Connect with us

General

Leaked Documents Explicitly Expose How Facebook ‘Censors’ Vaccine Concerns

Avatar

Published

on

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    Two Facebook Insiders have come forward with internal company documents detailing a plan to curb “vaccine hesitancy” (VH) on a global scale.

  • Reflect On:

    Why is credible information being censored? Why are doctors, scientists and other experts in the field being censored for simply sharing their concerns about vaccines? If there are legitimate concerns, shouldn't the public have the right to know?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

Censorship is something we here at Collective Evolution have experienced many times – especially at the hands of Facebook. We began our work in 2009, growing our following on Facebook to over five million people, with a website viewership of tens of millions of page views a month. We were a fast growing company with big plans and then, all of a sudden, Facebook changed their algorithms. Not only that, they began knocking “less trusted” brands out of their algorithm as well. Over the course of a year, our viewership dropped drastically. This cost our company millions in revenue over just a couple of years. Then, our articles began getting flagged as “fake news,” causing even more restrictions on our page despite the fact that the news was not fake at all.

advertisement - learn more

This is why it’s no surprise to us to learn of Facebook whistleblowers who recently came forward to Project Veritas and outlined, very clearly, how Facebook censors vaccine information. More on this in a moment.

--> Our Journalism Is Moving - Our investigative journalism and reporting is moving to our new brand called The Pulse. Click here to stay informed.

As of 2020, many of the world’s most renowned doctors, scientists and infectious disease experts in the field began experiencing the same censorship we experienced over the last 5 or so years. Any information or evidence that threatens the “accepted” narrative around COVID-19, and many other topics, is quickly done away with and censored. On top of that, it receives no attention within the mainstream media. This is a new effort in the battle to control the most precious resource on planet Earth, the human mind and how the masses perceive certain major global issues, like COVID, which has become extremely politicized alongside other major issues.

The birth of independent media and people seeking out other sources for information beyond mainstream media was, and still is, a major threat to the small group of companies that have always been humanity’s source of news and information.

Dealing with Facebook “fact-checkers” is another nightmare in itself. Carl Heneghan, an emergency GP, professor at Oxford University and director of their Centre for Evidence-Based medicine is one of many who have had their articles labelled as “false” by Facebook regarding the effectiveness of masks. We recently had an article filled with peer-reviewed medical and scientific research labelled false as well. The particular fact-checker, “Lead Stories”, did not provide an explanation nor reply to our inquiry as to why they considered our article to be false. This is actually a bit uncommon as fact checkers do often respond, even when it’s clear their ‘opinion’ is causing them to think your article is false, not actual facts or evidence.

It’s hard to deal with Facebook fact-checkers, and when you do get a hold of them, they do not want to entertain a conversation unless you bend to their will and change what the article says. It is flat out censorship. You’re just not allowed to say certain things these days without being punished for it.

advertisement - learn more

It’s the same thing with vaccines. No matter how many scientists, doctors and/or renowned vaccine experts raise questions and concerns regarding vaccine safety, they are subjected to the same type of treatment. I recently wrote one example regarding a Harvard professor of medicine,  it’s one of many great examples.

As a result of demonetization on all platforms, combined with the censorship we experience, we opened up a CE Membership option to support our work. Gone are the days when we don’t have to rely on our audience to stay afloat. We feel this is a big part of the design of censorship, to cripple a company’s ability to fund itself, especially if that company has a large reach.

Whistleblowers: How Facebook Censors

Two Facebook insiders came forward with internal company documents detailing plans to change “vaccine hesitancy.” This isn’t really a secret, as Facebook went public with these plans a while ago. The issue is that Facebook is censoring legitimate scientific and medical research, regardless of how true or credible it is, so long as it paints vaccines in a concerning light. How does this make any sense? Shouldn’t legitimate concerns about vaccine safety be shared with everybody openly and freely? Why would there be such an effort to hide them? Is this not unethical? If this is really about what’s best for our health wouldn’t everybody, both “pro” and “anti” vaccine want further investigation into these concerns?

The two whistleblowers went to Project Veritas to bring their story public. According to them, the goal at Facebook has been to “drastically reduce user exposure” to certain content surrounding vaccines, as well as decrease engagement, viewership, and more. According to one of the whistleblowers, “They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page, before you even see it.”

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Advertisement
advertisement - learn more

General

Attention Readers: We’ve Moved Our Journalism To The Pulse

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 1 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A large portion of our journalism that you’re used to seeing on our Collective Evolution platform has now moved over to The Pulse. We will be publishing most of our news articles there, while Collective Evolution focuses more on personal development.

You can follow The Pulse on Telegram, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.  

We’ve done this for a number of reasons, mainly due to the struggles we’ve had with regards to extreme censorship at Collective Evolution. We hope you join us over at The Pulse in our quest to keep doing what we do!

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

Abductions & Car Vandalism – Startling Australian UFO Report Unclassified

Gautam Peddada

Published

on

By

2 minute read

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

An uncovered Australian report performed by their Department of Defence. “Scientific Intelligence — General — Unidentified Flying Objects” is trending again. Those who have done extensive research on UFOs will find the Australian version of disclosure to be far more intellectually honest than the American version. Albeit it was conducted decades ago.

According to ex-US intelligence official Luis Elizondo, the Defense Department’s Inspector General is presently conducting three reviews. The inquiries vary from the Department of Defense’s handling of UFO claims to Elizondo’s alleged whistleblower retribution. The open IG cases are crucial to Australia’s report because they establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that the US Department of Defense is being dishonest and shady when it comes to the UFO subject. For decades, Australia has been a loyal friend of the United States. Within Australia’s boundaries, they share a military installation (Pine Gap). When a close defense ally’s intelligence agencies determined that the US was not being intellectually honest in its approach, perhaps it is reasonable to conclude that there is more to the tale than the 144 incidents studied since 2004 by the UAPTF.

The CIA became alarmed at the overloading of military communications during the mass sightings of 1952 and considered the possibility that the USSR may take advantage of such a situation.

Australian UFO study.

According to the summary, OSI, acting through the Robertson-Panel, encouraged the USAF to use Project Blue Book to publicly “debunk” UFOs. In a tragic twist of fate, when Australian authorities sought explanations from the US Air Force, the allegation was debunked. The authors of the study were depicted as conspiratorial and even crazy by the US Air Force. Ross Coulthart reported this, and it may be heard in a recent Project Unity interview. Courthart is an award-winning investigative journalist who is drawn to forbidden subjects. He also stated on the same podcast that a senior US Navy official identified as Nat Kobitz told him that the US had been in the midst of reverse-engineering numerous non-human craft. According to his obituary, Mr. Kobitz was a former Director of Research and Development at Naval Sea Systems Command.

Continue reading the entire article at The Pulse. 

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading

General

PGA Tour To End COVID Testing For Both Vaccinated & Non-Vaccinated Players

Avatar

Published

on

By

CE Staff Writer 4 minute read

In Brief

  • The Facts:

    The PGA Tour has announced that it will stop testing players every week, regardless of whether they have been vaccinated or not.

  • Reflect On:

    Are PCR tests appropriate to identify infectious people? Should people who are healthy and not sick be tested at all, anywhere?

Before you begin...

Coherent icon

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

The picture you see above is of John Rahm, a professional golfer on the PGA tour being carted off the golf course after tournament officials told him he had COVID. He was healthy and had no symptoms, yet was forced to withdraw from the tournament. He was told in front of the camera’s, and a big scene was made out of the event. You would think something like that, especially when you are a big time sports figure, would be done behind closed doors with some privacy.

Earlier on in June a spokesperson for the PGA Tour said that more than 50 percent of players on the PGA tour have been vaccinated. Although it seems that the majority of players on the tour will be fully vaccinated judging by this statement, it does leave a fairly large minority who won’t be, and that’s something we’re seeing across the globe as COVID vaccine hesitancy remains high for multiple reasons.

We are pleased to announce, after consultation with PGA Tour medical advisors, that due to the high rate of vaccination among all constituents on the PGA Tour, as well as other positively trending factors across the country, testing for COVID-19 will no longer be required as a condition of competition beginning with the 3M Open. – PGA tour Senior VP Tyler Dennis

The tour recently announced that the testing of players every week will stop starting in July for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This was an unexpected announcement given the fact that, at least it seems in some countries, vaccinated individuals will enjoy previous rights and freedoms that everyone did before the pandemic. Travelling without need to quarantine and possibly in the future not having to be tested could be a few of those privileges. Others may include attending concerts, sporting events, or perhaps even keeping their job depending on whether or not their employer deems it to be mandatory, if that’s even legally possible. We will see what happens.

Luckily for professional golfers, regardless of their vaccination status they won’t have to worry about testing positive for COVID, especially if they’re not sick. This is the appropriate move by the PGA tour, who is represented by their players and it’s a move that the players themselves may have had a say in. It’s important because PCR tests are not designed nor are they appropriate for identifying infectious people. A number of scientists have been emphasizing this since the beginning of the pandemic. More recently, a letter to the editor published in the Journal of infection explain why more than half of al “positive” PCR tests are likely to have been people who are not infectious, otherwise known as “false positives.”

This is why the Swedish Public Health agency has a notice on their website explaining how and why polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are not useful for determining if someone is infected with COVID or if someone can transmit it to others, and it’s better to use someone who is actually showing symptoms as a judgement call of whether or not they could be infected or free from infection.

PCR tests using a high cycle threshold are extremely sensitive. An article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35, only 3 percent of the samples showed viral replication. This can be interpreted as, if someone tests positive via PCR when a Ct of 35 or higher is used, the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 percent. This begs the question, why has Manitoba, Canada, for example, using cycle thresholds of up to 45 to identify “positive” people?

When it comes to golf, the fact that spread occurring in an outdoor setting is highly unlikely could have been a factor, but it’s also important to mention that asymptomatic spread within one’s own household is also considerably rare. It really makes you wonder what’s going on here, doesn’t it?

Dive Deeper

Click below to watch a sneak peek of our brand new course!

Our new course is called 'Overcoming Bias & Improving Critical Thinking.' This 5 week course is instructed by Dr. Madhava Setty & Joe Martino

If you have been wanting to build your self awareness, improve your.critical thinking, become more heart centered and be more aware of bias, this is the perfect course!

Click here to check out a sneak peek and learn more.

Continue Reading
advertisement - learn more
advertisement - learn more

Video

Our Journalism Has Moved

Our journalism has moved to The Pulse

You have Successfully Subscribed!