Connect with us

Political

What Happens When You Confront A Rothschild Banker

Avatar

Published

on

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

 

advertisement - learn more

We all like to talk about how the elite of this world are greedy psychopathic individuals who don’t see the harm in destroying the planet and impoverishing fellow human beings for the sake of accumulating wealth and power for themselves. Most of us have probably thought about what we would say if we came face to face with one of them.

--> Become A CE Member: The only thing that keeps our journalism going is YOU. CE members get access to exclusive benefits and support our shared mission.. Click here to learn more!

Well, that’s what Luke Rudkowski, founder of We Are Change and Change Media University, has done countless times ever since he chose to become an independent journalist. [Click HERE to learn how YOU can too]

This confrontation with Lord Jacob Rothschild, british investment banker and a member of the prominent Rothschild banking family, is only one of many. It may be short, but the silence and perplexed look on the banker’s face is quite telling. In my opinion, the most important statement that was made in this confrontation is that we, as a people, are waking up and their plan to expand control over the human race is becoming irrelevant.



Below are two more must-see confrontation videos that I personally found more revealing.

advertisement - learn more

In the first video, General Wesley Clark is asked about a speech he made where he revealed pentagon plans for War with seven countries in five years. His reaction speaks volumes!

The second video is particularly satisfying since Newt Gingrich is confronted a second time after he denied his attendance at the Bohemian Grove, but this time, Luke asks him to sign a picture of Newt himself at the Bohemian Grove!


Wesley Clark Confrontation – Click Here                    Newt Gingrich Confrontation – Click Here

What If WE Become The Mainstream Media?

Time and time again the mainstream media continues to ignore the real issues, reinforce the status quo and propagate fear, powerlessness and division amongst us. What if more of us decided to take the matter into our own hands and report on what is really going on while being a source of inspiration driving others to be the change they wish to see in the world? This is what Luke Rudkowski and his team desire to help accomplish with their new online journalism school Change Media University.

“Knowledge is power. The mainstream media holds it, they control it and they only use it to serve the purpose of their rulers, of the corporations, of the governments, of the people who pay them, of the people who are in charge and in control. What if we decentralize that, take that power away from them, shame them and make them obsolete by doing their job better? What if we become the mainstream media and empower individuals in every city, in every state, in every country around the world? If we are able to empower ourselves, be the voice of the voiceless, show things that no one else is talking about, highlight injustices and stand up for each other together together as a community, imagine the difference and the change we can actually make.” – Luke Rudkowski

I personally have assisted Change Media University’s online courses and worked with Luke himself and see tremendous potential in building an army of reporters willing to expose not only what is truly going on behind the political scene, but bring awareness to projects, ideas, solutions that have the power to change the world.

If you feel drawn to this path, here is how CMU can help you:

  • CMUThis course will teach you from A to Z how to start and run your own independent journalism career. You will be given the tools to be self-reliant, be your own boss, be able to do what you love and express yourself for a living.
  • You will get professional resources that you cannot get anywhere else. This includes press passes, registration letters, assignment letters, easy how-to guides, tips and tricks of the trade that could only be given to you by a 11 year veteran of the field. Secrets of the trade that you have not heard anywhere else.
  • You will hear from 4 different successful experts in this course that paved their own way and are doing what they love for a living.
  • After completing this course you will be equipped with all the information and knowledge to get into any event, interview anyone that you want, fully produce content, edit it, monetize it, and promote it successfully.
  • The most important thing that you will get from this course is one on one personal attention and consultation from Luke Rudkowski. The main goal of this course is to grow independent media and tell the world the truth. This can only be achieved that with you!

Check out CMU’s new satire video on “How to Be a Real Journalist” which will give you a taste of the amazing and fulfilling work you could be doing if you decided to become an independent journalist without putting yourself through the burden of debt or outdated ideas and curriculum.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

News

Belgium Must Lift ‘All Covid-19 Measures’ Within 30 Days, Brussels Court Rules

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A Belgian court has ruled that the current COVID-19 measures being deployed don't have a sound legal basis. The State has 30 days to lift restrictions or face fines.

  • Reflect On:

    Why is there such a large group of people, who see issue with governmental measures, taking action to stop them? Does it show we don't agree on our collective approach? Does it show we don't agree on the threat level of COVID-19?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

COVID measures around the world have been a source for much debate around whether or not they are helpful in stopping the spread of COVID-19 and whether or not they are legal. Given the current state of our society, how it functions and how our economies work, lockdown measures essentially state that millions of everyday citizens in countries must forgo their wellbeing and financial standing to stop COVID all while huge corporations and banks make billions. Through the loss of rights and liberties we can see why COVID measures have been such a huge discussion with real implications for and against.

What Happened: A court in Brussels ruled that all COVID-19 measures put in place by the government must be lifted within 30 days or fines will begin. The ruling was based on the fact that there is no legal basis for these measures to be upheld.

The League for Human Rights had filed a lawsuit weeks prior, challenging Belgium’s way of implementing the COVID measures using what are called ‘Ministerial Decrees,’ which means they were put in place without any discussion from parliament.

“We believe that in view of the restrictions on fundamental freedoms imposed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic, a debate in Parliament was essential, […] While restrictions on these rights and freedoms may of course be made, given the importance of the issues at stake and the need to protect the rights to life and health of individuals, they must be fair and proportionate.” The League of Human Rights stated.

As I opened this piece with, the argument here is that a holistic view of society is not being taken into consideration here, as everyday citizens ability to live life is bulldozed while big corporations are rewarded, further fuelling the ongoing discussion that government does not serve people but instead corporate interests.

The Belgian State now has 30 days to provide what law they believe they are abiding by or they must lift the measures. If they fail to provide a law and do not lift measures, they face a penalty of €5,000 per day, up to a maximum of €200,000.

The laws involved here are rather nuanced and complex. As of now, measures will stay in place as they are until the Interior Ministers office completes their review of the case. The current measures are based on the Civil Safety Act of 2007, which allow the Belgian State to move quickly during “exceptional circumstances,” however, in this case the judge has ruled that the government cannot act from Ministerial Decrees while using these laws.

The State can appeal the decision, but an appeal would not suspend the execution of the judgment.

Belgium’s Chamber is set to debate pandemic law, hoping that they can come to some sort of agreement around a more permanent legal basis for these types of society restrictions in the future.

Why It Matters: As we’ve noted with other measures around the world, what happens in one country often creates a precedent or motivation for other countries to act as well. If the COVID-19 pandemic indeed is not as large a threat as being purported by mainstream dialogue, an idea that a great deal of science does align with, then the way to come to our societal senses here might be through grassroots legal action.

Then again, can we agree on how much of a threat COVID-19 really is? What would it take to do so? Are mainstream media and big tech, both who are censoring and ridiculing those with different perspectives, actually making coming to an agreement on the threat level of COVID-19 much worse? Are they welcoming a lack of trust in mainstream institutions by refusing to address science and perspectives that oppose the measures being taken?

The Takeaway: Society must have controversial conversations in a meaningful way. We are not getting anywhere by taking authoritarian actions that harm the well being of general society and our ability to stay connected as communities. Mainstream culture is expecting everyone to side with the idea that fringe ‘conspiracy theories’ are undermining truth in society, yet mainstream culture does not want to take responsibility for its role in this phenomenon via censorship and corporate favoritism.

People want to thrive, they are tired of being constantly handed the short end of the stick as the rich get richer. It does not take long to look with open eyes and see that government is not working to serve people as much as we’d like to think.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

News

Biden Searches for Monsters Abroad; Continues Trump Policies In Syria

Avatar

Published

on

By

6 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The US has carried out an air strike targeting "Iran-backed militias" in Syria, in the first military action undertaken by the Biden administration.

  • Reflect On:

    When it comes to war, are the "terrorists" we go after created by the same forces claiming to be handling the situation? Is military action really done to combat "terrorism?" Is our underlying worldview of separation priming us for war?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

On January 2, 2020 – while former President Donald J. Trump was vacationing on his estate in Palm Beach, Florida  – Trump ordered a strike on Qasem Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport in Iraq.   Soleimani – an Iranian Major General who led the elite Quds Force and was responsible for Iran’s military operations outside of Iran – was deeply revered within Iranian society. Soleimani’s assassination stunned many (both domestically and abroad) and signalled a heightened, dangerous escalation in the ratcheting up of U.S.-Iran tensions that Trump and his administration vigorously stoked throughout his tenure in Washington.

Trump’s administration was littered with NeoConservative war hawks who thirsted for war with Iran.  Whether it was evangelical fundamentalist and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who contended that Trump was “sent by God to defend Israel from Iran” or the appointment of arguably the most degenerative figure in modern American foreign policy – John Bolton – who should be standing trial at the ICC (International Criminal Court) for war crimes, Trump’s tenure in Washington saw America once again engaged in endless cycles of war.

Despite empty campaign promises to end forever wars, Trump increased drone strikes significantly from previous administrations, vetoed a historic bi-partisan call in Congress to end the genocide in Yemen , became one of the most aggressive arms dealers in history, and abused his office en route to having one of the most unaccountable drone/air strike records in history, fuelling U.S. killings worldwide with little (if any) check on his executive power.

So it was no surprise that Trump continued forever war policies – whether that featured Trump’s strikes in Syria or continually seeking historic increases to already bloated Pentagon defense budgets. The empty rhetoric of Trump during his campaign for the presidency quickly morphed into an obedient Trump administration that willfully did the bidding of the Foreign Policy Establishment and Military-Industrial Complex that Dwight Eisenhower so poignantly warned us about.

Enter Joe Biden – who campaigned on countering Trump’s destructive forever war policies with an emphasis on diplomacy and restoring dignity in our foreign relations – or so some thought.  Just days into his presidency, Biden ordered a strike in Syria that killed 20+ people, targeting “Iranian-backed militias” in what many (including Rep. Ro Khanna) are calling an illegal strike on a sovereign nation without consulting Congress for authorization.

Rep. Ilhan Omar wasn’t alone in pointing out the hypocrisy of Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki (who once lectured Trump on his lack of legal authority to strike Syria) who is now all of a sudden silent on the constitutional mandate to consult Congress prior to engaging in offensive military action.  Senator Bernie Sanders issued his own statement citing his deep concern with Biden’s cavalier approach to striking Syria.  Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard – who was ridiculed, maligned and slandered in the 2020 Democratic primary as a “Russian Asset” for calling out the bi-partisan hypocrisy in Syria – also reiterated her long-standing warning of meddling in the Middle-East and siding with extremist proxies for no legitimate reason as it pertains to U.S. security and stability in the region.  Even moderates (from both parties) have lined up to critique Biden, introducing legislation to strip him of war powers in the aftermath of his recklessness in Syria.

Ironically, both President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris openly criticized Trump for his foolish actions in Syria (and rightfully so) – but now have replicated Trump’s foolishness, exposing an ugly truth about American politics vis-à-vis foreign policy:  with few exceptions, Presidents from both parties have wilted mightily when it comes to challenging the bi-partisan consensus that has fueled the war machine for decades upon decades.

Coincidentally, as Biden was continuing the bi-partisan trend of obsessively bombing the Middle-East and stoking war with Iran, he was simultaneously refusing to sanction or exact any punishment against Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for his obvious complicity in the slaying of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. When asked about his decision to bomb Syria – Biden issued this warning to Iran: “You can’t act with impunity.”  Apparently, that warning doesn’t apply if you’re a Crown Saudi Prince who fuels genocide in Yemen and orders the murder of journalists.  Then, presumably, one can act with as much “impunity” as their heart desires.

Predictably, retaliatory action was taken in the wake of the strike in Syria – when rockets hit Al Asad air-base in Iraq (housing U.S. troops) on Wednesday (3/3/21) – signalling a continuation of the never-ending tit-for-tat that has typified the instability in the Middle East – bringing us ever closer to all-out war in the region.

When Trump took office in 2016 – he immediately moved to rip up the historic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – better known as the “Iran Nuclear Deal.”  This was a toxic and inherently dangerous strategy by Trump designed to goad Iran into war, squandering the hard-fought gains from the Obama administration where exemplary diplomats (from both the U.S. & Iran) engaged in painstakingly difficult negotiations to both normalize relations with Iran and prevent further nuclear proliferation.   Biden had a “slam-dunk” opportunity to enter office with an emphasis on restoring diplomatic relations with Iran.  Iran was eager to re-enter the JCPOA as Biden took office (as it had complied with the terms of the agreement) prior to Trump’s reckless abandonment of the deal. Instead, Biden has chosen to erratically strike Syria, mirroring his predecessor, rendering it far more difficult to restore productive diplomacy with Iran.

Former President and abolitionist John Quincy Adams once warned us of the very predicament we find ourselves in today:

“She (America) goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force…. She might become the dictatress of the world.”

Unfortunately – not only have we searched abroad for monsters to destroy – but in many instances we have actually *created* those monsters – and continue to do so to this day.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

News

UAF 9/11 Study Concludes “Fires in WTC Could Not Have Caused” Building 7 To Collapse

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The final report of an extensive four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process concludes that WTC 7 could not have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the official NIST explanation claims.

  • Reflect On:

    Does it seem like full disclosure in many areas, including 9/11 truth, are being held back in order to burst into public awareness simultaneously?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced on March 25th that the final report from researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks on the destruction of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001 has been completed. And as expected, it debunks the official story:

The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.

“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”

The final report, entitled A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Final Report, includes clarifications and supplemental text based on public comments submitted in response to a draft report released by UAF and AE911Truth on September 3, 2019.

The UAF team’s final report is the result of an extensive four-year computer modeling effort that was followed by a robust peer review process. The peer review included dozens of public comments as well as external review by two independent experts, Dr. Gregory Szuladzinski of Analytical Service Company, a leading expert in structural mechanics and finite element modeling, and Dr. Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University and a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.

What’s Next?

Richard Gage, president and founder of AE911Truth, said that “It is now incumbent upon the building community, the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.”

Of course, asking for a new full-scale investigation has always been the mandate for AE911Truth. One would suspect that if an investigation has not been launched by now, when a majority of the public believe something is being hidden from them about 9/11, no amount of proof about the falsity of the official statement will be able to get the ball rolling.

Still, the work that continues to be done by AE911Truth and its allies among the 9/11 victims’ families keeps this issue in the spotlight, and reminds us that important facts about 9/11 have yet to be revealed, facts that question the very nature and motivations of our government and other powerful institutions. The 9/11 activists will now use the findings in the report as part of a formal “request for correction” that the group plans to submit to NIST in the coming days. Richard Gage noted,

“The indisputable errors documented in our request for correction will give NIST no way out of correcting its deeply flawed report and reversing its conclusion that fires were the cause of the collapse.”

An admission by NIST that their conclusions about the reasons for the WTC 7 collapse is tantamount to an admission that explosives had been pre-planted in this building for this event, so we shouldn’t hold our breath. It would bring down the entire house of cards that is the official 9/11 narrative.

As I mentioned in a previous article ‘The Implosion Of Building 7 Remains The Irrefutable “Smoking Gun” Of A 9/11 Inside Job,’ the presumption of a controlled demolition would dictate that WTC Building 7 must have been slated to be hit by a plane like the other 2 towers, as part of the master plan of the perpetrators. When that was part of the plan was botched, they decided to ‘pull it,’ in the recorded words of the building’s owner Larry Silverstein. The lame “offices fires” explanation, something that had never happened before in the world to a high-rise building, was the only one that was left for them to use.

The Takeaway

Truth is coming, about 9/11, about JFK, about hidden technology, ETs and about a hundred other things. It seems to me that full disclosures of all of these have been held up, or are creeping along very slowly, as if they were being loaded into a cannon for one huge explosion of truth that is set to have a profound impact on our collective consciousness. Rather than being impatient for one particular disclosure or another, I believe it’s best to try to see a pattern that relates to the readiness of the collective mind, and do our part to prepare ourselves.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!