- The Facts:
In speaking engagements through Europe, the Dalai Lama has repeatedly said that the refugees that have flooded European countries over the past few years should have plans to eventually go back to their homeland.
- Reflect On:
Can we step back and provide ourselves a greater context for the Dalai Lama's opinion, so that we can appreciate a bit of the nuance inherent in the matter he is addressing?
We live in interesting times. With an unprecedented amount of information now readily accessible on portable electronic devices, and the ability to broadcast publicly from those devices is becoming a matter of a few keystrokes. We are being presented with the opportunity to interact with and give our opinions on what other people are saying when they’ree thousands of miles away in real time.
This opportunity can be used to deepen the dialogue of our personal and collective understanding about life, and share wisdom and insights that can be used for the benefit of all. All too often, however, this space becomes a forum for knee-jerk reactions and simplistic black-or-white characterizations on important issues that only serve to polarize rather than advance the discussion.
-->Watch now: Sign up for the free 5G Summit starting and hear from 40 of the world's leading experts on the subject, all FREE! Click here to register now!
The Dalai Lama’s Remarks On Refugees
The remarks the Dalai Lama made on immigration and the refugee crisis during a recent tour of Europe are a case in point. I think we will all concede that the Dalai Lama is a pretty intelligent fellow, and certainly believes highly in compassion for all of humanity. He may not be the most eloquent speaker of the English language, and so he may not always be able to convey the optimal nuance when speaking about highly-charged geopolitical issues like refugees. That being said, his ideas certainly deserve a step-back and an examination of the bigger picture, which involves not only the context of his Buddhist faith but the realities of material-world geopolitics.
While speaking to an audience in Rotterdam in the video below, one questioner said that she was surprised to have read statements the Dalai Lama had made, specifically that ‘Europe belongs to the Europeans,’ and that the refugees should go back to their home country. She asked him to give more details as to how that squares up with all the wonderful things he has said about love, acceptance, and equality. He acknowledges the responsibility that countries have to provide shelter and other necessities to those escaping unlivable and dangerous conditions at home, but stays true to his point on the matter:
The refugees, from different countr(ies), I think, they themselves also should think, their home is their own land. So, in their own home, killing, bully(ing), a lot of suffering, therefore, they, something like, escape, so European countries must provide shelter to them…then the aim is, eventually they should return to their own land, to rebuild their own country. That’s my view, right from the beginning.
Social Media Response
For those who like to make the most simplistic and polarized interpretation of the Dalai Lama’s words, social media provides an immediate outlet for rebuking the words they seem to be taking very personally:
Dalai Lama: Europe belongs to Europeans. Refugees should go home.
Where were you when these European countries bombarded these muslim countries and destroyed everything. Bloody Hypocrite and bootlicker. @DalaiLama
— Younis A Bhat | یونس بٹ (@NtzYBhat) September 13, 2018
Dalai is a bigot of the first order. “The Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, told an audience in Malmö that refugees should return to their native countries to rebuild them.” Should the Dalai not lead by example by returning to Tibet.https://t.co/jcUrgvg3la
— Sabina Basha (@SabinaBasha) September 13, 2018
However, this form of sound-byte communication, where all context is shed and key words and phrases are highlighted to give rise to extremist interpretations, is not going to contribute to the evolution of this discussion about immigration. I believe the Dalai Lama’s words, which represent a bold step into the material realm of geopolitics, are worth ruminating over through a basic context about cultures, nations and borders.
Think of all cultures as collective experiments. Each culture has within it a morality, a notion of what they consider to be good and bad. Friedrich Nietzsche, often lauded as the great ‘Historian of Culture,’ said it this way in his epic allegory Thus Spoke Zarathustra:
Many lands saw Zarathustra, and many peoples: thus he discovered the good and bad of many peoples. No greater power did Zarathustra find on earth than good and bad. No people could live without first valuing; if a people will maintain itself, however, it must not value as its neighbor values.
Much that passed for good with one people was regarded with scorn and contempt by another: thus I found it. Much found I here called bad, which was there decked with purple honors. Never did the one neighbor understand the other: ever did his soul marvel at his neighbour’s delusion and wickedness.
A table of values hangs over every people. Behold. it is the table of their triumphs; Behold. it is the voice of their Will to Power. It is laudable, what they think hard; what is indispensable and hard they call good; and what relieves in the direst distress, the unique and hardest of all, – they extol as holy.
Each culture evolves and becomes strong (or becomes weak or dies out) based on the effectiveness of their ‘table of values,’ their ideas of what is right and wrong. The more the citizens of a culture all reach for the things that are hard and yet are indispensable (what they consider ‘right action’), the stronger the collective becomes.
Note that a ‘culture’ is often associated with a ‘race,’ but these are not really the same thing. Race is genetic, culture is ideological. Hence many races can be part of the same culture.
Nations And Borders
Now think of nations with borders as the incubator for their experiment of culture, in which there is territorial space where it is safe and possible to carry out the experiment of that culture’s particular morals.
Let’s not think about nations and borders as restrictions and limiters of the human experience, or as the ‘source’ of war in the world, before we first recognize that much of human progress has been achieved through the incubation of cultures within bordered territories. This is not to say that nations and borders should be considered the be-all and end-all of human evolution; again, let’s keep things in perspective here.
Recontextualizing The Dalai Lama’s Words
If we can accept the general definitions I’ve laid out, then we can see that the Dalai Lama is very much talking with a deep understanding of the purpose behind cultures, nations, and borders. We are at a stage of human evolution where we are not quite ready to abandon the nation/border model, because the various cultural experiments have not quite run their course, and we have not quite developed nations that have become fully self-realized. There are currently no nations that have become sovereign enough to be in a position to do nothing more than be of service to all other nations.
And so, while recognizing on the one hand that love, humanity, acceptance, and charity are all aspects of the human experience that he espouses deeply, the Dalai Lama also recognizes that the pattern of increasing refugee migration in the world is causing a serious breakdown in the ‘evolution experiments’ going on in each host nation, to the extent that conditions globally for human life and human evolution are deteriorating. It is, I believe, with a deep compassion for the entire human race and our prospects to collectively evolve to a higher place that the Dalai Lama says that refugees should consider in their heart their role of potentially returning to their homeland when conditions allow it.
While many people still jump the gun to judge statements made by public figures, our task in the awakening community is to appreciate–even relish–the delicious depth of nuance in these complex issues. For example, the Dalai Lama is not telling people that they should not immigrate to another country if they have a strong desire to assimilate into that country’s culture. He is addressing the massive exoduses of one culture into another, where those involved have not necessarily made a conscious choice to leave their culture behind and adopt a new one, in order to strengthen the cultural experiment they are going into.
Yes, of course, ultimately the aim is for unity, and the grandest experiment that overlooks all the other experiments is one in which the elimination of all borders, nations, and cultural identities will be part of the human collective becoming one. Let’s just not get ahead of ourselves here, and ground our words and ideas in an understanding of where human evolution is at right now, as I believe the Dalai Lama does.
Our Biology Responds To Events Before They Even Happen
- The Facts:
Multiple experiments have shown strong evidence for precognition in several different ways. One of them comes in the form of activity within the heart and the brain responding to events before they even happen.
- Reflect On:
Do we have extra human capacities we are unaware of? Perhaps we can learn them, develop them, and use them for good. Perhaps when the human race is ready, we will start learning more.
Is precognition real? There are many examples suggesting that yes, it is. The remote viewing program conducted by the CIA in conjunction with Stanford University was a good example of that. After its declassification in 1995, or at least partial declassification, the Department of Defense and those involved revealed an exceptionally high success rate:
To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the (remote viewing) phenomenon. Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise… The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions. (source)
The kicker? Part of remote viewing involves peering into future events as well as events that happened in the past.
It’s not only within the Department of Defense that we find this stuff, but a lot of science is emerging on this subject as well.
For example, a study (meta analysis) published in the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience titled “Predicting the unpredictable: critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity” examined a number of experiments regarding this phenomenon that were conducted by several different laboratories. These experiments indicate that the human body can actually detect randomly delivered stimuli that occur 1-10 seconds in advance. In other words, the human body seems to know of an event and reacts to the event before it has occurred. What occurs in the human body before these events are physiological changes that are measured regarding the cardiopulmonary, the skin, and the nervous system.
A few years ago, the chief scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, Dr. Dean Radin, visited the scientists over at HearthMath Institute and shared the results of one of his studies. Radin is also one of multiple scientists who authored the paper above. These studies, as mentioned above, tracked the autonomic nervous system, physiological changes, etc.
Scientists at HeartMath Institute (HMI) added more protocols, which included measuring participants’ brain waves (EEG), their hearts’ electrical activity (ECG), and their heart rate variability (HRV).
As HMI explains:
Twenty-six adults experienced in using HeartMath techniques and who could sustain a heart-coherent state completed two rounds of study protocols approximately two weeks apart. Half of the participants completed the protocols after they intentionally achieved a heart-coherent state for 10 minutes. The other half completed the same procedures without first achieving heart coherence. Then they reversed the process for the second round of monitoring, with the first group not becoming heart-coherent before completing the protocols and the second group becoming heart-coherent before. The point was to test whether heart coherence affected the results of the experiment.
Participants were told the study’s purpose was to test stress reactions and were unaware of its actual purpose. (This practice meets institutional-review-board standards.) Each participant sat at a computer and was instructed to click a mouse when ready to begin.
The screen stayed blank for six seconds. The participant’s physiological data was recorded by a special software program, and then, one by one, a series of 45 pictures was displayed on the screen. Each picture, displayed for 3 seconds, evoked either a strong emotional reaction or a calm state. After each picture, the screen went blank for 10 seconds. Participants repeated this process for all 45 pictures, 30 of which were known to evoke a calm response and 15 a strong emotional response.
The results of the experiment were fascinating to say the least. The participants’ brains and hearts responded to information about the emotional quality of the pictures before the computer flashed them (random selection). This means that the heart and brain were both responding to future events. The results indicated that the responses happened, on average, 4.8 seconds before the computer selected the pictures.
How mind-altering is that?
Even more profound, perhaps, was data showing the heart received information before the brain. “It is first registered from the heart,” Rollin McCraty Ph.D. explained, “then up to the brain (emotional and pre-frontal cortex), where we can logically relate what we are intuiting, then finally down to the gut (or where something stirs).”
Another significant study (meta-analysis) that was published in Journal of Parapsychology by Charles Honorton and Diane C. Ferrari in 1989 examined a number of studies that were published between 1935 and 1987. The studies involved individuals’ attempts to predict “the identity of target stimuli selected randomly over intervals ranging from several hundred million seconds to one year following the individuals responses.” These authors investigated over 300 studies conducted by over 60 authors, using approximately 2 million individual trials by more than 50,000 people. (source)
It concluded that their analysis of precognition experiments “confirms the existence of a small but highly significant precognition effect. The effect appears to be repeatable; significant outcomes are reported by 40 investigators using a variety of methodological paradigms and subject populations. The precognition effect is not merely an unexplained departure from a theoretical chance baseline, but rather is an effect that covaries with factors known to influence more familiar aspects of human performance.” (source)
“There seems to be a deep concern that the whole field will be tarnished by studying a phenomenon that is tainted by its association with superstition, spiritualism and magic. Protecting against this possibility sometimes seems more important than encouraging scientific exploration or protecting academic freedom. But this may be changing.”
– Cassandra Vieten, PhD and President/CEO at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (source)
We are living in a day and age where new information and evidence are constantly emerging, challenging what we once thought was real or what we think we know about ourselves as human beings. It’s best to keep an open mind. Perhaps there are aspects of ourselves and our consciousness that have yet to be discovered. Perhaps if we learn and grow from these studies, they can help us better ourselves and others.
The 5G Health Summit Starts Tomorrow (June 1st) – Reserve Your Free Spot Here
- The Facts:
A global online summit featuring doctors, scientists & activists addressing the health concerns of 5G technology and what people can do about it is set to take place the first week of June and it's free to sign up.
- Reflect On:
Why are safety concerns that've been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals called a "conspiracy theory?" Why is this idea ridiculed? Why don't our federal health regulatory agencies simply to some health safety testing before rolling it out?
Some of the world’s leading scientists, doctors and activists are gathering for a free online summit that begins on Monday June 1st and will run for approximately one week. The summit will dive into the health concerns of 5G technology, and why it’s a concern and what people can do about it. The summit is completely free to sign up and watch, and you can do so here.
We’ve also put together an E-book titled “Is 5G Safe? An Easy to Understand Guide” summarizing the published peer-reviewed research that is raising concerns about electromagnetic radiation that’s emitted from our favourite wireless devices, cell phones and more, as well as novel 5G technology. It’s a great resource that you can share with family or friends who desire to look at the proof, research, evidence and concerns that thousands of doctors and scientists have been and are creating awareness about all over the globe. We wrote it in language designed to be simple and factual.
Once you sign up for the summit, you get access to the free E-book.
It’s quite strange that any researched journalist could dismiss the health concerns of 5G technology, as well as 4G and 3G, when there are nearly 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies that raise cause for concern. A study published in 2019 in Frontiers in Public Health is one of many that raises concerns about 5G technology, explaining how there is no safety testing, and that in vivo and in vitro studies regarding this type of technology and it’s predecessors have shown that it’s harmful to human health, even at levels below current “safety” limits.
At the end of the day, whether you believe this type of technology is safe or you don’t, would it not be in the best interests of everybody to have the technology go through some type of required safety testing? Shouldn’t any technology that has any sort of biological effect be put through safety testing? Why has there not been any safety testing?
In December 2018, US. Senator Richard Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology. At a hearing, that took place last year, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and did the same thing to other industry representatives that were in attendance for not putting the technology through safety testing. You can watch a clip of that hearing and read more about it, here.
How can our federal health regulatory agencies approve products that are clearly a cause for concern?
This is why the summit is going to be such a great resource. It will answer many questions, and again, let people know what they can do about it!
Sign up for the free 5G Summit starting June 1st. Hear from 40 of the world’s leading experts on the subject, all FREE! Click here to register now!
Dr. Buttar Reveals Declassified Government Report Related to 5G Dangers
- The Facts:
Dr. Rashid Butter discusses a declassified report on millimetre wave technology and the effects it has on human health. These are the same waves used in 5G technology.
- Reflect On:
If we already know these waves cause harm to human health, why do we use them in airport scanners? Why are we about to roll out an entire wireless network based on these technologies?
People often say 5G hasn’t been tested, and to some extent that is true. But given 5G uses millimetre wave technology and that technology has been studied for quite some time, it has obviously been tested by those who have worked on them. So why hasn’t this information been widely released? Why are we not looking at the available data on millimetre wave technology as it relates to 5G?
Recently we came across 7 Russian studies that were summarized in a report declassified through the CIA. These studies were declassified in 2012 and marked “For Goverment Use Only.” From what you can gather very quickly in this report, the conclusions should shut down 5G rollout instantly. At least until someone can show, beyond any reasonable doubt, that this technology is safe.
Let’s have a quick look at how this report was concluded:
“Thus the conducted investigations indicate high biological activity and an unfavourable influence of millimeter radiowaves on the organism. The expression of the biological reactions increased with an increase of the period of iridation and depended on individual characteristics of the organism.”
What this translates to in plain English is, millimetre-wave frequencies do affect the human body negatively, and the longer the exposure, the more damage that occurs. Since 5G uses millimetre waves and is set to push a constant barrage of frequency on humans anywhere they go, this would mean sustained wave exposure, and thus inevitable biological damage.
Incredibly, these are the same wave technologies used in airport fully body scanners that we have been raising awareness about for years. It’s important to note, you CAN opt out of going through those scanners.
Dr. Rashid Buttar has given an incredible interview where he goes page by page as to exactly what this declassified CIA research reveals. The report summarizes 7 studies on the effects of millimeter-wave radiation levels between 37-60GHz. These levels are “safe” according to government, but that is NOT what the science says.
As we have said for the last year and a half, now is a potent time to understand the dangers of 5G and work to stop its rollout. This interview is a must listen. Click here to watch Dr. Rashid Buttar’s interview.
As we can tell in our world right now, a ton of truth is coming to the surface, the environment to create change is ripe. If we can stay grounded, in our hearts and avoid descending into hate, we can TRULY make a big difference here.
Dr. Buttar Reveals Declassified Government Report Related to 5G Dangers
People often say 5G hasn’t been tested, and to some extent that is true. But given 5G uses millimetre wave...
University Mathematician Decodes The Crop Circle With A Binary Code & Extraterrestrial Face
Did you know that crop circles are actually real? How they’re made and who or what is making them is...