“Imagine this scenario: Your perfectly healthy baby boy begins having 14 seizures a day, the day after receiving the Meningitis B Vaccine. You get no answers from your GP, or anybody else, for that matter. You make a video of your young boy to warn other parents that there might be something wrong with the vaccine. You think that’s only right: Let people see what happened to your boy and make their minds up on whether to opt out of that particular vaccine. You start looking into vaccines and conclude you won’t be vaccinating your child/children anymore. This results in your boy being removed from your home, because your anti-vaccine stance might harm him. Imagine it. Luke Maguire and Louise McKever don’t have to imagine that scenario. They’ve lived it for the last year.”
In the last year, Luke Maguire and his partner, Louise, have been through a living hell. Ever since their child received a new meningitis vaccine called Bexsero, which caused a massive reaction within a day of receiving it, their son had suffered from a strange new twitch.
“At the two month vaccine, Bobby developed a twitch,” Luke told radio host Richie Allen. “We knew straight away it was from the vaccines as it started that night. He was sleepy, floppy and pale. But after we alerted the nurses to the twitching, they assured us that vaccines were 100% safe.”
After receiving no help from their GP, or anyone else in the medical field, the outspoken father started sharing their experiences on Facebook with a video of Bobby having his seizures. He hoped to warn other parents that Bexsaro might be unsafe. He said it caused a quick decline in their son’s health and gave him severe epilepsy, which he did not have prior to receiving the vaccine.
After Father Spoke Out About First Vaccine Causing Issues, Social Services Threatened to Take Child
After receiving some mainstream press, the story became well-known in the UK and due to a Facebook video Luke made, went viral overseas. While Luke and Louise knew that the vaccine had caused severe harm and didn’t want to give Bobby any more, social services threatened to take Bobby away from their care if they didn’t continue to vaccinate him. Reluctantly, the parents had him vaccinated again. After this second lot, Bobby’s health deteriorated even further, which meant he was now having severe fits that sometimes lasted for minutes at a time.
Since receiving these vaccines, Bobby has visited the hospital over 55 times. Luke took to Facebook to share Bobby’s story with as many people as possible, and the family has sought help outside the medical system to try to improve their son’s health. They have been giving him organic food, have tried homeopathy and other natural remedies, and took him off dairy. Bobby’s health and seizures began to improve, and as you can see from the photo below, he looks a lot better.
Is This Where We Are Heading: Speak Out Against Vaccines and Children Will Be Removed?
Earlier this week, Luke spoke with UK radio host Richie Allen to share what has been going on since Bobby had the vaccines, and what has happened since he started to speak out about them. He also described the last few weeks’ events, which ended in police raiding their house and removing Bobby at gunpoint. Luke shared this with Richie:
One told us to be quiet, that we were making too much noise about vaccines. She told me in front of two police officers – and I have a recording of her saying this – to stop talking publicly about vaccines, then they’d leave us alone. I said to the police officer “can she say that?” and the police officer said “no, she can’t.” But by that time, I’d got the story in the newspapers.
Why should parents be threatened for speaking out about something that has happened to their child? Shouldn’t we be allowed to have a choice to say no to medical treatment, especially if it had caused issues in the first place? Shouldn’t we be allowed to voice our concerns regarding the safety of something our child has been given?
UK Judge Said In 2013 Jail Social Workers Who Take Children Away For No Reason
Whilst many people will dismiss this article and say ‘it can’t possibly be true, kids do not get removed because parents are against vaccines, or for speaking ‘badly’ about them, so ‘something’ else may be the reason for the removal. However, a top UK family Judge spoke out about social workers taking children away for no valid reasons.
Sir James Mundy said during a case back in 2013 regarding social workers who did not tell the parents why their children were being taken and adopted out, that their behaviour was ‘deplorable’ and ‘symptomatic of a deeply rooted culture in family courts’. He also accused the social workers in question of having a ‘slapdash, and ‘lackadaisical’ attitude to court orders. He then went on to suggest that in future there could be consequences dished out to these social services workers who fail to respond to court orders asking for proof on why these children are being taken away.
How frightening it is to read this, that social services are sometimes found to NOT follow proper procedure and are ignoring court orders!
It seems we have many interlinked systems that are at times rife with fraud, where the law is not being followed.
I wonder what this judge would think about this case regarding Luke and Louise’s son Bobby.
Bruises Seen on Child After Being Removed From the Home — Father Went to Take Photos, Then Social Services Phoned Police
Luke also shared that, since Bobby was taken, they have only had several short visits to see their son and are watched over the entire time. Luke also voiced his concerns about seeing bruises on his son’s body that were not there before the raid. When Luke took his phone out to take photos of the marks, social services immediately rang the police.
The video above (this is not the link for the original video but was added to YouTube after) is what started the trouble for the family. When it was sent out on Facebook it went viral, quickly amassing 3.5 million views.
There Are Concerning Issues With Bexsaro Vaccine
We must consider, is there any evidence to show that Luke may be right, that Bexsaro did cause his son’s health issues? Has it even been proven to be safe for use in infants?
In the article “Are Ineffective New Meningitis B Vaccines Causing Harm to Children?” world-renowned vaccine journalist Christina England shares some worrisome information she found in the vaccine insert, and reveals this vaccine has not been tested for use in infants: “In the UK, Bexsero is the main vaccination being recommended for babies between the ages of two and six months, a vaccine that, according to the manufacturers vaccine insert, has only been approved for individuals from the ages of 10 through to 25.”
The following image is taken from the actual Bexsero vaccine insert
Christina shared even more disturbing information from the vaccine insert, which clearly states it has not been tested for safety nor for effectiveness in children under the age of 10. In fact, if you take a look at the insert, which mentions the studies carried out, many of the people it was tested on, were aged between 13-20 years.
Adverse reaction information was only recorded for a 30 day period after the vaccine was given, which, I am sure you may agree with, is hardly long enough to prove its safety. Surely we should be studying vaccines for adverse reactions many months after they are given, or even better, for years?
In the UK, this vaccine is now given to infants starting in the first year of their life, where their body weight is incredibly low. Surely its common sense to consider; how do we know an infant can detox the vaccine chemicals that were tested in much older children and young adults?
This Is Why We Urge Parents to Demand to See the Vaccine Inserts
How can a vaccine that has not been tested for use, or for safety in infants, but instead was tested on children much older (with much larger body weights), then be given to millions of infant children? How can our health agencies, which are supposed to act with the welfare of our children as their first priority, add a vaccine to the schedule whose safety has not been proven?
We as parents must must demand to see the actual vaccine insert before we vaccinate, not just the glossy leaflet given to us. Otherwise, we will remain ignorant of the risks involved.
Australian Boy Also Taken From Home After Parents Spoke Out About Vaccines and Stopped Using Hospital Food
While the Australian family are under a gag order by the courts not to speak out about their son’s removal publicly — and I am not going to mention their names here — I urge you to take a look at this article about what happened to their child, who was also removed at gunpoint by Australian police.
The parents of this other boy have also taken to Facebook, urging people to make sure they know the risks involved in getting their children vaccinated. This family, who was not ‘anti-vaccine’ by any means and ensured their son received most of his infant vaccines, were feeding their son organic food. They also were giving him CBD oil which was helping his seizures massively decrease in severity. They also prevented him from eating hospital food, which he seemed allergic to, after discovering it contained synthetic vitamins, sugars, and non-organic milk and nothing that was ‘real food’.
The video of this child being removed from his parents, also went viral, and the disturbing footage was seen where friends of the family who were at the hospital protesting, were pepper sprayed by Australian police.
We have also just heard that a young mother of 4 children in the USA has reported that all of her children were taken from her care after a visit to the hospital for one of the children. She says that she believes that its because all four children are unvaccinated.
Please Listen to the Father’s Interview
There seems to be more and more cases of parents having their rights stripped away (you might like to check out the website medical kidnap which is as it sounds – a website dedicated to cases where parents lost their children to the hands of the medical industry) particularly when it comes to saying no to vaccines, or voicing concern about ones that have already been given.
At this stage, no one knows yet when, or if, Bobby will be returned to his parents.
Before commenting on this story, please listen to the interview with Luke speaking about what has happened to his family over this past year.
For other press articles regarding Bobby, please click here.
Johnson and Johnson have recently lost lawsuits for negligence in knowingly allowing carcinogenic substances in their talc-based hygiene products.
Are we starting to turn the page on an era where human health and safety are not the prime considerations in the manufacturing of consumer products?
We are starting to awaken to the fact that it seems to be the rule, and not the exception, that large Western corporations put profits above human health considerations. The only time they seem to give any regard to human health concerns is when their forecasts of potential lawsuits down the road would likely exceed the cost measures needed to ensure the safety of their product.
Johnson & Johnson is just one of a long line of corporate perpetrators who believed that covering up and lying about known health concerns would make better business sense than taking the time and resources to actually address those health concerns within their products.
Contaminated Baby Powder: The Height Of Indignity
One would think, regardless of an understanding that the bottom line is a priority for most private companies, that the health and safety of a nursing mother and her newborn child would be sacrosanct for any industry. The reality is that this is simply not the case, even though J&J could have mitigated this problem from the start.
Companies that mine talc are required to take extra steps to ensure the absence of asbestos in their talc. Instead, J&J allegedly went to great lengths to fake it.
Not only did the company know about the asbestos contamination, evidence suggests, but J&J also failed to warn its customers about the link between Baby Powder and cancer or replace its talc with a safer alternative. As a result, J&J guaranteed its customers’ exposure to asbestos.
And regardless of their size or numbers, asbestos fibers are lethal at any capacity. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has stressed repeatedly, there is no safe level of exposure. (source)
Baby Powder’s contamination with asbestos (a mineral that naturally occurs near talc) has long been the subject of lawsuits. But only in recent years has evidence begun to unravel J&J’s defense – that the company had no idea – and threatened its success in lawsuits to come.
In March, a California jury awarded $29 million to Terry Leavitt, a woman who said that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s talcum-powder-based products caused her terminal mesothelioma. Environmental scientist James Webber testified in her high-profile California trial and made these observations:
During several hours on the stand, Webber explained how he ran tests that showed “clear” evidence of asbestos contamination in the mines from which J&J sourced talc.
“The testing I have seen [shows] that it was present at least as early as 1971 and up through the late 1990s,” said Webber, who ran an asbestos laboratory in New York state.
Despite denying it publicly, J&J had observed this contamination in internal memos. Its notes dismissed the amount of asbestos in its talc as “but a trace,” Webber alleged. But that was just an optimistic interpretation of superficial testing, he said: the tests used methods too weak to detect microscopic asbestos fibers. Webber insisted the actual tests results revealed there could be millions of asbestos fibers per gram of talc.
And J&J’s inaccurate reports were allegedly only the tip of the iceberg. In some instances, Webber said, photos attached to J&J’s reports revealed that “they had been seeing it and not reporting it.” (source)
And It’s Getting Worse
The $29 million verdict, in California Superior Court in Oakland, was the latest defeat for the healthcare conglomerate facing more than 13,000 talc-related lawsuits nationwide. And things may be getting even worse for J&J, according to ZeroHedge:
Johnson & Johnson shares are down over 5% after Bloomberg reports that, according to people with knowledge of the matter, the U.S. Justice Department is pursuing a criminal investigation into whether Johnson & Johnson lied to the public about the possible cancer risks of its talcum powder…
Now, a grand jury in Washington is examining documents related to what company officials knew about any carcinogens in their products, the people said.
It seems as though corporations have long been willing to take the calculated risk of short-cuts and denials instead of ensuring that their products are safe for public use. My suspicion is that a part of our collective awakening process will be issuing in a new business paradigm in which human health and safety become paramount.
Multiple brands of prescription infant formula were found to contain high levels of aluminum.
Should we be questioning the quality of products that come from pharmaceutical production? Do we veer away from natural methods of raising children more than we should? At what cost?
You may not think aluminum is a big deal, but it is. For anybody who has looked into aluminum toxicology, it’s quite clear and apparent that it has no place inside of any living biological organism. Putting it simply, it wreaks havoc on our biology. High amounts of aluminum have been found in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease, with experts in the field believing that aluminum brain accumulation may be one of the main causes of Alzheimer’s disease.
It’s also been discovered within the brains of MS patients, and some of the highest aluminum content ever recorded in brain tissue has also been discovered in people with autism. Aluminum is associated with several diseases. But an adult body can do a great job of flushing out aluminum.
Despite the fact that aluminum has no place within earth’s biota, it’s still present in many of our medications, our food, and even in the water that we drink due to contamination since the industrial revolution. Aluminum inside the body is a new phenomenon and still understudied. Again, there is a threshold, and aluminum that is injected via vaccines doesn’t exit the body–there is strong evidence that it remains inside the body and ends up in distant organs and eventually inside of the brain. If you want to access more studies on that topic, you can read this article I published that provides them and goes into more detail. You can also watch this interview with Christopher Exley, where he also points to that fact.
A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has shown that multiple popular infant prescriptions are contaminated with aluminum. You may be asking how much aluminum, but the authors make it a point to stress that there are no safe amounts of aluminum levels that can be inside of a human body, let alone a newborn baby. That being said, the amounts found are listed within the abstract of the study:
Historical and recent data demonstrate that off-the-shelf infant formulas are heavily contaminated with aluminium. The origin of this contamination remains to be elucidated though may be imported via ingredients, packaging and processing. Specialised infant formulas exist to address health issues, such as low birth weight, allergy or intolerance and medical conditions, such as renal insufficiency. The aluminium content of these prescription infant formulas is measured here for the first time. We obtained 24 prescription infant formulas through a paediatric clinic and measured their total aluminium content by transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry following microwave assisted acid/peroxide digestion. The aluminium content of ready-to-drink formulas ranged from 49.9 (33.7) to 1956.3 (111.0) μg/L. The most heavily contaminated products were those designed as nutritional supplements for infants struggling to gain weight. The aluminium content of powdered formulas ranged from 0.27 (0.04) to 3.27 (0.19) μg/g. The most heavily contaminated products tended to be those addressing allergies and intolerance. Prescription infant formulas are contaminated with aluminium.
Another very important point made right off the bat by the authors:
Human exposure to aluminium is a serious health concern. Aluminium exposure in infants is understandably a burgeoning issue. While infant exposure to aluminium continues to be documented, its consequences, immediate and in the future, have received only scant attention and research is required to understand the biological availability of aluminium through formula feeding. For example, how much aluminium is absorbed across the neonate gut and its subsequent fate, including excretion.
There is already too much aluminium in infant formulas and herein we have measured its content in a large number of prescription formulas, products which are fed to vulnerable infants in their first months of life. Many of these products are heavily contaminated with aluminium.
As for the specific infant formulas, you can refer to the study. The researchers obtained 24 prescription infant formulas via the Paediatric Clinic of Russells Hall Hospital in Dudley, United Kingdom. The ready-to-drink and powdered products were new, ready-to-be used and unopened samples. These formulas are for babies with some sort of growth restriction, like for preterm infants or infants who have poor weight gain. There were also powdered formulas for allergies and intolerances and powdered formulas with additional amino acids.
The authors contacted each manufacturer and expressed that they denied knowing that there was any aluminum in their products, which means it’s still a mystery as to their source. The authors hypothesize on a number of ways that aluminum could be entering into the formulas.
In their conclusion, the authors emphasize that:
Where possible, breast milk feeding should be prioritised, as the aluminium content of breast milk is invariably an order of magnitude lower than in formula feeds. Where infant formulas are the only source of nutrition for many infants in their first weeks and months of life, aluminium ingested in formula feeds will be the major contributor to their body burden of aluminium. The last thing that vulnerable infants fed specialised formulas for their specific nutritional/medicinal need is additional aluminium in their diet.
There is a lot of information out there on how a person can detox from aluminum and other heavy metals. There are multiple studies, and based on what I’ve looked into, water with high amounts of Silica are effective in draining aluminum out of your body and brain. Herbs like cilantro and substances like chlorella and spirulina are also great for removing some metals. The information is out there, so be sure to do your research.
It’s concerning to think about what these corporations are doing. Again, aluminum should hold no place in our society, it should’ve remained well below our surface as part of the Earth’s crust for a reason. It wasn’t until humans began digging it out and using it for a number of things, irresponsibly I might add, that we started to see the health implications which still go largely ignored by the medical community.
In fact, heavy metal accumulation and detoxification of aluminum haven’t been addressed at all, which is odd given the fact that heavy metal accumulation is linked to a variety of diseases.
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital in Singapore is a case study in what can happen when nature-inspired design is applied to the medical setting to promote healing.
There are many studies that show the healing benefits of nature and the effects it has on our health & well-being. What if all hospitals integrated a more conscious approach to healing?
Lush garden views and natural landscapes aren’t usually the first thing you envision when you think of hospitals, but Khoo Teck Puat Hospital in Singapore is changing all of that.
When it comes to reenvisioning healthcare and the mental state of those who are admitted, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital is really advancing how we care for those who have fallen ill. Whether it is due to lack of prior proper care, one’s diet & lifestyle, or a stagnancy to one’s energy creating blockages — and in turn illness — it is important that we look at this field and industry (medical/healthcare) as one of the most crucial for shifting humanity.
The Green Treatment
As MindBodyGreen reports, “In 2005, CPG Corporate, a Singapore-based design firm, was tasked with creating a hospital that actually lowered visitors’ blood pressure. ‘How do we challenge the idea of a hospital to deinstitutionalize it and make it look, smell, and feel, unlike a hospital?’ Jerry Ong Chin-Po, an architect who worked on the project, told mbg of the initial challenge. ‘We felt the best way to do it was to integrate nature into the space.'”
The hospital, which opened its doors in 2010 and now serves 800,000 residents in northern Singapore, has masked the smell of medicine and chemicals with over 700 species of fragrant native plants. In the lobby, sounds of machines are drowned out by bird species in the central courtyard. And instead of walking through sterile white hallways, patients, caretakers, and the occasional butterfly navigate the space on outdoor bridges wrapped in greenery.
In Singapore, medical buildings have multiple tiers of patient rooms (it’s part of how the country maintains its famously cheap health care). Some are private and have air conditioning; others have up to five beds and rely on natural ventilation. In order to ensure that all patients feel comfortable—regardless of how much they’re paying to be there—Chin-Po’s team again leaned on nature. They installed new windows that could be opened wider to allow for more airflow and made sure that every patient could see greenery from their bed, even if it was just a planter box on the other side of their window.
At mealtimes, patients are given organic food grown in a massive rooftop garden, and everyone fills their plates with fruits and veggies on the weekly, hospital-wide Meatless Mondays. ‘We always bring this idea of creating a total healing environment,’ Chin-Po says. ‘Not just for the patients but for the caregivers and staff as well. It’s all part of the whole system.’
This is the healing power of nature and community.
Image by Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
And so the next question is, with all of the greenery, community and natural light, are patients healing more rapidly at this futuristic hospital? Well, it is reported that while there is still not sufficient evidence to back this claim, Chin-Po says that anecdotally, patients seem to appreciate the hospital’s unique design and are actually willing to pay more to go there than other hospitals in the area.
And, though it’s not extensive, there is a body of research showing that greenery and natural light do aid in recovery. One 2008 study found that patients who had plants in their rooms had lower blood pressure and reported less pain, anxiety, and fatigue than patients who didn’t. Another one back from 1984 concluded that hospital rooms that had windows overlooking nature helped patients recover from surgery quicker than ones that faced brick walls. Outside of a clinical setting, spending time around nature has been shown to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stress.
As more of those around us seem to fall ill, it is important to look at alternative ways of healing. Whether it is holistic, alternative, or simply nature itself, it is steps like this hospital is taking that are really going to create the shift we need as a collective. We are lovers of the outdoors by nature, and though our current society and system seem to have us forgetting to step outside and ground, it is key to our longevity on this planet.
From the Sun itself being our best source of vitamin D to the very oxygen we breathe being gifted to us through trees, we owe a lot to nature.
Remember, sick or not, it is in our best interest to take time out in nature to nurture both our Soul & our bodies. This hospital is just the beginning of a great remembrance back to real self care.