Everyone in mainstream media seems to be pondering the same question: Will President Donald Trump be impeached? For a man who was supposedly “democratically elected” as the 45th President of the United States, he seems to have developed quite a negative image and spurred public outrage across the country. Mainstream media has been doing nothing short of attacking his character and every move (though sometimes for good reason), yet they did not provide the same level of attention to Hillary Clinton and the endless crimes she committed.
At the end of the day, Americans voluntarily chose Trump to be their President; so, in some way, Trump serves as a reflection of the public as a whole. With that being the case, why would the public turn on him, right after electing him? Perhaps it’s less of the public’s decision and more so the elite’s, as many members of the elite have been funding the anti-Trump movement. To me, the real question here is: Has Trump done anything that actually merits impeachment, and which members of the elite are hoping this occurs?
-->FREE Report: Discover the Top 10 Nutrient Deficiencies, including key signs you may be deficient in them and what you can do about it Click here to learn more!
Impeachment: What Does That Actually Mean?
Impeachment refers to when a President is forced to involuntarily step down from their Presidential position. In regards to impeachment in the U.S., the process is followed through by Congress, giving them the power to essentially “fire” the President if they can prove wrongdoing.
First, the House of Representatives can impeach the President with a majority ruling. Once that happens, the process then moves to the Senate, in which a trial must be held with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Lastly, there must be a two-thirds vote from the Senate in favour of removing the President on any account. Then, the Vice President assumes power as President (let’s keep in mind that this means Mike Pence would become President if Trump is impeached).
Impeachment has only occurred a handful of times in the history of U.S. Presidents (or almost happened). More recent examples would be when President Richard Nixon resigned from his position after it seemed as though he was about to be impeached in the 70s, and then when President Bill Clinton was almost impeached in 1998. Nixon was allegedly involved in cover-ups and, more notably, was complicit in the break-in at the Democratic National Committee offices in the Watergate Hotel. Clinton, on the other hand, committed perjury by lying under oath about an extramarital affair he had with another White House employee.
It’s interesting to note that Clinton’s near-impeachment arose largely because he lied under oath about an affair, instead of the other wrongdoings he committed. He was a huge supporter of the war on drugs and the “three strike rule,” which was essentially a strategy to put more black people in prison, and also held dangerously close ties to the elite, yet the media chose to address his marital problems instead of the potential high-level corruption that was going on in the White House at the time. You can read more about this in our CE article here.
In order for impeachment to occur, the Constitution addresses two specific crimes, treason and bribery, that would merit impeachment and removal from the Oval Office. The Constitution also specifies that “other high crimes and misdemeanors” could be reason enough to propose impeachment, though this is a vague statement.
However, when Gerald Ford was House minority leader, he said, “An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history,” so who really know what exactly merits impeachment.
It’s important to note that the public, the people who supposedly “decide who gets elected as President,” don’t get a say in the matter; it’s just the “officials’ opinions” they care about. American politics is a system designed to serve the elite and the people inside of it, not the citizens. Americans don’t even really have voting power — it’s the Electoral College who control who gets elected, and who knows who controls them? So I ask you, how is this a democratic system?
What Would Merit Trump’s Impeachment?
In order for Trump to be impeached, we know that he would have to commit some sort of crime that the powers that be deem punishable. It’s crucial for the elite to consider it as grounds for punishment, because we know that numerous Presidents have technically engaged in crimes or misdemeanours and have not been punished for them because it would expose high-level corruption. For example, numerous Presidents have held financial dealings with terrorist groups, like the Obama administration selling arms to ISIS, and even Hillary Clinton’s involvement with an elite pedophile ring was swept under the rug. All of these acts weren’t investigated, nor were they even recognized as wrongdoings or reported on by mainstream media.
So far, numerous mainstream media (MSM) outlets are claiming that Trump firing former FBI Director James Comey is considered grounds for impeachment. MSM has taken the perspective that Trump only fired Comey to prevent any ongoing investigations on Russia being responsible for his victory in the recent U.S. presidential election. Of course, we know that Russia wasn’t actually involved, as it wasn’t “Russian hackers” who released the DNC emails to Wikileaks, but rather a DNC whistleblower, Seth Rich.
Nevertheless, this story is proving to be increasingly popular amongst the mainstream media, which makes sense given that many of their viewers probably don’t know the truth about Hillary Clinton and what those DNC emails contained, as MSM didn’t cover the hack extensively. For those of you who read CE’s content on the DNC emails, Comey’s arrest may not have come as a shock to you, but to those who were uninformed this may have come as a surprise.
In addition to Comey’s compliance in covering up the DNC emails, he also failed to investigate any Pizzagate claims. You may be familiar with the PizzaGate scandal, which allegedly unearthed a very high-level elitist global pedophile ring the U.S. government was involved in.
It emerged when Wikileaks released tens of thousands of emails from the former White House Chief of Staff under Bill Clinton, Jon Podesta, who also served as Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. It’s because of these emails that many claimed Jon Podesta was a part of these child trafficking rings as well. You can read more about this in our CE article here.
This isn’t the first time she was accused of being involved with pedophilia, as former U.S. State Department official Steve Pieczenik explained that the Clintons and many more “have been a major part and participant of what’s called the Lolita Express, which is a plane owned by Mr. Jeff Epstein, a wealthy multi-millionaire who flies down to the Bahamas and allows Bill and Hillary Clinton to engage in sex with minors — that is called Pedophilia” (source).
Despite all of the evidence against Clinton proving that she was likely involved in numerous high crimes, the FBI chose not to investigate any of that. When you look at the whole picture, it would be more surprising if Trump chose not to fire Comey. If we can’t trust the FBI Director to actually investigate high crimes, then what’s the point of paying this organization countless taxpayer dollars in the first place?
Despite all of this, MSM is still running with the story that President Trump could be impeached over this. MSM has been very careful in creating their image of being anti-Trump, continuously showing their support for Clinton throughout the electoral period. By constantly running anti-Trump stories like these, it’s essentially mentally preparing the public for the very real possibility of impeachment.
Perhaps the better question here is, why is MSM gunning for Trump to be impeached and who would benefit from his impeachment?
The Elite Is Funding the Anti-Trump Movement
One of the biggest players behind the anti-Trump movement is George Soros, a key member of the shadow government disguised as a philanthropic billionaire. His donations seem heartfelt and meaningful, but if you look a little closer, you’ll realize that every donation he makes has an ulterior motive behind it, helping to secure his control over the political landscape and in turn profit from it.
Soros has donated money to a number of “left” groups such as the Tides Foundation, Center for American Progress, and the Democracy Alliance to influence campaign finance laws. As a result, any democratic politicians that don’t support or express “progressive narrative” either receive cuts to their funding or are targeted by the media. This would be easy for Soros to influence, as he uses OSF to funnel money into Media Matters, which directly contributes to mainstream media outlets such as NBC and the New York Times (source).
Democracy Alliance has already been challenging the Trump administration on a number of subjects, sparking tons of controversy, which is directly tied to Soros. Soros also heavily funded many of the “Black Lives Matters” movements. Don’t get me wrong — I’m a strong advocate for equality and am happy to see people supporting one another. However, Soros’ investments in anti-discrimination movements seem to be politically driven, intent on stirring up conflict. Three liberal donor networks and foundations with ties to billionaire George Soros have also joined forces to create a new fund to fight President Donald Trump, The Emergent Fund.
Plus, the Women’s March, which was held around the same time as Trump’s inaugeration and was widely known as an anti-Trump march, was also largely funded by Soros. As it turns out, Soros, one of Clinton’s greatest supporters and largest donors, has funded or holds close relationships with at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood and the National Resource Defense Council, both of which are anti-Trump. Other “Women’s March” organizations Soros is tied to include MoveOn.org, which is pro-Clinton, the National Action Network, which has ties to the DNC, American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch.
Prior to the march, at least 33% of the “women of colour” who originally protested the Trump election in the streets worked at organizations funded by Soros. It is clear to me that some of these gender and racial inspired protests are not really about achieving equal rights. There is a clear plan being played out here by the elite, which is to get us to fight with each other and misplace our frustrations. They are literally tricking people into thinking they’re fighting for equality, when these are actually just movements created by the elite to distract us and create conflict.
Hillary Clinton has also launched a political organization aimed at funding anti-Trump movements. Clinton is actually openly funding organizations that sway left in order to undermine her former opponent. This seems to be a trend amongst the elite, using “left” views to shield their corruption and increase the division between the left and right sides of politics, as if more progressive opinions will somehow right their wrongdoings.
The left, which used to be defined by more progressive views and staunch equality, has slowly shifted toward imperialism and globalization. The left has slowly become more supportive of military force and “soft” power, allowing the big banks and the elite to gain more control over societies. They’ve convinced society that it’s socially acceptable to literally fight for equality, increasing violence and separatism.
This seems a little backwards: How could society be tricked into thinking that war and violence can be justified in the name of “equality” and “anti-racism”? Well, when you think about previous false flag terrorist attacks like 9/11 or even what’s going on in Syria, it starts to make more sense. The U.S. launched missiles at Syria after an alleged chemical attack in an effort to “stop violence,” when in reality those missiles just resulted in more death and destruction.
To clarify, I’m not necessarily saying that Trump shouldn’t be impeached eventually. However, keep in mind that if he is impeached, someone will replace him, which will continue to perpetuate this same system. America got the President it “deserved,” because when you act like slaves searching for a single leader to follow, you get a master like Trump in return.
Democracy gives you the illusion of freedom and “human rights,” because only without an overarching, elite-serving government could you truly have these things. So, even if you believe that Trump should be impeached, that doesn’t mean that the system will be fixed. As long as you continue to support the “religion” of government, this system will continually be perpetuated.
Judge Orders The Dakota Access Pipeline To Be Shut Down
- The Facts:
On Monday, A U.S. District Court ordered Energy Transfer LP to shut down and empty their pipeline, known as the Dakota Access Pipeline.
- Reflect On:
Why do we continue to use outdated and unnecessary means for energy production. Why is our economy an oil based economy when it doesn't have to be? Why do we have solutions that never see the light of day?
What Happened: On Monday, A U.S. District Court ordered Energy Transfer LP to shut down and empty their pipeline, known as the Dakota Access Pipeline. It just so happens to be their largest one, and it also represents a big win for Native American’s and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, as well as citizens from all over the world who have fought the line’s route access through a critical water supply.
It’s amazing how many years have already passed since there was a mass gathering in North Dakota to stop this pipeline. Corporate America brought in the police to try and disperse the gathering. One night, a small plane spraying unknown substances flew over the gathering at night, I know this because I was there, along with CE founder Joe Martino. There were SWAT teams everywhere. All of this for a peaceful gathering? We spent days covering the story, and all we saw was intimidation, violence, and psychological warfare tactics in order to disperse the crowd so that the company could continue building their pipeline.
This always seems to happen to peaceful protestors.
Corporate America eventually got what they wanted. Many people were thrown in jail, people were injured, all resulting from a peaceful protest. The gathering was shut down and the fight to stop the pipeline went to court, during which time the pipeline was in full operation.
Bloomberg is reporting that the pipeline must be shut down by August 5th.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said a crucial federal permit for Dakota Access fell too far short of National Environmental Policy Act requirements to allow the pipeline to continue operating while regulators conduct a broader analysis the court ordered in a previous decision. The ruling scraps a critical permit from the Army Corps of Engineers, and requires the pipeline to end its three-year run of delivering oil from North Dakota shale fields to an Illinois oil hub. Judge James E. Boasberg said Dakota Access must shut down the pipeline and empty it of oil by Aug. 5.(source)
We will have to wait and see if The Army Corps and Justice Department intends to appeal the decision.
Why This Matters
This goes to show what we can do when we come together. Despite the fact that it’s taken years, and damage has been done, look what’s happened, it’s been halted once again. That being said, at the time the pipeline was being built and during the period it was moving oil, it was quite clear that citizens around the entire planet were against this. So I ask you, do we live in a democracy? Do citizens really have any influence at all on decision making, or is our consciousness manipulated to accept certain measures, like pipelines, as necessary? Why doesn’t planet Earth come first? Why does it take cutting through so much red ape, and so much time to try and stop such measures? What kind of system have we created for ourselves? One that protects the corporations and punishes the citizenry and mother Earth?
We don’t have to accept this.
The coronavirus is another great example of what we are capable of. Despite the fact that we were forced into lockdown by governments, billions of people, together, still collectively did it. The point is, we can accomplish great things together, as one. Imagine if billions of people around the world decided the world should shut down for one week in order to, clean up our oceans for example.
Why don’t our governments do that?
We can do anything, we have unlimited potential. We are in a time where we are being asked to wake up, come together, re-imagine our reality, discuss it, explore it, build it and use our potential to create a human experience where everybody can thrive, including mother Earth. And yes, it’s possible, we have the solutions and they’ve been available for years. The only issue is human consciousness, and the barriers we’ve built that prevent these solutions from manifesting.
Bill Gates: ‘Certificates For The Vaccinated Will Be Created To Help Facilitate Global Travel’
- The Facts:
A few months ago, Bill Gates hinted to the idea that those who aren't vaccinated may not be able to travel.
- Reflect On:
Do we really live in a democracy when so many decisions are made without the consent of the majority of the citizenry?
According to Bill Gates,
“Eventually what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a recovered person, who’s a vaccinated person […] Because you don’t want people moving around the world where you’ll have some countries that won’t have it under control, sadly. You don’t want to completely block off the ability for people to go there and come back and move around. So eventually there will be this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up.” (source)
He expressed his predictions in an interview (linked above) that took place a couple of months ago. In the interview he also suggested that people should have some sort of digital identification that shows their vaccination status, and that people without this type of “proof” wouldn’t be able to travel.
Whether these intentions are for the coronavirus vaccine or perhaps some other medication down the road, this pandemic is a great example of how close we can come and are coming to mandating ‘medicine.’
It’s no secret that vaccine hesitancy is at all all time high right now, there is a growing hesitancy among scientists and physicians as well, which is why some of them are coming together to support informed consent in a world that continues to grow full of vaccine mandates. This was a sentiment recently expressed at the World Health Organization’s vaccine safety summit. You can read more about that here and access a link to the full conference if interested.
Vaccine hesitancy will no doubt result in a large portion of many populations that do not receive the vaccine. To me, it’s quite clear that for these reasons governments will not, and cannot fully, mandate the vaccine, but when it comes to travel and perhaps other public activities, they may do so if we continue to allow it.
Or perhaps they are still warming people up to the idea of a mandated vaccine? Are mandatory masks in public settings a precursor to a mandatory vaccine in a public setting?
Why This Matters
It’s important to recognize and acknowledge what happens when we give our power away to government health authorities. Decisions are made for us that are not always agreeable to a large minority, and in some cases sometimes it seems like a majority of the population. When it comes to vaccines, despite the fact that there are many injuries and many safety concerns, many of them are required for children to go to school.
This is why the so many people have been questioning vaccines so deeply. Regardless of what government and media say, it’s not about “pro-vax” or “anti-vax,” it’s simply about looking at the science and acknowledging the fact that vaccines are not a one size fits all product.
For example, according to a MedAlerts search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid out approximately $4 billion to compensate families of vaccine-injured children. As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
That’s just one of many examples.
Why don’t our federal health regulatory agencies acknowledge the concerns people are having about vaccines instead of simply using ridicule and character assassination? Why is there a campaign to paint those who question vaccine safety as conspiracy theorists?
For example, The Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures put out some excellent downloadable PDF’s with regards to the MMR vaccine. One of them deals with “what parents need to know about the measles vaccine” and another one presents the information that has them questioning if the MMR vaccine is safer than the measles. They point out that the chances of dying from measles and make many comparisons to the vaccine. You can can read more about that here.
Are these doctors and scientists truly just “conspiracy theorists?”
There will be a in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it. – Aldous Huxley
Not only is the comment above coming true, many of us seem to enjoy it because our consciousness is suppressed to the point where we feel it’s necessary. With vaccines, and now masks, many people feel that one has a responsibility to follow mandates because we are made to believe that it protects other people. The idea that an unvaccinated child is a danger to a vaccinated child is also very flawed. Sure, if we had vaccines that were 100 percent safe and 100 percent effective we could perhaps achieve herd immunity through a vaccine, but vaccines have been around for decades and we have not yet we still have achieved herd immunity through them.
At the end of the day, people are made to feel like they are uninformed and mistaken for questioning the status quo. Is this the type of world we want to live in? One that seems to be guarded by the ‘ministry of truth’ or, in this case, a digital authoritarian Orwellian ‘fact-checker’ that’s patrolling the internet silencing some of the world’s foremost experts on this topic? One where a view that opposes our government regulatory agencies, one that is backed by evidence, is punished and ridiculed?
What’s really going on here, and why, as a collective, do we accept it? If billions of us can come together and agree to a lockdown, or at least comply to it, then why can’t we come together for all of the other important issues that need our attention? Why do we only do what we are told to do by our governments? Why do we continue to give our power away and hand over our trust to entities that seem to be lacking connection and care? Why do we constantly rely on these entities to take care of our problems for us and make decisions for us?
Today, it’s not about executing the will of the people, it’s about controlling the will of the people and convincing them your actions are justified. This is what Bill Gates, among other very powerful people, seem to be doing right now.
The US Prosecutor Wants Prince Andrew To Speak With The FBI After Ghislaine Maxwell’s Arrest
- The Facts:
U.S. attorney Audrey Strauss, who is involved in working Ghislane Maxwell's case, welcomes Prince Andrew's co-operation with the FBI.
- Reflect On:
Will Prince Andrew be the only high profile person to go down? Could this be a dam that breaks to truly has the majority of the population questioning the character of many people in positions of power? Will this spur conscious self-governance?
What Happened: Jeffrey Epstein’s right hand person, Ghislaine Maxwell was recently arrested on charges connected to Jeffrey Epstein with regards to child sex trafficking and abuse. Now, the acting U.S. attorney Audrey Strauss, said U.S. prosecutors would “welcome Prince Andrew coming in to talk to us” during a press conference announcing the charges against Maxwell on Thursday, as many media outlets are now reporting.
“We would like to have the benefit of his statement,” Strauss told reporters. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a survivor of Epstein’s abuse, has claimed he and Maxwell trafficked her to have sex with Prince Andrew three times when she was 17 in 2001.
This isn’t the first time the Royal Family has been implicated in such activity. A member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected pedophile ring under investigation by the police in the late 1980s, a former Metropolitan police officer has said. The officer was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for national security reasons. “I was in a car with two other vice squad officers … The detective sergeant said he had just had a major child abuse investigation shut down by the CPS regarding a royal and an MP,” he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper. “He did not mention names, but he said the CPS had said it was not in the public’s interest because it ‘could destabilise national security’.”
In fact, there are many examples from many different countries within Europe that correlate with elite level pedophilia and not only sexual abuse of children, but physical abuse as well as the murder of them. Multiple Royal Families have been implicated, as well as Vatican Personnel, high ranking global leaders, politicians and more.
This is not to say all are involved, but from the outside looking in, it seems a significant amount are.
If you want to dive deeper into the topic and see more examples, you can refer to this article I published a few months ago.
We have also interviewed a survivor of elite pedophile rings like the one Epstein and Maxwell ran. Her name is Anneke Lucas and you can watch her full testimony here on CETV.
You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well.
If you want to read more about Epstein ad Maxwell, you can do that here.
Why This Is Important
Could Maxwell’s arrest bring down more high profile people? It could, and that’s why it’s important. With this, the collective would really see how far this goes and we would have the opportunity to ask ourselves why high profile people are involved, and why there is such a big cover up. Further, we could explore why we support these people making major decisions for the human race with regards to political policy that governs all aspects of life, from health, to education and more.
If politicians ad high profile individuals are in fact involved in this, which survivors of their rings commonly claim, we are giving our power over to people who are in a state where they lack empathy and connection, and are capable to doing thigs the general public would never dream of doing to others. This is why more people are starting to really explore this topic, because it changes how we go about giving our power to people like this.
Humanity is in a process of ‘Breaking the Illusion’ we have come to accept about our reality. We have been living from a collective story that states we elect good people into government, and they act in our best interest. This categorically is not the case, and part of our collective awakening to creating solutions that can make our world thrive is waking up from this illusion we have chosen to accept.
People are beginning to learn en masse that high profile figures are involved in such acts like extreme occult rituals, sex trafficking and pedophilia, and they are beginning to wonder why.
Dr. Fauci Says “Individual Institutions” May Make The Coronavirus Vaccine Mandatory
What Happened: Dr. Anthony Fauci recently explained that the US “could see individual institutions mandating a vaccine.” As of now, it...
Bill Gates: ‘Certificates For The Vaccinated Will Be Created To Help Facilitate Global Travel’
According to Bill Gates, “Eventually what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a recovered person, who’s a vaccinated...