One of the first pieces of news to come out of the world of Exopolitics in 2015 comes from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). They recently released a report stating that half of all UFO sightings that took place in the 1950s and 60s were not unidentified flying objects (UFOs), but rather secret classified air craft technology, more specifically the U2 spy plane. On December 29th , they tweeted:
“Reports of unusual activity in the skies in the ’50s and 60s?’ It was us.” (source)
Along with the tweet they also released the report for public viewing, you can see the entire document here.
Is this statement another tool used to debunk the extraterrestrial hypothesis? It seems that way to many, given the fact that this was the CIA’s explanation:
“If a U2 was airborne in the vicinity of the airliner at the same time, its horizon from an altitude of 60,000 feet was considerably more distant, and, being so high in the sky, its silver wings would catch and reflect the rays of the sun and appear to the airliner pilot, 40,000 feet below, to be fiery objects.”
Pilots and military personnel have reported much more than simple “fiery objects.” Reports of strange objects are much more detailed than what the CIA is acknowledging. Perhaps this statement is something to think about:
“Behind the scenes, high ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense.” Former head of CIA, Roscoe Hillenkoetter, 1960 (source)
It was not long ago that the topic of UFOs was placed in the realm of ‘conspiracy theory,’ but today, the wave of sightings (and many strange ones) that have taken place for several decades have made it clear to many that it’s not a conspiracy, that unidentified objects are spotted on numerous occasions. As a result, various Defense agencies (like the CIA) have acknowledged and confirmed the phenomenon, as well as admitting to allocating resources to further study the phenomenon. For example, here is an example of files that were released in the UK that do just that.
Prior to the release of these documents from the CIA, rumors had been floating around that UFOs were nothing but classified military technology, or drone technology. This idea came after people stopped believe that UFOs were a conspiracy theory. Unlike the past, the question(s) is not whether UFOs are real or not, it’s what are they? Who is making them? How do they operate? This document released by the CIA suggests that most UFOs are indeed man made, which doesn’t seem to be entirely true given all of the evidence and witness testimony that suggests some of them are indeed extraterrestrial.
Extraterrestrial or Human?
As mentioned above, the question today is no longer “are UFOs real?” but rather, what are they, who is operating them and where do they come from? Skeptics of the extraterrestrial hypothesis often point to the idea that many UFOs are just military drones, or secret military aircraft like the U2 spy plane. Although it’s true (that many of them are human technology), a lot of evidence points to the fact that a significant chunk of UFO sightings could very well be intelligently controlled extraterrestrial space craft.
What type of evidence suggests that they could be extraterrestrial? For starters, these UFOs are not invisible, not only are they seen by civilians claiming to see something extraordinary, they are also tracked on radar and visually confirmed. Anything that violates sensitive airspace is a serious defense and national security issue, and as a result the military is involved. Jets have been sent out to identify objects of unknown origin that have been tracked on radar as well as visually confirmed. These objects have been seen to perform maneuvers that defy our known laws of physics, maneuvers that should not even be possible to perform. If there is suppression of man made UFOs, there is also a suppression of new science that renders our old laws obsolete. Imagine an object travelling at tremendous speeds, making no noise, stopping on a dime and going the opposite direction. Try explaining that one to a physics professor. Here is a great example of a Defense Intelligence Agency document describing one particular case in detail.
Here is another:
“Two pilots on a training mission, each flying an F5 fighter aircraft, tracked the object on their airborne radar. It gave a return equal to ten or more aircraft carriers-except this object was in the air, not floating on the water. Each pilot assumed his radar equipment was faulty, until he learned that the other pilot was also getting the same return. Not only this, but ground radar from a nearby airport also picked up the object and confirmed its huge size. The pilots also saw the object with their own eyes. One pilot later said that at a distance of twenty miles, it looked “like a plantain banana swathed in smoke.” The pilots were frightened, having no missiles or weapons. As they approached the massive object, which had been motionless all this while, it took off at an unimaginable speed. All at once, it vanished from the three radar screens.” (Huneeus, J, Antonio, “A Chilean Overview,” MUFON UFO Journal, 6/86; Huneeus, J. Antonio, “A Historical Survey of UFO Cases in Chilie,” MUFON 1987 International Symposium Proceedings (MUFON, 1987.))
To read more about what happens to a UFO when tracked on military radar click here.
Objects of varying shapes and sizes operating in ways in which no known air craft can operate is one reason why many support the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
Another reason comes from the countless amounts of people who have reported contact experiences with extraterrestrial beings. These people have been investigated (as illustrated by the UK documents linked earlier) by governments, scientists and academicians for a number of years. Many ‘experts’ seem to believe something genuine is going on, at the same time there are still many ‘experts’ who remain skeptical. The stories that come out of these experiences seem to be tremendous, and many people tend to share similar experiences.
Furthermore, the extraterrestrial hypothesis seems to be supported by a number of ‘prominent’ people who have held ‘important’ positions in the past. Here are some quotes that I’ve used in the past, I apologize if you’ve already seen them.
“There is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space, by other civilizations. Who they are, where they are from, and what they want should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation and not be the subject of ‘rubishing’ by tabloid newspapers.” (source) – Lord Admiral Hill-Norton, Former Chief of Defence Staff, 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy, Chairman of the NATO Military Committee
“Decades ago, visitors from other planets warned us about the direction we were heading and offered to help. Instead, some of us interpreted their visits as a threat, and decided to shoot first and ask questions after.” –Former Canadian Defense Minister, Paul Hellyer (source)
“An extraterrestrial influence is investigating our planet. Something is monitoring the planet and they are monitoring it very cautiously.” (source) – Former Sen. Mike Gravel (D-Alaska), and 2008 presidential candidate
Here is another great quote. These are just three quotes out of hundreds of shocking statements made from such people that support the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
What’s mentioned in this article is not even a fraction of the evidence that supports the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
The point I’m trying to make is that attributing all UFOs to classified military technology, drones, or something else that completely disregards the extraterrestrial is ignorant. The evidence is out there, and before drawing definitive conclusions based on belief systems it’s important to do some investigation.
For more articles on this topic from CE, please click here.
“Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.” – Unknown
This free online 9-part docuseries is going to change everything you think you know about diabetes and obesity.
The medical community isn’t telling you the whole truth about diabetes.
Learn what you can do to lose weight and avoid or heal diabetes.