Connect with us

Alternative News

500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Many scientists around the world have voiced their concerns regarding Darwin's theory of evolution. The science is not adequate to explain life and human creation.

  • Reflect On:

    Why is this theory pushed so hard? Is this an example of scientific dogma? Some educational institutions are teaching it as fact. Why aren't we taught to question accepted beliefs regarding the origins of human life? Why are there only two options?

It’s amazing how the theory of evolution is pushed on the populace as fact and sound science, but like Professor Colin Reeves, from the Department of Mathematical Sciences from Coventry University explains, “Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century, when handwaving explanations gave a plausible, if not properly scientific, framework into which we could fit biological facts. However, what we have learned science the days of Darwin throws doubt on natural selection’s ability to create complex biological systems – and we still have little more than handwaving as an argument in its favour. “

advertisement - learn more

He is one of 500 scientists in several fields that came together a few years to create “A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.” Here’s another great quote from one of the scientists, Chris Williams, A Ph.D., Biochemistry Ohio State University:

As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact.

Although this seems to be ongoing, and new information has emerged, I’d like to have a discussion about it.

We’re dealing with a controversial topic here, one that has some scientists reprimanded for going against it in some cases. This theory is really being pushed hard on the scientific community, which could be the reason why these scientists chose to voice their concern in such a manner. It’s being taught, in some cases, in schools as fact.

Although the list is an old one, it goes to show that this thought is out there, and this type of thinking is clearly legitimate and exists for several reasons. There are multiple theories out there which we should be discussing, take for example, Francis Crick, a Nobel Prize-winning co-discoverer of the DNA double helix, as Gregg Braden points out, Crick believed that life’s building blocks have to be the result of something more than random mutations a “quirk” of nature…

advertisement - learn more

Crick risked his reputation as a scientist by publicly stating, “An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle.” In the scientific world, this statement is the equivalent of heresy, suggesting that something more than chance evolution led to our existence.

Crick is was one of many scientists who believed that intelligent intervention had something to do with it, and also postulated an extraterrestrial hypothesis.

Gregg Braden makes another great point,

The feeling that there’s something more to our story is not just a recent phenomenon. Archaeological discoveries show that, almost universally, from the ancient Mayan Popol Vuh and the indigenous traditions of the American desert Southwest to the roots of the world’s major religions, ancient humans felt connected to more than just their immediate surroundings. They sensed that we have our roots in other worlds, some that we can’t even see

It wasn’t long ago when Apollo 15 pilot, Alfred Worden stated,

We are the aliens, but we just think they’re somebody else, but we’re the ones who came from somewhere else. Because somebody else had to survive, and they got in a little spacecraft and they came here and they landed and they started civilization here, that’s what I believe. And if you don’t believe me, go get books on the ancient Sumerians and see what they had to say about it, they’ll tell you right up front.

At the end of the day we simply have to ask ourselves, why is it becoming more and more difficult to question things? Many people live in a state of fear and feel worried about how they will be perceived these days for taking a particular view, be it on human evolution, vaccines, whichever…

As a chemist, the most fascinating issue for me revolves around the origin of life. Before life began, there was no biology, only chemistry — and chemistry is the same for all time. What works (or not) today, worked (or not) back in the beginning. So, our ideas about what happened on Earth prior to the emergence of life are eminently testable in the lab. And what we have seen thus far when the reactions are left unguided as they would be in the natural world is not much. Indeed, the decomposition reactions and competing reactions out distance the synthetic reactions by far. It is only when an intelligent agent (such as a scientist or graduate student) intervenes and “tweaks” the reactions conditions “just right” do we see any progress at all, and even then it is still quite limited and very far from where we need to get. Thus, it is the very chemistry that speaks of a need for something more than just time and chance. And whether that be simply a highly specified set of initial conditions (fine-tuning) or some form of continual guidance until life ultimately emerges is still unknown. But what we do know is the random chemical reactions are both woefully insufficient and are often working against the pathways needed to succeed. For these reasons I have serious doubts about whether the current Darwinian paradigm will ever make additional progress in this area.
Edward Peltzer Ph.D. Oceanography, University of California, San Diego (Scripps Institute), Associate Editor, Marine Chemistry

Mainstream education teaches us that 99% of DNA links is indicative of where we came from, but we share approximately 65 percent of our DNA with a Banana, what does that mean?

Human beings aren’t stupid, and this is why in 2014, a Gallup poll revealed that in the United States alone, almost half the population believe that there’s something more to the origins of human existence than the two options that are constantly presented to the masses. They believe that there is something more than Darwin’s theory of evolution.

This tells us that human intuition is pointing us towards something more and some of the greatest scientific minds agree.

It’s also very important to mention the fact that multiple discoveries continue to be left off the record. The discovery of giant skeletons is an excellent example. We have written some heavily sourced articles, displaying a fraction of the evidence that’s out there today, you can access them here.

The point is, there are still many questions left unanswered, and still many discussions to be had.

Free Franco DeNicola Screening: The Shift In Consciousness

We interviewed Franco DeNicola about what is happening with the shift in consciousness. It turned out to be one of the deepest and most important information we pulled out within an interview.

We explored why things are moving a little more slowly with the shift at times, what is stopping certain solutions from coming forward and the important role we all play.

Watch the interview here.
Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

The Purpose of ‘Negative’ Stuff, Conscious Media, Are Mainstream Journalists Bad? – Weekly Q&A

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Each week we do a Q&A based on questions we receive throughout the week. Our goal is to dive DEEPER into content through the questions. This video covers a few questions from Sept 23 - Sept 29, 2018.

  • Reflect On:

    If you have any questions for us, contact us at contact@collective-evolution.com

The second installment of our new initiative to do this weekly Q&A. If you want to check out the first, click here.

We decided to do these weekly public Q&A’s as we have found that people often ask very similar questions (and great questions!) about what’s going on and often times we feel these responses are great for everyone to be hearing as it adds a deeper perspective to what we cover each week. your questions often get us thinking down different paths too, which is awesome and why this community is so damn powerful.

Once again, thanks for taking the time to comment and send us questions via email, Instagram YouTube etc. Your questions are a crucial step in taking this content deeper as a community.

I want to also say, for those wanting to get our weekly behind the scenes updates as well as our daily content sent right to your inbox, click here. We know facebook simply does not work anymore for distributing content, so email is the best way.

Update For Sept 23 – Sept 29, 2018

In the video below I go over everything. Be sure to check out the TIMECODES in the description if you want to skip ahead to other topics. I’m through in how I cover things, I know sometimes people want things faster but I don’t see value in not going deep so this is what it is!

This week’s rundown includes:

advertisement - learn more

00:58 – The Purpose of ‘Negative’ Stuff
15:04 – Conscious Media Movement
17:08 – Are Mainstream Journalists Bad?
26:13 – Getting Back To Our Natural State of Being
32:13 – Email Problems
34:09 – Reader Love

Free Franco DeNicola Screening: The Shift In Consciousness

We interviewed Franco DeNicola about what is happening with the shift in consciousness. It turned out to be one of the deepest and most important information we pulled out within an interview.

We explored why things are moving a little more slowly with the shift at times, what is stopping certain solutions from coming forward and the important role we all play.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading

Alternative News

“QAnon” Answers Questions About The Moon Landings & Extraterrestrials

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    QAnon is still at it, he/she recently stated that we did indeed go to the Moon, but that the official story was not the correct one. Q also made it a point to let readers know about the "vastness" of the universe.

  • Reflect On:

    We don't need Q as a source, most of the topics Q brings up are already backed by evidence. One can do their own research and find multiple 'credible' sources on these topics. There are a list of examples at the end of the article.

The mainstream coverage of the fairly recent “QAnon” issue has been quite embarrassing, it showed a lack of research, a lack of knowledge, and a lack of understanding of how our world really works. A long time ago, Collective Evolution began creating awareness about the “Deep State,” or “Shadow Government,” (those two might also be separate entities) one that’s been spoken of by various people within government for decades. Theodore Roosevelt is one example I like to use, who emphasized that behind the elected government “sits an enthroned and invisible” government. He stated that the task of the real patriot would be to dismantle this secret government. This is why when words like  Deep State started being mentioned in the mainstream media quite often, it caught our attention, and so did this QAnon phenomenon.  The idea of a Deep State is far from a conspiracy theory, there is a ton of evidence in a number of different places to show this.

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states, and nation… The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.  – John F. Hylan, Mayor of New York City from 1918-1925 (source)(source)

This is also seen when you really look at American politics, it’s not a democracy, it’s a corporatocracy that’s controlled by the financial elite. Representatives of this Deep State, according to several global politicians, Vladimir Putin and Bashar Al Assad being the latest, surround the president after the election and let them know all of the dirt they have on them, and what they can and cannot do…It’s not just global politicians, but many Americans and American politicians as well, as detailed about with one example being Hylan. This has also been expressed by several whistleblowers, like the NSA’s William Binney, which brings me to my next point…(if you follow the money, it’s not hard to see).

Politics is simply a tool used by the global elite, who control politicians like puppets. Most of them anyway…

Multiple insiders and people like Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, William Binney, Sibel Edmunds, Thomas Drake and more, have all been explaining for years that there is a huge divide within the US Government, within the NSA, the CIA and the FBI, and that massive amounts of fake news and propaganda are dished out from these areas. There is ‘good’ and then there is the ‘bad,’ which is composed of those who push the agenda of the financial elite, a new world order, one in which a small majority of powerful people, whom clearly control multiple governments, push and impose their ‘political’ and ‘economic’ will on other countries and use false flag terrorism as a means to achieve it. It is my opinion that the war on terrorism is a complete fraud, and a fabrication, similar to the war on drugs.

So, when it comes to QAnon saying there is a ‘Deep State,’ it’s easy for mainstream media to brand this as a conspiracy theory simply because they don’t have any understanding of it. QAnon was and is not needed at all, we can see that there is a Deep State, and we can provide examples in many ways, something which we’ve been doing for years, and many others have as well.

advertisement - learn more

QAnons claims are out there, for example, accusing the global elite of being involved in a massive satanic global pedophile ring. Again, this was also branded as a “conspiracy theory” with no evidence. The funny thing is, we don’t need a QAnon to bring this up as a form of proof, there are countless examples from the Vatican, from within the military industrial complex and within several governments as well within organizations like the United Nations that could all be used as pieces of evidence…It’s enormous and hardly a debatable subject. For more information on that, you can visit the International Tribunal For Natural Justice. Why didn’t mainstream media bring up the NBC news report implicating in covering up a massive pedophile ring within the state department? Anyways, I digress.

‘Conspiracy Theories’ have been confirmed in many different ways, the only ammo the mainstream media has, is simply to ridicule a topic, label it as a conspiracy theory and not even address any of the evidence that’s been brought up.

The people involved in this type of activity have risen to the top of the global power structure, occupying major positions that dictate global policy, which is why it’s so hard to bring accountability to them, especially when they can simply use their mainstream media networks to brand something a “conspiracy theory.”

It’s time to turn off your T.V. and do your own research in order to determine the credibility behind certain claims. We do not need government agencies deciding for us what is ‘fake news’ and what is not ‘fake news.’ It’s time to think for ourselves, and we are, which is why all of this stuff is slowly seeping into the mainstream consciousness….We are becoming aware.

Below is a great explanation from CE Founder Joe Martino, I thought it was important to put it here before we get into what QAnon recently said about the life on other planets.

Related CE Articles On Q:

Reddit Bans QAnon Board: Are They Actually Trying To Accelerate The Great Awakening?

Anonymous White House Staffer’s New York Times Op-Ed: The Deep State Antidote To Q?

So, What Does Q Have To Say About Life On Other Planets? 

Q recently posted about information related to the Moon landing, Roswell, and the Secret Space Program, one that Pentagon hacker Garry Mckinnon brought to light approximately a decade ago when he performed the largest military computer hack in history.

On September 19th, an anonymous user asked Q, “Are we alone? Roswell? And Q responded with, “No. Highest classification. Consider the vastness of space.”

He or she was then asked if we really went to the Moon. The user asked, “Did NASA fake the Moon landings? Have we been to the Moon since then? Are there secret space programs? Is this why the Space Force was created? ‘Q’ answered, “False, Moon landings are real. Programs exist that are outside of the public domain.”

Again, this is yet another example of where we don’t really need a ‘Q’ for us to really get to the bottom of the fact that something is going on. The UFO phenomenon is now verified within the mainstream, I recently published an article about the latest updates with regards to mainstream UFO disclosure:

The US Government Just Admitted To Recovering Materials from UFOs – Here Are The Latest Updates

We have statements from high-ranking people from within governments, military, intelligence agencies, academia and more to compliment the electrooptical data, radar trackings, physical evidence etc…

The statement below from Victor Marchetti, former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, doesn’t seem to hold so true anymore, at least the last part.

“We have, indeed, been contacted — perhaps even visited — by extraterrestrial beings, and the US government, in collusion with the other national powers of the Earth, is determined to keep this information from the general public.”
(Second Look, Volume 1, No 7, Washington, DC, May, 1979)

As far as the Moon goes, Q’s comments are interesting, because I share the same sentiment after all of my research into the topic, something I’ve been doing for more than a decade. You can see why I feel the way I do, and all of the evidence available that has me, and others like Q, thinking that way. The only difference is, perhaps Q is privy to insider knowledge, perhaps not, but that’s not the point here. The source of this information should not be put on Q, it should instead simply point to the evidence which already exists.

The Deputy Manager for the Clementine Mission to The Moon told the world that it was really a photo reconnaissance mission to investigate artificial structures that have been built on the back side of the Moon by, who knows?  A study was recently published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration examining strange, what appears to be, artificial structures on the back side of the Moon. All these points and several more are sourced and discussed within the articles below, enjoy!

Evidence Suggests The Moon Isn’t What We Think – Someone Might Have Put It There

Did Neil Armstrong & His Crew Encounter Extraterrestrials On The Moon?

A Well Known CIA Pilot Claims That The Moon Has 250 Million Citizens

Dr. Steven Greer: “We Did Go To The Moon, But The Footage Was Fake

The United States Tried To Detonate A Nuclear Weapon on The Moon – Somebody Responded When We Did

A CE Podcast About The Face on Mars & Strange Structures on The Moon – What’s Going On Up There? 

New Study: “Unusual Structures” On The Far Side of the Moon Could Have Been Made By Extraterrestrials

Free Franco DeNicola Screening: The Shift In Consciousness

We interviewed Franco DeNicola about what is happening with the shift in consciousness. It turned out to be one of the deepest and most important information we pulled out within an interview.

We explored why things are moving a little more slowly with the shift at times, what is stopping certain solutions from coming forward and the important role we all play.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading

Alternative News

Natural Law Part 5: This Man Is Claiming His Scotland District As Sovereign Territory

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Stuart Hill, a resident of Shetland, has long fought for the independence of Shetland and his self-claimed state, Forvik Island, as his way of bringing attention to the natural rights and freedoms of citizens that have been hidden from us.

  • Reflect On:

    Can Stuart Hill's fight help to inspire our own awakening to our true sovereignty as individuals that fosters its gradual implementation into our societies?

Stuart Hill is a resident of Shetland, ‘Scotland.’ Scotland is in quotation marks here because Hill believes that Shetland is not, and never was, a part of Scotland. Nor does he think it is part of the UK, or the European Union, for that matter.

His argument? There is absolutely no proof that Shetland ever became a part of Scotland. And he has done the historical research that backs this up,

“The only powers granted to King James III of Scotland in 1469, when he accepted these islands as security in the matter of payment of a marriage dowry, were those of trustee. His Majesty was holding them in trust until they were redeemed by King Christian of Denmark and Norway or his successors. The Plenipotentiaries of Europe confirmed in the 1667 Peace and Treaty of Breda that these arrangements remained in full force at that time and nothing has happened since then to give the monarch any further rights or powers.”

Note that Hill does not treat this as simply a research project. He has tangled with law enforcement and the courts on more than one occasion–and has served time — as a result of his stance of not recognizing the jurisdiction of Scottish courts on residents of Shetland in the first place. Like many pioneers who delve into the murky waters of the judicial system from a place of truth and integrity about our Natural Rights and Freedoms, he has been met with puzzlement and confusion in some cases, and arrogance and ridicule in others. He has experienced first-hand the resistance of people of authority ‘within’ the system who do not react very kindly to challenges to the grounds of their authority as such.

 Claiming The Island Of Forvik

Having actually and metaphorically gotten shipwrecked onto Shetland some 17 years ago after trying to circumnavigate the UK in a boat he made himself (a story in itself described in this article), it seemed like the universe meant him to relocate to this remote northern district, to try to flesh out and realize his beliefs about the individual sovereignty of human beings and the corruption and falsity of the current political and economic order.

This public notice on his website bears witness to his unilateral declaration of the independence of Shetland:

advertisement - learn more

PUBLIC NOTICE
To all persons exercising the alleged authority of
Scotland, The United Kingdom or The European Union in Shetland or Orkney:

You are hereby notified that The Crown produced no proof that Shetland is part of Scotland when required to do so at Lerwick Sheriff Court on 16 August 2011. Since that time courts at every level in the Scottish System, including the Supreme Court in London, have evaded the question when challenged. All proceedings in those courts in relation to Shetland are therefore null and void.
You are hereby notified that the court continued to exercise its alleged authority with no proof of its jurisdiction.
With this knowledge you are hereby advised that, in exercising your alleged authority, you expose yourself to the risk of personal liability against which your bond or insurance, will be worthless.
This Public Notice will be founded upon in the event of any action.

In the context of Shetland and the residents upon it being their own authority, Hill has laid claim in particular to the independence of Forvik, a small island within the district of Shetland, which Hill is the self-appointed authority of, and upon which he has maintained occasional (and sole) residence.

Forvik Island

One could hardly argue that Hill has declared himself King of this small territory for any personal gain or benefit. This article gives important insights into why waging political and legal battles and risking going to jail has a larger purpose for Hill, one that will resonate with the Awakening Community:

He says his goal is to establish an alternative administration in Shetland, and what he calls a ‘fairer society’ than the one he left behind the in UK. He says he’s become disillusioned, as many have, with the obfuscation of 21st century democracy by ‘politicians, lawyers, pointless middlemen, basically’. There has to be a better way, he says.

Since declaring independence for Forvik in 2008, Hill has sold more than 200 ‘citizenships’ on his island, with full members entitled to participate in the island’s ‘direct democracy’ system, a sort-of internet polling system to decide consensus on key issues. What key issues an island with a land mass totaling around 2.5 acres, and with only one occasional resident, faces is unclear. But it’s the principle which Hill is trying to establish.

“Forvik is a microcosm, basically, operating under a direct democracy system that gives power to the people, not politicians. It’s my hope that Forvik will provide an example for Shetland to follow and that Shetland in turn will provide an example for other countries and regions, the people of which would prefer a system where their politicians represent, rather than rule them.”

“If the electorate is empowered to instruct officials directly, do we have any need for politicians and all that goes with them? No politicians, no MP’s expenses, no illegal wars, no lobbying, no control by big business and bankers.”

A Harbinger

Stuart Hill is one of those rare people who has come ready to fight for truth and principles despite the enormous weight of opposition, not only from the duplicitous rulers of the status quo but also from fellow citizens who do not yet have the vision and understanding to see our Natural Rights out in front of us ready to be grasped and held on to.

In this way he is a harbinger, one of the strong rays of light that helps to bring what has long been hidden into view. The Awakening Community must applaud the efforts of people like Stuart Hill, because they not only help us to realize ourselves as fully sovereign, but they pave the way for our work of transforming our societies in ways that reflect this sovereignty.

Free Franco DeNicola Screening: The Shift In Consciousness

We interviewed Franco DeNicola about what is happening with the shift in consciousness. It turned out to be one of the deepest and most important information we pulled out within an interview.

We explored why things are moving a little more slowly with the shift at times, what is stopping certain solutions from coming forward and the important role we all play.

Watch the interview here.
Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

EL