Connect with us

Alternative News

Was “Voter ID” For 2020 Trump’s Plan All Along?

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Donald Trump is now calling for Voter ID. Was the decision not to contest voter fraud in 2018 part of the plan to bring about Voter ID for 2020 and beyond?

  • Reflect On:

    Can we see that, while some political initiatives like Voter ID seem to make more sense than others, that political initiatives themselves are still part of a dying system and will not ultimately bring about our salvation?

Since I started following American politics decades ago, I always identified with the Democratic party, the party I associated with compassion, diversity, social and personal freedom, economic equity, and other values I held. I celebrated the victories of Bill Clinton and especially Barack Obama, who I thought was the true savior for America, and rued the election of George W. Bush. I saw the Democratic party as the underdog, the people’s party, fighting against a Republican party that supported and was supported by the rich and powerful.

advertisement - learn more

And yet, even in the early days, there was one contention made consistently by the Democratic party that didn’t make sense to me. They seemed to be against voters having to furnish proper identification in order to vote in federal elections. The reasoning, in general terms, was that this would ‘suppress’ the minority vote; the only logic I can come up with for that is to argue that those who were visible minorities might be less likely to have a driver’s license, and furthermore would somehow have less time, capability, or motivation to register for a government id to certify their citizenship.

But this argument never made sense to me. I never understood how people who were visible minorities would be any less likely to take the time and effort to get an identification card that certifies that they are citizens. In fact, if there was any fears that they would be discriminated against in the voting process, one would expect that they would be more motivated to have wallet-ready certification of their legal right to vote.

Ah, but I was a little naive then. Especially about politics.

Non-Citizens Cannot Vote In Federal Elections

It is important to note that while landed immigrants in the U.S. with a green card or other such authorization do have some limited rights to vote in local elections, they do not have the right to vote in a federal election until they have gained full citizenship. Working with the assumption that landed immigrants would tend to have more affinity towards the Democratic party than the Republican party, it is understandable why the two parties never seem to be able to come to a consensus on immigration reform or certain aspects of election reform that impacts the participation of landed immigrants in the electoral process.

Of course, everything we have said here about landed immigrants applies even more drastically to immigrants who have entered the U.S. illegally. The Democratic party, it should be plain for all to see, is doing everything it can to prevent any process that might distinguish between citizens, legally landed immigrants, and illegal immigrants. This includes blocking any questions about citizenship in the federal census. It is not because the Democratic party ‘cares’ more about immigrants. Neither party as an entity ‘cares’ about anything except its own survival and accumulation of power. It is simply because the Democratic party believes that muddling the distinctions between who is allowed and who is not allowed to vote–and hence making it possible for ineligible voters to vote–is their best hope to gain power.

advertisement - learn more

Election Fraud

The 2018 Midterm elections saw many allegations by Republicans of voter fraud on the part of the Democratic Party, particularly in the case of Election Supervisor Brenda Snipes in Broward County and in an Arizona Senate race that was only decided days after the election, eventually calling Democrat Kyrsten Sinema the winner. There was a sense at the time that clear evidence of malfeasance was at hand, and Donald Trump was quite vocal in pointing it out. Investigations were started, but things seemed to die down after a while. Even the eventual ‘suspension’ of Brenda Snipes was far less than the full criminal investigation that was expected, especially since the suspension occurred after she had already indicated that she would be stepping down from the post.

People in the Q community were following the voter fraud allegations very closely, wondering if there would be a breakthrough in revealing to the public the incontestable fact that voter fraud occurred on a significant level in 2018 and has been going on, on the part of both parties, for quite some time. Remember that a political party is not a person with morals, it is an entity whose sole objective is power.

Now when Q was questioned late in 2018 by an anon as to whether or not voter fraud would be exposed by January, Q answered as follows:

>4280236
No.
2019 push Voter ID based on verifiable intel (fraud).
2020+ safeguarded.
Q

Effectively, those who had evidence of voter fraud (the ‘Patriots’/the Alliance) chose that rather than revealing voter fraud to the public, they would use their leverage against the Democratic party to facilitate a push for a Voter ID law in 2019. And sure enough, this is what Donald Trump has begun to argue for. This sequence of events is captured in the Twitter meme below.

Logical Thinking

Now it is hard to discount the ‘logical thinking,’ as Q is apt to say, behind the idea that a person should have proper identification in order to vote in the U.S. Federal election, as outlined in the tweet below:

In fact, most countries in the world have stronger voter ID regulations than the United States. But if it is so obvious, as it seems to be, it kind of makes you wonder why it has been the way it is for so long. Can we not see that politics in the United States has long been a game played from the shadows by powerful opposing global factions with differing ideologies, who make backroom deals and maneuvers in their fight for supremacy? And that the one thing they never disagree on is keeping it a secret that the visible, elected government is merely a show to give people the illusion of choice and the false perception that individual citizens actually have power within this system?

Voter ID will clearly benefit the Republican party. While it might happen to be the ‘right’ thing to do, let’s be clear that power is the reason that Donald Trump and the Republican party are aiming to push this initiative through.

The Takeaway

What is of greatest interest to human awakening is gaining access to the pure and unblemished truth. Though many ‘patriots’ could well argue that Donald Trump and the alliance behind him are bringing us in the right direction, it is important to see that they are doing it while trying to maintain a broken and corrupt system. Perhaps they believe that revealing voter fraud and other uncomfortable facts would lead to a breakdown of civil and social order. In other words, they don’t think we can handle the truth. And so they still play within the game.

Of course it’s possible that what Donald Trump and the alliance behind him are doing is the right thing for this present moment. However I do believe that the awakened community needs to be vigilant as the coming political upheaval is orchestrated, to make sure that we are not continuing to give away our power, and simply allowing a new dictator who we are anointing as ‘savior’ to take over from the old one, no matter if they are a bit more benevolent. Let’s not forget that our fate is to be directly responsible for our lives, and design a future society in the manner and making of our highest collective vision.

Related CE Article: Is The Q Narrative Providing False Hope? Catherine Austin Fitts Weights In 

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

Alternative News

Canadian Prime Minister Says We Won’t Return To Normal “Until A Vaccine Is Developed”

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Justin Trudeau expressed that things won't go back to 'normal' until a COVID-19 vaccine is developed."

  • Reflect On:

    Is a vaccine the only solution, or is something else going on here?

The push for a coronavirus vaccine continues strong, and the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, recently emphasized that point by saying Canadians will remain on ‘lockdown’ for potentially several months, and that what we here in Canada are experiencing “is the new normal, until a vaccine is developed.” (source) This sentiment recently shared by Trudeau echoes what Bill Gates recently stated in a Fox News interview, stating that we wont go back to “normal until” a vaccine has “gotten out to the entire world.” You can read more about that comment here, and watch him say it.

In that article, I wrote about vaccine hesitancy, how it’s grown and has gotten to the point where the World Health Organization has labelled it one of the biggest threats to public health. Whether or not that’s true, is up for you to decide. If vaccines were completely safe and effective for everybody, there wouldn’t be a growing number of physicians standing up for informed consent. Some high-profile speakers at the World Health Organization’s recent Global Vaccine Safety Summit also highlighted the fact that scientists and doctors are now skeptical about vaccines, yet despite this fact, anybody who shares any concerns about vaccines, or presents science showing that vaccines aren’t as safe as they’re marketed to be is instantly labelled as “anti-vaccine” by the mainstream media. Why are the many concerns that are being raised never addressed and rebutted, why are they simply ridiculed? And why is there a growing a mount of doctors and scientists who are questioning vaccine safety?

Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Projec emphasized at the WHO conference this point:

The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen–and we’re constantly looking at any studies in this space–still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider.

The vaccine discussion is a big one, with a lot of information so I’m not going to go into it entirely here as I’ve already done so with many of my articles.

Why are media outlets like Collective Evolution being censored, demonetized, silenced and having our social media platform distribution cut dramatically for simply sharing information? Why are awareness articles that are properly sourced and present the opinions and studies of various scientists and doctors flagged as “false news?”

advertisement - learn more

We are actually worried that our Facebook page will be deleted, so we are encouraging all those who want to continue to receive and be able to find our content to sign up for our email list

When it comes to such events, the national security state always seems to become even more heightened, and it seems that our basic human rights are constantly stripped from us. We saw it with the war on terror, and experts in the field like William Binney,  a former high ranking intelligence official with the National Security Agency (NSA) and one of the highest placed intelligence officials to ever blow the whistle on NSA surveillance programs, for example. He is one of many who have expressed that surveillance was not conducted with the intention of protecting humanity, it’s simply for total population control. This conclusion is not just the opinion of experts like him, but it’s one that many like me have come to after diving into false flag terrorism for years.

I personally believe we are seeing the same thing with regards to this coronavirus pandemic. It will be used politically to take more measures that serve the national security state by stripping us away of more rights and freedoms, under the guise of good will, kind of like what is happening now. Furthermore, the corporations that exercise complete control over the governments will take advantage, pushing hard that the only solution is a vaccine. And that’s what we’re seeing now.

One of the latest experts to share an opinion that counters what we’re seeing within the ‘mainstream’ comes from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history. He called these measures “draconian.” But there are many in the field who have expressed the same thing.  Bhakdi created a Youtube channel on March 18th, and has since posted four videos that have received more than one million views, total, in a very short span of time.

I wanted to keep this article short. If you wanted to get up to date with our perspective regarding the new coronavirus, we’ve covered it from multiple angles and you can refer to the articles posted below if you’re interested in going more in-depth.

CE Articles That Go More In Depth Regarding The Coronavirus

Bill Gates: We Won’t Go Back To “Normal Until” A Vaccine Has “Gotten Out To The Entire World

US Coronavirus Model Drops Predicted Deaths Down To Approximately 60,000 People

Coronavirus Deaths May Be Miscalculated

Donald Trump Says The Coronavirus Was “Artificially Induced”

Conscious Truth Behind Coronavirus Lockdown

Confirmed: High-Dose Vitamin C Has Successfully Treated 50 Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients

Renowned Microbiology Specialist On Why He Believes Coronavirus Measures Are “Draconian” (Video)

Updates On The New Coronavirus Vaccine – Are You Going To Take It? Will It Be Mandatory?

Multiple Stanford Medical Professors Question If COVID-19 Is Really “As Deadly As They Say”

Renowned German Pulmonologist Questions Coronavirus Measures & If They’re Necessary (Video)

Spring Has Sprung In Sweden With No Coronavirus Quarantine Or Police Enforced Lockdown

LA Doctor: COVID-19 Patients Go From ‘Very Ill’ To ‘Symptom-Free’ In 8 To 12 Hours With Hydroxychloroquine & Zinc

 

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

US Coronavirus Model Drops Predicted Deaths Down To Approximately 60,000 People

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, a research organization at the University of Washington, have revised their prediction based on updated data to approximately 60,000 deaths in the United States as a result of the new coronavirus.

  • Reflect On:

    Were the measures that governments took necessary? Should they have the ability and power to take away our rights and freedoms, and in some cases, our ability to go outside?

Special Note To Our Readers: We are concerned that our Facebook Page will be deleted, so we are encouraging all those who want to continue to receive and be able to find our content to sign up for our email list

You can also join our Telegram account here as we move away from Facebook. 

According the  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were approximately 45 million cases of the flu in the United States during the 2017-2018 influenza season, which resulted in nearly one million flu-associated hospitalizations and an estimated total of 61,000 deaths associated with the flu. It begs the question, did this overwhelm our hospitals that year? When it comes to the new coronavirus, the White House recently expressed that the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), a research organization at the University of Washington, have revised their prediction based on updated data to approximately 60,000 deaths in the United States as a result of the new corona virus, out of 327,000,000 Americans.

Keep in mind, this is not a comparison to the flu, at all, this is simply a prediction of numbers. If  the coronavirus ends up killing just as many people as the flu in the United States, that still doesn’t mean it’s the same.

This is encouraging, given that just last week, the White House was suggesting that up to 200,000 American citizens will die from the new coronavirus. The briefing included projections between 100,000 and 200,000 as a possible best-case scenario but obviously, this isn’t the case anymore. It’s also a dramatic drop from predictions that were ranging in the millions when the virus first started to make its way around the globe, causing fear, panic and hysteria, something many people are still experiencing today as a result of, I would say, media.

Another common theme that’s floating around right now is when people can take antibody tests, for those who desire to do so, because as you probably already know, the new coronavirus can still be present in someone who is asymptomatic. This has many experts suggesting that the total infection rate in the United States and globally is most probably significantly higher than what the numbers are showing. This means that the final death rate will most likely be much lower than what is and will be reported.

advertisement - learn more

Experts in the field have suggested that an accurate death rate will most likely match that of the common seasonal flu.  As soon as the World Health Organization put out a case fatality rate of 3.4% for the new coronavirus, multiple academics jumped in and criticized the projection. Three medical professors from Stanford University were among the first to do so. According to an article recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Dr. H. Clifford Lane, and Dr. Robert R. Redfield,  the case fatality rate may be less than one percent, and the clinical consequences of Covid-19 may be more similar to that of a severe seasonal influenza. You can read more about that and access that specific article, here.

Not only has the infection rate come under scrutiny, but so has the death rate. There is ample evidence suggesting that the number of deaths attributed to the new coronavirus have not actually come as a direct result of the coronavirus, that coronavirus deaths may actually be miscalculated.  I recently published an article about going into the evidence and providing more detail on that, you can read it here if interested.

So, at the end of the day, we may be looking at a higher infection rate, and a lower death rate than what the numbers show. This begs the question, are the actions multiple governments have taken at all justified?  Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history recently shared his thoughts on the measures that are being taken to combat the new coronavirus. He called them “draconian” and unnecessary, and explained why, to him, they don’t make any sense at all. You can read more about that and watch his video here.

It does make you think, doesn’t it? It’s even more of a head scratcher when people are being censored and deemed as ‘false news’ for simply sharing their opinion, like Dr. Ron Paul, who recently stated,

People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “pandemic” could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic.

That is not to say the disease is harmless. Without question people will die from coronavirus. Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure. But we have seen this movie before. Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms. When the “threat” is over, however, they never give us our freedoms back. (source)

One more thing that I must mention is with regards to the treatment. Events like the coronavirus are a great way to see what governments really care about. This was even more evident not only by the information above, but by the fact that successful treatments were not, and are not receiving much attention from the mainstream media. We have written about that in depth as well, you can see a few examples here, as well as here if you desire more information about that and what specific treatments we are talking about.

Meanwhile, Bill Gates can come on television and state that things won’t go back to normal until a vaccine has reached the entire world. But is this even true?

It begs the question, do our authorities and health care system/pharmaceutical companies actually prioritize our health? Or are they simply in it to turn a profit, among other things? Are our systems that surround us actually designed with the intention to protect us, and treat us? Or is something else going on here?

Are events like these simply used, created, heightened and capitalized on to usher in ‘bigger brother?’ A heightened national security state, one where our rights and freedoms are continually stripped from us, while many agree with the justification to do so as a result of massive propaganda? Similar to what we’ve seen with “the war on terror?”

These are just questions, and as time continues to pass they become more and more relevant, which is why asking these questions has now come under intense scrutiny.

The Bigger Picture

I believe events like this coronavirus pandemic, and others like 9/11 for example, are part of humanities natural evolution. I believe they are happening more frequently now in order to ‘wake up’ even more people, because that’s just what they do. At the end of the day, this pandemic will serve humanity more so than it hurts it, because when it comes down to it, the number of deaths and infections as a result of the new coronavirus won’t be to different from all of the other coronaviruses in circulation, which in itself will make people question just what has happened here. Scientists were able to see it early on, and there will be more publications like the paper recently published in The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents titled “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data which stated  “that the problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably being overestimated.” (source) The next question is, was the problem being over-estimated purposefully so a powerful group of people could propose the solution? This kind of thinking is far from a conspiracy theory.

At the end of the day, events like this make us question whether this is really the type of human experience we want to participate in? Why do we continue electing people? Why do we believe that powerful corporations will take care of our health? Why do we believe that one person or group of people can change the world? Why do we keep putting our power in the hands of the few and expecting them to make some sort of significant change on the planet? Why do we believe that electing a certain president will ever solve the real problems humanity faces today? Why are we all still participating and agreeing? Why do we constantly look to our governments for answers and solutions? Why do we continue to believe them? And why are we so easily manipulated and controlled to the point where mainstream media can control our thoughts, perception and emotions about certain events over, and over and over? Is it getting to a point where it’s a “do what we say” or else, type of existence, under the guise that those instructions are necessary for the greater good?

Manipulation and deception can only continue as long as we allow it, and the manipulation and deception we’ve faced with regards to this ‘pandemic’ again, will only serve and help more people question our current paradigm.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

The Vatican’s Cardinal George Pell Is Freed From Jail & His Child Sex Abuse Convictions Are Overturned

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Cardinal George Pell, a high ranking Vatican official who was convicted of child sexual abuse has been set free, and all charges have been dropped.

  • Reflect On:

    How many people in powerful places are involved in such activity?

Special Note To Our Readers: We are concerned that our Facebook Page will be deleted, so we are encouraging all those who want to continue to receive and be able to find our content to sign up for our email list

You can also join our Telegram account here as we move away from Facebook. 

Cardinal George Pell, who  a couple of years ago became  the highest ranking Vatican official to ever be convicted of child sexual abuse, has now been freed from jail after Australia’s highest court overturned his conviction. The 78 year old senior Catholic figure was facing a six-year jail sentence after a jury found he was guilty of sexually abusing two boys in Melbourne in the 1990s.  Seven judges ruled unanimously in Pell’s favour, stating that the jury who found him guilty had “not properly considered all the evidence presented at the trial.” Throughout the entire time, Pell maintained his innocence from the moment he was charged in June of 2017, and despite what’s happened since, regardless of whether he’s actually innocent or not, his case has brought even more attention to the on-going problem of pedophilia and sexual abuse in high level places, like the Vatican.

Although the conviction against Pell has been dropped, people will forever ponder if this man is actually guilty of what he was accused of, and perhaps much more. Unfortunately, sexual abuse within the Vatican, and other places of power has been an issue for quite some time. It begs the question, how is this type of activity able to persist and sustain itself? The answer may be simple, it could be that those involved are simply some of the most powerful people in the world. A retired police detective of 25 years, John Wedger, spent a lot of his time investigating child abuse and how it operates continually without being taken down. People are threatened, and in some cases those whom one goes to in order to solve the problem, a ‘higher up,’ is actually involved in it, and the investigation gets shut down You can watch the full testimony of Wedger, here.

It’s disturbing to contemplate the idea that Cardinal George Pell is or would be involved in such things, after all, he himself established The Diocesan Commission Into Sexual Abuse in 1996. If he is in fact guilty, this leads to the point above made by Wedger, that the people responsible for tackling this issue are actually involved and part of the problem. That being said, Pell is innocent under the law.

It’s no secret that sexual abuse scandals have plagued the Catholic Church for decades, and it seems almost every single year. For example, prior to the accusations against Pell, in 2015 a lawyer by the name of Ulrich Weber uncovered that for the the thirty year reign of boys choir run by Benedicts XVI’s elder brother, approximately 600 boys with a “high degree of plausibility” were victims of sexual and physical abuse, or both. The report identified 500 cases of physical abuse, and 67 cases of sexual abused committed by a total of 49 people in a position of power within the church. (source)

advertisement - learn more

Furthermore, it was only a few months ago when Carlo Maria Vigano, former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States and Secretary-General of the Governor of Vatican City, implicated multiple church officials, including Pope Francis, in sexual abuse. You can read more about that here.

With everything that’s emerged with regards to Jeffrey Epstein and child sex trafficking over the past couple of years alone, it really makes one wonder, Especially the fact that it seems Epstein was involved in a blackmail operation and working for some powerful people.

A couple of years ago, Pope Francis compared child abuse within the Catholic Church to a “satanic mass.”

The Reverend Gabriele Amorth is another example, he was an Italian Roman Catholic Priest, and an exorcist of the Diocese of Rome, which is an administrative branch of the Catholic Church of Rome. He claimed to have performed tens of thousands of exorcisms over his half a dozen plus decades as a Catholic Priest, and has mentioned a number of times how Satanism is practiced within the Vatican.  He has also claimed that girls are commonly kidnapped by a gang of Vatican police and foreign diplomats. He claimed that these girls are recruited for Vatican parties, and crimes with a sexual motive.

Malachi Martin, an Irish Catholic priest and writer on the Catholic Church who published many books exposing the Vatican was  originally ordained as a Jesuit priest, he eventually became Professor of Palaeography at the Vatican’s Pontifical Biblical Institute and was one of many who exposed the practice of Satanism within the Vatican.

These are just a few examples of why so many people believe something fishy is going on, regardless of whether or not Pell is innocent or guilty. Is something beyond the abuse of children happening here? Some sort of ‘ritual’ abuse? How has this been ongoing for so long? How are these people and places still able to operate with such power? It seems that they are quite untouchable.

If you’re curious and want to go a little deeper into this kind of thing, beyond the Vatican and into high ranking politicians, possible Royal Family pedophilia and more, you can refer to this article as it goes into much more detail and provides more information.

Our Interview With A Survivor of Elite Level Child Sex Trafficking

Anneke Lucas is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model.

Her work is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental and physical wellbeing after surviving some of the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12. Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network by her family, she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture.

We recently conducted an interview with her. Below is a clip from the four part series, as it was a very long and detailed interview. You can access the full interview and start your free trial HERE on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics.

Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!

Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!

You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.

Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Pod

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!