Connect with us

Political

What Happens When You Confront A Rothschild Banker

Published

on

 

advertisement - learn more

We all like to talk about how the elite of this world are greedy psychopathic individuals who don’t see the harm in destroying the planet and impoverishing fellow human beings for the sake of accumulating wealth and power for themselves. Most of us have probably thought about what we would say if we came face to face with one of them.

Well, that’s what Luke Rudkowski, founder of We Are Change and Change Media University, has done countless times ever since he chose to become an independent journalist. [Click HERE to learn how YOU can too]

This confrontation with Lord Jacob Rothschild, british investment banker and a member of the prominent Rothschild banking family, is only one of many. It may be short, but the silence and perplexed look on the banker’s face is quite telling. In my opinion, the most important statement that was made in this confrontation is that we, as a people, are waking up and their plan to expand control over the human race is becoming irrelevant.



Below are two more must-see confrontation videos that I personally found more revealing.

advertisement - learn more

In the first video, General Wesley Clark is asked about a speech he made where he revealed pentagon plans for War with seven countries in five years. His reaction speaks volumes!

The second video is particularly satisfying since Newt Gingrich is confronted a second time after he denied his attendance at the Bohemian Grove, but this time, Luke asks him to sign a picture of Newt himself at the Bohemian Grove!


Wesley Clark Confrontation – Click Here                    Newt Gingrich Confrontation – Click Here

What If WE Become The Mainstream Media?

Time and time again the mainstream media continues to ignore the real issues, reinforce the status quo and propagate fear, powerlessness and division amongst us. What if more of us decided to take the matter into our own hands and report on what is really going on while being a source of inspiration driving others to be the change they wish to see in the world? This is what Luke Rudkowski and his team desire to help accomplish with their new online journalism school Change Media University.

“Knowledge is power. The mainstream media holds it, they control it and they only use it to serve the purpose of their rulers, of the corporations, of the governments, of the people who pay them, of the people who are in charge and in control. What if we decentralize that, take that power away from them, shame them and make them obsolete by doing their job better? What if we become the mainstream media and empower individuals in every city, in every state, in every country around the world? If we are able to empower ourselves, be the voice of the voiceless, show things that no one else is talking about, highlight injustices and stand up for each other together together as a community, imagine the difference and the change we can actually make.” – Luke Rudkowski

I personally have assisted Change Media University’s online courses and worked with Luke himself and see tremendous potential in building an army of reporters willing to expose not only what is truly going on behind the political scene, but bring awareness to projects, ideas, solutions that have the power to change the world.

If you feel drawn to this path, here is how CMU can help you:

  • CMUThis course will teach you from A to Z how to start and run your own independent journalism career. You will be given the tools to be self-reliant, be your own boss, be able to do what you love and express yourself for a living.
  • You will get professional resources that you cannot get anywhere else. This includes press passes, registration letters, assignment letters, easy how-to guides, tips and tricks of the trade that could only be given to you by a 11 year veteran of the field. Secrets of the trade that you have not heard anywhere else.
  • You will hear from 4 different successful experts in this course that paved their own way and are doing what they love for a living.
  • After completing this course you will be equipped with all the information and knowledge to get into any event, interview anyone that you want, fully produce content, edit it, monetize it, and promote it successfully.
  • The most important thing that you will get from this course is one on one personal attention and consultation from Luke Rudkowski. The main goal of this course is to grow independent media and tell the world the truth. This can only be achieved that with you!

Check out CMU’s new satire video on “How to Be a Real Journalist” which will give you a taste of the amazing and fulfilling work you could be doing if you decided to become an independent journalist without putting yourself through the burden of debt or outdated ideas and curriculum.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

The “Unmasking Antifa Act Of 2018”: The Nonsense Never Ends

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A bill has recently been submitted to Congress that specifically targets groups of people wearing masks who are preventing others from exercising their constitutional rights.

  • Reflect On:

    Can we see how much of what the government is doing with regards to violent protests and counter-protests is complicit with the way these protests are being used to prevent us from dealing effectively with the real issues?

Last year, in an attempt to condemn the ‘violence and domestic terrorism’ that took place during events between August 11 and August 12, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia, the Senate tabled the ‘Charlottesville Resolution’ whose main purpose was ‘rejecting White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups, and urging the President and the President’s Cabinet to use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups.’

Wow. Those Senators are really earning their salaries, aren’t they? Bravo–they’ve given the government more power to suppress the narrative of a certain segment of the population.

Unmasking Antifa

Now this year, in an attempt to stem the rising violence perpetrated by the group called Antifa, Congress introduced Bill H. R. 6054:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unmasking Antifa Act of 2018’’.

SEC. 2. INTERFERENCE WITH PROTECTED RIGHTS WHILE IN DISGUISE.

advertisement - learn more

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 249 the following:

‘‘§ 250. Interference with protected rights while in  disguise

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, while in disguise, including while wearing a mask, injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both.

Wow. They’re really getting to the heart of the matter here, aren’t they?–the masks. Granted, threatening the ‘free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to <any person> by the Constitution’ was already a punishable crime, even without a mask, but let’s not let that get in the way. The government should be congratulated for their accomplishment here, which again is doing nothing except giving themselves more power to suppress the narrative of a certain segment of the population.

Who Supports These Groups?

I personally don’t know of anyone who supports White Nationalists, White Supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, or other hate groups. I also don’t know anyone who supports Antifa.

To be perfectly honest, I’m not even sure if many of the people that go out to protest and counter-protest in public are necessarily ardent supporters of their respective group’s fundamental ideologies. I believe many are paid mercenaries. Others may be looking for an opportunity to vent their own suppressed anger.

Can We Ignore Them?

Ideally, we should be completely ignoring violent groups with such extremist ideologies. But there is a reason we have a hard time doing so. It is because it is these groups that get to star in the mainstream media circus and in the political discourse, at the exclusion of the vast majority of citizens who are moderate, reasonable, and have legitimate grievances. Isn’t it farcical that we are still talking about the Ku Klux Klan? That they still exist?

There is a reason that groups like the KKK seem to be getting recycled from the dustbin of history, at the same time newer extremist movements like Antifa are being well-funded and supported: their violent confrontations continue to be used by the financial elite as a smoke screen to grab our attention and fill the headlines, all while discouraging the moderate and reasonable majority from actually speaking up in public about the real issues that face us today, about the real and obvious tyranny the financial elite continue to perpetuate.

Embers Of Fear Dying Out

For the financial elite, the agenda itself is irrelevant; as long as violence, chaos, and polarization are created, they are able to keep their game going and hold on to power. But it’s getting harder and harder for them to stoke the fires of fear and violence, as they need to infuse more energy and resources than ever to bring these events together.

As we awaken and evolve, more and more of the population is turning away from angry and violent opposition as a way of dealing with issues. It’s important that we remain conscious and avoid the temptation to participate in the false left/right dichotomy that is constantly on display in the political arena and in the mainstream media. As we see these violent confrontations fundamentally as staged events, and stop giving our emotional energy to one side or other of the polarity, these techniques will no longer have their intended effect, and we can look forward to the day that they will have eventually petered out.

Free David Wilcock Screening: Disclosure & The Fall of the Cabal

We interviewed David about what is happening within the cabal and disclosure. He shared some incredible insight that is insanely relevant to today.

So far, the response to this interview has been off the charts as people are calling it the most concise update of what's happening in our world today.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading

Alternative News

The Deep Truth Behind Why Trump Is President

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Since Trump's presidency, we have seen many of humanities shadows thrust into conversation. Not just shadows of Trump, but each and every one of us. The media has been aggressively opposing Trump almost all the way through.

  • Reflect On:

    What is Trump's presidency showing us about ourselves? Why are we seeing a full out media attack on Trump? Is the cabal losing power? Are we beginning to see the first stages of big shifts away from oppressive regimes?

A little backstory before we get into the video below. Back in 2016, following the election, we had stated that there seemed to be a pretty large shift in power given that Trump made his way into office. How did this happen? Here is a brief outline.

There is a divide taking place within the Cabal/Deep State. This divide is causing power struggles as some facets work to move away from the entirely destructive means of the previous many decades, and instead work towards a different path. Is this an entirely ‘good’ path? No, but we’re going to see this as a HUGE welcome improvement as we continue to shift our consciousness.

This divide works its way through intelligence agencies whereby ‘white hats,’ as you can call them, begin to bring forth leaks, information and dealings that help break apart the extremely oppressive end of the cabal. White hats are essentially everyday individuals, like Snowden was, who work inside intelligence agencies and who are also having a shift in consciousness within themselves. No longer do they wish to support the ways of the old, the ways it would have been if Hillary made it into office.

So we begin to see a power struggle, one that is obviously coming as a result of having an ‘outsider’ in office that is shaking things up QUICKLY.

How Did Trump Get In?

First off, what I mentioned above is a big part of it. On top of that, was the flip in electoral college manipulation that usually takes place when a president is chosen. Was Hillary Clinton furiously angry after the election because she didn’t get enough support from the general populace? No, she was furiously angry because her side of the Cabal/Deep State, who promised her a win and bought the entire media to help make it happen, flipped in part, causing enough of a change to have Trump get in.

Now typically people tend to think that when you talk about things in this manner it means you are in favor of Republicans and Trump. But this is primitive thinking in that it only looks at one tiny layer of what’s happening to apply an explanation we can then be comfortable with. When in reality, all that is happening here is we are looking at what is ACTUALLY happening, not what we are being told what is happening.

advertisement - learn more

You do not have to be pro Trump, pro Republican, or even in support of politics at all, for that matter, to see what’s truly taking place here.

Regardless, questions have been coming in for months and months to CE, asking what we think about Trump, whether we are in support of him and what all of this ‘chaos’ means. Of course, some, because we speak about things honestly and from a neutral perspective, tend to think we side with Trump because SOME of the actions of his administration and who’s behind him are actually in favor of humanity, and we report on them.

But regardless of the amount of explanation we have tried to bring to this somewhat complicated situation, I felt we needed something VERY clear. So I created a video expressing what Trump’s presidency truly means for our collective consciousness and 3 very big factors that are being brought forth through his time in office. This video will answer the topic this article is titled as.

Please take the time to watch and digest this, as it will answer so many questions regarding Trump and what is taking place.

Free David Wilcock Screening: Disclosure & The Fall of the Cabal

We interviewed David about what is happening within the cabal and disclosure. He shared some incredible insight that is insanely relevant to today.

So far, the response to this interview has been off the charts as people are calling it the most concise update of what's happening in our world today.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading

Alternative News

July 4th, 2018: Should We Be Celebrating Independence, Or Fighting For It?

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The history of America can be seen as a testimonial of a slow and steady degradation of human liberty and self-determination.

  • Reflect On:

    Do the words and ideas of the founding fathers give you an idea about our natural right to freedom and self-determination? What would happen in America if a majority of people has an awareness of what we are naturally entitled to as human beings?

July 4th celebrations in America in recent years have been tinged by the suspicions of a growing number of citizens that their independence has long been revoked.

Independence means more than having one’s own government on native soil and no longer being considered a ‘colony’ of another power; it also means that one’s own government is in full subservience to the will and the liberty of its people.

It is with such convictions that writings such as Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense became widely considered to have been influential in the decision on the part of American colonists to declare their independence from Britain.

Condemnation of The English Constitution

In his pamphlet, Paine characterizes government as a necessary evil, not a boon or device for human liberty in any iteration. Governments arise by necessity when a population gets to a certain size wherein rule by the collective becomes too unwieldy.

The implementation of government by a people, which was the task ahead of American colonists who sought independence, were informed by analyses of the form of government that Americans had suffered under, namely the English Constitutional Monarchy. Paine’s brief comments on it begin to reveal its shortcomings:

I know it is difficult to get over local or long standing prejudices, yet if we will suffer ourselves to examine the component parts of the English constitution, we shall find them to be the base remains of two ancient tyrannies, compounded with some new republican materials.

advertisement - learn more

First.—The remains of monarchical tyranny in the person of the king.

Secondly.—The remains of aristocratical tyranny in the persons of the peers.

Thirdly.—The new republican materials, in the persons of the commons, on whose virtue depends the freedom of England.

The two first, by being hereditary, are independent of the people; wherefore in a constitutional sense they contribute nothing towards the freedom of the state.

To say that the constitution of England is a union of three powers reciprocally checking each other, is farcical, either the words have no meaning, or they are flat contradictions.

To say that the commons is a check upon the king, presupposes two things:

First.—That the king is not to be trusted without being looked after, or in other words, that a thirst for absolute power is the natural disease of monarchy.

Secondly.—That the commons, by being appointed for that purpose, are either wiser or more worthy of confidence than the crown.

But as the same constitution which gives the commons a power to check the king by withholding the supplies, gives afterwards the king a power to check the commons, by empowering him to reject their other bills; it again supposes that the king is wiser than those whom it has already supposed to be wiser than him. A mere absurdity!

There is something exceedingly ridiculous in the composition of monarchy; it first excludes a man from the means of information, yet empowers him to act in cases where the highest judgment is required. The state of a king shuts him from the world, yet the business of a king requires him to know it thoroughly; wherefore the different parts, by unnaturally opposing and destroying each other, prove the whole character to be absurd and useless.

Some writers have explained the English constitution thus; the king, say they, is one, the people another; the peers are an house in behalf of the king; the commons in behalf of the people; but this hath all the distinctions of a house divided against itself.

What we see here, and this is common to just about every government in the world, is that those who have power (in this case, the monarchy) wish to retain their power, but under severe pressure from awakening people, are forced to accede some of the power to a branch of government that purportedly represents the people (i.e. the House of Commons).

In actual fact, the way the structure plays out almost always allows the powerful to maintain power, mainly through the deception that the people (here the commons) actually have a say in important matters. It’s really a big show, whereby small loopholes and backdoors always exist or are surreptitiously created to allow the powerful (the King and the Aristocracy, in this case) to maintain the ability to eventually get exactly what they want in all but the most trivial matters.

The American Constitution

It is with the foreknowledge of all these hazards of government that the founding fathers crafted the American Constitution. But it was not immediately after declaring independence from Britain that the constitution was made. It must be understood that the 13 States at that time were acting as fundamentally independent countries, only loosely tied together by virtue of having a common oppressor they had just escaped from.

There didn’t seem to be any rush for the individual States to bind themselves more firmly into a joint constitution, mainly because they didn’t want to give the central government more power, fearing it would endanger the rights of states and individuals. However, soon after America won its independence from Great Britain with its 1783 victory in the American Revolution, it became increasingly evident that the young republic needed a stronger central government in order to remain stable. According to this History Channel article on the constitution, this is what happened when planners met and fiercely debated policy through the summer of 1787:

They developed a plan that established three branches of national government–executive, legislative and judicial. A system of checks and balances was put into place so that no single branch would have too much authority. The specific powers and responsibilities of each branch were also laid out.

Among the more contentious issues was the question of state representation in the national legislature. Delegates from larger states wanted population to determine how many representatives a state could send to Congress, while small states called for equal representation. The issue was resolved by the Connecticut Compromise, which proposed a bicameral legislature with proportional representation of the states in the lower house (House of Representatives) and equal representation in the upper house (Senate).

The Degradation Of Liberty

Without getting into details, one could say that the history of America since the signing of the Constitution, while dotted with many great achievements, is a testimonial to the slow degradation of the liberty of its citizens. Those very things that the founding fathers were so gravely aware, and tried to safeguard against–the influence of the wealthy and powerful, the dangers of centralized power and the frailty of individuals within those seats of power–have swooped in over time and, like the English monarchy and aristocracy, have managed to maintain and even far increase their own power and control at the expense of individual liberty.

In fact, it could even be argued that the commons of the late 18th century in England had more sway when it came to governmental policy than American citizens today. A 2014 study done by Martin Gilens of Princeton University entitled ‘Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens’ came to the following conclusions:

What do our findings say about democracy in America? They certainly constitute troubling news for advocates of “populistic” democracy, who want governments to respond primarily or exclusively to the policy preferences of their citizens. In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule—at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes.

When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it… if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.

There Is A Resistance

Despite all this, I believe things are not all doom and gloom. There are and always have been citizens in America who are aware that the country is not living by the original dictates of the constitution, and have been speaking out to take the power from the central authorities and the elites and restore it to individuals. For it is a natural right, not only for Americans but for all of humankind, that each individual is sovereign and self-determining, and any government set up by self-determining people is tasked with serving those people.

In this way, the creation of America has always been our best hope, an experiment in the emancipation of human individuals that has not yet run its course. Note the words of Thomas Paine:

The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances hath, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all Lovers of Mankind are affected, and in the Event of which, their Affections are interested. The laying a Country desolate with Fire and Sword, declaring War against the natural rights of all Mankind, and extirpating the Defenders thereof from the Face of the Earth, is the Concern of every Man to whom Nature hath given the Power of feeling.

We are, then, all in this together, trying to create a society and a world which protects and honors our natural right to sovereignty and individual self-determination. The more we equip ourselves with the knowledge and prudence the founding fathers had in putting together the safeguards that a properly adhered-to Constitution would provide, the more likely we will be able to guide this experiment to a successful outcome.

Free David Wilcock Screening: Disclosure & The Fall of the Cabal

We interviewed David about what is happening within the cabal and disclosure. He shared some incredible insight that is insanely relevant to today.

So far, the response to this interview has been off the charts as people are calling it the most concise update of what's happening in our world today.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

EL

Watch: Exclusive Uncut Interview With David Wilcock'Disclosure & The Fall Of The Cabal'

Enter your name and email below to watch the interview.

You have Successfully Subscribed!