Connect with us

Awareness

Vaccine Injured: Were YOU “One In A Million?” Share Your Story

Published

on

“My name is Alisa Neathery. My beautiful son Bently Stratton passed away only 5 days after receiving 11 vaccinations in one visit. He was 7 days shy of reaching 6 months old.

advertisement - learn more

He was vaccinated for his first time April 5, 2012 and passed away April 10, 2012.  We thought we were doing the right thing and decided to hold off on his vaccinations until he was closer to 6 months old when the SIDS rate is supposedly lower.

Apparently we were very very wrong.

This took place in Texas. Bently’s death was ruled as SUUDS, ‘sudden unexplained unexpected death syndrome.’ It’s different from SIDS. The medical examiner stated that he found it ‘odd’ that he could not find a cause of death for my son.

I believe that was a cover up for the shots being blamed for what killed him. Nothing was reported to the appropriate places because they didn’t find the shots to be the sole cause of death. But my son was 100% healthy prior to the vaccinations.

I don’t believe it to be coincidence that he passed 5 days after the shots. I know they killed him.”

advertisement - learn more

 “The difference between Bently’s death and a drunk driving death, is that in the case of vaccines – the one who commits the negligent homicide, signs the death certificate.” – Retired LAPD officer Clark Baker

Parents Told “Adverse Reactions Are Rare”

Bently - almost aged 6 months - died 5 days after 11 vaccinations were given to him. Doctors said 'not related to vaccines' Would they say that if Bently had swallowed 11 different types of prescription drugs?

Bently – almost aged 6 months – died 5 days after 11 vaccinations were given to him. Doctors said ‘not related to vaccines’ Would they say that if Bently had swallowed 11 different types of prescription drugs?

Alisa’s story about her son Bently is one of pure tragedy.

It seems obvious that the astronomical amount of vaccines given to him in one sitting was the cause of his sudden death, yet Bently’s doctor denied a connection. But a mother knows and can use common sense to ask herself, “what was different in the last few days that doesn’t normally happen in my child’s life?”

If you have ever asked your own doctor about how often adverse reactions occur, chances are they said something along the lines of, “Oh they’re very rare, in fact, probably about 1 in a million.”

But the problem with that answer is it simply does not seem to be true. There are far too many parents reporting injuries; VAERS and Medalerts – two online databases the public can use – are full of them.

Furthermore, most doctors are not explaining to people just how many adverse reactions can actually occur. And rarely does a doctor or nurse even show the vaccine insert to the patient, despite the fact that the list of possible reactions is lengthy, which is listed further on in this article.

When a child is injured, very rarely do our medical providers admit that the vaccine was the cause – and in fact they often emphatically deny it, even if a child had seizures for the first time in their life that very night .

If a patient doesn’t have a reaction within the standard waiting time of 15 minutes of having the injection ( in Bently’s case, the doctor didn’t even make Alisa wait at all), it seems as though doctors relinquish all responsibility, as though anything that happens after that time is ‘definitely’ unrelated to the vaccinations.

I shudder to think about all the different amounts of chemicals, live viruses, killed viruses, animal DNA, heavy metals and other chemicals were injected into Bently that day. The aluminum (a proven neurotoxin) for one, that Bently received on April 5th 2012 would have been astronomical.

Now that most thimeresol has been phased out of the majority of infant vaccines, they now have worrying levels of aluminium in them.

Christina England reported about the various levels of aluminum found in many infant vaccines today in her article titled: This Study Reveals Children are Being Vaccinated With Toxic Levels of Aluminium Causing Neurological Damage and Autism

  • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis): 170–625 mcg, depending on
    manufacturer
  • Hepatitis A: 250 mcg
  • Hepatitis B: 250 mcg
  • Hib (for meningitis; PedVaxHib brand only): 225 mcg
  • HPV: 225 mcg
  • Pediarix (DTaP–hepatitis B–polio combination): 850 mcg
  • Pentacel (DTaP–Hib–polio combination): 330 mcg
  • Pneumococcus: 125 mcg

Help Alisa Take Bentlys Case To Court

It’s clear from this list that Bently would have been given close to 2000mcg (perhaps even far more depending on the manufacturers ingredients) of Aluminum in one day.  And we haven’t even mentioned the other ingredients in those shots.  Alisa also thinks what happened to Bently is criminal and has set up a go fund me campaign to help her try and sue regarding what happened to her son.

Screen-Shot-2015-02-20-at-9.33.11-PM

Aluminum – Highly Toxic and Damaging To Infants

As you can see below Bently was also given the Dtap vaccine twice.

11078173_10205842904412994_7727955564391861741_o

Bently’s vaccine record from 5th April 2012 – Is this really ok for a child to receive all these vaccines at once? Where is the proof this is safe?

When babies ‘mysteriously’ die, it seems that autopsies do not cover testing for the ingredients found in vaccinations. Surely this is a crime?  If a child swallowed other prescription drugs wouldn’t that coroner then have to test for the drugs?  Why isn’t there a legal requirement to test for these vaccine ingredients?  Vaccines are also prescription drugs!

6461670_orig

A horrific story came out of California regarding an infant that was recently vaccinated. Vac Truth reported:

Parents in California are distraught after losing their infant son after being vaccinated. He died in his sleep and was taken to the hospital already deceased. Hospital staff ruled his death as sudden infant death syndrome. The couple was told an autopsy was required to be performed on their son.

After returning home, waiting to get an update, they never received one. Numerous phone calls were made to get answers. Weeks went by. Finally, they received verbal confirmation and told their son was best not to be seen prior to being cremated, because of the condition he was in. Once cremated, they could pick up the remains of their child from the crematory. They were not given the chance to say their goodbyes.

More than one year and four months have passed and the family has yet to receive his autopsy report. It turns out their son was given a vaccine not approved for his age and an extra dose of the hepatitis B vaccine that he shouldn’t have received until later on.

11078173_10205842904412994_7727955564391861741_o

Bently’s vaccine list.

VIC-balance-3.5billion-highlighted

Not so rare after all? At least 3 billion dollars have been paid out to victims of vaccine injury.

One in a Million Chance, Or Far Greater?

The standard “1 in a million” quote seems to be quite false anyway, even according to the CDC, who has said that serious allergic reactions can occur in “less than 100,000 doses.” That’s a far cry from one in a million.

I personally know hundreds of mothers who have vaccine injured children. Their stories are compelling, making a powerful case that the vaccines were the main trigger. But, most of them were all shot down by the medical community for vaccines being the cause.

11025180_10152618511681825_4082807840640753990_n

Vaccine Promoters Say Vaccines Are Safe Yet No Long Term Safety Studies Done

Doctors think vaccines are safer than regular prescription drugs. It’s because they have been taught that the ‘golden miracle’ in medicine was vaccinations and that the risk from them harming is so low that it’s not even worth discussing about with the patient.  They also believe statements like the one below.

This is what is typically found on vaccination-promoting websites such as Colorado’s organization immunizeforgood.com:

Vaccines undergo rigorous safety testing prior to being approved by the FDA and are continually monitored for safety. All vaccine ingredients are tested to be safe. Vaccines are also studied to be administered together, to work in conjunction to safely prompt your child’s immune system to build protection.

As someone who has spent years researching vaccines, these above statements are simply not true. There has never been a single study testing the safety of the current vaccine schedule.

“Rigorous Safety Testing”

Vaccine manufacturers study their new vaccine with another vaccine (instead of solely using a placebo such as saline solution like standard drug testing) that is more than likely not going to be as safe or as effective – making their new vaccine look better.  In the case of the HPV vaccine the other vaccine which was used as the placebo, was actually full of aluminum, so naturally the HPV vaccine appeared to be far safer than what they called their “placebo.”

It’s also very important to note that the vaccine manufacturers do their own “safety” studies. Many concerned about vaccine safety find this very disturbing. The sensible process would be to see vaccines being tested by independent bodies.  But that never happens.

”FDA approval”

The FDA are paid by the pharmaceutical companies to fast track medications such as vaccines.  Sometimes they approve vaccines (such as the ebola vaccine that is in the pipeline) which haven’t undergone any testing at all.

According to author Ethan Huff’s damning report titled, Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs, published in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics:

“The FDA is nothing more than a pay-for-play front group that caters strictly to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. Since drug companies are what primarily funds the FDA these days, the agency has lowered the barriers to entry for new drugs, speeding up the approval process while at the same time putting patients at increased risk.”

For more shocking information about the FDA please visit this link.

blaylockwakefield

”All Vaccine Ingredients Are Tested To Be Safe”

Again, this is simply not true.  Many ingredients such as formaldehyde, anti-freeze, aluminum, and thimerasol (don’t be fooled that it’s all gone – it’s  still used in some flu shots, tetanus, and some meningitis vaccines today) are proven to cause cancer (even the CDC says this, and children are more at risk, but they don’t mention vaccines in their formaldehyde report!) and neurological problems. There are also other harmful ingredients found in vaccines.

 

UKNews-40Deaths_600x456

Paid To Promote Vaccines & Gain Public’s Trust

The vaccine industry follows a strict business model, and that’s a fact. They employ the same strategies to gain more customers used in other commercial industries.

After doing a bit of research into Immunize for Good (linked above), I found this in their Strategic Plan (highly recommended reading).

This list below is a small fraction from the pdf documenting Colorado’s aims to:

  • vaccinate more children
  • distribute more pro-vaccination printed materials
  • get more blog hits
  • ensure that “paid media will reach at least 1 million impressions per year”
  • identify earned and paid media opportunities to promote CCIC, www.ImmunizeforGood.com and www.VacunalosporsuBien.com.
  • offer continuing education credits for health care professionals.

I find “strategic business plans” like the one above and also the Healthy People 2020 plan – a new “adult immunization program” – extremely concerning.

In all of these plans, there is nothing about improving actual safety of the vaccines to gain the public’s trust in wanting to use them!

c2b39a_4675a367b803455e86f787dc4cbf9552.png_srz_352_224_75_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_png_srz

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die (as categorized in the ICD), and one unofficial way for an infant to die: following an adverse reaction to one or more vaccines. When vaccine-related deaths are hidden within the death tables, parents are denied the ability to ascertain honest vaccine risk-to-benefit ratios, and true informed consent to vaccinations is not possible.

We Want To Hear From YOU

After noticing lots of stories from CE readers under the vaccination posts we publish, it’s made us wonder just how many of our readers have possibly been harmed by vaccines?

We therefore ask you to leave your stories and to share this post with other friends who have told you that they (or a member of their family) were also affected by a vaccination. We want you to leave the comments UNDER this article so that when parents are doing a search for vaccine injuries, they will come across this post and be able to decide for themselves – are adverse reactions from vaccines only occurring 1 in every million, 1 in every 100,000, or actually in far greater numbers?

Whilst some may think an adverse reaction can only consist of something serious, like convulsions or death, there are actually many other adverse reactions which have been documented.

10998403_10152548501426222_5185370824392438992_n

These are just some of the adverse reactions that can occur after receiving a vaccine:

  • Swelling at injection site
  • Rash
  • Fatigue
  • Headache
  • Nausea
  • Chills
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
  • Fever
  • Seizures
  • Autism
  • Guillaine-Barre Syndrome
  • Brain swelling
  • Shock
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Ataxia
  • Drowsiness
  • Insomnia
  • Narcolepsy
  • Myalgia
  • Arthralgia
  • Urticarial
  • Edema
  • Upper respiratory tract infection
  • Diarrhea
  • Paralysis
  • Infertility
  • Encephalitis
  • Miscarriage
  • Facial swelling
  • Death
  • Varicella zoster infection after vaccination
1620706_10152616480465916_11394634807649975_n

People are losing their rights to exemption rights – If SB277 comes in there will be only a small amount of medical reasons not to vaccinate.

Check Out VAERS Reporting System With Registered Deaths After Vaccines:

You’ve got to have a strong stomach to read this report, but I do urge you to check it out. The stories are horrific and there are pages and pages of them. Important to note, that these are only the reports about deaths.  There are thousands of more reported to VAERS about other life changing injuries.

Have you experienced an adverse reaction?

We’d love to find out what happened to you, a family member or your own children after receiving a vaccine.  Please tell us below or, you can also email stories directly at contact@collective-evolution.com

  • were you shown the vaccine insert
  • were you told about the possible risks
  • what age were you or the said person was
  • what vaccine(s) you were given
  • what happened afterwards and what the doctor or hospital’s response was

Thank you

Further reading:

http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/unvaccinated/Parents-of-Unvaccinated-Children/

 

If you’d like to learn a lot more about vaccines please watch Vaccines Revealed, a 9 part Documentary series

NOTE:

Please leave your story below this post.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Awareness

Cancer is Now the Leading Cause of Death

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Cancer has surpassed heart disease as the No. 1 cause of death in high-income countries, highlighting the urgent need to change the way this disease is prevented and treated.

  • Reflect On:

    Rather than being a random result of DNA mutations, it's possible that cancer could have much deeper roots that would be better targeted with natural therapies than toxicity.

This article was written by the Greenmedinfo Research Group, originally published by Greenmedinfo.com. Published here with permission. 

Cancer has dethroned heart disease to earn the nefarious title of leading cause of death in high-income and certain middle-income countries.[i] While heart disease remains the No. 1 cause of death globally among adults aged 35 to 70, in high-income countries, which included Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Canada and Sweden, cancer caused twice as many deaths as heart disease.[ii]

Some middle-income countries, which included the Philippines, Iran, South Africa, Colombia, China, Brazil, Malaysia, Turkey, Poland, Argentina and Chile, also saw cancer become the leading cause of death.

While the U.S. was not included in the new analysis, research published in 2018 suggested, “the United States is in the midst of an epidemiologic transition in the leading cause of death,” moving from heart disease to cancer.[iii]

That study, too, found that cancer was quickly outpacing heart disease as the top killer, with high-income counties transitioning first. In fact, while only 21% of U.S. counties had cancer as the leading cause of death in 2003, this rose to 41% in 2015.

“The shift to cancer as the leading cause of death was greatest in the highest-income counties,” the researchers explained,[iv] echoing the current study, which also cited “a transition in the predominant causes of deaths in middle-age” in high-income countries.[v]

advertisement - learn more

“The world is witnessing a new epidemiologic transition among the different categories of noncommunicable diseases, with CVD [cardiovascular disease] no longer the leading cause of death in HIC [high-income countries],” lead author Dr. Gilles Dagenais, professor emeritus, Laval University, Quebec, Canada, said in a statement.[vi]

Why is Cancer a Top Killer?

The study suggested cancer is rising to the top because heart disease is better treated in high-income countries, saving more lives from heart disease and paving the way for cancer deaths to flourish. But perhaps a better question is why cancer continues to kill so many.

Even globally, cancer still comes in as the second leading cause of death behind heart disease, responsible for 26% of deaths worldwide.[vii] In the U.S., Americans have a 1 in 3 risk of developing cancer at some point in their lifetimes, along with a 1 in 5 risk of dying from the disease.[viii]

In early 2019, it was announced that cancer death rates in the U.S. declined 27% since 1991,[ix] a statistic that makes it seem as though we’re winning the “war on cancer.” But most of these declines can be attributed to reductions in smoking — and perhaps a limited measure of increased early detection and treatment — and are not a sign that conventional medicine’s model of surgerychemotherapy and/or radiation to treat cancer is, on the whole, working.

While death rates from certain cancer have declined, others have increased. Overall, cancer deaths in the U.S. in 2016 were similar to those in 1930[x] — despite all the “advances” in detection and treatment.

Changing the Way We Think About Cancer

It’s becoming increasingly clear that in order to conquer cancer, it’s necessary to change the way we think about it. Cancer is found in virtually all animals, suggesting it has evolutionary significance.[xi] It’s possible that cancer is an ancient survival program unmasked — even a process the body undergoes in order to survive nutrient deprivation and exposure to toxins.

Rather than being the result of an accumulation of DNA mutations that create rogue cells that multiply out of control, cancer could be cells that have flipped an epigenetic switch into survival mode in the form of a tumor. In the journal Physical Biology, researchers theorized:[xii]

“[C]ancer is an atavistic [primitive] condition that occurs when genetic or epigenetic malfunction unlocks an ancient ‘toolkit’ of pre-existing adaptations, re-establishing the dominance of an earlier layer of genes that controlled loose-knit colonies of only partially differentiated cells, similar to tumors.”

If this is true, it makes sense that conventional cancer treatments aimed to poison or “kill” the cancerous cells may only make the problem worse by creating an even more toxic environment, which could trigger the cancer to reach back into its “ancient toolkit” to find additional means of survival.

This explanation may be overly simplistic, as there are many factors that contribute to cancer, but there is evidence to suggest that natural substances and therapies that support the body’s overall health can be useful in the fight against cancer.

Nearly 1,000 Natural Substances Have Anti-Cancer Potential

GreenMedInfo has a database of 986 substances that have been researched as potential cancer prevention and treatment strategies. There are undoubtedly many more out there that have yet to be discovered. At the top of the list is curcumin, the active ingredient in the curry spice turmeric, which targets cancer stem cells while leaving normal stem cells unharmed.[xiii]

Another top contender is vitamin D, which you can get for free from adequate sun exposure. Higher vitamin D levels are not only known to lower your cancer risk but also to improve outcomes if you’ve already been diagnosed.[xiv] Fiberresveratrolsulforaphane and vitamin E — all substances you can get from your diet — also show anti-cancer promise, as does coffee, perhaps because it improves the body’s ability to efficiently repair DNA damage.[xv]

So if there was one silver lining to the news that cancer is now the leading cause of death in some countries, it would be that it’s a condition that has many promising natural avenues for prevention and treatment. Current conventional cancer treatments are failing, but that doesn’t mean cancer is unstoppable — it means it’s time to broaden our research into and usage of traditional therapies.

Many natural substances, like noni leaf,[xvi] have even been shown to work better than chemotherapy, highlighting why, if we’re going to win the war against cancer, we’re going to need to do it with nature on our side.

For more on how to naturally fight Cancer, visit the GreenMedInfo database on the subject.

Originally published: 2019-09-14

Article Updated: 2019-11-05

References

[i] The Lancet September 3, 2019

[ii] CNN September 3, 2019

[iii] Annals of Internal Medicine December 18, 2018

[iv] Annals of Internal Medicine December 18, 2018

[v] The Lancet September 3, 2019

[vi] Medscape September 3, 2019

[vii] Medscape September 3, 2019

[viii] American Cancer Society, Lifetime Risk of Developing or Dying From Cancer

[ix] CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians January 8, 2019

[x] CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians January 8, 2019

[xi] Front. Oncol., 10 January 2019

[xii] Physical Biology February 7, 2011

[xiii] Anticancer Res. 2015 Feb ;35(2):599-614.

[xiv] Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 16. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

[xv] J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2015 ;8(4-6):174-84.

[xvi] Mol Cell Biochem. 2016 Apr 22. Epub 2016 Apr 22.


For more info from Greenmedinfo, you can join their newsletter by clicking here.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Awareness

Man Fasts For 382 Days Straight & Loses 276 Pounds

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Angus Barbieri, a man who, in June of 1965, began a fast under medical supervision for exactly 382 days. He remained completely healthy for the duration of the fast.

  • Reflect On:

    Today, it's firmly established in scientific literature that fasting can have tremendous benefits, if done correctly. It can also be used to treat a variety of diseases. Perhaps it's not emphasized because you can't make money off of not eating?

A study published in the Post Graduate Medical Journal in 1972 brought more attention to a gentleman by the name of Angus Barbieri, a man who, in June of 1965, began a fast under medical supervision for exactly 382 days and, at the time the study was published, had since maintained his ordinary weight. In his case, “prolonged fasting had no ill effects.” Barbieri’s weight decreased from 456 to 180 pounds during the fast.

This isn’t the only example that’s available in the literature, it’s similar to an earlier patient prior to Barbieri who reduced his weight from 432 to 235 pounds during 350 days of intermittent fasting (Stewart, Fleming & Robertson, 1966). Researchers have also fasted patients for 256 days (Collison, 1967, 1971), 249 and 236 days (Thomson et al., 1966) as well as  210 days (Garnett et al., 1969; Runcie & Thomson, 1970), all of which are cited in the 1972 study.

Since the publication of this time, there are many documented examples of prolonged fasting done by highly obese people. Here’s one recent example of a man who fasted for 50 straight days, while being medically supervised and tested the whole time.

When you fast, your body switches from burning glucose, to burning fat. Fasting lowers insulin levels which allows the body to access its fat stores for energy. When you eat, food is converted into glucose and that’s what we usually burn. This is why fasting has become a therapeutic intervention for many people with type two diabetes, and more doctors, like Dr. Jason Fung, a Toronto Based nephrologist, are having great success with utilizing fasting as an appropriate and necessary health intervention. Fung has many great articles regarding the science of fasting, you can access them here if you’re interested in learning more. This article references some of the leading scientists in the field so you can learn more by looking them up as well.

The graph below depicts what happens to your protein while fasting. Interesting isn’t it? People often believe that if you fast, you will experience a tremendous amount of muscle loss during fasting, but that’s simply not true. This graph is from Kevin Hall, from the NIH in the book “Comparative Physiology of Fasting, Starvation, and Food Limitation.”

“It seems that there are always concerns about loss of muscle mass during fasting. I never get away from this question. No matter how many times I answer it, somebody always asks, “Doesn’t fasting burn your muscle?” Let me say straight up, NO.”  – source Dr. Jason Fung

advertisement - learn more

But what about Angus Barbieri? Obviously we’re not saying long term fasts for this long are healthy, obviously for many people they will probably be unhealthy and unsafe unless medically supervised. In  the 1972 study doctors measured a number of concentrations within the body. For example, plasma potassium concentrations over the first four months decreased systematically. As a result, they provided a very small daily dose that increased his potassium level. After another 10 weeks, no potassium was given, and from there on in until the end of the fast, plasma potassium levels remained normal. Cholesterol concentrations also remained around 230 mg/ 100 ml until 300 days of fasting, but increased to 370 mg/100 ml during refeeding.

Plasma magnesium levels decreased over the first few weeks of the fast but then went up and stabilized. This is interesting to note as there is nothing going into the body, yet levels still stabilized after the initial decrease.

Normal plasma magnesium concentrations, despite magnesium ‘depletion’ in muscle tissue, have been described (Drenick et al., 1969) during short-term fasting (1-3 months). The only other relevant report is a remark (Runcie & Thomson, 1970) that one patient who fasted 71 days had a normal plasma magnesium level of 2-2 mEq/l at the time when she developed latent tetany. The decrease in the plasma magnesium concentration of our patient was systematic and persistent.

Furthermore:

The excretion of sodium, potassium, calcium and inorganic phosphate decreased to low levels throughout the first 100 days, but thereafter the excretion of all four urinary constituents, as well as of magnesium, began to increase. During the subsequent 200 days sodium excretion, previously between 2 and 20 mEq daily, reached over 80 mEq/24 hr, potassium excretion increased to 30-40 mEq daily and calcium excretion increased from 10-30 mg/24 hr to 250- 280 mg/24 hr. Magnesium excretion (which was not measured during the first 100 days) reached 10 mEq/ 24 hr between Days 200-300. Phosphate excretion, which had decreased to under 200 mg/24 hr, also increased to around 800 mg/24 hr, even exceeding 1000 mg/24 hr on occasion. Peak excretions of all these constituents were seen around Day 300, after which there was a marginal decrease, but excretion remained high.

Obviously, this is an extreme fast and such fasts have only been tested on people of tremendous obesity, and it shows that people with a high body fat percentage have the ability to fast longer simply because their body has more stores to pull from.

The study concluded in 1972 that:

We have found, like Munro and colleagues (1970), that prolonged supervised therapeutic starvation of the obese patient can be a safe therapy, which is also effective if the ideal weight is reached. There is, however, likely to be occasionally a risk in some individuals, attributable to failures in different aspects of the adaptative response to fasting. Until the characteristics of these variations in response are identified, and shown to be capable of detection in their prodromal stages, extended starvation therapy must be used cautiously. In our view, unless unusual hypokalaemia is seen, potassium supplements are not mandatory. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (or uricosuric agents) are not always necessary and could even be potentially harmful (British Medical Journal, 1971) perhaps particularly in the long-term fasting situation.

It’s almost 2020, and the literature, studies and research that’s been published since 1972 is vast. We’ve learned a lot more about it and if done correctly it can be extremely beneficial. Shot term fasting  presents minimal to no health risks, and so does long term fasting that lasts more than 24 hours, that is unless a person already has an underlying condition. That being said, it’s not easy to start. Most people are used to eating three meals plus snacks every single day, therefore they are never adapted to burning their fat stores, something that appears the human body was meant to do.

“Why is it that the normal diet is three meals a day plus snacks? It isn’t that it’s the healthiest eating pattern, now that’s my opinion but I think there is a lot of evidence to support that. There are a lot of pressures to have that eating pattern, there’s a lot of money involved. The food industry — are they going to make money from skipping breakfast like I did today? No, they’re going to lose money. If people fast, the food industry loses money. What about the pharmaceutical industries? What if people do some intermittent fasting, exercise periodically and are very healthy, is the pharmaceutical industry going to make any money on healthy people?” – Mark Mattson (source)

Fasting has also been shown to be effective as a therapeutic intervention for cancer. Fasting protects healthy cells while ‘starving’ cancer cells, it’s now being used as an intervention that’s being combined with chemotherapy. Fasting has also been shown to greatly reduce the risk of age related diseases like Parkinson’s Disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Mark Mattson, one of the foremost researchers of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying multiple neurodegenerative disorders has shown through his work that fasting can have a tremendous effect on the brain, and can even reverse the symptoms of multiple neurodegenerative disorders. You can watch his interesting TED talk here.  Scientists have also discovered strong evidence that fasting is a natural intervention for triggering stem cell-based regeneration of an entire organ or system.

Fasting has actually long been known to have an effect on the brain. Children who suffer from epileptic seizures have fewer of them when placed on caloric restriction or fasts. It is believed that fasting helps kick-start protective measures that help counteract the overexcited signals that epileptic brains often exhibit.  (source)

The list goes on and is quite long. At the end of the day if you do your research, fasting, under proper medical supervision, can have tremendous health benefits that go far beyond what’s mentioned in the paragraph above. Every single study that has looked at fasting as a therapeutic intervention for several diseases has shown nothing but positive benefits. Even studies conducted regarding caloric restriction, something completely different than fasting, have shown promising results in all animal models.

According to a review of fasting literature conducted in 2003, “Calorie restriction (CR) extends life span and retards age-related chronic diseases in a variety of species, including rats, mice, fish, flies, worms, and yeast. The mechanism or mechanisms through which this occurs are unclear.” Since this study was published, a great amount of research has been conducted from many researchers, and the mechanisms are being discovered and have become more clear. If you want to further your research, apart from the names listed above, Dr. Valter Longo and his research is another great place to start.

The body has a tremendous amount of storage, and it hangs on to what it needs during a fast, and uses up ‘bad’ things, repairs damaged cells, and more. When you fast and deplete all your glycogen, your body is going to start using fat for energy, it’s going to use damaged cells for energy, it’s basically going to use all of the bad things first, before it gets to the good thing…Your body will not burn protein, as protein is not a fuel source while fasting.

I bring this up because it’s interesting to see what the body loses and hangs on to during a fast.

The Takeaway

The truth about fasting is that it’s not dangerous at all. Intermittent fasting and short term fasting can be done by just about anybody. From what we’ve seen with regards to prolonged fasting, it’s also not very dangerous when it comes to obese people doing it under medically supervised conditions. Theoretically, based on the science alone, any relatively healthy human being should be able to do a prolonged fast without any harmful consequences.

Obviously, prolonged fasts that are not medically supervised can be very detrimental. We are obviously not recommending this and you must do a lot of research and talk to your doctor if you’re interested in fasting, before trying it. For starters, a little bit of intermittent fasting here and there is a no brainer, and not dangerous at all if you have no underlying health conditions, but everybody’s body is different.

Fasting is making a lot of noise, and has been making a lot of noise within the health community, but it’s still not appropriately taught and used by the mainstream medical industry. Why is this so? The answer is simple, you can’t make money off of fasting.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Thousands Gather To Mark The 33rd Anniversary of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

Published

on

Government’s gift to Pharma of liability-free vaccines puts children’s health at risk states Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chairman, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Washington, DC – Thousands of advocates for children’s health will gather Thursday at the Vaccine Injury Epidemic (VIE) Event on the National Mall to mark the 33rd anniversary of National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). The rally on Nov. 14th will spotlight the devastating impact NCVIA has had upon the state of children’s health. While children continue to be injured by vaccines daily, vaccine makers cannot be held accountable, thereby eliminating incentive for vaccine safety.

In his remarks, RFK, Jr. will address the ramifications of NCVIA and honor those whose lives have been impacted by vaccine injury and death. “It’s time to call out Congress, the CDC, and drug companies for allowing industry profits to trump children’s health,” said Kennedy. “There is no crisis more urgent than the epidemics of chronic health conditions among our nation’s children.”

Following NCVIA’s passage creating the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), the childhood vaccine market sparked a gold rush for Pharma as more vaccines for routine childhood illnesses were developed. Coterminous with the burgeoning vaccine schedule, chronic health conditions in children rose from 12% to 54%. As vaccine industry profits grew to $50 billion annually, so did diagnoses of asthmaautismADHDallergiesanxietydepressiondiabetesobsessive-compulsive disorder and auto-immune diseases.  Here are the facts:

  • An HHS-funded study found only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported.
  • Despite NVICP’s high burden of proof and two out of three claims dismissed, over $4.2 billion has been paid for claims of vaccine injury or death.
  • The vaccine-injured find NVICP to be a years-long, litigious program with no jury, discovery and precedent. While medical bills mount, the injured are up against DOJ lawyers and HHS “Special Masters” that act as judges.
  • The Department of Justice and the NVICP are accused of fraud and obstruction of justice in the Autism Omnibus Proceeding.
  • The Institute of Medicine reports that the vaccine schedule as recommended has never been studied for long-term health effects despite independent research suggesting that unvaccinated children are healthier.
  • Modern medicine acknowledges that not everyone responds the same to vaccination and the “one size fits all” vaccine policy is not science based.

Children’s Health Defense’s created these six steps to vaccine safety. RFK, Jr. interviews are available upon request.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

advertisement - learn more

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod

Censorship is hiding us from you.

Get breaking conscious news articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!