Connect with us

General

Elon Musk Questions COVID-19 Testing After Receiving Opposite Results On The Same Day

Avatar

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Elon Musk recently revealed he had completed four rounds of COVID-19 testing, tweeting that something "bogus" is going on because two of the tests came back false, and the other two came back positive.

  • Reflect On:

    Why is there so much conflicting information about COVID-19? Why are so many scientists and doctors providing information that contradicts government health authorities?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Elon Musk Questions COVID-19 Testing After Tests Gave Him Opposite Results On Same Day

advertisement - learn more

Do we need even more confusion added to the table when it comes to COVID data and information? No, but we keep getting it, why? Is it possible we are not taking collective notice of what doesn’t add up with COVID? Is it possible we are not learning to communicate and come to a collective agreement on what’s happening because only one side of the story is being given airtime? Is it possible this current is also telling us something about our collective consciousness and current ways of thinking, but we simply aren’t taking the time to look?

--> Our Journalism Is Moving - Our investigative journalism and reporting is moving to our new brand called The Pulse. Click here to stay informed.

When it comes to COVID-19, many people are concerned that the intentions and supposed ‘solutions’ of governments, politicians and big corporations are not in the publics’ best interest. Throughout this pandemic, we’ve seen a growing lack of trust in governments worldwide, and it calls into question whether people are truly represented by government, especially when many scientists and doctors are being censored, ridiculed, and completely ignored simply because they have different observations about COVID-19. All this, while we head towards, as the World Economic Forum deems it, “The Great Reset.”

What Happened: One issue with regards to COVID-19 that doesn’t seem to be getting the attention it deserves is the lack of consistency in testing methods. It is one of the top metrics used to quantify the severity of this pandemic, yet there seems to be ongoing issues with PCR testing. Elon Musk recently pointed out what he feels is greater proof of this problem in a tweet stating:

The idea that Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing is inadequate to identify the COVID-19 virus within humans first came to my attention when the Bulgarian Pathology Association claimed that they are “scientifically meaningless.”  They cite an article published in “Off Guardian” that makes some very interesting points that have come from not only the scientists and doctors cited in that article, but many.

It’s been a common theme. Well after this, British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab stated that:

“The false positive rate is very high, so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the virus.”

In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University and outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic, wrote a piece titled: “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?” He has argued that due to a bit of a fluke involving some slightly complicated statistics, the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could be as high as 50%, this would correlate with Elon Musk’s recent experience.

Former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon argued the proportion of positive tests that are false is actually “around 90%”.

How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.

22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why, according to them, it’s quite clear that the PCR test is not effective in identifying COVID-19 cases.

The Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada, Dr. Barbara Yaffe recently stated that COVID-19 testing may yield at least 50 percent false positives. This means that people who test positive for COVID may not actually have it.

It’s been a common theme for quite some time, which is why many people are confused as to how a pandemic and so many millions of cases can be declared using such a faulty detecting method.

That being said, there are many claims that PCR testing is indeed accurate, According to Dr. Matthew Oughton, an infectious diseases specialist at the McGill University Health Centre and the Jewish General Hospital in Montrea stated:

”The rate of false positives with this particular test is quite low. In other words, if the test comes back saying positive, then believe it, it’s a real positive.”

A look around the internet will return so much conflicting evidence with regards to the PCR testing, lading people to feel unsure about what to believe, and tests like the ones Musk just went through don’t really help to bring trust to the current mainstream narrative. Tanzania’s President John Magufuli has dismissed imported coronavirus testing kits as faulty, saying the tests returned positive results on samples they took from a goat and a pawpaw, which of course shouldn’t be possible and doesn’t make much sense.

Not only has testing come into question, but deaths being attributed to COVID that aren’t actually a result of COVID, or where it’s unclear if COVID played a part, have also been listed as COVID deaths, causing many people to feel numbers are being inflated. So, there seems to be a good possibility that the number of deaths attributed to COVID may be far less than what we’ve been told, and there also seems to be a good possibility that the number of confirmed cases is also far less than we’ve been told.

These and many more reasons are why tens of thousands of doctors and scientists from around the world have been strongly opposing COVID lockdown measures, stating their belief that this ‘pandemic’ does not at all require the interventions that are being taken by the government.

The Takeaway: The world is divided on so many issues right now, and COVID, like the recent U.S. presidential race, is a prime example. What’s discouraging to see is people claiming those who can’t see their own perspective are incapable of reasoning, examining information and getting to any sort of truth. No matter how deep we are into our beliefs about what is going on, being able to empathize with another person and trying ourselves to understand why it is they feel the way they do is the only way forward and have an appropriate discussion as well as help others to view events from an alternative perspective.  Constantly creating awareness on issues your passionate about from a judgemental and rude place only reinforces our problems.

Beyond any solution to the world’s problems, the number one solution is a shift in consciousness. This means changing the way we see ourselves, others, our world, how our thoughts, emotions and feelings impact the world, how we feel within, all play a huge factor in manifesting the ‘reality’ we see take shape outside of ourselves.

There are a number of ways to go about doing this, and a number of factors that contribute to humanity having a shift in consciousness. Awareness of mind-matter interaction, for example, and non-material science that’s emerging that doesn’t fit within the accepted framework of our reality that causes us to question what we thought we knew, or through events like 9/11, and now COVID-19. Each plays its own part in shifting human consciousness, a process we are currently going through and have gone through during all stages of humanity.

Through all these factors humanity begins to recognize that our world is not what we’ve been made to believe it is, and a new way of perceiving our world begins to take place that changes the way we look at things from within, thus changing the world outside of ourselves.

We are creating this human experience. We are dictating what’s happening, almost like a holographic universe. This is important to recognize because any time we want, we can change this human experience to something that resonates with us all.

Ultimately, change does not come from solutions, it comes from the consciousness behind these solutions. For example, what does the human race do with the discovery of nuclear energy, or so called ‘free energy’? Do we turn it into something that can help us explore, generate clean energy, make developments that can benefit the collective? Or do we use it to profit off of and make weapons? Do we make it inaccessible to the majority while having it rest in the hands of the 1 %?  It’s the consciousness behind, in this example, the technology that determines our direction, not the technology itself. Solutions fail to become solutions when human greed, ego and malicious intention seek to capitalize on them.

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Attention Readers: We’ve Moved Our Journalism To The Pulse

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 1 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A large portion of our journalism that you’re used to seeing on our Collective Evolution platform has now moved over to The Pulse. We will be publishing most of our news articles there, while Collective Evolution focuses more on personal development.

You can follow The Pulse on Telegram, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.  

We’ve done this for a number of reasons, mainly due to the struggles we’ve had with regards to extreme censorship at Collective Evolution. We hope you join us over at The Pulse in our quest to keep doing what we do!

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

Abductions & Car Vandalism – Startling Australian UFO Report Unclassified

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An uncovered Australian report performed by their Department of Defence. “Scientific Intelligence — General — Unidentified Flying Objects” is trending again. Those who have done extensive research on UFOs will find the Australian version of disclosure to be far more intellectually honest than the American version. Albeit it was conducted decades ago.

According to ex-US intelligence official Luis Elizondo, the Defense Department’s Inspector General is presently conducting three reviews. The inquiries vary from the Department of Defense’s handling of UFO claims to Elizondo’s alleged whistleblower retribution. The open IG cases are crucial to Australia’s report because they establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the US Department of Defense is being dishonest and shady when it comes to the UFO subject. For decades, Australia has been a loyal friend of the United States. Within Australia’s boundaries, they share a military installation (Pine Gap). When a close defense ally’s intelligence agencies determined that the US was not being intellectually honest in its approach, perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that there is more to the tale than the 144 incidents studied since 2004 by the UAPTF.

The CIA became alarmed at the overloading of military communications during the mass sightings of 1952 and considered the possibility that the USSR may take advantage of such a situation.

Australian UFO study.

According to the summary, OSI, acting through the Robertson-Panel, encouraged the USAF to use Project Blue Book to publicly “debunk” UFOs. In a tragic twist of fate, when Australian authorities sought explanations from the US Air Force, the allegation was debunked. The authors of the study were depicted as conspiratorial and even crazy by the US Air Force. Ross Coulthart reported this, and it may be heard in a recent Project Unity interview. Courthart is an award-winning investigative journalist who is drawn to forbidden subjects. He also stated on the same podcast that a senior US Navy official identified as Nat Kobitz told him that the US had been in the midst of reverse-engineering numerous non-human craft. According to his obituary, Mr. Kobitz was a former Director of Research and Development at Naval Sea Systems Command.

Continue reading the entire article at The Pulse. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

PGA Tour To End COVID Testing For Both Vaccinated & Non-Vaccinated Players

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The PGA Tour has announced that it will stop testing players every week, regardless of whether they have been vaccinated or not.

  • Reflect On:

    Are PCR tests appropriate to identify infectious people? Should people who are healthy and not sick be tested at all, anywhere?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The picture you see above is of John Rahm, a professional golfer on the PGA tour being carted off the golf course after tournament officials told him he had COVID. He was healthy and had no symptoms, yet was forced to withdraw from the tournament. He was told in front of the camera’s, and a big scene was made out of the event. You would think something like that, especially when you are a big time sports figure, would be done behind closed doors with some privacy.

Earlier on in June a spokesperson for the PGA Tour said that more than 50 percent of players on the PGA tour have been vaccinated. Although it seems that the majority of players on the tour will be fully vaccinated judging by this statement, it does leave a fairly large minority who won’t be, and that’s something we’re seeing across the globe as COVID vaccine hesitancy remains high for multiple reasons.

We are pleased to announce, after consultation with PGA Tour medical advisors, that due to the high rate of vaccination among all constituents on the PGA Tour, as well as other positively trending factors across the country, testing for COVID-19 will no longer be required as a condition of competition beginning with the 3M Open. – PGA tour Senior VP Tyler Dennis

The tour recently announced that the testing of players every week will stop starting in July for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This was an unexpected announcement given the fact that, at least it seems in some countries, vaccinated individuals will enjoy previous rights and freedoms that everyone did before the pandemic. Travelling without need to quarantine and possibly in the future not having to be tested could be a few of those privileges. Others may include attending concerts, sporting events, or perhaps even keeping their job depending on whether or not their employer deems it to be mandatory, if that’s even legally possible. We will see what happens.

Luckily for professional golfers, regardless of their vaccination status they won’t have to worry about testing positive for COVID, especially if they’re not sick. This is the appropriate move by the PGA tour, who is represented by their players and it’s a move that the players themselves may have had a say in. It’s important because PCR tests are not designed nor are they appropriate for identifying infectious people. A number of scientists have been emphasizing this since the beginning of the pandemic. More recently, a letter to the editor published in the Journal of infection explain why more than half of al “positive” PCR tests are likely to have been people who are not infectious, otherwise known as “false positives.”

This is why the Swedish Public Health agency has a notice on their website explaining how and why polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are not useful for determining if someone is infected with COVID or if someone can transmit it to others, and it’s better to use someone who is actually showing symptoms as a judgement call of whether or not they could be infected or free from infection.

PCR tests using a high cycle threshold are extremely sensitive. An article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35, only 3 percent of the samples showed viral replication. This can be interpreted as, if someone tests positive via PCR when a Ct of 35 or higher is used, the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 percent. This begs the question, why has Manitoba, Canada, for example, using cycle thresholds of up to 45 to identify “positive” people?

When it comes to golf, the fact that spread occurring in an outdoor setting is highly unlikely could have been a factor, but it’s also important to mention that asymptomatic spread within one’s own household is also considerably rare. It really makes you wonder what’s going on here, doesn’t it?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Elevate your inbox and get conscious articles sent directly to your inbox!

Choose your topics of interest below:

You have Successfully Subscribed!