We are told that the United Nations (UN) is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security and international law. They promote themselves, and are outwardly promoted as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the UN at the forefront of all international conflict and instability, since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of all that I previously mentioned. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.
By promoting themselves, I am referring to the UN’s use of mainstream media networks, like CNN. CNN is owned by Time Warner (1), which is owned by JP Morgan Chase and Company and Dodge & Cox Inc, to name a few (2). It also has a select group of direct holders, like Jeffrey L. Bewkes. Mr. Bewkes sits in the head office of Time Warner’s two towers built in 2001 -buildings purposely built to resemble the once standing World Trade Centers of New York City. Bewkes is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (3),which is headed and funded by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families (4)(5). In fact a large majority of mainstream media network owners are all members of the CFR, as well as the trilateral commission. Another example of this is Richard D. Parsons. who served as Time Warner’s Chairman of the Board from May 2003 to January 2009. Currently Mr. Parsons is a member of the Board of Trustees and is a Senior Advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation(6). I could even go on to look at Frank J. Caufield, another major direct holder of Time Warner Corp, who is also a member of the CFR(7). Let me remind you again, that CNN is owned by Time Warner Corp, which is owned by a number of individuals and corporations that are run by a few families. These families hide behind the corporations they run, using the employees and politicians they hire to do their dirty work. Why we continue to hand our perception of what is happening on the planet to a select few who show no regard for the human race is beyond me. As a child, I did not understand how a human being could have such negative intentions, and create so much conflict through the use of trickery. To this day I still believe that a human being cannot do what these “governing bodies” and multinational corporations do. Whether or not it holds the same effect on you, I hope the connections above at least raise an eyebrow for you.
There is no need for me to point out the JP Morgan (major institutional holder of Time Warner)/ Rockefeller connections, which also played a big role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1912. So what does all this have to do with the United Nations? Well, the same ones that own all of our mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. If you dive in even further, all of the same corporations are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, like General Electric. You can find out more about free energy suppression here. More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.
League of Nations/Treaty of Versailles
The forerunner to the United Nations, was the league of Nations. It was created under the treaty of versailles in 1919 (8)(14). Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation(9). At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families(10). It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.
The Same Groups That Funded Nazi Germany Created The United Nations? Both Sides of the War Were Funded by the Same Group?
A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies of planet Earth? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting War time, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.
I’m talking about Paul M. Warburg, a German-born banker, who was an appointed member of the Federal Reserve System, on the board of governors(11). Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? He was heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, and his family was heavily involved with I.G Farben. I.G Farben was the largest chemical company in the world during its time, and one of the largest industrial booms next to the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, and General Motors. I.G Farben was responsible for numerous war crimes, supplying the Nazis with weapons and even funding the Nazi party(12)(13). Why would the federal reserve system and the Rockefeller’s be involved with I.G Farben? Isn’t the federal reserve an American entity? Did they not fund the United States as well? Paul Warburg and his family were involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Warburg family headed I.G Farben, a company that supported the Nazi movement. So what is going on here? There is a lot of evidence to show that both sides of World War II were funded by the same people, so I think a “fast one” has been pulled over our eyes. The Federal Reserve is still in tight with the Warburg family, as they have transformed themselves into several multinational corporations and financial institutions, like Warburg Pincus(15)(16).
It’s no secret that the Bush family also heavily profited from the war. Did you know that the Bush family also had members connected to the federal reserve, and that the Bush family is also very close to the Rockefeller family?(17). It’s not a secret that the presidency has always been connected to the Federal Reserve. Prescott Bush even worked for the Nazis, he worked with and profited from companies that were funding Hitler. With all of these connections, it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. So what makes you think it has stopped today? What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peace making body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the UN protect us against mining corporations for example, that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major mining corps, like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation(18). I’ve provided sources for all of my claims, at the same time I like to leave a few out to inspire the readers to do some research. Feel free to look into the Bush connections yourself! Keep in mind, I’ve used only a few examples and connections in this article, there is a tremendous amount that you can make on your own if you are sparked to further your research.
One aspect of the current consciousness shift is waking up to new facts and possibilities of what really happened in our recent human history. Many people take different paths to awakening, but in the end it all leads to one thing: we have to be the change we want to see. We’ve seen a lot of turmoil throughout the years on this planet, and in turn it’s created a very dense energetic state for planet Earth. More people are starting to find peace, they are experiencing more joy and desire change for all on planet Earth. Through awakening, we are changing the vibrational frequency of the planet. We’ve been blind to many things for thousands of years. We are living in the age of transparency, everything has presented itself for us to see from the “darkest” experiences to the “lightest”. Either way you look at it, everything that has and is playing out on planet Earth is all an experience for the human race. Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the federal reserve, the illuminati, extraterrestrials, spreading love, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people, and that truth is love. Love is required as a necessary building block for a new world. We are responsible for what is happening here, when we awaken from our sleep, I’m sure we won’t let continue what we’ve let continue for so long. No longer will we be used to uphold a system that does not resonate with us, instead we will create a new one that makes the old one obsolete.
There are multiple sources that go beyond mine, I could have used many more. Please feel free to do your own research to further verify some facts.
Is The Trump Administration Really Trying To Arrest Julian Assange?
- The Facts:
It has been revealed that the Department of Justice supposedly has a sealed indictment against Julian Assange. But the way in which this information has come to public attention is bizarre at best, and looks very much like a Deep State set-up.
- Reflect On:
Can we see operational patterns emerging from Deep State attempts through the Mainstream Media to control or at least obfuscate narratives that are not favorable to them?
The way it has been ‘revealed’ that the Department of Justice has secretly filed criminal charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange reads like the latest chapter in the Deep State playbook to control the narrative.
As I’ve said before, I don’t have insiders feeding me with intel, I am just going by intuition, reason, and experience. However, I feel that much of this becomes fairly obvious once the patterns that are used by the Deep State through the Mainstream Media to control the political narrative are deciphered. With your indulgence, please permit me to trace this latest ‘leak’ of information from its likely inception to its end purpose.
There Are No Coincidences
There is one thing about which I am fairly certain, and that is that there are no coincidences when it comes to what the Mainstream Media decides to report on. They will report on whatever will help advance the Deep State agenda, and they will not report on that which does not advance the Deep State agenda. Given that the Deep State controls Mainstream Media at the highest levels, this should come as no surprise.
However, their game is not as easy as it used to be. With the internet, citizen journalists and commentators, an awakening citizenry, and non-puppet Donald Trump at the helm, they are finding it more difficult to control the narrative. They no longer monopolize the airwaves and their reach is not as great as it once was. And now that a new counter-narrative, based in truth, is picking up steam, they are having difficulties wresting back people’s attention.
A big part of that counter-narrative, no longer dismissable by the mainstream as mere ‘conspiracy theory’, is that there is an unusually vast number of sealed indictments accumulating at the Justice Department, and the Trump Administration is set to unseal them and begin making mass arrests of Deep State actors guilty of crimes against humanity.
Naturally, the Deep State is trying to do everything it can to muddle or redirect this narrative. They pay clever and crafty people fabulous amounts of money to analyze the situation and come up with the next action plan. Of immediate importance is to dislodge the [Trump–>Unseal Indictments–>Prosecute Deep State] line of thought. It must have been close to the end of a frustrating, hair-pulling Deep State think tank brainstorming session that gave rise to the idea that could allow Mainstream Media to connect ‘sealed indictments’ favorably to Wikileaks, DOJ, Russian Collusion, and Mueller:
A: ‘Hey, why don’t we get people thinking that Trump has a sealed indictment against Julian Assange?’
B: ‘How are we supposed to do that without looking like idiots–like when we put those brand new stickers on Cesar Sayoc’s van?’
A: ‘Well, we could, uh, unseal an indictment for some two-bit child molester and…uh…replace Assange’s name after the first page, to kind of suggest that Assange has a sealed indictment against him just like this guy had.’
B: ‘So these pages with Assange’s name will supposedly just be there by ‘accident’?’
B: That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.’
A: ‘You got any better ideas?’
Deep State Goes Ahead With Plan
The Deep State has gone ahead with the plan. The more they thought about it, the more they thought they could use it to spin a narrative in their favor that not only involved Assange, but also Mueller, his own sealed indictments, and Russian collusion. This New York Times article awkwardly titled ‘Assange Is Secretly Charged in U.S., Prosecutors Mistakenly Reveal‘ is almost a step-by-step guide for building a Fake News narrative. Let’s take a look.
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has secretly filed criminal charges against the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, a person familiar with the case said, a drastic escalation of the government’s yearslong battle with him and his anti-secrecy group.
The infamous ‘person familiar with the case’ is once again pulled out of the hat to give instant credibility to the claim they want to be considered as fact. Isn’t the Times so lucky to have such willing informants on classified information in the Justice Department? Looks like a complete fabrication to me.
The charges came to light late Thursday through an unrelated court filing in which prosecutors inadvertently mentioned them.
“The court filing was made in error,” said Joshua Stueve, a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Virginia. “That was not the intended name for this filing.”
So they get one of their stooge spokesmen at one of the US Attorney’s offices to simply say “that was not the intended name for this filing…” and we are supposed to believe that it was just an ‘honest mistake,’ some kind of ‘clerical error,’ that an indictment against a sexual predator of children would somehow have gotten ‘mixed up’ with information from a sealed indictment against Julian Assange, as though we had the proverbial two lawyers bumping into one another in the hallway and dropping their papers, walking away with some of each other’s files? Or that somehow the author of the indictment meant to write ‘Seitu Sulayman Kokayi’ and wrote ‘Assange’ instead by mistake? Twice?
Mainly For The Headlines
But these kind of details are not so important for the Deep State. First, because they are really pressed for time to change the narrative. And secondly, even a lame, incredulous story behind the headlines is better than no story at all, because they believe that people only pay attention to the headlines. And to a certain extent, they are right. But for those people who actually read their articles, here is how their narrative is crafted:
The disclosure came as the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, is investigating links between President Trump’s associates and Russia’s 2016 election interference. WikiLeaks published thousands of emails that year from Democrats during the presidential race that were stolen by Russian intelligence officers. The hackings were a major part of Moscow’s campaign of disruption.
Wow, NYTimes, thanks for letting us know that Robert S. Mueller (the third, no less) is investigating President Trump’s associates and Russia’s 2016 election interference. In this very ‘official’ proclamation of information that the average American has probably heard through mainstream repetition ten thousand times (remember Joseph Goebbel’s ‘Big Lie’ technique?), a connection is made to Wikileaks, through the embarrassing Democrat emails that had first been stolen by Russians (UNPROVEN) and were ‘a major part of Moscow’s campaign of disruption’ (UNPROVEN).
The only FACT in this paragraph is the ‘official’ first sentence, and even then it references ‘Russia’s 2016 election interference’ as though this ‘interference’ was a proven fact, which it is not. If the other sentences were established facts, would there even be a reason for Mueller to be investigating? But no matter, the narrative building continues on, relentlessly, hoping to overwhelm the general public into submission.
Dumping The Desired Information
Now here’s a neat trick. While they are clear to explain that this filing was some kind of ‘error’–(‘A Justice Department spokesman declined to say on Thursday what led to the inadvertent disclosure.’)–they still take the opportunity to print all that was written about Assange in the document as though it was fact. Because they want people to think of it as fact.
While the filing started out referencing Mr. Kokayi, federal prosecutors abruptly switched on its second page to discussing the fact that someone named “Assange” had been secretly charged, and went on to make clear that this person was the subject of significant publicity, lived abroad and would need to be extradited — suggesting that prosecutors had inadvertently pasted text from a similar court filing into the wrong document and then filed it.
“Another procedure short of sealing will not adequately protect the needs of law enforcement at this time because, due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged,” prosecutors wrote.
They added, “The complaint, supporting affidavit, and arrest warrant, as well as this motion and the proposed order, would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and extradition in this matter.”
Leaked On Social Media
But how did this information come to light in the first place? It would look kind of silly if the New York Times had claimed to have just ‘found’ and been analyzing these kinds of documents. But of course, we turn to social media, where ‘Seamus Hughes, a terrorism expert at George Washington University who closely tracks court cases, uncovered the filing and posted it on Twitter:
You guys should read EDVA court filings more, cheaper than a Journal subscription pic.twitter.com/YULeeQphmd
— Seamus Hughes (@SeamusHughes) November 16, 2018
This is not to suggest that Hughes is necessarily in on the plot. Apparently he took the document from a screenshot from this Wall Street Journal article–which I can’t read because it’s behind a paywall and I don’t want to pay for it. I mean, I might have wanted to investigate how the WSJ got wind of this unsealed indictment, but I think you see what’s going on here.
Framing The Narrative
Much of the rest of the New York Times article tries to complete a nice mahogany frame around the narrative they are trying to create. First, they want us to believe the Justice Department today is fully in lock-step with the people that were running it during the Obama administration:
The Justice Department has been studying how to charge Mr. Assange or WikiLeaks with some kind of criminal offense since the site began publishing its trove of secret military and diplomatic documents.
Otherwise, the article tries to take a ‘serious, objective’ look at the implications of the prosecution of Julian Assange on the freedom of the press and the rights of ‘traditional news media organizations, like The New York Times’:
Members of the Obama legal policy team from that era have said that they did not want to establish a precedent that could chill investigative reporting about national security matters by treating it as a crime. Their dilemma came down to a question they found no clear answer to: Is there any legal difference between what WikiLeaks was doing, at least in that era, from what traditional news media organizations, like The New York Times, do in soliciting and publishing information they obtain that the government wants to keep secret?
Gag me with a spoon, as we used to say in the Valley Girl days.
Trump Loves Wikileaks
All this work to create a new narrative, to give new talking points to the tired Wikileaks-Russia-Mueller-Indictments confabulation is, like many other recent attempts of narrative-building, destined to fail. The main reason? It’s not founded in truth, and many people are now gaining greater discernment between true and false narratives at an exponential rate. Mainstream media would have us believe that information about a SEALED indictment on Julian Assange just happened to ‘pop out’ into the public through a series of wholly unlikely goof-ups, resulting in a whole new narrative built upon the ‘validity’ of a document that is recognized as ‘false’. Trump knows this document was fabricated for a specific purpose, and he knows the New York Times is just a tool of Deep State propaganda.
In the video below, simple truths are revealed about why Donald Trump would never be behind a sealed indictment against Julian Assange: he loves Wikileaks because it represents the truth, and it has revealed the truth about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. Furthermore, corruption in the Department of Justice was alluded to and Donald Trump is clearly disassociating himself from anything the Department of Justice was doing before he was elected.
Our discernment of ‘Fake News’ false narratives continues to grow, and the patterns of mainstream media deception are being laid bare for all to see. Let’s enjoy the show as the veils of deception dissolve before our eyes.
Celine Dion Launches ‘Illuminati-esque’ Gender Neutral Clothing Line
- The Facts:
Celine Dion teams up with Nununu to create a clothing line called Celinununu that produces gender neutral clothing for children.
- Reflect On:
Does this clothing line feel creepy to you? Whether it be the call for a 'New Order' or even the looks of the children in the images? Are we truly even our physical identity and appearance? Should we not be exploring the deeper parts of ourselves?
I was perusing through my Facebook newsfeed and came across what I initially thought was pretty crazy. Images of kids wearing odd-looking clothing with occult symbols and the words ‘NEW ORDER’ written across the chest. I thought it was some joke someone had put together to play on how there has been a long-standing goal of the elite/cabal to create a ‘new world order’ and what better way to start than babies and kids.
It all is shown in a new commercial where Celine Dion is breaking into a hospital baby ward to help bring her new clothing line to babies. The company Celinununu states in its mission: CELINUNUNU unites two forces by one voice: fashion has the power to shape people’s minds. Inspire your children to be free and find their own individuality through clothes.
The commercial for the product line is interesting on its own. She plays the ‘saviour’ of these babies, against police who are trying to stop her from telling these babies it’s OK to not select a gender. After she sneaks in, gets to the baby ward, she blows a magical dust onto the children, suddenly turning them all into gender-neutral babies wearing her clothing line. In cabal/occult terms, one might look at this as casting a spell on the children, something that fits deeply into the constant confusion the cabal is trying to cast on humanity.
One of the long-discussed plans of the elite/cabal has been to create a New World Order. Part of that order involves bringing everyone under one religion, one government, one military, and stopping things like procreation etc so as to have to control fewer people. This is why it’s so odd that the focus of this clothing line seems to push towards ‘New Order’ while talking about a highly controversial issue. Have a look at the images below for a deeper look into this line.
Here is the commercial.
Could This Be Something Else?
Another way to look at some of what is being said here is to look at the words “inspire your children to be free and find their own individuality through clothes.”
While this is an interesting concept, are we not telling them that their individuality is to identify as gender neutral? Or to wear these clothes so you don’t fall into one box or another? Does this not defeat the purpose of allowing a child to choose? I’ve always brought this up because it reminds me of people who follow a trend like wearing Uggz and then saying ‘I’m expressing my individuality through fashion” yet they are wearing the trendiest boot on the market. Is that individuality? Or capitalizing on a trend?
Then we can look at the occult aspect of this whole thing and the tie to the New World Order. Maybe they do stuff like this on purpose. Choose branding and designs that are so obviously occult that it will get people talking about it. Free publicity! She could later change the designs to something a lot less cabal/occult-ish, but then again, for the cabal, exposing their religion on the masses, and making it cool and acceptable has been their belief and goal all along. So it actually makes much more sense that they would be doing it in this fashion.
Using people in the industry they create and control to push their religion is not a new idea either. Below is an image of just a few examples. You can even see Celine Dion in the bottom right corner. Again, you have to look at this in the exact same way Christians wear crucifixes. This isn’t about some outlandish conspiracy, this is about a religion to them, and symbolism is very important to their beliefs. Many inside whistleblowers have corroborated this fact.
Discussion On Gender
Firstly, I do feel that man or woman, you are not defined by your sex or gender identity, and therefore I feel you should not have to be or do certain things simply because society has always stated that’s how men or women should be. Do women have to wear makeup every day? Do men have to do labor jobs? Do women have to play with Barbies while men play with GI Joe’s? No. If people allow themselves to pay attention to who they truly are, we will do what we feel most guided to do outside of expectation and so forth. But we also must be open as a society to not assume it’s bad to give a boy a GI Joe and a girl a Barbie.
People are doing what is classic in the modern human condition: we’re acting from extremes. When we view one side of the polarity, we tend to push to the other side and call it neutrality. A human is either male or female from a physical perspective, sure sometimes people have both parts and those are different cases. Beyond that, I understand people can sometimes feel that they are in the ‘wrong’ body per se, I personally do not know all of the reasons why this might be the case. I do feel it’s possible some people legitimately feel that way naturally, but I also feel many people who feel that way do for psychological reasons, in the same way many of us struggle with psychological challenges. It’s simply about how it shows up.
Before anyone loses it over that statement, I repeat, “I personally do not know all of the reasons why this might be the case. I do think it’s possible some people legitimately feel that way naturally.”
I feel that when looking at children, why is it OK to push schooling, religion and those sorts of ideas down their throats, yet we’re worried about buying someone the wrong toy or piece of clothing because it may harm their identity and individuality? Are we even our physical identity? You have the freedom to do whatever you wish. The problem is, people are confused, so they are trying to work through that confusion by blaming everyone else for why they are confused. Hence you have people getting upset about what pronoun a stranger addresses them by.
Does a child know how they want to dress and be when they are young? Whether they want to change their sex from a man to a woman or vice versa? What age do they figure that out? How much of the time is this a result of parents unconsciously forcing their new beliefs on their children?
In classic modern human consciousness, we are looking at all the things we are not, and trying to find ourselves. Our individuality comes from knowing ourselves beyond our mind and ego, and instead recognizes the unique energy, gifts, and intentions we come here to express. In my view, knowing that would produce a much healthier society versus one where we’re focused entirely on material and physical means. That isn’t who we are.
I do feel that in many of the extremes we are seeing today, we recognize where we operate from on a regular basis, and this allows us to see ourselves VERY clearly. By seeing so heavily how we identify with the physical, we can ask questions about what we are beyond the physical. This will allow us to dive more deeply in exploring who we truly are and ultimately this will pull immense power away from material and physical identifications and will instead awaken ourselves to an infinite love and confidence that already exists within ourselves.
While it’s easy to simply say this is all crazy stuff leading towards the end of society as we know it, it can also be a giant mirror that shows us what we are not. The next step is simply letting go of those old ideas.
Drone Footage Shows More Than 100 Whales Imprisoned In Underwater Jails
- The Facts:
Footage recently surfaced of more than 100 whales caught, trapped, and jailed, waiting to be sold in China for human entertainment purposes.
- Reflect On:
What right do we have to take living, breathing empathetic emotional beings trap them for our own desires? What type of environment are we growing up in that allows and caters to such behaviour? Are we living in harmony?
Recently, drone footage captured shots of over 100 whales trapped in secret underwater ‘jails.’ In total, 11 orcas and 90 beluga whales are illegally being held as captives in what activists are now calling a “whale jail.” It’s the largest number of marine animals to be held in such a way (that we know about), according to the Whale and Dolphin Conservation (WDC), a UK-based wildlife charity.
Apparently, they are being kept to be sold off to ocean theme parks in China, at a large price. Each whale is estimated to be worth millions, and China has more than 60 marine parks, as well as more than a dozen currently under construction. There is a huge market, one where a number of individuals are sacrificing their own humanity for a profit. This is where empathy needs to come in, we need to feel, think and perceive like another animal. Our lack of ability to empathize with all beings can disconnect us from reality.
It’s a fair question to ask, should we be allowed to capture animals at all? Even for scientific purposes? Should we be limiting our study to ways in which the animals can be observed and studied in their natural environment? If we need a body to examine, can we can take a deceased one? Perhaps we can find more humane ways of going about our study?
Think about how you would feel if you were taken from your family and held against your will? Forced into a life that in no way reflects anything natural. Would you be extremely scared, depressed, and suicidal?
Flouting The Law
While the operation of buying and selling cetaceans for entertainment is strictly illegal – they can only be captured for scientific and educational reasons – the international law banning the activity is routinely flouted. Just take the four companies responsible for these 101 jailed cetaceans, which between them exported 13 orcas to China between 2013 and 2016, an investigation led by local media and the investigative newspaper Novaya Gazeta found. Other companies reportedly utilize a loophole in the law that doesn’t explicitly forbid “renting” whales.”–IFL report
This isn’t the first time something like this has happened. In fact, it’s probably happening a lot, on a very large scale in places we have absolutely no idea about. Take for example, divers who discovered large sea creatures chained underwater and trapped inside of small cages. They were exploring the waters near the remote island of Kokoya, Indonesia and came across what you see in the images below. You can read more about this particular story here.
Shaped By The Environment
If you were an extraterrestrial conducting surveillance on our planet, what would you think? If it was me, I’d no doubt be extremely confused by observing so many wonderful people, spreading feelings of happiness, joy, love, compassion, understanding and a service to others type of mentality, while at the same time, also observing war, hate, fear, ego, greed, corruption, the destruction of our planet and a service to self mentality.
Human beings are so unique, and ultimately, I believe the best way to determine our true natural state is to look at it from birth. All organisms are inevitably shaped by their environment -this includes collective consciousness. Their biology, thoughts, feelings and perception of the world are informed by environmental factors. But at the moment a baby is born, it does not no hate or discriminate, nor is it violent: it is simply extremely curious. It’s in a state of joy, discovery, and it doesn’t hold any prejudices and usually has respect for all life. Hate only arises from teaching, brainwashing, false information and propaganda.
As we age, all of us are subjected to a massive brainwashing system, disguised as objective truth, and this system is responsible for influencing our decisions. We are taught competition and survival of the fittest, we are not taught cooperation, we are not taught how to deal with and understand our emotions, and we are not taught how to take care of life.
We are not taught empathy, despite the fact that we seem to be born with it. We are also forced into a lifestyle system, leaving little choice or knowledge about what it is we desire in our own heart of hearts. As much as we have joy and love on the planet, there is also the complete opposite, and aspects of our human experience that a growing number of people no longer desire to experience. One example is the torture, enslavement and even the consumption of animals.
Consumption No Longer Necessary
A lack of empathy is precisely why our planet is home to what could be one of the biggest continuing mass genocides in human history: the killing and consumption of living, sentient, emotional and extremely intelligent animals that share this planet with us.
Many believe, including myself, that there is no justification or reason to harm any animal on this planet. When it comes to this topic, I often think of the work done by Rita Laws, Ph.D., who has completed a great deal of research explaining the traditions of her own people, the Choctaw Indians of Mississippi and Oklahoma.
She explains how, from a spiritual perspective, animals were protectors of humanity by offering themselves as food, clothing, shelter etc. Even with this belief, indigenous people went about it in a humane way. Today, there would be absolutely no support for it. You can read more about her and watch one of her lectures in the article ‘A Native American Perspective on Veganism.’
Today, it’s a completely different story, no longer do we need animals for food and shelter. Today, animals are raised for slaughter in a process that involves torture, rape, separation of families, genetic modification, drug inoculation and more. It’s absolutely atrocious when we choose to face this aspect of ourselves. It’s a reality that not many people are even aware of. If you could see where your food comes from, you probably wouldn’t be able to eat it, and you most likely would not be able to produce it on your own.
Not only are billions of animals unnecessarily killed every single year in North America alone, but this type of activity is contributing to the destruction of our planet, mostly in the form of water consumption and deforestation. Beyond simple empathy and the thought/picture of another suffering, there are several other issues that involve animal rights…
Even more horrifying are the ways we use animals for our own entertainment. We have so much to learn from these beings, they are so much more intelligent and emotional than we often realize. All we ever see in popular Earth documentaries is a “survival of the fittest” mentality, that it’s a war-zone out there. We are rarely shown moments of animal altruism and even cross-species friendship. We are presented with a view of reality that’s completely false and one-sided. This occurs with animals as it does various other topics, like the “war on terror” for example.
Ultimately, they are no different from us and, in my opinion, are much more intelligent. I believe they are here as teachers.
I would ask everyone who reads this to place themselves in the situation of these ‘whales while knowing just how social and emotionally intelligent they are. How can another human being do something to another living being? And herein lies the problem. Wrongdoings that are happening within the human experience are actually experienced on many different levels, in many different forms. Often, that which we complain about is also done by ourselves in some other form, we simply fail to realize this. When it comes to ‘bad’ experiences on Earth, the key to change is within. By that I mean, the people involved in the trapping of these whales, for example, one, or all of them simply has to have a shift in consciousness, a moment of compassion, or some sort of experience that allows him to take on the emotions of those who they entrap(whales). This is why here at collective we say, change starts within, we are the ones we’ve been waiting for, and nobody is going to change this planet and take care of the animals unless those directly involved have a change of heart. We can help this by creating awareness and talking with those involved from a peaceful and reflective place. This is exactly what’s happening on the planet right now, and although it may not look like it, it’s getting better.
We must continue to speak up for those without a voice. The treatment of animals on this planet is one of the most central things we need to change, it’s one of the most powerful tools and experiences that these brave animal souls chose to take on, so we can change…Take comfort in knowing all of the animals who have suffered, and are suffering, are very special souls, on a very special mission.
Researcher Jailed After Uncovering Deadly Virus Delivered Through Human Vaccines
If you have been following stories in recent years of scientists and researchers who make discoveries that are threatening to...
Drone Footage Shows More Than 100 Whales Imprisoned In Underwater Jails
Recently, drone footage captured shots of over 100 whales trapped in secret underwater ‘jails.’ In total, 11 orcas and 90...