- The Facts:
Greta Thunberg has become the face of the Climate Change movement, being given every opportunity to make speeches of growing intensity rebuking world leaders about their inaction on adopting CO2 reduction schemes.
- Reflect On:
Why are certain people given the loudest microphone on the world stage while others have no chance to have their voices heard?
Before we start, I want to make it clear that this article is not intended to challenge the notion that human beings, and in particular industrial forces whose main source of energy is founded on the burning of fossil fuels, are directly responsible for the degradation of the planet and its natural ecosystems. The harmful effects of air pollution, water pollution, deforestation, soil degradation, and a host of other effects on both human and planetary health are very real and impossible to ignore, and urgently need to be addressed by the global community.
More specifically to the subject at hand here, this article is not intended to be a criticism of Greta Thunberg, her true motives, or the agenda of the people around her, including her parents. I have no informed opinion on this matter.
-->Watch now: Sign up for the free 5G Summit starting and hear from 40 of the world's leading experts on the subject, all FREE! Click here to register now!
What I want to speak about is much broader and more far-reaching than an examination of a particular individual and her influence on a single matter. What I want to speak about is the clear and repetitive pattern that infallibly evidences itself to careful observers of the struggle for control over geopolitical narratives.
In a recent episode of the Collective Evolution Show, Joe Martino and I discuss the Greta Thunberg phenomenon and examine a pattern that explains who gets to have a microphone to openly chastise world leaders and who doesn’t. Check out the opening clip below, and for the full episode and hundreds of other videos you can start a free 7-day trial on CETV:
Isn’t it puzzling that Greta Thunberg continues to be invited everywhere and given a tidy nameplate and a microphone to issue her dramatic protestations against world leaders? It’s not as though politicians avail themselves very readily to public dress-downs from “independent” citizens.
One would think, if she is being given so much chance to rebuke leaders over forecasts of tragedies that have not even come to pass, that children who have directly experienced real-life tragedies would get the opportunity to chastise our leaders as well. So let’s pose the questions:
- Are any victims of pedophilia and satanic ritual child abuse given a nameplate and an invitation to say “How dare you!”?
- Are the brothers and sisters of vaccine-injured children given a nameplate and an invitation to say “You should be ashamed of yourselves!”?
- Are children in forced labor factories given a nameplate and an invitation to say “You are failing us!”?
Of course not. Because all of these crimes are crimes of the globalists and serve their agenda. Hence, the globalists will always do their best to make sure these voices, that would testify on horrific first-hand, real-life experiences, are never heard.
But if, like Greta Thunberg, you are pushing a mass-media fueled globalist agenda, and have what it takes to inspire marches and impact geopolitical discourse because you are perceived by the general public as sincere and untainted by external forces, then you will indeed be handed the biggest microphone and given dramatic license to paint a picture arising from unsubstantiated speculations that you have no first-hand experience of:
“People are suffering, people are dying, entire ecosystems are collapsing, we are in the beginning of a mass extinction…” — Greta Thunberg, 2019 UN Climate Action Summit
Sorry if I don’t consider Greta Thunberg an authority on these matters.
She’s Not a Researcher, She’s a Politician
Greta’s talents do not lie in being a researcher or a scientist, much as there is somewhat of a perception that she has ‘done the research.’ She is far more like a politician, with a mind able to frame a narrative and be persuasive about the validity of that narrative.
Oh, she can parrot statistics handed to her about how much CO2 emissions should be reduced to meet arbitrary targets by what year, but pressed about the science that supposedly links CO2 to global warming, she can say little more than ‘the science is the science,’ and expect everybody to agree with her that the matter is settled. This despite commentary from the IPCC scientists themselves, whom she considers to be the authority on the matter, stating the unreality of these claims:
None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed (climate) changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases… No study to date has positively attributed all or part (of observed climate change) to anthropogenic (i.e. man-made) causes… Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the natural variability of the climate system are reduced.–1995 IPCC 2nd Assessment Report
The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future exact climate states is not possible. Rather the focus must be upon the prediction of the probability distribution of the system’s future possible states by the generation of ensembles of model solutions. —IPCC Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis’
She would surely be flummoxed if asked to explain these statements in light of her certainty behind her contention that ‘the science is the science.’
As I said, I don’t know the true source of Greta Thunberg’s advocacy, but given the consistency and sharpening of her narrative in lock-step with the globalist agenda for all countries to adopt carbon schemes like a tax or emissions trading, it would not surprise me if this was a role she is being heavily coached on and has been groomed for since long before we first heard about the ‘lonely girl’.
Greta Thunberg is not the first child to be used by powerful interests. Other children like Nayirah al-Ṣaba, Severn Cullis-Suzuki, Malala Yousafzai, and Bana Alabed were all paraded in front of the world stage to front one elite agenda or another. The matter at hand is not to focus on and criticize the individuals, especially children who are victims themselves, but rather to see the patterns of deception and develop our discernment so that such deception no longer achieves its objectives. When that happens, the truth will shine through effortlessly.
Related CE Article: Greta Thunberg Wants You To Be Scared & Big Business Will Make A Killing off It
Our Biology Responds To Events Before They Even Happen
- The Facts:
Multiple experiments have shown strong evidence for precognition in several different ways. One of them comes in the form of activity within the heart and the brain responding to events before they even happen.
- Reflect On:
Do we have extra human capacities we are unaware of? Perhaps we can learn them, develop them, and use them for good. Perhaps when the human race is ready, we will start learning more.
Is precognition real? There are many examples suggesting that yes, it is. The remote viewing program conducted by the CIA in conjunction with Stanford University was a good example of that. After its declassification in 1995, or at least partial declassification, the Department of Defense and those involved revealed an exceptionally high success rate:
To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the (remote viewing) phenomenon. Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise… The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions. (source)
The kicker? Part of remote viewing involves peering into future events as well as events that happened in the past.
It’s not only within the Department of Defense that we find this stuff, but a lot of science is emerging on this subject as well.
For example, a study (meta analysis) published in the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience titled “Predicting the unpredictable: critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity” examined a number of experiments regarding this phenomenon that were conducted by several different laboratories. These experiments indicate that the human body can actually detect randomly delivered stimuli that occur 1-10 seconds in advance. In other words, the human body seems to know of an event and reacts to the event before it has occurred. What occurs in the human body before these events are physiological changes that are measured regarding the cardiopulmonary, the skin, and the nervous system.
A few years ago, the chief scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, Dr. Dean Radin, visited the scientists over at HearthMath Institute and shared the results of one of his studies. Radin is also one of multiple scientists who authored the paper above. These studies, as mentioned above, tracked the autonomic nervous system, physiological changes, etc.
Scientists at HeartMath Institute (HMI) added more protocols, which included measuring participants’ brain waves (EEG), their hearts’ electrical activity (ECG), and their heart rate variability (HRV).
As HMI explains:
Twenty-six adults experienced in using HeartMath techniques and who could sustain a heart-coherent state completed two rounds of study protocols approximately two weeks apart. Half of the participants completed the protocols after they intentionally achieved a heart-coherent state for 10 minutes. The other half completed the same procedures without first achieving heart coherence. Then they reversed the process for the second round of monitoring, with the first group not becoming heart-coherent before completing the protocols and the second group becoming heart-coherent before. The point was to test whether heart coherence affected the results of the experiment.
Participants were told the study’s purpose was to test stress reactions and were unaware of its actual purpose. (This practice meets institutional-review-board standards.) Each participant sat at a computer and was instructed to click a mouse when ready to begin.
The screen stayed blank for six seconds. The participant’s physiological data was recorded by a special software program, and then, one by one, a series of 45 pictures was displayed on the screen. Each picture, displayed for 3 seconds, evoked either a strong emotional reaction or a calm state. After each picture, the screen went blank for 10 seconds. Participants repeated this process for all 45 pictures, 30 of which were known to evoke a calm response and 15 a strong emotional response.
The results of the experiment were fascinating to say the least. The participants’ brains and hearts responded to information about the emotional quality of the pictures before the computer flashed them (random selection). This means that the heart and brain were both responding to future events. The results indicated that the responses happened, on average, 4.8 seconds before the computer selected the pictures.
How mind-altering is that?
Even more profound, perhaps, was data showing the heart received information before the brain. “It is first registered from the heart,” Rollin McCraty Ph.D. explained, “then up to the brain (emotional and pre-frontal cortex), where we can logically relate what we are intuiting, then finally down to the gut (or where something stirs).”
Another significant study (meta-analysis) that was published in Journal of Parapsychology by Charles Honorton and Diane C. Ferrari in 1989 examined a number of studies that were published between 1935 and 1987. The studies involved individuals’ attempts to predict “the identity of target stimuli selected randomly over intervals ranging from several hundred million seconds to one year following the individuals responses.” These authors investigated over 300 studies conducted by over 60 authors, using approximately 2 million individual trials by more than 50,000 people. (source)
It concluded that their analysis of precognition experiments “confirms the existence of a small but highly significant precognition effect. The effect appears to be repeatable; significant outcomes are reported by 40 investigators using a variety of methodological paradigms and subject populations. The precognition effect is not merely an unexplained departure from a theoretical chance baseline, but rather is an effect that covaries with factors known to influence more familiar aspects of human performance.” (source)
“There seems to be a deep concern that the whole field will be tarnished by studying a phenomenon that is tainted by its association with superstition, spiritualism and magic. Protecting against this possibility sometimes seems more important than encouraging scientific exploration or protecting academic freedom. But this may be changing.”
– Cassandra Vieten, PhD and President/CEO at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (source)
We are living in a day and age where new information and evidence are constantly emerging, challenging what we once thought was real or what we think we know about ourselves as human beings. It’s best to keep an open mind. Perhaps there are aspects of ourselves and our consciousness that have yet to be discovered. Perhaps if we learn and grow from these studies, they can help us better ourselves and others.
The 5G Health Summit Starts Tomorrow (June 1st) – Reserve Your Free Spot Here
- The Facts:
A global online summit featuring doctors, scientists & activists addressing the health concerns of 5G technology and what people can do about it is set to take place the first week of June and it's free to sign up.
- Reflect On:
Why are safety concerns that've been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals called a "conspiracy theory?" Why is this idea ridiculed? Why don't our federal health regulatory agencies simply to some health safety testing before rolling it out?
Some of the world’s leading scientists, doctors and activists are gathering for a free online summit that begins on Monday June 1st and will run for approximately one week. The summit will dive into the health concerns of 5G technology, and why it’s a concern and what people can do about it. The summit is completely free to sign up and watch, and you can do so here.
We’ve also put together an E-book titled “Is 5G Safe? An Easy to Understand Guide” summarizing the published peer-reviewed research that is raising concerns about electromagnetic radiation that’s emitted from our favourite wireless devices, cell phones and more, as well as novel 5G technology. It’s a great resource that you can share with family or friends who desire to look at the proof, research, evidence and concerns that thousands of doctors and scientists have been and are creating awareness about all over the globe. We wrote it in language designed to be simple and factual.
Once you sign up for the summit, you get access to the free E-book.
It’s quite strange that any researched journalist could dismiss the health concerns of 5G technology, as well as 4G and 3G, when there are nearly 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies that raise cause for concern. A study published in 2019 in Frontiers in Public Health is one of many that raises concerns about 5G technology, explaining how there is no safety testing, and that in vivo and in vitro studies regarding this type of technology and it’s predecessors have shown that it’s harmful to human health, even at levels below current “safety” limits.
At the end of the day, whether you believe this type of technology is safe or you don’t, would it not be in the best interests of everybody to have the technology go through some type of required safety testing? Shouldn’t any technology that has any sort of biological effect be put through safety testing? Why has there not been any safety testing?
In December 2018, US. Senator Richard Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology. At a hearing, that took place last year, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and did the same thing to other industry representatives that were in attendance for not putting the technology through safety testing. You can watch a clip of that hearing and read more about it, here.
How can our federal health regulatory agencies approve products that are clearly a cause for concern?
This is why the summit is going to be such a great resource. It will answer many questions, and again, let people know what they can do about it!
Sign up for the free 5G Summit starting June 1st. Hear from 40 of the world’s leading experts on the subject, all FREE! Click here to register now!
Dr. Buttar Reveals Declassified Government Report Related to 5G Dangers
- The Facts:
Dr. Rashid Butter discusses a declassified report on millimetre wave technology and the effects it has on human health. These are the same waves used in 5G technology.
- Reflect On:
If we already know these waves cause harm to human health, why do we use them in airport scanners? Why are we about to roll out an entire wireless network based on these technologies?
People often say 5G hasn’t been tested, and to some extent that is true. But given 5G uses millimetre wave technology and that technology has been studied for quite some time, it has obviously been tested by those who have worked on them. So why hasn’t this information been widely released? Why are we not looking at the available data on millimetre wave technology as it relates to 5G?
Recently we came across 7 Russian studies that were summarized in a report declassified through the CIA. These studies were declassified in 2012 and marked “For Goverment Use Only.” From what you can gather very quickly in this report, the conclusions should shut down 5G rollout instantly. At least until someone can show, beyond any reasonable doubt, that this technology is safe.
Let’s have a quick look at how this report was concluded:
“Thus the conducted investigations indicate high biological activity and an unfavourable influence of millimeter radiowaves on the organism. The expression of the biological reactions increased with an increase of the period of iridation and depended on individual characteristics of the organism.”
What this translates to in plain English is, millimetre-wave frequencies do affect the human body negatively, and the longer the exposure, the more damage that occurs. Since 5G uses millimetre waves and is set to push a constant barrage of frequency on humans anywhere they go, this would mean sustained wave exposure, and thus inevitable biological damage.
Incredibly, these are the same wave technologies used in airport fully body scanners that we have been raising awareness about for years. It’s important to note, you CAN opt out of going through those scanners.
Dr. Rashid Buttar has given an incredible interview where he goes page by page as to exactly what this declassified CIA research reveals. The report summarizes 7 studies on the effects of millimeter-wave radiation levels between 37-60GHz. These levels are “safe” according to government, but that is NOT what the science says.
As we have said for the last year and a half, now is a potent time to understand the dangers of 5G and work to stop its rollout. This interview is a must listen. Click here to watch Dr. Rashid Buttar’s interview.
As we can tell in our world right now, a ton of truth is coming to the surface, the environment to create change is ripe. If we can stay grounded, in our hearts and avoid descending into hate, we can TRULY make a big difference here.
Dr. Buttar Reveals Declassified Government Report Related to 5G Dangers
People often say 5G hasn’t been tested, and to some extent that is true. But given 5G uses millimetre wave...
University Mathematician Decodes The Crop Circle With A Binary Code & Extraterrestrial Face
Did you know that crop circles are actually real? How they’re made and who or what is making them is...