Connect with us

General

Giant Study Finds New Blood Test That Can Predict Breast Cancer Five Years Before It Develops

Published

on

A major study has found that a simple blood test could be more useful than mammograms by predicting breast cancer up to five years before it even develops. (source)(source)

advertisement - learn more

The world is in desperate need of a new way to detect breast cancer. Why? Because there is a wealth of scientific data concluding that mammograms are not, as the CDC claims, the most effective method of doing so. In fact, having a mammogram is likely the last thing you want to do if you have breast cancer. There has been a growing concern with women receiving these mammograms despite not being particularly effective, often leading to “false positives” in many cases. A recent study involving 13,000 women found that screening for breast cancer using mammography misses thousands of cases of breast cancer a year, and what’s even more alarming is the fact that other women have been diagnosed with the disease when they don’t even have it. It’s actually quite a serious problem that many people aren’t aware of, and experts have even suggested that the procedure itself can cause breast cancer, or worsen an already existing case. You can find out why, and more about that topic HERE.

Researchers at the University of Copenhagen tracked 57,000 patients over a period of 20 years, taking blood samples from each and every one. Two groups of women were compared, all of whom were healthy at the beginning of the study, with half of them being diagnosed with breast cancer within seven years of providing their first blood sample. These samples were compared with the ones who remained healthy. (source)(source)

The researchers were able to predict with a staggering 80 percent accuracy which patients would be affected by breast cancer simply by looking at the metabolic profiles they built from the blood samples. Sure, this may not be 100 percent accurate, but it seems (so far) to be a much better option than mammograms. Early detection is key in fighting cancer.

According to Laura Donnelly at the Telegraph, who broke the story, the test works by “measuring all of the compounds in the blood to build a ‘metabolic profile’ of an individual, in order to detect changes in the way chemicals are processed, during a pre-cancerous stage.” (source)

“The method is better than mammography, which can only be used when the disease has already occurred.”  – Lead researcher, Professor Rasmus Bro to the Telegraph (source)

advertisement - learn more

It’s a concept that’s been used before, by Harvard University for example, to predict a person’s chances for developing different forms of cancer by looking for specific mutations. (source)

“The potential is we can detect a disease like breast cancer much earlier than today. This is important as it is easier to treat if you discover it early. In the long term, it will probably also be possible to use similar models to predict other diseases.” Prof Lars Ove Dragsted, a professor of biomedicine in the University’s Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (source)

Cancer Prevention

Today we are bombarded with the idea of donating constantly to cancer charities in the hopes of finding a cure, and there’s nothing wrong with this desire to help. What is concerning, however, is the fact that we are constantly emphasizing the search for a cure, with little to no attention being paid to cancer prevention. That being said, millions of people across the world seem to be losing their faith in cancer charities, and for good reason.

“Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud, and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.” – Linus Pauling, Ph.D, and two time Nobel Prize winner in chemistry (1901-1994). He is considered one of the most important scientists in history. (source)

Truth is, if a pharmaceutical company can patent and make money from a treatment, then that’s what we will get. It’s what we’ve always gotten from them. When it comes to cancer, we can expect a treatment that we have to keep using over and over again.

As for names like Rene Caisse, or Max Gerson, who have suggested supposed cures, they are made to look like complete fools by the American Medical Association

And in the prevention conversation, it’s never mentioned that the pesticides sprayed on our food have been linked to cancer (among other things), and studies have shown that when eating foods which have not been sprayed with pesticides, an adult body reduces their pesticide exposure by 90 percent. (source)(source) This is just one of many examples of our toxic environment.

There is a reason why cancer statistics are staggering and continue to rise exponentially. It is no longer a stroke of bad luck but a high probability – one which can be drastically lowered by changing your lifestyle. (source)

Things like aluminum in our deodorant and toxins in our cleaning products are never factored into the equation. And the reality of GMOs causing cancer in studies done on animals (read more about that here) is simply ignored.  This is why it’s important to do your research.

That being said, you can make better choices.

Another factor when it comes to cancer prevention is alternative treatments, which are on the rise today. For example, if we look at cannabis, a multitude of studies have clearly shown the anti-tumour effects of the plant for decades. Despite this fact, no clinical trials have ever been conducted. Ask yourself, why is that so? Similarly, according to  studies published  in Life Sciences, Cancer Letters and Anticancer Drugs, artemesinin, a derivative of the wormwood plant commonly used in Chinese medicine, can kill off cancer cells, and do it at a rate of 12,000 cancer cells for every healthy cell (you can read more about that here).

There seem to be dozens upon dozens of treatments which show great promise, and treatments which people have decided to use for themselves with great success, yet receive absolutely no attention from the medical industry.

One great example is Mykala Comstock, you can read more about her story here, and there are many of these stories now emerging.

Just a little something to think about.

Thanks for reading.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

A Child Sacrifice God Now On Display In Rome Raises Questions About Elite Pedophilia & Ritual Abuse

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Moloch is a Canaanite god in the Old Testament that's associated with human sacrifice, specifically the sacrifice of human children is now on display at the entrance to the Colosseum in Rome as part of a secular historical exhibition.

  • Reflect On:

    With all of the attention Jeffrey Epstein is getting, should there not be more awareness and attention on elite level child trafficking?

Moloch is a Canaanite god in the Old Testament that’s associated with human sacrifice, specifically the sacrifice of human children. Some scholars even believe that Moloch, of Molekh, is an invention or an attempt to conceal the possible fact that Judahite (Jehovah) worship of YHWH in the eight and seventh century B.C.E. also included child sacrifice.

This ”god’ is now in display at the entrance of the Colosseum in Rome as part of a secular historical exhibition. The exhibition is part of a larger exhibit that’s dedicated to Ancient Rome’s historic adversary, the city of Carthage, and it’s being displayed and organized by Parco Archeologico del Colosseo. The exhibition will run until March 29th, 2020.

“A reconstruction of the terrible deity Moloch, linked to Phoenician and Carthaginian religions and featured in the 1914 film Cabiria (directed by Giovanni Pastore and written by Gabriele D’Annunzio) will be stationed at the entrance to the Colosseum to welcome visitors to the exhibition,” stated a press release about the exhibit.

Multiple media outlets that cover these types of topics, like Life Site News, are reporting that Catholics are outraged that a representation of this pagan god sits outside a place where Christians were brutally tortured and killed.

“We were so excited the day we decided to go to the Colosseum,” Alexandra Clark told LifeSiteNews via email. She and her sister Tiffany were looking forward to visiting the site of Christian martyrdom.

“But the moment we got there the sight that greeted us was horrifying! Standing guard over the entrance was the colossal pagan statue of Moloch. It was placed in that prime spot so that everyone that entered into the Colosseum had to pass it,” she continued.

advertisement - learn more

“It was like they put Moloch there to mock the sacred place where the holy martyrs spilled their blood for the True Faith!”

It was customary in Carthage to burn children alive as offerings to this deity, who was also referred to as Baal and Cronus, or Saturn, the Roman god who apparently ate his own children.

One study in the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association explains:

The sacrificial offering has the function of protecting the sacrificer from the hostility of the deity. The hostility of the sacrificer is transformed by projection into the fear of persecution by the god. Older forms of sacrifice sought only to offer a substitute victim to draw the wrath of the god – usually a child, as in the biblical sacrifices to the Ammonite god Moloch. Sacrifice of this order is based on aggression and was often associated with worship of the dead.

Why are there Wikileaks documents that even mention Moloch being sent to and from Hillary Clinton?

Why Is This Relevant?

All of this is very relevant, especially given the fact that strange activity is being disclosed within the mainstream at a rapid pace. The Jeffrey Epstein case is a prime example, one that implicated many elite people in the act of pedophilia and the trafficking of children, like Prince Andrew for example, or Bill Clinton, among many others. This doesn’t mean that everybody associated with Epstein was involved in such activities, but when it comes to figures like Andrew and Clinton, a discussion about corroborating evidence implicating them in such acts can be had. The fact that people like this are not brought in for questioning goes to show just how connected to power and above the law they are.

Another great example would be the  NXIVM case, where multiple members were implicated in some shady activity. Billionaire Clare Bronfman was indicted on racketeering charges. These charges were connected to her role as “Operations Director” for NXIVM. Clare Bronfman is the daughter of Charles Bronfman, a Canadian/American businessman and philanthropist. A very powerful person.

Just like with the Epstein case, the Clinton’s are mentioned with regards to NXIVM as well.

The Rolling Stone reported:

“There are strange political connections as well. Mark Vicente, a documentary filmmaker and former high-ranking member of the group, testified at the trial of NXIVM head Keith Raniere that Clare Bronfman, the billionaire Seagram’s heiress and alleged benefactor of the organization, approached him and a few other members of the group to help her make a contribution to a Clinton campaign.” (source)

The truth is, there is evidence suggesting that these types of people are involved in activities that go far beyond the already horrid acts of child trafficking and pedophilia, but also ritualistic sacrifice.

A paper published in European Psychiatry titled The cremation of care ritual: Burning of effigies or human sacrifice murder? The importance of differentiating complex trauma from schizophrenia in extreme abuse settings” by Dr. Rainer Kurz, explains, a chartered occupational psychologist (Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at The University of Manchester. Master of Science (MSc) Industrial Psychology at The University of Hull)

In the wake of institutional abuse enquiries and the ‘unbelievable’ child abuse perpetrated by celebrities like Jimmy Saville and Ian Watkins, a ‘new reality’ is setting in that child abuse is pervasive and knows no limits. Reports of elaborate rituals with ‘mock’ human sacrifices at the highly secretive annual ‘Bohemian Grove’ summer festival point towards a pervasive interest in the occult in high society. Mental health professionals have a ‘duty of care’ towards their service users. Unless clear and irrefutable counter-evidence is available it is inappropriate to claim that disclosures of extreme abuse and/or human sacrifice rituals are ‘delusions’ and indicative of Schizophrenia.

The title of the study above is also interesting to note, as it mentions the cremation of care ceremony. This is a ceremony held at the Bohemian Grove, where a number of ‘establishment’ members gather and hold what is supposedly a mock ceremony. Many have suggested that some human sacrifices and rituals, like the ones mentioned above,  take place at these events. You can read more about it here. Here’s an interesting document that provides insights on what Bohemian grove meetings claim to represent, but it also provides an interesting list of the types of people that are in attendance.

Sir Jimmy Savile, a BBC children’s television presenter feted by the Royal Family and Downing Street, abused 450 victims, mostly boys and girls as young as eight over 50 years. While Savile had long been seen as odd, the scale of his offenses shocked the country. He was even allowed special access to hospitals, and the authorities laughed at or ignored his victims before he died a national hero. He was very close with the Royal Family.

This kind of thing has been floating around out there for decades. For example, a member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected pedophile ring under investigation by the police in the late 1980s, a former police officer has said. The former Metropolitan Police officer said he was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for national security reasons. “I was in a car with two other vice squad officers … The detective sergeant said he had just had a major child abuse investigation shut down by the CPS regarding a royal and an MP,” he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper. “He did not mention names, but he said the CPS had said it was not in the public’s interest because it ‘could destabilise national security’.”

When it comes to these pedophile rings and what goes on within them,  cites multiple papers and explains multiple cases:

Epstein, Schwartz & Schwartz (2011) described cases of ‘Forced Impregnation’ by cult members which were followed by Human Sacrifice rituals. They also described UK based abuse groups forced ‘child-on child’ sex abuse salient to the case. Sc0tt (2001) described the casual ease with which some abuse perpetrations torture and kill. 36 survivors completed her survey of whom 34 claimed abuse by members of their immediate family, and 21 by one or both parents. For 34 ritual abuse in childhood involved murder and for 16 involved forced childbirth/abortion. Bekker, Karriker, Overkamp and Rutz (2008) found in their extreme abuse survey that ‘forced impregnation’ by 40 % of 1041 of adult survivors and 33 % of  82 child survivors, and disclosed to 70 percent of 221 professionals bearing witness. Murder of a ‘breeder baby’ by the perpetrators was reported by 26%, 18% and 55% respectively. Witnessing murder by perpetrators was reported 56%, 43% and 77% respectively.

Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 19819 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members. Former state senator John W DeCamp, cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history, is today attorney for two of the abuse victims. A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others.

The key sentence above is “when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment; members. Evidence shows that Jeffrey Epstein, for example, was involved in black mailing high ranking people, like politicians, bankers entertainers etc. His job may have been to work with various intelligence agencies and entrap these important people, filming them, for example, while engaging in inappropriate acts.

Epstein had a lot of dirt on a lot of people, which is why he was probably murdered.

Hearing From A Survivor, Our Interview with One.

Anneke Lucas is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model.

Her work is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental and physical wellbeing after surviving some of the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12. Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network by her family, she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture.

We recently conducted an interview with her. Below is a clip from the four part series, as it was a very long and detailed interview. You can access the full interview and start your free trial HERE on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics.

She was raped 1,700 hours before reaching the age of 12 during horrifying abuse. Children were scared into silence and members of the network killed those who threatened to go to the police. At the age of 11, it was decided she was ‘of no use anymore’ and was to be killed

This kind of thing is worldwide. In the interview above, Anneke’s story comes from Belgium. In 2004 a Belgium paedophile and child killer Marc Dutroux was sentenced to life in prison for the abduction and rape of six girls – aged between eight and 19 – in 1995 and 1996, and the deaths of two of them, who he buried alive. An accomplice, Michel Lelievre – a drug addict and petty thief – told police soon after his arrest that the girls had been kidnapped to order, for someone else. The chief suspect was Jean Michel Nihoul, a Brussels businessman, pub-owner and familiar face at sex parties. While they had been in prison, Lelievre told police, Dutroux and Nihoul met frequently in the exercise yard, making plans. The judge investigating the case, Jean-Marc Connerotte, believed Nihoul was the brains behind the operation. But, as the network began to unravel, Lelievre suddenly stopped co-operating, saying he had been threatened.

According to Olenka Frenkiel, an award winning filmmaker journalist, who wrote a piece for the Guardian in 2002 on the subject:

I met Nihoul in a restaurant in Brussels. ‘I am the Monster of Belgium,’ he roared at me by way of greeting. He is confident he will never come to trial and that the evidence against him will never be heard by any jury. During the course of our meal he, apparently playfully, grabbed me, tickling, and finally pulled me over on to him in the restaurant booth until I had to appeal to my colleagues for rescue.
He will never come to court, he said, because the information he has about important people in Belgium would bring the government down. The Monster of Belgium denies he’s a paedophile but seemed to enjoy his notoriety and demanded £1,000 for his story. We declined his offer. Every documentary likes a monster but we don’t pay for interviews and frankly I’d already had enough.

A recent post by Anneke on Nihoul, who recently passed away:

I came across Michel Nihoul when he first started at his job, back in 1973. He was the biggest fan of the politician who doubled as the boss of the network, and indeed already tried to copy the latter super dry, sarcastic and sadistic humor – only Nihoul’s jokes were not only psychopathic, they were in terribly bad taste. In his later life, when interviewed, Nihoul also copied his idol’s theatrical style, and the latter’s flair for dramatic pauses – which turned deflated and empty whenever Nihoul went for the same effect.
Nihoul loved nothing more than the be the gopher for his idol, and made himself useful as the middleman between the pimps, parents, child victims and the elite clients of the network. An eternal brownnose, he used his sense of importance related to his connections with VIP’s to the max. He did anything and everything just for that.
Michel Nihoul was the adult in charge of my torture, and indoctrinated four other children in the process. It was during this time that our souls got very close, when I connected with him on the deepest possible level to try to survive. I would not have succeeded, and the torture was stopped because someone else intervened. Nihoul’s words of wisdom were in reference to me: “You’re making a big mistake. She’s going to give us trouble.”

According to Encyclopedia:

The murders of several children led to the discovery of a pedophile ring. Investigations surrounding these crimes started a chain reaction which ultimately led to the discovery of excess, corruption, and other serious inadequacies in the nation’s system of law enforcement.

A book published by two French journalists regarding Marc Dutroux (mentioned above) implicated King Albert II within these pedophile rings as well. The Royal Family actually took the journalists to court. (source)

In the UK, Peter McKelvie, a former child protection chief in the UK, gained attention when he claimed that senior politicians, military figures and even people linked to the Royal Family were among the alleged abusers. While working in Hereford and Worcester, he helped to convict notorious child abuser Peter Righton, who was once one of the country’s most respected authorities on child care.  This highlights a great point, and something that I’ve come across multiple times in my research. Many people who work for national child care protection programs are directly involved in this type of thing. McKelvie  is one of many who told the world that these types of powerful VIP pedophile rings have been running in secrecy for multiple years. (source)

Congress is now looking at a bipartisan bill to stop employees from sharing child porn on Department of Defense computers. Yes, it’s a real problem, which begs the questions: Where are these kids coming from? Who is making these kids ‘perform,’ who is filming them, and where are these high-ranking people getting this from?

“The notion that the Department of Defense’s network and Pentagon-issued computers may be used to view, create, or circulate such horrifying images is a shameful disgrace, and one we must fight head on.” – Abigail Spanberger (D-Virginia), spoken in a  statement as she and co-sponsor Mark Meadows (R-N. Carolina) introduced the End National Defense Network Abuse (END Network Abuse) Act in the House.

As The Hill reports, “The Pentagon’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service subsequently identified hundreds of DOD-affiliated individuals as suspects involved in accessing child pornography, several of whom used government devices to use and share the images.”

The list is long, and the examples are always connected to great power.

Oh yes, let’s not forget about the Vatican, and multiple Pope’s and high ranking Vatican personnel being implicated in the ritualistic abuse of children. You can read more about that here.

The Takeaway

There is so much evidence showing that the global financial elite (various members of big politics, corporations, Hollywood, Royal Families, and people in positions of great power, the Vatican, etc.) are engaged in psychopathic behaviour. But are you really surprised? Look at the world and its systems and all aspects that surround humanity… It’s truly a reflection of psychopathic ‘leaders.’ And it’s a reflection of us being totally oblivious to it as a result of mass brainwashing. Still, in many cases, we support and stand up for these systems, and accept no other way. We refuse to acknowledge things that any fairly intelligent person should be able to see with a bit of investigation.

If you watch our interview with Anneke Lucas, you will see how there is a very positive and uplifting message that comes out of all of this, despite the disheartening subject matter. Human trafficking and child abuse represent the most untold stories of our generation, as they hurt millions of souls every year, many of them being children.

We are slowly coming to terms with the fact that this happens at elite levels, done by some of the most ‘prominent’ and powerful people. It’s time to talk about it, and it’s time to ask more questions. Let’s keep disclosure coming.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Two Prison Guards Have Been Charged & Implicated In The Death of Jeffrey Epstein

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Two prison guards have been implicated in the death of Jeffrey Epstein. They failed to do their required duties as Epstein went unchecked throughout the entire night.

  • Reflect On:

    How many "high ranking" figures are involved in this type of activity? Does it go far beyond child trafficking and the sexual abuse of minors?

Two Bureau of Prisons guards were recently charged by a federal grand jury with filling false records, as well as conspiracy, the night Jeffrey Epstein died in prison. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas have been taken into custody. For those of you who didn’t known, Jeffrey Epstein was a convicted pedophile who was in custody for pedophilia and child trafficking. All of the mainstream attention this case brought in also brought other powerful people that were connected to the billionaire and possible similar activities into the picture, like Prince Andrew of the Royal Family, for example.

Unfortunately elite level pedophilia goes far beyond the already horrendous acts of pedophilia and sexual abuse, but into ritual abuse, murder, mind control and more, more on this later in the article. This is the next step which has yet to hit the mainstream, and one reason why Jeffrey Epstein was perhaps killed. He had a lot of ‘dirt’ on many powerful people. In fact, there is evidence suggesting his job was to entrap the political and financial elite for the purpose of blackmail. Perhaps Epstein was in someway entrapped himself? Who knows.

The case of these two guards are another addition to the pieces of a puzzle suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered. The night of Epstein’s death, the guards failed to complete the required counts of prisoners on their watch in the specialized housing unit where he was being held. According to the indictment, they instead sat at their desks, browsing the internet. The counts were supposed to take place every 30 minutes. For a period of approximately two hours, the indictment says, Noel and Thomas “sat at their desk without moving, and appeared to have been asleep.” Furthermore, the two guards  signed false certifications saying they had performed their duties. The night Epstein died, no officer completed any count or round in the unit between 10:30 p.m. and 6:30 a.m, which is when Epstein’s body was discovered.

Quite strange? Isn’t it? You would think that someone on suicide watch would be monitored, you would also think there would be video cameras on them as well. The idea that Epstein was murdered is not new. Shortly after his death. Rudy Giuliani said that “It is inconceivable Epstein could have hung himself… Follow the motives.” So, you can see, the idea was floating around within these circles…

Former New York City medical examiner and forensic pioneer Dr. Michael Baden was hired by Jeffrey Epstein’s brother and has shared his view that Epstein was murdered. You can read more about that here.

Another interesting point to note was shared by Preet Bharara, the former federal prosecutor in Manhattan:

advertisement - learn more

What happened to the footage? Should that not put the nail in the coffin as to how Epstein died?

Sen. Ben Sasse, a Republican from Nebraska and chair of the Senate judiciary oversight committee, and one who had asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate the handling of the Epstein case said:

“Every single person in the Justice Department — from your Main Justice headquarters staff all the way to the night-shift jailer — knew that this man was a suicide risk, and that his dark secrets couldn’t be allowed to die with him.” He wrote this in a letter.

Given Epstein’s previous attempted suicide, he should have been locked in a padded room under unbroken, 24/7, constant surveillance, Obviously, heads must roll,” Sasse said. (source)

The point is, it shows the level of power and control one has to have to get this kind of thing. A power that goes all the way to the top, wherever that ‘top’ may be.

Our Interview With A Survivor of Elite Level Pedophilia and Child Sex Trafficking.

The attention that the Epstein case is getting is great to see, although it would be nice to see more of a focus from the mainstream on the topic of child trafficking, it is still waking people up to the reality of elite level trafficking though. This topic goes deep into ritual abuse, murder, torture and much more, and the best place to learn more about it are from the actual victims of it.

Anneke Lucas is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model. She is a survivor of the phenomenon and if you want to dive deep into, we interviewed her. You can access the full interview and start your free trial HERE on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics, because we are being heavily censored.

Her works is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental and physical wellbeing after surviving some of the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12. Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network, she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture.

The Takeaway

Much is coming to light in multiple areas of the human experience. It’s all a part of the process to see the world as it really is. Are important decisions about our world really being made by people who are engaged in such activity? How can we expect those who engage in this activity to truly care about the well being of the planet and all life on it? With transparency comes change, but transparency and awareness is the first step. Many of the people involved in inflicting this type of abuse on others are actually full of trauma themselves, and are in need of healing. We live in a world that casts instant judgement and fails to look at the bigger picture. This is why a dramatic change in consciousness is needed on our planet. We need to ‘see’ with our hearts and grow spiritually as a species in order to move forward, while at the same time do all we can to stop what is happening.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Prince Andrew Talks About Jeffrey Epstein In A New Interview

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Prince Andrew's recent interview with the BBC was filled with hard to believe claims of innocence from the Prince.

  • Reflect On:

    Was this interview conducted in order to isolate Prince Andrew from the way the rest of the Royal Family is perceived?

Good lord. It felt like listening to a 5-year old boy denying that he had raided the candy jar, all while surreptitiously licking away the chocolate stains from around his mouth. The only difference is that, while the guilty child usually gives up quickly on his obvious ruse, Prince Andrew’s recent interview with the BBC lasted almost an hour, and he proclaimed his innocence right to the end.

I watched the whole thing, mainly because I was waiting for him to say a single credible thing that would give me the slightest reason to believe his outright claims that he knew nothing about Jeffrey Epstein’s penchant for young girls, and that he had nothing to do with Virginia Roberts Guiffre and in fact didn’t even know who she was.

Alas, I was not moved by a single word he said. I include the full interview below in case anyone wants to wade through it and fish out something credible to prove me wrong.

A New Era For Royalty

In a way, you can’t really blame Andrew for offering such unsubstantiated denials, which careened between flat statements that the events in question did not happen and rambling exhortations that he does not remember those same events. As a member of the Royal Family, he has never been forced to justify his actions his whole life (except perhaps in private to his mother the Queen). Out in public if he said something was so, then all those around him would take it to be gospel. And very much like official Royal Family proclamations, which effectively have been treated as the ‘last word’ on a given subject in society for centuries, he somehow still seems to feel that sense of entitlement, that if it comes out of his mouth then at least his loyalists will regard it as true.

We are, however, in a new era. This signs are now obvious. And credit interviewer Emily Maitlis with bringing this point up near the end of the interview:

advertisement - learn more

EM: I know we have to bring this to a close because we’re running out of time. You’ve faced questions today on a very, very raw subject. There has never been an interview like this before, I wonder what that tells us about the way the Royal Family now confronts these difficult situations. Has there been a sea change?

PA: I think the problem that I’m… we face in the 21st Century is social media. There is a whole range of things that you face now that you didn’t face 25 years ago because it was just the print media.

I mean there are all sorts of things that are on the internet and out there in the public domain that we just sort of go, “Well, yeah,” but I’m afraid is… it just never happened.

There is probably something to what Prince Andrew is saying here. Social media and the internet in general, in which information such as the picture of him with his arm around Virginia Roberts’ waist with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background is able to widely proliferate, simply makes it more difficult for people who do bad things to hide the evidence and control the narrative than it was during earlier times with a complicit print-only media. When he says his problem is social media, he is implying it is easy for people to make stuff up. But what it really means is that he cannot as easily indulge in illegal and immoral activity in the era of social media.

But it isn’t just the internet. That picture and the knowledge of Prince Andrew’s chummy relationship with Jeff Epstein have been floating around the internet for over a decade. Suddenly, within the last year or two, we seem to have entered firmly into an era of accountability, in which the public has become more aware, conscious, and inquisitive about what is going on. Not the entire public, but a critical enough mass of people such that former ‘untouchables’ like Prince Andrew have to address rumors of wrongdoing that are no longer being swept away by the next news cycle. He almost admits as much himself when explaining his decision to speak out:

Choosing to, as it were, get out there and talk about these things, it’s almost… it’s almost a mental health issue to some extent for me in the sense that it’s been nagging at my mind for a great many years.

I could go on and poke holes in just about every response he gave to try to counter known facts, sworn affidavits and other witness testimony of where he was, when, and with who, but even mainstream media has gotten in on the incredulity of his argument, where he will often categorically say that he ‘was not there’ or ‘did not do that,’ but would not go so far as to say that the person who says he did is not telling the truth, like in this exchange:

EM: Another guest was John Brockman, the literary agent. Now, he described seeing you there getting a foot massage from a young Russian woman, did that happen?

PA: No.

EM: You’re absolutely sure or you can’t remember?

PA: Yeah, I’m absolutely sure.

EM: So John Brockman’s statement is false?

PA: I wouldn’t… I wouldn’t… I don’t know Mr Brockman so I don’t know what he’s talking about.

Cringe-Worthy Alibis

I have to put this last exchange up, simply because I found it so entertaining. In response to Virginia Roberts Guiffre’s vivid account of the evening of March 10th, 2001 which she said they spent together, Andrew spins a number of interesting reasons why her account just could not be so, including that he does not drink, that he suffered from a war injury that would have prevented him from sweating at that time, and that he specifically remembers taking his daughter Beatrice to a pizza party that day:

EM: Virginia Roberts has made allegations against you. She says she met you in 2001, she says she dined with you, danced with you at Tramp Nightclub in London. She went on to have sex with you in a house in Belgravia belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, your friend. Your response?

PA: I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever.

EM: You don’t remember meeting her?

PA: No.

EM: She says she met you in 2001, she dined with you, she danced with you, you bought her drinks, you were in Tramp Nightclub in London and she went on to have sex with you in a house in Belgravia belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell.

PA: It didn’t happen.

EM: Do you remember her?

PA: No, I’ve no recollection of ever meeting her, I’m almost, in fact I’m convinced that I was never in Tramps with her. There are a number of things that are wrong with that story, one of which is that I don’t know where the bar is in Tramps. I don’t drink, I don’t think I’ve ever bought a drink in Tramps whenever I was there.

EM: Do you remember dancing at Tramp?

PA: No, that couldn’t have happened because the date that’s being suggested I was at home with the children.

EM: You know that you were at home with the children, was it a memorable night?

PA: On that particular day that we now understand is the date which is the 10th of March, I was at home, I was with the children and I’d taken Beatrice to a Pizza Express in Woking for a party at I suppose sort of 4:00 or 5:00 in the afternoon. And then because the duchess was away, we have a simple rule in the family that when one is away the other one is there. I was on terminal leave at the time from the Royal Navy so therefore I was at home.

EM: Why would you remember that so specifically? Why would you remember a Pizza Express birthday and being at home?

PA: Because going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do, a very unusual thing for me to do. I’ve never been… I’ve only been to Woking a couple of times and I remember it weirdly distinctly. As soon as somebody reminded me of it, I went, “Oh yes, I remember that.” But I have no recollection of ever meeting or being in the company or the presence.

EM: So you’re absolutely sure that you were at home on the 10th March?

PA: Yeah.

EM: She was very specific about that night, she described dancing with you.

PA: No.

EM: And you profusely sweating and that she went on to have a bath possibly.

PA: There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time and that was… was it… yes, I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and I simply… it was almost impossible for me to sweat. And it’s only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I am starting to be able to do that again. So I’m afraid to say that there’s a medical condition that says that I didn’t do it so therefore…

EM: Is it possible that you met Virginia Roberts, dined with her, danced with her in Tramp, had sex with her on another date?

PA: No.

EM: Do you remember meeting her at all?

PA: No.

EM: Do you know you didn’t meet her or do you just not remember meeting her?

PA: No, I have… I don’t know if I’ve met her but no, I have no recollection of meeting her.

EM: Because she was very specific, she described the dance that you had together in Tramp. She described meeting you, she was a 17-year-old girl meeting a senior member of the Royal Family.

PA: It never happened.

It’s just amazing that he claims to remember vivid details about his ‘exculpatory evidence’ of driving his daughter to a pizza party on a particular date, but claims not to remember a woman he was in a picture with and says he had sex with her on several occasions. One is left to ask why Prince Andrew would go ahead and attend this interview, given how lame and unsubstantial he must have known his denials would be.

The Real Purpose Of The Interview

There is only one reasonable explanation for Prince Andrew conducting the interview in the way that he did: he was ordered to do it by his mother Queen Elizabeth. As damaging as Prince Andrew’s behavior has been in terms of being an embarrassing rogue within the Royal Family, it has the potential to be far more damaging. There could be a fear that growing numbers of people will put the pieces together and conclude that the entire Royal Family, and by extension Royal Families and Nobility all around the world, have long been involved not only in the things that Prince Andrew appears to have been involved in. Worse, people might begin to give more credence to testimony that Royalty have long been involved not only in human trafficking and the rape of underaged girls, but also Satanic Ritual Abuses such as pedophilia, torture, human sacrifice, and cannibalism.

If you go through the interview, you will notice one thing that Andrew is careful to do is to deflect any sense of responsibility or blame away from the Royal Family, or any advisors, and puts the ‘blame’ squarely on himself–though his self-blame is limited to his 2010 visit to Epstein, during which he spent a number of days at the mansion of the known sex offender. He tried his best to frame that visit as an in-person break-up of the friendship that he alone decided to do, noting that it would have been ‘chicken’ of him to end the friendship over the phone.

EM: Who advised you then that it was a good idea to go and break up the friendship? Did that come from the palace, was Her Majesty, the Queen involved?

PA: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that came from… so there were a number of people who… so some people from my staff, some people from friends and family I was talking to and I took the decision that it was I had to show leadership and I had to go and see him and I had to tell him, “That’s it.”

And he was clear to distinguish his own personal family’s struggles with this issue from the Royal Family’s:

EM: Has the episode been damaging to the Royal Family, to Her Majesty the Queen?

PA: I don’t believe it’s been damaging to the Queen at all.

It’s subtle, but the overall impact of the interview is that Prince Andrew appears as some kind of lying buffoon who is not willing to admit any of his embarrassing indiscretions. The Royal Family, on the other hand, while allegedly being supportive for the prince as a person, are preemptively seen in the guise of righteous, disapproving parents if any of these activities turn out to be true as the majority of the public suspect. The perception of the Royal Family as an institution that embodies proper moral conduct, then, is far more important here than public impressions of one wayward prince.

The Takeaway

One of the prime strategies of all large power factions that operate in the world is to ‘prune’ the branches that reveal the inherent immorality of the whole so that the tree is preserved and not tainted by the sagging branch. Prince Andrew is the latest powerful scapegoat to be thrust out into the spotlight, and it appears to be a sign that we are getting ever closer to unveiling the heart of the beast itself, which would constitute a major step in our liberation.

Related CE Article: Jeffrey Epstein’s Case Raises Questions About Royal Family Pedophilia & Elite Ritualistic Abuse of Children

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod

Censorship is hiding us from you.

Get breaking conscious news articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!