Connect with us

Discover

Is Consciousness The Next Big Thing? A Review Of The Wisdom 2.0 Summit

Published

on

This past weekend in San Francisco some of the world’s greatest thinkers, visionaries and technologists gathered at the Wisdom 2.0 summit. CE writer Tom Bunzel was able to attend the entire weekend in person and shares some of the incredible moments and experiences that luminaries such as Eckhart Tolle, Karen May and Jon Kabat-Zinn helped to create.

advertisement - learn more

audienceI was blown away when I arrived at the conference center at the Marriott Marquis; over 2000 attendees had come to this sold out Wisdom 2.0 Summit to see luminaries like Eckhart Tolle, Arianna Huffington and John Kabat Zinn along with their counterparts in many high tech companies.

At first I was struck by the parallels between this event and the many trade shows and conferences I had attended as a tech writer –everyone seemed to have an “agenda” whether they were handling a booth, speaking, or in the audience. There were so many coaches, advisers, gurus, guides and so on building a practice that it seemed as though Mindfulness was just the latest product or service that might support our economy –like sustainable energy, technology, mass transport or fossil fuels…

But it didn’t take long to realize that there were many different levels at work here, and that while there is certainly an economic dimension to such a conference (imagine the costs involved alone), and there was the undercurrent of positivity and “feeling and doing good,” even deeper was an awareness that something very special was going on a much larger scale.

At every turn the deeper question was asked:  What is it that Life/Awareness wants me to do?

Soren Gordhamer, founder and host of the Wisdom 2.0 Conference, and the author of Wisdom 2.0, (one of the first books to explore living with mindfulness and wisdom within the context of our modern technology age) set the tone during his brief welcoming address. He recounted the early days of his conference when there were just several hundred people who could barely explain their “reasons” for attendance at the conference, and at a much smaller venue.  Later in the conference, when he introduced Eckhart Tolle, Soren also revealed much about his personal journey, that involved dropping many of the roles (husband, tech executive, etc.) that he had come to see as his identity. These are the sorts of questions that are only beginning to surface in corporate America –where “change management” and “listening skills” are still mainly seen as “strategies.”

advertisement - learn more

Therefore, as Arianna Huffington said in her presentation (“Thrive:  The Third Metric: Redefining Success Beyond Money & Power” –upcoming book by same title), “we have reached critical mass.”  A discussion of consciousness or wisdom is not just for quiet corners of cocktail parties away from the “realists,” but it is now also prevalent in the board rooms of major corporations. Aside from her new book, Arianna is also offering her own series of conferences, and a mindfulness app – GPS for the Soul – she says,

“what we need is a great course-correcting mechanism — a GPS for the Soul — because otherwise the consequences can be serious, in terms of our health, our relationships, our jobs, and even our country.”

To be sure to a certain extent it is still seen as another means of encouraging engagement and fostering productivity but especially among the younger exponents, many of whom scurried around this conference, a deep and abiding acceptance of circumstances as they are, rather than how they “should” be was eminently manifest. This was nowhere more evident than when a few conference volunteers turned out to be disguised protesters and took over the stage shouting “San Francisco, not for sale,” disrupting the Google presentation.

protest

Protestors briefly taking over the main stage.

When the stage was cleared by another Wisdom 2.0 volunteer and a hotel union A/V guy, Bill Duanesenior of the three Google executives who were interrupted, put his teaching into practice and manifest great calm and indeed wisdom, suggesting everyone absorb the situation as it was, and feel whatever reactions it may have triggered within. He asked for a period of silence and reflection. Then he acknowledged the sincerity of the protesters in their own right and expressed compassion for the fervency of their beliefs and dedication. He referred to the presentation on the previous day made by the President of Rwanda, concerning the hardships of his country and the injustices and genocide that are part of human existence. And he asked for everyone to consider their own relationship to conflict and how they “show up” in periods of stress.

This was done in an atmosphere of grace and calm that eloquently modeled (in its silence) the notions of compassion, openness and sincerity that his group is bringing to Google.Duane garnered rousing applause from the audience of over 2000, each of whom had his or her own inner reaction to the unusual situation both validated and acknowledged without judgment, pontification or a sense of duality of “us” and “them.”

These values were first eloquently presented in the very first tech talk, “My Wisdom 2.0 Experience: Putting This Into Practice,” from Arturo Bejar, Director of Engineering, Facebook.  He echoed many of the corporate presenters who said that when first confronted by these “revolutionary” concepts he thought they were bunk, but now he is a firm proponent of integrating three main components into all aspects of his organization and indeed his software:

  • Compassion
  • Being heard
  • Intentionality

A similar tone was struck in a powerful presentation entitled “The Rise of Meditation in Tech Community: One Man’s Journey from Seeing it as Bullshit to a Daily Practice,” by Le Web Cofounder, Loic Le Meur. He made the important point that it is not surprising that this movement has emerged so strongly in the field of technology where the “same people who created tech seem to now require ‘space’ and indeed the more we get connected the more we need meditation.” Le Meur admitted that for some in the high tech field there is still a stigma and a sense of shame for being “New Age” but that the obvious benefits of a mindfulness practices, as he himself has experienced them, are self evident. He also eloquently described how with practice he can “see myself getting angry” and retreat to “a space in my mind which I can access any time.”

Another amazing presenter was a personal favorite — Jon Kabat-Zinn, Mindfulness Teacher, author of numerous books, including two best-sellers: Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain and Illness, and Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life. I was first exposed to Zinn as a subject in Bill Moyers’ book, Healing and the Mind and have found several of his online videos, including a session at Google, extremely helpful in my own meditation practice. He suggested that at this time it is dharma teachers who are truly changing the world—a world that is very confused and Zinn asked, “so who knows that you’re confused?” In Zinn’s practice, a point of attention is on witnessing your breath, and he echoed Eckhart Tolle when he said that if you were responsible for breathing you’d be dead. This suggests that a mindfulness practice connects intimately with a higher intelligence that “instructs” your entire body; Zinn suggested that the miracle of the various systems at work in the human liver is far more impressive than anything achieved by human science.

The essence of Zinn’s teaching may be that there is “space” for all aspects of our being within consciousness – “awareness can hold everything” – and when we make room for every part of our experience we recognize that we are already whole, and that at bottom there is nothing to attain. When he made the comment, “Meditation it’s not what you think” he suggested that mindfulness gently gets us beyond our “monkey” mind of compulsive thinking, and in touch with heat sutra. Within that space we connect with the truth of true nature –ultimate beauty of being –and the only “motivation” of meditation is presence –not to miss your life.

Zinn said that the origin of the word “suffer” is the same as to “carry,” suggesting that it is possible to simply put down or drop the many imperatives of the mind and find peace. Again echoing Eckhart Tolle, Zinn concluded, that besides sitting quietly in a posture, that the real meditation practice is how we live our lives in full connection with the present moment.

drumsToward the end of the first day I went to the opening reception and was a bit amazed to find a very loud band of drummers from Africa performing to the delight of the crowd; to me that seemed incongruous with mindfulness.

But when I mentioned that to a leadership coach from Silicon Valley (Rebecca Arora) she wisely suggested that the effect of the drums might be to get me out of my head and into my gut. Touche.

Saturday morning featured the Google panel with the three main proponents of mindfulness within the organization.

After the disturbance on Saturday morning, the leader, Bill Duane turned over the panel to Karen May, Vice President, Learning, Google, who was still reacting to what had occurred, but echoed Duane’s comments, and expressed pride that Bill was able to maintain the sort of clarity of purpose and inner acceptance of circumstances (even when challenging) that they espoused in their work at Google. The audience gave Bill a sincere round of applause – he had actually done what Jon Kabat-Zinn had suggested:  bringing the presence practice into daily life. Karen also expressed her appreciation.

Aside about Karen: With over 20 years of professional experience as an organizational psychologist and leadership coach, Karen May joined Google in 2010 to head up the company’s learning, talent and career development programs. Karen oversees a global team that supports more than 28,000 Googlers in more than 60 offices in over 30 countries. The team implements a broad range of developmental offerings, including executive coaching, new hire on boarding, leadership development, and peer-to-peer instruction for Googlers of all levels, regions and tenure.

Karen said that there were several core values to the work their team was doing, but perhaps the key belief permeated Duane’s reaction (or non reaction) to the events of the morning:  “honoring diversity and meeting people where they are.” Then she went on to expand the conversation beyond mindfulness to wisdom, compassion and community, the other core values of her teams vision. Equally important to the concepts mentioned was putting these ideas into concrete practice, through experiments among the team and then throughout the enterprise.  They start every meeting with a meditation led by Bill, with attention to breath and a guided movement toward compassion and understanding.

Karen suggested that at the outset the team’s work was basically an experiment among themselves. What they found initially surprised them; the most skeptical member of their team turned out to be one of the strongest proponents of their practices – he said that he had observed that “he was a better person” after several weeks of engaging in the practices. He was fervent in wanting to take these practices directly out into all of Google but the team was more restrained and worked with other elements including gratitude exercises, Tai Chi sessions, and eventually they produced 15 master-led meditation videos; all of these offerings were completely optional for Google employees but have been increasingly popular and widely adopted. Karen emphasized that the key component of the corporate culture fostered by these techniques is a “posture of respect” for divergent viewpoints and backgrounds, which again resonated with the response by Bill Duane to the protests that began the session.

meng

Me (Tom Bunzel) with Meng Tan

The third member of the Google team at the Wisdom 2.0 Summit was Meng Tan, whose title is “Jolly Good Fellow, Google.”   After a successful 8-year stint in Engineering and 2 years as Google EDU’s Head of Personal Growth, he now serves with Google’s Talent Team.  His current mission is to “Enlighten minds, open hearts, create world peace.”

Meng’s focus is on developing skillful “champions” of mindfulness within the organization who can both model and teach the various techniques. Beyond such masters, he emphasizes that each member of the Google community develop his or her own practice of serenity and wisdom (bottom up).  As an engineer he also contends that explaining the science behind these practices will more easily enable proponents to extend the benefits of mindfulness, meditation, yoga, or whatever practice they choose (if any—all is voluntary) to others and it will proliferate organically throughout the organization.

Meng’s dream is a time when everyone at Google (and beyond) is “wise and compassionate and can deepen their practice in harmony with the company, their families and the world at large”

 

Bill Duane concluded Google’s presentation with these suggestions for fostering these techniques in any organization:

  • Build mindfulness support among true believers
  • Consistently espouse best values
  • Note the cognitive improvement that unfolds
  • Create supportive networks to continue these practices
  • Manifest ethical leadership at all levels

Another fascinating session was “The Mindful Workspace: Proximity, Compassion, and Generosity” presented by Jonathan Rosenfeld, Ph.D. who, has been advising businesses, non-profit organizations and government agencies for over 20 years and brings a psychological and systemic perspective to change management. (Change management is a buzzword that is used by many consultants in their work with organizations and it is refreshing to see the principles of greater wisdom applied to the field)

Generally the concept has been to align goals with that of management –which would essentially be greater profit.  Many of the coaches and consultants that presented at the conference, echoing Rosenberg’s principles, are bringing the deeper needs of all employees into focus so that change is seen as an empowering movement and not so fervently resisted. Rosenberg mentioned two things which I particularly liked –he reminded the audience of the Greek notion of philocracy,

Philocracy – the power/rule of love; love as a governing principle.

Philocracy is a system of conscious organization. It is the assumption that what you love and understand you will also manage well. Philocracy assigns responsibility only within each person’s sphere of wisdom -the area in which they can demonstrate conscious love”

In addition, Rosenberg put this in terms our tech-imbued world can understand, calling this a “new operating system.” We might think of it as “uninstalling” a bottom line mentality and replacing it with a new human-centric program to allow for organic change management.

Mid Saturday was the first official lunch break and it provided the opportunity to meet some of the 2000 fellow attendees.  When one considers the scope of the conference, much of it was actually watched on giant screens unless one could get close enough to the stage. But a major attraction was the “scene” itself, and lunch provided a great chance to meet like minded souls.

I encountered a company from Pasadena that teaches mindfulness practices, Tools for Peace (TFP) is dedicated to strengthening and supporting emotional and social intelligence as well as academic and professional success. TFP has partnered with over 20 organizations, universities and schools. TFP developed Stop, Breathe & Think (SB&T), a step-by-step mindfulness, meditation and compassion-in-action curriculum that guides participants through a variety of mindfulness activities, personal reflection and group discussion. Participants begin with an introduction to mindful breathing, a basic building block of mindfulness, and build upon that skill by following a three-step process. I also exchanged cards and later had drinks with a fellow writer, Kartik Subbarao, who is another engineer who has “awakened” and written a book on “Enlightening Technical Leadership.” All in all, for me, Saturday afternoon was amazing.

Therefore, as Arianna Huffington, founder and CEO, Huffington Post presented a session after lunch titled (“Thrive:  The Third Metric: Redefining Success Beyond Money & Power” –upcoming book by same title), and confidently proclaimed, to tumultuous applause, “we have reached critical mass.”  A discussion of consciousness or wisdom is not just for quiet corners of cocktail parties away from the “realists,” but it is now in the board rooms of major corporations.  2013 year was the year well-known CEOs “came out” as meditators. And these techniques are no longer considered “far out” or “New Age;” but rather when actually applied they can bring a profound level of awareness and insight to even challenging circumstances—even apart from their usefulness in the ordinary world of meetings, agendas and productivity. Arianna says that it is

“time to redefine the notion of success from a two legged school of money and power. They may hold us up temporarily, but sooner or later we’re going to topple over. We need a third leg –a third metric for defining success –to truly thrive. That third metric, she writes in Thrive, includes our well-being, our ability to draw on our intuition and inner wisdom, our sense of wonder, and our capacity for compassion and giving.”

According to her, the third metric is composed of four pillars:

  • Well being
  • Wisdom
  • Wonder
  • Giving

She suggested that instead of resumes we shape our lives according to what may become our eulogies –not how hard we work or worldly accomplishments but how we live. She said that Wisdom 3.0 is about applying these principles to a life  shaped from the inside out; she quoted Rumi who said we should “live life as though everything is rigged in our favor.”

Arianna shared a personal story that she said might well have an analog with many in the audience –that her shift was precipitated by tragedy and a low point where daughter almost died from cocaine addiction.  She refers to such moments as pivotal “entry points” into our journey or path of growth and enlightenment. When she herself collapsed from exhaustion at one point, she realized that there is “no success” in “lying in a pool of blood in my house.” Arianna concluded by urging those present to “embrace your entry point” and as a symbol of community actually gave out her “personal” email address; not surprisingly it’s arianna@huffingtonpost.com

This was followed by a candid conversation between the singer and songwriter, Alanis Morissette and Dan Siegel, Mindsight Institute. Dr. Siegel is currently clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine and he is the founding co-director of the UCLA Mindful Awareness Research Center. An award-winning educator, he is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and recipient of several honorary fellowships.

The pair was openly enamored of one another and were both colleagues and friends.  They talked about receptivity and openness in both the therapeutic space in which Dr. Seigel works and the creative world of Ms. Morissette. They discussed the essence of “connection” and conscious conversation, Alanis saying that “at my best I am nothing,” meaning that she is open to what the world and other people are bringing.

Dr. Siegel said that “conscious communication is renegade experience of neural communication” because monologue to monologue is the American way based on individualism, which leads to non-listening and the preparation of what one will say next, rather than a space for what is. So to actually be open during dialog is “renegade,” in its being counter to much of our conditioning toward self-protection and even aggression. Alanis concurred, adding that “aloofness is the survival strategy in Hollywood” and the conversation moved on to the way today’s technology is used as a buffer between people. To text is to avoid real contact and to hide –and in many ways to give in to a fear of real connection.

Both said that it is important to be able to “articulate without interruption” and Dr. Siegel used the concept of “integration as the basis of wisdom” –meaning the ability to be present with all parts of our selves (not just the formative mind) in order to connect. Integration is basis of peace and compassion. He mentioned his brain research which confirms the potential for digital media to disconnect us from ourselves; we become addicted for two reasons –for pleasure to release dopamine and for obsession (clicking on email).

Many therapies bring relief but not healing –integration is a means of creating “Connectones” or  integrative fibers within the brain that reduce chaos and foster harmony. He wondered about Alanis’ experience and asked, “what does songwriting feel like?” – eliciting a “non mental but physical response.” She described it as “somatic” –a way to actually take love in and said that there is no real “choice” in the matter for her – it is an “existential imperative” to create.

But when Dr. Siegel asked whether she experienced healing whether in writing or performing, she said that she did not –the creative process was not experienced by her as a means of healing but perhaps more of being “heard” and receiving without judgment.

They discussed gadgets and how texting can be both a way to use tech to withdraw but potentially also for raising integration if it becomes the means for a deeper way of connecting and becoming linked to one another. Here Dr. Siegel made perhaps one of the key remarks (for me) of the entire conference when he suggested (as a scientist) that his studies in the brain and the apparent “nonexistence” of a coherent self has led him to the realization that there is no reason the self should be bounded by our skin We are ‘not the body’.  The self is both me and we and ultimately a new, and perhaps third entity, a MWE.”

Coming from an eminent scientist this kind of blew my mind because in my own experience of meditation and the practice of daily acceptance I have had insights into the reality (not the metaphor) that who “I am” is truly not bounded by my physical form. It doesn’t last, it is quickly “rationalized” and “integrated” within the material view that is still the societal norm, but to hear a scientist articulate the concept so clearly was truly a revelation.

The afternoon continued with a presentation by Tony Hsieh, CEO, Zappos.com. Tony Hsieh is an American internet entrepreneur and venture capitalist. Tony talked about how Zappos and other new startups are starting to leverage the Downtown Project in Las Vegas to accelerate innovation, productivity, “Return on Community, and Return On Luck.”

eckhart

Eckhart Tolle on stage.

Then the audience crammed in for what for me was the highlight of the conference, a talk on “The Power of the Present Moment, A Meditation, by Eckhart Tolle. I had never seen Eckhart “in person” and my seat was not great –but it was interesting because I went early and everything was already taken but in the last moment a woman gestured to a guy in front of me that the seat beside her was available, even though it had a coat draped on it.  I quickly confirmed it and sat down. Soren introduced Eckhart and said that a standing ovation was not called for –and that he “would prefer to feel your presence.” I could sense the incredible appreciation and love that greeted Eckhart Tolle when he humbly and modestly took his seat.

He started with what he called the deepest question one may ask, which echoed many of the other presenters – to “ask what life wants from you.” Then he began to describe a three-step process of becoming conscious” and emphasizing that each person can only arrive at a stage relative to his conditioning and being.

How to abide in presence?

The first step is simple Awareness –I am here.  Noticing what is–paying attention to our surroundings, and then our constant habit of thinking begins to quiet. Most of our attention is on the endless stream of thoughts, he explained. “And most of it useless!” The second step is noticing what else is happening around you –and recognizing the wonder of it –sensing an appreciation for the many forms that exist –but again doing so without labeling or thinking but simply acknowledging the infinite variety of nature apart from one’s commentary about it. Eckhart’s third stage is even deeper –to begin to inquire and sense “what is it that knows” or notices all of these things? Or rather what is it besides the content of our thoughts or perceptions, but instead is the subjective container of these experiences.

For example, he continued, in sensing hands, how do I know them? Our thoughts demand attention but if we close our eyes, do we need a thought to know that our hands are there? Can one begin to sense a vibration or energy within the body that is beyond thought –that indeed perceives thought along with sensation, feeling and external forms?

This recognition of Being is “no thing” and what Jesus called “the Kingdom of Heaven.” “But who understands Jesus,” Eckhart joked, “only a few Buddhists.” Eckhart also reemphasized the practice of these concepts – he said that “presence is a state that you can only know by experiencing it, he says. You cannot “conceptualize it.”

“The essence of you is inseparable from the essence of the present moment.  The essence of now is ultimately who you are”

Karen May of Google then returned to the main stage for a “One-on-One with Eckhart Tolle: Awakening in the Digital Age.” Karen noted the enthusiasm and calm of the audience and mentioned how unusual it was to be able to lead a meditation by teaching and instill an actual and tangible experience in those present. She attributed this to Eckhart’s presence and spontaneity –the live freshness he brought to the occasion, and then “in a gesture of presence” she actually tore up her own notes with laughter and appreciation from the audience. She asked Eckhart about the apparent contradiction between his emphasis on dropping one’s “personal story” or commentary by the voice in the head and the use of stories in an organization to foster respect for diversity and communication.

Eckhart suggested that in one’s communication one should look deeply at the other person and not at one’s story about them, or their story –to not confine one’s connection to such a story. A big part of this would be not to think while conversion  but to listen deeply –that the gift of one’s true attention is perhaps the greatest one can convey. Eckhart said that “usually you only get this from a dog.” He suggested that communication become the “personal and spacious dimensions dancing” and that one acknowledge both.

Our “collective story reinforces our roles” which in a corporate environment is necessary up to a point but can also inhibit spontaneous communication. Presence is the key and Eckhart reminded the audience about Ram Dass’ statement on enlightenment –“If you think you’re enlightened, spend a week with your family.”

Similar tests of presence obviously abound in meetings and the corporate world. Eckhart said that it is important to always keep in mind that “one can only behave at one’s level consciousness” and that presence can best be practiced in brief encounters and initially when there is little at stake.  Try to put down the cell phone and truly engage with the clerk in the grocery store and bank, and notice the difference in energy that ensues.

When Karen asked for more ideas about meetings, Eckhart said that if necessary, “you can be the only one (truly) present at a meeting, but cautioned against the Egoic trap of taking oneself as ‘enlightened’ as a feeling of superiority.” “Choose to be present with complete attention,” he said, “not fueling conflict or group unconsciousness.”

Karen and Eckhart then engaged in a discussion of how gadgets can both foster and distract from communication – at that point a cell phone rang and Eckhart wondered, “is it mine?”

ekchart - karen

Eckhart Tolle & Karen May. Eckhart wants to take a selfie.

The audience roared.  He cautioned that gadgets can indeed “fill up our mind” which is the antithesis of true mindfulness –he dislikes that term preferring “presence” because he is a proponent of using the mind only for vital tasks and otherwise disengaging the voice in the head. On that point he said he does now text, but he has invented “spacing” or sending an empty text message, which has flummoxed some of his friends.

He reminded the audience of Arianna Huffington’s practice of making her bedroom  a gadget free zone, to avoid the burnout that can ensue when our devices take over. He made fun of email in his own inimitable style by modeling how when an email comes in, we can react automatically by “assuming that every message is urgent and important. They aren’t.” As he did this he hunched over an imaginary device, feigning typing with his thumbs, as he looked furtively upward and around as though in deep thought and agitation by the necessity to reply to every message he had received.

He cautioned against the addictive aspect of gadgets, like cell phone and compared them to TV which also makes people addicted to thinking and ultimately they suffer; especially with television or media which suggests that the future holds a promise that can never be fulfilled.  “Don’t let children get lost in digital world.” He stressed again that the ultimate lesson is that only the present moment is true Life.  All else is illusory. Karen asked him what give him hope and Eckhart replied, “this moment” (with the audience – he gestured around the vast room), and they concluded.

My final experience was in what might have been “the largest yoga class ever in San Francisco,” led by Gopi Kallayil who is the Chief Evangelist at Google for Brand Marketing. Prior to that he was Chief Evangelist of Google+ for Brands, and previously he worked on marketing the company’s flagship advertising product, AdWords, in the Americas and Asia Pacific.

Gopi called the human body the most advanced technology we know, and gave a glimpse of a “portable yoga practice” that would enable participants to “instantly change state intentionally.” Before the Sunday lunch break he demonstrated and led the audience in a series of yoga postures from beginner to moderately advanced, and modeled conscious breathing. Gopi reiterated that all of these techniques are now made available to Google employees on a voluntary basis.

IN SUMMARY
musingThis overview only the scratches the surface of what comprised the Wisdom 2.0 Summit. In the exhibit hall there were many products, services and practitioners including InterAxon, the makers of Muse headgear, a “hardware” company that reprograms the brain’s “software.” Muse combines training sessions to help you manage stress and calm your mind with real time feedback on your brain’s response to the training. This allows you to track and improve your brain over time so you can enhance the mental skills you already have and do more with your mind than you ever thought possible.

Muse uses sensors to detect and measure your brain activity, just as a heart monitor measures heart rate. This activity is converted into information you can track on your tablet, smartphone or PC via Bluetooth This information is given to you in both audio and visual form so you can see and hear your brain’s performance in real time.

As I mentioned, beyond the sessions and exhibits one of the most profound things to stand out at Wisdom 2.0 was the energy and vitality of 2000 like minded souls.  Finally, I also had the chance to lead a “hosted conversation” which attracted two new friends to a discussion of my own passion, the connection between software and genetics.

As I left San Francisco, I felt deeply that this conference was an event that truly “Life was calling me” to attend.  Namaste.

You Can Help Stop The 5G Infrastructure

We plan to investigate the telecom industry, it’s ties to politics, and expose its efforts to push 5G while ignoring the dangers and without proper safety testing, but we can't do it without your support.

We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done.

Check out our plan and join our campaign here.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Discover

Dutch Company Reveals An Electric Car That Charges Itself With Sunlight

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A Dutch company has unveiled an electric car that charges itself with via solar power.

  • Reflect On:

    How long have solutions to our problems existed? Is finding the solutions the problem, or have they been here for a long time? If we have the solutions readily available, the what's the problem that we need to identify?

A Dutch company from Eindhoven has released a prototype car that has already sold 100 orders to be filled in 2011. What’s special about the car is that it is completely electric as well as solar powered. The prototype car actually won the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge, and it represents the world’s very first long-range solar car. It’s a four passenger vehicle and it’s called Lightyear One.

According to the company, the car will get to a range of approximately 725 km, and 400 km in the winter at highway speeds with heating on. This is truly amazing, and it represents what humans have had the ability to do for a number of years. Just imagine if every single car was electric and solar powered? You would never need to charge your car, it would always be self charging. It completely takes conventional charging and gas out of the equation, which is amazing.

Here at Collective Evolution, we’ve always talked about how humanity has many of the solutions to our problems. Often times, the issue isn’t with finding solutions to the world’s problems, it’s with actually implementing them. The systems and all of the red tape and corruption that take place have prevented us from moving forward. Electric and solar technology with regards to transportation could have been implemented a very long time ago, but again, the problem is not with having the solution, it’s with implementation. This problem has plagued our world for a very long time, and it’s something we need to continue to be vocal about.

Although this particular car can be charged using the sun, it also has the option to be plugged into a power outlet. It can charge up to 400 km at night from a normal household electrical outlet.

Some other points about the car include:

  • The car is constructed from high-tech materials to have the lowest weight possible while maintaining stringent passenger safety.
  • The roof and hood are comprised of five square meters of integrated solar cells in safety glass so strong that a fully-grown adult can walk on them without causing dents.
  • Lightyear One is propelled by four independently driven wheels, so no energy is lost in transit from the engine to the wheel.
  • In addition to solar power, Lightyear One can be charged at a (fast)charging station or a regular outlet.
  • Crash testing has yet to be undertaken, but they’re looking forward to crashing one “for science.”

According to the company’s website:

advertisement - learn more

The optimized aerodynamics and design mean that a fully-charged battery has a range of up to 800km, more than you need to go from Amsterdam to Paris. The integrated solar cells of the 5 m2 hood and roof mean that Lightyear One charges up to 12km/h as it goes. The already superior range continues to extend with every hour of sunlight. So what starts as a drive from Lisbon to Madrid can continue on to Valencia or Barcelona without stopping for anything but food.

Unfortunately, and as expected, the car is unaffordable for most people. Production of the Lightyear One in their new facility in Helmond is still slow, but buyers can reserve one of the 500 electric vehicles for a reservation fee of €119,000 on their website  as well as find out more information by contacting the company directly with any inquiries.

The Takeaway

The takeaway here is to ask the question: Why aren’t all cars solar powered and electric? Does humanity have the potential, resources and technology to provide all citizens with ‘abundance’ when it comes to food, shelter and transportation? If we have the potential and the resources, what is it that stops us from doing so? If an electric car was invented decades ago, why are we still driving around in cars that use gas? What’s REALLY going on here on planet Earth?

You Can Help Stop The 5G Infrastructure

We plan to investigate the telecom industry, it’s ties to politics, and expose its efforts to push 5G while ignoring the dangers and without proper safety testing, but we can't do it without your support.

We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done.

Check out our plan and join our campaign here.

Continue Reading

Consciousness

Russian Military Colonel Publishes An Article Claiming Human & Animal Telepathy Is 100 Percent Real

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The Russian Ministry of Defense published an article about the existence of military parapsychology in Russian military techniques, which allows one to penetrate into the thoughts of another, hack computer programs, and communicate telepathically.

  • Reflect On:

    Why is this type of science studied at the highest levels of various governments, yet ridiculed and not studied at all within the mainstream?

Is telepathy real? It’s hard to argue against it; in fact, I would say that it’s not really up for debate. That being said, when it comes to topics like these, the field is polluted with a bad reputation given its association with magic, superstition and ‘pseudoscience,’ terms that often come from those who condemn the subject without ever really looking into it. The evidence for the existence of telepathy is actually quite overwhelming, and in many cases, much stronger than most other areas of science.

Dr. Jessica Utts is a great person to bring up, as I’ve done many times before, to hammer this fact home. She is the  Chair of the Department of Statistics at the University of California, Irvine. In 1999, she published a paper showing how the statistical significance with regards to results seen from studies under the realm of parapsychology (telepathy, remote viewing, etc) are stronger than some of the studies used to approve some medications. In a recent interview, she emphasized the following.

“What convinced me was just the evidence, the accumulating evidence as I worked in this field and I got to see more and more of the evidence. I visited the laboratories, even beyond where I was working to see what they were doing and I could see that they had really tight controls… and so I got convinced by the good science that I saw being done. And in fact I will say as a statistician I’ve consulted in a lot of different areas of science; the methodology and the controls on these experiments are much tighter than any other area of of science where I’ve worked.” (source)

Why is it that these topics are not touched by mainstream academia, yet studied at the highest levels of government? Multiple governments all over the world have been studying this phenomenon for decades, and a lot has been declassified. Take the remote viewing program that was conducted by the US government/CIA and Stanford University, for example.

After its declassification in 1995, or at least its partial declassification, the Department of Defense and those involved revealed an exceptionally high success rate.

To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon. (source)

advertisement - learn more

The latest example comes from Russia, as their Ministry of Defence recently published an article about the existence and study of parapsychology within the Russian military. The article explains how these techniques are and were used to penetrate the thoughts of the enemy (mind-reading) as well as to hack into enemy computer systems. The article is titled “Super Soldier for the Future Wars” and was published in the Defense Army magazine.

The article was written by Colonel Nikolai Poroskov, who explained that they use parapsychological techniques like telepathy for combat purposes, revealing secrets, disclosing locations, etc… He even discloses that Russian specialists have learned telepathy by working with dolphins.

As a note to readers, we here at Collective Evolution do not condone the use of animals for any type of experimentation. There is no information on the conditions of these experiments, but we are assuming they were captured for military purposes, which is extremely sad and heart-breaking.

Poroskov writes:

“They mentally gave the animals the commands that they carried out. Similar practiced by the famous trainer Durov. The technique, as it turned out, is applicable to humans. Moreover, the impact was even possible on the technique. With an effort of thought you can, for example, shoot down computer programs, burn crystals in generators, eavesdrop on a conversation, or break television and radio broadcasts and communications. Good luck ended with such experiments as reading a document lying in a safe, even if it is in a foreign language that we do not speak; identification of individuals belonging to the terrorist network; identifying potential candidates for terrorist groups,” the statement reads. (source)

Quite astonishing, isn’t it? Parapsychology seems to be the largest known threat to any type of secrecy, doesn’t it? I found the reference to hacking computers quite interesting. Can telepathy really be used for purposes like hacking electronic equipment? I did some more digging and found an interesting document inside of the CIA’s electronic reading room with regards to the Soviet Union.

Here’s a quote from the document:

The Soviet Union is well aware of the benefits and applications of parapsychology research. In 1963, a Kremilin edict apparently gave top priority to biological research, which in Russia includes parapsychology. The major impetus behind the Soviet drive to harness the possible capabilities of telepathic communication, telekinetics, and bionics is said to come from the Soviet military and the KGB. Today it is reported that the USSR has twenty or more centres for the study of parapsychological phenomena, with an annual budget estimated in 1967 at over 13 million dollars and reported to be as high as 21 million dollars.

Today, we know that trillions of dollars have gone into black budget programs in the United States, many of which likely deal with parapsychology, as they have in the past.

The document also states:

There are reports that the Soviets are training their cosmonauts in telepathy to back-up their electronic equipment while in outer space. One of these back-up schemes is known to involve coded telepathic messages. This method was previously demonstrated in March 1967, when a coded telepathic message was flashed from Moscow to Leningrad. The involvement of astronauts or cosmonauts in telepathy experiments is not necessarily unprecedented. In February 1971, during the Apollo 14 flight to the moon, astronaut Edgar Mitchell made 150 separate attempts to project his thoughts from inside the space capsule back to an individual on earth. The results of the Apollo 14 experiments have been well-documented in detail and are published in the Journal of Parapsychology. (source)

Deeper Black Budget Discussion On CETV

Again, these programs lie within the realm of the black budget and are highly classified. Who knows how far ahead of the mainstream world they truly are?

CETV is a platform we created in order to combat the censorship and demonetization we have been facing over the past few years. On episode 4 of The Collective Evolution Show on CETV, we discussed the black budget in much greater detail. Below is a clip exploring the missing money from the black budget and special access programs, explaining where the money is going and what exactly it’s being used for.

You can become a member of CETV, get access to the full show and many others, and support conscious media here.

The Takeaway

Human consciousness and parapsychology should not only be studied for the purposes of learning new defence tactics. Humans have great potential, and there is still so much that we have yet to discover about ourselves. What needs to change is the intention behind these discoveries.

You Can Help Stop The 5G Infrastructure

We plan to investigate the telecom industry, it’s ties to politics, and expose its efforts to push 5G while ignoring the dangers and without proper safety testing, but we can't do it without your support.

We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done.

Check out our plan and join our campaign here.

Continue Reading

Consciousness

New Study of Mind-Matter Interaction Via Double Slit Experiment Yields “Remarkable” Results

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A new analysis of the double slit experiment shows, according to the author, "remarkable" results when it comes to analyzing the mind-matter interaction problem.

  • Reflect On:

    Why has most of this science been studied by the Department of Defense? Why are real life, documented and recorded examples never used in these studies? Why is the statistical significance of parapsychology never mentioned?

Does mind influence matter? The answer is an unquestionable yes, this fact is firmly established in scientific literature, and the only thing up for debate is just how much of an effect our minds can have on matter.

In what’s known as the double slit experiment, tiny bits of matter (photons, electrons, or any atomic-sized object) are shot toward a screen that has two slits in it. On the other side of the screen, a video camera records where each photon lands. When scientists close one slit, the camera will show us an expected pattern. But when both slits are opened, an interference pattern emerges — they begin to act like waves. This means that each photon individually goes through both slits at the same time and interferes with itself, but it also goes through one slit, and it goes through the other. Furthermore, it goes through neither of them. The single piece of matter becomes a “wave” of potentials, expressing itself in the form of multiple possibilities, and this is why we get the interference pattern.

How can a single piece of matter exist and express itself in multiple states, without any physical properties, until it is “measured” or “observed”? Furthermore, how does it choose which path, out of multiple possibilities, to take?

Then, when an “observer” decides to measure and look at which slit the piece of matter goes through, the “wave” collapses, and then things really get interesting.

The connection between human consciousness, or factors associated with human consciousness such as intention, thoughts, feelings and emotions, and the physical realm is fascinating. This is precisely why nearly all of the founding fathers of quantum physics were so preoccupied with learning more about consciousness and “non-material” science in general. For instance, the theoretical physicist who originated quantum theory, Max Planck, regarded “consciousness as fundamental” and matter as a “derivative from consciousness.” Eugene Wigner, another famous theoretical physicist and mathematician, also emphasized how “it was not possible to formulate the laws of quantum mechanics in a fully consistent way without reference to consciousness.”

A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin, PhD explains how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality. The paper showed that meditators were able to collapse quantum systems at a distance through intention alone. The meditators were the “observer” in this case.

advertisement - learn more

In fact, as Radin points out in his lecture, a “5 sigma” result was able to give CERN the Nobel Prize in 2013 for finding the Higgs particle (which turned out not to be Higgs after all). In this study, they also received a 5 sigma result when testing meditators against non-meditators in collapsing the quantum wave function. This means that mental activity, the human mind, attention, and intention, which are a few labels under the umbrella of consciousness, compelled physical matter to act in a certain way.

“Observations not only disturb what has to be measured, they produce it… We compel [the electron] to assume a definite position… We ourselves produce the results of the measurement.”

Fascinating, isn’t it?

The New Study

I recently came across a post on Radin’s Facebook page regarding a new study just published in PLOS ONE titled Independent re-analysis of alleged mind-matter interaction in double-slit experimental data.

His Facebook post reads,

Just published. “… this paper is the third independent statistical analysis … showing significant differences in fringe visibility between concentration and relaxation epochs of human subjects….”. The author made several assumptions that differed from ours, which resulted in reduced statistical power. That in turn led to a more conservative conclusion. Even so, anomalies were clearly found in these data that defy ordinary explanations.

In that study, they provided a “two year long experimental dataset in which authors of Radin, et al., 2016 claim to find evidence of mind-matter interaction is independently re-analyzed. In this experiment, participants are asked to periodically shift their attention towards or away from a double-slit optical apparatus. Shifts in fringe visibility of the interference pattern are monitored and tested against the common sense null hypothesis that such shifts should not correlate with the participant’s attention state.”

They concluded that:

The thorough analysis pursued in this paper gives a much broader and full picture of the data than the ones previously published in [1] and [19]. On the one hand, we find undeniable anomalies in the human data with shifts of the fringe visibility in the direction expected by human intention. The fact that fringe visibility decreases when human intention tries to make it decrease, and increases when human intention tries to make it increase is remarkable.

That being said, the authors concluded that they still cannot give a definitive conclusion on mind-matter interaction. However, publications like this are still a huge step forward.

They also mention a very important point: The stigma behind these findings and how it encroaches on belief systems have perhaps not allowed a more rigorous scientific investigation into these subjects.

Given the controversial aspect of this research, attempts to reproduce such an experiment should be done by groups of experts from different fields of research including quantum mechanics, neuroscience and statistics, both skeptics and believers, collaborating to design the most rigorous protocol. Personal beliefs, may they be strongly in favour or against the mind-matter interaction hypothesis, have to be put aside, to collectively pursue a clear and objective investigation of this particular interpretation of the quantum measurement problem.

Here’s another great quote alluding to the same thing:

There seems to be a deep concern that the whole field will be tarnished by studying a phenomenon that is tainted by its association with superstition, spiritualism and magic. Protecting against this possibility sometimes seems more important than encouraging scientific exploration or protecting academic freedom. But this may be changing. —Cassandra Vieten, PhD and President/CEO at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (source)

What The Authors Failed To Recognize

Never in these studies do they mention real world examples. Cases of mind influencing matter have been reported throughout history and across many cultures, more specifically in regards to ‘supernormal’ abilities such as telepathy, psychokinesis, and other phenomena that lie within the realms of parapsychology. This is evident in ancient literature, from the Vedic texts and the yoga sutras to Jesus, Moses, Milarepa, Mohammed, and more.

In 1987, researchers at the Institute of Space-Medico Engineering, as mentioned in the CIA document earlier in the article, publicized a fraction of their work in the form of a film showcasing their work and what they had accomplished.

The film showed a medicine pill moving through an irreversibly sealed glass vial, which occurred in three frames of a 400 frame per second film. (source)

Another release (about Zhang) from the CIA (Research Into Paranormal Ability To Break Through Spatial Barriers) states:

A wooden cabinet 120 by 180 by 60 centimeters was used as a sealed container. Sheets of papers and boards with one  of a kind markings were used as the target objects and placed inside the cabinet on the upper shelf. Without damaging the cabinet or opening the door, the person with ESP was able to remove the target objets and also was able to put them back inside. This demonstrates that even when using especially large container it is possible to completely break through spacial barriers, however, the success rate was much lower and was exceptionally difficult. (Source)(source)

The CIA document linked above provides more examples.

According to Eric Davis, Ph.D, FBIS, from a declassified US Air Force document obtained via the Federation of American Scientists, Shuhuang reported that ‘gifted children’ were responsible for the teleportation of small, physical objects from one place to another. (source)

A study published in the American Journal of Chinese Medicine, as seen in the the US National Library of Medicine, demonstrated that a woman with special abilities was able to accelerate the germination of specific seeds for the purposes of developing a more robust seed stock.  You can read that here.

There are many fascinating examples within the lore of parapsychology.

Many of these results are just as strong, if not stronger, than a lot of the results that come from hard sciences like physics and mechanical engineering. As far back as 1999, the head of the statistics department at UC Irvine, Jessica Utts, published a paper showing that results dealing with parapsychology and mind-body connection are a lot stronger than the results used to approve some of our medications!

The Takeaway

The idea that mind influences matter is not new. From a hardcore scientific perspective, the results may be questionable, but we have to transcend science as its current parameters have become some sort of religion, failing to take into account many factors. A lot of science today has been dominated and taken over by the corporate world. The politicization of science is a real thing, and new science has confirmed the metaphysical world and is breaking down current and old paradigms. Everything from the mind-body connection to quantum physics and parapsychology are showing us how much more we have to learn about ourselves and what we are capable of.

Thing about the implications this could have for our planet? Imagine if billions of people all over the world found peace within themselves, what type of world would we create?

You Can Help Stop The 5G Infrastructure

We plan to investigate the telecom industry, it’s ties to politics, and expose its efforts to push 5G while ignoring the dangers and without proper safety testing, but we can't do it without your support.

We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done.

Check out our plan and join our campaign here.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod