Connect with us

Alternative News

Send This To Eminem & Any Other Person Who Is Insulting Donald Trump

Published

on

Neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton is fit to be president, neither was Obama and many other president’s down the line. They’ve all followed the will of their masters, and that’s the main point of this article.

advertisement - learn more

Donald Trump’s presidency will no doubt go down in history, for several reasons. One is the fact that he was able to beat out Hillary Clinton, despite that she was able to ‘rig’ her way into contention past Bernie Sanders through fraudulent activities, as disclosed by Wikileaks and more.   A great example of that were the DNC emails that exposed a rigged election, which was also blamed on Russia and Wikileaks, despite evidence that the leaks actually came from inside the United States. You can read more of our articles about that here.

-->Facebook Just Shut Us Down: We need your help in taking our power back from big tech, to overcome censorship and the attack on free speech. Click here to help!

Hillary was no doubt the next pick for the global elite to continue forth with the agenda of the American Empire, which they’ve been pushing for years, one that now has the reputation of imposing their will on multiple countries through various means in order to install or establish a political and economic framework for their own benefit. America has turned into a ‘corporatocracy,’ far from a democracy, and much ‘evil’ doing is disguised as good will, a term commonly used would be ‘globalization.’

If you follow the money, it’s not hard to see. 

Journalist Abby Martin did a great video on how Hillary Clinton’s political machine really operated. You can check that out here.

In the meantime, panic and fear have been instilled into the masses,  via false flag terrorism, events like 9/11, the war on drugs and terror, and more, all of which are used to justify the infiltration of countries, like Iraq, for ulterior motives, and take away our rights here back home. The  current surveillance state is one of many great examples.

advertisement - learn more

The fact remains, as alluded to by multiple insiders and scientific studies like this, that there was never a good reason to do so (infiltrate other countries), as emphasized a few years ago by former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and US General, Wesley Clark.

He told the world that the US has had plans to invade Syria (and several other countries) for no good reason, for a long time. Simply because the US has a powerful military and can “take down governments.”

As a result of propaganda and “Uncle Sam,” a great deal of patriotism has been sparked inside the heart’s of many, who are made to believe that supporting the mass military machine is something dignified, something necessary, something very brave and patriotic about.

A great quote from Mark Twain comes to mind here,

“The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.”

– Mark Twain (source)

All of the “great” minds throughout history have emphasized this fact, in light of countless examples of evidence. The “conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” and “Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government.”

The Dalai Lama has also made some great points about the mass military machine, and how we are all brainwashed into acceptance. You can read more about that and see his comments here.

This “invisible” government, is exactly why those with an influential voice must not target Donald Trump the way they do. A great example was Eminem pouring it on Donald Trump a few months ago with a freestyle. When popular figures among the masses speak up about political (and other) real world global issues, they have a tremendous influence, but just imagine if they used their voice to call out those who really “run” things on our planet. Those above the government and into the corporations (health, finance, entertainment, big food & pharma) all the way past them into the upper echelons of the global financial institutions, the Trilaterals, CFR’s, The IMF’s, the Rothschild’s, the Rockefellers’s and beyond even these previously mentioned…

That being said, it’s also important to remember that we uphold the current human experience, the masses, and if we choose to work together collectively, we can change the experience at any time. Playing the blame game is usually, but it’s important that we at least see what is going on here.

It’s obvious to see why Donald Trump is not fit to be president of the United States, while at the same time acknowledging the fact that, when it comes to Hillary, we are dealing with corruption and one who does the will of her masters and the highest levels. Whether it be alleged pedophilia ring activity, or supporting the infiltration of various countries through unethical means, and the killing of millions of people, these are all very important points to be made.

The point is, our entire modern day political system is broken and doesn’t really represent a democracy. The will of the people is not met, but rather influenced, used and taken in a direction of powerful people with a greedy, egoic agenda.

It seems like voting makes no difference.

Hillary Clinton was not supposed lose this election, and it’s clear that Trump was a disruptor in the plans of a group of ‘higher ups.’

This fact has been brought up in mainstream political talk within the past couple of years, with figures like Vladimir Putin telling the world what exactly happens when you’re elected president. Stating that ‘men in dark suits’ come in and tell you what’s going to be done. He made this point when explaining why US presidents, during the election race, make promises that they’re unable to fulfil. It’s because there is a ‘higher power.’ Putin is one of many who have told the world, on multiple occasions, that they are using imaginary and mythical threats to create a justification for certain actions, to gain political and economic advantages.

“So a person is elected, he comes with his ideas. Then people with briefcases come to visit him, well dressed, in dark suits kind of like mine. Except instead of a red tie it’s black or navy. And then they explain what to do, and the whole rhetoric changes, you see? This happens from one administration to the next.” – Putin

You can watch a video of him making these comments here.

So what do we have today? Assumptions of alleged Russian hacking and Wikileak ties to the Russians. Because Hillary Clinton lost the election, the United States needed something to try and get Donald Trump impeached.

This narrative has been countered by several people from within the agency, stating that it’s just another “false flag” type of situation in which they will desperately try to create evidence for.

William Binney, a high ranking NSA Whislte-Blower, is one of many examples making this point.

We are witnessing what could be completely fake news, a story that was manufactured. How many times have we been misled? How many stories have we been made to believe are real, but are actually fake? How many times have we heard fake explanations for real events?

It’s important to keep in mind that mainstream news stories are changed, by the government, to serve the interests of “national security.” Multiple documents via FOIA have shown intelligence agency influence over mainstream media, a close relationship, as well as the need to completely fabricate stories. On top of this, we have insiders themselves, world-renowned journalists of these networks ‘blowing the whistle’ on corporate and government collusion.

I’ve been a journalist for about 25 years, and I was educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public. But seeing right now within the last months how the German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia — this is a point of no return and I’m going to stand up and say it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do and have done in the past because they are bribed to betray the people, not only in Germany, all over Europe. –  Dr. Udo Ulfkotte

He also stated in that interview, as have many others, that mainstream news outlets are commonly paid by governments, intelligence agencies and big corporations to put out certain stories.

We are witnessing a war between Donald Trump and the mainstream for a reason, because the powerful (who represent mainstream media, and own it), did not want him to win. They will continue to bash and slander his name, meanwhile, those who are considered war criminals by many, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, are made to look like saints.

It just doesn’t make sense, and it really exposes the priority of mainstream media and how it doesn’t convey what’s happening in the world, but perhaps creates it.

Donald Trump was not puppeteered by this ‘secret government’ prior to his election, but the agenda of those who are much more powerful seems to continue forward in many aspects. And this is because Trump has now found out what really happens behind the scenes, as eluded to earlier in the article with the Putin example, and even he himself (Trump) has succumbed to the will of the ‘Deep State,’ it seems.

The US is always blaming and citing problems in other countries, that might not even exist, threats that are completely made up and manufactured all the time, it seems.

We recently interviewed historian Richard Dolan on the subject, who explained very well why he believed Donald Trump may have, what seems to be clear now, been ‘check-mated’ by this deep state. You can access that interview and see his explanation here.

Again, keep in mind that this has been a problem for decades that has affected almost all the presidencies. Here’s another great quote to exemplify this point,

“Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great staffs, both of the old parties have ganged aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests which use them in martialling [sic] to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.” – T. Roosevelt

So, All of You Celebrities

There are countless points to go through when discussing such topics, and so many examples that can be used. The point is, if you’re a celebrity and would like to speak up on such issues, it’s important that for those of you who have a voice, to mention the hidden mechanisms that seem to control US politics.

Sure, the fact that Donald Trump is even involved does suggest he is simply another puppet, and it’s become clear that he is, but perhaps a puppet of a different kind that represents a struggle between those who play within the ‘Deep States’ rules.

See our stance on Donald Trump here.

It seems as if it’s time to really leave politics behind, and create something new that is really in the best interests of the people and all life on this planet. One thing is certain, politics does not do that, and this entire system is not interested in the well-being, freedom, and abundance for all. If the ‘leadership’ of this planet really were interested in that, and through their actions it seems quite clear that they’re all just putting on a charade. The revelations that’ve been made connected to both Trump Clinton, and further down the line show that these are not who we should be calling our leaders.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― R. Buckminster Fuller

 

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

Vancouver Council Votes Against Mandatory Mask Mandate: They’re Not Required

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Vancouver, Canada will not have a required mask policy in civic facilities, and instead will simply recommend that people wear them.

  • Reflect On:

    Should governments recommend what they feel we should do and present the science instead of forcing certain measures on the population that many people and health professionals clearly disagree with?

What Happened: The city of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada will not mandate masks inside city buildings and will “strongly encourage” people to wear them instead. This is a bold move as many cities across the globe have mandatory mask measures in place.

The proposal by Counc. Sarah Kirby-Yung, which would have required masks inside city buildings, was opposed by more than a dozen speakers who pleaded with the city council to vote against it.

“Please consider our forefathers fought for our freedom, and if we release that choice, it’s the first step towards a dictatorship,” said one speaker according to City News. “Masks are used as weapons and they have certainly been used as weapons against me and others to silence and marginalize us and it’s not fair.”

According to Coun. Christine Boyle, public health experts encourage wearing masks, but a mandatory policy is not needed.

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Positive Association Found Amongst COVID Deaths & Flu Shot Rates Worldwide In Elderly

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A recently published paper has found a positive association between COVID-19 deaths and influenza vaccination rates in elderly people worldwide.

  • Reflect On:

    Why does vaccine hesitancy continue to grow worldwide? What's going on? What information/factors are contributing to this hesitancy?

What Happened: A recently published study in PeerJ  by Christian Wehenkel, a Professor at Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango in Mexico, has found a positive association between COVID-19 deaths and influenza vaccination rates in elderly people worldwide.

According to the study, “The results showed a positive association between COVID-19 deaths and IVR (influenza vaccination rate) of people ≥65 years-old. There is a significant increase in COVID-19 deaths from eastern to western regions in the world. Further exploration is needed to explain these findings, and additional work on this line of research may lead to prevention of deaths associated with COVID-19.”

To determine this association, data sets from 39 countries with more than half a million people were analyzed.

The study was published on October 1st, and two weeks later a note from the publisher appeared atop the paper emphasizing that correlation does not equal causation, and that this paper “should not be taken to suggest that receiving the influenza vaccination results in an increased risk of death for an individual with COVID-19 as there may be confounding factors at play.”

The paper provides evidence from others which have recently been published that ponder if the flu shot could increase ones chance of contracting and dying from COVID-19.

For example, this study published in April of 2020, reported a negative correlation between influenza vaccination rates (IVRs) and COVID-19 related mortality and morbidity. Marín-Hernández, Schwartz & Nixon (2020) also showed epidemiological evidence of an association between higher influenza vaccine uptake by elderly people and lower percentage of COVID-19 deaths in Italy, which directly contradicts the author’s own findings and suggests that the flu shot may help prevent COVID-19 related deaths.

He goes on to mention another study:

In a study analyzing 92,664 clinically and molecularly confirmed COVID-19 cases in Brazil, Fink et al. (2020) reported that patients who received a recent flu vaccine experienced on average 17% lower odds of death. Moreover, Pawlowski et al. (2020) analyzed the immunization records of 137,037 individuals who tested positive in a SARS-CoV-2 PCR. They found that polio, Hemophilus influenzae type-B, measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13), geriatric flu, and hepatitis A/hepatitis B (HepA-HepB) vaccines, which had been administered in the past 1, 2, and 5 years, were associated with decreased SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.

So, its important to mention that correlations between the flu vaccine have also found that it may decrease ones chance of deaths from COVID-19.

But are there studies that have shown an increased chance of death or contracting other respiratory viruses as a result of getting the flu shot? Yes.

That’s also discussed in the paper. For example, he mentions a paper published in 2018:

In a study with 6,120 subjects, Wolff (2020) reported that influenza vaccination was significantly associated with a higher risk of some other respiratory diseases, due to virus interference. In a specific examination of non-influenza viruses, the odds of coronavirus infection (but not the COVID-19 virus) in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher, when compared to unvaccinated individuals (odds ratio = 1.36).

The study above found the flu shot to increase the risk of other coronaviruses among those who had been vaccinated for influenza by 36 percent. The study was conducted prior to COVID-19, so it’s not included and only applies to pre-existing coronaviruses. The study also found an even higher chance of contracting human metapneumovirus amongst those who had received the flu shot.

Below are some more studies regarding the flu shot and viral infections that hint to the same idea.

  • 2018 CDC study (Rikin et al 2018) found that flu shots increase the risk of non-flu acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs), including coronavirus, in children.
  • A 2011 Australian study (Kelly et al 2011) found that flu shots doubled the risk for non-flu viral lung infections.
  • 2012 Hong Kong study (Cowling et al 2012) found that flu shots increase the risk for non-flu respiratory infections by 4.4 times.
  • 2017 study (Mawson et al 2017) found vaccinated children were 5.9 times more likely to suffer pneumonia than their unvaccinated peers.

Why This Is Important: We live in an age where vaccinations are heavily marketed. We’ve seen this with the flu shot time and time again and we are also living in an age where a push for more mandated vaccines seems to be growing.

Dr. Peter Doshi is an associate editor at The BMJ (British Medical Journal) and also an assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. He published a paper in The BMJ titled “Influenza: Marketing Vaccines By Marketing Disease.”  In it,  he points out that the CDC pledges “to base all public health decisions on the highest quality of scientific data, openly and objectively derived,” and how this isn’t the case when it comes to the flu vaccine and its marketing. He stresses that “the vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and that “the threat of influenza seems to be overstated.”

This is a touchy subject that dives into medical ethics and the connections that big pharmaceutical companies have with our federal health regulatory agencies and health associations. Vaccines are a multi billion dollar industry.

At a recent World Health Organization conference on vaccine safety, it was expressed that vaccine hesitancy is growing at quite a fast pace, especially among doctors who are now becoming hesitant to recommend certain vaccines on the schedule. You can read more about that and find links to the conference here.

We have to ask ourselves, why is this happening? Is it because people and professionals are becoming aware of certain information that warrants the freedom of choice? Should freedom of choice with regards to what we put in our body always remain? Are we really protecting the “herd” by taking these actions?

In a 2014 analysis in the Oregon Law Review by New York University (NYU) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E. Zachary (who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry), the authors show that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “have not attained herd immunity for any childhood disease.” It is time, they suggest, to cast aside coercion in favor of voluntary choice.

When it comes to the flu shot, I put more information and science as to why so many people seem to refuse it, in this article if interested.

The University of California is currently being sued for mandating the flu shot for all staff, faculty and students. A judge has prevented them from doing so as a result until a decision has been made. You can read more about that here.

In South Korea, 48 people have now died after receiving the flu shot this season causing a lot of controversy. You can read more about that here.

The Takeaway: There are many concerns with vaccines, and vaccine injury is one of them. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid more than $4 billion to families of vaccine injured children. A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million.

Should these statistics alone warrant the freedom of choice? Should the government have the ability to force us into measures, or would it simply be better for them to present the science, make recommendations and urge people to follow them? When the citizenry is forced and coerced into certain actions, sometimes under the guise of good-will, there always seems to be a tremendous amount of uproar and people who disagree. Why are these people silenced? Why are they censored? Why are they ridiculed? Why don’t independent health organizations receive the same voice and reach that government and state “owned” or organizations do? What’s going on here? Do we really live in a free, open and transparent world or are we simply subjected to massive amounts of perception manipulation?

When it come to the flu shot there is plenty of information on both sides of the coin that point to its effectiveness, and on the other hand there is information that points to the complete opposite. When something is not 100 percent clear, freedom of choice in all places should always remain, in my opinion.

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Some South Korean Doctors & Politicians Call To Stop Flu Shots After 48 People Die

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The number of South Koreans who have died after getting flu shots has risen to 48, but health authorities in South Korea have found no link between the vaccine and the deaths.

  • Reflect On:

    Is the flu shot as safe as it's marketed to be?

What Happened: It’s that time of year and flu shot programs are rolling out across the globe. The number of South Koreans who have died after getting the flu shot has now risen to 48 and some South Korean doctors and politicians have called to stop flu shots as a result, according to Reuters. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) has decided not to stop the program, and that flu vaccines would continue to be given and will reduce the chance of having simultaneous epidemics in the era of COVID-19.

Health authorities in South Korea have explained that they’ve found no direct link between these deaths and the shots. KDCA Director Jeong Eun-kyung said, “After reviewing death cases so far, it is not the time to suspend a flu vaccination programme since vaccination is very crucial this year, considering…the COVID-19 outbreaks.”

According to Reuters, “Some initial autopsy results from the police and the National Forensic Service showed that 13 people died of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and other disorders not caused by the vaccination.”

The South Korean government is hopeful to vaccinate approximately 30 million of the country’s 54 million people.

Concerns Some People Have With The Flu Shot: One concern many people seem to have is the worry of a severe adverse reaction.

Dr. Alvin Moss, MD and professor at the West Virginia University School of Medicine emphasizes in this video:

The flu vaccine happens to be the vaccine that causes the most injury in this country. The vaccine injury compensation program, 40 percent of all vaccinations in this country are flu shots, but 60 percent of all the compensations are for the flu vaccine. So a disproportionate number of  vaccine related injuries are the flu shot.

Moss is one of many who believe that the flu vaccine is not as effective as it’s been marketed to be. For example,  A study recently published in Global Advances In Health & Medicine titled “Ascorbate as Prophylaxis and Therapy for COVID-19—Update From Shanghai and U.S. Medical Institutions outlines the following:

Recently outlined A recent consensus statement from a group of renowned infectious disease clinicians observed that vaccine programs have proven ill-suited to the fast-changing viruses underlying these illnesses, with efficacy ranging from 19% to 54% in the past few years.

Dr. Peter Doshi is an associate editor at The BMJ (British Medical Journal)  published a paper in The BMJ titled “Influenza: Marketing Vaccines By Marketing Disease.”  In it,  he points out that the CDC pledges “to base all public health decisions on the highest quality of scientific data, openly and objectively derived,” and how this isn’t the case when it comes to the flu vaccine and its marketing. He stresses that “the vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and that “the threat of influenza seems to be overstated.”

These are just a few examples out of many claiming that the flu shot has not really been effective, opposing others that claim it is.  Mercury that’s still present in some flu shots also seems to be a concern.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid more than $4 billion to families of vaccine injured children. A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million.

Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project stated at a World Health Organization (WHO) conference that more doctors are starting to be hesitant when it comes to recommending vaccines.

The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen… still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider…

This is no secret, and actions against mandates are being taken. The University of California was recently sued for making the flu shot mandatory. That trial will begin soon, and you can read more about it here, and find information regarding the claim that the flu shot can help in the times of COVID-19.

The Takeaway: We are living in an age of extreme censorship of information, no matter how credible or how much evidence is provided, information that goes against the grain always seems to receive a harsh backlash from mainstream media as well as social media outlets. Why is there a digital fact checker patrolling the internet? Should people not have the right to examine information openly and freely and determine for themselves what is and what isn’t?

As far as vaccines are concerned, despite the fact that there are many safety issues the scientific community  is bringing up, a push for vaccine mandates continues and the idea that we are protecting other people is usually the narrative that’s pushed hard. Vaccine skepticism is growing at a fast pace among people of all professions, and people aren’t stupid. There’s a reason why more and more people are starting to question what we’ve been told for years, and those reasons should be acknowledged and openly discussed amongst people on both sides of the coin.

Become Part of CE's Inner Circle

Collective Evolution is one of the world's fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness. Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV.

Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!