- The Facts:
Celine Dion teams up with Nununu to create a clothing line called Celinununu that produces gender neutral clothing for children.
- Reflect On:
Does this clothing line feel creepy to you? Whether it be the call for a 'New Order' or even the looks of the children in the images? Are we truly even our physical identity and appearance? Should we not be exploring the deeper parts of ourselves?
I was perusing through my Facebook newsfeed and came across what I initially thought was pretty crazy. Images of kids wearing odd-looking clothing with occult symbols and the words ‘NEW ORDER’ written across the chest. I thought it was some joke someone had put together to play on how there has been a long-standing goal of the elite/cabal to create a ‘new world order’ and what better way to start than babies and kids.
It all is shown in a new commercial where Celine Dion is breaking into a hospital baby ward to help bring her new clothing line to babies. The company Celinununu states in its mission: CELINUNUNU unites two forces by one voice: fashion has the power to shape people’s minds. Inspire your children to be free and find their own individuality through clothes.
The commercial for the product line is interesting on its own. She plays the ‘saviour’ of these babies, against police who are trying to stop her from telling these babies it’s OK to not select a gender. After she sneaks in, gets to the baby ward, she blows a magical dust onto the children, suddenly turning them all into gender-neutral babies wearing her clothing line. In cabal/occult terms, one might look at this as casting a spell on the children, something that fits deeply into the constant confusion the cabal is trying to cast on humanity.
One of the long-discussed plans of the elite/cabal has been to create a New World Order. Part of that order involves bringing everyone under one religion, one government, one military, and stopping things like procreation etc so as to have to control fewer people. This is why it’s so odd that the focus of this clothing line seems to push towards ‘New Order’ while talking about a highly controversial issue. Have a look at the images below for a deeper look into this line.
Here is the commercial.
Could This Be Something Else?
Another way to look at some of what is being said here is to look at the words “inspire your children to be free and find their own individuality through clothes.”
While this is an interesting concept, are we not telling them that their individuality is to identify as gender neutral? Or to wear these clothes so you don’t fall into one box or another? Does this not defeat the purpose of allowing a child to choose? I’ve always brought this up because it reminds me of people who follow a trend like wearing Uggz and then saying ‘I’m expressing my individuality through fashion” yet they are wearing the trendiest boot on the market. Is that individuality? Or capitalizing on a trend?
Then we can look at the occult aspect of this whole thing and the tie to the New World Order. Maybe they do stuff like this on purpose. Choose branding and designs that are so obviously occult that it will get people talking about it. Free publicity! She could later change the designs to something a lot less cabal/occult-ish, but then again, for the cabal, exposing their religion on the masses, and making it cool and acceptable has been their belief and goal all along. So it actually makes much more sense that they would be doing it in this fashion.
Using people in the industry they create and control to push their religion is not a new idea either. Below is an image of just a few examples. You can even see Celine Dion in the bottom right corner. Again, you have to look at this in the exact same way Christians wear crucifixes. This isn’t about some outlandish conspiracy, this is about a religion to them, and symbolism is very important to their beliefs. Many inside whistleblowers have corroborated this fact.
Discussion On Gender
Firstly, I do feel that man or woman, you are not defined by your sex or gender identity, and therefore I feel you should not have to be or do certain things simply because society has always stated that’s how men or women should be. Do women have to wear makeup every day? Do men have to do labor jobs? Do women have to play with Barbies while men play with GI Joe’s? No. If people allow themselves to pay attention to who they truly are, we will do what we feel most guided to do outside of expectation and so forth. But we also must be open as a society to not assume it’s bad to give a boy a GI Joe and a girl a Barbie.
People are doing what is classic in the modern human condition: we’re acting from extremes. When we view one side of the polarity, we tend to push to the other side and call it neutrality. A human is either male or female from a physical perspective, sure sometimes people have both parts and those are different cases. Beyond that, I understand people can sometimes feel that they are in the ‘wrong’ body per se, I personally do not know all of the reasons why this might be the case. I do feel it’s possible some people legitimately feel that way naturally, but I also feel many people who feel that way do for psychological reasons, in the same way many of us struggle with psychological challenges. It’s simply about how it shows up.
Before anyone loses it over that statement, I repeat, “I personally do not know all of the reasons why this might be the case. I do think it’s possible some people legitimately feel that way naturally.”
I feel that when looking at children, why is it OK to push schooling, religion and those sorts of ideas down their throats, yet we’re worried about buying someone the wrong toy or piece of clothing because it may harm their identity and individuality? Are we even our physical identity? You have the freedom to do whatever you wish. The problem is, people are confused, so they are trying to work through that confusion by blaming everyone else for why they are confused. Hence you have people getting upset about what pronoun a stranger addresses them by.
Does a child know how they want to dress and be when they are young? Whether they want to change their sex from a man to a woman or vice versa? What age do they figure that out? How much of the time is this a result of parents unconsciously forcing their new beliefs on their children?
In classic modern human consciousness, we are looking at all the things we are not, and trying to find ourselves. Our individuality comes from knowing ourselves beyond our mind and ego, and instead recognizes the unique energy, gifts, and intentions we come here to express. In my view, knowing that would produce a much healthier society versus one where we’re focused entirely on material and physical means. That isn’t who we are.
I do feel that in many of the extremes we are seeing today, we recognize where we operate from on a regular basis, and this allows us to see ourselves VERY clearly. By seeing so heavily how we identify with the physical, we can ask questions about what we are beyond the physical. This will allow us to dive more deeply in exploring who we truly are and ultimately this will pull immense power away from material and physical identifications and will instead awaken ourselves to an infinite love and confidence that already exists within ourselves.
While it’s easy to simply say this is all crazy stuff leading towards the end of society as we know it, it can also be a giant mirror that shows us what we are not. The next step is simply letting go of those old ideas.
Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested By FBI on Charges Connected To Jeffrey Epstein
What Happened: Jeffrey Epstein’s confidant Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested this morning in New Hampshire according to FBI spokeswoman Adrienne Senatore. At this time, charges against Maxwell are sealed, and prosecutors have scheduled a midday press conference in New York to provide more details on the case.
Charges against Maxwell came almost a year after Epstein was arrested by FBI agents on July 6, 2019. Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself in a federal jail in August 2019, although many believe he was killed given he could name many high profile figures connected to his ring.
Why It Matters: Maxwell is heavily connected to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein who operated a sex/pedophile ring that tailored to high profile individuals, business people, entertainers and politicians.
Her arrest may be important in helping to bring down more people connected to the ring which include Hillary and Bill Clinton amongst other high profile names.
Humanity is in a process of ‘Breaking the Illusion’ we have come to accept about our reality. We have been living from a collective story that states we elect good people into government, and they act on our best interest. This categorically is not the case, and part of our collective awakening to creating solutions that can make our world thrive is waking up from this illusion we have chosen to accept.
People are beginning to learn en masse that high profile figures are involved in such acts like extreme occult rituals, sex trafficking and pedophilia, and they are beginning to wonder why. They are also beginning to question why we put our trust and support in people who operate in this manner.
We have interviewed a survivor of elite pedophile rings like the one Epstein and Maxwell ran. Her name is Anneke Lucas and you can watch her full testimony here on CETV.
You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well.
Read more about Epstein ad Maxwell here.
Environmentalist Censored For Shifting His Opinion On Climate Change
- The Facts:
Forbes.com deleted a new article from environmentalist Michael Shellenberger. His perspective on climate change shifted, and he decided to write about it. Forbes wasn't having it.
- Reflect On:
Why are we deciding to censor different perspectives as opposed to explore them? Is our emotional intelligence so undeveloped collectively that we cannot have civil conversations?
What Happened: Michael Shellenberger, a long time environmentalist who has been in the trenches helping to save the world’s last unprotected redwoods, co-created the predecessor to today’s Green New Deal and led an effort to keep nuclear power plants operating in order to prevent a spike of emissions, has shifted his perspective on climate change. Prior to today, he was holding the perspective that we must be alarmed about the fact that the world will end in a short amount of time if we don’t act to reduce carbon emissions immediately.
He shifted his opinion based on exploring emerging science on the subject. He then went on to write a book called Never Apocalypse, which seeks to help explore what we can do to better our environment from a grounded and accurate point of view, as opposed to alarmism.
He wrote an article on Forbes website titled “On Behalf of Environmentalists, I Apologize For the Climate Scare.” Two days later, Forbes decided to remove his article.
Why It Matters: The fact that Forbes removed an article that was grounded, calm, well written and explored new conversations illustrates the emerging culture of ‘censor anything that can get us in trouble’ or ‘censor anything that doesn’t agree with mainstream conjecture.”
We’ve come into a time where our collective lack of emotional intelligence is surfacing deeply for us to address. When we disagree on something, we struggle to explore things together. When a company says something they feel might get them in trouble, they run away in fear that the angry mob will come after them.
All that happened here was a man wrote an article that brought some new light to a conversation that has been very polarized and is causing people to react out of emotion instead of logic and the heart. Instead of listening and exploring, censorship ensues.
The Takeaway: I spoke at a high school here in Toronto last year. At the end of my talk, many students came up to me to talk, discuss ideas and share feedback. The vast majority of them explained to me that they were terrified that the world was going to end in just a few years. They felt they had no future because of the acts of generations prior who were causing CO2 levels to rise so high that the world would end.
I thought to myself, wow, an entire generation of kids being pushed into fear, anxiety and depression based on information that isn’t even accurate. This information was created by politicians and pushed out by media. Scientists categorically do not agree with the idea that the world is coming to an end as a result of CO2 emissions. Yet not enough people are telling people this, most of media is staying silent on other perspectives and censorship even shuts down opposing ideas.
What type of world will we create if we can’t discuss basic ideas? What type of world will we create when we choose to run, hide and censor as opposed to having important conversations? How can we stop identifying so deeply with positions, so that we can be more free to shift ideas when new information helps us understand things better?
I made a film last year called Regenerate: Beyond The CO2 Narrative. After 10 years of researching and investigating climate change, I came to many conclusions that I felt needed to be shared, yet were extremely rare in public discourse. One of the most important aspects of Regenerate was that we simply are looking at our environment from such a limited point of view that we can’t identify the real issues we face, and that our level of thinking, or consciousness, is completely disconnected from the solutions required to truly shift our relationship with earth. Thus, we are creating solutions that never truly address making the environment cleaner or better long term.
I encourage you to check out the film trailer below, and if you wish to watch the film, it’s available on our member platform called CETV. You can start a free 7 day trial to watch it if you like. We also discuss this story in more detail in episode 2 of The Takeway, an orignal show we have on CETV.
Soft Drink Companies Caught Using Big Tobacco’s Playbook To Lure Young Children
- The Facts:
Documents obtained by researchers clearly outline the unethical and immoral actions Tobacco companies used to 'hook' kids onto sugary drinks. They use the same tactics they did for smoking.
- Reflect On:
Why do and have our federal health regulatory agencies allow such products to be approved as safe for consumption when they are clearly linked to a variety of diseases, like cancer?
Many moves made by multiple big corporations are extremely unethical, immoral, and downright shocking. These corporations have completely compromised our federal health regulatory agencies, and it’s quite clear that they do not care about the health of the human race and will do anything when it comes to the success of the products they manufacture, including taking illegal and/or immoral actions.
One of the more recent examples comes from the tobacco industry. Companies within the industry used colors, flavors, and marketing techniques to lure and entice children as potential future smokers. They actually used and applied these same strategies to sweetened beverages starting as early as 1963, according to a study conducted by researchers at UC San Francisco.
As the Sugar Scientists point out:
The study, which draws from a cache of previously secret documents from the tobacco industry that is part of the UCSF Industry Documents Library tracked the acquisition and subsequent marketing campaigns of sweetened drink brands by two leading tobacco companies: R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris. It found that as tobacco was facing increased scrutiny from health authorities, its executives transferred the same products and tactics to peddle soft drinks. The study was published in the March 2019 issue of BMJ.
“Executives in the two largest U.S.-based tobacco companies had developed colors and flavors as additives for cigarettes and used them to build major children’s beverage product lines, including Hawaiian Punch, Kool-Aid, Tang and Capri Sun,” said senior author Laura Schmidt, PhD, MSW, MPH, of the UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Even after the tobacco companies sold these brands to food and beverage corporations, many of the product lines and marketing techniques designed to attract kids are still in use today.” (source)
The new papers, which are available in the UCSF Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library, a subset of the UCSF Industry Documents Library, reveal the close and tight knit relationships between the big tobacco and big food industries. In fact, in the 60s and 70s, these companies conducted taste tests with mothers and their children to evaluate sweetness, colors and flavors for Hawaiian Punch product line extensions. The children’s preferences were prioritized.
Kool-Aid Joins Marlboro
Meanwhile, tobacco competitor Philip Morris had acquired Kool-Aid, via General Foods, in 1985. The company flipped its marketing audience from families to children, created its “Kool-Aid Man” mascot, and launched collaborations with branded toys, including Barbie and Hot Wheels. It also developed a children’s Kool-Aid loyalty program described as “our version of the Marlboro Country Store,” a cigarette incentives program. (source)
“The Wacky Wild Kool-Aid style campaign had tremendous reach and impact,” said first author Kim Nguyen, ScD, MPH, who is also with the UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Lots of kids in the ’80s dreamed of getting swag from the Wacky Warehouse. What is really ‘wacky’ is that the Kool-Aid kid program was modeled after a tobacco marketing strategy designed to build allegiance with smokers.”
The tobacco giant also acquired Capri Sun and Tang, and used similar child-focused integrated marketing strategies to drive those sales.
“The industry claims that these tobacco-inspired marketing strategies are not actually targeting children and should be excluded from these industry-led agreements,” said Schmidt. “But the evidence cited in our research shows that these product lines and marketing techniques were specifically designed for and tested on children.” (source)
The UCSF Industry Documents Library was launched in 2002 as a digital portal for tobacco documents. Today, the library includes close to 15 million internal tobacco, drug, chemical and food industry documents used by scientists, policymakers, journalists and community members in their efforts to improve and protect the health of the public.
At the end of the day, it’s important to recognize that government health authorities and the corporations we buy our food from, among other things, really don’t care about us. This has become extremely evident, as they are responsible for the sharp rise in numerous diseases. It’s not uncommon to see parents buy their children products similar to the ones listed above, and that’s due to mass brainwashing and the fact that we’ve been made to feel that these products are actually safe. This is why awareness is so critical.
Have You Been Seeing Crows? What The Crow Symbolizes (More Than Just Death)
The other morning I ran out to my car to grab my purse when I heard the loudest “CAW” from...
“The Level of Stupidity Going On Here Is Amazing” – Nobel Laureate For Science On Covid-19 Lockdown
As many of you reading this may already be aware, a number of prominent scientists around the world have been...