Connect with us

General

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Completely Ignores Serious 5G Health Hazards

Avatar

Published

on

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Article update with more information regarding the health concerns: Study: Governments Should Be Testing 5G & Proving It’s Safe Before Exposing Humanity To It

advertisement - learn more

Last Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated that his government is relying on “national security experts” as it “weighs any potential security concerns associated with 5G wireless technology.” Canada is currently contemplating on whether or not to allow Huawei Technologies Co. access to it’s next-generation wireless network. This firm has developed 5G technology as a fifth-generation mobile network that could be 100 times faster than what already exists today. Australia and New Zealand have already banned Huawei from their grids, and other countries like the United Kingdom and Germany are being pressured to follow suit over supposed security concerns that the technology could be used and exploited by foreign countries.

--> Become A CE Member: The only thing that keeps our journalism going is YOU. CE members get access to exclusive benefits and support our shared mission.. Click here to learn more!

According to the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC):

U.S. wireless providers are trumpeting the virtues of their soon-to-be-unveiled 5G networks, but in Canada, the Big Three telecoms are sitting back and staying mum. Many experts believe it’ll take years for a full rollout of the next-generation wireless technology, which promises to deliver blistering fast download speeds — some say up to 200 times faster than today’s LTE networks — and negligible lag times that will empower driverless car technology, remote-controlled surgeries and other yet-to-be-invented ideas. U.S. telecom competitors are battling for the bragging rights of hitting the market first — even though there’s still no indication that 5G-compatible smartphones will be available before 2019.

We are currently in the rollout, and 5G technology is already here. Many North Americans are already using 5G technology for their internet services inside of their homes, yet nobody seems to be concerned or even knows about the health hazards associated with this type of technology or wireless technology in general.

This is largely because our access to information is controlled by mainstream media, as mainstream media is often the only source of information people use to stay up to date on what’s really going on. So, any issues that aren’t addressed there (and there are many) go unnoticed by and hidden from the collective. The issue is that mainstream media networks are owned by corporations, which is evident given all of the declassified documentation showing this as well as the number of award-winning mainstream media journalists who, in the past several years, have quit their jobs in order to create awareness about mainstream media’s connection to governments, corporations and intelligence agencies. You can read more about that and see the latest example here.

advertisement - learn more

Here is another article that may interest you that goes into mainstream media’s connection to intelligence agencies and academia.

So much information about what is happening on our planet is completely omitted by mainstream media as well as academia, resulting in a population of misinformed professionals and citizenry. We cannot continue to rely on academia nor mainstream media as our only sources of information, and doing so will only further mislead the collective and continue to contribute to the destruction of our health and the planet.

I came across Trudeau’s address regarding 5G technology and their supposed security concerns while I was in the change room of a gym. It was on a T.V. and multiple people were watching the broadcast.

Having worked in this field for a long time, and having observed the amount of shares and site hits that articles regarding 5G technology and wireless radiation in general receive, I feel that many people are ‘awake.’ I thought this would be the case simply given the solidity of the science, it’s unquestionable, but unfortunately, a lot of important science is not really emphasized when it should be. It seems to be completely ignored by mainstream media and represents an area within mainstream academia that needs more attention. 

I continued to watch the broadcast only to be disappointed that nobody was asking Trudeau about the health concerns related to 5G technology, and why it’s presumed safe and has not gone through any safety testing. This is strange since there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications that provide great cause for concern.

I proceeded to ask fellow onlookers in the room if they were aware of the health concerns over 5G and one of them responded in a sarcastic tone, saying “what, are tumors going to start growing out of our ears?” Another responded by stating that natural sources of electromagnetic radiation have always been present in our environment and it’s not a concern. My heart instantly dropped as I was reminded of just how misinformed people can be and how something that’s never addressed or brought up on television is usually greeted with disbelief.

There seems to be a common thought that, if it’s important, our federal regulatory agencies would not allow its approval. This is incorrect.

I was even more concerned that the Prime Minister seems to be citing security issues and no health issues at all.

‘National Security’ has been present as long as politics has. It’s a term used to justify and push the populace to accept harsher security measures, stripping us of our rights and freedoms for more ‘protection.’ Not to mention it’s always been used as an excuse to classify boat loads of information to protect corporate interests. Mass surveillance programs are a great example, which were once considered a ‘conspiracy theory’ prior to the Snowden leaks. We saw this with the ‘war on terror,’ one that’s been fabricated as evident by false-flag terrorist attacks in order to justify the infiltration of other  countries as well as mass surveillance programs here at home that infringe on our rights. William Binney, another former high ranking intelligence official with the National Security Agency stated that these programs are not used to protect us, but are for the purpose of “total population control.”

Perhaps 5G and the security issues brought up are no different? We are experiencing a massive wave of Orwellian-type censorship of information, particularly when it comes to the internet. Elitist groups are determining what is ‘real’ and what is ‘fake’ instead of letting the people decide for themselves. For example, the news browser extension NewsGuard promises to help readers pick out fake news. However, NewsGuard is funded and run by individuals tied to the CFR, Atlantic Council and other prominent elite figures. You can read more about that here. It’s the latest example of many, but others include the recent deletion of over 1000 alternative media pages’ social platforms including Alex Jones and The Free Thought Project.

Net Neutrality falls under this same category. Heightened security concerns could impose even more restrictions and censorship on the internet than there already are. A tool of the global elite has always been to manufacture the problem so they can propose the solution, and I believe that’s exactly what’s happening here. They’re creating a false narrative surrounding ‘fake news’ and ‘national security’ in order to justify further control over the population. 

Now Let’s Get To Those Health Concerns

As I mentioned earlier, there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications raising multiple health concerns. If you want to access these, the Environmental Health Trust is an excellent place to start.

Did you know that multiple countries around the world have completely banned wireless technology inside of schools and nursery homes due to health concerns? Take France for example. They passed a law in 2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. The law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when it’s not in use. A wired connection, if possible, is preferred. This could also be a great solution for your home, and a wired connection is much faster than a wireless one.

It’s not just a concern for children. The French National Library along with several other libraries and universities have completely removed all Wi-Fi networks, and it’s also banned in many municipal buildings.

Other countries with similar restrictions include: Belgium, Spain, Israel, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, India, Finland, Cyprus and more.

The list goes on, and all of them have varying levels and degrees of limitations and bans.

For example, Namibia’s atomic energy review clearly states that current so-called “safety” standards don’t protect citizens from long-term health effects, as the guidelines governing their use do not guarantee adequate protection against the effects of long-term exposure.

So why have we not imposed similar restrictions in North America yet?

This industry is one of many, along with big pharma and big food, that’s plagued by large corporations who completely control our federal regulatory agencies. I recently wrote about the big pharma connection to the government, and presented a video from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on how big pharma completely owns congress. You can check that out here.

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician and professor recently gave her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation at Michigan State’s 5G small cell tower hearing.

Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects… 5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.

You can watch that full testimony here.

In fact, new research shows how the frequencies used in crowd control weapons, ones that physically impact our biology, form the basis of the new 5G network. You can read more about that here.

“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers” – Dr. Devra Lee Davis,  founding director of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health Trust

In 2015, Dr. Martin Blank led a scientist appeal to the United Nations and the World Health Organization, calling for greater attention to the health risks of EMFs. Currently, there are 240 scientists from 41 nations with published peer-reviewed EMF papers as signatories to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, unified in the opinion that the body of research on EMF bioeffects is not only compelling, but urgent. He has stated:

Putting it bluntly they (EMFs) are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely. (source)

Futhermore, Dr. Lee (quoted above) has put together what’s known as the Environmental Health Trust.  There you can find all of the science and more relating to this topic. If you do your research, you will see how our regulatory agencies and these corporations completely bypass this science and simply presume that these technologies are safe.

We see the same thing with our food, pesticides (glyphosate being one of the most popular examples), and more. Our federal regulatory agencies have been completely corrupted and taken over by corporations.

The Takeaway

Don’t be completely alarmed. There are various things you can do to mitigate these effects. At home, you could have a wired connection. You could disconnect your router and other appliances that give off some type of electromagnetic radiation when they are not in use and/or before bed. You could purchase electromagnetic protective clothing and bedding, and you could live a healthy lifestyle with a clean diet and lots of exercise. At the end of the day, it’s nothing to fear, but rather something to be aware of. Don’t put your laptop on your lap, turn off your cell phone when not in use, and never have your cell phone touching your ear. Don’t keep it in your pocket! I am a big believer in the mind-body connection, and if that information resonates with you, it can also be put to good use to mitigate the harmful effects of wireless technology. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Dr Byram Bridle Speaks For 100 Colleagues Afraid To Share Science About COVID Vaccine Concerns

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 2 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Dr Byram Bridle and two other physicians spoke at a news conference on Parliament Hill about their experience being censored or harassed as a result of sharing their medical opinions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Reflect On:

    Do we as citizens truly want our scientists and physicians to be silenced and censored?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Why are scientists and experts in this field scared to share concerning science regarding COVID vaccines? Just ask Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph who recently released a detailed, in-depth report regarding safety concerns about the COVID vaccines. The report was released to act as a guide for parents when it comes to deciding whether or not their child should be vaccinated against COVID-19. Bridle published the paper on behalf of one hundred other scientists and doctors who part of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, but who are afraid to ‘come out’ publicly and share their concerns.

Bridle has stated about the Alliance,

In fact the reason that we (Canadian COVID Care Alliance) exist is sad. We exist because we’re like minded in the sense that we all want to be able to speak openly and freely about the scientist and medicine underpinning COVID-19, and we don’t feel safe to do it  anywhere else other than within our own private group, where we feel safe.

Below is our detailed report on the news conference held on Parliament Hill on June 17th, 2021. It was organized by Canadian MP Derek Sloan who has received hundreds of concerned communications from Canadian citizens about the censorship of scientists. Bridle and two other physicians spoke at the conference.

A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”

The more important questions to ask are: who is deciding what’s misleading? Who decides what’s false?

Some of the most renowned scientists and expert in this field have been subjected to this “fact-checking,” and they’ve been outspoken about how much of this fact-checking is flat out censorship. You decide.

To note: HealthFeedback.org, a fact checker, has attempted to refute some of Bridle’s claims. You can read more about them here.

 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

Study Finds Many Uninfected Adults Still Have Strong Pre-Existing Antibody Protection Against COVID

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 5 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    A study published in March 2021 suggests that the majority of healthy adults in British Columbia, Canada, have immunity from COVID-19 despite the fact that some of them have never been infected with it.

  • Reflect On:

    Why has the power of naturally acquired immunity not been recognized and focused on more deeply? Why is the only focus on vaccination?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A study published in March 2021 suggested that  the majority of healthy Adults in British Columbia have evidence of pre-existing or naturally acquired immunity to COVID-19.  They found this to be the case even in individuals who haven’t been infected, and could be explained by the fact that coronaviruses that already circle the globe, prior to COVID-19, may provide protection from the novel virus.  They explain,

There are 4 circulating coronaviruses predating COVID-19 that cause up to 30% of seasonal upper respiratory tract infections (8). The spike proteins of β-coronaviruses HKU1 and OC43 exhibit approximately 40% sequence similarity, whereas the α-coronaviruses NL63 and 229E exhibit approximately 30% structural similarity with SARS-CoV-2 (9). The common occurrence of circulating coronaviruses year after year and their structural similarity with SARS-CoV-2 raises the possibility that the former may stimulate cross-reactive responses toward SARS-CoV-2 and that this heterotopic immunity may impact clinical susceptibility to COVID-19 and/or modulate responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (10, 11)….In conclusion, this study reveals common preexisting, broadly reactive SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in uninfected adults. These findings warrant larger studies to understand how these antibodies affect the severity of COVID-19, as well as the quality and longevity of responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

We are living in a world where anything “natural” seems to be shunned by a large portion of the medical community, and defined as “pseudoscientific”, when in fact, research suggests the opposite.

Natural immunity is quite robust. Dr. Suneel Dhang, an internal medical physician in the United States explains,

I’m not aware of any vaccine out there which will ever give you more immunity than if you’re naturally recovered from the illness itself…If you’ve naturally recovered from it, my understanding as a doctor level scientist is that those antibodies will always be better than a vaccine, and if you know any differently, please let me know.

A number of studies have now been published demonstrating that infection from COVID will provide a person with long lasting antibodies. Several studies have demonstrated that individuals with prior infection not only have these antibodies, but that they also developed robust levels of B cells and T cells (necessary for fighting off the virus) and these cells may persist in the body for a very long time. How long? It could be decades, or even a lifetime.

Individuals with infection from SARS, for example, still have a robust level of antibodies nearly two decades later. Research has also found that even a mild COVID infection can provide very strong protection that could last a lifetime.

Last fall there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived. But that’s a misrepresentation of the data. It’s normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, but they don’t go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives. That’s strong evidence for long-lasting immunity. –  Ali Ellebedy, PhD, associate professor of pathology & immunology, of medicine and micro-biology. (source)

This science and research completely opposes what we were hearing early on in the pandemic, that prior infection, and infection from other coronaviruses may only provide protection for a few months or even a couple of years. It turns out that it’s probably a lot longer.

When infected with SARS-CoV-2, most people clear this virus from their body by mounting a robust, long-lasting immune response that targets multiple components of the virus1. These people will be protected from re-infection with the same variant of SARS-CoV-2 and, due to the breadth of a natural immune response, will also likely have some degree of protection against emerging new variants of SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, most people who have naturally acquired immunity should not be at risk of developing severe disease. – Dr. Byram Bridle, Viral Immunologist, University of Guelph. (source)

How does this compare to vaccine induced immunity? We don’t know as there is not enough data to say yet.

Dr. Ozlem Tureci, co-founder and CMO of BioNTech, the company that developed a COVID vaccine with Pfizer told CNBC that people will likely need a third shot of its two-dose COVID-19 vaccine. She also believes people will need one every year. Judging by this belief, vaccine induced immunity will continually wane and those who choose to go the vaccine route may have to continue with inoculations.

The scientific consensus of the number of people infected around the world is well over what testing has claimed. Currently, we’re nearly at 200,000,000 cases, but that number is most likely well over a billion globally. This is why the survival rate for healthy people under the age of 60 is nearly one hundred percent.

These infection numbers are important because it represents a globe closing in on herd immunity. My question is, what effect does the vaccine have on those who have already had an infection? What does this do to natural protection one gets from infection?

Another important question to ask is, why has the topic of naturally acquired immunity been given absolutely zero attention within the mainstream? Why are they pushing the idea that we can’t go back to completely normal until every single person has had a vaccine if that doesn’t match what the science is saying?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

Pfizer & Moderna Fail To Respond To British Medical Journal About COVID Vaccine Safety Concerns

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 5 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal Dr. Peter Doshi explains that both Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to questions about why bio-distribution studies were not conducted prior to the rollout of their COVID vaccines.

  • Reflect On:

    Are these vaccines actually safe and effective? Why are so many people within the mainstream completely unaware of certain safety concerns and issues being raised with COVID vaccines?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An article published in the British Medical Journal by Dr. Peter Doshi titled “Covid-19 Vaccines: In The Rush for Regulatory Approval, Do We Need More Data?” raises concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and one of them is the bio-distribution of the vaccine.  This refers to the examination and study of where the vaccine and its ingredients go once injected into the body. Having sped up the approval process of these vaccines, it has been claimed that no compromises in the process of examining their safety were made. But the fact that no study for tracking the distribution of the vaccine within the human body was conducted for any of the authorized vaccines, we cannot say this is true.

Dr. Doshi points out that such bio-distribution studies are a standard practice of drug safety testing but “are usually not required for vaccines.” This in itself is concerning. Research regarding the bio-distribution of aluminum containing vaccines, for example, have raised concerns about injected aluminum crossing the blood brain barrier and being distributed throughout the body where it can be detected years after injection. This is important, because vaccines are a different method of delivery than say, ingested aluminum, which the body does a great job of getting rid of through digestion.

Bio-distribution studies weren’t performed for COVID vaccines because data from past studies performed with related, and “mostly unapproved compounds that use the same platform technology” were used to bypass them.

Dr. Doshi points out that,

“Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to The BMJ’s questions regarding why no biodistribution studies were conducted on their novel mRNA products, and none of the companies, nor the FDA, would say whether new biodistribution studies will be required prior to licensure.”

In his article, Dr. Doshi also references a report that Pfizer provided to the Japanese government. In the report there is a table containing lipid nanoparticle bio-distribution data.

This table shows where their surrogate “vaccine” (i.e. represented in the laboratory test by little bubbles of surrogate fat containing an analytical detection marker) ended up in the body of immunized rats, used in the laboratory as surrogates for humans…I would like to highlight some observations. First…a lot of the surrogate vaccine dose remained at the injection site, as one would expect. Remarkably, however, most of the vaccine dose had gone elsewhere….50-75% of the vaccine dose failed to remain at the site of injection. The big question is, where did it go? Looking at the other tissues shows some of the paces it went and accumulated…The surrogate vaccine was circulating in the blood. There is also evidence that a substantial amount of the vaccine went to places like the spleen, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands, and bone marrow. The vaccine went to other places as well, such as testes, lungs, intestines, kidneys, thyroid glands, pituitary gland, uterus, etc. The surrogate vaccine tested in a laboratory setting was widely distributed throughout the laboratory animal’s bodies. – Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Viral Immunologist, University of Guelph.

The above quote comes from a detailed report Bridle recently released for COVID-19: “A Vaccine Guide For Parents.” One of his main concerns is that the spike protein that our cells manufacture after injection enter into the bloodstream, and that the spike protein itself isn’t harmless. He goes into a detailed explanation in the report cited above.

According to him,

This information is incredibly important because recent data have come to light that the spike protein is “biologically active.” This means that the spike protein is not just an antigen that is recognized the immune system as being foreign. It means that the spike protein, itself, can interact with receptors throughout the body, called ACE2 receptors, potentially causing undesirable effects such as damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, blood clots, bleeding, and neurological effects.

Again, the report is quite detailed and you can access it here if you’re interested. Bridle is not the only one raising these concerns. He, like many other professionals out there, have been subjected to “fact checking” via Facebook third party fact checkers. Here’s a response from PolitiFact regarding Bridle’s claims and the science he points to.

PolitiFact claims that there is no evidence that the spike protein is ‘a toxin.’ They cite opinions from the CDC and other researchers claiming that no evidence has yet emerged stating the spike protein is dangerous. But they are not actually addressing the cited science Bridle is pointing to, they are merely saying everything he is saying is wrong.

This type of baseless ‘fact checking’ has been a problem during the entire pandemic. A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”

The article explains why fact-checking scientists has been nothing short of censorship of both evidence and educated opinion. This has happened numerous times throughout the pandemic with multiple renowned scientists. I recently wrote about a couple of examples here, and here, if you’d like to dig deeper.

It’s telling when science, evidence and opinions of experts are censored and subjected to ridicule throughout a global event like this. One has to ask: what is the motivation? Does a clear headed society seek to censor?

Any narrative that questions what we are receiving from government, health authorities, and mainstream media have been completely unacknowledged.  Effectively dividing the public on important issues.

Once again, this begs the question, why? You would think it a time like this discussion and evidence would be shared openly and transparently, instead, we’ve seen the exact opposite.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!