What Parents Need To Know About Monsanto: “By 2025 One In Two Children Will Be Autistic”


breath
advertisement - learn more

“Children today are sicker than they were a generation ago. From childhood cancers to autism, birth defects and asthma, a wide range of childhood diseases and disorders are on the rise. Our assessment of the latest science leaves little room for doubt; pesticides are one key driver of this sobering trend.” October 2012 report by Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) (source)(source)

In 1975, 1 in every 5000 would develop autism. In 1985, it was 1 in every 2,500. In 1995 , it was 1 in every 500, in 2005 in was 1 in every 166 and today it is approximately 1 in every 68 children. This is exactly why scientists are making some extraordinary statements. (source)

‘If it is an environmental cause that’s contributing to an increase, we certainty want to find it.” – Craig Newschaffer, an epidemiologist at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (source)

Research continues to surface indicating that autism goes far beyond just genetics. It’s showing us that we might have to look at multiple factors (like environmental toxins, prescription drugs, etc) when trying to figure out what’s going on, and why autism rates continue to climb exponentially.

“It’s time to start looking for the environmental culprits responsible for the remarkable increase in the rate of autism in California.”  – Irva Hertz–Picciotto, epidemiology professor at University of California, David (source)

A sufficent amount of evidence is now pointing to the fact that agricultural pesticides (among various other environmental toxins) might play a large role in the rapid increase in autism rates over the past few decades. A senior researcher from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Dr. Stephanie Seneff is doing her part to create more awareness of these facts that have yet to make big news in the world of mainstream medicine.

At a recent event sponsored by the holistic-focused Groton Wellness Organization, she stated that:

“At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.” (source)

Seneff presented slides showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the rising use of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide(with its active ingredient glyphosate) on crops and the rising rates of autism;  it definitely gives researchers plenty to think about, especially considering her research into the side effects of autism mimic glyphosate toxicity and deficiencies.

1

Correlation Doesn’t Mean Causation, But…

Although the graph depicts a staggering correlation, it does not “prove” that the rise in autism is directly a cause of glyphosate. On the other hand, we have a lot of information and research available that suggests it could be one factor (out of many) and Dr. Seneff argues that it is. Pesticides have been linked to a number of human health ailments from Parkinson’s, to Alzheimer’s, to cancer and autism. You can access some of those studies (out of many) here.

Dr. Seneff, through her research, also believes that aluminum containing vaccines may also be a culprit. You can read more about that, and access that research here.

The Toxicity of Glyphosate and Autism

In the lecture Dr. Seneff gave, she pointed to the fact that Monsanto commonly argues that glyphosate is not toxic (despite numerous studies showing how toxic it is) because our cells don’t have what is called the “shikimate” pathway.  What’s important to note however, is that our guts do indeed have this pathway and we depend on it to supply us with essential amino acids (among other things).  Gut health is of utmost importance to overall health, so this is quite disturbing. Seneff also points to the fact that there are other ingredients within glyphosate that greatly increases its toxic effects.

It makes one wonder doesn’t it? How could a corporation like Monsanto (a corporation charged with regulating our global food supply) claim that glyphosate is safe despite all of the evidence that confirms that it’s not?

“It is commonly believed that Roundup is among the safest pesticides… Despite its reputation, Roundup was by far the most toxic among the herbicides and insecticides tested. This inconsistency between scientific fact and industrial claim may be attributed to huge economic interests, which have been found to falsify health risk assessments and delay health policy decisions.” – R. Mesnage et al., Biomed Research International, Volume 2014 (2014) article ID 179691

Keep in mind that the use of glyphosate rose 1500% from 1995 to 2005, and that 100 million pounds of glyphosate is used every year on more than a billion acres. (Cherry B. GM crops increase herbicide use in the United States. Science in Society 45, 44-46, 2010)(source)

It’s even been found in the breast milk of mothers, and in urine samples of people across Europe. (source)

The main toxic effects of glyphosate identified by Dr. Seneff are as follows:

  • Kills beneficial gut bacteria and allows pathogens to overgrow
  • Interferes with function of cytochrome p450 (CYP enzymes)
  • Chelates important minerals (iron, cobalt, manganese, etc)
  • Interferes with synthesis of aromatic amino acids and methionine – leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate
  • Disrupts sulfate synthesis and sulfate transport

Pesticide formulations that are sold and used are up to 1000 times more toxic than what regulators commonly claim. Roundup is in fact the most toxic of herbicides and insecticides used. There is a tremendous amount of evidence that also point to flawed safety evaluations. You can read more about that here.

“Adjuvants in pesticides are generally declared as inerts and for this reason they are not tested in long-term regulatory experiments. It is thus very surprising that they amplify up to 1000 times the toxicity of their Active Principles in 100 % of the cases where they are indicated to be present by the manufacturer.” – R. Mesnage et al., Biomed Research International, Volume 2014 (2014) article ID 179691

Seneff notes a number of well known “bio-markers of autism.” These include low serum sulfate, disrupted gut bacteria, inflammatory bowel, serotonin and melatonin deficiency, mitochondrial disorder, zinc and iron deficiency and more.  She also points to the fact that:

“These can all be explained as potential effects of glyphosate on biological systems.”  

Dr. Seneff goes into much greater detail, and to access that science you can click HERE.  To access most of her recent research of these topics you can click HERE. To view her entire lecture you can click HERE.

Beyond Dr. Seneff. More Research.

“The change in how agriculture is produced has brought, frankly, a change in the profile of diseases. We’ve gone from a pretty healthy population to one with a high rate of cancer, birth defects and illnesses seldom seen before. The tobacco companies denied the link between smoking and cancer, and took decades to recognize the truth. The biotech and agrochemical corporations are the same as the tobacco industry; they lie and favor business over the health of the population.” – Dr. Medardo Avila Vazquez, a pediatrician specializing in environmental health (source)(source)(source) (Related CE Article on the GMO/Cancer link in Argentina here)

There is a tremendous amount of recent research being conducted that has looked into the role of environmental toxins (agricultural pesticides are one of them) in autism.

For example, A study coming out of the University of California Davis, determined that pregnant women who live in close proximity to land and farms where chemical pesticides are/were applied experience a two-thirds increased risk of having a child with autism spectrum disorder or some other developmental disorder.

“This study validates the results of earlier research that had reported associations between having a child with autism and prenatal exposure to agricultural chemicals in California. While we still must investigate whether certain sub-groups are more vulnerable to exposures to these compounds than others, the message is very clear: Women who are pregnant should take special care to avoid contact with agricultural chemicals whenever possible.”  – Janie F. Shelton, a UC Davis graduate student who now consults with the United Nations, lead author of the study. (source)

You can read more about that HERE.

A new study published in the journal PLOS Computational Biology, from researchers at the University of Chicago revealed that autism and intellectual disability (ID) rates are linked with exposure to harmful environmental factors during congenital development. (source)

In another case, a group of scientists put together a comprehensive review of existing data that shows how European regulators have known that Monsanto’s glyphosate causes a number of birth and brain malformations since at least 2002. Regulators misled the public about glyphosate’s safety, and in Germany the Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety told the European Commission that there was no evidence to suggest that glyphosate causes birth defects. (source)  In fact there is plenty of research confirming that mothers who are exposed to commonly used, “safe” pesticides give birth to children with lower intelligence, structural brain abnormalities, behavioural disorders, compromised motor skills, higher rates of brain cancer and small head size. You can read more about that here.

The list goes on and on, and you can access more studies that are a cause for concern HERE.

“What’s appalling is that we have known about these dangers for decades yet have done little about it. Nearly 20 years ago, scientists at the National Research Council called for swift action to protect young and growing bodies from pesticides. Yet today, U.S. children continue to be exposed to pesticides that are known to be harmful in places they live, learn and play.” – Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) (source)

Sources:

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/glyphosate/Groton_Seneff.pdf

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/glyphosate/Seneff_AutismOne_2014.pdf

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/

http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003518

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111102/pdf/479022a.pdf

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1307044/

http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/newsroom/8978

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/autism-rise-driven-by-environment/

http://www.emagazine.com/earth-talk/pesticides-and-childrens-health

http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416


Free Happiness Training!

Do you want to bring more happiness into your life?

Happify's activities and games are based on a decade's worth of cutting-edge research by psychologists and neuroscientists from leading academic institutions around the world.

Happify's exercises are personalized directly for you based on your unique goals.

If you are looking to bring more peace and joy into your life this year Start out with Happify for FREE!

Free Happiness Training!

What if you could train happiness? Try FREE with Happify! Start personalized excerises based on your unique goals.

×
advertisement - learn more

More From 'Alternative News'

CE provides a space for free thinkers to explore and discuss new, alternative information and ideas. The goal? Question everything, think differently, spread love and live a joy filled life.

  1. Andrea

    You have a typo in the 2nd paragraph. I am assuming it is 1975…then 1985, etc. Normally I not picky, but its a impact article.

    Reply
    • Kenny

      it’s* an* impact article.

      Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      Awesome thanks so much for pointing that out, fixed it :)!

  2. Dave Martin

    The whole autism is connected to vaccinations thing will go down in history as one of the biggest lies and smoke screens ever presented to the general public. As someone who is a currently qualified applicator and a Ministry of The Environment certificate holder for over 17 years I have been stating for a very long time that it is the vast amount of pesticide use that is the real and true culprit behind many neurological ailments that are on the rise in our children. If you check the history of the rise of these neurological ailments they all coincide with the increased dependence and use of pesticides at all levels of agriculture. Many of the pesticides used are known to cause various disorders. That is a given fact.
    I suggest parents do research on pesticides and read what the threshold LD ( lethal dose ) levels are and the chronic cumulative effects of long term daily exposure to various pesticides and pesticide residue from all sources like water , food , and air on the human body. It is there that you will find an answer…my bet is you won’t like what you find.
    Here is a link to help people get started…
    http://www.pan-europe.info/…/pesticides/cum_syn_effects.html

    Reply
    • Jason

      Curious if Amish children would be a good study case as the Amish farm a lot but from what I understand do not use pesticides.

      Reply
      • Rodney

        Amish children also do not receive Vaccinations. I do agree with everything Dave wrote aside form the Vaccination piece, as multiple gastrointestinal studies confirm the linkage to specific ingredients unique to vaccines (along with internal large intestine scrapes) that show thimerosal in the walls of the large intestine. It doesn’t take much actual research to determine that vaccines are the #1 cause in autism. Go ask a parent of an autistic child.

        Reply
  3. rthurs666

    More blather. Yesterday there was a newspaper article linking autism to air pollution. it has previously been blamed on fluoride in water, childhood vaccination, mercury in dental fillings, high fructose corn syrup, lead in gasoline/paint, food preservatives and almost anything else. The simple fact 9is that we don’t know what causes autism. And there may be more than one disease process involved.

    Statistical links are suspect. The chart you posted starts i n 1991 because that was when they started keeping records on autism. But I knew children in the 1940’s, 1950’s and 1960’s who had all the symptoms of autism. Around 1900, Babe Ruth was put in an orphanage because of behaviour problems – he had two parents, but was difficult to control. Today he would be labeled as “autistic.”

    Here’s a challenge for you. Use the same chart on reported autism cases since 1990 and track that against any of the following:

    1. Use of mobile phones (cell phones)
    2. Use of personal computers.
    3. Growth of the Internet.
    4. Sales of Viagra and its clones.
    5 Sales of video and audio disks.

    You’ll find the same level or correlation. But is anybody willing to claim the video disks cause autism?

    Statistical correlation is not proof.

    Reply
    • Gina

      You wouldn’t know autism if it slapped you in the face. Whatever “autism” you witnessed in the 50’s, 60’s or any time earlier than the 90’s has absolutely nothing to do with the freaking epidemic we are dealing with now. Get your head out of the sand. While you are at, go observe an autism classroom at a public school and do a headcount. We have kids who are 8 years old, unable to communicate and are still wearing diapers. I don’t remember ANYONE like that going to school with me when I was a kid!!!

      Reply
      • Kasey

        Gina,a certain type of air pollution is closer to the truth than you may think.a bacteria which is airbourne,is inhaled and has the ability to alter the simplest of viruses into Leukeamia viruses(retrovirus).responsible for cancers ,CJD, diabetes,asthma,eczema,and many more deseases.CJD/BSE research show Psattaci mutates a virus into the HTLV2 Leukeamia virus.this bacteria and virus misfold normal cell protein to trigger cancer mutation of infected cells,Trogan horse viruses that lie in wait for opportunistic infection,other infection causes these viruses to vacate the host cell(viral machrophagic action)taking host cell DNA causing cell death,or cellular death of the brain(autism),live vaccines should not be given,although naturally occurring infections will result in the same outcomes. Gangrene that occurs in bacterial meningitis occurs due to cellular death when the virus attacks the bacteria .
        Psattaci is a bacteria that is quite unique in the way it infects cells similar to viral cell infection.To say antibiotics cannot treat viruses is not correct,treating Leukeamia viruses with an antibiotic and antiviral has shown positive results.

        Fruit bats carry the Ebola virus without effect,why,because they don’t carry a form or strain of the human Leukeamia virus,

        This little secret keeps the medical and pharmaceutical professions in business at the expense of the misinformed,who benefits? The elite,

        Reply
    • Mick

      Toxic-overload. Environmental toxins. That’s it.

      Reply
    • Laura

      You make a good point…let me also say that everything you listed, while it may not cause autism, is all harmful to us. Maybe we need to stop spending so much time trying to figure out specific causes and more time avoiding things we KNOW are toxic to our bodies.

      Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      There are definitely multiple factors that contribute, I believe! I think it’s clear that our toxic cumulative environment doesn’t help.

  4. Mykael David

    It seems to point to something for sure… I must say though, references are NOT sources. Sources are peer reviewed published studies. Not quotes or unverifiable hyperbole. Please change the list from “sources” to “references.”

    Reply
  5. Dave Bailey

    As far as I know, there has been no increase in cognitive impairments in children. The apparent increase in autism is a result of better diagnoses, and realignment into the autism spectrum of conditions that were previously classified differently.

    Reply
    • Mick

      In the 1970s, the autism rate was one in every 10,000 kids and almost no one knew anyone with autism. That changed when the definition was broadened in 1994 to include other behaviors doctors were seeing in children. At that point the numbers exploded.
      1995 1:500
      2001 1:250
      2004 1:166
      2007 1:150
      2009 1:110
      2012 1:88
      2013 1:50
      Some people claim that all the autism is the result of better diagnosing of a disorder that’s always been around. If that were true, the rate would have leveled out between 1995 and 2000, after the definition was changed in 1994. That hasn’t happened.

      Reply
      • Dave Bailey

        ^^ Citation needed.

        Reply
  6. Kev

    I’m going to tell a little known secret,In the late 90s I discovered a bacterium found in bird feases that has the ability to change viruses into Leukeamia (retroviruses) leaving a infectious protein,these proteins are the Cancer causing agents,because this bacterium is inhaled and we all have at sometime had chickenpox then we all carry one or more of these viruses without knowing it,They are passed on to siblings causing heireditary illnesses.cancer clusters found around refuse dumps,power stations,overhead electric cables are due to bird feases,this is the Enviromental factor that nobody has taken into account,not pesticides.

    Reply
    • David

      Ken, can you point me to some more information on what you have said, please? >David

      Reply
      • Kev

        David,have tried to reply to Meg on the same subject,keep being blocked,strange that,don’t have that problem when replying to you ?

        Reply
      • Kev

        David,a group of bacteria that act like a virus when invading cells using reverse transcriptase into single strand RNA when invading a host cell,when this happens to viral cells a viral evolution occurs,in the case of the Herpes Symplex family of viruses a infectious protein called a prion ,a misfolded protein due to reverse transcriptase action of the bacteria and the evolved retrovirus alike on host cells.these proteins are the cause of all cancers,the viruses are slow viruses that cause old age,we all carry one or more of these viruses,natures way of keeping population down.hope this is of help,what is your interest.just as a footnote these viruses are slow viruses that reside within our DNA Trogan Horse viruses until an opportunistic infection enters the blood were the virus attacks taking host cell DNA effectively killing off the host cell,CJD victims have spongiform appearance to the brain due to lack of DNA in host cell capsid,when the MMR is administered a similar reaction occurs causing autism,

        Reply
    • Walrus

      By your inability to properly spell the word poop I conclude you are unlikely to be a bacteruim discoverer.

      Reply
    • Meg

      I’m quite confused about what you’re trying to say.
      Retroviruses can transform essentially any cell if the viral genome integrates upstream of an oncogene and promotes the expression of certain proteins that allow dysregulation of the cell cycle. This is a very inefficient process, and one infected and transformed cell does not spread a generic “cancer protein” to other cells. A more efficient way for a virus to cause cancer is for the virus to acquire a host oncogene (generally in place of its own replication gene) and coinfect a cell with another virus that is able to help it replicate, as in the case of feline sarcoma. Bacteria may be more susceptible to transformation as they carry phage plasmids that could recombine with the viral genome but bacteria from any source are not necessary to transmit retroviruses to humans. Viruses in general have specific host tropisms and tend to infect species-specific cells. I’m not sure what your point is here. Yes, bacteria can be inhaled but this causes an upper respiratory disease, pneumonia, serositis, etc. They do not cause cancer… they cause an inflammatory immune reaction. Cancer biology is not as simple as transmitting a bacterial protein to human cells to cause cell cycle dysregulation. And to my knowledge, the only “infectious proteins” known are prions, i.e. bovine spongiform encephalopathy.
      Also, chickenpox is a herpesvirus, not a retrovirus. This type of virus does not integrate into host DNA, but it remains latent in ganglia, clusters of neuron cell bodies. This also does not cause cancer…. could cause shingles in older or immunocompromised individuals. Again, not cancer. Not even close.
      I’m also not understanding your comment on horizontal and vertical transfer of… virus? Cancer? Passing cancer onto our siblings as a hereditary disease? Horizontal transfer of viruses is common, yes. It is only hereditary (i.e. able to be transmitted vertically) after horizontal transfer if it happens to infect your gametes or your fetus. Gamete infection is very unlikely. If you become infected with a virus during pregnancy, the fetus may become infected with the virus. At certain stages of gestation this can lead to a persistently infected and tolerant individual, an abortion, or if late enough, nothing.
      It seems to me like this research on fecal bacteria and virology is theoretical, not clinical. What bacteria do in a dish does not reflect what human cells do in vivo. You should be careful about telling people these things as not everyone understands that differentiation.

      Reply
    • lmfao… the sad thing is how many people will look at your stringing together random words, not understand them, and repeat what you said as gospel xD also this article is bullshit, autism is on the rise because of psychiatrists slapping that diagnoses on people much more freely

      Reply
      • rehtoMyzarC

        I have a child with ASD, there’s no mistake on her diagnosis. Just the opposite. She has been tested for everything under the sun. Finally, I had an answer. I first thought get your child under control before she’s completely out of hand. Believe me spankings, grounded, taking electronics doesn’t help with children with Autism. Read on it madgnomegamer, its horrible and they don’t grow out of it. You’ve probably dated someone with ASD and thought they were just stalkers.

        Reply
      • Mick

        In the 1970s, the autism rate was one in every 10,000 kids and almost no one knew anyone with autism. That changed when the definition was broadened in 1994 to include other behaviors doctors were seeing in children. At that point the numbers exploded.
        1995 1:500
        2001 1:250
        2004 1:166
        2007 1:150
        2009 1:110
        2012 1:88
        2013 1:50
        Some people claim that all the autism is the result of better diagnosing of a disorder that’s always been around. If that were true, the rate would have leveled out between 1995 and 2000, after the definition was changed in 1994. That hasn’t happened.

        Reply
      • care package

        Your diagnoses is bullshit. I know a guy in his 70s that’s been a shrink for most of that and it pisses him off when he hears that bullshit. He says the diagnoses for autism hasn’t changed. It’s still the same. I guess in your world 1 in 68 people all throughout history have been autistic and no one knew.
        People who make that claim are usually humanists. You have to come up with some sort of explanation other than ‘things are getting worse’ because it goes against the grain of your religion/belief system.

        Reply
      • Kev

        Sadly,I don’t need to be ignorant or arrogant about what I discovered, I spent a lot of time researching this, with that knowledge ,I would like to think that I can pass it on to help people be better informed,I don’t do that lightly,as I am aware of the implications of such knowledge.If people want to repeat what they have read then they can in the belief that it is correct.

        Reply
  7. Gwen

    Good article. 100% correct. Should be screamed on the nightly news. Also, Glyphosates use on wheat, grains, vegetables will only eliminate profits from businesses, because people cannot digest them.. If you want profits, stop using GMOs & Glyphosate…duh. USDA/EPA has increased the allowable levels for what…so they can kill sales? Good job being stupid.

    The only winner is Monstinkin’. All other businesses stand to LOSE MONEY for using products people cannot consume.

    How many people are off bread, sugar, sodas, corn chips, soy anything, etc. because they feel horrible when they eat them? All sales LOST. Too bad, short sighted A-holes.

    PEOPLE FIRST.

    Reply
    • Henry Holterman

      The NWO’s Eugenics program in it’s sneakiest incarnation – MonSATAN!

      Reply
    • “100% correct” seems like a huge stretch for this nonsense. In science, correlation doesn’t mean causation. I can show you similar graphs which indicate that global warming is caused by the reduction of sea pirates. What they have failed to mention is how much the autism spectrum has grown over the last few decades. So has our ability to properly diagnose learning disabilities. If you look at the spectrum as a whole, numbers increase because of these two things. But, if you look at each disorder under the spectrum individually, their numbers haven’t really budged at all.

      Reply
      • Are you fo’ real?

        Reply
  8. John

    http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1206187/ Pollution linked to autism. More importantly, it shows correlation. (Really, what does LINKED mean?) Note, at the conclusion of the study the authors recommend “future studies should consider sex-specific biological pathways connecting perinatal exposure to pollutants with ASD.” That is, they don’t know how (or if) pollution causes autism but further studies designed to answer that important question need to be performed. At this point, pollution might still be driving behaviors (or drive people into other environments) that cause autism.

    Seriously, “linked” is fast becoming a catch-all scare word, fear-mongering. Admit it.

    Reply
    • Putting sanctions on Russia is actually good for Russia because now instead of relying on European goods and services they can develop their own along with their partner , China. Also it keeps the poison GMO food out of Russia that is being pushed on the rest of the EU. Another good thing is that Russia won’t have to put up with illegal immigrants.

      Reply
    • Mick

      Pollution and Glyphosates are both environmental toxins.

      Reply
  9. dan

    The chemicals have all been tested and planned for the depopulation agenda. Sterilization, cancer $$$ and death. The alphabet organizations are set up as a front to make sure the herds get their proper allotment of poisons. They are the Nazi’s of I.G Farben and we are the prisoners of Auschwitz.

    Reply
    • lolo

      you clearly dont know what you´re talking about. also, 6 million people were killed by the nazis, how about showing some respect?

      Reply
      • the eternal victimisation of the people killed in wwII… what they use to carry on the agenda… no one believes the holohaux anymore mate

        Reply
  10. Here is a great podcast featuring Dr. Seneff in which she explains more about her findings. I highly recommend listening to it – http://fearlessparent.org/radio-blog-gmos-and-vaccines-episode-48/

    Reply
  11. The majority of Amish do vaccinate their children. I sometimes wonder where the anti vaxxers get their information. Not from the Amish, it appears. http://blogs.plos.org/thepanicvirus/2011/06/28/anecdotal-amish-dont-vaccinate-claims-disproved-by-fact-based-study/

    Reply
  12. George

    Take a look at her actual presentation in the links above. There are a number of interesting relationships between herbicide use and the skyrocketing rates of autism, dementia, kidney failure and Inflammatory bowel disease.

    Some people argue that there is not enough organic food for everyone and they are right. But luckily her articles point to certain sensitive times such as pregnancy, spermatogenesis, and the first few years of development that are the most critical times to have a herbicide/pesticide free diet. I think I could go organic for 3 years for my child.

    Do yourself a favor and spend 5 minutes reading one of the PDFs

    Reply
  13. So a child who shows signs of a greater intelligence, who is highly emotional, who does not feel he/she can relate to the “normal” humanoids, who has a much higher level of creativity than the average joe, who does not conform to or subdues to the current education system is labelled Autistic? What’s the current kickback percentage that psychiatrists get these days from big pharma, 25%? Which one pays more?

    Reply
    • JIll Reichhoff

      I couldn’t have said it better myself. I often wonder if this is just a natural evolution of the human brain. of course, the ones who cant keep up must then categorize those who think and reason differently because they cant quite grasp the way these people think. maybe its the “normal” people who are intellectually inferior because they are unable to understand the way the evolving and evolved minds work.

      Reply
      • J.

        Clearly neither one of you have ever worked with a person with Autism. Yes, some folks on the spectrum have incredible intelligence and talent, but many many people with Autism will never be able to live or work independently, will never be able to communicate effectively with others or experience “normal” life as the rest of us know it. Ask any parent with an Autistic child – this disease is not just “natural evolution of the human brain”.

        Reply
  14. Kev

    I would question that the ailments are caused by the toxins mentioned.Gut bacteria for instance can be destroyed by viruses.retroviruses have evolved from chlamydial infections,one such virus HTLV2 has evolved from the chlamydial strain Psattaci and is inhaled,once the leukeamia virus has evolved it’s passed on to siblings at birth,causing heireditary deseases.these viruses are Trogan Horse type viruses as they reside within host cell DNA, host cell death occurs when viral expression from the host cell occurs during another opportunistic infection(viral machrophage )

    Reply
  15. Ben

    guys these guys will show you the problem and i have the solution! i found a completely honest company that is dedicated to help you with your health, wellness, and your finances. i truely believe this company can save not only you and your family but it will save the world from companies like MONSANTO, WALMART etc… we need to start supporting companies with the same ethics as ourselves. please i urge you to to heed my words and jump on board. “in order for things to change we must all play a part”

    my contact info: baldribr@outlook.com

    Reply
  16. Jeremiah

    Arjun, There are certainly a lot of fact checking that needs to go into this article, and room for debate on some of these issues, but one line in particular caught my eye.

    “Roundup is in fact the most toxic of herbicides and insecticides used.”

    This isn’t just ‘slightly untrue’, I would rate that as “outrageously false”. Here’s a brief chart that shows a little bit of that:
    https://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/the-dose-makes-the-poison/

    There are waayyy more toxic herbicide and pesticides out there. Seeing a statement like that suggests that your knowledge of physiology might be skewed by the emotional nature of these issues. Perhaps we could work together to clear up misunderstandings regarding biology and physiology.

    Reply
    • - Collective Evolution

      The sources and scientific data showing the toxicity of roundup, and how industry regulators have lied with regards to its toxicity, and all of the studies that show just how poisonous it is…and all of the scientists who also believe that make me believe it is far from an “outrageously false” statement!

      I do not doubt that there are more toxic herbicides and pesticides out there, but they have not been examined by science as in depth as roundup has. Thanks for reading :)

      • Jeremiah

        It should be mentioned that all major farming uses herbicides, and glyphosate is the least toxic. Regarding the correlations this should be read http://www.tylervigen.com
        Without adequate training in physiology and statistics most people are easily manipulated into believing poorly conducted ‘scientific’ studies if the studies agree with their strongly held beliefs.

        Reply
  17. Finally CE you got it right – thank you! Now for the good bit: GMO’s to the rescue – when used PROPERLY and ethically (not by greedy bastards who want to screw people for money), GMO technology can make the world a much safer place by getting rid of the need to use chemicals! https://www.facebook.com/welovegv/photos/a.1381768752093176.1073741827.1380693538867364/1542739012662815/?type=1

    Reply
    • Laer Klat

      It will ALWAYS be used by some greedy bastards who want to screw people for money. Becuse if they don’t some other bastard will. Welcome to capitalism.

      Reply
  18. vertical farm will provide Wyoming residents with 100,000 lbs of fresh produce each year

    Read more: This vertical farm will provide Wyoming residents with 100,000 lbs of fresh produce each year | Inhabitat – Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building

    http://inhabitat.com/this-vertical-farm-will-provide-wyoming-residents-with-100000lbs-of-fresh-produce-each-year/

    Reply
  19. This article is so egregious! The CDC reports 1 in 68 Children in the U.S have autism. The idea it could rise that much – to 1 in 2 – in 10 years is ludicrous, and said by a reprehensible liar —

    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/autism-prevalence-unchanged-in-20-years/ (Search query: autism rates over 20 years [result #1]) – This shows it is not increasing. This site actually objected to the CDC numbers, citing lack of scientific methodology in adjusting variables to counter for improved screening methods, for instance. They report a stable 1/125 kids (no change since 1990) will have some form of it.

    Simply, the idea that it has more prevalence today because of pesticides or environmental factors is factually wrong, since it is not more prevalent by ANY factors, whatsoever, in scientific peer reviewed sources.

    Reply
    • Anotherhuman

      No offense but sciencebasedmedicine.org is a site that has a very clear and intentional bias on many levels, including being very pro-vaccination, pro monsanto, pro chemical living, and anti-environmental, just to name a few.

      If you honestly believe that autism rates are just being over-diagnosed or we just got better at diagnosis, then you honestly need to go spend some time with autistic children. The symptoms do vary, but they all share a common core of symptoms, which are not in any way mistakable for other conditions such as mental retardation (MR), CP, etc.. The REAL numbers are worse than even the CDC admits- they use tactics to shave data and take some diagnoses off the statistic because of clerical and other simple errors, like a mis-spelled word (teh instead of the, for instance). Most independent researchers had put the number at 1 in 50 well over a year ago. Makes you wonder what it really is today.

      Several independent researchers have suggested that 1 in 2 will eventually become a reality, but all can’t pinpoint the “when”, too many variables, but make approximations based on rates of acceleration.

      Sticking your head in the sand and claiming it’s all a lie won’t change the inevitable outcome.

      Reply
      • I never said anything about the varying degrees… It is scientific fact though that there is a spectrum and so there are significant amounts of high functioning autistic people too. Some people act like everyone diagnosed with autism struggles through life, and has their entire family giving up everything for them. When it’s really a much smaller percentage than half that have that kind of debilitation.

        My arguments were not of personal nature. I have discovered many cases of evidence online, refutations of her methods, that the Dr, who is the only one in the world stating 1 in 2 as a predictor, has been debunked by medical and scientific journals as a quack.

        You really ought to look into it for yourself. Why is she on the lecture tours saying all this, and not published in journals and being praised?

        I bet your only justification for no one else taking stock in her findings is its a giant conspiracy. Literally thousands of scientists can’t be believed as being honest, but this lone scientist practising outside of her specialty field has all the answers and is willing to be paid for speaking out. How nice of her

        Reply
  20. Anotherhuman

    It’s worth noting that as the parents of a severely autistic child, not once in 12 years has anyone ever contacted us or surveyed us as to what our diet, environment, or any other factors were a part of our lives during insemination and throughout the pregnancy or time thereafter leading up to the actual diagnosis.

    I’m not a doctor or scientist, but it would seem to me, that if I truly wanted to discover the cause of autism, I would search for causation through correlation. Certainly there has to be at least a handful of factors that all parents share, especially if the CDC claims of autism happening in the womb are true (which is very arguable), but wouldn’t “causation through correlation” answer that question too?

    It seems that the powers that be truly do not want either causation or correlation to be investigated. They prefer to look at the autistic children themselves, who have a whole range of variances due to extended physical, emotional, and environmental factors brought in after the fact- muddying the waters and creating a circumstance where the variables are now so infinite that no correlation is possible- leaving us parents to find answers ourselves through inter-discussion and comparison alone. Factor in the distraught parents, who will believe anything and fall prey to the staggering amount of propaganda out there (as well as the general public), and now you have conflicting information even from the parents themselves.

    How on earth does anyone think we will ever find a cause or cure this way? We won’t. We can’t.

    Monsanto, Big Pharma, the CDC, FDA, DHHS (who are future employees of these and other big business) have created a veil of sickness, just to sell us high priced health insurances, daily pills (to “manage” the sicknesses), among too many other things to mention in just one post.

    As always- follow the money.

    Reply
  21. Al

    Hahaha. This website is like the onion right?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Collective Evolution welcomes differing viewpoints and thought-provoking opinions that add value to the discussion, but comments may be moderated to remove profanity or remarks that detract from a healthy conversation. For the best interest of the community, please refrain from posting vulgar comments, profanity, or personal attacks. Comments submitted may automatically be flagged for review by our moderation team before appearing on the website.

Featured TEDx Talk

TEDx - Agents of Change

This Month’s Film:

Free Film Screening
advertisement - learn more

CETV - What's On

Published: Aug 23, 2015

Subscribe:
Connect, Inspire, Chat & Share!
advertisement - learn more
Amazers
The Mind Unleashed

Trending Now

consumerism

Disturbing Yet Amazing Images Expose The Sad Truth About Modern Culture (Graphic Images)

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and while the notion may be cliché at this point, it remains a universal truth, particularly in our current age of short attention spans and snack-sized wisdom. We want to know…