- The Facts:
A set of cartoons that depicts what real love looks like has been presented. The collection was put together by the wonderful people at Brightside.
- Reflect On:
These cartoons do not mean to insult anyone or make anybody feel like they are not giving real love. They are also useful in providing insight into how much empathy we have, and how much we ourselves may be lacking in our own lives.
We live in a time where the world of dating and relationships has never been so convoluted. Gone are the days where someone had to muster up the courage to approach someone that caught their eye, and here (seemingly to stay) are the days of swiping right to twenty potential partners in a matter of minutes.
While the ease of connectivity is cool, the major downside (to some) seems to be a shift from a focus on building a genuine relationship to locating a quick f*** buddy. It’s an interesting reality to be a part of to say the least, and it’s hard to believe the new style of dating isn’t a major contributor to marriage rates hitting an all-time low in the United States.
As a hopeless romantic at heart, I was happy to come across a series of cartoons that play on the seemingly shrinking perspective on love. The collection was put together by the wonderful people at Brightside outlining the difference between real love and passion. Here are the 15 images with my takeaways from them:
It’s always easy to appreciate another’s beauty when a lot of time and effort is put into every aspect of their appearance. It’s another thing to see and appreciate it when they are instead in their more natural state. We are all always beautiful and true love tends to emphasize that.
Conflict is a natural part of every relationship. It is our reaction to it that tends to differentiate the fickle from the committed.
Just like online dating, the world of social media has added an entirely new dynamic to relationships. As much as online displays of affection can be wonderful, taking the time to also do them in a more personal and intimate setting tends to be that much more powerful and heartfelt.
Intimacy is a fun part of every relationship, but how it differs in genuine love is that it isn’t always the main motive operating behind every interaction.
We’ve all experienced dates like this at some point in our lives. We find ourselves sitting across the table from a prospective partner and can’t help but make our mind drift as they talk about something we cannot connect to. All relationships will always have their differences but the ones backed by love will always be two-way conversations filled with care.
Decision making is a two person game that works best if both parties come together in making the choice, rather than only one simply pushing their desires.
We all have long and tiring days away from one another. True love tends to recognize that and find ways to help alleviate that hardship rather than add to it unnecessarily.
A willingness to provide care in a time of need is always a wonderful sign suggesting that love is truly in the mix. A lack of it can suggest that the person is either too preoccupied with their own well-being or they only have one thing in mind when they do spend time with you.
The language we choose when communicating with a significant other can go a long way in how the relationship unfolds. Love tends to recognize the best way to approach things.
Life is always going to challenge relationships with distance and time apart. How we choose to respond to that will often be a good indicator of how serious the relationship is.
Not being able to keep your hands off one another is always a fun part of every new relationship, but you know it’s love when you are able to pick your spots and know that it will be worth your while (and more comfortable for others) when that time comes.
Even if your partner’s love language is the receiving of gifts, it should never be done to prove your feelings for someone. Gift giving is a wonderful thing, especially when it comes about naturally and has a lot of thought behind it.
Again, intimacy is an awesome part of every relationship, but it should never be the only part. Connect with a partner who loves non-intimate time with you just as much and there will still be plenty of time where the ‘Do Not Disturb’ sign still gets used.
A great indicator of love is when you naturally find yourself excited to share something with your partner. Their reaction at times can even become more interesting to you than your own.
With the nature of dating these days it’s hard not to easily wander into thoughts about there simply being someone else if this doesn’t work out. True love doesn’t even consider it.
This is how each of the 15 cartoons spoke to me, how do they speak to you?
Ready to change your life today? Get my FREE eBook on 5 Quick Daily Hacks for a GENUINELY Happier Life sent straight to your inbox within 48 hours by signing up here. And for more brutally honest personal development content designed for those who actually want to change, be sure to subscribe to my YouTube Channel and to follow me on Facebook.
UAF 9/11 Study Concludes “Fires in WTC Could Not Have Caused” Building 7 To Collapse
- The Facts:
The final report of an extensive four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process concludes that WTC 7 could not have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the official NIST explanation claims.
- Reflect On:
Does it seem like full disclosure in many areas, including 9/11 truth, are being held back in order to burst into public awareness simultaneously?
The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced on March 25th that the final report from researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks on the destruction of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001 has been completed. And as expected, it debunks the official story:
The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
The final report, entitled A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Final Report, includes clarifications and supplemental text based on public comments submitted in response to a draft report released by UAF and AE911Truth on September 3, 2019.
The UAF team’s final report is the result of an extensive four-year computer modeling effort that was followed by a robust peer review process. The peer review included dozens of public comments as well as external review by two independent experts, Dr. Gregory Szuladzinski of Analytical Service Company, a leading expert in structural mechanics and finite element modeling, and Dr. Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University and a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Richard Gage, president and founder of AE911Truth, said that “It is now incumbent upon the building community, the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.”
Of course, asking for a new full-scale investigation has always been the mandate for AE911Truth. One would suspect that if an investigation has not been launched by now, when a majority of the public believe something is being hidden from them about 9/11, no amount of proof about the falsity of the official statement will be able to get the ball rolling.
Still, the work that continues to be done by AE911Truth and its allies among the 9/11 victims’ families keeps this issue in the spotlight, and reminds us that important facts about 9/11 have yet to be revealed, facts that question the very nature and motivations of our government and other powerful institutions. The 9/11 activists will now use the findings in the report as part of a formal “request for correction” that the group plans to submit to NIST in the coming days. Richard Gage noted,
“The indisputable errors documented in our request for correction will give NIST no way out of correcting its deeply flawed report and reversing its conclusion that fires were the cause of the collapse.”
An admission by NIST that their conclusions about the reasons for the WTC 7 collapse is tantamount to an admission that explosives had been pre-planted in this building for this event, so we shouldn’t hold our breath. It would bring down the entire house of cards that is the official 9/11 narrative.
As I mentioned in a previous article ‘The Implosion Of Building 7 Remains The Irrefutable “Smoking Gun” Of A 9/11 Inside Job,’ the presumption of a controlled demolition would dictate that WTC Building 7 must have been slated to be hit by a plane like the other 2 towers, as part of the master plan of the perpetrators. When that was part of the plan was botched, they decided to ‘pull it,’ in the recorded words of the building’s owner Larry Silverstein. The lame “offices fires” explanation, something that had never happened before in the world to a high-rise building, was the only one that was left for them to use.
Truth is coming, about 9/11, about JFK, about hidden technology, ETs and about a hundred other things. It seems to me that full disclosures of all of these have been held up, or are creeping along very slowly, as if they were being loaded into a cannon for one huge explosion of truth that is set to have a profound impact on our collective consciousness. Rather than being impatient for one particular disclosure or another, I believe it’s best to try to see a pattern that relates to the readiness of the collective mind, and do our part to prepare ourselves.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Wins Key Court Case In Dakota Access Pipeline Resistance
- The Facts:
A key victory came yesterday for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe as a Washington DC court ruled the Army Corps of Engineers must perform an Environmental Impact Statement to show the Dakota Access pipeline will not negatively affect the tribe's land.
- Reflect On:
Are we seeing further shifts in the old paradigm of money first and environment second? Are we seeing the power of relentlessly standing up for what you feel will make humanity and nature thrive?
This is a huge victory for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North Dakota. Their relentless energy towards having a full environmental impact statement (EIS) done with regards to the Dakota Access Pipeline that would run through their land and potentially impact their water supply, has finally paid off. This will bring the future of the Dakota Access pipeline into question entirely.
A Washington DC court ruled that the US army corps of engineers must conduct a full EIS given that their existing permits violated the National Environmental Policy Act (Nepa).
“After years of commitment to defending our water and earth, we welcome this news of a significant legal win,” said the tribal chairman, Mike Faith. “It’s humbling to see how actions we took to defend our ancestral homeland continue to inspire national conversations about how our choices ultimately affect this planet.”
You may recall from 2016, the Sioux Tribe rallied and inspired millions all over the world to help in getting behind the movement to raise awareness about the environmental impact of this pipeline. People travelled from all over the world to join the tribe on the ‘front lines’ as clashes sometimes became violent between water protectors and police, as well as pipeline workers.
I recall being down in North Dakota covering this story and was amazed by the sheer amount of people coming to support, as well as the efforts police were taking to silence journalists from covering the story. Cell phone jammers were used to stop those on-site from live streaming what was going on. Independent media were the only form of media in Standing Rock for months until eventually, mainstream media showed up. There appeared to be a long-standing solidarity within mainstream media to portray water protectors as violent and to avoid telling their side of the story when it came to the pipeline. This was why independent media was so important at that time.
In December 2016, the Obama administration denied permits for the pipeline to cross the Missouri River and effectively ordered a full EIS to be done in order to determine what alternative routes could be taken as well as what impact the pipeline may have on the tribe’s treaty rights. Yet, during the first week of Donald Trump’s presidency, he signed an executive order to expedite construction of the pipeline. Construction of the 1,200-mile pipeline was completed in June 2017.
Not long after, the tribe challenged the permits and won. The Army corps of engineers were ordered to redo its environmental analysis, but they did so without taking into consideration tribal concerns or expert analysis. This was likely to allow it’s the transport of oil to continue until they were again sued.
Finally, as this Wednesday, federal judge James Boasberg determined that the environmental analysis by both the companies behind the pipeline and the corps was severely lacking, and the track record of Sunoco when it comes to oil spills is not promising, and “does not inspire confidence”, he added.
The fresh court-mandated EIS will be more in-depth than the assessment already completed by the corps – and could take years to complete. Next, the court will decide if the pipeline will be shut down while the EIS is being completed and until the EIS is approved.
“This validates everything the tribe has been saying all along about the risk of oil spills to the people of Standing Rock,” said Jan Hasselman, an EarthJustice attorney.
The news of this Standing Rock victory may fall on distracted ears and minds at the moment considering the current global focus on the Coronavirus pandemic, but this is a big victory that shows the power of collective action and moving to stand up to actions of those who do not make the entirety of human ‘thrivability’ a part of their paradigm, but who instead operate from a space of disconnection and capitalization.
This news comes as I recently released my latest film Regenerate to everyone for free. The film re-examines our current mainstream approach to climate change and instead looks at our relationship to land, life, nature, money and each other as a whole. I propose that it is here where we will find the solutions we are looking for to truly allow our environment and each other, to thrive. You can check out the trailer below, and watch the full film here.
How We Can Regenerate Our Environment & Planet (Documentary)
- The Facts:
New documentary called Regenerate: Beyond The C02 Narrative explores how we can truly regenerate our environment. The current mainstream focus on C02 is not the answer.
- Reflect On:
Are we viewing the earth as a mechanical machine? Are we living in a society built on disconnection? Do we value maintaining the status quo more than creating a thriving life for all?
I have a new film I want to share with you, one that I was very passionate about creating because I believe it has the power to truly change the way we think about our environment.
I’ve been researching the topic of climate change for over 10 years, and the one thing I can honestly tell you, no matter what political side you are on or what you think the science says: the topic is very dizzying. No, it’s not as simple as the oil companies are faking science to show dangers to our climate are not as bad. No, it’s not as simple as lowering CO2 emissions, in fact, that is an incredibly misleading narrative. What we have to do is much different than that.
One thing I will say is this, many of the current propositions we see from governments, companies and mainstream media are designed to work within our economy. Economy first, environment second. They are also designed not to have humanity question their relationship with things like nature, money, life, who we are and why we are even here. They are designed to maintain the status quo. For that reason, they are often linear, mechanical ideas that disregard the true nature of the earth and the environment.
Those who have really gone deeply into the subject of climate change see this very quickly: you cannot simply solve our climate woes by planting more trees or lowering CO2 emissions, as you are just looking at one TINY aspect to the puzzle, and this direction won’t actually help the planet, it will only make us think we are helping.
Coming to these realizations over the last 10 years is what inspired me to create a film that would unite people. It’s a film that doesn’t argue about who’s to blame, what the causes of climate change are and so forth, it’s instead a film that looks at the core of the issue, and how we can actually create the changes that are needed at this time.
In short, the biggest challenge we face right now is that we live in a mindset and paradigm of disconnection and linear, mechanical thinking. This has led to the creation of a world that takes only individual parts into consideration, and not the whole. This thinking provides the experience of what it looks like to create from disconnected and destructive points of view. Sifting out of this thinking and state of being, into one of connection, is the challenge before us. When we do this, it will begin to reshape policy, choices, actions and creations that influence our world, way of living and how we relate to the earth.
Due to the Coronavirus lockdown everyone is experiencing right now at home, I’ve decided to make the film Regenerate: Beyond The CO2 Narrative, free for everyone to watch.
Below is a trailer to check out the film. If you wish to watch this film entirely, click here.
Multiple Stanford Medical Professors Question If COVID-19 Is Really “As Deadly As They Say”
Right now, tensions are high as several countries enforce strict lockdown measures, closing all non-essential businesses and encouraging or mandating that...
Some New York Hospitals Are Now Treating Coronavirus With High Dose Vitamin C
Good news, reports indicate that a hospital in the US has finally begun using Vitamin C to treat coronavirus patients,...