Long gone are the days when it’s safe for people like us to assume that only death is inevitable. A recently published article in The British Medical Journal has discovered that not only death, but human errors are also inevitable. This is an alarming situation wherein authors of The British Medical Journal have estimated 251,000 deaths that took place in the U.S. in 2013 were due to medical mistakes.
You might be shocked to know the fact that this estimated figure is 2x as much compared to the death rate resulting from suicides, accidents, and firearms altogether in the U.S. If this isn’t going to be our main concern then what is?
The British Medical Journal published this paper to draw awareness to this dire issue and inspire a course of action to combat the situation. Hopefully this paper draws comprehensive reporting coverage and ignites steps to be taken to eliminate deaths caused by medical mistakes.
The ultimate way out of this alarming situation as described by Professor Martin Makary, a lead researcher and a professor of surgery, and Michael Daniel of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, is simply by admitting the problem publicly.
“It boils down to people dying from the care that they receive rather than the disease for which they are seeking care,” Martin Makary told The Washington Post.
As we can see, medical error doesn’t seem to be a legitimate cause of death because it has never been reported as a cause of death on any death certificate, nor has it been taken into account statistically. The annual assessments made by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not make an assessment of “Medical Error” as one of the leading causes of death, which has so far kept this potent problem behind the curtains.
Makary confirms that medical errors cause around 150,000 deaths each year, and asks the CDC to change the way it gathers data. This was through open message along with the study.
According to CDC, here’s the manner by which different conditions stacked up that same year:
- Heart disease – 614,348
- Cancer – 591,699
- Medical error – 251,454
- Chronic lower respiratory disease – 147,101
- Accidents – 136,053
- Stroke – 133,103
- Alzheimer’s – 93,541
- Diabetes – 76,488
- Flu/pneumonia – 55,227
- Kidney disease – 48,146
It’s obvious that our so-called saviours of humanity, i.e. physicians, don’t want to lose their reputation by stating something like this as a cause of one’s death. “This patient had to die because my spatula was rusty.” If this was the real case scenario, the doctor could easily be dragged to court by the patient’s family. But nothing can be done in this regard unless and until we can make comprehensive reporting on this situation.
It is definitely not going to be easy to put weight on this problem. However, the argument of Makary and Daniel reads as follows:
“The science of safety has matured to describe how communication breakdowns, diagnostic errors, poor judgment, and inadequate skill can directly result in patient harm and death.”
The estimated figure of 251,000 deaths mentioned earlier only includes the patients who died on the hospital bed and does not include the estimate of those patients who died after they were sent home by the doctors despite being severely ill. Thus, the estimate is only the first half of the story and there is a much bigger fish to catch.
Now the real problem arising is how to improve reporting on these situations. As the data gathered from BMJ suggests, few options can be taken into account for better reporting. The researchers revealed that “the science behind medical errors would improve if data was shared internationally and nationally.”
The BMJ report explains:
“Instead of simply requiring cause of death, death certificates could contain an extra field asking whether a preventable complication stemming from the patient’s medical care contributed to the death.”
This brilliant idea is highly supported by the concerned citizens and has so far produced an 89% response rate. However, this is not the only out-of-box solution to this problem. Another reliable though more expensive solution to this problem is to recruit an independent investigation council with the power to investigate the deaths caused in hospital independently, without any give-or-take situation with the physicians and other staff members.
As they say, tongue has no bones in it so we can speak as we wish to but the real challenge here is to implement these ideas into reality and be the change. As long as this assessment remains a written theory, doctors aren’t going to be held accountable for the things they do.
A case study presented in BMJ describes how a woman was made to go through a series of unnecessary tests by a physician and how a needle used in one of these tests pierced her liver, eventually leading to her death due to rupture. This incident remained an untold story because the physician reported cardiovascular disease as the cause of her death.
Makary adds: “Incidence rates for deaths directly attributable to medical care gone away haven’t been recognised in any standardised method for collecting national statistics.”
The estimated rate of annual deaths due to medical errors seems to be rising higher and higher each year. The rise of deaths due to medical errors not long ago ranged from 44,000 to 195,000 but recently the scope of this situation recorded the range from 210,000 to 400,000.
Makary admits that doctors are human and they could make mistakes, but the system shouldn’t keep on perpetuating them. He says:
“I think doctors and nurses and other medical professionals are the heroes of the patient safety movement and come up with creative innovations to fix the problems. But they need the support from the system to solve these problems and to help us help improve the quality of care.“
The British Medical Journal finally concludes with the statement, “Although we cannot eliminate human error, we can better measure the problem to design safer systems mitigating its frequency, visibility, and consequences.”
“Are medical errors really the third most common cause of death in the U.S.?” (Science Based Medicine)
“Researchers: Medical errors now third leading cause of death in United States” (The Washington Post)
“Why Are Medical Mistakes Our Third Leading Cause of Death?” (Huffington Post)
U. S. Congressman-Elect Tells Constituents Vaccines May Cause Autism
- The Facts:
Congressman-Elect Mark Green told his constituents not only that he believes there may be a causal relationship between vaccines and autism, but that the Centers for Disease Control has 'fraudulently managed' their research data on vaccine safety.
- Reflect On:
Does the unusually bold statements of a public official against the CDC's vaccine safety narrative represent the next step in our getting to the truth about vaccines?
If you are someone who has been following the vaccine/autism debate for a while, you are no doubt aware that public figures rarely take on the Big Pharma-CDC Axis, as they are prone to face serious and debilitating consequences at their own peril. Doctors like Andrew Wakefield, who famously published a study in 1998 in The Lancet that linked the MMR vaccine to autism, experienced the full weight of the medical establishment muscle when sales of the MMR vaccine were threatened.
As far as Western Medicine is concerned, Dr. Wakefield’s study has been ‘debunked’ as a result of their concerted campaign to say and do whatever they could to invalidate his main point by attacking ancillary facts that really had nothing to do with the evidence. You can read our recent article ‘A Statistically Strong Relationship Has Been Found Between The MMR Vaccine & Autism‘ to see how Dr. Brian Hooker has resurrected the study to make an argument in favor of the strong correlation found in the study between the MMR vaccine and autism, and judge for yourself.
While the majority of people probably believe that the safety of vaccines has been proven, the veils of mainstream deception are starting to get threadbare. And with this, whistleblowers, researchers and other challengers to the mainstream notion are starting to get bolder and more forthright. Researcher Judy Mikovits and others like her paved the way by standing firmly in the truth of her research and refusing to buckle under the pressure and coercion of the Western Medical Establishment to recant studies that are threatening to the pharmaceutical industry, as detailed in the article ‘Researcher Jailed After Uncovering Deadly Virus Delivered Through Human Vaccines.’
Congressman-Elect Makes Bold Claim
Still, researchers are one thing. Politicians are a whole different kettle of fish. It is still a relatively new occurrence that a politician could speak out against the vaccine industry and not be committing political suicide and open him or herself up to massive attacks from the Western Medical Establishment. It was helpful, perhaps even groundbreaking, that Donald Trump staked his claim on this matter while campaigning for the presidency:
“When I was growing up, autism wasn’t really a factor, and now all of a sudden, it’s an epidemic. Everybody has their theory. My theory, and I study it because I have young children, my theory is the shots. We’ve giving these massive injections at one time, and I really think it does something to the children.” (source)
Now, according to this article in the Tennessean, Congressman-Elect Mark Green told his constituents not only that he believes there may be a causal relationship between vaccines and autism, he suggests the Centers for Disease Control has ‘fraudulently managed’ the research data that the CDC uses to say there is no link between vaccines and autism. As the video below confirms, Green, who by the way is also a licensed doctor, is truly throwing down the gauntlet against the CDC.
“Let me say this about autism. I have committed to people in my community, up in Montgomery County, to stand on the CDC’s desk and get the real data on vaccines. Because there is some concern that the rise in autism is the result of the preservatives that are in our vaccines.
As a physician, I can make that argument and I can look at it academically and make the argument against the CDC, if they really want to engage me on it. But it appears some of that data has been, honestly, maybe fraudulently managed. So we’ve got to go up there and stand against that and make sure we get that fixed, that issue addressed.”
The challenges to the official narrative that vaccines are proven to be safe and do not correlate with the incidence of autism is like chipping away at an old brick wall. With each brick that is removed, more and more people see the holes in the mainstream narrative, and opponents to vaccine safety are becoming bolder and more direct with their challenges. I believe that in the not-so-distant future we will look back to this time and history and be amazed that it took us so long to see through the industry-sponsored fraud of vaccine safety.
“5G: The Most Censored Story Of 2018” – Journalist Masterfully Educates Houston City Council
- The Facts:
Derrick Broze, a journalist and activist recently presented to Houston about the new proposed 5G network. He points to multiple studies and scientists outlining serious health concerns for all.
- Reflect On:
What can you do to mitigate this? There are solutions presented in the article but are you taking any? How can our regulatory agencies approve a technology that's so harmful to human biology? What is going on here?
The 5G network is new, and it’s being accepted, approved and implemented already without any appropriate safety testing nor discussion with the public.
Recent research has revealed that the frequencies utilized in crowd control weapons are the same as the frequencies used in the 5G network, and there is absolutely no question about the fact that these electromagnetic frequencies impact our biology in multiple harmful ways. With more than 2000 peer-reviewed studies on the subject, thousands of scientists raising multiple causes for concern, hundreds of scientists petitioning the United Nations, and absolutely no oversight, regulation or safety testing, how is it that this type of thing is legal and allowed to be approved?
Well, the 5G, and the entire global network of wireless technology is controlled by a few people and corporations. This highlights the relationship that western corporations have with government regulatory agencies. These corporations sit above the government, and through lobbying, corporations provide instructions to government regulatory agencies. Our regulatory health agencies are a cesspool of corruption as well, so much to the point where those who work within these agencies are actually starting to have a shift in consciousness and are speaking out. The problem has become so big and widespread that they cannot remain silent. The SPIDER papers from multiple CDC scientists was an excellent example, outlining the grave concern about the CDC’s relationship with corporations and the stranglehold these corporations have over them.
Multiple countries around the world have banned WiFi and the building of cell phone towers near primary schools and nurseries, among many other places due to the evidence that shows they are not safe and can implicate the health of young children and adults.
Dr. Devra Lee Davis, founding director of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health Trust stated:
“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers,”
Journalist Presents to Houston City Council
That’s why the video below is so important, it’s a video of Derrick Broze, founder of the Conscious Resistance network. Not only are scientists speaking out about this issue, and continuing to publish eye-opening research, much of which can be found at The Environmental Health Trust, but citizens and activists are getting involved too.
The speech below takes place at a hearing in Houston. This, like so many other health issues we are facing, is important to raise awareness about together. The more people speaking up and creating awareness, the more chances we have of that this awareness leads to action or at the very least, a deep realization by council members that they are being bullied by corporations, much like we’re seeing in France.
A Little More On 5G
Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician and professor also recently gave her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. She says:
Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects…5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.” – Goldberg
You can watch her testimony and read more about it here.
Again, if you want to look at the science/research, a good place to start is with the Environmental Health Trust.
There are multiple solutions for reducing your exposure to EMF radiation. You could have a wired internet connection at home, which is actually faster. You could unplug your devices before bed, you can purchase electromagnetic radiation shielded clothing from multiple providers. You can also purchase small devices that go right on your phone that help protect against this radiation. Do your research on ‘EMF protection devices’ to find what works for you.
You could also mitigate some effects by living a more healthy lifestyle. This includes diet, nature exposure, limiting screen and phone time and other wellness practices.
The key thing here is to recognize that, in a world where our voice is constantly being silenced and information is swept under the rug for the sake of profit and control (among other reasons), we do still have a voice, and we have to use it.
We are so caught up in our own lives, doing our own thing that we’ve neglected the planet and fail to even look into what’s going on. We’ve given our consciousness away to others who are manipulating it. It’s time to take it back, to wake up, and to start thinking for ourselves instead of relying on a group of powerful people to disseminate information.
A Statistically Strong Relationship Has Been Found Between The MMR Vaccine & Autism
- The Facts:
Dr. Brian Hooker, one of multiple people who received committed data from a CDC senior scientists regarding a 2005 MMR autism vaccine study has done a reanalysis that clearly shows a statistically significant relationship.
- Reflect On:
Why are negative aspects and important research/testimony regarding vaccines completely ignored? Why are people believing that vaccines are safe and effective if all of the evidence points otherwise? Why is the only response ridicule?
After four long years, CHD Board Member, Dr. Brian Hooker‘sreanalysis of the CDC’s MMR-autism data from the original DeStefano et al. 2004 Pediatrics paper has been republished in the Winter 2018 Edition of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. The data, when properly analyzed, using the CDC’s own study protocol, show a strong, statistically significant relationship between the timing of the first MMR vaccine and autism, specifically in African American males. In addition, a relationship also exists in the timing of the MMR vaccine and those individuals who were diagnosed with autism without mental retardation. These relationships call into question the conclusion of the original DeStefano et al. 2004 paper which dismissed a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
Main Points from Reanalysis:
- The rate of autism diagnoses has increased alarmingly in the U.S., and is about 25 percent higher in black children. Boys are far more likely than girls to receive this diagnosis.
- As early as 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had data showing an increased rate of autism diagnoses in black male school children in Atlanta who received their first measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination before 36 months of age.
- The original publication concerning the data downplayed the association, and no follow-up was conducted.
- Dr. Hooker noted that the CDC deviated from its original data analysis plan, possibly because of unwanted results.
- The relationship loses its statistical significance if the analysis is restricted to children with a Georgia birth certificate, which decreases the sample size by about 40 percent.
- Dr. Hooker reanalyzed the same data set using the same methodology of conditional logistic regression but didn’t exclude children lacking a Georgia birth certificate.
- By stratifying data for African-American males by birth year, Dr. Hooker also found a statistically significant higher risk of an autism diagnosis in children who had received the first MMR vaccine 1 year earlier, only in children born in 1990 or later. Thimerosal exposure increased in the early 1990s, and it was not removed from most pediatric vaccines until 2001-2004. Dr. Hooker suggests the possibility that there may be some interaction between increased mercury exposure and early MMR vaccination. Further study would be needed to explore this possibility.
- Dr. Hooker’s interest was sparked, he reports, by communication with a CDC whistleblower, a senior scientist, who had retained some of the original analyses.
- Dr. Hooker concludes that failure to follow-up on these observations represents a huge lost opportunity to understand possible reasons for the enormous increase in this devastating neurological disability.
Introduction from Dr. Hooker’s article:
“This study is a re-analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data pertaining to the relationship of autism incidence and the age at which children got their first measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. Statistically significant relationships were observed when African-American males were considered separately while looking at those individuals who were vaccinated prior to and after a 36-month age cut-off. CDC officials observed very similar relationships as early as November 2001, but failed to report them in their final publication. In addition, a relationship is seen when specifically considering children who received a diagnosis of autism without mental retardation. Although this was reported in the original 2004 paper, it was not discussed, nor was any follow-up study conducted. Preliminary results also suggest the possibility of a synergism between thimerosal exposure and MMR timing leading to a greater risk of autism.”
Conclusion from Dr. Hooker’s article:
“The first data set used by DeStefano et.al represents a huge lost opportunity to understand any role between the timing of the first MMR vaccine and autism. The re-analysis presented here elucidates effects that should at least merit further investigation. Specifically, increased risks of earlier vaccination are observed for African-American males and among cases of autism without MR. Both phenomena deserve additional study that could yield important clues regarding the current enormous increase in autism.”
Dr. Hooker’s Reanalysis of CDC Data on Autism Incidence and Time of First MMR Vaccination was published December 7, 2018 in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Important Reminder From Collective Evolution
Dr. William Thompson (senior CDC scientist), who is mentioned above as co-author of this study, blew the whistle and admitted that he was pressured to omit statistically significant data, and that there is a connection between this vaccine and autism. He released this statement in an official capacity, as explained by the Congressman in the video below. This story was an has been completely ignored by mainstream media.
Dr. Hooker and Thompson were in touch, Hooker was the one who did the reanalysis as you can see above.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
“5G: The Most Censored Story Of 2018” – Journalist Masterfully Educates Houston City Council
The 5G network is new, and it’s being accepted, approved and implemented already without any appropriate safety testing nor discussion...
Half A Billion Fewer Animals Were Killed Per Year Since 2007 Because People Are Eating Less Meat
Have you transitioned to a plant-based diet? Do you make an effort to reduce the amount of animal products you...