Connect with us

General

MIT Professor Emeritus Claims Chemical Attacks In Syria Are Not Assad’s Doing

Avatar

Published

on

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Terror and war have been heavily part of our planet for the last century, and despite the fact that these types of activities don’t seem to be feel natural for the average, empathetic human being, they are still carried out as the world looks on in disbelief and heart break. Who truly wants war?

advertisement - learn more

At the end of the day, these are human beings are carrying out the will of another, who will never fight themselves, and this appears to be a form of brainwashing. The purpose of this article is to explore what really is going on and why this is important for us to realize before we can expect change to happen.

--> Our Journalism Is Moving - Our investigative journalism and reporting is moving to our new brand called The Pulse. Click here to stay informed.

We are suggesting that these attacks are conducted by a group of people, working for another group of powerful people, but are blamed on another. In this case, President Bashar Al-Assad and the Syrian government are the ones getting  blamed for an attack they likely did not commit. Some even go as far as saying these are staged, in all sense of that term, with regards to this latest attack, a Russian foreign Minister said: “We have irrefutable evidence that this was yet another performance and that security services of a country which is trying to be in the frontlines of the Russophobic campaign were involved in this performance.”

A lot of things are being said, and it’s up to you to do your research if you’re truly interested in finding out what is really going on.

With that understanding, note that this is still considered a false flag. An event that did in fact happen but one that isn’t as it seems so as to push forward an agenda. False flag events comprise both of real and staged events.

Understanding How & Why

Within the past 10 years alone, it’s amazing how much information has emerged from credible sources about how what we are being told by mainstream media outlets with regards to major events, especially international geopolitics, is simply false.

advertisement - learn more

It’s not hard to believe, take the governments relationship with media, for example. A CIA document states that the CIA task force “now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,” and that “this has helped us turn some ‘intelligence failure’ stories into ‘intelligence success’ stories, and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.” Furthermore, it explains how the agency has “persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods.” We’ve also seen multiple award winning journalists come out and blow the whistle on government and corporate influence in the media.


Related CE Articles:

3 Popular Mainstream Media Journalists Come Together To Tell The Truth About Tell Lie Vision

Declassified CIA Documents Shows Agencies Control Over Mainstream Media & Academia


9/11 could perhaps be one of the best and most well known examples. Many people, including academics, and politicians have voiced their concern that the Deep State (within the US government) carried out these attacks in order to justify the invasion of the Middle East. This is why at least half of the American population didn’t believe the official government explanation of the events which transpired that day, not because they are ‘conspiracy theorists,’ but because of all of the evidence. More than a decade later we have multiple peer-reviewed studies emerge from scientists and engineers emphasizing to the world that there is no possible way that planes could have taken down WTC 1 and 2, don’t forget about 7. Nothing at all hit that building.

“The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf.” – Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics, spoken at the International Conference on the New World Order, organized and sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation.

What Happened In Syria

This is why talking about what happened in Syria is important because we know these events are used to infiltrate and supposedly bring democracy to these countries under distress. But again, are we putting them in distress so we can go in and invade, making it look completely justifiable, and even humanitarian in the eyes of the masses? Is this what our ‘leaders’ are really doing?

Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, will be the first to tell you:

But many others within the realm of global politics and academia will do the same,  like Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Theodore Postol, who wrote a preliminary review of the US government with regards to the attack that took place last year.

It’s a six-page report, that, according to him, “unambiguously shows that the assumption in the White House report that there was no tampering with the alleged site of the sarin release is not correct.” Postol mentions that this assumption was “totally unjustified…and no competent intelligence analyst would have agreed that this assumption was valid.”

He is stating that the official report on the attack released by the US Government was not done so by intelligent, good hearted and competent intelligence experts, “unless they were motivated by factors other than concerns about the accuracy of the report.”

These are quite emotionally charged allegations, and it’s obviously something many people, even within the United States, are feeling strongly about, despite the complete opposite rhetoric from mainstream media.

And we are getting the same kind of buzz with this years story too.

His key proof came from a series of photographs of the crater where the container holding the sarin gas was supposedly air-dropped. In the photograph, several men inspecting the site are wearing medical gloves and loose clothing.

Again, this has nothing to do with the attack that just took place. But the same thing is happening, Assad and others are denying their involvement, and there is currently an international investigation into what really took place.

He is one of many who raised doubts about the quality of Washington’s intelligence assessment about last years attacks, so it’s going to be interesting to see what happens this year. There will probably be multiple reports. The Deep State is pushing the idea that this is Assad’s doing, yet multiple people from within the government and academia, all over the world, are saying no.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) just arrived today at the site to do an inspection.

Related CE Article:  Declassified CIA Report Exposes Over 25 Years of U.S. Plans To Destabilize Syria. 

He stated,

“If there were any sarin present at this location when this photograph was taken everybody in the photograph would have received a lethal or debilitating does of sarin… The fact that these people were dressed so inadequately either suggests a complete ignorance of the basic measures needed to protect an individual from sarin poisoning, or that they knew that the site was not seriously contaminated.” 

It’s great to see prominent academic figures like this stand for truth, instead of keeping quiet for a pay-check.

The funny thing is, it was the CIA Director, Mike Pompeo, confirming that it was the CIA that concluded that the Syrian government was behind these attacks. Or should we simply just say the Deep State, which seems to now have completely taken a hold of Donald Trump‘s administration, as with most presidents before him.

On a personal level I’d like to say that the amount of evidence showing what is really happening with regards to the attacks in Syria is overwhelming. Various good-hearted politicians and academics are laying it out for people bluntly, these are fabricated events created by the western military alliance, the Deep State, in order to justify the infiltration and bombing that is currently taking place in Syria. Is this a take-over agenda, disguised as a rescue mission?

Another key point is the timeline to which both of the recent Syrian chemical attacks took place.

On March 30, 2017, Reuters reported that Syria was no longer a US priority. 5 days after a gas attack takes place in Syria and the US responds with 59 Tomahawk missiles.

Onto to March 29, 2018 and Trump states the US would “be coming out of Syria like very soon,” just hours after the Pentagon highlighted the need for US troops to remain in the country for the immediate future. “We’re knocking the hell out of ISIS. We’ll be coming out of Syria like very soon. Let the other people take care of it now,” Trump told supporters at an Ohio event on infrastructure, as CNN reported.

Just days later on April 7, 2018, the White Helmets report that Assad had gassed his own people  yet again.

Then on April 8, 2018, the US blames Russia, Iran, and Syria for the events.

Russian Hysteria

What’s also interesting to mention is that other world leaders saw this coming after the last supposed chemical weapons attack in Syria that took place last year. Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly stated that this attack was a “false flag” and that “more are being prepared in Syria.”

In a joint press conference with Italian President Sergio Mattarella in Moscow, Putin said,

“We have reports from multiple sources that false flags like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus. They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack.”

Not long ago, at his talk at the 13th annual meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, he expressed how the global community is getting tired of  the powers that be and how they continue to  “churn out threats, imaginary and mythical threats such as the ‘Russian military threat,’” explaining how it’s a “profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defence budgets at home, get allies to bend to a single superpower’s interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.”

He then goes on to describe the anti-Russian propaganda the U.S. has spread in recent years:

“Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed Russian meddling in the American presidential election. The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police.”

You can read that entire transcript and watch the video of his comments here.

No, this isn’t Russian propaganda or fake news, it’s simply information that’s verifiable, it’s up to us as readers and people to look at more than one perspective on something.

The false flag narrative, before a few years ago, was never even brought up by these world ‘leaders.’ Now it seems to be a common term, and so does the Deep State. Truth isn’t truth because a politician says it to be. We can all do our own critical thinking and independent research instead of giving away our perception to the television. If we did this, we would see a different story, and it would be much easier to decipher honest versus dishonest comments that emerge from the mouths of most politicians, but not all.


Here are some related CE Articles regarding the last chemical attack that took place in Syria:

Assad’s Top Political Advisor Says US Missile Strike Killed The People Fighting Terrorists

Assad Says Syria Chemical Attack Was Fabricated & The US Is Hand In Glove With Terrorists

Popular American Journalist, Ben Swann, Explains How There Was No Sarin Gas Attack By Assad In Syria

The Pentagon Is Spending $2.2 Billion To Arm Syrian Rebels & Falsify Paperwork


Why Is All of This So Relevant?

This is because it’s one of many examples of how our perception, our own human consciousness, is being manipulated and used to serve the will of a rogue group of financial elite. Unnecessary human suffering is taking place and we are allowing it by staying unaware and calling for war based on their manipulative tactics. We are thrust into a state of fear in thinking there are so many enemies out to get us all the time and this fear makes us easy to manipulate. When we begin to see the truth, we begin to take back power and suddenly their tactics don’t have the same power as we are seeing today.

It’s also important to reflect that our patriotism towards our country can often be misguided, as we are joining armies and protecting people based on ideas that are not factual.

This type of manipulation of consciousness occurs at all levels, and not just with geopolitical topics.

No longer than five years ago, suggesting that events like these are false flag acts received such harsh criticism, today, it seems more and more people have actually done some independent research and can now see things that are becoming, in the eyes of many, extremely obvious. Thus we are expanding how we see things.

Events like 9/11, and events that’ve been playing out in Syria and all across the Middle East, although seen as dark by some, have actually served a huge purpose for humanity in seeing the truth. As tough as it is to say, without these events transpiring the way they have, we would be much more open to manipulation and deception, but as a result of some of these events, it’s created a counter-reaction of millions of people waking up and seeing through the lies.

Again, there are multiple examples, like Libya. It all seems to be part of the deeper plan.

A shift in consciousness is happening, and what’s encouraging is that it’s not just happening to us, me and you, but it’s also happening with individuals within the Deep State, within the realm of western politics. A great divide is occurring in the deep state and it’s causing many positive changes to this old regime.

This is what’s needed, because at the end of the day, it’s a change within that has to occur within all individuals on this planet if we want to move forward together as one human race. One where our consciousness and perception of reality is our own, and not programmed into us.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Abductions & Car Vandalism – Startling Australian UFO Report Unclassified

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An uncovered Australian report performed by their Department of Defence. “Scientific Intelligence — General — Unidentified Flying Objects” is trending again. Those who have done extensive research on UFOs will find the Australian version of disclosure to be far more intellectually honest than the American version. Albeit it was conducted decades ago.

According to ex-US intelligence official Luis Elizondo, the Defense Department’s Inspector General is presently conducting three reviews. The inquiries vary from the Department of Defense’s handling of UFO claims to Elizondo’s alleged whistleblower retribution. The open IG cases are crucial to Australia’s report because they establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the US Department of Defense is being dishonest and shady when it comes to the UFO subject. For decades, Australia has been a loyal friend of the United States. Within Australia’s boundaries, they share a military installation (Pine Gap). When a close defense ally’s intelligence agencies determined that the US was not being intellectually honest in its approach, perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that there is more to the tale than the 144 incidents studied since 2004 by the UAPTF.

The CIA became alarmed at the overloading of military communications during the mass sightings of 1952 and considered the possibility that the USSR may take advantage of such a situation.

Australian UFO study.

According to the summary, OSI, acting through the Robertson-Panel, encouraged the USAF to use Project Blue Book to publicly “debunk” UFOs. In a tragic twist of fate, when Australian authorities sought explanations from the US Air Force, the allegation was debunked. The authors of the study were depicted as conspiratorial and even crazy by the US Air Force. Ross Coulthart reported this, and it may be heard in a recent Project Unity interview. Courthart is an award-winning investigative journalist who is drawn to forbidden subjects. He also stated on the same podcast that a senior US Navy official identified as Nat Kobitz told him that the US had been in the midst of reverse-engineering numerous non-human craft. According to his obituary, Mr. Kobitz was a former Director of Research and Development at Naval Sea Systems Command.

Continue reading the entire article at The Pulse. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

PGA Tour To End COVID Testing For Both Vaccinated & Non-Vaccinated Players

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The PGA Tour has announced that it will stop testing players every week, regardless of whether they have been vaccinated or not.

  • Reflect On:

    Are PCR tests appropriate to identify infectious people? Should people who are healthy and not sick be tested at all, anywhere?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The picture you see above is of John Rahm, a professional golfer on the PGA tour being carted off the golf course after tournament officials told him he had COVID. He was healthy and had no symptoms, yet was forced to withdraw from the tournament. He was told in front of the camera’s, and a big scene was made out of the event. You would think something like that, especially when you are a big time sports figure, would be done behind closed doors with some privacy.

Earlier on in June a spokesperson for the PGA Tour said that more than 50 percent of players on the PGA tour have been vaccinated. Although it seems that the majority of players on the tour will be fully vaccinated judging by this statement, it does leave a fairly large minority who won’t be, and that’s something we’re seeing across the globe as COVID vaccine hesitancy remains high for multiple reasons.

We are pleased to announce, after consultation with PGA Tour medical advisors, that due to the high rate of vaccination among all constituents on the PGA Tour, as well as other positively trending factors across the country, testing for COVID-19 will no longer be required as a condition of competition beginning with the 3M Open. – PGA tour Senior VP Tyler Dennis

The tour recently announced that the testing of players every week will stop starting in July for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This was an unexpected announcement given the fact that, at least it seems in some countries, vaccinated individuals will enjoy previous rights and freedoms that everyone did before the pandemic. Travelling without need to quarantine and possibly in the future not having to be tested could be a few of those privileges. Others may include attending concerts, sporting events, or perhaps even keeping their job depending on whether or not their employer deems it to be mandatory, if that’s even legally possible. We will see what happens.

Luckily for professional golfers, regardless of their vaccination status they won’t have to worry about testing positive for COVID, especially if they’re not sick. This is the appropriate move by the PGA tour, who is represented by their players and it’s a move that the players themselves may have had a say in. It’s important because PCR tests are not designed nor are they appropriate for identifying infectious people. A number of scientists have been emphasizing this since the beginning of the pandemic. More recently, a letter to the editor published in the Journal of infection explain why more than half of al “positive” PCR tests are likely to have been people who are not infectious, otherwise known as “false positives.”

This is why the Swedish Public Health agency has a notice on their website explaining how and why polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are not useful for determining if someone is infected with COVID or if someone can transmit it to others, and it’s better to use someone who is actually showing symptoms as a judgement call of whether or not they could be infected or free from infection.

PCR tests using a high cycle threshold are extremely sensitive. An article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35, only 3 percent of the samples showed viral replication. This can be interpreted as, if someone tests positive via PCR when a Ct of 35 or higher is used, the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 percent. This begs the question, why has Manitoba, Canada, for example, using cycle thresholds of up to 45 to identify “positive” people?

When it comes to golf, the fact that spread occurring in an outdoor setting is highly unlikely could have been a factor, but it’s also important to mention that asymptomatic spread within one’s own household is also considerably rare. It really makes you wonder what’s going on here, doesn’t it?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

New Study Questions The Safety of COVID Vaccinations & Urges Governments To Take Notice

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 9 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A new study published in the journal Vaccines has called into question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

  • Reflect On:

    Why are people hesitant to take the vaccine? Why are scientists and journalists who explain why hesitancy may exist censored?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A new study published in the journal Vaccines by three scientists and medical professionals from Europe has raised concerns about the safety of COVID vaccines, and it’s not the first to do so. The study found that there is a “lack of clear benefit” of the vaccines and this study should be a catalyst for “governments to rethink their vaccination policy.”

The study calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) in order to prevent one death, and to do so they used a large Israeli Field study. Using the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl), the researchers were able to assess the number of cases reporting severe side effects as well as the cases with fatal side effects as a result of a COVID vaccine.

They point out the following:

The NNTV is between 200-700 to prevent on case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95 % confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

The researchers estimates suggest that we have to exchange 4 fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2-11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations. This puts the risk vs. benefit of COVID vaccination on the same order of magnitude.

We need to accept that around 16 cases will develop severe adverse reactions from COVID-19 vaccines per 100,000 vaccinations delivered, and approximately four people will die from the consequences of being vaccinated per 100,000 vaccinations delivered. Adopting the point estimate of NNTV = 16,000 (95% CI, 9000–50,000) to prevent one COVID-19-related death, for every six (95% CI, 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination, we may incur four deaths as a consequence of or associated with the vaccination. Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.

The study does point out that COVID-19 vaccines are effective and can, according to the publication, prevent infections, morbidity and mortality associated with COVID, but the costs must be weighted. For example, many people have been asking themselves, what are the chances I will get severely ill and die from a COVID infection?

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, from the Stanford University School of Medicine recently shared that the survival rate for people under 70 years of age is about 99.95 percent. He also said that COVID is less dangerous than the flu for children.  This comes based on approximately 50 studies that have been published, and information showing that more children in the U.S. have died from the flu than COVID. Here’s a meta analysis published by the WHO that gives this number. The number comes based on the idea that many more people than we have the capacity to test have most likely been infected.

How dangerous COVID is for healthy individuals has been a controversial discussion throughout this pandemic, with viewpoints differing.

Furthermore, as the study points out, one has to be mindful of a “positive” case determined by a PCR test. A PCR test cannot determine whether someone is infectious or not, and a recent study found that it’s highly likely that at least 50 percent of “positive” cases have been “false positives.”

This is the issue with testing asymptomatic healthy people, especially at a high cycle threshold. It’s the reason why many scientists and doctors have been urging government health authorities to determine cases and freedom from infections based on symptoms rather than a PCR test. You can read more in-depth about PCR testing and the issues with it here if you’re interested.

When it comes to the documented 4 deaths per 100,000 vaccinations and whether or not it’s a significant number, the researchers state,

This is difficult to say, and the answer is dependant on one’s view of how severe the pandemic is and whether the common assumption that there is hardly any innate immunological defense or cross-reactional immunity is true. Some argue that we can assume cross-reactivity of antibodies to conventional coronaviruses in 30–50% of the population [13,14,15,16]. This might explain why children and younger people are rarely afflicted by SARS-CoV2 [17,18,19].

Natural immunity is another interesting topic I’ve written in-depth about. There’s a possibility that more than a billion people have been infected, does this mean they have protection? What happens if previously infected individuals take the vaccine? What does this do to their natural immunity? The research suggesting natural immunity may last decades, or even a lifetime, is quite strong in my opinion.

There are also other health concerns that have been raised that go beyond deaths and adverse reactions as a result of the vaccine.

As the study points out,

A recent experimental study has shown that SARS-CoV2 spike protein is sufficient to produce endothelial damage. [23]. This provides a potential causal rationale for the most serious and most frequent side effects, namely, vascular problems such as thrombotic events. The vector-based COVID-19 vaccines can produce soluble spike proteins, which multiply the potential damage sites [24]. The spike protein also contains domains that may bind to cholinergic receptors, thereby compromising the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways, enhancing inflammatory processes [25]. A recent review listed several other potential side effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that may also emerge later than in the observation periods covered here [26]…Given this fact and the higher number of serious side effects already reported, the current political trend to vaccinate children who are at very low risk of suffering from COVID-19 in the first place must be reconsidered.

Concerns regarding the distribution of the spike protein our cells manufacture after injection have been recently raised by Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph who recently released a detailed in depth report regarding safety concerns about the COVID vaccines.

The report was released to act as a guide for parents when it comes to deciding whether or not their child should be vaccinated against COVID-19. Bridle published the paper on behalf of one hundred other scientists and doctors who part of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, but who are afraid to ‘come out’ publicly and share their concerns. Byram, as many others, have received a lot of criticism and have been subjected to fact checking via Facebook third party fact-checkers.

A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”

It’s also important to note that only a small fraction of side effects are even reported to adverse events databases. The authors cite multiple sources showing this, and that the median underreporting can be as high as 95 percent. This begs the question, how many deaths and adverse reactions from COVID vaccines have not been reported? Furthermore, if there are long term concerns, will deaths resulting from an adverse reaction, perhaps a year later, even be considered as connected to to the vaccine? Probably not.

This isn’t the only study to bring awareness to the lack of injuries most likely not reported. For example, an HHS pilot study conducted by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research found that 1 in every 39 vaccines in the United States caused some type of injury, which is a shocking comparison to the 1 in every million claim. It’s also unsettling that those who are injured by the COVID-19 vaccine won’t be eligible for compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) while COVID is still an “emergency”, at least in the United States.

Below is the most recent data from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Keep in mind that VAERS is not without its criticism. One common criticism we’ve seen from Facebook fact-checkers, for example, is there is no proof that the vaccine was actually the cause of these events.

A few other papers have raised concerns, for example. A study published in October of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice states:

COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”

For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.

There are a plethora of reasons why COVID vaccine hesitancy has been quite high. I wrote an in-depth article about this in April if you’re interested in learning about the other reasons.

Conversations like this are incredibly important in today’s climate of mass censorship. Who is right or wrong is not important, what’s important is that discussion about the vaccine and all other topics remain open and transparent. The amount of experts in the field who have been censored for sharing their views on this topic has been unprecedented. For example, in March, Harvard epidemiologist and vaccine expert Dr. Martin Kulldorff was subjected to censorship by Twitter for sharing his opinion that not everybody needed to take the COVID vaccine.

It’s good to see this recent study point out that the benefits of the vaccine, for some people, may not outweigh the potential costs.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!