- The Facts:
China recently landed a probe on the dark side of the moon. Mainstream media claims that these are the first ever pictures taken, but that's false. It's the first time we've landed there, but we've seen photographs of this side in the past.
- Reflect On:
Why are there so many examples and credible sources regarding what's happening on the back side of the moon, yet they go completely ignored by mainstream media? This makes no sense, what is going on here?
An article on the popular website IFL Science reads, “These are the first images ever taken from the far side of the Moon.” The topic has to do with China’s space program, as they’ve landed the Change’e-4 probe in the Von Karman Crater in the Southern Hemisphere on the far side of the moon, the side that’s never visible from Earth.
There is one mistake that this media outlet and multiple other mainstream media outlets are making: These aren’t the first pictures of the dark side of the moon, it’s simply the first time we’ve ever landed on the dark side of the moon. However, even that may be questionable, given that there is a ‘secret space program‘ in existence. This became even more evident when $21 trillion dollars went missing from the Department of Defence. Investigations uncovered that these funds may be going towards black budget programs that “the commander in chief know nothing about.” (Paul Hellyer, Ex-Canadian Defence Minister)
After the landing, the Chinese probe sent back images from the dark side of the moon. It’s no doubt a major milestone for space exploration. The probe will also spend the coming months using its instruments to analyze the untouched surface, potentially helping scientists learn more about the structure and geology of the Moon, which is an area that scientists know little about.
I recently wrote an article emphasizing this, illustrating how many reputable scientists have published papers and believe that the moon may actually be artificially made, suggesting that some sort of intelligence was behind its creation, and that it may be hollow. You can read that here.
Now, I’d like to discuss why these aren’t the first images ever taken of the dark side of the moon. Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) recently published a paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. The study argues that these features may be artificial in origin, meaning that perhaps another intelligent life form built them and put them there.
One of the lead authors of that paper is the legendary Mark J. Carlotto. Carlotto is an aerospace engineer with over thirty years of experience in satellite imaging, remote sensing, signal and image processing, pattern recognition, and app development. He received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University in 1981 and has published over one hundred technical articles and seven books.
In the paper, the authors use an analysis of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images that were taken from Apollo 15,
At first glance these structures appear to be walls or towers on the lunar surface. By combining multiple images, we show the larger feature, oriented in a northeast/southwest direction, is not simply a wall but two walls on either side of a narrow valley or “passageway”. Using single image shape from shading and 3D terrain visualization we show in a computer-generated perspective view looking northeast that the southwest end appears to be the entrance to the passageway. A reverse angle view looking southwest shows the passageway ending at a rise of terrain at the other end, possibly leading underground. The terrain surrounding the two structures is not flat but appears “excavated” by some unknown mechanism, natural or artificial.
That right there proves that these are not the first ever images taken of the back side of the moon; however, this is the first time we’ve landed a probe on the back side of the moon.
The Clementine Mission
Let’s not forget the 1994 Clementine Mission to the moon. This was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile Defence Organization (BMDO) and NASA. They made some fascinating discoveries, as the mission is known for discovering water at the moon’s poles. The Deputy Manager for that mission, Dr. John Brandenburg, the inventor of the MET (Microwave Electro-Thermal) plasma thruster using water propellant for space propulsion, said that this mission was actually a photo reconnaissance mission to check out artificial structures that the government allegedly knew about on the back side of the moon. He made these statements in the documentary Aliens on the Moon. He also made some interesting statements in this lecture.
He has many publications in various journals, and is clearly brilliant, but is made to look like a ‘fringe’ scientist or a complete quack. There are now hundreds of people with similar backgrounds blowing the whistle on what’s really happening on the moon, which is why these recent pictures from China are concerning. China has released hundreds of images.
At least the Guardian got it right. Martin Wiser, a scientist at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics and principal investigator on one of the instruments onboard the Chang’e, said: “We know the far side from orbital images and satellites, but we don’t know it from the surface. It’s unchartered territory and that makes it very exciting.”
Debunking Strange Occurrences On The Dark Side of The Moon
$21 trillion dollars were reported missing from the Pentagon. Michigan State professor and Economist, Mark Skidmore, and former assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts, found that this money was going towards black budget programs. Fitts has been quite outspoken about a secret space program, and so have hundreds of others like the former Canadian Defence Minister Paul Hellyer, stating that there are trillions of dollars going into these black budget programs.
When it comes to the moon, there is so much misinformation. You can learn more below:
For a long time, there has been misinformation and ridicule associated with UFO & Extraterrestrial phenomena, which in some cases may be separate issues. This was well illustrated by the very first Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, who was quoted by the New York Times in 1960 stating that, “behind the scenes, high ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs, but through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense.”
Roscoe is one of hundreds of former high-ranking government employees to blow the whistle on what’s really going on.
Below is another great testimony, which was from Victor Marchetti, a former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
We have indeed been contacted – perhaps even visited – by extraterrestrial beings, and the US government, in collusion with the other national powers of the Earth, is determined to keep this information from the general public. (Second Look, Volume 1, No 7, Washington, DC , May, 1979)
Furthermore, there are many credible sources that have alluded to the fact that NASA commonly airbrushes photos. Norman Bergrun is a great example of that, and he is only one of multiple sources.
The fact of the matter is that something is clearly going on, and for decades it’s quite clear that there is a group of powerful people who do not want this information to be disclosed. Below is a picture that represents what I’m talking about, a photo we’ve never seen that comes from Bergrun. According to Bergrun, the pictures NASA got back from voyager in 1980 from Saturn were so mind-altering that they locked them up. This is a picture of a luminous source that seems to be intelligently controlled based on its movements. Here, it’s photographed hovering just outside of Saturn’s outer ring. You can fit multiple Earth’s inside the rings, so this craft seems to be about the size of our planet. Bergrun was a scientist and engineer and part of NASA’s voyager program. He worked at NASA for decades (at Ames Research Centre), and also worked at Lockheed Martin where he managed the Polaris missile tests. Norman got frustrated later in life that the decision was made not to tell the public what they photographed. He gave an illuminating interview in 2010 on this subject, and has travelled all the way to Scotland to get his book “The Ringmakers of Saturn” published. You can read more about that story here.
Let this be an example of how we are only shown what they want us to see.
There is still a lot of misinformation spread about UFO and Extraterrestrial phenomena, particularly within the mainstream media. You can check out the article below that goes into what’s going on right now with mainstream UFO disclosure:
It’s important to recognize how easy it is for the elite and space agencies to control and alter the narrative. They choose what to disclose, and how to disclose it through mainstream media. The recent lunar probe landing by China on the far side of the moon is a perfect example of that, as it could be used to debunk possible artificially made structures on the far side of the moon.
What this means is that we have to do our own research and stay away from conventional sources that most of us use to find information. If we really want to know about something, and even offer an opinion about something, it’s best to look into it ourselves and utilize our critical thinking skills.
Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested By FBI on Charges Connected To Jeffrey Epstein
What Happened: Jeffrey Epstein’s confidant Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested this morning in New Hampshire according to FBI spokeswoman Adrienne Senatore. At this time, charges against Maxwell are sealed, and prosecutors have scheduled a midday press conference in New York to provide more details on the case.
Charges against Maxwell came almost a year after Epstein was arrested by FBI agents on July 6, 2019. Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself in a federal jail in August 2019, although many believe he was killed given he could name many high profile figures connected to his ring.
Why It Matters: Maxwell is heavily connected to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein who operated a sex/pedophile ring that tailored to high profile individuals, business people, entertainers and politicians.
Her arrest may be important in helping to bring down more people connected to the ring which include Hillary and Bill Clinton amongst other high profile names.
Humanity is in a process of ‘Breaking the Illusion’ we have come to accept about our reality. We have been living from a collective story that states we elect good people into government, and they act on our best interest. This categorically is not the case, and part of our collective awakening to creating solutions that can make our world thrive is waking up from this illusion we have chosen to accept.
People are beginning to learn en masse that high profile figures are involved in such acts like extreme occult rituals, sex trafficking and pedophilia, and they are beginning to wonder why. They are also beginning to question why we put our trust and support in people who operate in this manner.
We have interviewed a survivor of elite pedophile rings like the one Epstein and Maxwell ran. Her name is Anneke Lucas and you can watch her full testimony here on CETV.
You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well.
Read more about Epstein ad Maxwell here.
Environmentalist Censored For Shifting His Opinion On Climate Change
- The Facts:
Forbes.com deleted a new article from environmentalist Michael Shellenberger. His perspective on climate change shifted, and he decided to write about it. Forbes wasn't having it.
- Reflect On:
Why are we deciding to censor different perspectives as opposed to explore them? Is our emotional intelligence so undeveloped collectively that we cannot have civil conversations?
What Happened: Michael Shellenberger, a long time environmentalist who has been in the trenches helping to save the world’s last unprotected redwoods, co-created the predecessor to today’s Green New Deal and led an effort to keep nuclear power plants operating in order to prevent a spike of emissions, has shifted his perspective on climate change. Prior to today, he was holding the perspective that we must be alarmed about the fact that the world will end in a short amount of time if we don’t act to reduce carbon emissions immediately.
He shifted his opinion based on exploring emerging science on the subject. He then went on to write a book called Never Apocalypse, which seeks to help explore what we can do to better our environment from a grounded and accurate point of view, as opposed to alarmism.
He wrote an article on Forbes website titled “On Behalf of Environmentalists, I Apologize For the Climate Scare.” Two days later, Forbes decided to remove his article.
Why It Matters: The fact that Forbes removed an article that was grounded, calm, well written and explored new conversations illustrates the emerging culture of ‘censor anything that can get us in trouble’ or ‘censor anything that doesn’t agree with mainstream conjecture.”
We’ve come into a time where our collective lack of emotional intelligence is surfacing deeply for us to address. When we disagree on something, we struggle to explore things together. When a company says something they feel might get them in trouble, they run away in fear that the angry mob will come after them.
All that happened here was a man wrote an article that brought some new light to a conversation that has been very polarized and is causing people to react out of emotion instead of logic and the heart. Instead of listening and exploring, censorship ensues.
The Takeaway: I spoke at a high school here in Toronto last year. At the end of my talk, many students came up to me to talk, discuss ideas and share feedback. The vast majority of them explained to me that they were terrified that the world was going to end in just a few years. They felt they had no future because of the acts of generations prior who were causing CO2 levels to rise so high that the world would end.
I thought to myself, wow, an entire generation of kids being pushed into fear, anxiety and depression based on information that isn’t even accurate. This information was created by politicians and pushed out by media. Scientists categorically do not agree with the idea that the world is coming to an end as a result of CO2 emissions. Yet not enough people are telling people this, most of media is staying silent on other perspectives and censorship even shuts down opposing ideas.
What type of world will we create if we can’t discuss basic ideas? What type of world will we create when we choose to run, hide and censor as opposed to having important conversations? How can we stop identifying so deeply with positions, so that we can be more free to shift ideas when new information helps us understand things better?
I made a film last year called Regenerate: Beyond The CO2 Narrative. After 10 years of researching and investigating climate change, I came to many conclusions that I felt needed to be shared, yet were extremely rare in public discourse. One of the most important aspects of Regenerate was that we simply are looking at our environment from such a limited point of view that we can’t identify the real issues we face, and that our level of thinking, or consciousness, is completely disconnected from the solutions required to truly shift our relationship with earth. Thus, we are creating solutions that never truly address making the environment cleaner or better long term.
I encourage you to check out the film trailer below, and if you wish to watch the film, it’s available on our member platform called CETV. You can start a free 7 day trial to watch it if you like. We also discuss this story in more detail in episode 2 of The Takeway, an orignal show we have on CETV.
Soft Drink Companies Caught Using Big Tobacco’s Playbook To Lure Young Children
- The Facts:
Documents obtained by researchers clearly outline the unethical and immoral actions Tobacco companies used to 'hook' kids onto sugary drinks. They use the same tactics they did for smoking.
- Reflect On:
Why do and have our federal health regulatory agencies allow such products to be approved as safe for consumption when they are clearly linked to a variety of diseases, like cancer?
Many moves made by multiple big corporations are extremely unethical, immoral, and downright shocking. These corporations have completely compromised our federal health regulatory agencies, and it’s quite clear that they do not care about the health of the human race and will do anything when it comes to the success of the products they manufacture, including taking illegal and/or immoral actions.
One of the more recent examples comes from the tobacco industry. Companies within the industry used colors, flavors, and marketing techniques to lure and entice children as potential future smokers. They actually used and applied these same strategies to sweetened beverages starting as early as 1963, according to a study conducted by researchers at UC San Francisco.
As the Sugar Scientists point out:
The study, which draws from a cache of previously secret documents from the tobacco industry that is part of the UCSF Industry Documents Library tracked the acquisition and subsequent marketing campaigns of sweetened drink brands by two leading tobacco companies: R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris. It found that as tobacco was facing increased scrutiny from health authorities, its executives transferred the same products and tactics to peddle soft drinks. The study was published in the March 2019 issue of BMJ.
“Executives in the two largest U.S.-based tobacco companies had developed colors and flavors as additives for cigarettes and used them to build major children’s beverage product lines, including Hawaiian Punch, Kool-Aid, Tang and Capri Sun,” said senior author Laura Schmidt, PhD, MSW, MPH, of the UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Even after the tobacco companies sold these brands to food and beverage corporations, many of the product lines and marketing techniques designed to attract kids are still in use today.” (source)
The new papers, which are available in the UCSF Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library, a subset of the UCSF Industry Documents Library, reveal the close and tight knit relationships between the big tobacco and big food industries. In fact, in the 60s and 70s, these companies conducted taste tests with mothers and their children to evaluate sweetness, colors and flavors for Hawaiian Punch product line extensions. The children’s preferences were prioritized.
Kool-Aid Joins Marlboro
Meanwhile, tobacco competitor Philip Morris had acquired Kool-Aid, via General Foods, in 1985. The company flipped its marketing audience from families to children, created its “Kool-Aid Man” mascot, and launched collaborations with branded toys, including Barbie and Hot Wheels. It also developed a children’s Kool-Aid loyalty program described as “our version of the Marlboro Country Store,” a cigarette incentives program. (source)
“The Wacky Wild Kool-Aid style campaign had tremendous reach and impact,” said first author Kim Nguyen, ScD, MPH, who is also with the UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. “Lots of kids in the ’80s dreamed of getting swag from the Wacky Warehouse. What is really ‘wacky’ is that the Kool-Aid kid program was modeled after a tobacco marketing strategy designed to build allegiance with smokers.”
The tobacco giant also acquired Capri Sun and Tang, and used similar child-focused integrated marketing strategies to drive those sales.
“The industry claims that these tobacco-inspired marketing strategies are not actually targeting children and should be excluded from these industry-led agreements,” said Schmidt. “But the evidence cited in our research shows that these product lines and marketing techniques were specifically designed for and tested on children.” (source)
The UCSF Industry Documents Library was launched in 2002 as a digital portal for tobacco documents. Today, the library includes close to 15 million internal tobacco, drug, chemical and food industry documents used by scientists, policymakers, journalists and community members in their efforts to improve and protect the health of the public.
At the end of the day, it’s important to recognize that government health authorities and the corporations we buy our food from, among other things, really don’t care about us. This has become extremely evident, as they are responsible for the sharp rise in numerous diseases. It’s not uncommon to see parents buy their children products similar to the ones listed above, and that’s due to mass brainwashing and the fact that we’ve been made to feel that these products are actually safe. This is why awareness is so critical.
Have You Been Seeing Crows? What The Crow Symbolizes (More Than Just Death)
The other morning I ran out to my car to grab my purse when I heard the loudest “CAW” from...
“The Level of Stupidity Going On Here Is Amazing” – Nobel Laureate For Science On Covid-19 Lockdown
As many of you reading this may already be aware, a number of prominent scientists around the world have been...