Connect with us

Awareness

Studies Link DNA Damage from Synthetic Antibiotics To Autism

Published

on

antibioticsBayer, the maker of the world’s most unsafe brands of birth control – the Yasmin line and the Mirena/Skyla IUDs, as well as a maker of neocontinid pesticides killing the bees – can now be held responsible for the rise in Autism rates over the last 30 years, as they are the makers and manufacturers of Cipro and Avelox, two of the world’s most popular fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which have recently been shown to alter DNA in ways that encourage expression of Autism related genes. Johnson & Johnson, the maker of Levaquin, also a popular fluoroquinolone antibiotic, can also be held responsible for the atrocity of one in eighty-eight children being autistic, as Levaquin is also a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that does the same thing.

advertisement - learn more

Cipro (ciprofloxacin) is a second generation fluoroquinolone patented in 1983 by Bayer, Levaquin (levofloxacin) is a third generation fluroquinolone patented in 1987 by Ortho-McNeil-Janssen (a division of Johnson & Johnson), and Avelox (moxifloxacin) is a fourth generation fluoroquinolone patented in 1991 by Bayer. In the 1980s the incidence of Autism was 1 per 1,000 children, today it is 1 per 88 children. The incidence of Autism has gone up hand in hand with the use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

Of course, this correlation between the introduction of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to the market and increasing rates of Autism, proves nothing. For proof, studies, experimentation and scientific exploration are needed. In September, 2013 the studies of topoisomerase inhibitors like fluoroquinolones as they relate to Autism commenced with an article in Nature entitled “Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism.”

Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics Lead to Autism Gene Expression

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are eukaryotic DNA gyrase (also known as topoisomerase II) and topoisomerase IV inhibitors. Topoisomerases “are integral to gene expression, as they resolve DNA supercoiling that is generated during transcription.” Here is a video describing what that means and how fluoroquinolones work –


advertisement - learn more

A 1999 study in Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis showed that fluoroquinolone antibiotics damage and destroy mitochondrial DNA. It makes sense that they would do so because mitochondria are the parts of our cells that are most closely related to bacteria.  Bacteria are destroyed by fluoroquinolone antibiotics through the unraveling of bacterial DNA and resulting apoptosis (programmed cell death). Sadly, mitochondria also suffer the same fate.

An article published in September, 2013 in Nature entitled “Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism” noted that topoisomerase inhibitors can adversely affect gene expression and, “topoisomerases facilitate the expression of a large number of ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) candidate genes, including many that are long and that are thought to have large effects on ASD pathology.” Basically, drugs that effect topoisomerases, chemotherapy drugs and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (which are chemotherapy drugs) can cause Autism genes to be expressed.

The article concludes by stating that:

“Our data suggest that chemicals or genetic mutations that impair topoisomerases, and possibly other components of the transcription elongation machinery that interface with topoisomerases, have the potential to profoundly affect the expression of long ASD candidate genes. Length-dependent impairment of gene transcription, particularly in neurons and during critical periods of brain development, may thus represent a unifying cause of pathology in in many individuals with ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders.”

THIS IS HUGE. It is an environmental factor, topoisomerase inhibiting chemotherapy drugs including fluoroquinolone antibiotics, that cause the expression of Autism genes.

It should be noted that the specific drug studied in “Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism” is Topotecan, not fluoroquinolones. Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor whereas fluoroquinolone atibiotics are topoisomerase II (also known as DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV inhibitors. Further studies need to be done to definitively show whether or not fluoroquinolones have the same adverse effects as Topotecan.

HOWEVER, the Researchers note that:

TOP2 (topoisomerase II) enzymes, (particularly TOP2B) also participate in gene transcription. We next tested whether genetic or pharmacological inhibition of TOP2 enzymes could reduce the expression of long genes. Indeed, with new experiments and by re-analyzing data from others, we found that the TOP2A/TOP2B inhibitor ICRF-193 reduced gene expression in a length-dependent manner in cultured mouse cortical neurons, embryonic stem (ES) cells and ES-cell-derived neurons. There was extensive overlap between genes affected by ICRF-193 and topotecan in cortical neurons, particularly for long genes, and the magnitudes of these effects were highly correlated. Thus, TOP1 (topoisomerase I) and TOP2 (topoisomerase II) enzymes regulate the expression of many of the same genes.

This means that topoisomerase II inhibitors, also known as DNA gyrase inhibitors, such as fluoroquinolones do the SAME THING as the topoisomerase I inhibitors studied. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics – Cipro, Levaquin, Avelox and a few more – “profoundly affect the expression of long ASD candidate genes.”

26.9 MILLION prescriptions for fluoroquinolone antibiotics were given to people in 2011 alone. Quantities of prescriptions of these DNA altering drugs have been in the millions since their rise in popularity in the 1980s.

These popular antibiotics, prescribed for sinus infections, urinary tract infections, strep throat, traveler’s diarrhea, prostate infections, etc. ALTER DNA AND NEGATIVELY INFLUENCE GENE EXPRESSION (EPI-GENETICS) AND LEAD TO THE EXPRESSION OF AUTISM GENES. Genes. DNA. Epi-genetics. The bits of information that our cells pass from one generation to the next. The damaged DNA is passed from parent to child and from that child down to their children, and so on and so on.

Gene expression, epi-genetics, is tricky because so many factors influence how genes are expressed, and it is only recently that ways of measuring and describing epi-genetics have been discovered. Neil deGrasse Tyson is probably better at explaining epi-genetics than I am, so please check out this video –

One of the research scientists who Dr. deGrasse Tyson interviews notes that, “you’re not only what you eat, (you are) potentially what your mother ate and even what your grandparents ate” to show the power of the heritability of epi-genetic markers. Dr. deGrasse Tyson and the research scientist are discussing how food can effect epi-genetic markers and influence obesity throughout generations of mice. If food can effect epi-genetics that dramatically, just imagine how dramatically a drug that is intentionally designed to interfere with and unravel mitochondrial DNA can effect human heredity. Not only can a drug that a parent (not just mothers, the DNA of fathers contributes to 50% of everyone’s genes) took influence the epi-genetics of their child, but the epi-genetics of their grandchildren and great-grandchildren can be adversely effected as well.

So, children are inheriting damaged genes, the genes that control whether or not a person is Autistic, because their parent (or even grandparent – for future generations – fluoroquinolones haven’t been around long enough to mess up multiple generations of people – yet) took an ANTIBIOTIC that messed up their mitochondrial DNA. This is absurd. Generations of humans will continue to be plagued by high autism rates, possibly indefinitely, because a certain class of antibiotics that has dangerous and severe side-effects even to those who take them directly, has damaged their mitochondrial DNA. This entire horrifying situation is Bayer’s and Johnson & Johnson’s fault and they should be held accountable to humanity in every way possible.

Let me just back-pedal a little bit and say that many women who have been severely adversely effected by fluoroquinolone antibiotics have had healthy, happy, beautiful, smart babies. Many factors go into how genes are expressed. What you eat, music, positive thoughts and words, etc. can influence how your genes are expressed. If you have taken a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, you are not doomed to have an autistic child. But it really seems shameful, horrifying actually, to increase someone’s odds of having an autistic child by encouraging the expression of autism related genes synthetically, through an unneeded and destructive antibiotic, when other, safer, non-DNA-damaging antibiotics are available.

If I can figure out that fluoroquinolones have the same effects as Topotecan, and that damaged DNA and gene expression / epi-genetics markers can be passed on from generation to generation, with my Cipro frazzled brain, you can bet that Dr. Zylka and his team of undoubtedly brilliant Scientists also realize that topoisomerase II / DNA gyrase (and topoisomerase IV) inhibitors like fluoroquinolones are leading to the expression of autism genes. I thank these Scientists for what they have uncovered and published from the bottom of my heart, and I beg of them, please have enough courage and moral fortitude to stand up for what you know to be true – that fluoroquinolone antibiotics made by Bayer and Johnson & Johnson have severely, and possibly irreversibly, damaged the human gene pool in a way that is causing children, innocent children, to be hurt. Though there is little that can be done to stop the damage from being passed down through the generations, the people who have already been hurt by Bayer and J&J deserve compensation. The children who are living with Autism deserve compensation. Bayer and J&J hurt them, they hurt humanity, and they should pay for their sins. Without the word of Scientists to back up these assertions, no justice will ever come to the families. Dr. Zylka and others… please, do what’s right.

The Dangers of Fluoroquinolones Shouldn’t be a Surprise

This coalmine is littered with dead canaries. The Scientists who designed fluoroquinolones always knew that they were topoisomerase inhibitors that unraveled bacterial DNA. They may not have known that fluoroquinolones caused the expression of Autism related genes, that’s a recent discovery, but any claims not to know that these drugs are dangerous involves a huge amount of willful ignorance. In 1998 Stephen Fried published Bitter Pills: Inside the Hazardous World of Legal Drugs, describing his wife Diane’s severe adverse reaction to Floxin (a fluoroquinolone that is no longer popular, but is still available) that included severe CNS issues. Before and since publication of Bitter Pills, article after article, research paper after research paper has been published noting one danger of fluoroquinolones after another. Here is just a small sample of the information about the immediate dangers of fluoroquinolone antibiotics – http://floxiehope.com/links-resources/. So many people have been needlessly hurt by these drugs. Many of those who have been hurt have been screaming about their pain, trying to get people to listen, trying to save others from their sad fate – and their warnings have been unheeded. It is to be determined whether or not this article in Nature will change anything, whether or not people will pay attention to the canaries in the coalmine. I hope so. Regardless of whether or not the harm that has been done to human DNA is reversible, people deserve to know the truth. They deserve to know why autism rates have gone from 1 in 1,000 children in 1980 to 1 in 88 children in 2013. They deserve to be compensated for their losses. They deserve to be able to make appropriate and informed decisions regarding the drugs they take and, sadly, the reproduction choices they make.

Nalidixic Acid, the foundation of all quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics was discovered in 1962 by George Lesher.  It took 51 years and indescribable damage to the human gene pool for the dangers of this DNA altering substance to be revealed.  May this be a lesson for all people intentionally altering the genes of humans, animals or plants.

Other Factors

Of course, there are some factors other than gene expression that contribute to Autism Spectrum Disorders. Sadly, many of those can also be explained by fluoroquinolone use. Direct application of fluoroquinolones (ear and eye drops that are fluoroquinolone based are commonly prescribed to children as young as 1 to treat their ear and eye infections, as opposed to the inherited exposure described above, has been shown to cause disruption of tubulin assembly, mitochondrial damage, and a cascade of interrelated brain and nervous system damage stemming from the ability of certain drugs and substances to inhibit deacetylation of histone.  All of these things have also been linked to Autism.

A Note About Vaccines

Studies have shown that, “certain individuals with a mild mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to mitochondrial specific toxins like the vaccine preservative thimerosal.”  Drugs that damage mitochondria, fluoroquinolones are not the only drugs that do so, combined with vaccines, can be toxic and can lead to a marked increase in oxidative stress, production of reactive oxygen species, cell death and possibly Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Adverse reactions to direct application of fluoroquinolones (again, as opposed to inherited exposure and direct application can come in the form of orally administered fluoroquinolones, ie pills, intravenously administered fluoroquinolones or topically administered fluoroquinolones, ie ear and eye drops) are often both delayed and triggered by exposure to another toxin. The 2008 lawsuit that got the Black Box Warning of tendon ruptures added to the warning label of orally and intravenously administered fluoroquinolones accepted drug reaction times of up to four months after the fluoroquinolone was taken as a reasonable time frame. Also, the warning labels for fluoroquinolones note that adverse reactions can occur several months after administration of the drug has stopped. Unfortunately, the evidence that I have for adverse reactions to fluoroquinolones being triggered by another toxin are anecdotal. However, I think that the anecdotes are illustrative. In my personal case, my adverse reaction to Cipro started a full two weeks after I had FINISHED taking the Cipro, when I started taking ibuprofen, a NSAID. Enough other people who are also suffering from fluoroquinolone toxicity also have reported adverse reactions to NSAIDs (and the warning label says, “Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (but not acetyl salicylic acid) in combination of very high doses of quinolones have been shown to provoke convulsions in pre-clinical studies.” http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/019537s082,020780s040lbl.pdf though I did not take NSAIDs in combination with the quinolone/fluoroquinolone nor have I suffered through convulsions – yet) for me to think that the ibuprofen triggered my severe adverse reaction. The CAUSE of my adverse reaction was the Cipro that I had taken two weeks earlier. The ibuprofen was simply the trigger. It would not have been dangerous on its own. However, since Cipro had started a cellular adverse reaction in my body, the ibuprofen became dangerous to me. (It should also be noted that my adverse reaction began when I started my period and that hormones may be related to fluoroquinolone toxicity as well – again, sorry for the anecdotally based assertion.) It should be explored whether or not vaccines can TRIGGER adverse reactions to other drugs – especially drugs that damage mitochondria. If this is the case, the earlier administered drugs are the cause of the problem and the vaccines are simply the trigger – but they’re not exactly innocent either. All of these assertions should be explored further than I have the resources or expertise to do.

Tragedy

As someone who has personally been severely adversely effected by a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, Cipro, which caused central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system problems as well as damage to the connective tissue throughout my body, I always suspected that the dangerous and tragic effects of fluoroquinolones were going to explode into common consciousness at some point. I hoped that it would blow up because of advocacy efforts and that it wouldn’t require a tragedy for the screams of the victims of fluoroquinolones to be noticed. I suspected that my hope was ill-founded though. I thought that a difficult to treat major infection would make its rounds and that everyone would take a fluoroquinolone – and that a large number of people would get sick so that it became undeniable what these drugs did. I imagined a scenario where a foreign leader got sick from a fluoroquinolone and had a fit over it – causing an international relations snafu. Though either of these scenarios would have involved a huge amount of sadness for the victims, they also would have involved some vindication and righteousness on my part over the fact that I KNEW and I tried to warn everyone. Not in my wildest dreams did I imagine that the tragedy caused by fluoroquinolones would be a slow-moving one and that it had been happening over my lifetime. Never would I have imagined that something as insidious and tragic as Autism was the tragedy caused by fluoroquinolones and that one in eighty-eight children would be effected. Never would I have imagined that our DNA would be so profoundly affected by these dangerous drugs that even if everything that I wished for – that their use be severely restricted and that victims of these drugs be compensated – came true, that the havoc that these drugs caused would not be stopped. I am profoundly and deeply saddened by this situation. I cannot express how much my soul aches over the fact that the victims of these drugs are children, the innocent among us, those who need our protection, the babies. They have been let down. Humanity has been let down and I cannot quit sobbing for all of our souls.

Read more from the author at www.floxiehope.com

Help Support Collective Evolution

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Awareness

The Power of Peppermint: 15 Health Benefits Revealed

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    This article was written by Sayer Ji, founder of Greenmedinfo.com where it was originally published. Posted here with permission.

  • Reflect On:

    A favourite herbal medicine of the ancients, peppermint leaves have been found in Egyptian pyramids dating back to 1,000 BC. Modern scientific investigations have now confirmed that this remarkable plant has over a dozen healing properties.

In our continuing effort to educate folks to the vast array of healing agents found in the natural world around us, we are excited to feature peppermint, a member of the aromatic mint family that you may already have squirreled away somewhere in your kitchen cupboard. While most have experienced peppermint as a flavoring agent, or perhaps as a comforting cup of herbal tea, few are aware of its wide range of experimentally confirmed therapeutic properties.

The ancients certainly were aware of the mint family’s medicinal value, having been used as herbal medicines in ancient Egypt, Greek and Rome thousands of years ago.[i]  Dried peppermint leaves have even been found in several Egyptian pyramids carbon dating back to 1,000 BC.

Today, modern scientific investigations are revealing an abundance of potential health benefits associated with the use of different components of the peppermint plant, including aromatherapeutic, topical and internal applications.

Most of the human research on peppermint performed thus far indicates this plant has great value in treating gastrointestinal disorders, including:

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome – Since the late 90’s it was discovered that enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules are safe and effective in the treatment of this increasingly prevalent disorder.[ii]  This beneficial effect extends to the pediatric community. In one children’s trial 75% of those receiving peppermint oil had reduced severity of pain associated with IBS within 2 weeks.[iii] Another 2005 trial in adults concluded that “Taking into account the currently available drug treatments for IBS Peppermint oil (1-2 capsules t.i.d. over 24 weeks) may be the drug of first choice in IBS patients with non-serious constipation or diarrhea to alleviate general symptoms and to improve quality of life.”[iv]  In another 2007 trial 75% of patients receiving peppermint oil saw an impressive 50% reduction of “total irritable bowel syndrome score.”[v] Most recently, a study published January of this year found that peppermint oil was effective in relieving abdominal pain in diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome.[vi]
  • Colonic spasm – Peppermint oil has been studied as a safe and effective alternative to the drug Buscopan for its ability to reduce spasms during barium enemas.[vii] [viii]
  • Gastric Emptying Disorders – Peppermint has been found to enhance gastric emptying, suggesting its potential use in a clinical setting for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.[ix]
  • Functional dyspepsia – A 2000 study published in the journal Ailment Pharmacology and Therapy found that 90 mg of peppermint oil and 50 mg of caraway oil resulted in 67% of patients reporting “much or very much improved” in their symptoms of functional dyspepsia. [x]
  • Infantile Colic: A 2013 study found that peppermint is at least as effective as the chemical simethicone in the treatment of infantile colic.[xi]

Click here to save your spot and get instant access to GreenMedInfo founder Sayer Ji’s interview! 

advertisement - learn more

Other studied applications include

  • Breastfeeding Associated Nipple Pain and Damage: A 2007 study found that peppermint water prevented nipple cracks and nipple pain in breastfeeding mothers.[xii]
  • Tuberculosis: A 2009 study found that inhaled essential oil of peppermint was able to rapidly regress tuberculous inflammation, leading the authors to conclude: “This procedure may be used to prevent recurrences and exacerbation of pulmonary tuberculosis.”[xiii]
  • Allergic rhinitis (hay fever): A 2001 preclinical study found that extracts of the leaves of peppermint  inhibit histamine release indicating it may be clinically effective in alleviating the nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis.[xiv]
  • Shingles Associated Pain (Post-Herpetic Neuralgia): A 2002 case study found that topical peppermint oil treatment resulted in a near immediate improvement of shingles associated neuropathic pain symptoms; the therapeutic effects persisted throughout the entire 2 months of follow-up treatment. [xv]
  • Memory problems: A 2006 study found that the simple aroma of peppermint enhances memory and increases alertness in human subjects.[xvi]
  • Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea: A 2013 study found that peppermint oil was found to be effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea, and at reduced cost versus standard drug-based treatment.[xvii]
  • Prostate Cancer: Preclinical research indicates that peppermint contains a compound known as menthol which inhibits prostate cancer growth.[xviii] [xix]
  • Radiation Damage: Preclinical research indicates peppermint protects against radiation-induced DNA damage and cell death.[xx]  [xxi]
  • Herpes Simplex  Virus Type 1: Peppermint has been found to have inhibitory activity against acyclovir-resistant Herpes Simplex virus type 1.[xxii] [xxiii]
  • Dental Caries/Bad Breath: Peppermint oil extract has been found to be superiorto the mouthwash chemical chlorhexidine inhibiting Streptococus mutans driven biofilm formation associated with dental caries.[xxiv] [xxv] This may explain why powdered peppermint leaves were used in the Middle Ages to combat halitosis and whiten teeth.

Peppermint is actually a hybridized cross between Water Mint (Mentha aquatica) and Spearmint (Mentha spicata),[xxvi] the latter of which has also been researched to possess remarkable therapeutic properties, such as the ability to exert significant anti-androgenic effects in polycystic ovarian syndrome[xxvii] and ameliorating the related condition of mild hirsutism, marked by excessive hair growth in females.[xxviii]

Like all plant medicines, extreme caution must be exercised when using extracts and especially essential oils.  Also, remember that more is not always better. A recent study on the use of rosemary in improving cognitive performance in the elderly found that a lower ‘culinary’ dose (750 mg) was not only more effective in improving cognition (as measured by memory speed) than a higher dose, but the highest dose (6,000 mg) had a significant memory impairing effect.[xxix] This illustrates quite nicely how less can be more, and why an occasional nightly cup of peppermint tea may be far superior as preventive strategy than taking large ‘heroic’ doses of an herb only after a serious health problem sets in.


Resources

  • [i] A. Sustrikova, I. Salamon, Essential oil of peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) from fields in Eastern Slovakia., 2004: Zahradnictvi Horticultural Science 31(1): 31-36
  • [xxvi] The Complete Illustrated Book of Herbs, Alex Frampton, The Reader’s Digest Association, 2009

Originally published: 2018-08-31

Articule updated: 2019-05-21


Help Support Collective Evolution

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Awareness

25 Reasons to Avoid the Gardasil Vaccine

Published

on

It has been 13 years since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) supplied fast-tracked approval for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine—promoted for the prevention of cervical cancer and other conditions attributed to four types of human papillomavirus (HPV). The agency initially licensed Gardasil solely for 9- to 26-year-old girls and women, but subsequent FDA decisions now enable Merck to market Gardasil’s successor—the nine-valent Gardasil 9 vaccine—to a much broader age range—9 to 45 years—and to both males and females.

As a result of Gardasil’s expanding markets not just in the U.S. but internationally, the blockbuster HPV vaccine has become Merck’s third highest-grossing product, bringing in annual global revenues of about $2.3 billion. However, Gardasil’s safety record has been nothing short of disastrous. Children’s Health Defense and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have just produced a video detailing the many problems with the development and safety of Gardasil. Please watch and share this video so that you and others may understand why Mr. Kennedy refers to Merck’s methodologies as “fraudulent flimflams.”

What follow are 25 key facts about Gardasil/Gardasil 9, including facts about the HPV vaccines’ clinical trials and adverse outcomes observed ever since Merck, public health officials and legislators aggressively foisted the vaccines on an unsuspecting public.

Inappropriate placebos and comparisons

  1. A placebo is supposed to be an inert substance that looks just like the drug being tested. But in the Gardasil clinical trials, Merck used a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant called AAHS instead of using an inert saline placebo.
  2. Among girls and women who received the vaccine and among girls and women who received AAHS, an astonishing 2.3% in both groups experienced conditions indicative of “systemic autoimmune disorders,” many shortly after receiving Gardasil.
  3. Multiple scientific studies associate aluminum not just with autoimmune diseases but with autism, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia and Parkinson’s disease as well as behavioral abnormalities in animals.
  4. Merck lied to study participants, falsely saying that the clinical trials were not safety studies, that the vaccine had already been found to be safe and that the “placebo” was an inert saline solution. [Source: The HPV Vaccine on Trial  (photo evidence, pp. 6 and 12).]
  5. When Merck conducted clinical trials for its next HPV vaccine formulation, Gardasil 9, it used Gardasil as the “placebo” in the control groups, again relying on the lack of an inert placebo to mask safety signals.
  6. The 500 micrograms of aluminum adjuvant (AAHS) in Gardasil 9 are more than double the amount of aluminum in Gardasil; this raises the question of whether Gardasil 9’s heavy reliance on the Gardasil trials for comparison is justifiable.
  7. The World Health Organization states that using a vaccine (rather than an inert substance) as a placebo creates a “methodological disadvantage” and also notes that it may be “difficult or impossible” to assess vaccine safety properly without a true placebo.

Inappropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria

  1. In the only Gardasil trial in the target age group (11- and 12-year-old girls) with a control group design, fewer than 1200 children received the vaccine and fewer than 600 served as controls. This single trial involving fewer than 1800 children set the stage for the vaccine’s subsequent marketing to millions of healthy preteens all over the world.
  2. The Gardasil clinical trials had numerous exclusion criteria. Not allowed to participate in the trials were people with: severe allergies; prior abnormal Pap test results; over four lifetime sex partners; a history of immunological disorders and other chronic illnesses; reactions to vaccine ingredients, including aluminum, yeast, and benzonase; or a history of drug or alcohol abuse—yet Merck now recommends Gardasil for all of these groups.

Inadequate monitoring

  1. Some of the study participants—but not all—were given “report cards” to record short-term reactions such as redness and itching. The report cards monitored reactions for a mere 14 days, however, and Merck did not follow up with participants who experienced serious adverse events such as systemic autoimmune or menstrual problems.
  2. Injured participants complained that Merck rebuffed their attempts to report adverse side effects. In numerous instances, Merck maintained that these “weren’t related to the vaccine.”
  3. Half (49.6%) of the clinical trial subjects who received Gardasil reported serious medical conditions within seven months. To avoid classifying these injuries as adverse events, Merck dismissed them as “new medical conditions.”
Annual deaths from cervical cancer in the U.S. are 2.3/100,000. The death rate in the Gardasil clinical trials was 85/100,000—or 37 times that of cervical cancer.

Cervical cancer risk-benefit ratio not worth it

  1. The median age of cervical cancer death is 58 years. Gardasil targets millions of healthy preadolescents and teens for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is practically zero. Interventions for healthy people must have a risk profile that is also practically zero.
  2. Annual deaths from cervical cancer in the U.S. are 2.3/100,000. The death rate in the Gardasil clinical trials was 85/100,000—or 37 times that of cervical cancer.
  3. With 76 million children vaccinated at an average cost of $420 for the three-shot Gardasil series, the cost of saving one American life from cervical cancer amounts to about $18.3 million dollars. By contrast, the value of a human life according to the Department of Health and Human Services’s (HHS’s) National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is $250,000—the maximum amount that the government program will award for a vaccine-related death.
  4. According to Gardasil’s package insert, women are 100 times more likely to suffer a severe event following vaccination with Gardasil than they are to get cervical cancer.
  5. The chances of getting an autoimmune disease from Gardasil, even if the vaccine works, are 1,000 times greater than the chances of being saved from a cervical cancer death.
  6. Women in Gardasil clinical trials with evidence of current HPV infection and previous exposure to HPV had a 44% increased risk of developing cervical lesions or cancer following vaccination.
  7. Women who get the Gardasil vaccine as preteens or teens are more likely to skip cervical cancer screening as adults, mistakenly assuming that HPV vaccination is a replacement for screening and that the vaccine will eliminate all risk.
Since Gardasil came on the U.S. market in 2006, people have reported over 450 deaths and over 61,000 serious medical conditions from HPV vaccines to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

Fertility effects

  1. Accumulating evidence points to Gardasil’s potentially severe adverse effects on fertility, including miscarriage and premature ovarian failure.
  2. Merck never tested the vaccine for fertility effects. However, Gardasil and Gardasil 9 clinical trials showed high spontaneous miscarriage rates of 25% and 27.4%, respectively—significantly higher than the background rates of approximately 10%-15% in this reproductive age group.
  3. Polysorbate 80 and sodium borate (Borax) are associated with infertility in animals. Both are Gardasil ingredients, and both were present in the one clinical trial protocol that professed to use a benign saline placebo.

Post-licensing

  1. In 2015, Denmark opened five new “HPV clinics” to treat children injured by Gardasil. Over 1300 cases flooded the clinics shortly after their opening.
  2. Since Gardasil came on the U.S. market in 2006, people have reported over 450 deaths and over 61,000 serious medical conditions from HPV vaccines to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
  3. Merck lied to VAERS about the case of Christina Tarsell’s death, falsely claiming that her doctor blamed a virus instead of Gardasil. [Source: The HPV Vaccine on Trial  (p. 144).]

The vaccine that should never have been licensed

As suggested in the conclusion to the 2018 book The HPV Vaccine on Trial, the rollout of Gardasil in 125 countries worldwide has illustrated—in an all-too-real and shocking manner—the phenomenon that prompted Hans Christian Andersen to write “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” Around the world, over 100,000 Gardasil-related adverse events have now been reported to the FDA and WHO, and accounts continue to multiply of “scandal, lawsuits, severe injuries, and deaths.” For almost 200 years, Andersen’s story has taught readers about the need to speak the truth, pay attention to evidence and listen to children. The rosy narrative manufactured for the dangerous Gardasil vaccine must not be allowed to hold sway any longer. It is time, in the words of the HPV Vaccine on Trial authors, to proclaim—loudly—that “the Emperor has no clothes.”

Help Support Collective Evolution

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Wikileaks: Ecuador is Being Run By “Criminals & Liars.” Assange’s Entire Legal Defense Given To The United States

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Three weeks before the U.S. deadline to file its final extradition request for Assange, Ecuadorian officials are travelling to London to allow U.S. prosecutors to help themselves to Assange's belongings.

  • Reflect On:

    How do the global elite have the right and power to do what they do to people like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden? Do we really live in a democracy when small groups of people in power can basically make decisions that go against the majority?

What’s happening with Julian Assange is heart-breaking. He’s a hero, just like Edward Snowden. Government secrets are kept, not to protect ‘national security’ as commonly claimed, but rather to protect political and corporate interests. After all, the United States is evidently run by a small group of corporations. These corporations have a huge influence when it comes to dictating government policy, and they do not like those who disclose their secrets. For years, Wikileaks has been leaking documents that’ve exposed major corruption within multiple governments, including the United States and basically the entire western military alliance. They’ve exposed that our world operates very differently than how it’s been presented, and they’ve never had to retract a single story. They exposed the invisible government, or “the real menace of Republic,” a term coined by John F. Hylan, former Mayor of New York City. Hylan has said that the “invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation.” He exposes the ones “who virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.”  (source)

Transparency is what Julian Assange is all about, and the American empire and even the global empire have been desperately trying to keep their secrets and prosecute anyone or anything that threatens their secrecy. That’s what this is all about. And they proved that with Chelsea Manning.

It’s not just people like Assange who are being demonized and hunted, it’s alternative media as well. The war on ‘fake news’ that’s been happening for the last little while has resulted in alternative media outlets being labeled as ‘fake’, even if they’re presenting credible information and sources. Any media outlet who even questions a controversial issue has been labeled as ‘wrong’ or ‘fake.’

What is happening to Assange is extremely unjust, and should serve as a massive ‘wake up’ call for anyone who isn’t already ‘awake.’ Truth and free press threaten the ability of the global elite to continue their cycle of creating problems and then proposing solutions in order to achieve their desired outcome. Some of the biggest leaks WikiLeaks has made were when they revealed the connections between terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda and ISIS to the western military alliance, and more specifically to the US government. Current presidential candidate and Congresswoman at the time, Tulsi Gabbard, even introduced a bill to stop this from happening.

We saw arms deals and the funding/support of terrorist organizations that the US claimed to be fighting against. This is a great example of how the global elite funds and creates a problem in order to justify a desired outcome (in this case it was heightened national security measures back home to protect people from ‘the war on terror’ and justify their infiltration of another country for ulterior motives).

I could go deeper into this, but the bottom line is that the arrest of Julian Assange comes at the hands of the criminals around the globe he was exposing, and it’s ironic that they are using their power and influence over mainstream media to portray Assange as the one who needs to be put behind bars.

advertisement - learn more

The Latest Update On Assange

Below is the latest update from the Wikileaks team via a recent press release.

Three weeks before the U.S. deadline to file its final extradition request for Assange, Ecuadorian officials are travelling to London to allow U.S. prosecutors to help themselves to Assange’s belongings.

Neither Julian Assange nor U.N. officials have been permitted to be present when Ecuadorian officials arrive to Ecuador’s embassy in London on Monday morning.

The chain of custody has already been broken. Assange’s lawyers will not be present at the illegal seizure of his property, which has been “requested by the authorities of the United States of America.”

The material includes two of his manuscripts as well as his legal papers, medical records and electronic equipment. The seizure of his belongings violates laws that protect medical and legal confidentiality and press protections.

The seizure is formally listed as “International Assistance in Criminal matters 376-2018-WTT requested by the authorities of the United States of America.” The reference number of the legal papers indicates that Ecuador’s formal cooperation with the United States was initiated in 2018.

Since the day of his arrest on April 11, 2019, Mr. Assange’s lawyers and the Australian consul made dozens of documented demands to the embassy of Ecuador for the release and return of his belongings, to which they received no response.

Earlier this week the UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy, who met with Mr. Assange in Belmarsh prison on April 25, asked to be present to monitor Ecuador’s seizure of Assange’s property. Ecuador inexplicably refused the request, despite the fact that since 2003, Ecuador has explicitly committed itself to granting unimpeded open invitations for UN special rapporteurs to investigate any aspect of their mandate in Ecuadorian jurisdiction.

The seizure and transfer of Mr. Assange’s property to the U.S. is the second phase of a bilateral cooperation that in January and February saw Ecuador arranging U.S. interrogations of past and present Ecuadorian diplomats posted to the embassy of Ecuador in London while Mr. Assange was receiving asylum. The questioning related to the U.S. grand jury investigation against Assange and WikiLeaks. As part of phase one of the cooperation, the United States also asked Ecuador to provide documents and audiovisual material of Assange and his guests, which had been gathered during an extensive spy operation against Assange inside the embassy.

On Friday, President Lenin Moreno initiated a state of emergency that suspends the rights of prisoners to “inviolability of correspondence, freedom of association and assembly and freedom of information” through Executive Decree 741.

Kristinn Hrafnsson, Editor-in-Chief of WikiLeaks said:

“On Monday Ecuador will perform a puppet show at the Embassy of Ecuador in London for their masters in Washington, just in time to expand their extradition case before the U.K. deadline on 14 June. The Trump Administration is inducing its allies to behave like it’s the Wild West.”

Hrafnsson continued:

“Ecuador is run by criminals and liars. There is no doubt in my mind that Ecuador, either independently or at the behest of the US, has tampered with the belongings it will send to the United States.”

Baltasar Garzon, international legal coordinator for the defence of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, said:

“It is extremely worrying that Ecuador has proceeded with the search and seizure of property, documents, information and other material belonging to the defence of Julian Assange, which Ecuador arbitrarily confiscated, so that these can be handed over to the agent of political persecution against him, the United States. It is an unprecedented attack on the rights of the defence, freedom of expression and access to information exposing massive human rights abuses and corruption. We call on international protection institutions to intervene to put a stop to this persecution.”

Lawyer for Mr. Assange, Aitor Martinez, whose confidential legal papers were photographed with a mobile phone by embassy workers as part of a spy operation against Mr. Assange in October 2018, said:

“Ecuador is committing a flagrant violation of the most basic norms of the institution of asylum by handing over all the asylee’s personal belongings indiscriminately to the country that he was being protected from–the United States. This is completely unprecedented in the history of asylum. The protecting country cannot cooperate with the agent of persecution against the person to whom it was providing protection.

Ecuador has now also refused a request by the UN Special Rapporteur on Privacy, Joe Cannataci, to  monitor and  inspect the cooperation measure. Ecuador’s refusal to cooperate with the UN Special Rapporteur defies the entire international human rights protection system of the United Nations. Ecuador will from now on be seen as a country that operates outside of the system of safeguards of rights that defines democratic countries.”

Ecuadorian defence attorney for Mr. Assange, Carlos Poveda, said:

“In the face of countless abuses, and acting on provisions in domestic legislation and international human rights instruments, the defence has challenged the execution of this measure. All applications have been rejected. While the prosecution office proclaims its commitment to human rights protections, there has been no transparency and the investigation is conducted in secret. Without justification, and absent of all legal criteria, the measure shows the interest in obtaining information that the United States can use to proceed with its flagrant persecution. Meanwhile Ecuador has hinted that it too intends to proceed with investigations. Meanwhile, to date our criminal complaints of espionage against Julian Assange remain unprocessed, despite the gravity of the facts reported.”

Help Support Collective Evolution

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod

UPDATE: YouTube has demonetized our channel for no apparent reason.

For as little as $3 a month, you can contribute to helping CE thrive! Thanks for being on our Hero's Team. We appreciate you and your support deeply! 

Thanks, you're keeping conscious media alive.