studies being done on the human capacity for immunity other than myself and I have no funding.

            I have personally contacted many universities, medias, research centers and institutions and I have yet to find one interested in the human immune system. It may be an unfair challenge, but I will present it, find any institution you feel might be credible and find out if they would be interested in eliminating any suffering through the use of the human immune system alone.

            To suggest a medical study is valid would suggest that the people behind it are indeed searching for cures and true health improvements at any cost and I can tell you it does not exist.

            If people stop using vaccines, overall health will likely improve unless they stop without confidence in themselves in which case they will always be leery of not using the vaccines and then stress will build and health will fail. Fear of disease is often more harmful than disease itself.

            Reply
            • - Collective Evolution

              I do agree that there is a large lack of effectiveness, but I do believe that there is a tremendous potential for growth and expansion especially with health, and many more than involve non physical science and metaphysics.

              My intent is not to create doubt, only to indicate and present research on both sides. I agree about the immune system, it should be used more, it’s quite a touchy subject and I think more people will realize there are two sides to the vaccine story as we move towards 2014.

              We all have our opinions, I just wanted to provide this information. Many people including me and you derive different conclusions as a result of different perspectives and more. But eventually, we will al come to one big realization one day:) Whatever it may be

  2. Thiomersal (the form of mercury in the above studies) was removed from most vaccines (except some flu and tetanus, which isn’t generally given to infants), around 2001, as a precautionary measure. None of today’s current vaccines contain it.

    Reply
    • MikeB

      Unfortunately flu vaccines are given to infants. The CDC recommends that everyone 6 months of age and older get a seasonal flu vaccine. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/children.htm

      Tetanus vaccine is given to infants as it is included in the DTaP vaccination (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis). Some of these vaccinations (DT (Sanofi & DTaP Tripedia) do still have mercury/Thimerosol.

      In Australia, until March 2013. This is significant because the government claimed that thimerosal had been removed from all childhood vaccines by 2000 yet it was still listed in the infant Hepatitis B vaccine and the Fluad and Fluarix influenza vaccines until 2013. Thimerosal was also listed in the Infanrix hexa vaccine in 2010 – the new 6 vaccines in one shot.

      So to say that “None of today’s current vaccines contain it.” is an incorrect statement.

      If you understand the issue you will start to understand that mercury is not the only issue, its the cumulative oxidative stress and the vaccine adjutants (not only mercury – thimerosol) contribute or cause to this problem. The big picture is starting to show there may be a genetic predisposition as obviously not every child who is vaccinated develops autism.

      Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      True, but it has not been removed from the flu vaccine as you mentioned. It’s also still prevalent in vaccines given to the elderly as well as in vaccines administered in developing nations. I think we are really seeing a lot the effects from those previously administered vaccines right now.

      • One thing we should all know for certain is that Vaccines are used to build and maintain a strong industry. I doubt there is ONE healthy reason to be vaccinated. I have never vaccinated any of my dogs and my dogs are high performance sporting dogs and none of them ever get sick or ever get parvo while all the vaccinated dogs are dropping like flies. I raise my dogs to have an immune system and they are immune to parvo and cancer.

        Reply
  3. MikeB

    This is a seriously good article. The vaccine issue is such a hard subject to understand let alone articulate as there are so many sub layers to the issue. Arjun’s grasp of this complex subject and his ability to put it in a meaningful discourse is amazing. Good job!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Collective Evolution welcomes differing viewpoints and thought-provoking opinions that add value to the discussion, but comments may be moderated to remove profanity or remarks that detract from a healthy conversation. For the best interest of the community, please refrain from posting vulgar comments, profanity, or personal attacks. Comments submitted may automatically be flagged for review by our moderation team before appearing on the website.

Featured TEDx Talk

TEDx - Agents of Change

Free Exclusive Film Screening!

Free Film Screening
advertisement - learn more

CETV - What's On

Published: Jun 23, 2015

Subscribe:
Connect, Inspire, Chat & Share!
CE Radio - Listen now!
advertisement - learn more
Amazers
Subscribe to CE Magazine Monthly For Exclusive Content!
The Mind Unleashed

We Recommend

www.truththeory.com

Trending Now

meat

15 Horrifying Facts About Processed Meat

Below is a video we came across from BuzzFeed that outlines several disturbing facts about processed meat. Processed meat usually means anything more manipulated than cut or ground. This includes most lunch-meats found in the deli, or anything that has a…