Before you begin...

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Is the covid vaccine extremely safe and effective as the mainstream claims? Many would argue that it’s not as safe as it’s being made out to be. Stories of adverse reactions and deaths after the vaccine have been shared across social media networks since the vaccine began to roll out for citizens. Examples have come from multiple countries, like Norway, where there were more than two dozen deaths among senior citizens after the administration of the pfizer shot, the same thing has happened in Germany. A physician’s wife took to Facebook in the United States explaining how her husband died shortly after vaccine administration, and these seem to be a few of many examples. In the United States, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows 1,739 deaths reported, and 734 permanent disabilities and nearly 4,000 hospitalizations thus far.

This may seem like a lot, but it’s easily argued that it’s not, and that’s because more than 80 million people have already had at least one dose of the vaccine in the United States, and approximately 450 million people across the globe have had the same. That’s nearly one billion people. If you do the math simply using the numbers in the United States, there doesn’t seem to be much of an argument. It’s highly unlikely that you’re going to be severely injured by the vaccine or die. The odds seem to be extremely low.

That being said, it’s also important to mention that VAERS has been estimated to capture approximately one percent of vaccine injuries because the majority of them are believed to be unreported.  A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) in the United States found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million.

For example, From 1990 to 2007 there were about 80,000 US cases of Kawasaki disease; during the same period just 56 US cases were reported to VAERS–0.07%. (Hua et al, Pediatr Inf Dis J 2009: 28:943-947) The cause of KD is unknown; it is rare, it is very serious, and it is prevalent among young and frequently vaccinated children. If any event deserves prompt reporting to VAERS it is Kawasaki disease, but this does not happen.

There are also concerns regarding long term health, more on that in a bit.

In my opinion, the number of injuries and reported deaths so far warrant freedom of choice. Furthermore, there are a lot of questions regarding the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine. (How effective is the covid vaccine)?  Making the vaccine mandatory to eat at certain restaurants, travel, and attend school perhaps is raising great cause for concern among many experts in the field, but you don’t hear about them because they’ve been heavily censored. For example, I recently published an article about  Jonas F. Ludvigsson, a paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute. He has announced that he is quitting his work on covid-19 because of harassment from people who dislike what he discovered, that no schoolchildren (nearly two million) died from covid during the first wave despite schools being open, no lockdown and no mask mandates.

Martin Kulldorff, a medical professor at Harvard university and vaccine safety expert recently tweeted,

After having protecting themselves while working class were exposed to the virus, the vaccinated #Zoomers now want #VaccinePassports where immunity from prior infection does not count, despite stronger evidence for protection. One more assault on working people. 

There are multiple studies hinting at the point the professor makes, that those who have been infected with covid may have have immunity for years, and possibly even decades. For example, according to a new study authored by respected scientists at leading labs, individuals who recovered from the coronavirus developed “robust” levels of B cells and T cells (necessary for fighting off the virus) and “these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time.” This is just one of many examples. There are studies that suggest infection to prior coronaviruses, which prior to covid-19 circles the globe infecting hundreds of millions of people every single year, can also provide protection from covid-19.

Furthermore, we are dealing with a virus that has a 99.95-97 percent survival rate for people under the age of 70.  With this information, why would the push for vaccine mandates, like “vaccine passports” for example, be so strong?  How effective is the vaccine compared to natural immunity? Can it even prevent infection?

Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor at the British Medical Journal published a piece in the Journal issuing a word of caution about the supposed “95% Effective” COVID vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. You can access that here.

What about the catastrophic harms and uselessness of lockdowns that continue to remain ignored within the mainstream?

“Sensitize Vaccine Recipients To More Severe Disease”

A few other papers have raised concerns as well, for example. A study published in October of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice states:

 COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”

For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.

Millions of people and children get vaccinated without any adverse reactions. It’s easy why so many believe they are completely safe. But what about long term consequences and the concerns raised above. The list of long term concerns are many when it comes to vaccines. For example, what about aluminum containing vaccines? Science shows us that injected aluminum doesn’t come into the same methods of excretion as ingested aluminum, and that it may persist within the body and end up the brain where it is detectable, at least in animal models, years later. You can read more about that and access some of the science here.  This implicates aluminum containing vaccines in variety of diseases, like alzheimer’s disease, autism and parkinson’s for example, yet when you mention this it’s instantaneously shut down. When that happens and science is ignored and unacknowledged, we are not living in an age of science but rather an age of corruption and dogma.

A few years ago, a team of Scandinavian scientists conducted a study and found that African children inoculated with the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine, during the early 1980s had a 5-10 times greater mortality than their unvaccinated peers.

They state,

 It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials.All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.

Furthermore, there are questions with regards to the effectiveness of some vaccines. Take the MMR vaccine as an example. There are many examples of measles outbreaks in fully vaccinated people. You can read and learn more about that here and here.

These and many other reasons are why vaccine hesitancy continues to grow. Especially with the covid vaccine.  Riverside County, California has a population of approximately 2.4 million, and about 50 percent of healthcare workers in the county are refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine despite the fact that they have top priority and access to it.  At Providence Holy Cross Medical Center in Mission Hills, one in five frontline nurses and doctors have declined the shot. Roughly 20% to 40% of L.A. County’s frontline workers who were offered the vaccine did the same, according to county public health officials. You can read more about that story here.

A survey conducted at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital shows that only 40 percent of healthcare workers will not take the COVID-19 vaccine once it’s available to them. You can read more about that story here.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) protects the vaccine manufacturers (pharmaceutical companies) from any liability, and the money comes out of the taxpayers pocket. In the United States, the VICP has paid out more than $4 billion dollars due to vaccine injuries. Since 2015, the program has paid out an average total of $216 million to an average of 615 claimants each year.

All of this and more, in my opinion, makes vaccine mandates completely baseless, immoral and unscientific. Should we really give governments and private corporations the power to implement such measures? All of this is done on the assumption that vaccines are extremely effective and it’s all done on the basis of “herd immunity.” Should mandates be allowed when things are not so black and white as they are marketed to be?

In a 2014 analysis in the Oregon Law Review by New York University (NYU) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E. Zachary (who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry), the authors claim that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “have not attained herd immunity for any childhood disease.” This is one of multiple reasons why so many suggest voluntary choice as opposed to vaccine mandates.

The legal scholars’ review discusses a number of other problems that make the theoretical concepts of vaccine efficacy and herd immunity highly imperfect in practice and, in fact, unachievable.

Perhaps the world would be a better place if, when it comes to vaccines and other measures to combat covid, they were simply encouraged and recommended rather than mandated. Using coercion and the threat of taking away rights and freedoms under the guise of good will is never a good idea.

When it comes to covid, other successful treatments have been ridiculed and ignored, deaths that are not a result of covid have been marked as covid deaths, and there seems to be large amounts of corruption that has plagued the “science” behind this virus. The good news is that covid has been a catalyst for so many people on our planet to see this type of activity, something that may not have been visible to them before. It’s been a great catalyst for a shift in human consciousness, just like 9/11.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Before you begin...

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

It’s quite odd how so many of the world’s leading scientists have collectively opposed lockdown measures and presented data in the form of published peer-reviewed scientific literature showing they are completely ineffective for stopping the spread of covid (and will kill more people than covid) yet these scientists get absolutely no attention. When they do get attention they are ridiculed and made out to seem as if they are in the minority. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the mainstream can make the majority seem like the minority, and the minority seem like the majority. Based on my research, there is an overwhelmingly large amount of people within the medical and scientific community who completely oppose the measures being taken and the recommendations being made by government health authorities when it comes to combating covid.

The censorship of science during this pandemic has been unprecedented. Numerous renowned scientists have brought attention to this, including Dr. Sunetra Gupta, who is regarded by many as the world’s pre-eminent infectious disease epidemiologist.  Herself, along with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist, are the initiators of The Great Barrington Declaration.

Censorship is taking its toll on many. For example, a letter to the editor published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden” has found that “Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic…No child with Covid-19 died…Among the 1,951,905 children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.”

It was published by Jonas F. Ludvigsson, a paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute. He recently announced that he is quitting his work on covid-19 because of harassment from people who dislike what he discovered. You can read more about that here.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health. Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency – a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. – Dr. Kamran Abbasi, former executive editor of the British Medical Journal, editor of the Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

Below is a rare and informative interview with Gupta if you’re interested. It’s strange how someone like Dr. Anthony Fauci can achieve instant virality and go on any television station he wants, along with other political scientists who seem to be going with the grain, yet when renowned experts present the type of information and opinions seen in this interview, it remains unacknowledged.

The Takeaway: Just like 9/11, covid has been a large catalyst for many people to question what’s really happening on our planet, why we live the way we do and why we continue to give so much power to people who may not be acting in our best interest. It really calls into question the idea whether or not governments should have the authority to force people into certain measures when so many disagree with them. Should people not have the right to look at information and decide for themselves what is and what isn’t? Should governments have the ability to take away our rights and freedoms under the guise of good will, or the claim of good will when there is so much evidence that suggests otherwise? Something to think about.

We (Collective Evolution) have written a number of articles on this subject explaining the harms of lockdown measures, and we continue to do so simply because this perspective is not being shared at all by mainstream media. There is no balance when it comes to mainstream media, and they continue to fail to have appropriate conversations about viewpoints they deem “controversial.”

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Before you begin...

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Stories of the Star People are well documented in Native Canadian and Native American lore, and in this article I will share a story, as I’ve done so many times before (see more examples here), from the work of Dr. Ardy Clarke, a Professor Emeritus at Montana State University who is Cherokee/Choctaw. She has been researching the Star People and collecting encounters between them and Native Indians for many years. She also grew up being told about the Star People from her family and elders.

She’s written multiple books documenting her research. This particular one is taken from her book, “Encounters With Star People, Untold Stories of American Indians.”

The story below comes from Clarke’s encounter with a manned named Russell. A Native Indian and a vietnam war veteran who grew up being abused at a religious boarding school.

The discussion between them began.

It was at the boarding school. I was about seven years old. The priest took me to the chapel. He told me to kneel. He said I had to stay there all day unless I spoke English. When the priest left, I heard him lock the door. I remember how salty my tears tasted and I worried that I would have to pee, when suddenly a light appeared outside the chapel window and a being appeared. At first, I thought it was one of the older boys coming to rescue me. But instead, as I was to learn, it was no older boy but a star traveler. He picked me up, held me close, and we walked right through the wall like it wasn’t there. He helped me escape.

Clarke then asked him to describe the star traveller.

They were robot-like. More like bugs than men, but I was so happy to be out of the chapel and away from those nuns and priests that I didn’t care. The devil himself could have taken me to hell and I would have been happy. I think these star travelers were watching the school. Maybe my old man was right. They do watch after us. Anyway, they taught me mind control. They helped me learn to live with pain and to survive in isolation.

“How did they do that” Clarke asked.

I don’t know. But after that first incident , I never felt pain again. I could have knelt for 58 hours on that chapel floor and spit in the face of the priest and kelt 48 more. I just felt nothing. When I went to Vietnam and was captured and tortured, I felt no pain. I had learned to dissociate myself from my body and not feel pain.

I think the Star People understood me. They knew when the stress was becoming too much for me. That’s when they would come. I always went willingly not because I particularly liked them, but because I could get away from a more uncomfortable situation.

“You mean, going with the Star People was more comfortable than staying in school or the army or in prison,” Clarke stated.

Yes, yes and yes. And if I were with them, I was in control.”

They taught me mind control and I learned to use it against them. In fact, they found my ability to use mind control quite interesting. before I cooperated with them, I made them do things for me. We were in a prison camp. Very little food. I made them bring me fruit. In boarding school they took away my meals a lot. In the prison camp, none of us got enough food, so I would insist that they get fruit for me. Oranges. Apples. Bananas. That’s when I learned that I could turn the tables on them. When I was able to suggest that I needed fruit and it appeared.

“In return for fruit, what did you have to do for them?” Clarke asked.

Submit to their physical exams. Allow them to collect sperm and whatever samples they needed. They did experiments on my eyes and nose. Exposed my eyes to various liquids, various degrees of light. They do not have eyes like ours or noses. I think they find our eyes curious. They took a lot of blood from me.

He then explained that they taught him how to control his pain, and described the procedure as follows,

There are panels and they set you inside them. The panels move; one part moves in one direction, another part moves in another direction. They move faster and faster until you become one with the panels and after that you feel no pain.

Clarke then asks, “Explain this to me. If they could come and get you, why didn’t they help you escape the prison and return you to the reservation? After all, the military would have just thought you were missing in action.”

I could have have chosen that route perhaps. I never explored it. When you’re in a prison camp, there is a camaraderie that develops with survival. There is no way I could leave behind my buddies, and there was no way the Star People would have removed all of them to safety. They have some kind of principles about not interfering with lives if it will change the course of history. I don’t think that my life would have changed history, but there was one guy I was with that became a politician. Another became a CEO of a big company. So maybe removing them would have made them different people. I just somehow understood that was not an option and was not something I wanted. Just having them come to me was enough of a relief from being a prisoner. They made it manageable.

Clark asks, “Why do you think the Star People abduct humans?”

I think they are scientists exploring new worlds.

Clarke then asks, “Do you see them as good or evil?”

I saw them as good when they rescued me, but I saw an evil side, too. I saw them hurt people without teaching them how to control pain. They didn’t seem to care.

He explained that he saw them abduct many people, “but most when I was in the military, several times they would take everyone in our barracks. They even took our guns.”

Clark asks, “What did they do with your guns?”

Just examine them. They never kept them. When they returned us to the barracks, none of the guys had any memory of the event. I always thought that was strange. I mentioned it to one guy once and he asked me if I was trying to pretend insanity to get out of the service. He told me it wouldn’t work.

Final Thoughts: I’ve been into this topic for more than fifteen years, and I can tell you that the lore, not just from American Indian stories, but from all cultures is filled with experiences with what seem to be benevolent beings. That being said, there are also stories of the opposite, or at least what we perceive to be the opposite. When it comes to the mainstream “UFO” disclosure, which has not yet been associated with the extraterrestrial phenomenon as much, characterizing the behaviour of these objects as a “threat” seems to be an issue among many. You can read more about that here.

Based on what I’ve looked into, I believe there are multiple races from “elsewhere” that have visited our planet, and others. But who knows?

When it comes to stories of the “Star People” from Clarke’s book, like many other supposed contact experiences there are many similarities and corroborations between these experiences, with minor differences. I find the consistency among stories quite interesting, but again, there are differences. If you read her book, or the articles I’ve published sharing stories from her book (link at the beginning of the article) you will see what I mean.

At the end of the day, this topic, whether it be exploring lore or sifting through declassified documentation and/or high ranking testimony, opens up many more questions that go far beyond “are we alone?” and “have we been visited?”

A fascinating topic no doubt, one that I believe has a strange and unexplainable connection to human beings “waking up” and asking more questions about what it is we do here on our planet, why we do it, and realizing that we as a collective have an unlimited amount of potential to create a human experience where everybody can thrive.

If you’re interested in reading more of our articles on the UFO/extraterrestrial subject, you can find all of them here.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.