Connect with us

News

3 Reasons Why Kavanaugh Should Not Serve On Supreme Court

Avatar

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh has supported the Patriot Act, has expanded the definition of who could be tortured and appears to support mass government spying on citizens.

  • Reflect On:

    Do we view people, political situations and world events in extreme ways too often? Are our black and white views causing us to miss the truth and not see the big picture? Is it time to take a step back and see what's truly going on?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

In some areas of the alternative media world, it is believed that Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination for Supreme Court is a move that will destabilize more of the cabal/deep state. His confirmation would supposedly bring a key ally to the Supreme Court who would be able to work alongside Trump in their alleged efforts to shut down the cabal.

advertisement - learn more

I have been researching this subject since Trump’s initial rise to president. It began with an intuitive feeling that something was changing within the deep state when Trump got into ‘power.’ I have stated on many occasions that I do believe he is working, in some ways, to destabilize certain aspects of the deep state and that people like the Clinton’s are deeply fearful of this individual due to their inability to control him. More on those details in the link above.

--> Our Journalism Is Moving - Our investigative journalism and reporting is moving to our new brand called The Pulse. Click here to stay informed.

I do understand that Q has released info regarding Kavanaugh being framed and that it is an attempt to block work being done to affect the cabal and deep state negatively. I also do believe there is legitimacy to the Q phenomenon being made up of a group of intelligence insiders. I discuss this in detail in a recent video I released. Is there light to be seen in this? We shall see as we go. If Q is in fact as legit as many, including myself, feel it is, Kavanaugh may be an ally in this space.

However, I still feel the need to discuss an important nuance in this article. A nuance that will seem paradoxical, that will seem like maybe things are unclear about whether or not there should be support for Trump or Kavanaugh or… anyone for that matter.

I have come across some interesting thoughts about Kavanaugh brought forth by other journalists that I feel help to ground this situation a bit, and sober the ‘messiah complex’ that many are bringing to the table when it comes to Trump and even Kavanaugh. Most importantly, I intend to bring an understanding that these situations are not as black and white as we sometimes like to make them, and that if we take the time to remain neutral in our observation, we will not run into issues down the road where we begin to become blind to what’s truly playing out.

With that, I invite you to please read carefully and pay attention to the sentiments I’m touching on.

advertisement - learn more

Kavanaugh Supports The Patriot Act

The aftermath of 9/11, the biggest false flag attack in US history, gave birth to a new policy that was essential to creating the national security state we live in currently. This of course was permitted by the extreme fear the public operated from after 9/11, the media intensity that followed and the wild story that was made up by the 9/11 commission.

According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which filed a Freedom of Information Act Request for Kavanaugh’s official government correspondence records, Kavanaugh has referred to the Patriot Act as a “measured, careful, responsible, and constitutional approach” in an email he sent to a colleague.

He has even stated, “…the new law will update laws authorizing government surveillance.”

Do we want to support individuals that see value in such a publicly harmful policy? In 2018 does he still truly support things like this? Questions we have to consider.

He Appears To Have Lied About & Supported ‘The Torture Memos’

There have been a number of sobering moments for people as they have realized the true nature of America’s involvement in wars they fund and create, and how their military action has been outright torture and genocide on a number of occasions. These are moments where humanity has the opportunity to truly observe the ‘darkness’ we are capable of creating when we allow our unconsciousness to give up power to ‘leaders’ who don’t truly reflect a world we would all like to live in.

The world learned about the Bush Administration’s attempt to broadly expand the legal definition of torture so they could justify acts like waterboarding and sleep deprivation as permissible when questioning combatants. This was part of the sobering experience that many Americans went through as they realized America was not the moral and ethical global force they had thought it was.

Judge Kavanaugh served on Bush’s Administration at that time and in 2006 was questioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee on the issue of these memos that discussed the expanding of these definitions. This new expansion would also allow the US government to take these actions on anyone they deemed an enemy. Anyone. Kavanaugh went on record to say that he knew nothing of the Torture Memos before their public release.

He told Senator Leahy:

“I think with respect to the legal justifications or the policies relating to the treatment of detainees, I was not aware of any issues on that or the legal memos that subsequently came out. This was not part of my docket, either in the counsel’s office or as staff secretary.”

Many people have been skeptical about his lack of knowledge due to the fact that his position at the time required that memos and other written correspondences had to pass by his desk at some point before reaching their final recipient.

He Doesn’t Believe In Privacy

Those who know and are passionate about the Snowden story are well aware of the mass amounts of public data collection the NSA had been participating in and lying to the public about.

Kavanaugh has sided with mass government surveillance stating that “the government’s metadata collection program is entirely consistent with the fourth amendment.” He has also stated that “critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this program.”

This is a classic justification used on the public for why seemingly extreme acts or policies are created and upheld. If it threatens ‘national security’ then we just should stay quiet and say nothing as patriotic public citizens. Unfortunately, this justification is used for every major issue the public raises questions about.

The Takeaway

To me, this is about taking a step back and questioning whether or not we should be jumping so heavily into extreme views about anything or anyone. On the left or Democratic side, many are up in arms about what Kavanaugh allegedly did with Dr. Ford, even though there is no evidence of it at this point. On the flip side, people are giving unflinching support to this man because they are Republican and support Trump.

Furthermore, some of the alternative media community sees Trump and Kavanaugh as some sort of messianic duo coming to save the world. While there may be some truth to this, this unquestioned faith is blinding people from the truth and the bigger picture.

In all cases, we have to take a step back from politics and truly ask what the heck we are supporting here. Why do we identify so deeply with political sides and thus blind ourselves from any truth by remaining extreme? Does our division into political sides truly help our cause to create a better world as a collective? There’s more reflection on this in a recent Q&A I did.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Abductions & Car Vandalism – Startling Australian UFO Report Unclassified

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An uncovered Australian report performed by their Department of Defence. “Scientific Intelligence — General — Unidentified Flying Objects” is trending again. Those who have done extensive research on UFOs will find the Australian version of disclosure to be far more intellectually honest than the American version. Albeit it was conducted decades ago.

According to ex-US intelligence official Luis Elizondo, the Defense Department’s Inspector General is presently conducting three reviews. The inquiries vary from the Department of Defense’s handling of UFO claims to Elizondo’s alleged whistleblower retribution. The open IG cases are crucial to Australia’s report because they establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the US Department of Defense is being dishonest and shady when it comes to the UFO subject. For decades, Australia has been a loyal friend of the United States. Within Australia’s boundaries, they share a military installation (Pine Gap). When a close defense ally’s intelligence agencies determined that the US was not being intellectually honest in its approach, perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that there is more to the tale than the 144 incidents studied since 2004 by the UAPTF.

The CIA became alarmed at the overloading of military communications during the mass sightings of 1952 and considered the possibility that the USSR may take advantage of such a situation.

Australian UFO study.

According to the summary, OSI, acting through the Robertson-Panel, encouraged the USAF to use Project Blue Book to publicly “debunk” UFOs. In a tragic twist of fate, when Australian authorities sought explanations from the US Air Force, the allegation was debunked. The authors of the study were depicted as conspiratorial and even crazy by the US Air Force. Ross Coulthart reported this, and it may be heard in a recent Project Unity interview. Courthart is an award-winning investigative journalist who is drawn to forbidden subjects. He also stated on the same podcast that a senior US Navy official identified as Nat Kobitz told him that the US had been in the midst of reverse-engineering numerous non-human craft. According to his obituary, Mr. Kobitz was a former Director of Research and Development at Naval Sea Systems Command.

Continue reading the entire article at The Pulse. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

Exopolitics

New UFO Film Questions What The US Government Is Hiding

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The US recently released its highly anticipated Pentagon UAP report, but it wasn’t much more than a 9 page rundown of what has been known for decades. Regardless, for many, what was promising was that the UFO subject was being taken seriously again – and perhaps many more scientists might get involved.

For decades many have been warning about leaving UFO disclosure in the hands of a government that likes to use crisis’ or current events to expand its defense budgets. Further, why would we suddenly expect a government, who has been lying about this subject for 70 years, to suddenly come forth with the truth? What would inspire them to suddenly change their mind?

Perhaps it’s because the search for ET is an idea who’s time has truly come. We’ve reporting on this for over 13 years, and are mongst a community of researchers who have been encouraging humanity to look at the evidence for more than 70 years. It feels like an idea that human collective consciousness is more than ready to explore.

The impact the ET question has on our individual and collective worldview has the power to truly change the way we view ourselves and the meaning of life here on earth. Think of the implications answers to this question could have on how we set up and run our society as well. Technology, culture, collaboration etc – I spoke about this more in great detail in my extended interview for Greer’s. prior film Close Encounters of The Fifth Kind here.

Now, a new documentary from Dr. Steven Greer, directed by my good friend Michael Mazzola, seeks to explore what the films calls “the current government and media disinformation campaign promoting 3 big lies:”

1. We do not know what these UAPs/ UFOs are. WE DO.
2. Humans cannot make craft that can maneuver like UFOs. WE CAN and WE DO.
3. The UFOs are a threat. THEY ARE NOT.

Bold statements. Watch the film below and see what resonates most with you.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

PGA Tour To End COVID Testing For Both Vaccinated & Non-Vaccinated Players

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The PGA Tour has announced that it will stop testing players every week, regardless of whether they have been vaccinated or not.

  • Reflect On:

    Are PCR tests appropriate to identify infectious people? Should people who are healthy and not sick be tested at all, anywhere?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The picture you see above is of John Rahm, a professional golfer on the PGA tour being carted off the golf course after tournament officials told him he had COVID. He was healthy and had no symptoms, yet was forced to withdraw from the tournament. He was told in front of the camera’s, and a big scene was made out of the event. You would think something like that, especially when you are a big time sports figure, would be done behind closed doors with some privacy.

Earlier on in June a spokesperson for the PGA Tour said that more than 50 percent of players on the PGA tour have been vaccinated. Although it seems that the majority of players on the tour will be fully vaccinated judging by this statement, it does leave a fairly large minority who won’t be, and that’s something we’re seeing across the globe as COVID vaccine hesitancy remains high for multiple reasons.

We are pleased to announce, after consultation with PGA Tour medical advisors, that due to the high rate of vaccination among all constituents on the PGA Tour, as well as other positively trending factors across the country, testing for COVID-19 will no longer be required as a condition of competition beginning with the 3M Open. – PGA tour Senior VP Tyler Dennis

The tour recently announced that the testing of players every week will stop starting in July for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This was an unexpected announcement given the fact that, at least it seems in some countries, vaccinated individuals will enjoy previous rights and freedoms that everyone did before the pandemic. Travelling without need to quarantine and possibly in the future not having to be tested could be a few of those privileges. Others may include attending concerts, sporting events, or perhaps even keeping their job depending on whether or not their employer deems it to be mandatory, if that’s even legally possible. We will see what happens.

Luckily for professional golfers, regardless of their vaccination status they won’t have to worry about testing positive for COVID, especially if they’re not sick. This is the appropriate move by the PGA tour, who is represented by their players and it’s a move that the players themselves may have had a say in. It’s important because PCR tests are not designed nor are they appropriate for identifying infectious people. A number of scientists have been emphasizing this since the beginning of the pandemic. More recently, a letter to the editor published in the Journal of infection explain why more than half of al “positive” PCR tests are likely to have been people who are not infectious, otherwise known as “false positives.”

This is why the Swedish Public Health agency has a notice on their website explaining how and why polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are not useful for determining if someone is infected with COVID or if someone can transmit it to others, and it’s better to use someone who is actually showing symptoms as a judgement call of whether or not they could be infected or free from infection.

PCR tests using a high cycle threshold are extremely sensitive. An article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35, only 3 percent of the samples showed viral replication. This can be interpreted as, if someone tests positive via PCR when a Ct of 35 or higher is used, the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 percent. This begs the question, why has Manitoba, Canada, for example, using cycle thresholds of up to 45 to identify “positive” people?

When it comes to golf, the fact that spread occurring in an outdoor setting is highly unlikely could have been a factor, but it’s also important to mention that asymptomatic spread within one’s own household is also considerably rare. It really makes you wonder what’s going on here, doesn’t it?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Join us on Telegram

We post important content to Telegram daily so we don't have to rely on Facebook.

You have Successfully Subscribed!