Connect with us

General

Mysteries That Rewrite Human History

Avatar

Published

on

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

History is written by the victors.” – Winston Churchill

advertisement - learn more

History is a wonderful and sometimes crucial aspect of reality that can give us key insight into where we have been -and where we are going.

--> Our Journalism Is Moving - Our investigative journalism and reporting is moving to our new brand called The Pulse. Click here to stay informed.

Throughout the ages, time and time again; humans have been lied to.

Whether it be aristocracy, royalty, oppressive regimes or a slew of other tyrants humans have been fed time and time again fabricated lies to suit the agenda of these parties.

But is that period truly over?

History Rewritten

Piri Reis' Impossible Map

Piri Reis’ Impossible Map

There are many holes in the fabric of mainstream history such as a map found in 1513 by Piri Reis, a famous admiral of the Turkish fleet in the sixteenth century.

advertisement - learn more

It depicts Antarctica as ice free as well as the coastlines of the Americas – this should be impossible.

According to mainstream history this should not be in existence as Antarctica apparently has had ice on it for millions of years; apparently. The map also uses mathematics as well as the longitude and latitude system which Professor Charles Hapgood has investigated and confirmed despite there being no such system at the time.

The Dulcert Portellano map of 1339 as well as other maps show according to Hapgood’s research …

almost unaltered copies of the same original.

Which is detailed in his book Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, it has also been shown that there was an advanced worldwide civilization thousands of years before ancient Egypt.

Before we enter this aspect of the information, I will tell you mainstream “history’s” view of the birth human civilization: It spontaneously appeared out of nowhere in an ancient empire known as Sumer roughly 6,000 years ago, Sumer was located in present day Iraq.

Archeologist Peter Beaumont has provided solid evidence that there was advance gold mining in Swaziland, in southern Africa 50,000 years ago.

Pyramid of the Sun

Pyramid of the Sun

In the Ancient Ruins of Rhodesia by R.N. Hall and W.G. Neal, they prove that the people of South Africa were worshiping the same god as the Pheonicians known as Baal. Which basically means that there was one advanced civilization that spanned all the way to the south of ancient Africa. The Pheonicians also traveled and operated far beyond the establishment view of only Northern Africa.

Author and explorer Semir Osmanagic discovered pyramids in Bosnia that have been measured by scientists to be over 25,000 years old. Semir has been viciously persecuted by Egyptologists who are desperate to maintain their prestige as well as the official narrative of history it seems. How could this have happened if humanity’s first civilization appeared only 6,000 years ago?

These pyramids are also massive in size and age when compared to the lesser “Great” Pyramids of Giza. Egyptologists ludicrously claim these are “hills” – despite physicist Slobodan Mizrak recording high electromagnetic intervals at the tips of these pyramids that do not occur naturally.

Clearly “natural”

Clearly “natural”

Archaeologists have entered the pyramids and concrete taken from there has been tested independently by Italy’s Polytechnic University of Turin. PUT is a leading Italian institution and they found the construction material is 5 times stronger than any concrete they’ve ever analyzed. Yet mainstream history says these are just “hills”??(image source)

I personally can’t believe this, but in actual fact they are desperately trying to hold this “truth” together; miserably in my opinion.

The Great Sphinx of Giza has 15,000 thousand years of water erosion on its surface when it is in one of the driest places in the world. Once again how could this be if the first civilization was 6,000 years ago?

Water Erosion Older Than the Sphinx

Water Erosion Older Than the Sphinx

Statue of Ramses II

Statue of Ramses II

The statue of Ramses II located in Luxor, Egypt, is made out of red granite which has a number of 7 on the Mohs mineral hardness scale; that is a density level of quartz crystal.

Ancient Knowledge via Hand-Tools?

Ancient Knowledge via Hand-Tools?

Mainstream history wants you to believe that ancient Egyptians carved a perfectly symmetrical face into some of the hardest stone known to man using primitive hand tools. The statue not only has a precisely mirrored face, it also was manifested with Pythagorean Triangle, the Golden Rectangle and Golden Triangle in mind and this can be measured on the face. Basically in “laymen” terms this statue has been encoded with sacred geometry; knowledge universally recorded by the ancients. It has advanced mathematics threaded within the very design of the face.

Archaeologist Christopher Dunn spent well over 30 years of thorough research documenting and presenting evidence that the Egyptians could not have made these monoliths (and so much more) with mainstream history’s “explanation.” Dunn concluded after decades of research that they had to have had advanced technology to create these elaborate structures.

The Broken Hill Skull w/ Bullet Wound On Second Slide

The Broken Hill Skull w/ Bullet Wound On Second Slide

In 1922, near Broken Hill, Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) a skull of a “Neanderthal” (actually Homo Heidelbergensis a distant cousin of Neanderthal and Homo Erectus from Africa) was found with a bullet hole in its head. The species is estimated to be 120-300 thousand years old and this skull was found 60 feet below the surface.

There have also been ancient, extinct animals found with bullet holes in them. This particular animal is an extinct cousin of the bison that once lived in Europe thousands of years ago, it was known as the auroch. This particular auroch skull was recovered in the Lena River in Russia, and it survived the wound because the edge has been calcified.

There are fractures known as radial fractures, these crack around the edge. Only these skulls do not have radial fractures, and this could have only happened with a projectile projected with tremendous velocity.

Auroch Skull w/ Bullet-Hole in Forehead

Auroch Skull w/ Bullet-Hole in Forehead

Recently, a phenomenal structure was discovered in South-East Turkey near the city of Sunliurf. Named Gobekli Tepe, it is primarily circular structures on top of a hill. There are T-shaped pillars that weigh up to 20 tons and are decorated with carved animals.

Animals of Gobekli Tepe

Animals of Gobekli Tepe

The site is estimated to be at least 12,000 years old and perhaps older. The German and Turkish archeologists found via geomagnetic surveys that there are also hundreds more buried. So not only do these ruins predate Stonehenge, they were also intentionally buried and that is why they are preserved so well. The archeologists asked how could primitive people have done this with hand tools? Exactly.

The Amazing Gobekli Tepe

The Amazing Gobekli Tepe

In the Khakasis region of Russia there are mines in the town of Chernogorodskiy, where a lump of coal containing a machined metal gear was found. This lump of coal had the gear embedded in it – the coal is 300-million years old. Researchers who analyzed the gear observed it was…

“very much like a toothed metal rail, created artificially. It was like parts [that] are often used in microscopes, various technical and electronic devices,”

Geologists also discovered … “[It] was found to be composed of 98 percent aluminum and 2 percent magnesium,” which led to the implication that the metallic object was created artificially.

A more “mild” example is what many are taught within public “education” as well as almost everywhere else. It is that the American Civil War fought in the United States from 1861 to 1865 was over slavery. That, to me, is also a blatant lie.

The Mysterious Metal Gear

The Mysterious Metal Gear

The truth is that Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in the rebelling states so over 1 million slaves in the Northern states were still slaves. Two of the Union states were slaves states and the war was over unfair taxes and constricting tariffs and was far more complicated than the insulting “moral” story of saving the slaves from the “bad” Confederacy. This same theme can be easily applied to World War II. United States based corporations such as GM and Ford helped the Nazis in their efforts to invade several countries while arming the United States with tanks and an assortment of other arms.

Here is a quick list of things I’ve found that we were lied to about “history”:

  • The United States and the Soviet Union both worked on as partners mind-control, weather weapons and populous “behavior control” to achieve a “New World Order” at the height of the Cold War via Project Woodpecker.
  • Hitler escaped his bunker and did not die in Berlin. It was declassified recently by the FBI he lived in Argentina into his 70’s.
  • US Government was found guilty in 1999 for the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.
  • The United States gave 1,500 Nazi scientists, war criminals, technicians and engineers immunity from persecution at the end of WWII via Operation Paperclip. Some say Hitler actually lived in the United States as a result of this Operation but that is debated.

All of these obviously contradicting mainstream history; are but a fraction of mysteries that do. The point I’m making is that history is not what you have been lead to believe it is. I am intending to tease open your mind to explore more, and consider ideas outside the “box” we have been given.

I would also like to address that my whole entire point of this article is to show that you should always question the status quo; and should never be fearful to do so. These establishments should always be questioned in my opinion:

  • History
  • Medical science
  • News (emphasis on this one)
  • Governmental bodies
  • Institutions
  • So called “experts” in any field of science
  • Any status quo that has limited Humanity or created stagnant destructive behavior and action

So there are aspects of this world that are awash with mystery. This to me is very magical, as it opens the door to something more. History is a great start but what really matters is right now. If there is still unknown being fed from the past – then it is still here today. The most wonderful thing about the unknown to me is that perhaps there is more, and this more is unlimited with its possibilities.

Thank you for reading I hope you gained new insight into the past as well as right now.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Abductions & Car Vandalism – Startling Australian UFO Report Unclassified

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An uncovered Australian report performed by their Department of Defence. “Scientific Intelligence — General — Unidentified Flying Objects” is trending again. Those who have done extensive research on UFOs will find the Australian version of disclosure to be far more intellectually honest than the American version. Albeit it was conducted decades ago.

According to ex-US intelligence official Luis Elizondo, the Defense Department’s Inspector General is presently conducting three reviews. The inquiries vary from the Department of Defense’s handling of UFO claims to Elizondo’s alleged whistleblower retribution. The open IG cases are crucial to Australia’s report because they establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the US Department of Defense is being dishonest and shady when it comes to the UFO subject. For decades, Australia has been a loyal friend of the United States. Within Australia’s boundaries, they share a military installation (Pine Gap). When a close defense ally’s intelligence agencies determined that the US was not being intellectually honest in its approach, perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that there is more to the tale than the 144 incidents studied since 2004 by the UAPTF.

The CIA became alarmed at the overloading of military communications during the mass sightings of 1952 and considered the possibility that the USSR may take advantage of such a situation.

Australian UFO study.

According to the summary, OSI, acting through the Robertson-Panel, encouraged the USAF to use Project Blue Book to publicly “debunk” UFOs. In a tragic twist of fate, when Australian authorities sought explanations from the US Air Force, the allegation was debunked. The authors of the study were depicted as conspiratorial and even crazy by the US Air Force. Ross Coulthart reported this, and it may be heard in a recent Project Unity interview. Courthart is an award-winning investigative journalist who is drawn to forbidden subjects. He also stated on the same podcast that a senior US Navy official identified as Nat Kobitz told him that the US had been in the midst of reverse-engineering numerous non-human craft. According to his obituary, Mr. Kobitz was a former Director of Research and Development at Naval Sea Systems Command.

Continue reading the entire article at The Pulse. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

PGA Tour To End COVID Testing For Both Vaccinated & Non-Vaccinated Players

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The PGA Tour has announced that it will stop testing players every week, regardless of whether they have been vaccinated or not.

  • Reflect On:

    Are PCR tests appropriate to identify infectious people? Should people who are healthy and not sick be tested at all, anywhere?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The picture you see above is of John Rahm, a professional golfer on the PGA tour being carted off the golf course after tournament officials told him he had COVID. He was healthy and had no symptoms, yet was forced to withdraw from the tournament. He was told in front of the camera’s, and a big scene was made out of the event. You would think something like that, especially when you are a big time sports figure, would be done behind closed doors with some privacy.

Earlier on in June a spokesperson for the PGA Tour said that more than 50 percent of players on the PGA tour have been vaccinated. Although it seems that the majority of players on the tour will be fully vaccinated judging by this statement, it does leave a fairly large minority who won’t be, and that’s something we’re seeing across the globe as COVID vaccine hesitancy remains high for multiple reasons.

We are pleased to announce, after consultation with PGA Tour medical advisors, that due to the high rate of vaccination among all constituents on the PGA Tour, as well as other positively trending factors across the country, testing for COVID-19 will no longer be required as a condition of competition beginning with the 3M Open. – PGA tour Senior VP Tyler Dennis

The tour recently announced that the testing of players every week will stop starting in July for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This was an unexpected announcement given the fact that, at least it seems in some countries, vaccinated individuals will enjoy previous rights and freedoms that everyone did before the pandemic. Travelling without need to quarantine and possibly in the future not having to be tested could be a few of those privileges. Others may include attending concerts, sporting events, or perhaps even keeping their job depending on whether or not their employer deems it to be mandatory, if that’s even legally possible. We will see what happens.

Luckily for professional golfers, regardless of their vaccination status they won’t have to worry about testing positive for COVID, especially if they’re not sick. This is the appropriate move by the PGA tour, who is represented by their players and it’s a move that the players themselves may have had a say in. It’s important because PCR tests are not designed nor are they appropriate for identifying infectious people. A number of scientists have been emphasizing this since the beginning of the pandemic. More recently, a letter to the editor published in the Journal of infection explain why more than half of al “positive” PCR tests are likely to have been people who are not infectious, otherwise known as “false positives.”

This is why the Swedish Public Health agency has a notice on their website explaining how and why polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are not useful for determining if someone is infected with COVID or if someone can transmit it to others, and it’s better to use someone who is actually showing symptoms as a judgement call of whether or not they could be infected or free from infection.

PCR tests using a high cycle threshold are extremely sensitive. An article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35, only 3 percent of the samples showed viral replication. This can be interpreted as, if someone tests positive via PCR when a Ct of 35 or higher is used, the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 percent. This begs the question, why has Manitoba, Canada, for example, using cycle thresholds of up to 45 to identify “positive” people?

When it comes to golf, the fact that spread occurring in an outdoor setting is highly unlikely could have been a factor, but it’s also important to mention that asymptomatic spread within one’s own household is also considerably rare. It really makes you wonder what’s going on here, doesn’t it?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

New Study Questions The Safety of COVID Vaccinations & Urges Governments To Take Notice

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 9 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A new study published in the journal Vaccines has called into question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

  • Reflect On:

    Why are people hesitant to take the vaccine? Why are scientists and journalists who explain why hesitancy may exist censored?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A new study published in the journal Vaccines by three scientists and medical professionals from Europe has raised concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines, and it’s not the first to do so. The study found that there is a “lack of clear benefit” of the vaccines and this study should be a catalyst for “governments to rethink their vaccination policy.”

The study calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) in order to prevent one death, and to do so they used a large Israeli Field study. Using the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl), the researchers were able to assess the number of cases reporting severe side effects as well as the cases with fatal side effects as a result of a COVID vaccine.

They point out the following:

The NNTV is between 200-700 to prevent on case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95 % confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

The researchers estimates suggest that we have to exchange 4 fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2-11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations. This puts the risk vs. benefit of COVID vaccination on the same order of magnitude.

We need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination, we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.

The study does point out that COVID-19 vaccines are effective and can, according to the publication, prevent infections, morbidity and mortality associated with COVID, but the costs must be weighted. For example, many people have been asking themselves, what are the chances I will get severely ill and die from a COVID infection?

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, from the Stanford University School of Medicine recently shared that the survival rate for people under 70 years of age is about 99.95 percent. He also said that COVID is less dangerous than the flu for children.  This comes based on approximately 50 studies that have been published, and information showing that more children in the U.S. have died from the flu than COVID. Here’s a meta analysis published by the WHO that gives this number. The number comes based on the idea that many more people than we have the capacity to test have most likely been infected.

How dangerous COVID is for healthy individuals has been a controversial discussion throughout this pandemic, with viewpoints differing.

Furthermore, as the study points out, one has to be mindful of a “positive” case determined by a PCR test. A PCR test cannot determine whether someone is infectious or not, and a recent study found that it’s highly likely that at least 50 percent of “positive” cases have been “false positives.”

This is the issue with testing asymptomatic healthy people, especially at a high cycle threshold. It’s the reason why many scientists and doctors have been urging government health authorities to determine cases and freedom from infections based on symptoms rather than a PCR test. You can read more in-depth about PCR testing and the issues with it here if you’re interested.

When it comes to the documented 4 deaths per 100,000 vaccinations and whether or not it’s a significant number, the researchers state,

This is difficult to say, and the answer is dependant on one’s view of how severe the pandemic is and whether the common assumption that there is hardly any innate immunological defense or cross-reactional immunity is true. Some argue that we can assume cross-reactivity of antibodies to conventional coronaviruses in 30–50% of the population [13,14,15,16]. This might explain why children and younger people are rarely afflicted by SARS-CoV2 [17,18,19].

Natural immunity is another interesting topic I’ve written in-depth about. There’s a possibility that more than a billion people have been infected, does this mean they have protection? What happens if previously infected individuals take the vaccine? What does this do to their natural immunity? The research suggesting natural immunity may last decades, or even a lifetime, is quite strong in my opinion.

There are also other health concerns that have been raised that go beyond deaths and adverse reactions as a result of the vaccine.

As the study points out,

A recent experimental study has shown that SARS-CoV2 spike protein is sufficient to produce endothelial damage. [23]. This provides a potential causal rationale for the most serious and most frequent side effects, namely, vascular problems such as thrombotic events. The vector-based COVID-19 vaccines can produce soluble spike proteins, which multiply the potential damage sites [24]. The spike protein also contains domains that may bind to cholinergic receptors, thereby compromising the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways, enhancing inflammatory processes [25]. A recent review listed several other potential side effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that may also emerge later than in the observation periods covered here [26]…Given this fact and the higher number of serious side effects already reported, the current political trend to vaccinate children who are at very low risk of suffering from COVID-19 in the first place must be reconsidered.

Concerns regarding the distribution of the spike protein our cells manufacture after injection have been recently raised by Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph who recently released a detailed in depth report regarding safety concerns about the COVID vaccines.

The report was released to act as a guide for parents when it comes to deciding whether or not their child should be vaccinated against COVID-19. Bridle published the paper on behalf of one hundred other scientists and doctors who part of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, but who are afraid to ‘come out’ publicly and share their concerns. Byram, as many others, have received a lot of criticism and have been subjected to fact checking via Facebook third party fact-checkers.

A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”

It’s also important to note that only a small fraction of side effects are even reported to adverse events databases. The authors cite multiple sources showing this, and that the median underreporting can be as high as 95 percent. This begs the question, how many deaths and adverse reactions from COVID vaccines have not been reported? Furthermore, if there are long term concerns, will deaths resulting from an adverse reaction, perhaps a year later, even be considered as connected to to the vaccine? Probably not.

This isn’t the only study to bring awareness to the lack of injuries most likely not reported. For example, an HHS pilot study conducted by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research found that 1 in every 39 vaccines in the United States caused some type of injury, which is a shocking comparison to the 1 in every million claim. It’s also unsettling that those who are injured by the COVID-19 vaccine won’t be eligible for compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) while COVID is still an “emergency”, at least in the United States.

Below is the most recent data from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Keep in mind that VAERS is not without its criticism. One common criticism we’ve seen from Facebook fact-checkers, for example, is there is no proof that the vaccine was actually the cause of these events.

A few other papers have raised concerns, for example. A study published in October of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice states:

COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”

For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.

There are a plethora of reasons why COVID vaccine hesitancy has been quite high. I wrote an in-depth article about this in April if you’re interested in learning about the other reasons.

Conversations like this are incredibly important in today’s climate of mass censorship. Who is right or wrong is not important, what’s important is that discussion about the vaccine and all other topics remain open and transparent. The amount of experts in the field who have been censored for sharing their views on this topic has been unprecedented. For example, in March, Harvard epidemiologist and vaccine expert Dr. Martin Kulldorff was subjected to censorship by Twitter for sharing his opinion that not everybody needed to take the COVID vaccine.

It’s good to see this recent study point out that the benefits of the vaccine, for some people, may not outweigh the potential costs.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Join us on Telegram

We post important content to Telegram daily so we don't have to rely on Facebook.

You have Successfully Subscribed!