Connect with us

Alternative News

Major Scientific Journal Requests Retraction Of Anti-GMO Cancer Study

Published

on

-In November 2012, The Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology published a paper titled ‘Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize’ by Gilles-Eric Seralini and his team of researchers at France’s Caen University. (1) It was a very significant study, which obviously looks bad for the big bio tech companies like Monsanto, being the first and only long term study under controlled conditions examining the possible effects of a diet of GMO maize treated with Monsanto roundup herbicide. The Journal has recently requested that professor Seralini retract his study, and the professor has denied to do so, stating that there was no fraud and the scientific research within the study is totally legitimate.

advertisement - learn more

After completion of the research, the work went through a rigorous review process and was approved for publication after a four month review process by scientists and researchers regarding methodology and more. Seralini and his researchers tested more than 200 rats who were given a diet of GMO corn over a period of two years at a cost of 3 million Euros.

--> FREE Documentary Series: "Exhausted" explores how you can regain, restore and replenish the endless energy you thought you had lost forever. Click here to save your spot!

Due to the displeasure of the bio tech industry, the study received worldwide attention as pictures with rats and their tumors showed up everywhere. I would like to mention that we do not support animal testing, and feel it to be completely unnecessary. We already have a large amount of information and plenty of evidence that supports the fact that GMOs can possibly pose a threat to human health and Earth’s environment, we don’t need to harm animals anymore (and never did) to see that.

Before we go into further detail, I wanted to make it clear that despite this retraction request by the this journal, there have been other studies linking GMOs as well as roundup herbicide to multiple health ailments. Just because one study is retracted does not mean we should ignore it or the multitude of other studies out there that prove GMOs should be a no go. I think it’s also important to note that the journal has ties with Monsanto, which will be elaborated on later in the article.

For example, a study conducted by the Environmental Toxicology Program at the Chulabhorn Graduate  Institute in Bangkok, Thailand showed Roundup herbicide, also known as glyphosate,  to be a potential endocrine disruptor. Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that can interfere with the hormone system in mammals. These disruptors can cause developmental disorders, birth defects and cancer tumors. The study found that glyphosate induces human breast cancer cells via estrogen receptors.(2)

Glyphosate exerted proliferative effects only in human hormone-dependent breast cancer. We found that glyphosate exhibited a weaker estrogenic activity than estradiol. Furthermore, this study demonstrated the additive estrogenic effects of glyphosate and genisein which implied that the use of glyphosate-contaminated soybean products as dietary supplements may pose a risk of breast cancer because of their potential additive estrogenicity(2)

advertisement - learn more

Furthermore, A group of scientists put together a comprehensive review of existing data that shows how European regulators have known that Monsanto’s glyphosate causes a number of birth malformations since at least 2002. Regulators misled the public about glyphosate’s safety, and in Germany the Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety told the European Commission that there was no evidence to suggest that glyphosate causes birth defects.(3)(4)

Another study done by Earth Open Sources, which is an organization that uses open source collaboration to advance sustainable food production. put together a comprehensive review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature documenting the serious health hazards posed by glyphosate.  The report was headed by Dr M. Antoniou, Head Gene Expression and Therapy Group, from the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics at King’s College London School of Medicine, UK. Dr. Antoniou was joined by 6 other doctors who have a similar biography.(3)

Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the current approval of glyphosate and Roundup is deeply flawed and unreliable. In this report, we examine the industry studies and regulatory documents that led to the approval of glyphosate. We show that industry and regulators knew as long ago as the 1980s and 1990s that glyphosate causes malformation – but that this information was not made public. We demonstrate how EU regulators reasoned their way from clear evidence of glyphosate’s teratogenicity in industry’s own studies to a conclusion that minimized these findings in the EU Commission’s final review report (3)

It doesn’t stop there, studies have linked Glyphosate to Alzheimer and Parkinson’s disease, as well as Autism.  When you ingest Glyphosate, you are in essence altering the chemistry of your body. It’s completely unnatural and the body doesn’t resonate with it. P450 (CYP) is the gene pathway disrupted when the body takes in Glyphosate.(3)(5) P450 creates enzymes that assist with the formation of molecules in cells, as well as breaking them down. CYP enzymes are abundant and have many important functions. They are responsible for detoxifying xenobiotics from the body, things like the various chemicals found in pesticides, drugs and carcinogens. Glyphosate inhibits the CYP enzymes. The CYP pathway is critical for normal, natural functioning of multiple biological systems within our bodies. Because humans that’ve been exposed to glyphosate have a drop in amino acid tryptophan levels, they do not have the necessary active signalling of the neurotransmitter serotonin, which is associated with weight gain, depression and Alzheimer’s disease.(5)

 For any paper to be published in a journal such as this one, it must go through a rigorous approval process. I wanted to make it clear that there are hundreds of studies that outline the potential harm of GMOs as well as the herbicides that go with them, by presenting just a few of them. Just because the journal is trying to retract this one, does not mean there is no legitimacy behind the fact that GMOs are dangerous and it’s clear that most people around the world want nothing to do with them. That’s why we are seeing such a global opposition against GMOs, and that’s why they are banned in the majority of countries around the world.

It’s also important to note that Professor Seralini has refused to retract his GMO tumor study (as mentioned in the title). Again, rigid criteria exist for a serious scientific journal to accept a peer-reviewed paper and to publish it. There also exists strict criteria by which such an article can be withdrawn after publication. He suggested that rats fed over a lifetime with GM maize NK603, tolerant to the herbicide Roundup and manufactured by the US company Monsanto, developed more tumors and diseases. I think it’s also important to mention that the associate editor of the journal is Richard E. Goodman, a former Monsanto scientist and supporter, as well as an affiliate of the  GMO funded industry group.(0)(7)(9)

No fraud or manipulation of data

It’s also important to mention that there was no fraud or manipulation of data. The reason for retraction is because  “the results are inconclusive and therefore do not reach the threshold needed for publication” and “there is a legitimate reason for concern about both the number of animals tested in each group and the particular strain of rat selected,” he explains in a letter to the researcher at the University of Caen which Science and the Future has seen.(6)

Seralini has responded in saying that the retraction request of the journal is illicit, unscientific and unethical. The grounds for retracting a published paper are:

  • Clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to misconduct (eg data fabrication) or honest error
  • Plagiarism or redundant publication
  • Unethical research

There was nothing to suggest or show that Seralini’s research was as above, his work does not even meet any of this criteria and the chief editor of the journal even admits as much. In his letter informing Prof Séralini of his decision, Hayes concedes that an examination of Prof Séralini’s raw data showed “no evidence of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data” and nothing “incorrect” about the data.(7) Hayes states that the retraction is solely based on the “inconclusive” nature of the findings on tumours and mortality, given the relatively low number of rats used and the choice of rat strain, which Hayes says naturally has a “high incidence of tumours”.Crucially, however, inconclusiveness of findings is not a valid ground for retraction. Numerous published scientific papers contain inconclusive findings, which are often mixed in with findings that can be presented with more certainty. It is for future researchers to build on the findings and refine scientific understanding of any uncertainties.

 Inconclusiveness of findings is not a valid ground for retraction. Numerous published scientific papers contain inconclusive findings, which are often mixed in with findings that can be presented with more certainty. It is for future researchers to build on the findings and refine scientific understanding of any uncertainties. (8) – Clair Robinson of GM Watch

The criticisms of the low number of rats and choice of rat strain have been addressed by Prof Séralini’s team in a comprehensive response to critics that was published in FCT, as well as by independent scientists writing in support of the study.

There is a large contraversy surrounding this story, perhaps an attempt to ridicule a very significant anti-GMO study? Maybe,

Monsanto and the related GMO industry immediately went on a war footing to control the potentially fatal damage from the Seralini study. Suddenly, with worldwide attention to the new Seralini results, the EU Commission and its EFSA was under fire as never in their history. How they reacted was worthy of a bad copy of an Agatha Christie murder novel. They piously announced that they had passed the Seralini study on to their EFSA scientific panel for evaluation.(7)

It’s not just alternative media outlets speaking up against GMOs. Geneticist David Suzuki recently expressed his opinion that human beings “are part of a massive experiment,” and he was referring to GMOs. Dr. Thierry Vrain, a former Canadian Government scientist has also been spreading the word, among many others.

Sources:

(0) http://www.hesiglobal.org/files/public/Committees/PATC/Meetings/2012%20Prague/SpeakerBiosPATC_Sym2012.pdf

(1) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512005637

(2) (2) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23756170

(3) http://earthopensource.org/files/pdfs/Roundup-and-birth-defects/RoundupandBirthDefectsv5.pdf

(4) http://earthopensource.org/files/pdfs/Roundup-and-birth-defects/Antoniou-Teratogenic-Effects-of-Glyphosate-Based-Herbicides.pdf

(5) http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416

(6)http://rt.com/op-edge/monsanto-gmo-studies-reports-588/

(7)http://gmoseralini.org/journal-retraction-of-seralini-study-is-illicit-unscientific-and-unethical/

(8)http://www.independentsciencenews.org/science-media/the-goodman-affair-monsanto-targets-the-heart-of-science/

(9)http://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology/editorial-board/richard-goodman/#contact

http://sustainablepulse.com/2013/11/28/seralini-refuses-retract-gm-maize-tumor-study/#.Up_yMsRDsoG

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/02/gmo-study-seralini-retracted_n_4357450.html

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

“The CIA Simulated UFO Abductions In Latin America As Psychological Warfare Experiments” – Dr. Jacques Vallée

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    In his book, "Forbidden Science 4," Dr. Jacques Valle explains how he came in possession documents showing that forced "UFO abductions" were conducted by the CIA as psychological warfare experiments.

  • Reflect On:

    What type of technology would the CIA have to have in order to pull something like this off?

The picture you see above is of Joseph Allen Hynek, American astronomer, professor, and ufologist. Hynek acted as scientific advisor to UFO studies undertaken by the U.S. Air Force under three consecutive projects: Project Sign (1947–1949), Project Grudge (1949–1952), and Project Blue Book (1952–1969). The man standing next to him is Dr. Jacques Vallee, more on him below.

Throughout history, the field of ufology and the examination of the extraterrestrial hypothesis has, without a doubt, been overcome with a plethora of disinformation. Those who have dived into the depths of ufology know this best, as it’s well documented that ‘outsiders’ from intelligence agencies and governments have infiltrated the field for the purposes of deceiving researchers and people who are interested in the topic for one simple reason, to keep them away from the truth. On top of these disinformation campaigns, which still seem to be in operation today, there has long been an “official campaign of ridicule and secrecy” (Roscoe Hillenkoetter, Ex CIA director)  associated with the subject. This is why I encourage all those reading who dive into this subject to stick with facts, data, and evidence rather than entertain what seem to be outlandish claims that in no way, at all, can be verified.

I’d like to draw your attention to Dr. Jacques Vallee, who holds a master’s degree in astrophysics and a Ph.D. in computer science. The subject of UFOs first attracted his attention as an astronomer in Paris. He subsequently became a close associate of Project Blue Book’s J. Allen Hynek and has written several books on the UFO enigma. He is currently a venture capitalist living in San Francisco. Vallée co-developed the first computerized map of Mars for NASA in 1963. He later worked on the network information center for the ARPANET, a precursor to the modern Internet, as a staff engineer of SRI International’s Augmentation Research Center under Douglas Engelbart.

He’s a researcher that’s had a very interesting life, to say the least, with regards to researching the topic of UFOs. He’s come into contact with and had meetings with most experts in the field, politicians from around the world, high ranking military personnel and much more. His journey into the subject has led him to investigate an uncountable amount of case reports regarding UFOs and supposed extraterrestrial beings, and he’s been a major player with regards to bringing the mainstream scientific community forward to look at the evidence and data that’s involved with such a serious subject, that, in his time, was largely ridiculed. He is an important reason why the phenomenon has gained as much credibility as it has today.

Valle is one of many who have written about and documented the startling evidence that well-constructed hoaxes and media manipulations have misled UFO researchers, diverting them from the UFO phenomenon itself, what’s really going on.

In one of his latest books, Forbidden Science 4he shares a record of his private study into unexplained phenomena between 1990 and the end of the millennium, during which he was traveling around the global pursuing his professional work as a high-technology investor. It’s a bit of a diary, documenting his experiences and encounters/meetings as he tries to examine and explore the phenomenon.

In an entry dated Thursday 26 March 1992, Valle writes:

I have secured a document confirming that the CIA simulated UFO abductions in Latin America (Brazil and Argentina) as psychological warfare experiments.

Reading this line from his book triggered me back to earlier in his book when he mentions one of many conversations he’s had with Ron Blackburn.

On Monday 16 April 1990, he writes:

Over lunch again with Colonel Ron Blackburn (Air Force) at the Gatehouse in Palo Alto he revealed that the “Secret Onion” group started in 1985 in the classified tank located in his basement at the Lockheed Skunk Works. Colonel John Alexander had brought him a list of the people in the inner circle. They divided the world into layers of concentric trust and ability. John introduced Blackburn to Ed Dames. Blackburn and I have a firmed up our plants to ravel to New Mexico on May 4th, up the high mesa – supposedly to meet some Aliens.

It’s interesting to note that Colonel John Alexander army writes about Blackburn in his book, “UFOs, myths, conspiracies and realities.”

Among the people I met was Dr. Ron Blackburn, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel who was then working at the Lockheed Skunk Works in Burbank. It was Blackburn who first asked me if I had ever heard of the infamous Area 51. In the early 1980s, this facility was still not widely known inside the military, let alone the general public, even though it had been functional for decades…Among areas of common interest between Blackburn and me were UFOs. We discussed many possibilities related to who might be in charge of UFO research. We both thought that there was some organization, probably within the U.S. Air Force, which had the responsibility. But we acknowledged that whoever had the ball, there must be a an interagency effort as well. Our assumption was that somebody must be in charge, and we were well aware of all the prevailing stories and rumours. Roswell, we assumed, was a real UFO event.

Fast forward to Friday, May 4th, 1990, Valle writes about Blackburn:

“I’m convinced the government is working on UFOs,” he told me. “What are the chances some witnesses are being fooled by special effects developed by psychological warfare?” I countered. Thinking of cases like Bentwaters in the UK or Cergy-Pontoise in France. “They’re pretty good,” he admitted. “Suppose you shine a week infrared laser into people’s eyes; it won’t hurt them but may induce a hallucinatory state. Experiments have been done where you send a microwave beam through someone’s brain; you pick up the transmitted energy pattern. You can influence people this way, even make them hear things. Holograms have been used too,”

It’s interesting to note the conversation Valle had with Blackburn in 1990, and then in 1992 writes that he had received a document that the CIA had been involved with staging UFO (alien abductions). Combine this information with Blackburn mentioning that holograms have been used, and technology exists to produce “hallucinatory” states.

This is just one of many examples and pieces of evidence many researchers in the field point to suggesting that there are staged abductions happening for reasons unknown, and that it’s continuing today.  It’s not surprising either if you’ve ventured down the road of CIA mind controlled tactics, programs like MK ultra and their desire to manipulate the perception of the masses with regards to various topics. It’s not surprising if you’ve looked into the black budget world, a world that’s far more advanced that the mainstream world with regards to technology.

Dr. David Jacobs, a retired university professor, is one of many experts who has hypnotically regressed people who claim to have had ET abduction experiences. After thousands of people, they all share the same story. Many filled with forced impregnation, and ‘hybrid’ children, among other things. Could many of these forced abduction experiments simply be deep black projects that are being conducted by rogue government agencies? Now we know that yes, many of them could be. Are all of them? There are stories floating around out there without much evidence, like the idea that Eisenhower made a deal with certain extraterrestrial groups, that they could abduct a certain amount of humans for the exchange of technology. Based on the idea that that forced abductions may be military operations, this supposed meeting is called into question.

Valle writes of Jacobs in his book:

I am trying to read Jacob’s Secret Life.’ The author appears obsessed with what he views as a massive Alien invasion, his analysis is no longer balanced.

This may explain why there is a whole array of people who claim to have had experience with beings from somewhere else, but these experiences did not involve forced abductions, but rather, simple contact experiences. Remember, the key nuance here is we’re talking about human and ET contact, vs forced abductions which are often quite aggressive or terrifying for people.

I’ve written previously about the work of Jacobs, you can read that article here. I’ve been in this field for more than a decade now and the more I learn, the more I have to unlearn and consider other possibilities. I wrote that article being aware that many abduction cases could be military operations, but I did not mention it. I’ve come across the work of many who have interviewed abductees and, from their experiences, there also seems to be a military component as well, or a feeling of military personnel appearing as ‘Aliens.’

How Deep Does The Misinformation Go?

Richard Doty is also mentioned multiple times in Valle’s book. He is a retired Air Force Special investigations officer (AFSIO), and his job was to spread disinformation about the UFO subject during his time with the Air Force. Spreading disinformation about the reality of UFOs is no secret, and in Doty’s case, he admitted to infiltrating UFO circles along with his colleagues to feed ufologists and journalists lies and half truths so that they would never understand any real truth.

So, as you can see, this type of narrative has many interesting sources. You can read more about Doty and watch an interview with him here.

Regardless, There Is Something Going On Here

Valle, and all others in this field are quite aware that something real is going on, and something quite possibility extraterrestrial and inter-dimensional. This article is not meant to shed doubt on the phenomenon itself as well as the extraterrestrial hypothesis. Credible information with regards to sightings, crash retrieval, and possible bodies and contact experiences with ‘aliens’ are out there and can be examined. That being said, there is obviously a lot of disinformation out there as well, ridiculous claims as well as charlatans who are in the field spreading lies and fake stories for the purposes of making money, or perhaps to do what Doty was once tasked with, to spread disinformation, are out there.

With all that being said, the fact remains that:

There is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space, from other civilizations….This should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation and not the subject of ‘rubishing’ by tabloid newspapers. – Lord Admiral Hill-Norton, Former Chief of Defence Staff, 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy, Chairman of the NATO Military Committee (source)

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading

Alternative News

A Video of President Trump Supporting Bill & Melinda Gates’ Vaccine Alliance, Gavi

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Donald Trump/U.S. Government have donated more than a billion dollars to Bill & Melinda Gates' vaccine alliance, called Gavi.

  • Reflect On:

    Why do people still think this is fake news even though it came straight from President Donald Trump? Why do people think one person, like Trump can "save" humanity? Why do we keep giving our power away to other people and expect them to make change?

Politics is a funny thing, if there’s one common theme that can constantly be seen, it’s the fact that throughout the years, presidents and politicians are constantly flip flopping when it comes to their opinion on various topics that are controlled by political policy,  or should I say corporate policy instead? Why do they (presidents and politicians) flip flop so much? Is it because they’ve been entrapped or black mailed in some sort of way? Perhaps threatened in some sort of way to take a particular stance on a particular topic? Are decisions and opinions given simply to appeal to the masses and collect the popular vote? With such a large lack of transparency existing within big politics, why do we even continue to vote and uphold a system that doesn’t seem to be capable of helping our planet, people and all life on it thrive? Why are there so many solutions to our problems that have trouble seeing the light of day? These are important questions to ask ourselves, especially in today’s day and age.

What Happened: Today, Trump has completely reversed his position on some issues, like vaccines, for example. Is this a result of the influence that the “secret government” (Roosevelt) has over the presidency? Who really knows. During his 2016 campaign Trump was quite outspoken about vaccine safety concerns, but since then he has publicly stated how important they are, and he recently gave more than a billion dollars to a vaccine alliance called Gavi that was co-founded by Bill & Melinda Gates. He also inked a deal with Pfizer for 100,000,000 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine while simultaneously stating that “big pharma” doesn’t like him for lowering drugs prices.

I wrote about this and published an article about it a couple of weeks ago titled  “Trump Gives 1.16 Billion to Bill Gates’ Vaccine alLIANCE & Inks deal with Pfizer of a COVID Vaccine.” As a result, we received a lot of comments on Facebook stating that it’s “fake news” or to simply “trust the plan.” The number of comments on the article claiming that it was “fake news” was quite overwhelming, and most of them obviously Trump supporters.

I am writing this article to let these people know, again, that this isn’t ‘fake news.’ US President Donald Trump “donated more to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases worldwide.” He did so in a statement of support for Gavi at the public Gavi pledge conference, which was hosted by the United Kingdom, on June 4th. So far, the United States has donated more than $12 billion for the development of COVID-19 vaccines and therapies, and “the U.S. commitment to immunization complements the work of innovators in the United States and other countries who are racing to find a vaccine and treatments for COVID­19.” (source)

Here’s a video clip of Trump talking about his decision, as the headline of this article promotes. Clearly, this isn’t fake news. 

Shortly after this, Trump announced that they will give nearly $2 billion to Pfizer, a big pharmaceutical company, for 100 million doses of a COVID-19 vaccine that could make its way into the public domain sometime next year.

It really goes to show you how many people simply read headlines without actually reading the article and examining sources for themselves.

Sure, Trump may be playing both sides. He has promoted alternative treatments like Hydroxychloroquine, which was supported by countless doctors, scientists and evidence. He has called the coronavirus pandemic “artificially induced” and more, which many of us in the ‘alternative media’ world would agree with for a number of reasons. But again, he is also simultaneously supporting the vaccine.

Are politicians forced to do and say things they really don’t agree with? Why? What’s going on ?

Has science become politicized?

Why This Is Important: If we write an article about how Trump has been the only president to make any real progress on human and child sex trafficking, we get demonized for being “Trump supporters” which we are not. If we write an article that raises concerns, like the topic discussed in this article, we get demonized for not being a Trump haters” , which we are not.

This is what happens when you look at and write about politics from a neutral perspective without taking sides. The idea that one man or woman in the position of the presidency can make changes our world needs is upsetting to me, because we are constantly giving our power away every four years thinking someone else is going to “take care of the problem.” We look to these people as idols and saviours of humanity, when really we are simply prolonging problems that plague our world by putting power into the hands of people who don’t always have the best interests of humanity at heart, all the time.

The fact that so many people claimed that Trumps donation was “fake news” goes to show just how many people don’t read articles and examine sources. This makes it easy for “fact checkers” and provides more of a justification for governments to censor real information and label it as fake news. Simply reading a headline and then jumping to a conclusion is a huge problem people have today, especially when it comes to information that contradicts ones belief system.

Big politics is a big game, and those who play it have to go up against those who sit above government, a power so great that dozens of presidents and politicians have mentioned it, and most of them in recent history have given in to the will of those who sit above the presidency. Donald Trump, in my opinion, is a difficult person for this group of people, which is why he has been bombarded and demonized by the mainstream media and his opposition with false accusations, like the “Russian hack” for example. All these and more have been an attempt to get the president out of his current position.

As New York City mayor John F. Hylan once said“like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation.” This “little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties … [and] control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country.

Again, this doesn’t mean that he is the “solution” or represents the type of change we need. Ultimately, a shift in consciousness is required and humanity needs to begin creating and making decisions from a place of peace and good will, and an elevated level of thinking.

The Takeaway: Everytime I examine big politics, I am amazed as to why humanity continues to play with it and participate in it, thus perpetuating it. Why are we made to feel like our vote actually counts and that one person (president) can make any significant change on the planet? Presidents prior to Trump have been used as celebrity figures. They are marketed and portrayed as idols and bearers of good will, and in many cases a distraction. We are made to believe that our ‘leaders’ are solving and tackling the issues that need to be tackled, but are they? Nothing significant ever seems to get accomplished.  If we can lock down the world and take action for the coronavirus, why can’t we lock down the world and take action for more important things?

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Ex Defense Official Appears On CNN Stating “UFOs Are Clearly Under Intelligent Control”

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Ex-Defense official Christopher Mellon has been making his rounds on mainstream media networks talking about the reality of the UFO phenomenon.

  • Reflect On:

    Can we expect truth from mainstream media when we've already experienced so many examples of deception? Where are they going with this topic? What do they want to use it for?

What Happened: Christopher Mellon was the former Deputy Assistant Defense Secretary for Intelligence from 1997 to 2002. From 2002-2004 he was the Minority Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under Sen. John Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.). He’s had a long career inside the government and the intelligence community, and is considered one of hundreds, if not thousands of ‘high ranking’ individuals that have, and are speaking up about the UFO phenomenon and have been for decades.

Mellon recently made appearances on both Fox News and CNN, and in the CNN interview, he states the following:

We have information from multiple radar systems, inferred systems, multiple Naval personnel on the ground and in the air. And we’re tracking these objects performing maneuvers that clearly indicate they’re under intelligent control. They’re responding to our air-craft, they’re out-maneuvering them, and they’re doing things that are far beyond any capability we posses.

Recent related CE Article: Government Contractor Briefs The D.O.D On “Off-World Vehicles Not Made On This Earth”

Keep in mind we are talking about objects that have been observed instantaneously accelerating at thousands of miles per hours, and then re-appearing in another location. In of the incidents mentioned below, the objects were also seen shape shifting, and it is arguable if one of them actually teleports.

In the Fox News interview, Mellon states:

These are interactions between intelligently controlled vehicles that are highly sophisticated operating in and around U.S. military facilities, and hence the concern…There is a vital national security issue, which is that our sovereignty is being violated by vehicles of unknown origin.

Mellon has published multiple articles in mainstream media outlets, and has given several video interviews after an organization that he’s now a part of, To The Stars Academy, gained access to videos of UFOs filmed by multiple Navy pilots. These videos were recently confirmed as authentic by the Pentagon, and are one of thousands of examples of objects performing maneuvers that no known air-craft is capable of, objects being tracked on air/ground radar while simultaneously visually confirmed by trained military observers.

Why This Is Important: Why does something have to be presented on CNN or another mainstream media network for it to be verified or real? Collective Evolution, for example, has been creating awareness on this phenomenon for 11 years with impeccable sources that cannot be discredited, yet when mainstream media covers it, it’s all of a sudden a big story. This is dangerous, and uncomfortable because it’s one of many examples of how mainstream media has a stranglehold on the minds of the masses.

How come a select group of people get to speak out and receive all of the attention? Why are they getting all of the mainstream media press coverage? Are they themselves being handed mis-information from their ‘higher ups?’ Who knows, one thing is for certain, this field has been plagued with disinformation for a very long time.

It’s also important to note that this topic is deep, and has huge implications with regards to science, history, technology, consciousness and much more. Mainstream media does not discuss this, and they also seem to not really emphasize the technological capability of these craft and what that in itself means.

There are so many examples of mainstream media networks dishing out fake information, the war on terror is a great example in my opinion. There was a massive campaign to convince the population that terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS were a huge threat that were carrying out terrorist attacks, when most of the evidence I looked at suggested that these terrorist groups are actually a creation of, funded by, trained by, and armed by rouge parts of the U.S. government and their military allies. This means that the ones who create the problem, propose the solution under the guise of good will, all of ulterior motives like resources extraction, and perhaps the retrieval of crafts that do not originate on Earth. Nations are and always have been desperate to retrieve and reverse engineer this technology.

A concern of many individuals is if the ‘establishment’ will attempt to do the same with UFOs, just as they’ve attempted to do the same with virtually ever major topic and geopolitical issue.

In the Fox News interview, when Mellon states that “There is a vital national security issue, which is that our sovereignty is being violated by vehicles of unknown origin” I am concerned for multiple reasons. One is because “national security” has been a term used to justify the classification and concealment of information from the citizenry. It’s also been used to justify the concealment of information that exposes and unethical and immoral side of governments and big corporations, which is precisely why people like Julian Assange are in jail.

The Takeaway

At the end of the day, our world today seems to be about which powerful person, group or ‘deep state’ can control the perception of human beings the best, and win their admiration.

The truth is indeed out there, but it’s for us as a collective to discover for ourselves, not something for our government to tell us. We’re getting to the point where information is being heavily censored, and there seems to be a ‘ministry of truth’ (fact checkers) patrolling the internet telling us what is and what isn’t. Again, I suspect this to happen with the UFO phenomenon.

I do feel that we are the ones we need to be concerned about, and there is much work to do on our planet with regards to solving issues that continue to destroy our ability to thrive, along with other life-forms as well. We are destroying our own planet, and perhaps this, in some way, with regards to some groups who are observing us. I’m just speculating, but it’s intelligent speculation based on years of research. That being said, I don’t know.

It’s an extremely deep topic that leaves no aspect of humanity untouched. There are many stories within the lore, from ancient indigenous tales of “star people”  to friendly encounters, to both benevolent and what we perceive as malevolent encounters and more.

We’ve been writing on this topic for 11 years, and if you’re interested in going through our UFO/ET article archive, you can do so here.

Due to censorship, we’ve also created our own platform, CETV, and there you can find even more in depth content on the phenomenon, and others as well.

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!