Can we still trust Julian Assange and Wikileaks? Prior to last year’s election, this question would have been unthinkable. When Wikileaks dumped a massive stockpile of emails exposing corruption within not only the Democratic National Party, but the rest of the government as well, it created quite the buzz. These leaks were extremely detrimental to the reputation of U.S. politics, and as a result, many more citizens became more aware of how corrupt it really is. Whether it was the exposure of Hillary’s connections to the big banks, going as far as them writing her speeches, or the election fraud and the DNC illegally ‘taking down’ Bernie Sanders, these revelations were quite shocking to say the least.
There were multiple leaks, even one that questioned whether or not Jon Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, was involved in an elite level political pedophile ring. This may sound completely preposterous, but the fact remains, pedophilia rings among the world’s elite are nothing new.
Does real transparency within politics even exist anymore? How can there be so much deception and misinformation? And why are some facts, even with plenty of evidence behind them, made out to seem ridiculous or “fake” by mainstream media?
Many of the leaks could not be denied, and in some cases, were even supported by those they exposed, including Clinton and Podesta, but some were so damaging that it forced a complete opposition towards Wikileaks.’ Never before have we seen such opposition toward Wikileaks in the more than a decade that they’ve been operating.
For those of you who don’t know, Wikileaks gets access to and publishes a number of classified documents from multiple countries and have been doing so for a long time. When documents were published regarding fraud within the DNC, the mainstream media and the entire political establishment instantly said, for the first time, that they were publishing “fake news.”
Other websites and journalists who presented this information, and embedded a link to these documents within their work, were also given the same label.
Things got so bad for the establishment and so much was being exposed that a strong campaign to censor information is now underway. Instead of letting people decide for themselves what is real and fake, we now have intelligence agencies, the U.S. government, and mainstream media corporations, along with Snopes, being charged with that task.
“The problem of fake news isn’t solved by hoping for a referee. But rather because we as participants — we as citizens, we as users of these services — help each other. We talk, and we share, and we point out what is fake, we point out what is true. The answer to bad speech is not censorship. The answer to bad speech is more speech. We have to spread the idea that critical thinking matters now more than ever.”
Mainstream Media Labelling Wikileaks as Fake News
So, why have the masses been encouraged to question the legitimacy of Wikileaks? Because, that’s what transparency does. Today, ‘national security’ has simply become an umbrella term used to justify keeping secrets. When Wikileaks made their revelations, it threatened the control structure and dominance that banks, big corporations, and corrupt politicians have on the populace. They were not going to just sit there and take it, were they?
There’s one very important thing we have to remember when discussing national security issues, and that’s the fact that the mainstream media is used by the government to sway the minds of the masses, and have them believe certain things. Stories and evidence are even manufactured to achieve this goal.
Where’s the proof? Well, it’s something we’ve covered in-depth multiple times in several heavily sourced articles. If you want to read more about that, you can check out these related CE articles:
Evolve Your Inbox & Stay Conscious Daily
Inspiration and all our best content, straight to your inbox.
We know for a fact that Wikileaks isn’t ‘fake news.’ It’s just that they’ve published some sensitive information, to the point where it threatens ‘national security’ and therefore, in the eyes of the elite, deserves some repercussions. Any opportunity the global elite have to slander the name of Wikileaks, or anything that threatens their plans for the world, will be taken.
It’s sad that we live in an age where mainstream media can say something without providing any evidence at all, and have such a large majority of people believe them. Even if the masses do not always believe what comes from their television screen, the power mainstream media has to even bring something into the discussion as a possibility is tremendous.
I like to use the Russian hacking as a prime example.
Nobody was expecting Hillary to lose the election and many people didn’t even believe it to be a possibility. Despite the fact that Trump is doing what she would have done, like bombing Syria, among other things, he has been portrayed in a much different light by the mainstream media.
This even comes after being an outsider, something that Hillary was not.
The recent questioning of Wikileaks’ credibility actually comes from Twitter. During last year’s elections, the WikiLeaks Twitter account sent a private direct message to Donald Trump Jr., the Republican nominee’s oldest son and campaign surrogate. “A PAC run anti-Trump site putintrump.org is about to launch,” WikiLeaks wrote. “The PAC is a recycled pro-Iraq war PAC. We have guessed the password. It is ‘putintrump.’ See ‘About’ for who is behind it. Any comments?” (The site, which has since become a joint project with Mother Jones, was founded by Rob Glaser, a tech entrepreneur, and was funded by Progress for USA Political Action Committee.)
The tweets have been published on Donald Junior’s account, and there doesn’t seem much to hide, but it does make it a lot easier to implicate Trump and Russia.
The next morning, about 12 hours later, Trump Jr. responded to WikiLeaks. “Off the record I don’t know who that is, but I’ll ask around,” he wrote on September 21, 2016. “Thanks.”
See what I mean when referring to Trump as an outsider to the political establishment by reading this related CE article:
The point is, it doesn’t matter who gets elected, the same agenda from year to year seems to continue, and the Deep State, which is comprised of various financial elite and the corporations they run, completely controls U.S. policy.
John F. Hylan was the Mayor of New York City from 1918-1925. He has been famously quoted as saying, “The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation . . . The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.”
So, Ask Yourself: Is It Wikileaks We Should Be Worried About?
Is it really Wikileaks we should be worried about, or is it the information the mainstream media keeps putting out? It’s important to question these things, especially given the connections that have surfaced between these networks, intelligence agencies, corporations, and governments.
Again, this information is detailed in the CIA/media document linked earlier in the article.
Are we at a point in human history where the truth and full transparency would collapse our current economic framework? Is a lot of the information we take in and hear a complete lie? And if so, is this why organizations like Wikileaks and people like Edward Snowden are demonized?
Your life path number can tell you A LOT about you.
With the ancient science of Numerology you can find out accurate and revealing information just from your name and birth date.
Get your free numerology reading and learn more about how you can use numerology in your life to find out more about your path and journey. Get Your free reading.