Connect with us

Awareness

Vaccine Injured: Were YOU “One In A Million?” Share Your Story

Published

on

“My name is Alisa Neathery. My beautiful son Bently Stratton passed away only 5 days after receiving 11 vaccinations in one visit. He was 7 days shy of reaching 6 months old.

advertisement - learn more

He was vaccinated for his first time April 5, 2012 and passed away April 10, 2012.  We thought we were doing the right thing and decided to hold off on his vaccinations until he was closer to 6 months old when the SIDS rate is supposedly lower.

Apparently we were very very wrong.

This took place in Texas. Bently’s death was ruled as SUUDS, ‘sudden unexplained unexpected death syndrome.’ It’s different from SIDS. The medical examiner stated that he found it ‘odd’ that he could not find a cause of death for my son.

I believe that was a cover up for the shots being blamed for what killed him. Nothing was reported to the appropriate places because they didn’t find the shots to be the sole cause of death. But my son was 100% healthy prior to the vaccinations.

I don’t believe it to be coincidence that he passed 5 days after the shots. I know they killed him.”

advertisement - learn more

 “The difference between Bently’s death and a drunk driving death, is that in the case of vaccines – the one who commits the negligent homicide, signs the death certificate.” – Retired LAPD officer Clark Baker

Parents Told “Adverse Reactions Are Rare”

Bently - almost aged 6 months - died 5 days after 11 vaccinations were given to him. Doctors said 'not related to vaccines' Would they say that if Bently had swallowed 11 different types of prescription drugs?

Bently – almost aged 6 months – died 5 days after 11 vaccinations were given to him. Doctors said ‘not related to vaccines’ Would they say that if Bently had swallowed 11 different types of prescription drugs?

Alisa’s story about her son Bently is one of pure tragedy.

It seems obvious that the astronomical amount of vaccines given to him in one sitting was the cause of his sudden death, yet Bently’s doctor denied a connection. But a mother knows and can use common sense to ask herself, “what was different in the last few days that doesn’t normally happen in my child’s life?”

If you have ever asked your own doctor about how often adverse reactions occur, chances are they said something along the lines of, “Oh they’re very rare, in fact, probably about 1 in a million.”

But the problem with that answer is it simply does not seem to be true. There are far too many parents reporting injuries; VAERS and Medalerts – two online databases the public can use – are full of them.

Furthermore, most doctors are not explaining to people just how many adverse reactions can actually occur. And rarely does a doctor or nurse even show the vaccine insert to the patient, despite the fact that the list of possible reactions is lengthy, which is listed further on in this article.

When a child is injured, very rarely do our medical providers admit that the vaccine was the cause – and in fact they often emphatically deny it, even if a child had seizures for the first time in their life that very night .

If a patient doesn’t have a reaction within the standard waiting time of 15 minutes of having the injection ( in Bently’s case, the doctor didn’t even make Alisa wait at all), it seems as though doctors relinquish all responsibility, as though anything that happens after that time is ‘definitely’ unrelated to the vaccinations.

I shudder to think about all the different amounts of chemicals, live viruses, killed viruses, animal DNA, heavy metals and other chemicals were injected into Bently that day. The aluminum (a proven neurotoxin) for one, that Bently received on April 5th 2012 would have been astronomical.

Now that most thimeresol has been phased out of the majority of infant vaccines, they now have worrying levels of aluminium in them.

Christina England reported about the various levels of aluminum found in many infant vaccines today in her article titled: This Study Reveals Children are Being Vaccinated With Toxic Levels of Aluminium Causing Neurological Damage and Autism

  • DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis): 170–625 mcg, depending on
    manufacturer
  • Hepatitis A: 250 mcg
  • Hepatitis B: 250 mcg
  • Hib (for meningitis; PedVaxHib brand only): 225 mcg
  • HPV: 225 mcg
  • Pediarix (DTaP–hepatitis B–polio combination): 850 mcg
  • Pentacel (DTaP–Hib–polio combination): 330 mcg
  • Pneumococcus: 125 mcg

Help Alisa Take Bentlys Case To Court

It’s clear from this list that Bently would have been given close to 2000mcg (perhaps even far more depending on the manufacturers ingredients) of Aluminum in one day.  And we haven’t even mentioned the other ingredients in those shots.  Alisa also thinks what happened to Bently is criminal and has set up a go fund me campaign to help her try and sue regarding what happened to her son.

Screen-Shot-2015-02-20-at-9.33.11-PM

Aluminum – Highly Toxic and Damaging To Infants

As you can see below Bently was also given the Dtap vaccine twice.

11078173_10205842904412994_7727955564391861741_o

Bently’s vaccine record from 5th April 2012 – Is this really ok for a child to receive all these vaccines at once? Where is the proof this is safe?

When babies ‘mysteriously’ die, it seems that autopsies do not cover testing for the ingredients found in vaccinations. Surely this is a crime?  If a child swallowed other prescription drugs wouldn’t that coroner then have to test for the drugs?  Why isn’t there a legal requirement to test for these vaccine ingredients?  Vaccines are also prescription drugs!

6461670_orig

A horrific story came out of California regarding an infant that was recently vaccinated. Vac Truth reported:

Parents in California are distraught after losing their infant son after being vaccinated. He died in his sleep and was taken to the hospital already deceased. Hospital staff ruled his death as sudden infant death syndrome. The couple was told an autopsy was required to be performed on their son.

After returning home, waiting to get an update, they never received one. Numerous phone calls were made to get answers. Weeks went by. Finally, they received verbal confirmation and told their son was best not to be seen prior to being cremated, because of the condition he was in. Once cremated, they could pick up the remains of their child from the crematory. They were not given the chance to say their goodbyes.

More than one year and four months have passed and the family has yet to receive his autopsy report. It turns out their son was given a vaccine not approved for his age and an extra dose of the hepatitis B vaccine that he shouldn’t have received until later on.

11078173_10205842904412994_7727955564391861741_o

Bently’s vaccine list.

VIC-balance-3.5billion-highlighted

Not so rare after all? At least 3 billion dollars have been paid out to victims of vaccine injury.

One in a Million Chance, Or Far Greater?

The standard “1 in a million” quote seems to be quite false anyway, even according to the CDC, who has said that serious allergic reactions can occur in “less than 100,000 doses.” That’s a far cry from one in a million.

I personally know hundreds of mothers who have vaccine injured children. Their stories are compelling, making a powerful case that the vaccines were the main trigger. But, most of them were all shot down by the medical community for vaccines being the cause.

11025180_10152618511681825_4082807840640753990_n

Vaccine Promoters Say Vaccines Are Safe Yet No Long Term Safety Studies Done

Doctors think vaccines are safer than regular prescription drugs. It’s because they have been taught that the ‘golden miracle’ in medicine was vaccinations and that the risk from them harming is so low that it’s not even worth discussing about with the patient.  They also believe statements like the one below.

This is what is typically found on vaccination-promoting websites such as Colorado’s organization immunizeforgood.com:

Vaccines undergo rigorous safety testing prior to being approved by the FDA and are continually monitored for safety. All vaccine ingredients are tested to be safe. Vaccines are also studied to be administered together, to work in conjunction to safely prompt your child’s immune system to build protection.

As someone who has spent years researching vaccines, these above statements are simply not true. There has never been a single study testing the safety of the current vaccine schedule.

“Rigorous Safety Testing”

Vaccine manufacturers study their new vaccine with another vaccine (instead of solely using a placebo such as saline solution like standard drug testing) that is more than likely not going to be as safe or as effective – making their new vaccine look better.  In the case of the HPV vaccine the other vaccine which was used as the placebo, was actually full of aluminum, so naturally the HPV vaccine appeared to be far safer than what they called their “placebo.”

It’s also very important to note that the vaccine manufacturers do their own “safety” studies. Many concerned about vaccine safety find this very disturbing. The sensible process would be to see vaccines being tested by independent bodies.  But that never happens.

”FDA approval”

The FDA are paid by the pharmaceutical companies to fast track medications such as vaccines.  Sometimes they approve vaccines (such as the ebola vaccine that is in the pipeline) which haven’t undergone any testing at all.

According to author Ethan Huff’s damning report titled, Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs, published in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics:

“The FDA is nothing more than a pay-for-play front group that caters strictly to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. Since drug companies are what primarily funds the FDA these days, the agency has lowered the barriers to entry for new drugs, speeding up the approval process while at the same time putting patients at increased risk.”

For more shocking information about the FDA please visit this link.

blaylockwakefield

”All Vaccine Ingredients Are Tested To Be Safe”

Again, this is simply not true.  Many ingredients such as formaldehyde, anti-freeze, aluminum, and thimerasol (don’t be fooled that it’s all gone – it’s  still used in some flu shots, tetanus, and some meningitis vaccines today) are proven to cause cancer (even the CDC says this, and children are more at risk, but they don’t mention vaccines in their formaldehyde report!) and neurological problems. There are also other harmful ingredients found in vaccines.

 

UKNews-40Deaths_600x456

Paid To Promote Vaccines & Gain Public’s Trust

The vaccine industry follows a strict business model, and that’s a fact. They employ the same strategies to gain more customers used in other commercial industries.

After doing a bit of research into Immunize for Good (linked above), I found this in their Strategic Plan (highly recommended reading).

This list below is a small fraction from the pdf documenting Colorado’s aims to:

  • vaccinate more children
  • distribute more pro-vaccination printed materials
  • get more blog hits
  • ensure that “paid media will reach at least 1 million impressions per year”
  • identify earned and paid media opportunities to promote CCIC, www.ImmunizeforGood.com and www.VacunalosporsuBien.com.
  • offer continuing education credits for health care professionals.

I find “strategic business plans” like the one above and also the Healthy People 2020 plan – a new “adult immunization program” – extremely concerning.

In all of these plans, there is nothing about improving actual safety of the vaccines to gain the public’s trust in wanting to use them!

c2b39a_4675a367b803455e86f787dc4cbf9552.png_srz_352_224_75_22_0.50_1.20_0.00_png_srz

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die (as categorized in the ICD), and one unofficial way for an infant to die: following an adverse reaction to one or more vaccines. When vaccine-related deaths are hidden within the death tables, parents are denied the ability to ascertain honest vaccine risk-to-benefit ratios, and true informed consent to vaccinations is not possible.

We Want To Hear From YOU

After noticing lots of stories from CE readers under the vaccination posts we publish, it’s made us wonder just how many of our readers have possibly been harmed by vaccines?

We therefore ask you to leave your stories and to share this post with other friends who have told you that they (or a member of their family) were also affected by a vaccination. We want you to leave the comments UNDER this article so that when parents are doing a search for vaccine injuries, they will come across this post and be able to decide for themselves – are adverse reactions from vaccines only occurring 1 in every million, 1 in every 100,000, or actually in far greater numbers?

Whilst some may think an adverse reaction can only consist of something serious, like convulsions or death, there are actually many other adverse reactions which have been documented.

10998403_10152548501426222_5185370824392438992_n

These are just some of the adverse reactions that can occur after receiving a vaccine:

  • Swelling at injection site
  • Rash
  • Fatigue
  • Headache
  • Nausea
  • Chills
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
  • Fever
  • Seizures
  • Autism
  • Guillaine-Barre Syndrome
  • Brain swelling
  • Shock
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Ataxia
  • Drowsiness
  • Insomnia
  • Narcolepsy
  • Myalgia
  • Arthralgia
  • Urticarial
  • Edema
  • Upper respiratory tract infection
  • Diarrhea
  • Paralysis
  • Infertility
  • Encephalitis
  • Miscarriage
  • Facial swelling
  • Death
  • Varicella zoster infection after vaccination
1620706_10152616480465916_11394634807649975_n

People are losing their rights to exemption rights – If SB277 comes in there will be only a small amount of medical reasons not to vaccinate.

Check Out VAERS Reporting System With Registered Deaths After Vaccines:

You’ve got to have a strong stomach to read this report, but I do urge you to check it out. The stories are horrific and there are pages and pages of them. Important to note, that these are only the reports about deaths.  There are thousands of more reported to VAERS about other life changing injuries.

Have you experienced an adverse reaction?

We’d love to find out what happened to you, a family member or your own children after receiving a vaccine.  Please tell us below or, you can also email stories directly at contact@collective-evolution.com

  • were you shown the vaccine insert
  • were you told about the possible risks
  • what age were you or the said person was
  • what vaccine(s) you were given
  • what happened afterwards and what the doctor or hospital’s response was

Thank you

Further reading:

http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/unvaccinated/Parents-of-Unvaccinated-Children/

 

If you’d like to learn a lot more about vaccines please watch Vaccines Revealed, a 9 part Documentary series

NOTE:

Please leave your story below this post.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Awareness

Glyphosate & Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    This article was written by By Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, President of Children’s Health Defense.

  • Reflect On:

    How did our federal health regulatory agencies ever approve something so dangerous and damaging to human health?

In Part I, “The Disturbing Increase in Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults,” we called attention to the steep rise in colorectal cancer incidence in young people in their twenties and thirties and discussed the risks associated with viral vaccines. In Part II, we discuss glyphosate as another plausible culprit in the colorectal cancer epidemic.

Gut bacteria play a pivotal role in shoring up brain health and overall health. This fact has become a widely acknowledged talking point in scientific circles as well as in the popular press. The reverse is also true—when diet or environmental factors produce gut dysbiosis (an imbalance of the microbes that reside in the gastrointestinal tract), the imbalance can “impact the pathologies of many diseases.”

Colorectal cancer has increased by 51% in Americans under age 50 since the mid-1990s, and researchers suggest that “early life exposures…may be contributing to the rise” in that age group. A leading hypothesis is that gut dysbiosis is playing an active part—perhaps by disrupting young people’s immune response and triggering overactivation of cell signaling proteins in the colon. Some researchers have even posited a “bidirectional self-feeding relationship” between the gut microbiome and colorectal cancer, with gut dysbiosis contributing to colorectal cancer growth and progression, and tumor growth in turn disturbing the gut microbiome.

Autism investigators have been at the forefront of research on the gut microbiome. They point to environmental toxins and antibiotic use as two influences that can shift the gut’s microbial composition in an unfavorable direction. Scientists attribute up to 85% of colorectal cancers to environmental and microbial factors. Glyphosate (the leading ingredient of Roundup) is both an herbicide and a patented antimicrobial. Could the upward trend in glyphosate usage that began roughly three decades ago have something to do, therefore, with the skyrocketing incidence of colorectal cancer in young people? Although recent court cases linking Roundup to cancer have focused mostly on other types of cancer such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the evidence that glyphosate wreaks havoc with gut bacteria has led many researchers to suspect that the answer is yes.

Glyphosate in the air and everywhere

These days, glyphosate exposure affects everyone, not just farmworkers. Newsweek reported in 2016 that the world is “awash in glyphosate,” with a fifteen-fold increase in Roundup use since the mid-1990s. American agriculture sprays glyphosate on at least 70 food crops. As a result, glyphosate residues are now rampant in the U.S. food supply, including in the processed Cheerios, Doritos and Oreos so frequently gobbled up by children and adolescents.

Studies have documented concerning levels of glyphosate in Americans’ urine and breastmilk. One study of U.S. adults found that average glyphosate levels in urine increased by a factor of thirteen over the two-decade period between 1993–1996 and 2014–2016—and seven out of ten study participants had glyphosate levels above the limits of detection. Mean levels of a glyphosate metabolite called AMPA measured approximately 36 times higher in the second time period. Moms Across America has reported high levels of glyphosate in three out of ten breastmilk samples tested.

advertisement - learn more

Glyphosate and the gut

A variety of in-progress clinical trials are exploring the link between the intestinal microbiota and colorectal cancer. Completed studies have already shown that individuals with colorectal cancer “display instability in the composition of their gut bacterial communities when compared with healthy controls” and have elevated levels of unfavorable bacterial species. Several of these species exhibit “pro-inflammatory and pro-carcinogenic properties, which could consequently have an impact on colorectal carcinogenesis.” In fact, researchers suggest that measurement of these out-of-whack bacterial populations could have “potential value as a marker of colon cancer.”

The widespread and intensive use of glyphosate has exacerbated “distortions in microbial communities.” Researchers note that:

Shifts in microbial compositions due to selective pressure by glyphosate may have contributed to the proliferation of plant and animal pathogens. …[W]e hypothesize that the selection pressure for glyphosate-resistance in bacteria could lead to shifts in microbiome composition and increases in antibiotic resistance to clinically important antimicrobial agents.

Researchers Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff have written extensively about glyphosate in a series of papers elucidating “pathways to modern diseases.” They note that in animals, glyphosate “has been shown to disrupt gut bacteria…, preferentially killing beneficial forms and causing an overgrowth of pathogens.” Overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens can lead to a breakdown of the gut lining and the development of “leaky gut” syndrome. Researchers describe “the loss of gut barrier integrity” as “an early event which contributes to chronic inflammation,” and they have observed both gut dysbiosis and a dysfunctional intestinal barrier in colorectal cancer patients.

Turning a blind eye

Far from sticking up for American consumers, U.S. regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have largely turned a blind eye to concerns about glyphosate safety. The environmental website EcoWatch reported in 2016 that although the FDA routinely tests foods for pesticide residues, it had never tested for glyphosate residues until that year; EPA critics believe that the agency “has been unduly influenced by the agrichemical industry.” EcoWatch also observed that U.S. regulators allow a much higher “acceptable daily intake” of glyphosate than is permitted in other countries.

In July, 2019, Children’s Health Defense filed a lawsuit against Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, asserting that the company’s labeling and marketing practices “deceive parents who seek to be mindful of what is contained in the baby foods they provide to their infants.” Independent laboratory testing identified multiple synthetic pesticides, including glyphosate, in Beech-Nut’s “Naturals” line of baby food. Children’s Health Defense and Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. take the health of our most precious resource—our children—very seriously and are at the forefront of legal efforts to challenge fraud and free children from exposure to toxic chemicals.

The rising toll of colorectal cancer deaths in young people who are in the prime of life points to the urgent need to reset regulatory priorities and put people before profits. Glyphosate’s deleterious effects on the gut microbiome—just one of many problems associated with the herbicide—are one more nail in the coffin for a toxic product that is well past its use-by date.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Awareness

Johnson & Johnson Found To Have Knowingly Allowed Asbestos In Their Baby Powder

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Johnson and Johnson have recently lost lawsuits for negligence in knowingly allowing carcinogenic substances in their talc-based hygiene products.

  • Reflect On:

    Are we starting to turn the page on an era where human health and safety are not the prime considerations in the manufacturing of consumer products?

We are starting to awaken to the fact that it seems to be the rule, and not the exception, that large Western corporations put profits above human health considerations. The only time they seem to give any regard to human health concerns is when their forecasts of potential lawsuits down the road would likely exceed the cost measures needed to ensure the safety of their product.

Johnson & Johnson is just one of a long line of corporate perpetrators who believed that covering up and lying about known health concerns would make better business sense than taking the time and resources to actually address those health concerns within their products.

Contaminated Baby Powder: The Height Of Indignity

One would think, regardless of an understanding that the bottom line is a priority for most private companies, that the health and safety of a nursing mother and her newborn child would be sacrosanct for any industry. The reality is that this is simply not the case, even though J&J could have mitigated this problem from the start.

Companies that mine talc are required to take extra steps to ensure the absence of asbestos in their talc. Instead, J&J allegedly went to great lengths to fake it.

Not only did the company know about the asbestos contamination, evidence suggests, but J&J also failed to warn its customers about the link between Baby Powder and cancer or replace its talc with a safer alternative. As a result, J&J guaranteed its customers’ exposure to asbestos.

And regardless of their size or numbers, asbestos fibers are lethal at any capacity. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has stressed repeatedly, there is no safe level of exposure. (source)

advertisement - learn more

The Testimony of Scientist James Webber

Baby Powder’s contamination with asbestos (a mineral that naturally occurs near talc) has long been the subject of lawsuits. But only in recent years has evidence begun to unravel J&J’s defense – that the company had no idea – and threatened its success in lawsuits to come.

In March, a California jury awarded $29 million to Terry Leavitt, a woman who said that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum-powder-based products caused her terminal mesothelioma. Environmental scientist James Webber testified in her high-profile California trial and made these observations:

During several hours on the stand, Webber explained how he ran tests that showed “clear” evidence of asbestos contamination in the mines from which J&J sourced talc.

“The testing I have seen [shows] that it was present at least as early as 1971 and up through the late 1990s,” said Webber, who ran an asbestos laboratory in New York state.

Despite denying it publicly, J&J had observed this contamination in internal memos. Its notes dismissed the amount of asbestos in its talc as “but a trace,” Webber alleged. But that was just an optimistic interpretation of superficial testing, he said: the tests used methods too weak to detect microscopic asbestos fibers. Webber insisted the actual tests results revealed there could be millions of asbestos fibers per gram of talc.

And J&J’s inaccurate reports were allegedly only the tip of the iceberg. In some instances, Webber said, photos attached to J&J’s reports revealed that “they had been seeing it and not reporting it.”  (source)

And It’s Getting Worse

The $29 million verdict, in California Superior Court in Oakland, was the latest defeat for the healthcare conglomerate facing more than 13,000 talc-related lawsuits nationwide. And things may be getting even worse for J&J, according to ZeroHedge:

Johnson & Johnson shares are down over 5% after Bloomberg reports that, according to people with knowledge of the matter, the U.S. Justice Department is pursuing a criminal investigation into whether Johnson & Johnson lied to the public about the possible cancer risks of its talcum powder…

Now, a grand jury in Washington is examining documents related to what company officials knew about any carcinogens in their products, the people said.

The Takeaway

It seems as though corporations have long been willing to take the calculated risk of short-cuts and denials instead of ensuring that their products are safe for public use. My suspicion is that a part of our collective awakening process will be issuing in a new business paradigm in which human health and safety become paramount.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Awareness

Prescription Infant Formulas Found To Be Contaminated With Aluminum

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Multiple brands of prescription infant formula were found to contain high levels of aluminum.

  • Reflect On:

    Should we be questioning the quality of products that come from pharmaceutical production? Do we veer away from natural methods of raising children more than we should? At what cost?

You may not think aluminum is a big deal, but it is. For anybody who has looked into aluminum toxicology, it’s quite clear and apparent that it has no place inside of any living biological organism. Putting it simply, it wreaks havoc on our biology. High amounts of aluminum have been found in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease, with experts in the field believing that aluminum brain accumulation may be one of the main causes of Alzheimer’s disease.

It’s also been discovered within the brains of MS patients, and some of the highest aluminum content ever recorded in brain tissue has also been discovered in people with autism. Aluminum is associated with several diseases. But an adult body can do a great job of flushing out aluminum.

Despite the fact that aluminum has no place within earth’s biota, it’s still present in many of our medications, our food, and even in the water that we drink due to contamination since the industrial revolution. Aluminum inside the body is a new phenomenon and still understudied. Again, there is a threshold, and aluminum that is injected via vaccines doesn’t exit the body–there is strong evidence that it remains inside the body and ends up in distant organs and eventually inside of the brain. If you want to access more studies on that topic, you can read this article I published that provides them and goes into more detail. You can also watch this interview with Christopher Exley, where he also points to that fact.

A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has shown that multiple popular infant prescriptions are contaminated with aluminum. You may be asking how much aluminum, but the authors make it a point to stress that there are no safe amounts of aluminum levels that can be inside of a human body, let alone a newborn baby. That being said, the amounts found are listed within the abstract of the study:

Historical and recent data demonstrate that off-the-shelf infant formulas are heavily contaminated with aluminium. The origin of this contamination remains to be elucidated though may be imported via ingredients, packaging and processing. Specialised infant formulas exist to address health issues, such as low birth weight, allergy or intolerance and medical conditions, such as renal insufficiency. The aluminium content of these prescription infant formulas is measured here for the first time. We obtained 24 prescription infant formulas through a paediatric clinic and measured their total aluminium content by transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry following microwave assisted acid/peroxide digestion. The aluminium content of ready-to-drink formulas ranged from 49.9 (33.7) to 1956.3 (111.0) μg/L. The most heavily contaminated products were those designed as nutritional supplements for infants struggling to gain weight. The aluminium content of powdered formulas ranged from 0.27 (0.04) to 3.27 (0.19) μg/g. The most heavily contaminated products tended to be those addressing allergies and intolerance. Prescription infant formulas are contaminated with aluminium.

Another very important point made right off the bat by the authors:

advertisement - learn more

Human exposure to aluminium is a serious health concern. Aluminium exposure in infants is understandably a burgeoning issue. While infant exposure to aluminium continues to be documented, its consequences, immediate and in the future, have received only scant attention and research is required to understand the biological availability of aluminium through formula feeding. For example, how much aluminium is absorbed across the neonate gut and its subsequent fate, including excretion.

There is already too much aluminium in infant formulas and herein we have measured its content in a large number of prescription formulas, products which are fed to vulnerable infants in their first months of life. Many of these products are heavily contaminated with aluminium.

As for the specific infant formulas, you can refer to the study. The researchers obtained 24 prescription infant formulas via the Paediatric Clinic of Russells Hall Hospital in Dudley, United Kingdom. The ready-to-drink and powdered products were new, ready-to-be used and unopened samples. These formulas are for babies with some sort of growth restriction, like for preterm infants or infants who have poor weight gain. There were also powdered formulas for allergies and intolerances and powdered formulas with additional amino acids.

The authors contacted each manufacturer and expressed that they denied knowing that there was any aluminum in their products, which means it’s still a mystery as to their source. The authors hypothesize on a number of ways that aluminum could be entering into the formulas.

In their conclusion, the authors emphasize that:

Where possible, breast milk feeding should be prioritised, as the aluminium content of breast milk is invariably an order of magnitude lower than in formula feeds. Where infant formulas are the only source of nutrition for many infants in their first weeks and months of life, aluminium ingested in formula feeds will be the major contributor to their body burden of aluminium. The last thing that vulnerable infants fed specialised formulas for their specific nutritional/medicinal need is additional aluminium in their diet.

Detoxing

There is a lot of information out there on how a person can detox from aluminum and other heavy metals. There are multiple studies, and based on what I’ve looked into, water with high amounts of Silica are effective in draining aluminum out of your body and brain. Herbs like cilantro and substances like chlorella and spirulina are also great for removing some metals. The information is out there, so be sure to do your research.

The Takeaway

It’s concerning to think about what these corporations are doing. Again, aluminum should hold no place in our society, it should’ve remained well below our surface as part of the Earth’s crust for a reason. It wasn’t until humans began digging it out and using it for a number of things, irresponsibly I might add, that we started to see the health implications which still go largely ignored by the medical community.

In fact, heavy metal accumulation and detoxification of aluminum haven’t been addressed at all, which is odd given the fact that heavy metal accumulation is linked to a variety of diseases.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod

Censorship is hiding us from you.

Get breaking conscious news articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!