As the parents and concerned citizens rallied in Sacramento to oppose Senate Bill 277, the Senate Health Committee advanced the bill with a 6 to 2 vote. In what the Sergeant at Arms described as “the biggest turnout [he’d] seen in 15 years,” the signed bill now faces further challenges on its way to becoming law. In California, where solutions always seem to involve the reduction of citizens’ rights – in tandem with the inflation of governmental control – hope for individual freedoms is getting hard to come by. While the state grapples with laughable solutions put forward by Gov. Jerry Brown to end a drought, parents now face the real possibility of forced vaccination for their children attending public school. During the hearing, many of the six senators who voted in favour of the bill used their time to voice pro-vaccine talking points. However, this was not before the Health Committee sat through almost two hours of testimony by parents and children wanting to state their opposition on record. Before the final vote, Committee Chair Senator Ed Hernandez (D) West Covina stated for the record “I believe in the science. I believe vaccines are safe and effective.” Not to be outdone, Senator Lois Wolk (D) Davis represented the collectivist immunity crowd by stating for the record, “Our individual rights aren’t without limits. You insisting on your right (to not vaccinate) could harm my child or grandchild.” For parents who still wish to live in California and maintain their freedom of medical choice, an amendment will be added for parents who decide to homeschool their children, allowing them to maintain their philosophical exemption.
The bill now will be heard by the Senate Education Committee, followed by the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Appropriations Committee. From there it faces the Assembly, before Gov. Jerry Brown decides to sign away parental rights to exemptions.
ABC & NBC: Integrity Sold
In what can only be considered planned coincidence, roughly one hour after the vote on SB-277 took place, NBC’s Law and Order SVU ran its new episode, titled “Granting Immunity.” To honor April as National Autism Awareness Month, the episode featured a measles outbreak in a California school which was caused by a “hippie dippy mom that never vaccinated her kids.” No stranger to taking the wrong side of controversy, it appears NBC is looking to follow in the footsteps of ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel in attacking parents who still want medical choice. Nestled between pharmaceutical advertisements from Flonase and Allegra, it was clear that this was behavior placement aimed at attacking thinking, pro-vaccine choice parents. Spoiler alert! After being called “Typhoid Trudy” and “Joan of Arc” (sarcastically), the pro-vaccine choice mother is convicted on second degree reckless endangerment. During her trial, the defense cites the Centers for Disease Control by saying that the side effects from the MMR vaccine are “statistically insignificant,” “mostly mild,” and “one in a million.” All of these statements are in serious question now that the CDC whistleblower, Dr. William H Thompson has released his statement admitting fraud regarding his work during official government MMR vaccine research and its link to increased autism.
Related CE Article: The Top 6 Reasons Some Parents Are Choosing Not To Vaccinate
What will never be mentioned in any television news debate, sitcom, or senate hearing are the warnings listed on the vaccine insert or the fact that vaccine manufacturers and doctors have government-granted immunity from any damages caused by the vaccines. You also won’t hear about things like the violation of the Nuremburg Codes, other countries halting the vaccines due to damages, what the toxic vaccine ingredients do to the human brain, or that there are no trials that have shown vaccine safety for children, adults, pregnant women. These questions pull back the curtain and lead to real debate and questions outside the appeal to emotion – television’s only tool in manipulating your opinions.
For the medical community watching debates or shows like Law and Order, it is important to look past your pharmaceutical-sponsored medical training. Doctors with major credibility have continually laid out the exact mechanisms of action and the entire neuropathology of vaccine adjuvant damage in children and adults. There is no longer an excuse to stay ignorant. They say that in the age of information, ignorance is a choice. However, as a practicing doctor or nurse actively injecting children and adults, your ignorance is a punishable crime under international law Nuremburg Principle IV:
“The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.” This principle could be paraphrased as follows: “It is not an acceptable excuse to say ‘I was just following my superior’s orders.’“
The Sacred Science follows eight people from around the world, with varying physical and psychological illnesses, as they embark on a one-month healing journey into the heart of the Amazon jungle.
You can watch this documentary film FREE for 10 days by clicking here.
"If “Survivor” was actually real and had stakes worth caring about, it would be what happens here, and “The Sacred Science” hopefully is merely one in a long line of exciting endeavors from this group." - Billy Okeefe, McClatchy Tribune