Connect with us

Alternative News

A “Little Ice Age” Is Where We Are Heading, According To Multiple Scientists

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    We are approaching a new Solar Minimum, something that could happen within the next decade. Our sun is going through a drastic cooling period, and multiple scientists are predicting that we are heading into a "mini ice age."

  • Reflect On:

    Human activity (deforestation etc) has destroyed our natural systems that regulate various atmospheric gasses. Why is there no focus on rebuilding these systems as there is on our CO2 output? Why do we have so many solutions yet no implementation?

A common theme in our world is misinformation, and if you follow the brilliant work of independent scientists and journalists, you will see it’s currently plaguing the field of mainstream science in multiple areas. This is not just due to error on part of researchers, but the politicization of science, something scientists, especially with regards to medical and climate science, are gathering together and speaking up about every single year.

advertisement - learn more

Credible, dissenting scientific voices go largely unheard by the mainstream media and education. As a result, most of our beliefs and thoughts about what is happening on our planet come from programming, brainwashing and mass marketing heavy with mainstream politicized science.

Overall human consciousness has been influenced by the global elite, simply for the purposes of driving us into acceptance of the limited, and often ridiculous, solutions they pose for the problems that they create. This is why critical thinking and independent research is crucial for citizens. Seeking out multiple sources for information is important while living in the age of information. Thankfully, there are a lot of people waking up right now, and as a result, many things are shifting and new sources are emerging.

A Coming Ice Age?

When I say we may be at the start of the next Ice Age, I am not really talking about a massive armageddon scenario, it’s important to be clear on that. Instead, all of the research that’s being put out now, that’s not connected to human-induced climate change, is showing that we are entering a period in Earth’s cycle where we will likely be experiencing a cooling effect, not a warming one. Scientists are calling this a “little ice age.”

The latest information on this topic seems to become from a scientist named Martin Mlynczak, from NASA’s Langley Research Centre. According to his research, and the research of what seems to be a number of scientists some of whom are mentioned later in the article, the Sun’s ultraviolet output has severely dropped, and our atmosphere is responding to it. There are multiple parts that constitute our atmosphere, and the thermosphere is one of them. It’s the part of our atmosphere that seems to react to solar activity the most.

This was the topic of a viral article that’s made its way across the internet claiming that this is indicative of a mini ice age.

advertisement - learn more

There are so many factors influencing the global climate, it goes far beyond human-induced change, but also into the activity of our Sun, and space weather overall. There are a number of factors, and there is still a lot to learn about our climate, climatic cycles, and why it operates the way it does.

Based on information from NASA’s TIMED satellite, our thermosphere is experiencing a cooling effect which always happens when there is a Solar Minimum, something we are currently experiencing.

To help keep track of what’s happening in the thermosphere, Mlynczak and colleagues recently introduced the “Thermosphere Climate Index” (TCI)–a number expressed in Watts that tells how much heat NO molecules are dumping into space. During Solar Maximum, TCI is high (“Hot”); during Solar Minimum, it is low (“Cold”).

Right now it’s cold. In fact, the Thermosphere Climate Index is close to setting a new space age record for cold. Mlynczak said that”We’re not quite there yet…but it could happen in a matter of months.”

Below is a historical record of the Thermosphere Climate Index. Mlynczak and colleagues recently published a paper on the TCI showing that the state of the thermosphere can be discussed using a set of five plain language terms: Cold, Cool, Neutral, Warm, and Hot.

The thermosphere is just one layer of the Earth’s atmosphere, as all of them play important roles with regards to regulating our climatic systems. It sits directly above the mesosphere, and below the exosphere, and extends from approximately 90 km to between 500km and 1,000km above the Earth. Much of the X-ray and UV radiation from the Sun is absorbed in the thermosphere. When the Sun is very active and emitting more high energy radiation, the thermosphere gets hotter and expands or “puffs up”.

In the thermosphere, temperatures climb quite fast in the lower part of it, then they even out, level off and increase with altitude. It’s a great way to measure the effect of Solar activity, as Solar activity strongly influences temperature in the thermosphere. Changes in the thermosphere, like the cooling effect, have also been contributed to an increase in our Carbon Dioxide output, which ironically has a cooling effect on our thermosphere. What happens in the lower atmosphere can also change what happens in the thermosphere, and vice versa, but there is still a lot to be discovered, and more research is needed.

The thermosphere has been cooling for a long time, but again, mainstream publications constantly blame this on the increase in C02 levels without ever mentioning that it’s directly correlated with solar activity.  Scafetta & West (2006) estimated that 25-35% of global warming in the 1980-2000 period was attributable to solar variability. Other scientists disagree, finding no evidence of global warming due to solar activity.

How Does The ‘Mini Ice Age’ Link In?

Well, the thermosphere, as mentioned above, is a great way to measure solar activity and how it can and does affect our climate. But the focus here is the Sun, as a number of researchers have pointed towards a ‘cooling effect.’ Just because the thermosphere is responding to the Sun’s cooling down phase, does not mean we are going to see the same result in the lower atmosphere. So to imply that a mass cooling effect within the thermosphere will trigger an ice age not correct.

That being said, solar activity does indeed have many researchers positing a mini ice age,

For example, Nils-Axel Mörner from the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Institute states,

By about 2030-2040, the Sun will experience a new grand solar minimum. This is evident from multiple studies of quite different characteristics: the phasing of sunspot cycles, the cyclic observations of North Atlantic behaviour over the past millennium, the cyclic pattern of cosmogenic ra-dionuclides in natural terrestrial archives, the motions of the Sun with respect to the centre of mass, the planetary spin-orbit coupling, the planetary conjunction history and the general planetary solar terrestrial interaction. During the previous grand solar minima—i.e. the Spörer Minimum (ca 1440-1460), the Maunder Minimum (ca 1687-1703) and the Dalton Minimum (ca 1809-1821)—the climatic conditions deteriorated into Little Ice Age periods.

The idea that solar activity is not affecting Earth’s climate is extremely fishy and doesn’t make much sense when you go through the literature, but it seems to be brushed off within mainstream academia, and hardly studied. It definitely made me scratch my head when IFL Science, for example, put out a statement saying “The Sun simply does not have that large an effect on our climate compared to human activity.” This is a very ridiculous and irresponsible statement. It’s also important that readers recognize there isn’t even any course to back up such a false claim.

Don’t believe what is written, research what is written. What’s worse is the ridicule factor, the way mainstream publications attack any narrative that presents an explanation for climate change that is not human induced. Something is very wrong with this picture, regardless of your stance on the ‘global warming’ phenomenon. There is more on this later in the article.

The paper  by Morner  goes on to make some very important points:

So as you can see, the comment from IFL science quoted above, again, is simply not true. I’ve provided one of many soures available here, and I encourage other writers to do the same.

The author goes on to conclude:

Durinng the last three grand solar minima…global climate experienced Little Ice Age conditions. Arctic water penetrated to the south all the way down to Mid-Portugal, and Europe experienced severe climatic conditions…The Arctic ice over exapanded significantly…By 2030-2040, we will be in a New Grand Solar Minimum, which by analogy to past minima must be assumed to lead to significant climatic deterioration with ice expansion in the Artctic..We now seem to be in possession of quite convergent data…This precludes a continual warming as claimed by the IPCC project, instead of this, we are likely to face a new Little Ice Age.

According to the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS,

A new model of the Sun’s solar cycle is producing unprecedentedly accurate predictions of irregularities within the Sun’s 11-year heartbeat. The model draws on dynamo effects in two layers of the Sun, one close to the surface and one deep within its convection zone. Predictions from the model suggest that solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the ‘mini ice age’ that began in 1645. (source)

A few years ago, the National Astronomy Meeting in Wales was held, where Valentina Zharkova, a mathematics professor from Northumbria University (UK), presented a model that can predict what solar cycles will look like far more accurately than was previously possible. She states that the model can predict their influence with an accuracy of 97 percent, and says it is showing that Earth is heading for a “mini ice age” in approximately fifteen years.

Zharkova and her team came up with the model using a method called “principal component analysis” of the magnetic field observations, from the Wilcox Solar Observatory in California. Looking forward to the next few solar cycles, her model predicts that from 2030 to 2040 there will be cause for a significant reduction in solar activity, which again, will lead to a mini ice age. According to Zharkova. You can read more about that here.

Again, these are just a few examples of multiple scientists pointing to these facts.

How Human-Induced Climate Change Fits Into The Picture

The “97 percent” tagline is often used to demonize those who question human-induced climate change, and the mainstream media will do their best to make those who question it, no matter their background, credentials, or credibility, look foolish. This is a common tactic used by the elite. They ridicule opposing views that threaten their control and profit. Ivar Giaever, a Norwegian-American physicist who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973, compares current climate science to pseudoscience.

Based on my research, the top scientists within this field are not all in agreeance, in fact, the majority of them may all agree with the narrative of this article. But you will not see them on CNN.

What is going on here?

The “climate hysteria” that most scientists in the field label what we see today as is a result of mass media, brainwashing, and the politicization of climate science. Take Dr. Richard Lindzen, for example, he is one of the hundreds who refer to this type of narrative (hysteria) and claims that climate scientists raising this issue have been extremely demonized.  Lindzen is actually one of the world’s top experts in the field and lead author of “Physical Climate Process and Feedbacks,” Chapter7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Third Assessment report on climate change.

He and many others have been quite outspoken regarding the political influence that weighs heavy on all IPCC publications. The final reports and conclusions are drawn, as expressed by Lindzen in multiple lectures, are actually written by the politicians.

How Human Activity Is Throwing Things Out of Whack

Another important point to realize is that environmental degradation is never really addressed, the focus constantly seems to be on our carbon output. Historically, we’ve seen periods in Earth’s history, prior to the industrial revolution, where CO2 levels were just as high as they are now. But, what we haven’t seen before is the complete destruction and disruption of our national systems that mitigate CO2, control it, and regulate it.

We’ve completely polluted our planet, and perhaps the focus shouldn’t be on CO2 output, which is already at the moment highly questioned with its connection to climate change, but our destruction of the systems in place to regulate our climate. As well as pollution and degradation. Why should the people have to pay for the actions of a system unwilling to change? That being said, those of us who question the mainstream narrative on this topic seems to be the most passionate about clean energy technology, and ‘saving’ our planet.

The notion of static,unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. The fact that ‘the developed world went into hysterics over changes in global mean temperature anomaly of a few tenths of a degree will astound futuregenerations. Such hysteria simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of reptition for truth, and the expliotation of these weaknesses by politcians, environmental promotors, and, after 20 years of media drum beating, many others asl well…Ice ages have occurred in a hundred thousand year cycle for the last 700 thousand years, and there have been previous periods that appear to have been warmer than the present despite CO2 levels being lower than they are now. More recently, we have the medieval warm period and the little ice age. Durin the latter, alpine glaciers advanced to the chagrin of overrun villages. Since the beginning of the 19th Century, these glaciers have been retreating. Frankly, we don’t fully understand either. –Lindzen

Human beings no doubt have had an impact on the climate, for sure, but other factors have been ignored and the human impact has been ramped up for ulterior motives, it’s hysteria and fear that’s being created in order to justify measures that benefit the global elite, the ones who take advantage of us and enslave us, while we live in the illusion that we’re actually free. It’s like a bird being born in a cage.

The point is, if we want to learn anything real about this subject, we must turn our eye away from the mainstream, and our ears towards the actual scientists within the field and what they are actually saying. We must actually look into things, we must read and educate ourselves instead of relying on authoritative figures to disseminate information.

Below is a great debate with a few scientists on both sides of the coin, one that approaches the issue from both sides. All will acknowedge that the field is still split on this issue. That’s not really the narrative we see from the mainstream.

Global warming is about politics and power rather than science. In science, there is an attempt to clarify; in global warming, language is misused in order to confuse and mislead the public. The misuse of language extends to the misuse of models. For advocated of policies allegedly addressing global warming, the role of models is not to predict but rather to justify the claim that catastrophe is possible. As they understand, proving something to be impossible is itself almost impossible.

The quote above comes from Lindzen, who in the video below educated people on what the scientists are actually saying, compared to what the media tells us they are saying.

The Takeaway

This is a big topic that branches off into so many discussions, like the fact as to why climate engineering is never mentioned? Weather modification and the drastic manipulation of our atmosphere has been proposed as a potential solution to this supposed problem. The process involves seeding the atmosphere with sun reflective particles. There is a lot of evidence suggesting that atmospheric weather manipulation has been occurring for a long time, who knows why. What we’re told is that it’s for the purposes of climate change mitigation, but again, when has our government ever exposed the truth on subjects that are classified simply because a powerful group of people deem it a ‘national security’ issue?

Recognize that, first, that I am in no way a climate change denier. Clearly, our climate is constantly changing. I am also, as most people who question the mainstream global warming narrative, completely for the transition into cleaner energy technology. It seems our ‘leaders’ are as well, but they’re only interested after sitting on top of decades of transformative technology. Only within the past few years have elitist groups been divesting into clean energy, simply because they want to control the entire energy industry as they do now with oil, therefore they must oversee its transition.

New clean and free energy threatens our entire economy, therefore to them, the transition must be made in a way that does not collapse it.

Bottom line, fossil fuels are no longer needed, there are “breakthroughs available..that never see the light of day” (Dr. Brian O’Leary) that could completely revolutionize our plant. The same group of people who seem to be pushing climate hysteria are also behind the suppression of clean energy technology, which doesn’t make much sense at all. At least this is what I believe based on my research.

Anytime the mainstream makes you feel stupid for questioning something or demonizes and uses ridicule to shut down the opposing points, you know something us up. We see the same thing happening with vaccines today. The good news is, people are waking up every single day, and what seems so obvious cannot stay in the shadows for too long. The truth eventually presents itself.

To stand idle and not create awareness on how the preservation of our Earth is being used by the global elite is not an option. Letting so-called “leaders” of our world meet every single year to talk has resulted in zero action in solutions that could have been implemented decades ago. All that happens is taxpayers are squeezed. What’s worse is that those meeting to discuss it know that.

Think for yourself.

We Need Your Support...

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

A UFO The Size Of Planet Earth Seen Hovering Near Saturn

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The picture here comes from a long time NASA scientist, one of many photos covered-up and hid from the public from the Voyager mission in 1980. That mission was tasked with photographing Saturn, its rings and its moons.

  • Reflect On:

    What does this mean for humanity? Why the cover-up? Are we ready to accept that this may be a reality? What kinds of implications are there from the realization that we are not alone, and that highly advanced, intelligent beings are out there?

The pictures NASA got back from the Voyager mission to Saturn in 1980 were apparently so mind-altering that they locked them up–at least that’s what retired U.S. Army Command Sergeant Major Bob Dean said in this lecture. He also showed numerous photographs from the Apollo missions that were never released to the public. You can view some of those photographs here. Multiple governments, like Russia, have been calling for an international investigation as to where photographs, footage and Moon rocks disappeared to.

The picture above does not come from Dean, it comes from one of his good friends Norman Bergrun, a scientist and engineer who was part of NASA’s voyager program. He worked at NASA for decades at the Ames Research Centre. He also worked at Lockheed Martin where he managed the Polaris missile tests. Unfortunately, he recently passed. You can view his obituary here.

He is a legend for going public.

Luminous Source

What is the picture of? It’s a “luminous source,” that comes from Bergrun’s Book, “The Ringmakers of Saturn.” He had to go through a lot of trouble to publish it, and had to leave the country in order to do so, as Dean explained in the lecture linked above.

According to Bergrun, there are several large craft “proliferating” out around Saturn and its moons. His book goes into much greater detail, and although it’s hard to find and costs thousands of dollars, it is linked online, here.

Frustrated By Non-Disclosure

According to Dean, Bergrun got frustrated later in life that the decision was made not to tell the public what they had photographed at Saturn. My previous article Long-Time Nasa Scientist Blows The Whistle On Tall Black Extraterrestrial Beings describes Bergrun exposing the existence of what he calls extraterrestrial ‘vehicles’ that were responsible for making the rings around Saturn.

advertisement - learn more

In a rare interview he gave with Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot (below), he expressed his great concern of the UFO cover-up and stated with enthusiasm that “people have got to be made aware that those things are real.” I’ve presented this video in multiple articles, but you cannot present this interview if you’re writing an article about Norman Bergrun!

The Takeaway

In his book, Norman makes it a clear point to emphasize that these objects have probably been around much longer than we have. He also states that if there was any ill intent towards our planet, something probably would have happened by now and there is a reason that these objects (which he stated are intelligently controlled, not by us) have not come in close proximity to our planet. By coming closer than they already are they may, and already probably do have some effects on our own weather. This is something Norman also mentions in his book.

A lot of ridicule and fear exists behind this topic, and today it’s no longer taboo as mainstream disclosure has begun. We are becoming more aware, and despite mainstream media and the global elite having a lot to lose from the disclosure of this type of information (propulsion systems, oil, etc..), the truth is leaking out. It’s a field filled with information and disinformation, so one has to be cautious and remain skeptical. At the end of the day, we know that we are not alone, and it has huge implications for all areas of humanity–not the least of which is that it will ultimately force humanity to look within.

More awareness of this presence is coinciding with a massive ‘spiritual’ awakening that’s happening on the planet, and this is not by coincidence. It seems that a growing awareness of what’s out there will serve to help humanity better understand itself.

We Need Your Support...

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Google CEO’s Testimony Further Collapses Russian Interference Narrative

Published

on

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Recent testimony from Google CEO Sundar Pichai takes yet another leg out of the crumbling Russian election-meddling narrative used to cast doubt on the Trump presidency.

  • Reflect On:

    Is the Deep State, through mainstream media, simply projecting all the things they do themselves? How else would they know how to build these narratives so well? Breaking this illusion is an important step in awakening our consciousness.

The importance of specific nuances within the recent 2016 Presidential election in the United States is not widely discussed as we often get too caught up in political sides, our own narratives and propaganda from mainstream media.

Point blank, this recent election illustrated a changing of the guard when looking specifically at the shadow government or Deep State. This is missed by the average person as their faith still rests in democracy, the left-right voting paradigm and the idea that the government actually runs the country. This nuance is missed by some in alternative media sources who, even though they may recognize the existence of the cabal, cannot get out from behind their own narrative enough to recognize the signs that the cabal is losing power.

And of course, those who watch, listen to and rely on mainstream media are simply misinformed on most issues–deeply. Mainstream media is owned and operated by this cabal, and of late they’ve been clinging to their narratives like there’s no tomorrow. The key takeaway when discussing this nuance is in the fact that this isn’t about left vs right, but about the cabal losing power. More on this later.

RussiaGate Right Out Of The Gate

Shortly after the 2016 election ended and people had gotten over the shock that Donald Trump would be the next president of the United States, ‘fake news’ and ‘Russian election meddling’ became the focus for why Hillary lost. While at first many blamed ‘stupid old white men,’ a meme sill alive today, the focus soon changed to a new and potentially more potent theory, fully supported by the DNC, that Russia must have been the cause.

The problem was, the theory had little to no evidence, and that has not changed. It’s also proving to be a very large distraction that still lives on to this day regardless of the fact that time and time again, it is proven to be illegitimate.

Still, mainstream media continues to promote it, as seen in the Bezos-owned Washington Post article Without the Russians, Trump Wouldn’t Have Won, or in a NewYorker article entitled How Russia Helped Swing the Election for Trumpwhich posits “…forensic analysis of the available evidence and concludes that Russia very likely delivered Trump’s victory.”

advertisement - learn more

CNN came under a lot of fire during the Russian meddling allegations for continually publishing fake news stories about it. Some CNN reporters even resigned after they had to retract false stories. There is also a video of a CNN reporter stating “they have nothing” and “it’s for ratings”, when referring to Russian election interference. More on all of that here.

Google CEO’s Damning Testimony

The reason why this narrative is so important to the deep state is multifaceted. It continues to promote control over social media networks, it continues to produce the idea that Trump only won due to a rigged election, it continues to create hate and divide amongst the populace, it continues to created an enemy in Russia, who now is being blamed in some mainstream circles as the cause of France’s unrest! Whether people believe it all or not, it still continues to distract them from the underlying reality that the deep state is losing power and falling apart at the seams.

In the most recent development, Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai testified about political bias and data collection before a Congressional committee on December 11th, 2018. He was questioned about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and what he revealed essentially collapsed the entire narrative. He discussed transparently that the number of ads that were purchased via Google by “Russians” totaled less than $5000 worth, and that the ads didn’t push for Trump or Hillary.

What should be headlines all over America, is nothing more than brushed under the rug by MSM. Below you can hear more analysis on this by RT news. I do want to point out, I don’t particularly support the tone of this interview, but nonetheless, the analysis and facts are there.

Projection

So we have to ask the question: what is really going on here? When we closely analyze what’s been taking place in recent times, we begin to see that there is a great deal of projection going on here.

The ploy to blame Russia for election meddling seems more likely borne out of the idea that Americans are easily convinced that Russia is an enemy and they do bad things. Further to that, the Deep State, including the Clintons, had allegedly been colluding with Russia in the Uranium One deal. And the FBI refuses to release three dozen memos that would yield a full investigation. Why? And why does there seem to be a gag order on this story in mainstream media?

Claims that “fake news” is a huge problem and that we need to crack down are abundant in the mainstream; the fact is that the Deep State uses mainstream media to control and limit narratives and purposefully misinform the public on events. Note that at least 200 independent media pages have been ousted by Facebook after political pressure from this election. Why? Because independent media was able to bring different narratives to millions and millions of people, a huge threat to the mainstream media and the Deep State. They then called these independent media outlets “fake news” purveyors and removed them from people’s view. Thus, the very thing they are calling out others for is what they themselves are doing, and of course with all their experience they know how to do that VERY well.

Headlines could very easily be all over mainstream media about these things, but they aren’t. Instead, search results are overwhelmingly littered with the Russian election meddling narrative at the simple touch of typing the word ‘Russian’ in Google.

The Takeaway

Awakening to these truths is a crucial step in breaking the illusion about our world so we can properly move forward. Breaking the illusion IS a consciousness-based process as well. It’s about a level of expansion within ourselves that allows us to awaken to the reality beyond the manipulation of the mind and ego consciousness. The world becomes much more clear when we shift to this state, and the solutions that arise out of this state of being are not ones that continue to fuel our currently polarized world, but ones that will end the existence of this cabal, and that will further move along the process of allowing humanity to thrive.

The reason Trump is a threat, and why we mentioned above that the important nuance is a changing of the guard, is because he is playing the role of figurehead for a deeper intelligence community that has long been aligned together for the purposes of removing the Deep State from power. The environment to achieve this and ultimately move this process along is created by our collective consciousness. We must evolve our consciousness along with these actions for us to see them fully realized.

We Need Your Support...

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Yellow Vests Update: CNN Says They Are Creating Chaos, But Are They?

Published

on

Credit: Photo by IBL/REX/Shutterstock

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    In a recent CNN article, they claim that the Yellow Vests are creating 'chaos in France.' But are they actually creating chaos? Or is there a bigger picture here?

  • Reflect On:

    Are we taking the time to look at multiple angles of coverage on this groundbreaking event to better determine truth? Is there a bigger play going on where the elite is scrambling to control this narrative?

France may never be the same. Protests, tear gas and more are filling the major cities in France as the “Yellow Vests” come together in the tens of thousands to raise awareness about a long list of demands they have for their government. Before we get into our most recent analysis, let’s have a recap of what has happened as of yet.

The current protest is being called the biggest and one of the most violent in the past 50 years. One of the most significant aspects of this recent uprising is multiple occurrences of police officers removing their helmets in solidarity with protesters. It brought some to tears and inspired many others, as it illustrated a level of solidarity that isn’t often seen in public protests. Everybody in France is being affected by the decisions being made by Macron and the governments of years prior, a story we covered in more detail here.

This is what we are seeing glimpses of when we watch police, firefighters, and protesters unify as people. Beyond their uniforms, they are all just people, living through an experience that affects them all. This is a terrifying reality for the Deep State as they and their system thrives off of humanity being divided, at war with one another and emotionally triggered and invested in the cabal’s system.

This is probably one of the biggest reasons why mainstream media doesn’t talk about this particular story, one where people are unifying. Instead, they want to focus on the crazy, wild protester vs the calm, needed police who protect the establishment.–Joe Martino, from his recent article explaining why the Deep State has a problem in France

Media Perception Control

This movement has seen no shortage of perception manipulation. This is why, as I’ve written about and documented many times before, intelligence/government agencies have a very close relationship with mainstream media. Mainstream media will always present events that show how much we are unifying and coming together, in a completely different manner. CE writer Richard Enos, who recently published an article with regards to what’s going on in France, sums up the issue quite well here.

Of course, what do we hear about most in the Mainstream Media when it comes to legitimate protests? An initial strategy might be to disperse the focus of the message, portray it as if people have many different agendas, ‘muddy the waters’ if you will, and hope that quenches things a bit. If the movement does not die down by itself, then we inevitably hear about how violent it has become. This one is no exception.

advertisement - learn more

But are they really violent? Or are they just presented that way? Are those who oppose these gatherings encouraged to start violence? Once a movement like this becomes so popular, are there hired ‘groups’ that come in an initiate violence? Provocateurs?

If there’s one thing that’s certain, it’s that the establishment does not like peaceful demonstrations of unity and solidarity, and they will do anything to sway the perception of the masses who are watching at home.

Don’t believe it? Look at all the mainstream headlines. As usual, they are all about violence and how order will be restored (order out of chaos, ordo ab chao, the timeless strategy of the elite). Meanwhile, the actual reason that so many ordinary citizens would go to the trouble of protesting is buried somewhere in the article and given little importance. The New York Times’ ‘Macron Inspects Damage After ‘Yellow Vest’ Protests as France Weighs State of Emergency’ is a typical example.

We have to ask ourselves: would a grassroots movement of concerned law-abiding citizens (which most citizens are) motivate these ordinary citizens to set someone’s car on fire? How could destroying another citizen’s car actually help the movement? Looting and breaking store windows? Why would law-abiding citizens take their frustrations out on innocent retail vendors? Would ordinary citizens contrive to harm civilians with bombs and gas attacks? – Richard Enos

Recent Terror Attacks?

Then suddenly, in the midst of an epic event raising so much attention, we see an alleged terror attack in Strasbourg, the perfect time to not only change the news cycle but to divert attention away from the Yellow Vets and back to FEAR and the narrative of TERRORISM! These are the big and timeless tactics used to start wars and keep people divided.

Are they legitimate? False flags like so many times in the past? Or is it all a convenient coincidence for the deep state and media?

CNN & Mainstream Put Forth Narrative

Below is a video of Joe Martino, founder of CE, providing analysis on some of the latest updates regarding the Yellow Vests, including a recent CNN piece claiming the Yellow Vets are creating ‘chaos in France.’ Big things are happening in France and the way we’re hearing about it has some very specific nuances that we will fail to recognize unless we step back and look at the bigger picture.

The Takeaway

When searching for information, it’s important to seek out multiple sources other than mainstream media. This is exactly why alternative or independent media outlets become so popular, because more people are starting to see through the lies and manipulation from mainstream outlets. Alternative media has gained the attention of millions of people, as it often presents evidence that supports a more believable, common-sense narrative that is not in the Deep State’s best interest.

The global elite lost their ability to keep all eyes on their platforms, and as a result many people have ‘woken up.’ This created a massive campaign to combat “fake news,” a tag that the mainstream originally concocted for alternative views that they considered dangerous to the status quo. And so recently the government, along with organizations like Facebook, has decided to step in and act as the ‘Ministry of Truth’ (Orwell).

Fortunately, the ‘war on fake news’ only further exposed how the global elite are trying to silence ANYTHING that opposes their plans. We are truly living in some interesting times!

“The problem of fake news isn’t solved by hoping for a referee, but rather because we as citizens, we as users of these services, help each other. We talk and we share and we point out what is fake. We point out what is true. The answer to bad speech is not censorship, the answer to bad speech is more speech. We have to exercise and spread the idea that critical thinking matters, now more than ever, given the fact that lies seem to be getting more popular.” –Edward Snowden (source)

We Need Your Support...

The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

SUPPORT CE HERE!

cards

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

EL

For as little as $3 a month, you can contribute to keeping CE alive! Thanks for being on our Hero's Team. We appreciate you and your support deeply! https://explorers.collective-evolution.com/cmm/

Thanks, you're keeping conscious media alive.