Connect with us

News

Why Green Party Politicians Are Now Shills For The Global Elite’s Mass Immigration Policy

Avatar

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Green Party Leaders in France and Germany are in full support of mass migration into their countries, to the extent that national cultural identities will no longer exist.

  • Reflect On:

    Is it getting easier to see how the push for mass migration is a tactic of the Global Elite to get them closer to their goal of totalitarian global rule?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Gone are the days when Green parties were a group of people who simply wanted to protect the environment, and multiculturalism was motivated by a desire to demonstrate that people of different cultures could live together in harmony. Green party leaders were naive idealists who didn’t really have any cohesive political ideology. Those days are long gone.

advertisement - learn more

Today, many Green party leaders seem to have either been installed by the Global Elite or ‘persuaded’ to follow their political ideology. This is yet another clear example of how Big Money and Big Power infiltrate our institutions in any way they can to serve the Global Elite’s agenda.

--> Become A CE Member: The only thing that keeps our journalism going is YOU. CE members get access to exclusive benefits and support our shared mission.. Click here to learn more!

Remember how American Green party leader Jill Stein seemed to come out of nowhere to make a big fuss about having a recount in the 2016 election? She was able to somehow raise $7 million for the cause that ultimately didn’t come into fruition. But the fact that she would make such an effort to have Deep State candidate Hillary Clinton supplant Donald Trump as President of the United States really says it all.

The Global Elite’s Mass Immigration Strategy

A particular strategy on the part of the Global Elite has recently surfaced in the minds of those paying attention, and we are slowly realizing how it has long been hidden behind the guise of ‘mutual acceptance and respect between cultures’. Carefully crafted to label any opposition as ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic,’ this strategy of mass immigration is part of an effort to destabilize nations not only by destroying the cultural fabric and identity of each nation, but also by inciting criminal activity and racial tensions.

This push is exemplified by the United Nation’s ‘Global Migration Pact,’ which in and of itself gives more power to a central global authority and less power to nations. The end goal? The erosion of the sovereignty and security of nations and the creation of a situation in which global rulership, with its false promise of bringing peace and prosperity, actually becomes something that citizens of beleaguered nations might be convinced to go along with.

Refugee migration is an important prong of this strategy. First, the Global Elite destabilizes sovereign countries like Syria, bringing Deep State-created and -funded ‘terrorist groups’ (read: well-paid mercenaries) to cause havoc and suffering. Then, they orchestrate a highly organized mass migration of refugees to Europe, making these frightened people think they have no other choice but to leave their home amid false promises of a better life. Then, they pit all of us against each other. Those who are simply thinking and acting out of compassion for these displaced populations end up fighting against those who see that while many refugees are completely innocent, there is evil intent behind the overall plan.

advertisement - learn more

If world leaders really cared about these people, would they not have pooled their military resources and defeated all vestiges of organized terrorism in Syria so that all of those refugees would be safe to stay home? Does anyone doubt that if the political will was there, this problem could have been handled in a matter of days? Clearly, the world has been deceived about the true nature of the refugee crisis.

People of good conscience would want to do everything they could for those innocent people who have been displaced from their home country. But in order to address the matter properly, countries cannot allow themselves to completely open their borders and try to handle demands they have no resources for. Of course many of the heads of state have no problem trying to look like the hero by welcoming masses of people into the country at the expense of its own citizens, but currently their motive is not compassion but their adherence to the Global Elite’s ‘open borders’ agenda.

In my article ‘Dalai Lama Sparks Outrage With Remarks On Refugee Crisis: But Is He Right?‘, I make the argument that while the elimination of borders and the bringing together of citizens of all nations as ‘one’ is the ultimate destination of the human race, the efforts being made to create culturally discordant nations are not leading us there. The mass migration agenda is designed to bring about the totalitarian enslavement of the human race, run by a Global Elite as portrayed in many dystopian movies and Orwellian novels.

France’s Yves Cochet

To listen to French Green party founder and leader Yves Cochet is to witness a man whose outright betrayal of his own culture is striking. It leads one to really ponder what kinds of benefits he is receiving for holding the position that he does. I’ll let him say it in his own words, taken from this article:

I suggest reversing our policy that encourages births, by inverting the logic of benefits payments for families. The more children you have, the fewer benefits you receive to the point of disappearing entirely after the third birth!

“When we accept being ‘Neo-Malthusians,’ we are quickly accused of racism and elitism. For that reason therefore, I make it clear that I am not targeting the poorest countries, which produce more children than others. On the contrary. The rich countries, like France, are the first that need to decrease demographically. They are the ones with the most polluting lifestyles. Most of all, limiting our births would allow us to better receive the Muslim migrants who are knocking at our doors.

While it is understood that Green Party politicians sometimes espouse the view that having children is the single biggest way a human being can have a negative impact on the environment, Cochet seems to be contradicting himself on his main point by not applying his philosophy on all people for fear of being accused of racism and elitism. And so where this philosophy may contain a germ of sense when broadly applied to humanity, the way in which Cochet is now being selective with it shows that he is choosing to fall in line with an agenda, one that could have dire consequences on our future.

Essentially, Cochet is selling out on his own people and is clearly advocating for the erosion and eventual disappearance of the French culture! If these statements are not one of a person who has fully aligned himself with the Global Elite and has probably been promised a junior role within the future ruling class, I don’t know what they are. The Global Elite is using the current phenomena of higher birth rates in the lesser developed countries, in concert with moving these people within the borders of more prosperous nations, to gain the support of those very people for their globalist agenda.

Germany’s Stefanie von Berg

In lock-step with Cochet’s enthusiastic espousal of the breakdown of a nation’s predominant culture, Germany’s Stefanie von Berg addressed the German parliament (see video below) in which she predicts that in 20 to 30 years, the will be no German majorities in Germany’s cities.

We will live in a city that thrives on having many different ethnicities, that we have many people and we live in a supercultural society. This is what we will have in the future, and I want to make it very clear, especially towards those right-wingers: this is a good thing!

In their arguments in favor of a country that houses people from all different cultures but has lost the will for cultural assimilation, these Green party politicians seemed to have missed one obvious fact: It’s not working. This is clearly evident in Europe, and just a little bit of rational thought and observation would be able to tell you why.

The Shortcomings Of Multiculturalism

I live in Toronto, which is considered to be one of the most successful multicultural cities in the world. By and large, the people here as well as visitors to this city love this and the diversity it introduces to them. But the main reason for its success is that it became multicultural organically, with the arrival of immigrants occurring over time. Being the business center of Canada, more often than not immigrants were attracted to Toronto because they wanted to take advantage of the work and career opportunities.

When immigration policies actually go out of their way to accommodate different cultures to speak only their native language, live in their own enclaves, and abide by laws that differ significantly from those followed by the rest of the nation, this creates suspicions of a hidden agenda. Having a city that is not united by language, customs, or codes of ethics makes it difficult for the community as a whole to thrive. While differences are often desirable and are to be respected, and multiculturalism is a beautiful thing, a certain amount of collective cohesion is required for a country to continue to be what made it strong and sovereign to begin with. So as we see the efforts to strip any mandate for assimilation from national immigration policies, we cannot help but think that these efforts are clear attempts to weaken the sovereignty of nations to pave the way for global dictatorship.

The Takeaway

I believe all people have equal worth, that no one culture is better than another, and that one of our greatest goals should be for all of our cultures to live together on this planet harmoniously with mutual respect for our differences. As such, I am immune to any accusations of racism or xenophobia and I endeavor to speak my mind and tell things the way I see them. I invite all of you in the Awakening Community to speak boldly and forthrightly about matters of conscience, regardless of whether or not it’s ‘politically correct.’ These are the discussions of Conscious Media, which doesn’t put the blame on a given group or position, but rather attempts to shine a light on what is really going on underneath the veils of deception. Only by doing this collectively will the human race be able to navigate towards our chosen and desired destination.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Fact Checkers & Big Tech Censorship Are Tearing Apart Society

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 1 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Journalist Laurie Clarke published an article in the British Medical Journal examining hundreds of millions of pieces of content that Facebook has removed in an attempt to stop ‘covid misinformation.’ As a result of censorship, we are seeing a breakdown of important dialogue. Here is our deeper written analysis of her piece.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

The Quantum Eraser Experiment: What Happens In The Present Can Change The Past

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 7 minute read
Image: Shutterstock

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    At the quantum scale, what we do in the present can impact what happens in the past. This is shown through what's known as the quantum delayed choice choice, or quantum eraser experiment.

  • Reflect On:

    Why are factors associated with consciousness directly intertwined with physical material matter at the quantum scale? What does this mean when it comes to our physical material world in relation to our thoughts, perceptions, feelings and emotions?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

One of the founding fathers of quantum theory, Max Planck, who is often credited with originating quantum theory – a feat that won him the Physics Nobel Prize in 1918 – once stated: “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as exiting, postulates consciousness.”

Fast forward to today and there are a number of experiments in multiple fields showing that Planck was right. Consciousness is fundamental and it is directly intertwined with what we call physical material matter. You cannot explain consciousness in terms of the existing fundamentals like space, time, mass, and charge. As a result, the logical thing to do is postulate whether consciousness itself is something fundamental to the existence of reality.

A classic experiment used to examine the role of consciousness and its relationship to matter is the quantum double slit experiment. In this experiment, tiny bits of matter (photons, electrons, or any atomic-sized object) are shot toward a screen that has two slits in it. When there is no measuring device placed at the screen, the tiny bits of matter act as a “wave” and creates an “interference” pattern on the other side where a wall is placed to catch the pattern. Because there was no measuring or observation device used to see what slit the matter went through, we cannot know what path it took. When the pattern on the wall is examined to see what path it took, it represents a wave of possibilities, meaning the matter (particle) went through both slits, and one slit, and interfered with itself, which should be physically impossible. Welcome to the wacky world of quantum physics – anything and everything is possible.

The kicker is, when an observation device is set up to observe what slit the particles go through, the particle then only goes through one, thus collapsing the wave pattern and forming a pattern that is representative of the particle only going through one slit. In other words, the behaviour of the matter changes when we decide to measure  or observe it, the particles act as they are aware they are being watched. 50 percent of the time the particle will go through one slit, and the other 50 percent of the time it will go through the other and form a two slit pattern, just as if they were balls lobbed through one slit or the other.

Observations not only disturb what has to be measured, they produce it…We compel (the electron) to assume a definite position…We ourselves produce the results of the measurement. (M. Mermin, Boojums All the Way Through: Communicating Science ina Prosaic Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990, referenced by Dr. Dean Radin, From A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays explaining how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality

If this isn’t already mind-altering enough for you, one physicist, John Archibald Wheeler, pondered what would happen if we don’t interfere with the photons on their way through the slits? What would happen if we didn’t set up a measuring device to observe what slit the matter went through, and instead, what if behind the back wall there were detectors? One detector is focused on each slit, and just before the particle lands on the screen after it has passed through the slit device, the detectors are pulled away. When no one could detect which slit the photon had gone through, there was a wave pattern, but when the detectors were in place, there was no wave pattern. Similar to observing the particles before they went through the slit. No observation produced an interference pattern, and observation formed a one line, one slit pattern.

If they collapse to a state of particles from a wave at the moment of detection, after they have gone past the slit device, this means that even though they went through the slit unobserved and should produce a wave (interference) pattern, the very act of observing, still, instantly transforms them into particles and collapses the wave function.

This begs the question, how could these detectors interfere with something that had already happened? It would mean that what happened in the present changed the past. The very act of detecting the particles after they go through the slit determines how they went through the slit, either as a wave or as particles. How is this possible?

Like the quantum double slit experiment, the delayed choice/quantum eraser has been demonstrated and repeated multiple times. For example, physicists at the Australian National University (ANU) have conducted John Wheeler’s delayed-choice thought experiment, and the findings were recently published in the journal Nature Physics.

In 2007 (Science 315, 966, 2007), scientists in France shot photons into an apparatus and showed that their actions could retroactively change something that had already happened.

“If we attempt to attribute an objective meaning to the quantum state of a single system, curious paradoxes appear: quantum effects mimic not only instantaneous action-at-a-distance, but also, as seen here, influence of future actions on past events, even after these events have been irrevocably recorded.” (source)

To make the experiment easier to understand, Wheeler used a cosmic scale explanation. Imagine a star emitting a photon billions of years ago, heading in the direction of planet Earth. In between, there is a galaxy. As a result of what’s known as “gravitational lensing,” the light will have to bend around the galaxy in order to reach Earth, so it has to take one of two paths, going left or going right. Billions of years later, if one decides to set up an apparatus to “catch” the photon, the resulting pattern would be an interference pattern, as explained above in the double slit experiment. This demonstrates that the photon took one way, and it took the other way. A “wave” of possibilities, but the way it took has not been defined.

One could also choose to “peek” at the incoming photon, setting up a telescope on each side of the galaxy to determine which side the photon passed to reach Earth. The very act of measuring or “watching” which way the photon comes in means it can only come in from one side. The pattern will no longer be an interference pattern representing multiple possibilities, but a single clump pattern showing “one” way.

What does this mean? It means how we choose to measure “now” affects what direction the photon took billions of years ago. Our choice in the present moment affected what had already happened in the past.

Below is a great video of Wheeler explaining.

My mind is blown just writing this article, I can’t stop thinking about it and what it could possibly mean, and how factors associated with consciousness are, in more ways than one, intertwined with what we perceive to be our physical reality. I recently published an article regarding consciousness and how it might be fundamental to the creation of our physical material world. You can read that here if interested.

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” ― Nikola Tesla

Why does all of this matter? Because it’s one of multiple experiments showing a strong connection between consciousness and physical matter. What does this mean at the classic physics scale? What does it mean with regards to the way we think, feel, perceive? What does it mean when we are talking about solutions to problems we are facing on our planet? If human consciousness could be so fundamental with regards to the ‘creation of our reality’, why aren’t we talking about it more? What impact would changing the way we look at our world have on the human experience? What would happen if we started to see things in a different light?

We tend to believe in our culture that we are beings where everything in our world is happening to us, as opposed to us being intimately connected to everything in our world. How might that knowing change the nature of our choices?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

Exopolitics

Study Finds That Humans Would Be Quite “Upbeat” About The Discovery of Extraterrestrial Life

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

3 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

As the possibilities of a non-human intellect being present on Earth increase on a daily basis, one critical question must be addressed: How will we deal with it if we make contact? Will we be terrified if we feel threatened? Will we accept it? Will we be able to comprehend it? Or will we dismiss it as just another item to cope with in our increasingly fast-paced world?

Researchers from Arizona State University performed a study to try to find out the answer, and the article is titled “How Will We React to the Discovery of Extraterrestrial Life?”

“If we came face to face with life outside of Earth, we would actually be pretty upbeat about it,” said Arizona State University Assistant Professor of Psychology Michael Varnum.

The pilot study’s articles focused on the 1996 discovery of possibly fossilised extraterrestrial Martian microbes, the 2015 discovery of periodic dimming around Tabby’s Star, thought to indicate the presence of an artificially constructed “Dyson sphere,” and the 2017 discovery of Earth-like exoplanets in a star’s habitable zone.

The pilot study discovered that the language used to depict these events elicited much more positive than negative feelings.

In a second study, the researchers invited over 500 people to write about their potential reactions to the discovery of alien microbial life, as well as humanity’s possible reaction. When considering their individual sentiments as well as those of mankind as a whole, participants’ replies revealed substantially more positive than negative emotions.

“I’d be a little excited about the news,” one participant remarked. “Even if it existed in a rudimentary form, it would be fascinating.”

The scientists discovered evidence of considerably happier than negative emotions in responses to the alleged finding of alien life, and this impact was larger in response to reading about extraterrestrial life than in response to human-made synthetic life.

“This discovery demonstrates that other planets can support life,” one participant stated. “It’s an intriguing and fascinating discovery that might be only the beginning.”

According to Varnum, “taken together, this implies that if we find out we’re not alone, we’ll take the news rather well”

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!