Connect with us

Awareness

Chemo Drugs For Life Or Raw Milk? Ulcerative Colitis Cured?

Published

on

Below you can watch the full interview to hear Doug’s journey firsthand and learn how he cured himself with raw milk, fermented foods, and a high fat diet. (If you’re more of a reader, see the write-up underneath!) Doug went from pharmaceuticals, to steroids, to chemotherapy drugs, and then even faced surgery to remove his large intestine. Today he is completely symptom-free and has been for 2 years.

advertisement - learn more

How He Got Sick

Doug was once like any other teenager eating a “SAD” (Standard American Diet). He was a self-professed “human garbage disposal,” eating anything and everything in sight with no issue. Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) was the reason he got out of bed each morning, and if you’ve ever seen MMA fighters in the act, you’ll know that a strong, healthy body is essential for success.

One fateful night, Doug got into a fist fight in the midst of defending someone very close to him. He ended up splitting his left hand open on the teeth of his opponent. As soon as he told me this, my eyes widened – we harbour some very dangerous bacteria in our mouths. That’s the last place you’d want touching your open wound!

My fears were confirmed when Doug told me what happened next. The cut, of course, became infected, so Doug went to the hospital for what he thought would be a simple round of antibiotics. He walked away with a script for doxycycline and a smile… until a few weeks later, when his hand turned green with the added bonus of leaking pus. Fun.

This time he went straight to the emergency room and was greeted with a shocking, “Prep him for surgery. We’re going to have to remove his fingers.”

A nurse stepped in moments before surgery and begged the team to save his hand. She suggested a pickline, funneled through a vein in his chest, with a daily IV antibiotic that would send the medicine all the way down his arm. Thankfully they listened, and every single day thereafter that incredible nurse was at his door to administer a fresh serving of IV vancomycin.

advertisement - learn more

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 9.12.35 PM

The IV antibiotics saved his fingers but came at a costly price. Halfway through the treatment he collapsed with a 104* fever, which doctors feared could be caused by meningitis. He was rushed in for a spinal tap, cleared of meningitis, and continued his last month of IV therapy like a champ. Unfortunately, the secondary infections and fevers continued. His immune system was taking a huge hit from the constant administration of IV drugs that were destroying the microbiome of his gut. The next two years he was sick a lot, but grateful to have a hand, nonetheless.

Then one day, he came down with a flu unlike any other. It took weeks to get over, and although most symptoms disappeared with the virus, his stomach symptoms remained.

Every night thereafter, Doug was plagued with stabbing pain, nausea, diarrhea, no appetite, and blood in his stool. This went on for weeks until he actually began throwing up blood as well. He was losing weight quickly and knew something wasn’t right.

The Diagnosis

Doug made his way to a gastroenterologist, who he was confident would be able to diagnose and swiftly treat whatever was plaguing him. This was exactly what I thought when I went in for the treatment of my IBS. Unfortunately for me and Doug, we quickly learned that doctors knew just about as much as we did in terms of what was wreaking havoc in our guts.

Fecal test – negative for bacteria and parasites (so was mine, and yet check out the worm I passed with herbs!)

Endoscopy/Colonoscopy – positive for severe inflammation.

IMG_9493

“You have ulcerative colitis,” the doctor told him. “We don’t know what’s causing it, but we do have a protocol to treat it, so let’s get started.”

That protocol, unfortunately, was a guessing game of pharmaceuticals that left Doug in even worse pain, depressed, and desperate for answers.

Let’s Play A Game

1. Lialda, an anti-inflammatory drug, was first on the roster. Alongside Lialda was an anti-spasmodic that did nothing but make Doug’s symptoms worse.

In the interview above, Doug and I decided to take a look at the side effects of Lialda vs. the actual symptoms of ulcerative colitis. We discovered exactly what Doug did when he was wondering why he felt so bad: they were the same. Severe stomach pain, cramping, bloody diarrhea, nausea, upper stomach pain, loss of appetite. Doug experienced severe heart palpitations that scared him and his entire family. “This isn’t worth it,” he thought to himself. The side effects were worse than the disease!

2. Steroids were next on the list.

It started with 20mg of prednisone, then 40, then 60. Doug’s face blew up into the shape of a moon and he could not get to sleep no matter how hard he tried. He said the brain fog he experienced from these steroids was the worst of his entire life. The joint pain was unbearable.

3. Time to go with the big guns: chemotherapy drugs. 6MP to be exact.

“This was the darkest period of my entire life,” said Doug. “I was so depressed and weak, I could not get out of bed. I wanted to die.” He was 137 lbs and wasting away before his family’s eyes.

At this point, Doug was told he would have to either stay on these drugs for life (no matter how bad they made him feel), or he would have to have his entire large intestine removed.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 9.13.55 PM

“The only other way is to cut out your large intestine. Once we do this, there’s no going back.”

“What about diet?” asked Doug. “Isn’t there something I can do?”

“No,” doctors replied. “If something bothers you, don’t eat it, but we believe diet has nothing to do with it.”

Doug made his way to the specialist’s office and was ready to give up his entire large intestine until the surgeon stopped him and said, “Look, you’re 21. Take my advice. Things can happen. Try to stick it out for a few months, and then come back to me.”

The Awakening

Doug went to the place we all come to when we’re lost (and the place you happen to be right now) – the internet. He scoured forums about Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease. He tried every suggestion that seemed viable. He went on a vegan diet. Went macrobiotic, even. Nothing worked, and eating fibrous vegetables like leafy greens or grains such as brown rice just made the problem worse due to how damaged and irritated his gut lining was.

And then, someone said the two words that changed his life: raw milk.

Every single person on the forum laughed at the notion, but something in Doug’s intuition told him to give it a go. “I have nothing to lose. I can either try this crazy idea of raw milk. or lose my intestine,” he thought.

Doug started researching where to get the milk (www.realmilk.com), and realized that the FDA cracks down on this incredibly healing food because they know it will cut into their pharmaceutical profits. I highly suggest watching the documentary Farmageddon to see just how far our government will go to hide the benefits and prevent accessibility to this wonderful substance.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 7.44.49 PM

He ordered a gallon from a brave, local farm, took his first sip, and was amazed. “It was completely different from the milk you get in the store,” he told me.

“In fact, pasteurized milk was one of my worst triggers. With raw milk I felt incredible.”

He saw that the milk had this interesting yellow colour to it, and later realized that this is because the cows were grass-fed on organic land. Cows fed fresh green forage, especially those grazing on grass, have been shown to have higher levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and essential fatty acids in their milk – the components that give it this rich color (1,2). Animal studies show that as little as 0.5 percent CLA in your diet could reduce tumors by over 50 percent, including the following types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, skin, and stomach (1, 2, 3). It’s also shown to lower body fat, increase lean body mass, and reduce inflammation, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease (1, 2, 3).

After 2-3 weeks, he started putting weight back on and was absolutely ecstatic. He began including raw cream and butter into his diet as well, and wondered what else the farm had to offer. He saw they offered “organic” produce and soon realized his milk was organic as well.

This, of course, opened the doors to the rabbit hole and he educated himself on GMOs, toxic food additives, pesticides, and so much more. This is a topic for another blog post, but essentially he completely cut out GMOs from his diet and went 100% organic. The difference was immediate.

Doug’s Healing Diet

At this point, Doug was knee-deep in research. He knew he wasn’t ready to digest irritating plant fiber, and knew that sugar, fruit, and carbs were some of his worst trigger foods due to candida and his leaky gut. He also knew that fats could be very healing to seal his damaged gut, so he went on a high fat paleo diet, eating predominately “low-FODMAP” foods.

The low-FODMAP diet is a scientifically proven diet plan which helps control symptoms of IBS and similar disorders. The theory is that eating foods high in FODMAPs increases the amount of liquid and gas in the small and large intestine, resulting in common IBS symptoms such as bloating, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. FODMAPs are a group of carbohydrates found in a wide range of foods from apples to kidney beans – even honey! FODMAPs bring more water into the bowel because they are poorly absorbed in the gut and are fermented rapidly by bacteria in the bowel. Both of these distend the intestine (stretch its walls) and this causes the pain, bloating, and change in bowel habits.

doug's healing diet

Why no leafy greens for the first few months? As you saw above, Doug’s intestinal lining was absolutely destroyed. You can imagine how it felt to have fibrous foods scratching against the raw, inflamed lining. Thankfully, he was very diligent with his high-fat diet, and after many months was eventually able to introduce cooked greens back into his plan.

So what did he do for vegetables and fiber? Doug found out that he was also unable to deal with the fiber in vegetables because he had absolutely no good bacteria left over in his intestines from his previous antibiotic regimen. Here comes the magic of fermented vegetables: they were already partially broken down by the good bacteria fermenting them! He may not have had any probiotics in his intestines, but he sure could eat them and the vegetables that they love to pre-digest. This way, he not only got his daily intake of veggies – he also got a TON of the probiotics he desperately needed to repopulate his microbiome.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 8.33.33 PM

You can read my article on the benefits of fermented foods here.

And now, the question you’ve been waiting for: WHY RAW MILK?

I know, I know. The internet has demonized dairy. And we should absolutely be against dead, pasteurized, factory-farmed dairy with no live enzymes to help us break it down. But here’s the scoop on this traditional food when it’s consumed raw, in its proper form.

Doug knew that his journey to dis-ease began when he was given extended IV antibiotic therapy. He connected the dots and realized that his gut was bombed by an indiscriminate weapon that killed everything in its sight. And while this meant his infection was gone, it also meant that his gut soldiers were gone as well. His microbiome was destroyed, and the bad bacteria had taken over.

Dr. Deborah Gordon, M.D. explains it best:

Raw milk refers to unprocessed, untreated milk straight from the cow. The milk you buy from the local supermarket nowadays is a different substance altogether. It has been pasteurized, ultra-pasteurized, or homogenized. This liquid is not really milk. It is a chemically altered substance, heated to remove pathogens and bacteria and to prolong its shelf life. The resultant low-enzyme activity makes it difficult to digest, the altered fat content renders the vitamins and minerals difficult to absorb, and the residual drugs and antibiotics pose a threat to human health. On top of this, the naturally occurring beneficial bacteria have been destroyed.

The only reason commercial supermarket milk is pasteurized is because it would be incredibly dangerous to drink raw milk from a factory-farmed cow. Factory-farmed animals are routinely fed an unnatural, high-protein GMO soy and corn-based diet. This diet is so toxic to their biology that it causes severe illnesses that can only be combated by continually injecting the cows with antibiotics. These animals, kept in inhumane conditions far from their natural environment, are subject to enormous stress.

Raw milk from grass-fed cows is a whole new ball game.

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 9.15.19 PM

Dr. Gordon, M.D. continues to explain that, “Raw milk is an incredibly complex whole food, complete with digestive enzymes and its own antiviral, antibacterial, and anti-parasitic mechanisms conveniently built into a neat package. It is chock-full of both fat and water-soluble vitamins, a wide range of minerals and trace elements, all eight essential amino acids, more than 60 enzymes, and CLA—an omega-6 fatty acid with impressive effects on everything from insulin resistance to cancer to cardiovascular disease.”

In fact, The Weston A. Price Foundation conducted an informal survey of over 700 families, and determined that over eighty percent of those diagnosed with lactose intolerance no longer suffer from symptoms after switching to raw milk. (1)

Why is that? Because raw milk actually contains the enzymes and probiotics you need to digest it!

When you’re a child, you produce the enzyme lactase to digest the molecule lactose from your mother’s milk. As we grow, we no longer produce it. Therefore, we would need to consume live, enzyme-rich raw milk that already contains abundant lactase to be able to break down the lactose. And that’s exactly what happens.

Raw milk’s probiotic content was able to repopulate Doug’s gut, and the healing fats and enzymes worked wonders on his inflamed, broken lining.

And speaking of raw milk’s anti-parasitic mechanisms: parasites play a huge role in all disorders of the gut, because as soon as the “good” soldiers are gone, the bad guys can take over. While drinking raw milk and eating a clean diet, Doug passed many different parasites including candida, pinworms, and more.

Ditch The Drugs

Doug felt so much better from his new diet, fermented foods, and raw milk that he decided to give up his chemo drugs and anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals… against his doctor’s orders.

Once he did that, his healing came full circle. He had not a symptom left in sight.

He walked into the doctor’s office a brand new man with 50 pounds of healthy weight and muscle put back on. “Wow, you look great!” said his physician. “The drugs are working, I propose?”

“Nope. I’m off every single one.”

His doctor’s jaw fell to the floor. “You are crazy,” he said. “You need them. This is a chronic disease. It will come back.”

“I’m sorry doc, but your medicine did nothing but make me worse. I found what works for me, and I’m not looking back.” With that sentiment he walked out of the office, and today he has been symptom free for 2 years.

“I feel like a bionic human now.”

If you met Doug in person, you would never know he was ill. He is strong, loving, caring, positive, and let me tell you – sharp as a knife. That’s what happens when you get sick and don’t have the answers. You have to teach yourself the truth from square one. He is so knowledgeable about so many facets of health and diet, and I am honoured to be his friend. Today he still eats a high fat paleo diet, but was able to re-introduce many wonderful foods such as sweet potatoes, starches, fruit, and nightshades. He still avoids gluten and grains (following paleo wisdom) and still drinks his raw milk every day, in much lesser quantities. He makes sure to include at least one serving of fermented vegetables with his meals and says he will never forget how important it is to care for your gut and the soldiers living inside of it, keeping you healthy and fighting off the bad guys.

“The most important part of my healing was a positive frame of mind,” he told me as we closed our interview.

“I never, ever gave up. I refused. That’s truly what kept me alive. That’s what got me through the worst days. I always believed I would get better.”

And you can, too.

A Quick Important Notice:

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Awareness

Brain Imaging Shows Autistic Brains Contain HIGH Amounts of Aluminum

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A study published early in 2018 identified very high amounts of aluminum lodged in the brains of multiple autistic people.

  • Reflect On:

    We know little about where the heavy metals used as adjuvants in vaccines and where they end up in the body. We now know that injected aluminum doesn't exit the body like aluminum intake from other sources. When injected, it ends up in the brain

A study published earlier in 2018 should have made headlines everywhere, as it discovered historically high amounts of aluminum in autistic brains. The study was conducted by some of the worlds leading scientists in the field.

Five people were used in the study, four males and one female, all between the ages of 14-50. Each of their brains contained unsafe and high amounts of aluminum compared to patients with other diseases where high brain aluminum content is common, like Alzheimer’s disease, for example.

Of course, this caused people to downplay the study, citing a low sample group, but that’s not entirely a valid argument given the reason why this study was conducted. As cited in the study above, recent studies on animals, published within the past few years, have supported a strong connection between aluminum, and aluminum adjuvants used in human vaccinations, and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD.)

Studies have also shown that injected aluminum does not exit the body, and can be detected inside the brain even a year after injection. That being said, when we take aluminum in from sources such as food, the body does a great job of getting it out, but there is a threshold. It’s important to acknowledge that the aluminum found in the brain, could be due to the presence of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. This latest study also identified the location of aluminum in these tissues, and where they end up. This particular study was done on humans, which builds upon, and still supports, the findings of the animal studies.

This is also important because the majority of studies that previously examined human exposure to aluminum have only used hair, blood and urine samples. The study also makes a clear statement regarding vaccines, stating that “Paediatric vaccines that include an aluminum adjuvant are an indirect measure of infant exposure to aluminum and their burgeoning use has been directly correlated with increasing prevalence of ASD.”

 Aluminum, in this case, was found in all four lobes of the brain.

advertisement - learn more

The aluminum content of brain tissues from donors with a diagnosis of ASD was extremely high (Table 1). While there was significant inter-tissue, inter-lobe and inter-subject variability the mean aluminium content for each lobe across all 5 individuals was towards the higher end of all previous (historical) measurements of brain aluminium content, including iatrogenic disorders such as dialysisencephalopathy[13][15][16][17][18][19]. All 4 male donors had significantly higher concentrations of brain aluminum than the single female donor. We recorded some of the highest values for brain aluminum content ever measured in healthy or diseased tissues in these male ASD donors

We Know, And Have Known, Aluminum Is Not Safe, Yet We Ignore It

When we talk about the ‘safe’ amount of aluminum here, there is no such thing. Aluminum is extremely toxic to any biological process, it’s not meant for us which is why it stayed deep within the Earth until we took it out. It has no place within us, and that’s simply due to the fact that it causes nothing but havoc. This makes it odd that we would put them in vaccinations despite the fact that for 100 years there has been no appropriate safety testing.

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans.

The quote above comes from a study published in 2011, it’s 2018 now and we’ve come along way in our understanding. We are starting to see even more research confirming the statement above.

Almost every study you read regarding previous studies on aluminum adjuvants within vaccines emphasized how the nature of its bioaccumulation is unknown, and a serious matter. We now know that it goes throughout the body, into distant organs eventually ends up in the brain.

Another fairly recent study from 2015 points out:

Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph notes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.(source)

The pictures below come from the recent 2018 study and show ‘bright spots’ that indicate heavy metals in the brain.

 

The more recent study discussed in this article is adding to that evidence. Below you can watch one of the most recent interviews with Dr. Eric Exly, one of the world’s foremost leading authors on the subject, and one of the authors of this most recent study. He is a Biologist (University of Stirling) with a Ph.D. in the ecotoxicology of aluminum. You can read more about his background here.

Take Away

People need to understand that despite media bullying, it’s ok to question vaccine safety, and there is plenty of reason to. There are many concerns, and heavy metals are one of them. In fact, the persistence and abundant presence of heavy metals in our environment, foods and medications is a concern, one that has been the clear cause for a variety of health ailments, yet it’s one that’s hardly addressed by the medical industry.

You can detox from this with items such as Spirulina, and waters that contain a high Silica content. There are studies that show various methods of detoxing can be used to get this lodged aluminum, or some of it, out of your body, organs and brain. This is where educating yourself regarding the medicinal value of food and nutrition is a key Perhaps this can be a motivation to better your diet, especially if you have, are someone, or know someone with an ASD diagnosis.

A Quick Important Notice:

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Awareness

The CDC’s Influenza Math Doesn’t Add Up: Exaggerating the Death Toll to Sell Flu Shots

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The flu shot is irresponsibly marketed, unnecessary and in some cases dangerous. This perspective comes from many people and health professionals, yet it's a narrative that's constantly ignored.

  • Reflect On:

    Is a flu shot really necessary? Are our immune systems suffering from a lack of real immunity? Are vaccines doing more harm than good?

Every year at about this time, public health officials and their media megaphones start up the drumbeat to encourage everyone (including half-year-old infants, pregnant women and the invalid elderly) to get a flu shot. Never mind that more often than not the vaccines don’t work, and sometimes even increase the risk of getting sick.

To buttress their alarmist message for 2018-2019, representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health agencies held a press conference and issued a press release on September 27, citing a particularly “record-breaking” (though unsubstantiated) 80,000 flu deaths last year. Having “medical experts and public health authorities publicly…state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)” is part and parcel of the CDC’s documented playbook for “fostering public interest and high…demand” for flu shots. CDC’s media relations experts frankly admit that “framing” the current flu season as “more severe than last or past years” or more “deadly” is a highly effective strategy for garnering strong interest and attention from both the media and the public.

If accurate, 80,000 deaths would represent an enormous (and mystifying) one-year jump—tens of thousands more flu deaths compared to the already inflated numbers presented for 2016 (and every prior year).

Peter Doshi (associate editor at The BMJ and a MIT graduate) has criticized the CDC’s “aggressive” promotion of flu shots, noting that although the annual public health campaigns deliver a “who-in-their-right-mind-could-possibly-disagree message,” the “rhetoric of science” trotted out each year by public health officials has a “shaky scientific basis.” Viewed within the context of Doshi’s remarks, the CDC’s high-flying flu numbers for 2017-2018 raise a number of questions. If accurate, 80,000 deaths would represent an enormous (and mystifying) one-year jump—tens of thousands more flu deaths compared to the already inflated numbers presented for 2016 (and every prior year). Moreover, assuming a roughly six-month season for peak flu activity, the 80,000 figure would translate to an average of over 13,300 deaths per month—something that no newspaper last year came close to reporting.

The CDC’s statistics are impervious to independent verification because they remain, thus far, unpublished—despite the agency’s pledge on its website to base its public health pronouncements on high-quality data derived openly and objectively. Could the CDC’s disappointment with influenza vaccination coverage—which lags far behind the agency’s target of 80%—have anything to do with the opacity of the flu data being used to peddle the unpopular and ineffective vaccines?

Fudging facts

There are a variety of reasons to question the precision with which the CDC likes to imbue its flu statistics. First, although the CDC states that it conducts influenza mortality surveillance with its partner agencies, there is no actual requirement for U.S. states to report adult flu deaths to the CDC. (In public health parlance, adult influenza deaths are not “reportable” or “nationally notifiable.”) In fact, the only “flu-associated deaths” that the CDC requires states and other jurisdictions to report are deaths in children—180 last year.

advertisement - learn more

…when actual death certificates are tallied, influenza deaths on average are little more than 1,000 yearly.

How did the CDC reach its as-yet-unpublished conclusion—widely shared with the media—that 79,820 American adults in addition to 180 children died from the flu in 2017-2018? The agency states that it relies on death certificate data. However, members of the Cochrane research community have observed that “when actual death certificates are tallied, influenza deaths on average are little more than 1,000 yearly.”

Other knowledgeable individuals have also noted that the death records system in the U.S. is subjective, incomplete and politicized, and have suggested that citizens should adopt a “healthy skepticism about even the most accepted, mainstream, nationally reported CDC or other ‘scientific’ statistics.” This skepticism may be especially warranted for the influenza stats, which are so inextricably intertwined with the CDC’s vaccination agenda that the statistical techniquesand assumptions that the agency uses focus specifically on “project[ing] the burden of influenza that would have occurred in the absence of vaccination.”

skepticism may be especially warranted for the influenza stats, which are so inetricably intertwined with the CDC’s vaccination agenda.

Notwithstanding its incessant use of influenza statistics to justify its flu vaccine policies, the CDC tries to have it both ways, cautioning that because “influenza activity reporting…is voluntary,” influenza surveillance in the U.S. “cannot be used to ascertain how many people have become ill with influenza during the influenza season.” A larger problem is that the vital statistics that form the basis of the CDC’s surveillance data conflate deaths from pneumonia and influenza (P&I). The CDC concedes that this conflation complicates the challenge of specifically estimating flu deaths:

The system “tracks the proportion of death certificates processed that list pneumonia or influenza as the underlying or contributing cause of death. This system…does not provide an exact number of how many people died from flu” [emphasis added].

Curiously, the CDC presented its cause-of-death data slightly differently prior to 2015. Through 2014, the agency’s annual National Vital Statistics Reports included tables showing influenza deaths and pneumonia deaths as separate line items. Those reports made it abundantly clear that pneumonia deaths (at least as transmitted by death certificates) consistently and dramatically outstripped influenza deaths. The table below illustrates this pattern for 2012-2014.

Starting in 2015, the annual vital statistics reports began displaying P&I together and eliminated the distinct line items. At present, only one tool remains to examine mortality associated with influenza as distinct from pneumonia—the CDC’s interactive FluView dashboard—which provides weekly national breakdowns. The dashboard shows the same general pattern as in the annual reports—that is, lower numbers of influenza deaths and much higher numbers of pneumonia deaths. Bearing in mind all the shortcomings and potential biases of death certificate data, dashboard reports for the first week of March (week 9) for the past three years show 257 influenza deaths versus 4,250 pneumonia deaths in 2016, and 534 and 736 flu deaths (versus over 4,000 annual pneumonia deaths) in 2017 and 2018, respectively.

When clinicians in outpatient settings do order testing, relatively few of the “flu” specimens—sometimes as low as 1%—actually test positive for influenza.

Semantic shenanigans

Semantics also play a key role in the CDC’s slippery communications about “flu.” For example, CDC’s outpatient surveillance focuses on the broad category of “influenza-like illness” (ILI)—an almost meaningless term describing general symptoms (fever, cough and/or sore throat) that any number of non-influenza viruses are equally capable of triggering. Cochrane lists several problems with the reliance on ILI to make inferences about influenza:

  • There is “no reliable system to monitor and quantify the epidemiology and impact of ILI” and no way of knowing what proportion of ILI is caused by influenza.
  • There are almost no reliable data on the number of ILI-related physician contacts or hospitalizations—and no one knows what proportion of ILI doctor visits and hospitalizations are due to influenza.

“Pneumonia,” too, is a catch-all diagnosis covering lung infections caused by a variety of different agents: viruses (non-influenza as well as influenza), bacteriafungiair pollutants and many others. Interestingly, hospitalization is a common route of exposure to pneumonia-causing pathogens, and mortality from hospital-acquired pneumonia exceeds 60%. In a plausible scenario, an adult hospitalized for suspected (but unconfirmed) “flu” could acquire a lethal pneumonia bug in the hospital, and their death might be chalked up to “flu” regardless of the actual facts, particularly because clinicians do not necessarily order influenza testing. When clinicians in outpatient settings do order testing, relatively few of the “flu” specimens—sometimes as low as 1%—actually test positive for influenza. Over the past couple of decades, the proportion of specimens testing positive has averaged around 15%—meaning that about 85% of suspected “flu” specimens are not, in fact, influenza.

Roughly four-fifths of the vaccine injury and death cases settled through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are flu-vaccine-related.

Propaganda with a purpose

It takes little subtlety to recognize that the principal reason for flu hyperbole is to sell more vaccines. However, more and more people—even infectious disease specialists—are realizing that flu shots are fraught with problems. Roughly four-fifths of the vaccine injury and death cases settled through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are flu-vaccine-related. A University of Toronto-based expert recently stated, “We have kind of hyped this vaccine so much for so long we are starting to believe our own hype.”

Pro-flu-vaccination studies—through their skillful placement in prestigious journals—tend to drown out other influenza studies that should be ringing warning bells. Published peer-reviewed studies show that:

  • Previous influenza vaccination, particularly in those who get a flu shot every year, diminishes or “blunts” the already low effectiveness of flu shots.
  • Getting vaccinated against influenza increases susceptibility to other severe respiratory viruses and also to other strains of influenza.
  • Mothers who receive influenza vaccines during pregnancy face an increased risk of miscarriages and their offspring face elevated risks of birth defects and autism.

A systematic review of influenza vaccine trials by Cochrane in 2010 urges the utmost caution. Noting that “studies funded from public sources [have been] significantly less likely [than industry-funded studies] to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines,” and citing evidence of “widespread manipulation of conclusions,” the Cochrane reviewers’ bottom line is that “reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin.” We should all keep those words in mind the next time the CDC and the media try to mischaracterize flu facts and science.

CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured.  Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission. Please visit our crowdfunding page.

A Quick Important Notice:

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Awareness

Purdue Pharma Funds ‘Opioid Antagonist’ In Obvious Ploy To Appear To Actually Care

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Purdue Pharma is providing a $3.42 million grant to 'Harm Reduction Therapeutics' to advance the development of its low-cost, over-the-counter (OTC) naloxone nasal spray which purportedly can reverse the effects of opioid overdose.

  • Reflect On:

    Can we use the blatant deception that characterizes marketing efforts of Big Pharma as motivation to really spread awareness amongst our friends, family and our fellow humans about better practices of health and wellness?

In the CE article ‘Study Reveals Big Pharma Paid Doctors Millions of Dollars To Push Opioids,’ Kalee Brown makes a cogent argument that the Opioid epidemic, which is responsible for at least two thirds of the record 72,000 overdose deaths in the U. S. last year, is the product of a carefully crafted strategy that stems from a sinister alignment of  self-interest between Big Pharma, doctors, and the government. This strategy, it would seem, has no limits to its wickedness:

It’s no secret that Big Pharma is a money-making machine. Many even suggest that they design drugs with negative side effects so you remain sick, thus growing their market of sick consumers — a view supported by the reality that doctors get compensated for selling you drugs, not for getting you off of them.

It’s not as though there is not a clear understanding about this among awakening individuals. There are numerous people who individually and collectively are fighting against this evil. Many have spurred efforts by city and state officials to sue Purdue Pharma, makers of the ruthlessly marketed opioid Oxycontin that is at the center of this epidemic. These efforts have made some inroads, in that they have stopped their aggressive marketing campaign in the US.

How They Defend Themselves

Typically, Purdue Pharma will argue in court that they should not be to blame for the recommendations of doctors or the free will choices of patients. This despite the fact that court cases have revealed that one of the prongs of their marketing strategy is to get doctors to minimize the dangers of Oxycontin in their discussions with their patients, or to deceive the doctors altogether about the dangers of Oxycontin.

Before becoming aware of how the pharmaceutical industry worked, I would have assumed (naively) that if a pharmaceutical company saw that its medications were causing harm to people (let alone an epidemic of overdose deaths) they would quickly take their product off the market. And short of that, doctors would simply stop prescribing the drug to their patients in deference to the Hippocratic oath they took which dictates primarily to “Do no harm.” Alas, far too many doctors do not take their oath to heart, preferring instead to defer their responsibility to the recommendations of regulatory agencies like the FDA and continue to take their profits for writing up prescriptions.

As for taking Oxycontin off the market? Well everybody knows by now that profit, not human health or even human life, is the sole decision-making marker for pharmaceutical giants like Purdue Pharma. And despite the inconvenience of all these lawsuits, they are willing to deal with those so long as the legal costs remain covered by the outlandish profits that Oxycontin and other opioids continue to generate.

advertisement - learn more

Staying In The Game

In their minds, there are still too many people who are in pain and want that pain alleviated the easy way, through drugs, they are willing to listen to their doctors, and trust the FDA and other government agencies. In other words, there is still too much money to be made to actually take the product off the market.

Having said that, with sales in decline, and restrictions now on their formerly successful marketing maneuvers, how can they position themselves to keep the lucrative Oxycontin game going longer?

Perhaps it was the new guy in the think-tank that raised his hand and came up with this outrageous idea one day. “Hey, why don’t we fund and promote a drug that we can say prevents death by overdose from Oxycontin? We can say it’s coming from some non-profit called, hmm, er, ‘Harm Reduction Therapeutics.’ Yeah. Some people will think we’re heroes!”

Don’t laugh. That’s exactly what they’ve done. Whether ‘Harm Reduction Therapeutics’ is truly an independent non-profit or the brainchild of Big Pharma giants doesn’t matter. The game remains the same.

New Wrinkle Of Depravity

And so just when we think we’ve seen and reported on all the possible depravity coming from Big Pharma, a new wrinkle appears on an already hideous face. And we don’t need to read any anti-Big Pharma commentary to see it. The thinly veiled ruse is broadcast on their website for all to see:

STAMFORD, Conn. and PITTSBURGH, Penn., September 5, 2018 – Purdue Pharma L.P. (Purdue) and Harm Reduction Therapeutics, Inc. today announced that Purdue is providing a $3.42 million grant to Harm Reduction Therapeutics to advance the development of its low-cost, over-the-counter (OTC) naloxone nasal spray in the United States. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist used to reverse the effects of a life-threatening opioid overdose.

Harm Reduction Therapeutics is an independent, non-profit pharmaceutical company whose mission is to “prevent opioid overdose deaths by making low-cost naloxone available to everyone.” Purdue’s contributions will help Harm Reduction Therapeutics accelerate the development of its OTC naloxone nasal spray by approximately 12 months.

This product will provide a low-cost alternative to prescription naloxone for both consumers and first responders. Given the nature of this grant, no revenues or royalties will be paid to Purdue.

The U.S. Surgeon GeneralFood and Drug AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and The President’s Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis all recommend expanded use of naloxone due to its potential for saving lives. Unfortunately, cost has been a barrier, especially in communities hardest hit by the opioid crisis.1

“Purdue is committed to advancing patient care and public safety. While naloxone accessibility cannot be seen as a single solution, it must be part of our collective actions,” said Craig Landau, MD, president and CEO, Purdue Pharma. “This grant is one example of the meaningful steps Purdue is taking to help address opioid abuse in our communities. Collaborating with a variety of partners is crucial to address the crisis we’re facing, and we are honored to support Harm Reduction Therapeutics as they work to prevent opioid-related deaths by increasing access to naloxone.”

So follow along here: instead of taking Oxycontin off the market, they’ve decided to gift a ‘Harm Reduction’ non-profit organization with a research grant of $3.42 million (peanuts) to hurry up with their low cost death-defying product. Purdue will receive no revenues or royalties from this low cost product, and thus can now position themselves as a company that is committed to ‘advancing patient care and public safety’ by showing their heartfelt concern about the opioid epidemic (which they caused).

The reality? Getting this low-cost ‘overdose prevention nasal spray’ into circulation as quickly as possible will actually allow them to get more people on to Oxycontin and prevent some others from breaking their addiction to it. Purdue’s hope is that the fear these patients might have about all the overdose deaths they’ve heard about may be assuaged by having access to a ‘super nasal spray’ to save them from the brink of death–if, that is, they are in any condition to properly operate the nasal spray in the throes of a drug overdose episode.

The Takeaway

Most of the readers of this article are likely aware of the nature of the Pharmaceutical Industry, and by extension the nature of the Western Medical Establishment in general. But reminders like this may help in giving us the courage to bring up such deceptive practices with friends and family who still think that Western medicine is geared towards our health, or that powerful opioids are really the best option for our symptoms.

Our compassion with others is fueled by our understanding, and in this way the blatantly self-serving actions like those of Purdue Pharma can help us to speak and act more effectively with our friends and loved ones, and help them reach a higher state of awareness about our health and how we can deal more safely with our pain.

A Quick Important Notice:

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

EL